Mountainland MPO [PROJECT PRIORITAZION … Reports...Mountainland MPO [PROJECT PRIORITAZION CONCEPT REPORT] MPO Concept Report 5 The design speed of the roundabout will be 25 mph

Mountainland MPO [PROJECT PRIORITAZION CONCEPT REPORT]

MPO Concept Report 1

1.0|ProjectSummaryInformation2.0|ProjectScope3.0|ProjectRanking4.0|AirQualityReport5.0|ProjectCostEstimate6.0|SupplementalInformation

1.0|ProjectSummaryInformation1.1ProjectName(35lettersmax)1200South400WestOrem–RoundaboutImprovements1.2ProjectTypeIntersectionWork1.3Limits(descriptionsshouldbeidentifiable.i.e:intersections,placenames,landmarks,35charactersmax)1200South400WestroundaboutintersectioninOrem1.4ProjectDescription(summaryofproject)Increase the size of the existing roundabout that is a main access to the UVU campus.The roundabout needs to be enlarged because the existing intersection cannot safely handle the growth expected (the UVU campus currently has 26,000 students and is expected to add an additional 15,000 students). The existing roundabout has a design speed of 40 mph. This design speed is not safe for motorists and pedestrians, and the expected increase in vehicle and pedestrian traffic will only make things worse over time if improvements are not made. 1.5Sponsor(jurisdiction,agencyname)City of Orem1.6ProjectManagerPaulGoodrich OfficePhone801.229.7320 CellPhone801.592.4160 Fax801.229.7191 [email protected](includeslocalmatchandadditionalfunds)$2.634 Million PECost$125,000 ROWCost$876,000 ConstructionCost$1,633,000 Fundsalreadyavailabletoproject(lesslocalmatch)$164,000

MPOFederalFundsRequest(includes6.77%localmatch)$2.634 Million

1.8Local/RegionalSignificance Isprojectinlocalgeneralplan?Yes IsprojectinMPOtransportationplan?Supportedinplan IsprojectonacorridorontheUtahStateFunctionalClassMap?Yes1.9AirQualityBenefit(summarizeCM/AQReport,NAfornon-CM/AQeligibleprojects) NA



2.0|ProjectScopeEnterNAforanswerstoquestionsnotapplicabletoyourproject.2.1Describepurposeandneedofproject.The purpose and need for the project is to improve safety and to accommodate the growth of UVU (from 26,000 existing students to 41,000 future students) by enlarging the existing roundaboutat 1200 South and 400 West Orem.2.2Describeexistingservice/conditionsThe existing roundabout does not function well (exising LOS is E-F in the peak hour conditions). Because of the small size of the roundabout some travel movements do not require motorists to slow down and therefore motorists travel through the roundabout at speeds of approximately 40 mph. In addition to the small size of the roundabout it has five legs, which will continue with the new roundabout. However, the new roundabout will have a new NB to EB bypass lane which will allow for better traffic flow. In addition to highway needs there is also a need to improve pedestrian safety. Currently, pedestrians are walking on top of the curb (because there is a retaining wall and no sidewalk) on the west side of 400 West between 1200 South and University Parkway. Access to/from the LDS church is also a safety concern that will be addressed. 2.3HighwayProjectInformation SR#orFA# FA# 2980 BeginningMilePost NA EndMilePost NA Lengthofproject NA ExistingnumberofTravelLanes One

Widthoffacility.See attached layout of the proposed roundabout. The existing roundabout has a center median diameter of approximately 75 feet. The roundabout needs to have a center median diameter of approximately 122 feet to effectively and safely handle the 5-leg intersection.



Facilitysurfacetype. BituminousPavement2.4Transit/PedestrianFacilityProjectInformation Route# 3 transit routes: 830 (2750 riders/day), 811 (265 riders/day), 822 (146 riders/day). Lengthofproject NA Whatistheexpecteduseofthefacilityorprogram? Campus Growth Whatservicesareprovidedintheoperatingofthisproject? NA2.5Describeanyequipmenttobepurchased(buses,ITS,etc.).None2.6Describehowprojectisconsistentwithlocalplans.The project is on the City of Orem adopted Transportation Master Plan.2.7DescribehowprojectisconsistentwithUtahCountyITSplan.The project is consistant with the current ITS plan.2.8Ifphasedorsegmented,describehowthephasehaslogicalterminiandwhatwillfuturephasesconsistof.NA2.9Isprojectbeingcoordinatedwithorconstructedwithalargerproject?NA 2.10Describehowprojectwillalleviatecongestiononthisorotherfacilities.The project will add one new bypass lane (northbound to eastbound). It will also better accommodate the Provo-Orem BRT buses. Indirectly this will result in alleviating congestion on University Parkway.2.11Describeanytrafficimprovements.(i.elanes,signalcoordination,ITS,turnlanes,buspullouts,etc.)The project will add one new bypass lane. Also the roundabout will be larger and easier for buses to maneuver. See 2.12.2.12Describeanysafetyimprovementsforvehicularandpedestriantraffic.(i.e.raisedmedian,channelizationofturnmovements,barriers,parkwaystrips,etc.)



The design speed of the roundabout will be 25 mph. Currently the roundabout has some vehicles traveling through it at approximately 40 mph because the roundabout is so small that there is no need to slow down for some turning movements (see attachment). Sidewalks are anticipated to be added in some locations such as the west side of 400 West between 1200 South and University Parkway. Also, Orem is coordinating with leaders of the LDS Church to improve safety concerns at their parking lot entrances. Raised medians will be installed at some locations and shared turn lanes may be added to minimize conflicting left turn movements. The roundabout will be landscaped.2.13Howarecompletestreetsaddressedwiththisproject?(planforpedestrians,bikes,transit,trails,ITS)The roundabout improvments will include crosswalks, sidewalks, landscaping, and will accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit.2.14Describetrafficcontrolchangesatintersections.(includeinfotowarrantchanges)Traffic control remains the same.2.15Whatright-of-wayisalreadysecured?None2.16Whatadditionalright-of-wayisneeded?Property is needed from UVU; the LDS Church; Boyer Lake Pointe, LC; and one private property owner (home on the northeast corner of the intersection). Orem City will acquire the ROW prior to construction.2.17Describeutilityworktobeperformedandindicatewhowilldothework.Utility work will be determined during final design. It is anticipated that the contractor will complete needed utility work.2.18Whattypeofenvironmentalworkwillmostlikelybeneeded?CategoricalExclusion2.19FacilityDesign

CurrentConditions

DesignYear2040

DesignYearw/oImprovements

AverageDailyTraffic 12,750 18,500 16,000

LevelofService E/F D F

FunctionalClass Collector Collector Collector



DesignSpeed 40 mph 20 mph 40 mph

*AccidentRate 17.34 3.00 25.0

TransitRidership 3161 12,000 12,000

Ped/TrailUsage 200 800 800

ParkandRideUsage NA NA NA



3.0|ProjectRankingThefollowingcategorieswillbeusedbyMPOstafftoscoreeachproject.ThepointsassociatedwitheachcategoryshowwhattotalpointsMPOstaffcangive.MPOstaff’srecommendationswillbemadeavailabletotheMPOTACCommitteefortheiruseinmakingfinalprojectselectionrecommendations.MPOstaffrankingisatooltoaidtheMPOTACCommitteeintheirfinalselection.ThecommitteeisnotrequiredtopickprojectssolelyonMPOstaffranks.Pleasenote,ifquestionspertinenttotheprojectarenotanswered,zeropointswillbegiven.

3.1CongestionRelief(25Points)Explainiftheproject…a) Providesanalternatetransportationfacilitythatcorrectsanidentifiedcongestedproblem?

Alargerroundaboutwillhandleincreasedtrafficvolumefromcampusgrowth.ThisprojectwillallowtransittofunctionbetterwhichishelpingtoalleviatecongestiononUniversityParkway.

b) Reducescongestionbyreducingthenumberofvehicles.Notdirectly.However,itispartoftheProvo-OremBRTrouteandBRTwillreducethenumberofvehiclesusingUniversityParkway.

c) Reducestheneedforadditionalhighwaylanesforpeakhourcapacity.NA

d) Increasestheefficiencyoftransportationsystemthroughtrafficmanagementmeasures.EfficiencyisincreasedbyimprovingtheintersectionLOSandmitigatingsafetyproblems.

e) Addsturningmovementstorelieveacongestedintersection.Yes.Anadditionalbypasslane(northboundtoeastbound)willbeaddedtotheintersection.Also,drivewayswhichareaccessingtheLDSchurcharecreatingcongestionandsafetyissuesatcertaintimes.ImprovingtheLDSchurchaccesswillalsobeaddressed.

f) Designyearnumberofusers.UsersincludetheaverageAADTforhighwaysandusersperdayfortransit,trails,andotherprojects.18,500 vehicles + 800 peds + 12,000 transit = 31,300

g) 2020V/Cdata(computedbyMPOstaff)0.21 to 0.61

3.2ModeChoice(25points)Explainiftheproject…a) Benefitsmultipletransportationsystems(transitandhighway,pedestrianandtransit).Yes.It

willbetteraccommodatebuses,automobiles,andpedestrians.Bymakingtheroundaboutlarger,BRTbuseswilloperatemoreefficiently.Also,itwillmaketheroundaboutsaferbyreducingtravelspeedsthroughtheroundabout.ANBtoEBbypasslanewillalsobeaddedwhichwillimprovethetrafficflow.Sidwalkwillbeaddedtobetteraccommodatepedestrians.



b) PromotesalternativetransportationsolutiontoSOVuse.

Notdirectlyatthesubjectintersection.However,itispartoftheProvo-OremBRTrouteandBRTwillreducethenumberofSOVvehiclesusingUniversityParkway.

c) Createsorimproveslinkagesbetweentransportationmodes.ImproveslinkagestotheUVUCampus.

d) Reducesphysical,psychological,oreconomicbarrierstocarpool,bike,walk,ortransituse.A40mphdesignspeedisnotsafeforpedestrians.Theproposed25mphdesignspeedwillfeelmuchsafer.Sidewalkwillalsobeinstalledatspecificlocations.

e) Providesincentivestocarpool,bike,walk,ortransituse.Indirectly.ItispartoftheProvo-OremBRTroute.

3.3EnvironmentalQuality(15points)Explainiftheproject…a) Providescosteffectiveemissionreductions(amountofreductionjustifiescost).

ItimprovestrafficflowthroughtheintersectionatabetterLOSanddecreasedcongestionontheapproachstreets.

b) Helpseffortstoattainandmaintainnationalairqualitystandards.ImprovestrafficflowthroughtheintersectionatanimprovedLOS.

c) Minimizesenvironmentalimpactsorreducesexistingimpacts(e.g.air/water/noisepollution).Whentheenvironmentaldocumentispreparedstepswillbeidentifiedtominimizeimpacts.Theimpactsareunknownatthistime.

d) Enhancesthenatural,cultural,orhistoricenvironment.Roundaboutwillbelandsacped.

e) Mitigatesinvasiveimpactstoexistingneighborhoods/commercialareas(minimalrelocations).Oneresidentialrelocationisanticipatedwiththisproject.TheprojectwillimproveaccesstothestripmallandtheLDSchurch.Sidewalkswillalsobeinstalledatneededlocations.Ingeneral,theprojectshouldimprovetheneighborhoodbyimproving:trafficflowattheroundabout,accesstobusinessesandtheLDSchurch,pedestriansafetybyaddingsidewalkswhereneeded.

3.4Safety(20points)Explainiftheproject…a) Corrects/improvesaverifiedorpotentialsafetyoraccidentproblem.

The40mphdesignspeedoftheroundaboutisnotsafe.Thedesignspeedwillbereducedto25mph.Itimprovesapotentialsafeyproblembyforcingmotoriststodriveslowerthroughtheroundabout.Itwillalsoaddressconflictingturningmovementsconcernson400West.



Pedestriansafetywillalsobeimprovedbyaddingsidewalkswhereneeded,suchasthewestsideof400West.OremhasmetwithLDSchurchleaderswhousethebuildingatthisintersection.Theyhaveidentifiedsafetyconcernsthattheirmembersencounterenteringandexitingtheparkinglot.Theseissueswillbeaddressed.

b) Improvesinformation/communicationsfortrafficoperationsandemergencyresponders.Theprojectwillbetteraccommodateemergencyrespondersbyreducingcongestionattheintersectionandbymakingtheroundaboutturningradiuslarger.

c) Reducesseverityofcrashes.Severityofcrashedwillbereducedwithlowerintersectiondesignspeed.

d) Enhancessafemovementofpedestrian,bicycletraffic.Accommodating pedestrians and bicyclists will be a key part of the design. Sidewalk will be added to the west side of 400 West between 1200 South and University Parkway. Currently pedestrians are walking on the curb in this area. Safety of pedestrians and cyclysts will also be improved with a lower intersection design speed.

e) Providesanintermodalsafetyimprovement(e.g.separationofvehicles-trains,vehicles-

pedestrian).Vehicle/pedestrianseperationwillbeprovidedwithraisedmediansthatapproachtheroundabout.

3.5OtherConsiderations(15points)Explainiftheproject…a) EffectivelydistributesfundingthroughouttheMPOarea.

UVUisaregionalcampus.Studentsthroughouttheregiondriveortaketransittothecampus.

b) PhasesprojectinamannerthattheMPOcanuselimitedfundsefficiently.Yes.Oremwillcompletetheneededenvironmentalstudyandwillacquiretheneededrightofwaypriortoconstruction.ConstructionmaybecompletedbytheProvo-OremBRTprojectcontractor.Itisanticipatedthatthiswillresultinareducedconstructioncost.

c) Costeffectivenessisappropriatefortheamountofimprovementmade.Themaincampusneedstogrowverseshavingallgrowthatsatelitecampuslocations.

d) Benefitstransportationusersfromadjacentmunicipalities.Yes.UVUisaregionalcampus.Studentsthroughouttheregiondriveortaketransittothecampus.

e) Issupportedbyelectedofficials.



Yes-itisontherecentlyadoptedCityofOremTransportationMasterPlan.



4.0|AirQualityReportAllprojectsthatareeligibleforCM/AQandCM/AQ-PM2.5fundsmustcompletethisreport(seeCM/AQEligibilitylistatwww.mountainland.org/tipselection).Thesefundsareeligibleforprojectsandprogramscountywide.

4.1EligibilityCM/AQfundscanonlybeusedforprojectsandprogramsthatadirectbenefittoairqualitycanbedemonstrated.Highwayexpansion,suchasnewsingleoccupancyvehiclelanes,isnoteligible.Turnlanesatcongestedintersections,transitprograms,pedestrianandtrailprojects,signalmodernization,ITS,andIMprogramsaretypicaleligibleCM/AQprojects.4.2CM/AQProgramThepurposeoftheCM/AQprogramistofundtransportationprojectsorprogramsthatwillcontributetoattainmentormaintenanceoftheNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)inOzone(O3),Carbonmonoxide(CO),ParticulateMatter–10microns(PM10),andPM2.5non-attainmentandmaintenanceareas.ThecityofProvoisamaintenanceareaforCOandUtahCountyisanon-attainmentareaforPM10andPM2.5.4.3CompletingthisReportAllprojectseligibleforCM/AQfundsmustcompletethisreport.Completingthisreportcanbequitetechnical,SusanHardy,AirQualityCoordinatoratMountainland,canhelpwithfillingoutthisreport.Contactherat801/229-3842orshardy@mountainland.org4.4QuantitativeAnalysesAquantitativeassessmentofhowaproposedprojectorprogramisexpectedtoreduceemissionsisimportanttoassistinselectingthemosteffectiveuseofthisfund.Listbelowalltravelbenefitsdirectlyrelatedtothisproject.AirqualitybenefitcalculationsmustutilizeMobile6.Theairqualityanalysisshouldincludeassessingemissionreductionsoftransit,trafficflowimprovements,ITSprojectsandprograms,ridesharing,bicycleandpedestrianimprovements.Completeatleastoneofthesectionsbelow.Ifquantitativeanalysescannotbedone,doaqualitativeassessmentin4.3. a)VehicleMilesTraveled

NumberofVehicleMilesTraveledreduced(VMT):Clickheretoentertext.Averagedistanceoftripsreduced:Clickheretoentertext.Emissionreductionperaverageweekday:Clickheretoentertext.b)IdlingTimeAverageidlingtimepervehiclereduced:Clickheretoentertext.Numberofvehicleswithreducedidlingtime:Clickheretoentertext.Emissionreductionperaverageweekday:Clickheretoentertext.C)VehicleSpeedAveragechangeinvehiclespeed(speedbeforeandafter):Clickheretoentertext.Numberofvehiclesaffected:Clickheretoentertext.Emissionreductionperaverageworkday:Clickheretoentertext.



4.5QualitativeAssessmentAlthoughaquantitativeanalysesofairqualityimpactsisrequiredwheneverpossible,someimprovementsmaynotlendthemselvestorigorousquantitativeanalysis,becauseoftheprojectscharacteristicsorbecausepracticalexperienceislackingtoadequatelyanalyzetheproject.Inthesecases,aqualitativeassessmentbasedonareasonandlogicalexaminationofhowtheprojectorprogramwilldecreaseemissionsandcontributetoattainmentormaintenanceofaNAAQSisappropriate.Clickheretoentertext.



5.0|ProjectCostEstimateTodevelopmentaprojectcostestimate,pleasesupplyadetailedcostbreakdownofyourunitcosts,inflation,equipment,right-of-way,contingency,etc.Todoso,usetheConceptCostsEstimateExcelformprovidedbyUDOT(availableatwww.mountainland.org/tipselection).Non-constructionprojectssuchasequipmentpurchases,operations,administrationprograms,studies,etc.canuseothermethodstoshowtheirestimatedcosts.AllsheetsormethodsusedshouldbesubmittedaspartoftheSupplementalInformationaccompanyingtheConceptReport.

5.1CostSummarySummarizetheinformationfromtheCostsEstimateExcelformorothermethod.EnterNAforitemsthatdonotapplytotheproject.a)PreliminaryEngineering$125,000b)EnvironmentalWork$15,000c)Construction$2,083,000d)UDOTReview(projectcost<$500k=$5k,>500K=$10k)NAe)ConstructionEngineering$150,000f)Subtotal$2,373,000g)InflatedCostFactor(inflatetoyearofconstruction)1.11h)TotalProjectCost(entertotalcost,notfundingrequest))$2.634 Millioni)AdditionalFunds(lesslocalmatch)AvailabletoProject$164,000j)MPOFederalFundsRequest(includes6.77%localmatch)$2.634 Million

6.0|SupplementalInformationPleasesubmitanysupportingdocumentationincludingmaps,diagrams,charts,costestimates,etc.thatwillallowMPOandUDOTstaffandanyTechnicalAdvisoryCommitteetomakeaninformeddecisionregardingtheproposedproject.KeepSupplementalInformationsubmittalsto8pagestotal.

6.1ConceptReportSubmittalInordertofacilitatethedistributionoftheConceptReportsandanysupplementalinformation,allConceptReportswithleadershipsignature,shallbecombinedwithanysupplementalinformationandsavedinPDFformatasonedocument.Pleasenotethatthismightcreatealargedatafilethatmightbetoolargetoemailed.Planaccordinglytosubmityourreportinelectronicformat(CD,DVD,FlashDrive)bytherequiredduedate.ConceptReportsareduebyThursday03/24/2016at6pm.6.2Contacts,QuestionsForhelpwiththeConceptReportorquestions,pleasecontact:

BobAllen,AICP586East800North,OremUT84651p.801/229-3813f.801/[email protected]

ShawnEliot,AICP586East800North,Orem,UT84097p.801/229-3841f.801/[email protected]

Prepared By: Paul Goodrich - Orem City Date 3/23/16

Proposed Project Scope:

Approximate Route Reference Mile Post (BEGIN) = (END) =

Project Length = 0.000 miles ft

Current FY Year (July-June) = 2017

Assumed Construction FY Year = 2018

Construction Items Inflation Factor = 1.11 1 yrs for inflation

Assumed Yearly Inflation for Engineering Services (PE and CE) (%/yr) = 3.0%

Assumed Yearly Inflation for Right of Way (%/yr) = 3.0%

Items not Estimated (% of Construction) = 20.0%

Preliminary Engineering (% of Construction + Incentives) = 10.0%

Construction Engineering (% of Construction + Incentives) = 12.0%

Construction Items Cost Remarks

Public Information Services $5,000

Roadway and Drainage $1,006,462

Traffic and Safety $0

Structures $0

Environmental Mitigation $0

ITS $0

Subtotal $1,011,462Items not Estimated (20%) $202,292

Construction Subtotal $1,213,754

P.E. Cost P.E. Subtotal $121,375 10%

C.E. Cost C.E. Subtotal $145,650 12%

Right of Way Right of Way Subtotal $850,000

Utilities Utilities Subtotal $0

Incentives Incentives Subtotal $0

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Subtotal $0

Cost Estimate (ePM screen 505)

P.E. $121,000 $125,000

Right of Way $850,000 $876,000

Utilities $0 $0

Construction $1,214,000 $1,351,000

C.E. $146,000 $150,000

Incentives $0 $0

Aesthetics 0.75% $9,000 $10,000

Change Order Contingency 9.00% $110,000 $122,000

UDOT Oversight $0 $0

Miscellaneous $0 $0

TOTAL $2,450,000 TOTAL $2,634,000

TOTAL $2,450,000 TOTAL $2,634,000

1 8

2 9

3 10

4 11

5 12

6 13

7 14

Project Assumptions/Risks

PIN: PROJECT # PROJECT NAME: 1200 South 400 West Orem - Roundabout Improvements

Cost Estimate - Concept Level

2017 2018

Increase the size and improve the existing roundabout

PROPOSED COMMISSION REQUEST

3/23/16 Page 1 of 1Concept Level Est Form

Rev. 7/31/2013

Item # Item Quantity Units Price Cost Remarks

Roadway012850010 Mobilization 1 Lump $89,054.00 $89,054.00 Usually 7-10% of construction

015540005 Traffic Control 1 Lump $44,527.00 $44,527.00 Usually 3-5% of construction

Signing and Striping 1 Lump $44,527.00 $44,527.00

015720020 Dust Control and Watering 0 1000 gal

018920050 Reconstruct Manhole 5 Each $723.00 $3,615.00

020560005 Borrow (Plan Quantity) 0 cu yd

020560010 Borrow 0 Ton

020560015 Granular Borrow (Plan Quantity) 0 cu yd

020560020 Granular Borrow 0 Ton

020560025 Granular Backfill Borrow (Plan Quantity) 0 cu yd

022210015 Remove Bridge Each

022210080 Remove Fence ft

022210095 Remove Pipe Culvert ft

022210110 Remove Concrete Sidewalk 8,757 sq yd $10.00 $87,570.00

022210125 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter 3,264 ft $3.00 $9,792.00

022210165 Remove Asphalt Pavement 547 sq yd $54.00 $29,538.00

022310010 Clearing and Grubbing Lump

023160020 Roadway Excavation (Plan Quantity) 7,487 cu yd $14.00 $104,818.00

027120010 Lean Concrete Base Course, 4 inch thick 0 sq yd

027210010 Untreated Base Course 0 Ton

027210020 Untreated Base Course (Plan Quantity) 1,274 cu yd $48.00 $61,152.00

027350010 Micro-Surfacing 0 sq yd

02737001* Asphalt Pavement Soft Spot Repair - Type A sq yd

02737002* Asphalt Pavement Soft Spot Repair - Type B sq yd

027410060 HMA - 3/4 Inch 2,486 Ton $77.00 $191,422.00

027480010 Liquid Asphalt MC-70 or MC-250 0 Ton Prime Coat

027480040 Emulsified Asphalt CSS-1 0 Ton Tack Coat

027520020 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement 9 inch Thick 0 sq yd

027710025 Concrete Curb and Gutter Type B1 3,689 ft $21.00 $77,469.00

027710110 Reconstruct Pedestrian Access Ramp 11 Each $2,060.00 $22,660.00

027760010 Concrete Sidewalk 6,344 sq ft $5.00 $31,720.00

027760020 Concrete Median Filler 12,215 sq ft $5.00 $61,075.00

027760038 Concrete Driveway Flared, 6 inch Thick 333 sq ft $7.00 $2,331.00

027850020 Chip Seal Coat, Type II 0 sq yd

027850060 Emulsified Asphalt LMCRS-2 0 Ton Chip Seal Emulsion

027850075 Emulsified Asphalt HFMS-2P 0 Ton Flush Coat

027860010 Open Graded Surface Course Ton

027860020 Asphalt Binder PG 64-34 0 Ton OGSC Binder

028220030 Right-of-Way Fence, Type D (Metal Post) ft

029610020 Rotomilling - 1 Inch 0 sq yd

Relocate Lighting 2 Each $7,725.00 $15,450.00

Remove Sign Structure 1 Each $2,500.00 $2,500.00

Relocate Power Pole 1 Each $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Landscaping 4,830 sq ft $6.00 $28,980.00

Bonded Wearing Course 5,098 sq yd $5.00 $25,490.00

Demolish Existing Home 1 Each $50,000.00 $50,000.00

Roadway Subtotal $993,690

Drainage022210030 Remove Catch Basin 4 Each $567.00 $2,268.00

023730010 Loose Riprap cu yd

026101386 18 Inch Irrigation/Storm Drain, Class C, smooth ft



026330130 Concrete Drainage Structure 5 ft to 7 ft deep - CB 9 Each

026330380 Shallow Catch Basin - CB3 4 Each $3,193.00 $12,772.00

Drainage Subtotal $12,772

PI013150010 Public Information Services 1 Lump $5,000.00 $5,000 Usually 0.25% of construction

Roadway and DrainagePIN: PROJECT # PROJECT NAME: 1200 South 400 West Orem - Roundabout Improvements


Rev. 7/31/2013

Orem 1200 South / 400 West Existing Roundabout

Orem 1200 South / 400 West Future Roundabout

2162 West Grove ParkwaySuite 400Pleasant Grove, UT 84062(801) 763-5100

DATE

DRAWN3/15/2016Utah Valley University

0.125 0 0.125Miles

J:\Ke

vin W

\UVU

Cou

nts\O

rem Q

ueing

- 11x

17.m

xd, 3

/15/20

16 2:

56:29

PM,

kevin

c

Figure 2 Average Peak Period Queue Lengths

LegendQueue Lengths

Average Queue Length

Count Locations89:D Intersection Count

: Roundabout Count

))!!!!!! Signal Count

Business Park Dr.

Geneva Road

University Parkway

400 West

College Drive

800 South

1200 South

Wolverine Way

725 West

600 West

960 South

800 West

Campus Drive

1200 West

1000 South

900 South

Sandhill Rd

Orem1200South/400WestRoundabout.LookingWest.

Orem1200South/400WestRoundabout.LookingEast.

Orem1200South/400WestRoundabout.LookingNorth.

Orem1200South/400WestRoundabout.DirectionalSignandRaisedMedians.

Prepared By: Paul Goodrich - Orem City Date 4/2/16

Proposed Project Scope:

Approximate Route Reference Mile Post (BEGIN) = (END) =

Project Length = 0.000 miles ft

Current FY Year (July-June) = 2017

Assumed Construction FY Year = 2019

Construction Items Inflation Factor = 1.16 2 yrs for inflation

Assumed Yearly Inflation for Engineering Services (PE and CE) (%/yr) = 3.0%

Assumed Yearly Inflation for Right of Way (%/yr) = 3.0%

Items not Estimated (% of Construction) = 20.0%

Preliminary Engineering (% of Construction + Incentives) = 10.0%

Construction Engineering (% of Construction + Incentives) = 12.0%

Construction Items Cost Remarks

Public Information Services $5,000

Roadway and Drainage $1,006,462

Traffic and Safety $0

Structures $0

Environmental Mitigation $0

ITS $0

Subtotal $1,011,462Items not Estimated (20%) $202,292

Construction Subtotal $1,213,754

P.E. Cost P.E. Subtotal $121,375 10%

C.E. Cost C.E. Subtotal $145,650 12%

Right of Way Right of Way Subtotal $850,000

Utilities Utilities Subtotal $0

Incentives Incentives Subtotal $0

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Subtotal $0

Cost Estimate (ePM screen 505)

P.E. $121,000 $128,000

Right of Way $850,000 $902,000

Utilities $0 $0

Construction $1,214,000 $1,412,000

C.E. $146,000 $155,000

Incentives $0 $0

Aesthetics 0.75% $9,000 $10,000

Change Order Contingency 9.00% $110,000 $128,000

UDOT Oversight $0 $0

Miscellaneous $0 $0

TOTAL $2,450,000 TOTAL $2,735,000

TOTAL $2,450,000 TOTAL $2,735,000

1 8

2 9

3 10

4 11

5 12

6 13

7 14

PIN: PROJECT # PROJECT NAME: 1200 South 400 West Orem - Roundabout Improvements

Cost Estimate - Concept Level

2017 2019

Increase the size and improve the existing roundabout

PROPOSED COMMISSION REQUEST

Project Assumptions/Risks


Rev. 7/31/2013

Documents

Mountainland MPO [PROJECT PRIORITAZION … Reports...Mountainland MPO [PROJECT PRIORITAZION CONCEPT REPORT] MPO Concept Report 5 The design speed of the roundabout will be 25 mph