Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
MOSFET Modeling for Low Temperature Analog Circuit Design
Patrick MARTIN
CEA-LETI
Grenoble, France
E-mail: [email protected]
2EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Acknowledgements
• Christian Enz• Pioneering work of F. Théodoloz (EPFL)• Matthias Bucher• Analog designers from LETI : J.L. Martin, F. Rothan , …• Ch. Chancel for experimental support• French Ministry of Defense and CEA
3EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Outline of presentation
• Why CMOS at low temperature ?• Some studied CMOS processes at LT• Compact MOSFET model for analog circuit design• Examples of simulation• Low frequency noise• Transistor matching• Summary and conclusion
Keywords: analog MOSFET, weak & moderate inversion, low temperature, low frequency noise, transistor matching
4EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Why CMOS at LT ? Higher saturation drain current ?
Idsat 77 K / Idsat 293 K vs. drawn length
⇒ Velocity saturation is the main effect limitingshort-channel devices performance at LT
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0.1 1 10 100
Ldrawn (µm)
Idsat (77 K
) / Idsat (293 K
)NMOS0.35 µm CMOS
PMOS
0.21 µm CMOS
Vds=Vgs=3.3 or 2.5 V
X 1.2 ∼∼∼∼ 1.3
X 3
X 1.9
5EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Saturation drain current
(((( ))))
(((( ))))VtVgvWCI:EE
VtVgL
WCµ
2
1I:EE
satOXsat,dcrit
2
OXsat,dcrit
−−−−====>>>>
−−−−====<<<<
Ecrit ≈≈≈≈ 5 x 103 V/cm at 300 Kvsat ≈≈≈≈ 107 cm/s at 300 Kvsat 77 K / v sat 300 K ≈≈≈≈ 1.2-1.3
6EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
So why CMOS at LT ?
• Design of infrared image sensors [ high performance ,high complexity (1 Mpixel), 77 K – 200 K ]• Simulation of hybrid CMOS analog read-out circuits• No SPICE parameters at LT from CMOS foundries• Validity of BSIM3v3 (Berkeley), EKV 2.6 (EPFL), MM9(Philips) at T <<<< 200 K ?• Importance of weak - moderate inversion regimes• Need to develop a specific analog model and extractDC, AC, 1/f noise and matching parameters
7EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Herschel /PACS 0.3 K
IRCMOS 77 K
IRCMOS circuits designed at CEA-LETI
1024 x 1024 pitch 15 µm
Hybridisation by indium bumps
8EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
CEA-LETI 1024 x 1024 MW-IRFPA p=15 µm T=77 K
9EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Studied CMOS processes (1/2)
� 0.7 µm - 5 V standard CMOS process:• Single gate process (N + poly-Si ):
NMOS: surface channel (TCV_N ≈≈≈≈ 1 mV/K)PMOS: buried channel (TCV_P ≈≈≈≈ 2 mV/K)
• AeroSense, SPIE Symposium (Orlando 2001)
� 0.5 µm - 3.3 V standard CMOS process:• Single gate process (N + poly-Si )
10EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Studied CMOS processes (2/2)
� 0.35 µm - 3.3 V standard CMOS process:• Single gate process (N + poly-Si ):
NMOS: surface channel (TCV_N ≈≈≈≈ 1 mV/K)PMOS: buried channel (TCV_P ≈≈≈≈ 2 mV/K)
• WOLTE-5 (Grenoble 2002)
� 0.21 µm - 1.8 V std. process:• Dual gate process: NMOS & PMOS surf. channels only(TCV_N ≈≈≈≈ TCV_P ≈≈≈≈ 1 mV/K) + Pocket implants• MIXDES (Lodz 2003) & WOLTE-6 (Noordwijk 2004)
11EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
The standard version of the EKV model at LT: main problem
NMOS 77 K Tox=150 nm W/L=20/20 µm Vds=50 mV [1]
EKV 2.3 (THETA)
12EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
(From M. Bucher, CMC meeting, June 2004)
The standard version of the EKV model at LT: main problem
µeff vs. Eeff
1/ Coulomb scatt.
2/ Phonon scatt.
3/ SR scatt.
Qi = f(x), x = 0 →→→→ L
Matthiessen
13EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
The LT version of the EKV 2.6 model: main improvement
• New charge-based mobility model:
• 5 parameters: µ 0, αααα1, ECO, EPH, ESR• Local mobility →→→→ global mobility through integrationalong the channel
(((( ))))Si
bieff
2
eff31
eff1-
eff
0 QQqEwith
ESRE
EPHE
ECOE
++++====
++++
++++
====
14EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Freeze-out effects at LT
-130 °C ∼∼∼∼ 140 K
15EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Freeze-out effects at LT
1. Freeze-out effects in substrate (T ≤≤≤≤ 10 K)
2. Freeze-out effects in buried channel PMOS
3. Freeze-out effects in LDD zones
16EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
1. Freeze-out effects at very LT
T = 4.2 K (L4He) : kink effect + hysteresis
Ids(Vds)
Gds(Vds)
17EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
2. Freeze-out effects in buried channel PMOS
Subthreshold swing in 0.5 µm CMOSwith single N+ poly-Si gate
0
25
50
75
100
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
T (K)
S (mV/dec)
PMOS
NMOS
2.3 kT/q
18EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
2. Freeze-out effects in buried channel PMOS
• Degradation of the weak inversion slope (T < 200 K)
• New parameter: NUO (1st-order estimation)
1E-12
1E-11
1E-10
1E-09
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2
- Vgs [V]
- Id [A]
W/L=20/20 Vds=- 50 mV
Vbs=0 Vbs=3 V
NUO=2.6
NUO=1
Meas.
0.35 µm CMOS with single N+ poly-Si gate
T = 77 K
19EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
2. Freeze-out effects in buried channel PMOS
• Less important degradation of the weak inversion sl ope
• Parameter NUO still needed: NUO=1.9 PMOS, NUO=1.5 N MOS
0.21 µm CMOS with dual poly-Si gate: no buried channel
1E-10
1E-09
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
- Vgs (V)
- Id (A)
W/L=20/20 Vds=-50 mV Vbs=0 V
NU0 = 1
optim. NU0 > 1
exp. T = 77 K
20EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
3. Freeze-out effects in LDD zones: NMOS 77 K
0.35 µm CMOS process 0.21 µm CMOS process
No freeze-out effects in 0.21 µm tech.Influence of pockets ?
Strong influence on Gds at T ≤≤≤≤ 150 K in prev. processes
0.0E+00
5.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.5E-02
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Vds (V)
Gds (S)
Vgs = 3 V
1 V
2 V
W/L=20/0.35
0.0E+00
2.0E-02
4.0E-02
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Vds (V)
Gds (S)
Vgs=2.5 V
1 V
W/L=20/0.21
Not modelised
21EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Some examples of simulation
• ELDO circuit simulator (Mentor Graphics)
+ UDM/CMPI (User Defined Model)
• UTMOST (Silvaco) for parameter extraction & optimiza tion
� On 0.21 µm CMOS process
� After parameter optimisation: Lmin<L<20µm ; Wmin<W<2 0 µm ;weak/moderate/strong inversion
22EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Drain current Id Gate transconductance Gm
Linear (ohmic) regime Vds = 50 mV
Ex: NMOS transfer characteristics at 77 K (1/2)
Negative transconductance Gm
1E-12
1E-11
1E-10
1E-09
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
1E-04
1E-03
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Vgs (V)
Id (A)
0E+00
2E-05
4E-05
6E-05
8E-05W/L=20/20 Vds=50 mV Vbs=0 to -2 V step -0.5 V
NMOS 77 K
-2E-05
0E+00
2E-05
4E-05
6E-05
8E-05
1E-04
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Vgs (V)Gm (S)
W/L=20/20 Vds=50 mV Vbs=0 to -2 V step 0.5V
meas.
sim.
23EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Drain current Id Gate transconductance Gm
Saturation Vds = 2.5 V
Ex: NMOS transfer characteristics at 77 K (2/2)
1E-12
1E-11
1E-10
1E-09
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
1E-04
1E-03
1E-02
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Vgs (V)
Id (A)
0.0E+00
4.0E-04
8.0E-04
1.2E-03
1.6E-03W/L=20/20 Vds=2.5 V Vbs=0 to -2 V step -0.5 V
NMOS 77 K
0.0E+00
2.5E-04
5.0E-04
7.5E-04
1.0E-03
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Vgs (V)Gm (S)
meas.
sim.
24EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Linear regime Vds = - 50 mV Saturation Vds = - 2.5 V
Ex: PMOS transfer characteristics at 77 K
1E-12
1E-11
1E-10
1E-09
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
1E-04
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
- Vgs (V)
- Id (A)
0.0E+00
4.0E-06
8.0E-06
1.2E-05W/L=20/20 Vds=-50 mV Vbs=0 to 2 V step 0.5 V
0.0E+00
5.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.5E-04
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Vgs (V)
Gm (S)
1E-12
1E-11
1E-10
1E-09
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
1E-04
1E-03
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
- Vgs (V)
- Id (A)
0.0E+00
5.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.5E-04
2.0E-04
2.5E-04W/L=20/20 Vds=-2.5 V Vbs=0 to 2 V step 0.5 V
0E+00
5E-06
1E-05
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
-Vgs (V)
Gm (S)
meas.
sim
.
25EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Ex: Short-channel PMOS at 77 K
W/L=20/0.32
Id(Vd)Id(Vg) Lin & Log
0E+00
2E-03
4E-03
6E-03
8E-03
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
- Vds (V)- Id (A)
-Vgs=1 to 2.5 V step 0.5 V
1E-12
1E-10
1E-08
1E-06
1E-04
1E-02
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
- Vgs (V)
- Id (A)
0E+00
2E-03
4E-03
6E-03
8E-03Vds=-2.5 V Vbs=0 to 2 V step 1 V
26EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
NMOS output characteristics
77 K
Drain current Id
Drain conductance Gds
Ex: Long-channel NMOS 0.35 µm CMOS
0.0E+00
5.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.5E-06
2.0E-06
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Vds [V]
Id [A]
W/L=1µm/20 µm Vbs=0 V Vgs=1.1 V
Vgs=0.7 V
1E-13
1E-12
1E-11
1E-10
1E-09
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Vds [V]
Gds [S]
Vgs=0.6 V
Vgs=1.1 V
exp
sim
27EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
NMOS drain conductance 77 K long-channel (L = 20 µm )
Pocket implants & long channel MOSFETs
• Important degradation of Gds in saturation ( ≈≈≈≈ 1 decade)
• Effect not specific to LT; same problem at RT
1E-08
1E-07
1E-06
1E-05
1E-04
1E-03
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Vds (V)
Gds (S)
Id = 1 µA
Id = 65 µA
0.21 µm CMOS process (with pockets)
0.35 µm CMOS process (w/o pockets)
28EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
AC parameters vs. temperature
CJ (T) CJSW (T)
MJ & MJSW
5.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.5E-03
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T (K)
CJ (F/m
2)
P+/N
N+/P
0E+00
1E-10
2E-10
3E-10
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T(K)
CJSW
(F/m
)
P+/N
N+/P
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T (K)
MJ, MJSW
P+/N
N+/P
P+/N
N+/P
MJ
MJSW
29EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Low frequency noise at LT
(((( ))))AF
ox
2
m2
IdfCLW
GKFHz/AS ====
1/f noise model in std. EKV 2.6 :
30EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
LF noise and evolution with temperature
After optimization in weak & moderate inversion
NMOS
1E-26
1E-25
1E-24
50 100 150 200 250 300
Temperature (K)
KF (V
2 F)
dKF/dT=-4.6E-3 V2F/K
dKF/dT=-4.0E-3 V2F/K
0.21 µm process
0.35 µm process
1E-26
1E-25
1E-24
50 100 150 200 250 300
Temperature (K)
KF (V
2 F)
dKF/dT=3.9E-3 V2F/K
dKF/dT=5.1E-3 V2F/K
0.21 µm process
0.35 µm process
PMOS
31EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
NMOS T = 77 Kf = 1 Hz
|Vds| = 1.8 or 3.3 VWmin < W < 20 µmLmin < L < 20 µm
LFN model: test from weak to strong inversion
• Better agreement:
• For 0.5, 0.35 & 0.21 µm CMOS, single & dual gateprocesses, RT & LT: 1.8 < EF < 2.3 (tech. dependent )
AF
ox
EF
m
IdfCLW
GKFS ====
Normalized noise spectral density
1E-41
1E-39
1E-37
1E-35
1E-33
1E-31
1E-29
1E-27
1E-09 1E-08 1E-07 1E-06 1E-05 1E-04 1E-03 1E-02
Gm (S)
W L Cox SId (A
2 F/H
z)
0.21 µm process
0.35 µm process
32EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
PMOS T = 77 Kf = 1 Hz
|Vds| = 1.8 or 3.3 VWmin < W < 20 µmLmin < L < 20 µm
LFN model: test from weak to strong inversion
Normalized noise spectral density
1E-41
1E-39
1E-37
1E-35
1E-33
1E-31
1E-29
1E-27
1E-09 1E-08 1E-07 1E-06 1E-05 1E-04 1E-03 1E-02
Gm (S)
W L Cox SId (A
2 F/H
z)
0.21 µm process
0.35 µm process
33EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Pelgrom model (1989)
LW
AP)(
2
P2 ====∆∆∆∆σσσσ
22
P
2
P2DS
LW
AP)( ++++====∆∆∆∆σσσσ
D
M1 M2
M2
(P = VTO, ββββ, γγγγ)
MOSFET matching at low temperature
34EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Transistor matching: parameter extraction
• NMOS & PMOS modules (21 transistors ; 6 different s izes : WxL = 12.6x12.6, … 0.5x0.35 µm 2 ; D = 14 µm)
• P = VTO (threshold voltage), KP (current factor), G AMMA (substrate coefficient)
• Extracted parameters: AVTO, AKP, AGAMMA• Measurements in linear regime at RT, 200 K & 77 K• Matching data at LT: very scarce in literature
35EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Transistor matching: results on a 0.35 µm CMOS process with single N + poly-Si gate
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
50 100 150 200 250 300
Temperature [K]
AVTO [mV µm]
NMOS
PMOS
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
50 100 150 200 250 300
Temperature [K]
AKP [%
µm]
NMOS
PMOS
0E+00
1E-03
2E-03
3E-03
4E-03
5E-03
6E-03
7E-03
50 100 150 200 250 300
Temperature [K]
AGAMMA [V
1/2µm]
NMOS
PMOS
Tox = 7.5 nm
Threshold voltage
Current factor
Substrate coeff.
36EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Transistor matching: results
• In general, poorer matching at LT• Notable exception : threshold voltage of PMOS with buried
channel ; AVTO extremely small at 77 K (same behavi or on PMOS 0.7 µm N+ gate process)
37EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
(((( )))) (((( )))) (((( ))))(((( ))))2thGS
2
2
2
d
d
VV
VTO4
I
I
−−−−∆∆∆∆σσσσ++++
ββββββββ∆∆∆∆σσσσ====∆∆∆∆σσσσ
(((( )))) (((( ))))VTOVn
1
I
I
td
d ∆∆∆∆σσσσ====∆∆∆∆σσσσWeak inversion :
Strong inversion :
σσσσ(∆∆∆∆Id) / Id (%) vs. Id
MOSFET matching parameters: verification in saturation
NMOS 77 K Vds=3.3 V Vbs=0 V
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1E-10 1E-09 1E-08 1E-07 1E-06 1E-05 1E-04 1E-03 1E-02
Id (A)
SDId / Id (%
)
12.6/12.6
0.49/0.35
1.75/1.75
Monte Carlo
38EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
MOSFET matching parameters: implementation in ELDO ?
EKV 2.6 Model Equations:
39EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
Summary and conclusion
• Specific model based on std. EKV 2.6• 2 main improvements: mobility, weak inv. slope degr ad.• Only 6 additional parameters• 0.7 - 0.5 - 0.35 and 0.21 µm CMOS std. bulk processes• EKV-LT model implemented in ELDO and UTMOST• Still compact and continuous charge-based model• Additional results on LF noise and transistor match ingevolution with temperature• Excellent tool for analog IC design at LT
40EKV 2.6 Users’ Meeting, EPFL, Lausanne, Nov. 4, 2004
References
[1] F. Théodoloz, C. Enz, M. Bucher, Charge Based MOS Transistor Mobility Modelling Applicable at Low Temperature, unpublishe d EPFL Technical Report
[2] P. Martin, M. Bucher and C. Enz, MOSFET Modelin g and Parameter Extraction for Low Temperature Analog Circuit Desig n, 5th European Workshop on Low Temperature Electronic (WOLTE-5), G renoble, June 2002
[3] P. Martin and M. Bucher, MOSFET Modeling for Lo w Temperature (77 K –200 K) Analog Circuit Design, MIXDES-03, Lodz, Pola nd, June 2003
[4] P. Martin and M. Bucher, Comparison of 0.35 and 0.21 µm CMOS Technologies for Low Temperature Operation (77 K – 2 00 K) and Analog Circuit Design, 6 th European Workshop on Low Temperature Electronic (WOLTE-6), ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, June 2004