12
XMM-Newton 1 M.Stuhlinger, ESAC MOS1 Timing Mode noise echo of the meteorite column Madrid, 23. March 2009

MOS1 Timing Mode noise echo of the meteorite column Madrid, 23. March 2009

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

MOS1 Timing Mode noise echo of the meteorite column Madrid, 23. March 2009. Discovery history:. During analyses of MOS1 timing mode exposures. My MOS1 timing mode spectrum of highly absorbed source 1E1740.7-2942 looks very different to MOS2/pn at low energies. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

XMM-Newton

1

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

MOS1 Timing Mode

noise echo

of the meteorite column

Madrid, 23. March 2009

XMM-Newton

2

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

Discovery history:

• During analyses of MOS1 timing mode exposures.

• My MOS1 timing mode spectrum of highly absorbed source 1E1740.7-2942 looks very different to MOS2/pn at low energies.

• Same spectrum extracted by Carlos Gabriel agrees with MOS2 and does not show low energy features.

XMM-Newton

3

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

Different spectra extractions cause different appearance

XMM-Newton

4

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

Discovery history:

• During analyses of MOS1 timing mode exposures.

• My MOS1 timing mode spectrum of highly absorbed source 1E1740.7-2942 looks very different to MOS2/pn at low energies.

• Same spectrum extracted by Carlos Gabriel agrees with MOS2 and does not show low energy features.

• Where do “my” low energy counts come from?Columns 320-327 show noise component shifted to lower energies with increasing RAWX.

XMM-Newton

5

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

1E1740.7-2942

XMM-Newton

6

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

1E1740.7-2942

RA

WX

320

RA

WX

321

RA

WX

323

RA

WX

324

RA

WX

325

RA

WX

322

XMM-Newton

7

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

Discovery:

• During analyses of MOS1 timing mode exposures.

• My MOS1 timing mode spectrum of highly absorbed source 1E1740.7-2942 looks very different to MOS2/pn at low energies.

• Same spectrum extracted by Carlos Gabriel agrees with MOS2 and does not show low energy features.

• Where do “my” low energy the counts come from?Columns 322-325 show noise component shifted to lower energies with increasing RAWX.

• Why the difference? We both exclude the hot column RAWX=319.Carlos used RAWX [300:316] (left PSF wing only), I used RAWX [300:317] or [321:330] (both PSF

wings with gap).

XMM-Newton

8

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

1E1740.7-2942

6 p

ixel

s to

be

ign

ore

d

XMM-Newton

9

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

MOS1 1E1740.7-2942 (rev.1065): PI versus RAWX

RAWX 323

RAWX 322

RAWX 324

RAWX 325

RAWX 321RA

WX

319

RAWX 320

RAWX

PI

XMM-Newton

10

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

MOS1 Swift J1753.5-0127 (rev.1152): PI versus RAWX

RAWX 323

RAWX 322

RAWX 324

RAWX 325

RAWX 321

RA

WX

319

RAWX 320

RAWX

PI

XMM-Newton

11

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

MOS1 4U0142+61 (rev.1300): PI versus RAWX

RAWX 323

RAWX 322

RAWX 324

RAWX 325

RAWX 321

RA

WX

319

RAWX 320

RAWX

PI

XMM-Newton

12

M.Stuhlinger, ESAC

Conclusions:

• Noise echo of meteorite column in RAWX [320:325] is common feature in MOS1 timing modes.

• Most probable noise echo is created within serial readout process.

• For extraction of MOS1 timing mode spectra (Rev.>961):

Better ignore RAWX [318:325]

• Large fraction of the right (higher RAWX values) PSF wing is lost!

• Already recommended: Avoid MOS1 observations in timing mode.