Upload
wesley-george
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
clutter and MTI
Citation preview
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Chapter 9.
Clutter and Moving Target
Indicator (MTI)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Ground Radar - Environment
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Radar Environments
< Radar signals and Interference>
- Noise :
in the receiver, ant, tx line
outside from sun random.
Random motion at all temp.
above absolute zero.
- Clutter : Unwanted signal
echo from sea, land, weather
- ECM :
electromagnetic
countermeasures noise jamming
- EMI :
friendly sources such as other radar, comm. sys, friendly jammer
- Spillover : internal clutter
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.1 Clutter Definition Clutter Definition : Clutter is unwanted radar returns
that may interfere with normal radar operations.
Type : Mainloabe Clutter & Sidelobe Clutter
1) Surface clutter :
- Ground clutter : trees, vegetation, ground terrain, man-made structure
- Sea clutter : sea surface (sea clutter)
2) Volume clutter : chaff, rain, birds, insects
Notes: Individual clutter components : random phase and amplitude
Clutter signal level >> receiver noise level
Radars ability to detect targets signal-to-clutter ratio (SCR)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Radar Clutter Type
Clutter
OTHER VOLUME AREA
Land
-mountains
-woods
-vegetated
farmland
-desert
SEA
Weather
- rain
- snow
Chaff
Dust storm
Moving vehicles
Birds
Insects
Angles
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Signal-to-Clutter Ratio (SCR)
areaclutter Ac
)/(tcoefficienscatteringclutterwhere
)1.9(
isClutterAverage
220
0
mm
A
RCS
cc
-Propagation factor :
- constructive/destructive interference of the electromagnetic waves diffracted
from an object (target or clutter)
-Target/clutter returns with different angles of arrival of different
propagation factors
2
22
cc
rtt
F
FFSCR
rtrt
c
FFFF
F
case,many in target.forfactorsnpropagatioRx/Tx/
factornpropagatioclutterwhere
)2.9(
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.2 Surface Clutter
- Surface clutter includes both land and sea clutter.
- Area clutter is concern for
1) Airborne radars in the look-down mode
2) ground-based radars when searching for targets at low grazing angle.
- Grazing angle ( ) : angle from the surface of the earth to the main axis of
the illuminating beam.
g
< Definition of grazing angle >
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Grazing Angle vs. Scattering Coefficient
- Three factors affect the amount of clutter in the radar beam.
1) Grazing angle 2) Surface roughness 3) Radar wavelength
- Smaller wavelength larger scattering coefficient 0
< Dependency of on the grazing angle > 0
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Critical Grazing Angle
- Low grazing angle region : from zero to the critical angle.
- Critical angle : angle below which a surface is considered to be smooth, and
above which a surface is considered to be rough.
- hrms = rms of a surface height irregularity
- According to the Rayleigh criteria the surface is considered to be smooth if
2sin
4
g
rmsh
- Due to surface height irregularity, the rough path is longer than the
smooth path
by a distance .
grmsh sin2
)3.9(
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
grmsh
sin2
2
Rough Surface
< Rough surface definition >
- When (first null), Grazing angle = critical angle g gc
- This path difference translates into a phase differential
)4.9(
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Rough Surface
gc
rmsh sin4
or equivalently,
rms
gch
1sin
- In the case of sea clutter, the rms surface height irregularity is
)7.9(046.0025.0 72.1staterms Sh
- Clutter at low grazing angle diffuse clutter : large number of clutter
returns in the radar beam (non-coherent
reflections)
- Clutter in the high grazing angle region is more specular (coherent
reflections)
)5.9(
)6.9(
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Radar Equation for Area Clutter
- Airborne radar in the look-down mode case.
Elliptical shape
- Footprint size =
- Footprint is divided into many ground range bins each size gc sec)2/(
),( 3dBgf
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
- 0
-
( 3% )
(A)
)sec()2//2)tan(2R(cA az
43
2
0
2
t
43
22
tc
)4(
P
)4(
PP
R
AG
R
G
Ground Clutter Model
: 3
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
sec)2/(c
)2/tan(2
az
R
R
2/
)2/tan(2tan
c
R el
RadarbeamwidthazimuthPowerHalfaz
2/
)2/tan(2tan sec)2/tan()2/(2
c
RwherecRA elaz
Ground Clutter Geometry
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Radar Equation for Area Clutter
- Clutter area Ac is
)8.9(sec2
3 gdBc
cRA
- Power received by the radar from
a scatterer within Ac is
)9.9()4( 43
22
R
GPS ttt
RCSt targetwhere
< Footprint definition >
- Received power from clutter is
)10.9()4( 43
22
R
GPS ctAc
- SCR for area clutter is
)11.9(cos2
)(3
0
RcSCR
dB
gt
A c
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Example 9.1
../0136.0
,1.20
,20,2,02.0
3.:1.9
22
2
3
SCRtheComputemm
tcoefficienreflectionclutterandmRCStargetAssume
anglegrazingandkmRrangeswidthpulsetheradbe
widthbeamdBantennatheLetradarairborneanConsiderExample
o
t
o
g
dB
.10,)36(
06.36)(
1048.2)102)(103)(20000)(02.0)(0136.0(
)20)(cos1)(2(cos2)( 4
68
3
0
betterordBofordertheonisXwheredBXleastat
bySCRitsincreasesomehowmustradarthedetectionrelibleforthus,
dBSCR
thatfollowsIt
RcSCR
c
c
A
dB
gt
A
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
- Sea State
WM v 8.0
105.0 WWv
)sec()2/ /2)tan(2R(cA az
43
2
0
2
t
43
22
tc
)4(
P
)4(
PP
R
AG
R
G
cP
Sea Clutter Model
R
-
-
(A)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.3 Volume clutter
- Volume clutter includes rain, chaff, birds, insects the volume clutter
coefficient is expressed in squared meters
- Birds, insects and other flying particles are referred to as angel clutter
the average RCS as a function of the weight of the bird or insect is reported
as,
bdBsmb wlog8.546
where, wb is the individual weight in grams
- Bird and insect RCS are also function of frequency
ex) pigeons RCS is -26dBsm at S-band, -27dBsm at X-band
(9.12)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
- Wind Shear, Beam Broadening, Turbulence
-
Az/El/(V)
43
22
t
43
22
tc
)4(
P
)4(
PP
R
VG
R
G v
cP
2/4/2 cRV azel
Volume Clutter Model
radar To
elR
azR
2/c
24
2 cRV azel
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
- Chaff is used as ECM technique by hostile forces.
It consist of a large number of dipole reflectors (large RCS values).
Maximum chaff RCS occurs when dipole length L is one half radar wavelength.
Average RCS for single dipole when broadside is,
2
1 88.0 chaff and for an average aspect angle, it drops to
2
1 15.0 chaff where, the subscript chaff1 indicate a single dipole
- The total chaff RCS within radar resolution volume is,
Dchaff N215.0
where, ND is total number of dipoles in the resolution volume
Chaff RCS
(9.13)
(9.14)
(9.15)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
22222
0 cos
fallbeamturbshearv
v VM
sec)/( )sin(0.1
sec)/( sin42.0
sec)/( 0.1
sec)/( 42.0
0
m
mV
m
mkR
fall
azbeam
turb
elshear
Rain Clutter Model
ec)center(m/s beamat speed windV
angleelevation
center beamat direction wind torelativeazimuth
radians)beamwidth(azimuth
radians)beamwidth(elevation
)range(slant
))/(sec)((4gradient shear wind
0
az
el
KmR
Kmmk
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
- Weather or rain clutter is easier to suppress than chaff, since rain can be as
perfect small spheres.
- We can use the Rayleigh approximation of perfect sphere to rain droplets
RCS Rayleigh approximation is given as,
rkrr 429
where, and r is radius of a rain droplet /2k
- Electromagnetic wave when reflected from perfect sphere become strongly
co-polarized (same polarization as incident waves) .
Therefore backscatter energy from rain retains the same polarization as
incident waves, but reversed direction of propagation.
So, radar suppress rain clutter by co-polarizing the radar antenna.
Weather and rain clutter
(9.16)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
- Defining as RCS per unit resolution volume VW, it computed as,
N
i
i
1
where, N is the total number of scatterers within the resolution volume
- Total RCS of a single resolution volume is,
N
i
WiW v1
- A resolution volume is in Fig 9.6, and is approximated by
cRV eaW2
8
where, a ,b are antenna beam width in az, el, is pulse width, R is range
(9.17)
(9.18)
(9.19)
Resolution volume
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
- Consider a propagation medium with an index of refraction m.
The ith rain droplet RCS approximation in this medium is,
62
4
5
ii DK
where, 2
2
22
2
1
m
mK
where, Di is the ith droplet diameter
(9.20)
(9.21)
Weather clutter coefficient
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
- For example, temperatures between 32F and 68F yield,
6
4
5
93.0 ii D
- and for ice (9.20) can be approximated by,
6
4
5
2.0 ii D
- Substituting (9.20) into (9.17) yields
ZK 24
5
where the weather clutter coefficient Z is defined as
N
i
iDZ1
6
- In general, the units of Z are often expressed in millimeter6/m3
(9.22)
(9.23)
(9.24)
(9.25)
Weather clutter coefficient
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Radar equation for volume clutter
- The total power received by radar from t at R is
43
22
)4( R
GPS ttt
- The weather clutter power received by the radar is
43
22
)4( R
GPS WtW
- Using (9.18) and (9.19) into (9.27) and collecting terms yield,
N
i
ieat
W cRR
GPS
1
2
43
22
8)4(
- SCR for weather clutter is computed by dividing (9.26) by (9.28), more
precisely,
N
i
iea
t
W
tV
RcS
SSCR
1
2
8
where V is used to denote volume clutter.
(9.26)
(9.27)
(9.28)
(9.29)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.4 Clutter statistical models
- Clutter is statistically described by a probability distribution function.
The type of distribution depends on the nature of clutter itself (sea, land,
volume), radar operating frequency and the grazing angle.
- If probability of receiving scatterer is statistically independent of another
scatterer, then, the clutter may be modeled using a Rayleigh distribution,
0;exp2
0
2
0
x
x
x
x
xxf
where x0 is the mean squared value of x
- The log-nomal distribution best describes land clutter at low grazing angles.
it also fits sea clutter in the plateau region. It given by,
(9.30)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Clutter statistical models
- Weibull distribution is used to model clutter at low grazing angles for 1 to 10
Ghz. Weibull probability density function is determined by the Weibull slope
parameter and a median scatter coefficient 0 and given by,
0;exp00
1
xxbx
xfbb
where, b=1/a is known as the shape prameter.
when b=2 the Weibull distribution becomes a Rayleigh distribution.
(9.32)
where xm is the median of the random variable x, is the standard deviation
of ln(x).
0;2
lnlnexp
2
12
2
x
xxxf m
(9.31)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.5 Clutter Spectrum
- Clutter is not always stationary : wind speed, motion of the radar scanning
antenna Doppler frequency spread
- In Ground Radar
clutter spectrum : concentrated around 0f
rPRF f
and integer multiples of the radar
: some small spreading
- clutter power spectrum : fixed (stationary) + random (frequency spreading)
for most cases, Gaussian
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Clutter Spectrum
parameter Weibull: component, spreadfrequency rms: ,2 00 of
frequency spreading stationary clutter
2
2
0
22
002
2
02
exp211
WW
WwSc (9.33)
- Clutter power :
concentrated around zero Doppler with some spreading
(typically less than 100Hz)
2W- denote the fixed to the random power ratio by
clutter spectrum
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Ground Clutter - Environment
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Clutter Radial Velocity Characteristics
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Clutter PSD
Concentrated around DC and integer multiples PRF
2
2
0
2 2exp
2
cc
PwS (9.34)
mean : deviation, : clutter, total: 0cP
- Model clutter using a Gaussian-shaped power spectrum
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
clitterchaffandraingroundtoMTIcancellerdoubleaofeResponc ,,*
Clutter Spectrum Characteristics
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.6 Moving Target Indicator (MTI)
- In CW radar :
suppress clutter return by
ignoring the receiver output DC
- MTI filter :
deep stop-band at DC and
at integer multiples of the PRF
(a) Typical radar return PSD
(b) MTI filter frequency response
(c) Output from an MTI filter
- In Pulsed radar system:
suppress clutter return by using
special filter, MTI
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Blind Speed
MTI Filter
- using delay line cancelers
- periodic frequency response (null at
Blind speed : target Doppler frequency=
0 ;2
nnf
v rblind
severely attenuate
- minimize the occurrence of blind speeds
PRF staggering : changing PRF between consecutive pulses
using high PRF
rnf )
rnf
(9.35)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Coherent MTI Radar Block Diagram
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.7 Single Delay Line Canceler
Ttxtxty
Tttth
11 zzH
f 2 TjeH 1
two-pulse canceler
rf T
thtxty
th
1 PRIdelay
output : *
response impulse :
< Single delay line canceler >
(9.36)
(9.37)
(9.38)
(9.39)
impulse response
Fourier transform
Z-domain
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Power gain (Single Delay line Canceler)
TjTj eeHHH 11*2
TeeH TjTj cos12112
2sin42cos22
22 2sin4 TH
Power gain for the single delay line canceler response
wtjwte jwt sincos
(9.40)
(9.41)
(9.42)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
MATLAB Function single_canceler.m
< Single canceler frequency response >
rrr nfffn fPRFf nulls ,212peak ),( periodcanceler single
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.8 Double Delay Line Canceler
- Two basic configurations of a double delay line canceler
Double canceler are often called three-pulse canceler
< Two configurations for a double delay line canceler. >
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
- The double line canceler impulse response is given by
)2()(2)()( TtTttth
- The power gain for the double delay line canceler is
2
1
2
1
2)()()( HHH
- It follows that
4
2
2sin16)(
TH
(9.43)
(9.44)
(9.45)
Double Delay Line Canceler
- In the z-domain
2121 21)1()( zzzzH (9.46)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
MATLAB Function double_canceler.m
- MATLAB Function double_canceler.m
)(_][ fofrcancelerdoubleresp
is the number of periods desired.
Better response than the single canceler (deeper notch and flatter pass-band response)
fofr
< Normalized frequency response for single and double cancelers. >
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.9 Delay Line with Feedback(Recursive Filters)
- The advantage of a recursive filter
shape the frequency response of the filter
< MTI recursive filter >
- From the figure
)()1()()( twKtxty
- Applying the z-transform to the above three equation yields
)()()( twtytv
)()( Ttvtw
)()1()()( zWKzXzY
)()()( zWzYzV
)()( 1 zVzzW
(9.47)
(9.48)
(9.49)
(9.50)
(9.51)
(9.52)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Delay Line with Feedback(Recursive Filters)
- Solving for the transfer function yields
- The modulus square of is then equal to
1
1
1
1)(
Kz
zzH
- Using the transformation yields
)(zH
)()1(
)(2
)1)(1(
)1)(1()(
12
1
1
12
zzKK
zz
KzKz
zzzH
Tjez
Tzz cos21
)(/)()( zXzYzH
(9.53)
(9.54)
(9.55)
- Thus, Eq. (9.54) can now be rewritten as
)cos(2)1(
)cos1(2)(
2
2
TKK
TeH Tj
(9.56)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Delay Line with Feedback(Recursive Filters)
- When K=0, Eq. (9.56) collapses to Eq. (9.42)
22 2/sin4)( TH (9.42)
- By changing the gain factor K one can control of the filter response
< Frequency response corresponding to Eq.(9.56). >
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Delay Line with Feedback(Recursive Filters)
- In order to avoid oscillation due to the positive feedback
the value of K should be less than unity
- The value is normally equal to the number of pulses received from
the target
ex) K=0.9 corresponds to ten pulses
1)1( K
K=0.98 corresponds to about fifty pulses
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.10 PRF Staggering
- Blind speeds can pose serious limitations
performance of MTI radars
ability to perform adequate target detection
- Using PRF agility by changing the pulse repetition interval consecutive pulse
extend the first blind speed to tolerable values
- In order to show how PRF staggering
assume that two radars with distinct PRFs are utilized for detection
using two radars to alleviate the problem of blind speed is a very costly
option
- A more practical solution
to use a single radar with two or more different PRFs
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
- Consider a radar system with two interpulse periods and
PRF Staggering
2
1
2
1
n
n
T
T (9.57)
Where, and are integer 1n 2n
2T1T
- The first true blind speed occurs when 2
2
1
1
T
n
T
n (9.58)
- The ratio (stagger ratio) 2
1
n
nks (9.59)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
PRF Staggering
< Frequency responses of a single canceler. T1=4, T2=3, T1/T2=4/3 >
- Using staggering ratios closer to
unity the first true blind speed
farther out
- The dip in the vicinity of
becomes deeper 1/1 T
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
PRF Staggering
< MTI responses, staggering ratio 63/64 >
- In general, if there are N PRFs related by
N
N
T
n
T
n
T
n
2
2
1
1
- The first true blind speed for the staggered waveform is
121
blindN
blind vN
nnnv
- If the first blind speed to occur for any of the indiviual PRFs is 1blindv
(9.60)
(9.61)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.11 MTI Improvement Factor
Performance of MTI systems - Clutter Attenuation (CA)
- MTI Improvement factor
(1) MTI Clutter attenuation
CA = Ci / Co Ci : MTI filter input clutter power
Co : Output clutter power
(2) MTI Improvement factor
CAS
S
C
C
S
S
C
S
C
SI
i
i
ii
i
0
0
0
0
0
So/Si = |H(w)|2 : average power gain for MTI filter
(9.62)
(9.63)
(9.64)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
MTI Improvement Factor
Gaussian clutter power spectrum
2
22
8exp
22)(
v
fPfW
v
c
(9.65)
Pc : clutter power (constant) c : clutter rms frequency
/2 vc (9.66)
v : rms wind velocity => wind: main reason of clutter freq. spreading
)2exp(2
)( 22 cc
c fP
fW
(9.67)
Clutter power at the input of an MTI filter
dffP
Ccc
co
2
2
2exp
2 (9.68)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
MTI Improvement Factor
Factoring out
Clutter power at output of an MTI
dff
PCcc
ci
2
2
2exp
2
1
ci PC
(9.69)
(9.70)
dffHfWCo2
)()(
(9.71)
Analysis using a single delay line canceller
Single canceller power gain 2
2sin4)(
rf
ffH
(9.72)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
MTI Improvement Factor
Small f, then ratio f/ fr is very small. (ie c
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
MTI Improvement Factor
Substituting eq.(9.76)&(9.70) into (9.62) 2
2
c
r
o
i f
C
CCA
(9.77)
(9.78)
(9.79)
(9.80)
Improvement factor for a single canceller 2
0
2
c
r
i
f
S
SI
Power gain ratio for a single canceller
22
cos221
)(
2/
2/
2
dff
f
ffH
r
r
f
f rr
Using the trigonometric identity 2)(sin4)2cos22(
dff
f
ffH
S
S
r
f
fri
o
r
r
22/
2/
2sin4
1)(
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
MTI Improvement Factor
It follows that 2
22
c
rfI
(9.81) => Only c
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.12 Subclutter Visibility (SCV)
Phrase Subclutter Visibility (SCV)
- radars ability to detect non-stationary targets in a strong clutter background
- used as a measure of MTI performance
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Subclutter Visibility (SCV)
SCV - expressed as the ratio of the improvement factor to the min.MTI output
SCR
Phrase Interclutter Visibility (ICV)
radars ability to detect non-stationary targets between strong clutter points
- > if radar system - resolve the area of strong and weak clutter
oSCRISCV )/(
SCV of two radars not compare their performance
-> target-to-clutter ratio : proportional to the size of the radar resolution
cell and may also be a function of frequency.
ex) Radar system with 10us pulse length & 10o beamwidth : need 20dB more
SCV than Radar system with 1us pulse length & 1o beamwidth.
(9.82)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
9.13 Delay Line Cancellers with Optimal Weights
Delay line canceller transversal FIR filter (tapped delay line filter)
Weights : binomial coefficients -> N-stage cascaded single line cancellers
Binomial coefficient :
1,...,1;)!1()!1(
!)1( 1
Ni
iiN
Nw ii (9.83)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Delay Line Cancellers with Optimal Weights
Using the binomial coefficients produces an MTI filter (approximated optimal
filter) -> maximize the improvement factor
Two equivalent three delay line cancellers
(a) Tapped delay line (b)Three cascaded single line cancellers
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Delay Line Cancellers with Optimal Weights
For example, N=2 (delay line canceller)
N
i r
N
ii f
ffH
S
S
1
2
1
2
10 sin4)(
(9.85)
Average power gain for an N-stage delay line canceller
2
0 sin16
ri f
f
S
S
(9.84)
Rewritten N
r
NN
i f
ffH
S
S2
22
10 sin2)(
(9.86)
Blind speeds for N-stage delay canceller : identical to single cancellers blind speed
Blind speed : independent from the number of cancellers used
...!3
)2)(1(
!2
)1(1
22
20
NNNNNN
S
S
i
(9.87)
RSP Lab Hankuk Aviation Univ.
Delay Line Cancellers with Optimal Weights
General expression by Nathanson
TT
I
23
1
3
41
1
(9.88)
wk & wj : weights of tapped delay line canceller
((k-j)/fr) : correlation coefficient between the kth and jth samples
For example, N = 2
N
k
N
j r
k
io
f
jkww
SSI
j
1 1
* )(
)/(
(9.89)