Upload
fri-research
View
218
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
http://foothillsri.ca/sites/default/files/null/MPBEP_2012_04_Prsnttn_WoodDegradationStandingLodgepolePineHybridLodgepoleJackPineKilledByMPB.pdf
Citation preview
Wood degradation in standing
lodgepole and hybrid
lodgepole-jack pine killed by
mountain pine beetle
Kathy Lewis
Kate Hrinkevich
Background
• “Shelf-life” =
Post-mortality rate of
decay and degradation of
wood quality and quantity
variables
• Rate of change of stand
structure
• Essential for strategic
planning
Research Objectives
• Quantify the relationship between time
since death and measures of wood quality
and quantity, in trees killed by mountain
pine beetle. – Regression models
• Quantify the influence of site factors in
wood deterioration
• Determine rates of tree fall.
Other “shelf-life” factors
• Markets
• Cost of raw material
• Operating costs
• Manufacturing technology
• Log inventories
- Biophysically-based
Multi-phased approach • Synthesis report
– Literature review, interviews from Caribou Plateau outbreak
– Report available (CFS, WP 2005-14)
• Phase I - BC – 0-5 years post-mortality (SBSdk and SBSmc3)
• Phase II - BC – 6-10 years post-mortality (SBSdk)
– Phase I and II report available (CFS, WP 2008-30, Wood and Fiber
Science 43:130-142)
• Phase III - Alberta
– hybrid lodgepole/jack pine – boreal mixed wood
– lodgepole
Study Area – Phase I and II - BC
SBS dk
SBS mc3
2010 samples
2011 samples
Study Areas -
Alberta
Variables
Predictor variables
• Date of Mortality
– Time since death
• Tree size (dbh)
• Site
– Subzone, soil moisture
regime
• Height along the stem
• Stand density
Response variables
• Moisture content (hw/sw)
• Wood density (hw/sw)
• Penetration depth of blue stain fungi
• Number, depth of checks
• Penetration depth of saprot
• Wood borer damage
Time Since Death – External
Indicators, local information
Four Categories
1. Red, bright needles, needles retained
2. Old Red, some needle loss
3. Early Grey, needle and some twig loss
4. Old Grey, all needles gone, most fine twigs gone
Photo by Lorraine Maclauchlan
1. Stand-level surveys • Space – time distribution of mortality
• Fall rate
• Stand and tree attributes
• Select trees for destructive sampling
2. Tree
Level
3 Soil Moisture Regimes
3 Diameter Classes
4 TSD Categories
SBSdk (1-4)
SBSmc (3,4)
~ 600 sample trees
phase I and II
187 sample trees
Alberta
Field Measurements
• Followed MOFR
procedures for
volume and decay
studies (12 cookies (4
in Alberta))
• Each cookie:
diameter, bluestain,
number and depth of
checks, saprot,
woodborers
• Moisture content and
specific gravity (fresh
weight discs 1,2,4,8)
1 2 4 8
Mortality dates via crossdating
• Collect cores from live
trees on sensitive sites
• Prepare cores,
measure rings
• Standardize to remove
age-related growth
trend => master
chronology
• “Pattern match” dead
trees to live chronology
Years to Tree Fall
1. Stand level surveys -
% down at time of
surveying
2. Adjacent tree scar
dates (BC only)
– 30 pairs, phase I, II
only
– Date of death from
fallen tree
– Date of fall from
scarred tree
Scarred live
tree
Results – Stand Level
BEC TSD
(years) # plots
Average
stems/ ha % Pl % Down
SBSdk
0-5 102 980-1225 68-90 <1%
6-10 15 500-1450 60-100 28%
(range = 0-60%)
SBSmc3 0-5 81 1000
-1350 84-94 0
Foothills +
mixed
wood
0-4 17 840-2867 4-65 0-4%
Upper,
Lower
Foothills
1-7 30 252-500 75, 69 <1%
DBH
10 20 30 40 50 60
Year
Die
d
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
DBH
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Year
Die
d
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
SBS mc3
Stand group 3
SBS dk
Stand group 1
Progression of
mortality in a
stand by diameter
Sapwood moisture content grouped by
year of mortality
Years since death
0 2 4 6 8 10
Perc
ent
mois
ture
conte
nt
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
disc 1
disc 2
disc 4
disc 8
dk
Years since death
1 2 3 4 5
Perc
ent
mois
ture
conte
nt
0
20
40
60
80
100
120 disc 1
disc 2
disc 4
disc 8
mc
Time since death
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Pe
rce
nt m
ois
ture
co
nte
nt
0
50
100
150
Alberta-
mixed wood
Heartwood moisture content grouped by year
of mortality dkHeartwood
Years since death
0 2 4 6 8 10
Perc
ent
mois
ture
conte
nt
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
disc 1
disc 2
disc 4
disc 8
mcHeartwood
Years since death
1 2 3 4 5
Perc
ent
mois
ture
conte
nt
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Years since death
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Pe
rce
nt
mo
istu
re c
on
ten
t
0
10
20
30
40
50
Alberta
dk dry dk mesic dk wet mc dry mc mesic mc wet
% M
oist
ure
Con
tent
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
disc1
disc2
disc4
disc8
BEC subzone, soil moisture regime
dk dry dk mesic dk wet mc dry mc mesic mc wet
% M
oist
ure
Con
tent
0
10
20
30
40
50
Sapwood
Heartwood
Moisture
content,
grouped by
bec unit
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Disc1
Disc2Disc3
Alberta – bluestain depth D
ep
th (
cm
)
Years since death
Mixed wood Foothills
Percent of trees with 1 or more
checks – by disc height
Years since death
1 2 3 4 5
Perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
disc 1
disc 2
disc 4
disc 8
Years since death
0 2 4 6 8 10
Pe
rce
nt
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
disc 1
disc 2
disc 4
disc 8
mc dk
Years since death
0 1 2 3 4 5
Perc
ent
trees w
ith c
hecks
0
20
40
60
80
100
Alberta
Time since death (years)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Num
ber
of checks
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
disc 1
disc 2
disc 4
disc 8
Time since death (years)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check d
epth
(cm
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
disc 1
disc 2
disc 4
disc 8
Number and depth
of checks
BC samples
Number
and depth
of checks
Alberta
samples
DBH significantly related to number of checks
and depth of checks, BC data
Alberta data showed significant relationship
only with check depth
Time since death (years)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Pe
rce
nt tr
ee
s w
ith
no
sa
pro
t in
ba
sa
l d
isc (
%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time since death (years)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Pe
rce
nt tr
ee
s w
ith
no
w
oo
db
ore
re in
ba
sa
l d
isc (
%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time since death (years)
0 2 4 6 8 10
Pe
rce
nt tr
ee
s w
ith
no
ch
eckin
g a
t b
rea
st h
eig
ht (%
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sam
ple
siz
e
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
BC samples Alberta samples
Bark integrity category
1.0 2.0 3.0A
vera
ge d
epth
of
checks
0
1
2
3
4
5
bottom
middle
Condition of bark and effect on checking
Bark integrity category
1.0 2.0 3.0
Ave
rage
nu
mb
er
of
ch
ecks
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
bottom
middle
1 = tight
2 = loose
3 = missing
Diameter class (cm)
15 20 25 30 35
Pe
rce
nt d
ow
n
0
10
20
30
40
Percent down, 6-10 YSD, SBS
Years to fall, SBS
Number of years
2 4 6 8 10 12
Nu
mb
er
of
tre
es
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
years since death
years from death to fall
Conclusions
• External indicators of tsd = inaccurate by 4-5
years, especially with smaller trees.
• Mortality in a stand can take place over 5+
years. Pattern of mortality may vary between BC
and Alberta
– BC: early attacks = large (preceded by the small and
weak)
– More recent attacks = remaining small trees
• Only .25% of beetle-killed trees had fallen within
the first 5 years, but rates of fall increased
substantially after 5 years.
Conclusions continued
• Biogeoclimatic unit and soil moisture regime did
not predict decay and degrade in BC, but may
be important with wider ranges of smr.
• Most change in dependent variables occurred in
the first 1-2 years.
• Checks develop first and are worst in the middle
sections of trees.
• Response variables changed with height on the
tree
• Tree size (dbh or merchantable volume) is a
good predictor of decay and degrade (BC).
Years post mortality 0 10
0-6
mo
nth
s, g
reen
wo
od
ch
ara
cte
risti
cs
0-2
years
Rap
id c
heckin
g i
ncre
ase
So
me s
ap
rot
develo
pm
en
t
2-8
years
Peri
od
of
sta
bil
ity i
n w
oo
d
qu
ali
ty
Mo
st
trees r
em
ain
sta
nd
ing
8+
years
Tre
es b
eg
in t
o f
all
Tre
es t
hat
rem
ain
sta
nd
ing
develo
p r
ot
an
d w
oo
db
ore
rs a
t
base