Mozart's Violin

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Mozart's Violin

    1/3

    Mozart's violin

    by Dmitry Badiarov

    Two sound ideals

    Mozart violin - construction of violins, violas and cellos at Mozart's time was different from what it

    is today. Most important was the difference in sound. Actually, there were two sound ideals: one

    was called "human voice" and another "silvery ". The first was considered the most appropriate

    for a concert violin, the second for an orchestral violin.

    Sound ideals between middle of 18th century and till ca.1826

    Existence of two kinds of violins is apparent from Wolfgang's letter to Leopold, which he wrote on

    the 6th October, 1777: "when they *Dubreill - pupil of Tartini, and Carl - his youngest son] began

    to discuss violins for concerts and violins for orchestras, they reasoned very well, and they were

    always of the same opinion as I". Five years later, when Mozart was 26, in 1782, Paduan luthier

    Antonio Bagatella published a violinmaking treatise - "Memoir, or Rules for the construction of

    violins - violas - violoncellos - double basses". He instructed on how to obtain a "silvery voice" or a"human voice". Connoisseur of Mozart P.Lichtenthal mentioned two sound ideals of Mozart's time

    in his "Dictionary of Music", published in 1826. From the above documents it is apparent that two

    kinds of violins existed during a few decades, and it was still remembered in the beginning of the

    19th century.

    Beginning of transformations

    Bagatella was one of the first and the most famous luthiers who made transformations of the old

    baroque violins into "classical" instruments. "I adapted proportions of many old violins, working

    more on old instruments than on instruments which I made myself". According to his Memoirs, he

    started making violins when he was about 19. On Christmas night, 1748, he discovered the rules,

    which became his method. This was probably the time, when the first violin modifications of

    "classical" character took place. It was just before Tartini and Geminiani published their treatises

  • 7/29/2019 Mozart's Violin

    2/3

    on violin playing (1750 and 1751 respectively). A few years later, in 1756, Leopold Mozart

    published his treatise. Same year Wolfgang Mozart was born.

    fig. 1. Small violin - original neck and other original parts are lost. It is furnished with

    modern fingerboard, tailpiece, and bridge

    fig. 2. Viola and violin. Viola has lost its original size. Its original neck and fingerboard are modified

    in the end of the 18th or beginning of the 19th century. The violin has an original neck and an old

    fingerboard, however the neck is thinned. Attribution of all three instruments to Mozart's ex-

    property is too vague to be taken seriously. mozart violin

    Method

    The method of Bagatella is a proportional design, in which all violin parts assembled together in a

    perfect Harmony. He believed that things were not in harmony at HIS time, but they were in

    harmony in the past and he discovered the rules. Thus, to obtain a "human voice" the top of an

    instrument must have an even thickness. To obtain a "silvery voice" the top must be somewhat

    thicker in the middle. So when Bagatella was demanded to create a "human voice" he had to makethe thickness of the top equal. When a "silvery voice" was demanded - the top had to be left

    thicker in the middle, and made thinner toward the ribs. In both cases both outline and

    thicknesses were changed proportionally.

    Unknown criteria

    We can't know how they distinguished between "human" and "silvery" voices. Many of the

    Strads and other instruments had the tops with an equal thickness. Probably the sound of such

    instruments was called "human". Guarneri violin, which was in a possession of Paganini, has a top

    thicker in the middle. Was it called "silvery" at Bagatella's time? Was it called "silvery" even in

    Paganini's hands? This may remain a question forever - one certain thing is that it was a concert

    violin for him.

  • 7/29/2019 Mozart's Violin

    3/3

    Tartini, Bagatella and Mozart

    In 1782, when Bagatella was 49, he was a famous man. He wrote: "I had the opportunity to work

    for Mr. Tartini over the course of approximately thirty years, working both on his own violins as

    well as those of his students. He had numerous pupils who were sent by Princes from all over

    Europe". "I reduced many [violins - D.B.] upon request for Giuseppe Tartini", and "many others

    were made to order for Mr. Tartini and I have no idea where he sent them to". Tartini was a

    famous motivator of the new sound esthetics. Mozart probably heard of Bagatella. It is unlikely

    that Mr. Dubreill should not have mentioned Bagatella, when Wolfgang discussed violins with him.

    Bagatella lists dozens of customer names in the Memoir. Although there are no Mozarts, it is

    possible that Leopold could be among them: "There are many foreigners, whose names I do not

    remember".

    Mozarts instruments

    Leopold, who took the greatest care about musical education of Wolfgang, furnished him with a

    few instruments. Originally "baroque", these instruments were modernized in the 2nd half of the

    18th century. This is the list of instruments, preserved in the Mozart Museum in Salzburg:

    Child Violin (Kindergeige) - in a possession of Mozart Museum since 1896. It is modernized to

    such an extent that it has lost almost all historical interest. (See fig.1)

    Violin - with a false label "Jakobus Stainer, in Absam, / prope Oenipotum, 1659. This violin was

    probably made in Mittenwald in the first half of the 18th century. According to some theories it is

    that violin, which Mozart used it until 1781, however, there is not enough evidence to assume that

    this violin ever belonged to Mozart. (fig.2)

    Viola, labeled "...iouani Paolo Megini/a Brescia. - 161". (fig.2)

    Attribution and lack of evidence

    The problem with all these instruments is that there is not enough evidence to assume that these

    instruments indeed were in Mozarts property. Apart from the above instruments, there are a few

    instruments of doubtful property and attribution preserved in different collections in Europe