63
 RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ. Chapter 9. Clutter and Moving Target Indicator (MTI)

MS_9장 Clutter and MTI

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

clutter and MTI

Citation preview

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Chapter 9.

    Clutter and Moving Target

    Indicator (MTI)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Ground Radar - Environment

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Radar Environments

    < Radar signals and Interference>

    - Noise :

    in the receiver, ant, tx line

    outside from sun random.

    Random motion at all temp.

    above absolute zero.

    - Clutter : Unwanted signal

    echo from sea, land, weather

    - ECM :

    electromagnetic

    countermeasures noise jamming

    - EMI :

    friendly sources such as other radar, comm. sys, friendly jammer

    - Spillover : internal clutter

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.1 Clutter Definition Clutter Definition : Clutter is unwanted radar returns

    that may interfere with normal radar operations.

    Type : Mainloabe Clutter & Sidelobe Clutter

    1) Surface clutter :

    - Ground clutter : trees, vegetation, ground terrain, man-made structure

    - Sea clutter : sea surface (sea clutter)

    2) Volume clutter : chaff, rain, birds, insects

    Notes: Individual clutter components : random phase and amplitude

    Clutter signal level >> receiver noise level

    Radars ability to detect targets signal-to-clutter ratio (SCR)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Radar Clutter Type

    Clutter

    OTHER VOLUME AREA

    Land

    -mountains

    -woods

    -vegetated

    farmland

    -desert

    SEA

    Weather

    - rain

    - snow

    Chaff

    Dust storm

    Moving vehicles

    Birds

    Insects

    Angles

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Signal-to-Clutter Ratio (SCR)

    areaclutter Ac

    )/(tcoefficienscatteringclutterwhere

    )1.9(

    isClutterAverage

    220

    0

    mm

    A

    RCS

    cc

    -Propagation factor :

    - constructive/destructive interference of the electromagnetic waves diffracted

    from an object (target or clutter)

    -Target/clutter returns with different angles of arrival of different

    propagation factors

    2

    22

    cc

    rtt

    F

    FFSCR

    rtrt

    c

    FFFF

    F

    case,many in target.forfactorsnpropagatioRx/Tx/

    factornpropagatioclutterwhere

    )2.9(

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.2 Surface Clutter

    - Surface clutter includes both land and sea clutter.

    - Area clutter is concern for

    1) Airborne radars in the look-down mode

    2) ground-based radars when searching for targets at low grazing angle.

    - Grazing angle ( ) : angle from the surface of the earth to the main axis of

    the illuminating beam.

    g

    < Definition of grazing angle >

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Grazing Angle vs. Scattering Coefficient

    - Three factors affect the amount of clutter in the radar beam.

    1) Grazing angle 2) Surface roughness 3) Radar wavelength

    - Smaller wavelength larger scattering coefficient 0

    < Dependency of on the grazing angle > 0

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Critical Grazing Angle

    - Low grazing angle region : from zero to the critical angle.

    - Critical angle : angle below which a surface is considered to be smooth, and

    above which a surface is considered to be rough.

    - hrms = rms of a surface height irregularity

    - According to the Rayleigh criteria the surface is considered to be smooth if

    2sin

    4

    g

    rmsh

    - Due to surface height irregularity, the rough path is longer than the

    smooth path

    by a distance .

    grmsh sin2

    )3.9(

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    grmsh

    sin2

    2

    Rough Surface

    < Rough surface definition >

    - When (first null), Grazing angle = critical angle g gc

    - This path difference translates into a phase differential

    )4.9(

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Rough Surface

    gc

    rmsh sin4

    or equivalently,

    rms

    gch

    1sin

    - In the case of sea clutter, the rms surface height irregularity is

    )7.9(046.0025.0 72.1staterms Sh

    - Clutter at low grazing angle diffuse clutter : large number of clutter

    returns in the radar beam (non-coherent

    reflections)

    - Clutter in the high grazing angle region is more specular (coherent

    reflections)

    )5.9(

    )6.9(

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Radar Equation for Area Clutter

    - Airborne radar in the look-down mode case.

    Elliptical shape

    - Footprint size =

    - Footprint is divided into many ground range bins each size gc sec)2/(

    ),( 3dBgf

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    - 0

    -

    ( 3% )

    (A)

    )sec()2//2)tan(2R(cA az

    43

    2

    0

    2

    t

    43

    22

    tc

    )4(

    P

    )4(

    PP

    R

    AG

    R

    G

    Ground Clutter Model

    : 3

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    sec)2/(c

    )2/tan(2

    az

    R

    R

    2/

    )2/tan(2tan

    c

    R el

    RadarbeamwidthazimuthPowerHalfaz

    2/

    )2/tan(2tan sec)2/tan()2/(2

    c

    RwherecRA elaz

    Ground Clutter Geometry

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Radar Equation for Area Clutter

    - Clutter area Ac is

    )8.9(sec2

    3 gdBc

    cRA

    - Power received by the radar from

    a scatterer within Ac is

    )9.9()4( 43

    22

    R

    GPS ttt

    RCSt targetwhere

    < Footprint definition >

    - Received power from clutter is

    )10.9()4( 43

    22

    R

    GPS ctAc

    - SCR for area clutter is

    )11.9(cos2

    )(3

    0

    RcSCR

    dB

    gt

    A c

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Example 9.1

    ../0136.0

    ,1.20

    ,20,2,02.0

    3.:1.9

    22

    2

    3

    SCRtheComputemm

    tcoefficienreflectionclutterandmRCStargetAssume

    anglegrazingandkmRrangeswidthpulsetheradbe

    widthbeamdBantennatheLetradarairborneanConsiderExample

    o

    t

    o

    g

    dB

    .10,)36(

    06.36)(

    1048.2)102)(103)(20000)(02.0)(0136.0(

    )20)(cos1)(2(cos2)( 4

    68

    3

    0

    betterordBofordertheonisXwheredBXleastat

    bySCRitsincreasesomehowmustradarthedetectionrelibleforthus,

    dBSCR

    thatfollowsIt

    RcSCR

    c

    c

    A

    dB

    gt

    A

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    - Sea State

    WM v 8.0

    105.0 WWv

    )sec()2/ /2)tan(2R(cA az

    43

    2

    0

    2

    t

    43

    22

    tc

    )4(

    P

    )4(

    PP

    R

    AG

    R

    G

    cP

    Sea Clutter Model

    R

    -

    -

    (A)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.3 Volume clutter

    - Volume clutter includes rain, chaff, birds, insects the volume clutter

    coefficient is expressed in squared meters

    - Birds, insects and other flying particles are referred to as angel clutter

    the average RCS as a function of the weight of the bird or insect is reported

    as,

    bdBsmb wlog8.546

    where, wb is the individual weight in grams

    - Bird and insect RCS are also function of frequency

    ex) pigeons RCS is -26dBsm at S-band, -27dBsm at X-band

    (9.12)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    - Wind Shear, Beam Broadening, Turbulence

    -

    Az/El/(V)

    43

    22

    t

    43

    22

    tc

    )4(

    P

    )4(

    PP

    R

    VG

    R

    G v

    cP

    2/4/2 cRV azel

    Volume Clutter Model

    radar To

    elR

    azR

    2/c

    24

    2 cRV azel

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    - Chaff is used as ECM technique by hostile forces.

    It consist of a large number of dipole reflectors (large RCS values).

    Maximum chaff RCS occurs when dipole length L is one half radar wavelength.

    Average RCS for single dipole when broadside is,

    2

    1 88.0 chaff and for an average aspect angle, it drops to

    2

    1 15.0 chaff where, the subscript chaff1 indicate a single dipole

    - The total chaff RCS within radar resolution volume is,

    Dchaff N215.0

    where, ND is total number of dipoles in the resolution volume

    Chaff RCS

    (9.13)

    (9.14)

    (9.15)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    22222

    0 cos

    fallbeamturbshearv

    v VM

    sec)/( )sin(0.1

    sec)/( sin42.0

    sec)/( 0.1

    sec)/( 42.0

    0

    m

    mV

    m

    mkR

    fall

    azbeam

    turb

    elshear

    Rain Clutter Model

    ec)center(m/s beamat speed windV

    angleelevation

    center beamat direction wind torelativeazimuth

    radians)beamwidth(azimuth

    radians)beamwidth(elevation

    )range(slant

    ))/(sec)((4gradient shear wind

    0

    az

    el

    KmR

    Kmmk

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    - Weather or rain clutter is easier to suppress than chaff, since rain can be as

    perfect small spheres.

    - We can use the Rayleigh approximation of perfect sphere to rain droplets

    RCS Rayleigh approximation is given as,

    rkrr 429

    where, and r is radius of a rain droplet /2k

    - Electromagnetic wave when reflected from perfect sphere become strongly

    co-polarized (same polarization as incident waves) .

    Therefore backscatter energy from rain retains the same polarization as

    incident waves, but reversed direction of propagation.

    So, radar suppress rain clutter by co-polarizing the radar antenna.

    Weather and rain clutter

    (9.16)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    - Defining as RCS per unit resolution volume VW, it computed as,

    N

    i

    i

    1

    where, N is the total number of scatterers within the resolution volume

    - Total RCS of a single resolution volume is,

    N

    i

    WiW v1

    - A resolution volume is in Fig 9.6, and is approximated by

    cRV eaW2

    8

    where, a ,b are antenna beam width in az, el, is pulse width, R is range

    (9.17)

    (9.18)

    (9.19)

    Resolution volume

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    - Consider a propagation medium with an index of refraction m.

    The ith rain droplet RCS approximation in this medium is,

    62

    4

    5

    ii DK

    where, 2

    2

    22

    2

    1

    m

    mK

    where, Di is the ith droplet diameter

    (9.20)

    (9.21)

    Weather clutter coefficient

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    - For example, temperatures between 32F and 68F yield,

    6

    4

    5

    93.0 ii D

    - and for ice (9.20) can be approximated by,

    6

    4

    5

    2.0 ii D

    - Substituting (9.20) into (9.17) yields

    ZK 24

    5

    where the weather clutter coefficient Z is defined as

    N

    i

    iDZ1

    6

    - In general, the units of Z are often expressed in millimeter6/m3

    (9.22)

    (9.23)

    (9.24)

    (9.25)

    Weather clutter coefficient

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Radar equation for volume clutter

    - The total power received by radar from t at R is

    43

    22

    )4( R

    GPS ttt

    - The weather clutter power received by the radar is

    43

    22

    )4( R

    GPS WtW

    - Using (9.18) and (9.19) into (9.27) and collecting terms yield,

    N

    i

    ieat

    W cRR

    GPS

    1

    2

    43

    22

    8)4(

    - SCR for weather clutter is computed by dividing (9.26) by (9.28), more

    precisely,

    N

    i

    iea

    t

    W

    tV

    RcS

    SSCR

    1

    2

    8

    where V is used to denote volume clutter.

    (9.26)

    (9.27)

    (9.28)

    (9.29)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.4 Clutter statistical models

    - Clutter is statistically described by a probability distribution function.

    The type of distribution depends on the nature of clutter itself (sea, land,

    volume), radar operating frequency and the grazing angle.

    - If probability of receiving scatterer is statistically independent of another

    scatterer, then, the clutter may be modeled using a Rayleigh distribution,

    0;exp2

    0

    2

    0

    x

    x

    x

    x

    xxf

    where x0 is the mean squared value of x

    - The log-nomal distribution best describes land clutter at low grazing angles.

    it also fits sea clutter in the plateau region. It given by,

    (9.30)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Clutter statistical models

    - Weibull distribution is used to model clutter at low grazing angles for 1 to 10

    Ghz. Weibull probability density function is determined by the Weibull slope

    parameter and a median scatter coefficient 0 and given by,

    0;exp00

    1

    xxbx

    xfbb

    where, b=1/a is known as the shape prameter.

    when b=2 the Weibull distribution becomes a Rayleigh distribution.

    (9.32)

    where xm is the median of the random variable x, is the standard deviation

    of ln(x).

    0;2

    lnlnexp

    2

    12

    2

    x

    xxxf m

    (9.31)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.5 Clutter Spectrum

    - Clutter is not always stationary : wind speed, motion of the radar scanning

    antenna Doppler frequency spread

    - In Ground Radar

    clutter spectrum : concentrated around 0f

    rPRF f

    and integer multiples of the radar

    : some small spreading

    - clutter power spectrum : fixed (stationary) + random (frequency spreading)

    for most cases, Gaussian

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Clutter Spectrum

    parameter Weibull: component, spreadfrequency rms: ,2 00 of

    frequency spreading stationary clutter

    2

    2

    0

    22

    002

    2

    02

    exp211

    WW

    WwSc (9.33)

    - Clutter power :

    concentrated around zero Doppler with some spreading

    (typically less than 100Hz)

    2W- denote the fixed to the random power ratio by

    clutter spectrum

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Ground Clutter - Environment

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Clutter Radial Velocity Characteristics

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Clutter PSD

    Concentrated around DC and integer multiples PRF

    2

    2

    0

    2 2exp

    2

    cc

    PwS (9.34)

    mean : deviation, : clutter, total: 0cP

    - Model clutter using a Gaussian-shaped power spectrum

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    clitterchaffandraingroundtoMTIcancellerdoubleaofeResponc ,,*

    Clutter Spectrum Characteristics

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.6 Moving Target Indicator (MTI)

    - In CW radar :

    suppress clutter return by

    ignoring the receiver output DC

    - MTI filter :

    deep stop-band at DC and

    at integer multiples of the PRF

    (a) Typical radar return PSD

    (b) MTI filter frequency response

    (c) Output from an MTI filter

    - In Pulsed radar system:

    suppress clutter return by using

    special filter, MTI

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Blind Speed

    MTI Filter

    - using delay line cancelers

    - periodic frequency response (null at

    Blind speed : target Doppler frequency=

    0 ;2

    nnf

    v rblind

    severely attenuate

    - minimize the occurrence of blind speeds

    PRF staggering : changing PRF between consecutive pulses

    using high PRF

    rnf )

    rnf

    (9.35)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Coherent MTI Radar Block Diagram

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.7 Single Delay Line Canceler

    Ttxtxty

    Tttth

    11 zzH

    f 2 TjeH 1

    two-pulse canceler

    rf T

    thtxty

    th

    1 PRIdelay

    output : *

    response impulse :

    < Single delay line canceler >

    (9.36)

    (9.37)

    (9.38)

    (9.39)

    impulse response

    Fourier transform

    Z-domain

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Power gain (Single Delay line Canceler)

    TjTj eeHHH 11*2

    TeeH TjTj cos12112

    2sin42cos22

    22 2sin4 TH

    Power gain for the single delay line canceler response

    wtjwte jwt sincos

    (9.40)

    (9.41)

    (9.42)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    MATLAB Function single_canceler.m

    < Single canceler frequency response >

    rrr nfffn fPRFf nulls ,212peak ),( periodcanceler single

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.8 Double Delay Line Canceler

    - Two basic configurations of a double delay line canceler

    Double canceler are often called three-pulse canceler

    < Two configurations for a double delay line canceler. >

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    - The double line canceler impulse response is given by

    )2()(2)()( TtTttth

    - The power gain for the double delay line canceler is

    2

    1

    2

    1

    2)()()( HHH

    - It follows that

    4

    2

    2sin16)(

    TH

    (9.43)

    (9.44)

    (9.45)

    Double Delay Line Canceler

    - In the z-domain

    2121 21)1()( zzzzH (9.46)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    MATLAB Function double_canceler.m

    - MATLAB Function double_canceler.m

    )(_][ fofrcancelerdoubleresp

    is the number of periods desired.

    Better response than the single canceler (deeper notch and flatter pass-band response)

    fofr

    < Normalized frequency response for single and double cancelers. >

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.9 Delay Line with Feedback(Recursive Filters)

    - The advantage of a recursive filter

    shape the frequency response of the filter

    < MTI recursive filter >

    - From the figure

    )()1()()( twKtxty

    - Applying the z-transform to the above three equation yields

    )()()( twtytv

    )()( Ttvtw

    )()1()()( zWKzXzY

    )()()( zWzYzV

    )()( 1 zVzzW

    (9.47)

    (9.48)

    (9.49)

    (9.50)

    (9.51)

    (9.52)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Delay Line with Feedback(Recursive Filters)

    - Solving for the transfer function yields

    - The modulus square of is then equal to

    1

    1

    1

    1)(

    Kz

    zzH

    - Using the transformation yields

    )(zH

    )()1(

    )(2

    )1)(1(

    )1)(1()(

    12

    1

    1

    12

    zzKK

    zz

    KzKz

    zzzH

    Tjez

    Tzz cos21

    )(/)()( zXzYzH

    (9.53)

    (9.54)

    (9.55)

    - Thus, Eq. (9.54) can now be rewritten as

    )cos(2)1(

    )cos1(2)(

    2

    2

    TKK

    TeH Tj

    (9.56)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Delay Line with Feedback(Recursive Filters)

    - When K=0, Eq. (9.56) collapses to Eq. (9.42)

    22 2/sin4)( TH (9.42)

    - By changing the gain factor K one can control of the filter response

    < Frequency response corresponding to Eq.(9.56). >

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Delay Line with Feedback(Recursive Filters)

    - In order to avoid oscillation due to the positive feedback

    the value of K should be less than unity

    - The value is normally equal to the number of pulses received from

    the target

    ex) K=0.9 corresponds to ten pulses

    1)1( K

    K=0.98 corresponds to about fifty pulses

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.10 PRF Staggering

    - Blind speeds can pose serious limitations

    performance of MTI radars

    ability to perform adequate target detection

    - Using PRF agility by changing the pulse repetition interval consecutive pulse

    extend the first blind speed to tolerable values

    - In order to show how PRF staggering

    assume that two radars with distinct PRFs are utilized for detection

    using two radars to alleviate the problem of blind speed is a very costly

    option

    - A more practical solution

    to use a single radar with two or more different PRFs

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    - Consider a radar system with two interpulse periods and

    PRF Staggering

    2

    1

    2

    1

    n

    n

    T

    T (9.57)

    Where, and are integer 1n 2n

    2T1T

    - The first true blind speed occurs when 2

    2

    1

    1

    T

    n

    T

    n (9.58)

    - The ratio (stagger ratio) 2

    1

    n

    nks (9.59)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    PRF Staggering

    < Frequency responses of a single canceler. T1=4, T2=3, T1/T2=4/3 >

    - Using staggering ratios closer to

    unity the first true blind speed

    farther out

    - The dip in the vicinity of

    becomes deeper 1/1 T

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    PRF Staggering

    < MTI responses, staggering ratio 63/64 >

    - In general, if there are N PRFs related by

    N

    N

    T

    n

    T

    n

    T

    n

    2

    2

    1

    1

    - The first true blind speed for the staggered waveform is

    121

    blindN

    blind vN

    nnnv

    - If the first blind speed to occur for any of the indiviual PRFs is 1blindv

    (9.60)

    (9.61)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.11 MTI Improvement Factor

    Performance of MTI systems - Clutter Attenuation (CA)

    - MTI Improvement factor

    (1) MTI Clutter attenuation

    CA = Ci / Co Ci : MTI filter input clutter power

    Co : Output clutter power

    (2) MTI Improvement factor

    CAS

    S

    C

    C

    S

    S

    C

    S

    C

    SI

    i

    i

    ii

    i

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    So/Si = |H(w)|2 : average power gain for MTI filter

    (9.62)

    (9.63)

    (9.64)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    MTI Improvement Factor

    Gaussian clutter power spectrum

    2

    22

    8exp

    22)(

    v

    fPfW

    v

    c

    (9.65)

    Pc : clutter power (constant) c : clutter rms frequency

    /2 vc (9.66)

    v : rms wind velocity => wind: main reason of clutter freq. spreading

    )2exp(2

    )( 22 cc

    c fP

    fW

    (9.67)

    Clutter power at the input of an MTI filter

    dffP

    Ccc

    co

    2

    2

    2exp

    2 (9.68)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    MTI Improvement Factor

    Factoring out

    Clutter power at output of an MTI

    dff

    PCcc

    ci

    2

    2

    2exp

    2

    1

    ci PC

    (9.69)

    (9.70)

    dffHfWCo2

    )()(

    (9.71)

    Analysis using a single delay line canceller

    Single canceller power gain 2

    2sin4)(

    rf

    ffH

    (9.72)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    MTI Improvement Factor

    Small f, then ratio f/ fr is very small. (ie c

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    MTI Improvement Factor

    Substituting eq.(9.76)&(9.70) into (9.62) 2

    2

    c

    r

    o

    i f

    C

    CCA

    (9.77)

    (9.78)

    (9.79)

    (9.80)

    Improvement factor for a single canceller 2

    0

    2

    c

    r

    i

    f

    S

    SI

    Power gain ratio for a single canceller

    22

    cos221

    )(

    2/

    2/

    2

    dff

    f

    ffH

    r

    r

    f

    f rr

    Using the trigonometric identity 2)(sin4)2cos22(

    dff

    f

    ffH

    S

    S

    r

    f

    fri

    o

    r

    r

    22/

    2/

    2sin4

    1)(

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    MTI Improvement Factor

    It follows that 2

    22

    c

    rfI

    (9.81) => Only c

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.12 Subclutter Visibility (SCV)

    Phrase Subclutter Visibility (SCV)

    - radars ability to detect non-stationary targets in a strong clutter background

    - used as a measure of MTI performance

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Subclutter Visibility (SCV)

    SCV - expressed as the ratio of the improvement factor to the min.MTI output

    SCR

    Phrase Interclutter Visibility (ICV)

    radars ability to detect non-stationary targets between strong clutter points

    - > if radar system - resolve the area of strong and weak clutter

    oSCRISCV )/(

    SCV of two radars not compare their performance

    -> target-to-clutter ratio : proportional to the size of the radar resolution

    cell and may also be a function of frequency.

    ex) Radar system with 10us pulse length & 10o beamwidth : need 20dB more

    SCV than Radar system with 1us pulse length & 1o beamwidth.

    (9.82)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    9.13 Delay Line Cancellers with Optimal Weights

    Delay line canceller transversal FIR filter (tapped delay line filter)

    Weights : binomial coefficients -> N-stage cascaded single line cancellers

    Binomial coefficient :

    1,...,1;)!1()!1(

    !)1( 1

    Ni

    iiN

    Nw ii (9.83)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Delay Line Cancellers with Optimal Weights

    Using the binomial coefficients produces an MTI filter (approximated optimal

    filter) -> maximize the improvement factor

    Two equivalent three delay line cancellers

    (a) Tapped delay line (b)Three cascaded single line cancellers

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Delay Line Cancellers with Optimal Weights

    For example, N=2 (delay line canceller)

    N

    i r

    N

    ii f

    ffH

    S

    S

    1

    2

    1

    2

    10 sin4)(

    (9.85)

    Average power gain for an N-stage delay line canceller

    2

    0 sin16

    ri f

    f

    S

    S

    (9.84)

    Rewritten N

    r

    NN

    i f

    ffH

    S

    S2

    22

    10 sin2)(

    (9.86)

    Blind speeds for N-stage delay canceller : identical to single cancellers blind speed

    Blind speed : independent from the number of cancellers used

    ...!3

    )2)(1(

    !2

    )1(1

    22

    20

    NNNNNN

    S

    S

    i

    (9.87)

  • RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.

    Delay Line Cancellers with Optimal Weights

    General expression by Nathanson

    TT

    I

    23

    1

    3

    41

    1

    (9.88)

    wk & wj : weights of tapped delay line canceller

    ((k-j)/fr) : correlation coefficient between the kth and jth samples

    For example, N = 2

    N

    k

    N

    j r

    k

    io

    f

    jkww

    SSI

    j

    1 1

    * )(

    )/(

    (9.89)