Upload
dangdieu
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Contents
3 Current Real Estate Scenario
6 Funding Sources for Real Estate Projects
9 Direct V/s. Indirect Investing
16 About Motilal Oswal Real Estate
21 Key Emerging Trends
2
o Residential sales declined across the seven leading cities of the country, largely due to
high price points, sticky interest rates and cautious buyer sentiments
o Keeping in mind subdued end-user/investor sentiments, many developers in major
markets have abstained from launching new projects, and instead directed their focus
towards reducing the existing inventory pile-up
o While the sector is currently facing short term challenges, the Indian real estate story
will remain intact due to its inherent strong fundamentals, favorable demographics,
high domestic savings, focus on infrastructure and continued urbanization will boost
the demand of residential real estate
o Our view is that time correction is underway for past 2 years and may continue for
another 1 – 2 years. The recent rate cuts should augur well for the real estate sector
as it translates into an eventual reduction in mortgage rates; and with economic
revival expected to improve buyer affordability, residential sales shall resume its
upward trend
Current Residential Market Scenario
o With offshoots of economic recovery visible, office market turned the corner in 2014
and is poised for further improvement in 2015
o In terms of absorption of 8.5 mn sq. ft. (in Q1’2015), Bengaluru leads the pack (3.82
mn sq. ft.) followed by NCR-Delhi, Gurgaon and Noida (1.48 mn sq. ft.), Mumbai (1.33
mn sq. ft.), Pune (0.89 mn sq. ft.) and Chennai (0.81 mn sq. ft.)
o E Commerce, IT / ITES and BFSI are the primary sectors driving the demand
o With an expanding economy, improving business sentiment and increasing job
creations, the momentum in demand for office real estate is expected to stay.
However, developer sentiment towards speculative construction of office buildings
is expected to remain cautious, and this in turn will limit the risk of further
overbuilding
Current Commercial Market Scenario
Land financing with
collateral / cash flows
from the land parcel
Financing structured
when the project has
been delayed and
existing facilities need
to be repaid, against
future cash flows
Funds raised from
Lenders for construction
of the Project
A short term loan to
meet immediate
requirement for
approvals/ pre
construction expenses
before a long term
funding is secured
Funds raised from
NBFCs/FIs against a
specific stream of future
cash-flow
Real Estate Funding
Land Financing Pre Approval Expenses
Financing
Construction
Financing Equity Takeout Refinancing
1 2 3 4 5
Real Estate Funding Requirements
Land Financing Pre Approval Expenses
Financing
Construction
Financing Equity Takeout Refinancing
• Restricted end use of funds
• Governed by RBI
• Draw down post all project approvals
• Pre defined use of money towards
construction of project
• Heavy monitoring on usages of capital
• Typically these deals are foray of banks
• First charge on land and all cash flows
• Typical yields of ~ 14%
• Regulated still slight flexibility in usage
of money
• Majority of money post all project
approvals
• Money can be used in the project or can
be used for general corporate purpose
• Focussed on security cover and cash
flow cover & not so much on usage of
capital
• First charge on land and all cash flows
• Typical yields of 16 - 18%
• Flexible money
• Can be used to acquire land
• Risk appetite high
• Can be structured to ensure regular
small coupon to investor along with
upside as equity kicker
• Focus on cash flow cover and security
cover
• Typical yields of ~ 23-25%
Bank Debt
(Senior, low yield)
NBFC Debt / Fund / HNI Funding
(Flexible, High yield)
Structured Debt / Equity
(Flexible, High Yield)
Funding Sources of Real Estate Projects
Equity / structured debt at pre approval stage with 6-7% p.a. higher returns as compared to debt at post approval stage provides
better risk adjusted returns as approval timelines and risk has reduced over the last couple of years
Increase in Prices Over Last 3 Years (CAGR - Q1’12 – Q1’15)
Delhi NCR
Mumbai
Bangalore
Chennai
MMR 3 Yrs 1 Yr
Mumbai 9% 1%
Navi Mumbai 4% 2%
Thane 8% 2%
Pune
Source: Propequity
Pune 3 Yrs 1 Yr
Pune 7% 4%
NCR 3 Yrs 1 Yr
Gurgaon 12% 6%
Noida 5% -2%
Greater Noida 5% 0%
Ghaziabad 4% 1%
Bangalore 3 Yrs 1 Yr
Bangalore 9% 4%
Chennai 3 Yrs 1 Yr
Chennai 5% 3%
Real Estate Sector across India is going through a sluggish phase. The trend, expected to continue for some more time,
may reverse as the economic growth gathers momentum and interest rates decline further
11
Direct Investment - Returns since 2012
Value of the property to be acquired 5.00
Other Costs Involved (Stamp Duty, Registration, Vat,
Service Tax, etc) - 10% 0.50
Total Costs for acquiring the property 5.50
Investment through Own Sources (100%) 5.50
Increase in Property Prices Over Last 3 Years* 30%
Increase in value of Property at the end of 3 years 1.50
Value of Property at the end of 3 years 6.50
Less: Brokerage to be Paid on sale (@ 1%) (0.07)
Net Realization 6.44
Profit from sale of Property 0.94
Capital Gains Tax on Sale of Property ** 0.00
Net Profit After Tax 0.94
% Increase in Own Capital over 3 years 17%
Annual Increase in Own Capital (CAGR) 5.4%
* Best Case Scenario ** It is assumed that the investment was made in 2011 and the Property is sold in 2015. Therefore based on the cost-inflation Index, the indexed cost of acquisition shall be greater than the sale price assumed and hence no tax shall be levied
Date Payment (%) Actual Payment
Apr-12 20% (1.10)
Oct-12 20% (1.10)
Apr-13 15% (0.83)
Oct-13 15% (0.83)
Apr-14 15% (0.83)
Oct-14 10% (0.55)
Apr-15 5% (0.28)
May-15 Sold 6.44
IRR 8.7%
Calculation of Absolute Return (In Rs. Crs.) Calculation of IRR for Investor***
*** It has been assumed that the investment was in an under construction property and is completed in 3 years. Therefore payment is construction linked
Going forward, given the sluggishness in the sector, prices are expected to remain stagnant. Therefore returns shown above may contract further
Direct Investment V/s. Indirect Investment through a Fund
Real Estate Investments Direct
Investment Indirect
Investment
Asset diversification
Geographic diversification
Developer diversification
Power of collective negotiations;
providing substantially lower entry
points
Securing preferred repayment of
capital out of project
Higher due diligence
Active & effective asset management
& control
Low overhead costs
Investment making discretion
Investment through Fund provides multifold advantages as compared to direct investment
Project Cashflows and Returns
13
Indirect Investment by a Fund (Mezzanine Transaction)
Rs Crs Rs psft
Total Saleable Area 383328 sq. ft.
Sales revenue 284 7,419
Outflows
Land and approval cost (89) (2,315)
Construction cost (86) (2,231)
Admin Overheads (3) (89)
Marketing cost (9) (223)
Interest on construciton loan (0) (1)
Net profit before Fund interest and tax 98 2,560
Add: Land and approval cost 89
Less: Income tax (16)
Balance surplus cashflows 171 A
Fund Servicing (as per repayment schedule)
- Principal 60
- Income for the Fund* 51
Total Fund Servicing 111 B
Security Cover for fund (x) 1.5 A / B
• Expected return for the fund: ~ 24% IRR,
broken into two parts
o ~ 17% IRR through regular quarterly
coupon
o Balance 7% IRR through sale of
identified inventory allocated to fund
at zero cost
The Fund is expected to achieve an IRR of
24% at a sale price of Rs 6,960 psft in 2019
whereas the developer is planning to launch
the project in March 2016 at Rs 7,000 psft
Mezzanine structure is a win-win for both
developer and fund
o Fixed cost for developer is lower
o Fund achieves its desired IRR through
regular coupons and identified
inventory along with security of
project land, escrow, PDCs, etc
14 14
Even assuming a marginal year on year
increase of 3% from current market price,
the fund is expected to make post tax IRR
of 24% (pre tax equivalent of ~ 36%
assuming tax rate of 33.99%)
This is possible because while the prices
are expected to remain flattish, the
developer still makes profit as the land
cost is adjusted accordingly. Yields are also
higher for the fund because of efficient tax
structuring
A fund participates in the profit sharing
with developer rather than banking
completely on the future price increase
Indirect Investment by a Fund (Equity Transaction)
Entry Valuation for Fund Rs Crs
Land market value 78
Approval cost till date 12
Total current valuation 90 A
Investment by Fund
- Cash out to Developer 57
- Working capital 10 B
Total Investment 67
Project Profitability Rs Crs Rs psft
Total Saleable Area 1.9 mn sq. ft.
Revenue 759 3,992 A
Land cost (78) (410)
Approvals (20) (105)
Construction Cost (436) (2,294)
Other Admin Expenses (17) (92)
Marketing Expenses (15) (80)
Brokerage (15) (80)
Total cost (582) (3,061) B
Pre Interest and tax cash flows 177 931 C = A+B
Interest on construction finance (2) (11) D
Pre tax cashflows 175 921 E = C+D
Add: contribution towards land & approvals 90
Add: Working capital infused 10
Gross cashflows available for distribution 275
Investment by Fund and Developer 100
Pre tax multiple (x) 2.75
Pre tax IRR 42.1%
Post tax Fund IRR 24.0%
15
Outlook For Indirect Investing
Equity Transactions:
Going forward, while the near
term outlook for real estate is not
very encouraging, we believe that
the sector has the potential to
witness good growth as the
economy revives and interest
rates decline
In the current market scenario,
Equity transactions provides an
opportunity to partner with
Grade A developers and may
result in much higher IRRs as
compared to debt transactions
where upside is capped
Mezzanine Transactions:
Mezzanine transactions at land
stage shall continue to be a
preferred way of investing capital
It provides regular coupon and
debt like securities along with an
equity kicker
While this structure was
uncommon couple of years ago
given significant approval risk,
this space is going to be more
crowded as approval process has
become relatively simplified and
newer funds shall start investing
through this structure
Debt Transactions:
As interest rates decline,
investment under this structure is
going to become unattractive
Yields under this structure is also
expected to contract as there are
numerous players (Banks, NBFCs,
HNIs) operating within this
structures
Full marginal tax applicable on
the interest earns makes it even
more less rewarding as compared
to equity / mezzanine structure
About Motilal Oswal Real Estate (MORE)
MORE is the real estate arm of Motilal Oswal Group, which focuses on investments in the real estate
projects and managed third party Funds
India Realty Excellence Fund I
Rs 200 cr; focus on equity investments
78% capital returned
India Realty Excellence Fund II
Rs 500 cr fully raised; focus on early
stage secured mezzanine investments
Currently in the last leg of
disbursement, expected to be
completed in H1CY2015
India Realty Excellence Fund III
Rs 750 cr; will focus on mezzanine &
structured equity investment structures
Funds
17
Transactions Concluded under IREF II
18
Delhi NCR
Mumbai
Bangalore
Chennai Development Type Residential
Location Alandur
Size 3,80,000 sq. ft.
Investment Size INR 58 Crore
Investment Type Mezzanine
Development Type Residential
Location Noida
Size 6,20,000 sq. ft.
Investment Size INR 72 Crore
Investment Type Mezzanine
Development Type Residential
Location Ambernath
Size 2.6 mn sq. ft.
Investment Size INR 86 Crore
Investment Type Mezzanine
Development Type Residential
Location Vikhroli
Size 1,10,000 sq. ft.
Investment Size INR 41 Crore
Investment Type Mezzanine
Development Type Residential
Location Across Bangalore
Size 1.5 mn sq. ft.
Investment Size INR 62 Crore
Investment Type Mezzanine
Development Type Residential
Location Budigere Cross
Size 2 mn sq. ft.
Investment Size INR 67 Crore
Investment Type Equity
India Realty Excellence Fund – Our First Fund
India Realty Excellence Fund (IREF), a domestic real
estate fund was closed in December 2009
IREF Investment Strategy
Focus on residential assets with compelling
valuations
Leveraging strong asset management expertise
Emphasis on leveraging cyclical nature of the
industry and self liquidating nature of investments
Opportunistic investments in commercial and
other classes of real estate assets which are
underserviced
Focus on “Next-Gen” players which have good
execution capabilities
Achieve superior returns by investing capital
through equity and/or equity related instruments
in core projects
~200 Size of domestic real estate fund
(INR crore)1
7 Investments across Mumbai, Pune &
Bangalore
~78% Capital returned till date from end of
commitment period
1.7x Portfolio valuation as per Grant
Thornton valuation report2
1 – Including co-investment
2 – IREF’s portfolio valuation as on 31 March 2014, as per an independent valuation report issued by Grant Thornton
Project Partners
Godrej Properties, Supreme Universal & Mirchandani Developers, etc.
19
Out of 7 investment, the fund has fully exited 4 investments at an investment level IRR of ~ 20%. Part exits have been achieved in 2 investments & ~ 80% capital has been returned to the investors
About Motilal Oswal Private Equity (MOPE)
Motilal Oswal Real Estate Investment Advisors Pvt.
Ltd. (MORE) is a wholly owned subsidiary of MOPE
Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
MOPE manages a total AUM of over INR 2,400 cr
Rs 900 cr across Real Estate and PMS/Prop
Funds
Rs 1500 cr across Private Equity
Motilal Oswal Private Equity won Best Growth Capital
Investor 2012 award at the Venture Intelligence’s
Awards for Private Equity Excellence 2013 in February
2013 ~INR 950 cr sector agnostic fund; 6 Investments focusing
on mid-market
India Business Excellence Fund II
~INR 200 cr domestic real estate fund (including co-
investments); 7 Investments
India Realty Excellence Fund
~INR 550 cr sector agnostic fund; 13 Investments
focusing on mid-market
India Business Excellence Fund
Funds Under Management
~INR 500 cr domestic real estate fund; 6 investments
concluded
India Realty Excellence Fund II LLP
20
Key Emerging Trends
Residential segment to witness challenging times over next 12 – 18 months – Time correction underway
Commercial sector witnessing revival; lack of new supply might lead to uptick in rentals
Amongst major cities, Bangalore is leading the pack in terms of absorption; demand primarily driven by booming e-commerce companies and affordable prices
Luxury segment witnessing maximum pain; High price in cities like Mumbai has made most of the properties out of reach for majority
In terms of FDI, there is a huge demand for completed office assets; Blackstone has become the largest owner of office assets in the country, with nearly 32 million sq. ft of office space across cities including Mumbai, Bengaluru, NCR and Pune
Government focus towards housing has increased over the past 1 – 1.5 years
o Housing for All by 2022
o Development of 100 smart cities
o Real Estate Bill
o FDI norm relaxation
Economic revival expected to improve buyer affordability, residential sales shall resume its upward trend; Recent rate cut should augur well for the sector
23
Disclaimer:- This report is for information purposes only and does not construe to be any investment, legal or taxation advice. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. Any action taken by you on the basis of the information contained herein is your responsibility alone and India Realty Excellence Fund II LLP, Motilal Oswal Real Estate Investment Advisors II Private Limited and its subsidiaries or its employees or directors, associates will not be liable in any manner for the consequences of such action taken by you. We have exercised due diligence in checking the correctness and authenticity of the information contained herein, but do not represent that it is accurate or complete. India Realty Excellence Fund II LLP, Motilal Oswal Real Estate Investment Advisors II Private Limited or any of its subsidiaries or associates or employees shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this publication.