Upload
satpal-singh
View
219
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Morphology and Rheological Behavior of PolylacticAcid/Clay Nanocomposites
Satpal Singh,1 Anup K. Ghosh,1 Saurindra N. Maiti,1 Sumanta Raha,2 Rahul K. Gupta,2
Satinath Bhattacharya21 Centre for Polymer Science & Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Rheology and Materials Processing Centre,RMIT University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
The investigated rheological properties of polylacticacid (PLA)/clay nanocomposite are important to under-stand the effect of organically modified layered sili-cates (OMLS) (clay) on processing as well as thechange in viscoelastic properties due to polymer fillerinteraction. The time sweep result revealed that thethermal stability improved with addition of nanoclaydue to the formation of percolating network structure.It was also supported by multi wave ramp test. The fre-quency sweep analysis showed that the dynamic mod-uli increased with addition of nanoclay. Viscoelasticspectra (DMTA) showed an increase of the storage andloss moduli with the increase in the clay content. Wideangle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) and transmission elec-tron microscopy (TEM) were used to determinethe degree of intercalation, or exfoliation and nano-structure level of clay dispersion on PLA nanocompo-sites. XRD data demonstrated complete exfoliation atlower nanoclay content. On increasing the nanoclaycontent, exfoliated and partially intercalated structureswere obtained. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 52:225–232, 2012. ª 2011Society of Plastics Engineers
INTRODUCTION
The need to develop new polymeric system based on
renewable resources results from the environmental and
economic concerns of today. These renewable resources
based system have been playing an important role as mate-
rials for humanity through their exploitation in a progres-
sively more elaborated fashion. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is
at present one of the most promising renewable resources
based polymer. PLA has various other advantages also
including (i) its excellent mechanical properties and ther-
moplastic processibility for different molding application,
(ii) its production consumes quantities of carbon dioxides,
(iii) it provides significant energy savings, (iv) it is recycla-
ble and compostable, and (v) when burned it produces no
nitrogen oxide gases and only one-third of the combustible
heat generated by polyolefins [1–4]. Unfortunately, some
properties, such as limited thermal stability during the melt
processing, heat deflection temperature, gas barrier prop-
erty, and melt viscosity of PLA, are not good enough for a
wide range of application [5]. To improve these properties,
the preparation of nanocomposites with clay such as organ-
ically modified layered silicates (OMLS) has been adopted
[6]. The method has already proven to be effective for
PLA/layered silicates preparation [7–9] and developing
structures [8–11], as well as rheology [6, 12–15] and ther-
mal properties [10, 11, 16–18].
PLA is commercially and largely available in a wide
range of grades. So for effective processing, fundamental
understanding of its rheological properties must be
obtained. On the other hand, the rheology offers a mean
to assess the state of dispersion of OMLS into PLA
matrix, the degree of polymer filler interaction, the struc-
ture–properties relationship, and effective change of its
viscoelastic properties. Dispersion of OMLS in the PLA
matrix leads to intercalation and exfoliation of organo-
clay. Stress relaxation tests which apply an instantaneous
deformation (strain) to the sample and record the time
dependent decay of stress offer effective measure to
understand the same. The rate of decay of the stress
depends on the viscoelasticity of the polymer at the test
temperature. This is useful to interpret the viscoelastic
behavior observed at low frequencies region in the
dynamic measurements for the PLA nanocomposites.
Rheology of nanocomposites is of interest for several
reasons. The morphology in a polymer clay nanocompo-
site is typically intercalated or exfoliated. An exfoliated
structure is desirable as it tends to produce excellent ther-
mal and mechanical properties at very low filler levels.
The viscosity is sensitive to the structure and so can be
used to evaluate the morphology. The proper characteriza-
tion of a polymer’s viscosity is also critical to making the
Correspondence to: A.K. Ghosh; e-mail: [email protected]
DOI 10.1002/pen.22074
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
VVC 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers
POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2012
correct choice of grade, so that a high quality product can
be manufactured successfully.
A wide range of tests are generally carried out to char-
acterize the rheological properties of polymers. One suited
to nanocomposites is dynamic oscillatory shear. This
measures elastic and viscous properties simultaneously.
Oscillatory tests are run at small amplitudes at various
frequencies in the linear elastic range of the material so
that any networks are not disrupted. This is important for
materials such as nanocomposites, which contain stiff ani-
sometric clay particles in the matrix. The low frequency
range is of particular interest as it is most sensitive to
melt elasticity and to the network formation. Storage
modulus (G0) and loss modulus (G00) are reported, which
represent the relative degrees of the material to recover
(elastic response) or flow (viscous response) respectively,
as the rate of deformation (frequency) changes. Changes
in the ratios of the moduli (tan d) can be used to evaluate
the extent of delamination of the organoclay tactoids (tac-
toid size effects the physical and mechanical properties of
nanocomposites). The onset of solid-like behavior can be
used to determine the geometrical percolation of the
nanoparticles as well as to predict the optimum concentra-
tion for mechanical and physical properties.
The importance of extensional rheological measure-
ment is to understand extensional flows of molten poly-
mer. Solidification of polymer melts in industrial opera-
tions, such as film blowing involving stretching both in
machine and transverse directions have significant effects
on the properties of the final products. Liviu et al.
reported the high L-content PLA exhibit considerable
strain hardening during the extensional rheology. The
strain induced hardening was also observed in PLA nano-
composite system [14, 19]. The strain hardening generally
results due to the presence of a high molecular weight tail
or due to the perpendicular alignment of the OMLS layers
towards the stretching direction. Thus, the extensional
rheological data become very critical for processing oper-
ations like film blowing, film casting, and fiber spinning.
In this article, PLA nanocomposites were prepared by
using the melt blending technique. The detailed melt
rheological studies of a series of PLA nanocomposites are
discussed in terms of dynamic sweep (strain, frequency,
and time), steady shear viscosity, stress relaxation, and
extensional viscosity. The observation from rheology has
been corrected with the interpretation of XRD and TEM.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
Poly(L-lactic acid), PLA (Nature works1 4032D), was
procured from Cargill/Dow LLC (Minnetonka, MN).
It contains more than 98% of L-lactide and less than 2%
D-lactide. Organically treated montmorillonite layered sili-
cate, Cloisite1 30B containing methyl-bis (2-hydroxy-
ethyl) tallow alkyl ammonium cations was obtained from
Southern Clay Ltd (TX). The interlayer distance (d-spac-ing) of the nanoclay was 1.84 nm.
Compounding and Film Blowing of PLA/Nanoclay
PLA and Cloisite1 30B were dried at 808C for 4 h under
reduced pressure. PLA and Cloisite1 30B were com-
pounded on a Prism EUROLAB-16 co-rotating, completely
intermeshing, twin screw extruder (16 mm diameter and an
L/D ratio of 40:1), with an attached strand die. Melt process-
ing of polylactic acid and nanoclay containing 1 phr
(PNC1), 3 phr (PNC3), and 5 phr (PNC5) of nanoclay was
carried out at the screw rotation speed of 100 rpm. The barrel
temperature of the extruder ranged from 180 to 2008C from
the feed to the die zone. Unfilled PLA (reference material)
was also melt-processed under identical shear and thermal
condition. The PLA and PLA nanocomposites were dried
for 4 h at 808C and then film blown using a single-screw ex-
truder (Thermo-Haake Rheomex 252) equipped with a spiral
flow blown film die with a 25 mm diameter and blown film
take-off (‘‘Postex’’) unit. The temperature of the heating and
die zone was 2008C and the screw speed was 60 rpm. The
take-off speed of 700 cm/min was used.
Characterization
Wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) was used to
determine the degree of intercalation, or exfoliation and
nanostructure level of nanocomposites. Blown film sam-
ples were investigated in the transmission mode (coupled
y/2y) to check the effect of the nanoparticle orientation.
A wide angle goniometer was coupled to a sealed-tube
source of filtered Cu Ka radiation operating at 40 kV and
30 mA (PW 3040/60 X’ Pert PRO).
The dispersion of the silicate layers was also investi-
gated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). For
TEM samples of PLA nanocomposite pellets, prepared by
freshly cut glass knives with cutting edge of 458, were usedto get the cryosections of 50 nm thickness by using a Leica
ultra cut UCT microtome. JEOL-2100 electron microscope
(Tokyo, Japan) with LaB6 filament and operating at an
accelerating voltage of 200 kV was used to obtain the
bright field images of the cryomicrotomed samples.
Melt rheological measurements were studied with an
advanced research grade rheometer (ARES; Rheometric
scientific). The measurements were performed with a
parallel plate geometry using 25 mm diameter plates and
the sample thickness was �1.75 mm. The compression
molded samples were investigated at temperature 1808C.The following tests were performed: (i) dynamic strain
sweep to assess the limits of linear viscoelastic property
at 1 rad/sec; (ii) dynamic frequency time sweep to
assess the improvement in the stability of sample during
testing, with addition of clay content; (iii) dynamic fre-
quency sweep over an angular frequency range starting
from high 100 rad/sec down to 0.1 rad/sec; and (iv)
226 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2012 DOI 10.1002/pen
multi wave temperature ramp test: In this test at a time
three different frequency (high, medium and low) data
can be obtained, with increasing temperature and time.
During this test set, the temperature change was negligi-
ble (only 0.58C) in 1 h time.
Steady shear viscosity measurements were conducted
by using Parallel plate (Low steady shear viscosity) and
Malvern Capillary Rheometer-RH7 (High steady shear vis-
cosity). Uniaxial elongational measurements were con-
ducted at a constant Hencky strain rate by using ARES-
EVF (Extensional Viscosity Fixture) rheometer. Tests were
performed at temperatures of 1808C at an extension rate of
e ¼ 0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 sec21 using rectangular shaped sam-
ples. At every extension rate three tests were carried out to
ensure the reproducibility of the experiments.
Dynamic mechanical properties were measured with a
TA instrument, DMA Q 800, in a single cantilever bend-
ing mode. The dynamic storage and loss moduli were
determined at a constant frequency (x) of 1 Hz or as a
function of temperature from 2908C to 1508C at a heat-
ing rate of 2 8C/min.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
XRD Characterization
WAXD pattern (see Fig. 1) illustrates the differences in
layer spacing of the nanocomposites. The diffractogram of
unfilled PLA film and Closite 30B powder were also
shown as a comparison. The diffractogram for Closite 30B
showed the primary silicate reflection at 2y ¼ 4.838 whichcorresponds to a layer spacing of 1.83 nm. This maximum
was not observed for the PLA nanocomposites. The
unfilled PLA film did not show any reflection peak (below
2y ¼ 108). The diffraction patterns of the nanocomposites
PNC1, PNC3, and PNC5 showed shifting of the character-
istic peak towards lower 2y value of 2.58. This feature is
characteristic of a good dispersion of the organoclay,
achieved by an intercalation followed by tactoids forma-
tion and then exfoliation of the nano platelets in the PLA
matrix [20]. This indicates that polymer chains diffused
into the silicate galleries expanding the clay interlayer
spacing. As reported in literature, Cloisite 30B organoclay
has favorable enthalpic interaction between diols present in
the organic modifier with the C¼¼O bonds present in the
PLA backbone, which is expected to play a significant role
in observing exfoliated morphology [21].
The nanocomposite film containing 1 phr clay did not
show any primary silicate reflection peak but the intensity
of background scattering in between 2y ¼ 2–78 was
increased compared to that in case of unfilled PLA film.
It indicates that at lower nanoclay content, the clay layers
can disperse better and as a result more PLA chains can
enter into the clay galleries. This is typically the case for
nanocomposites having lower clay content which is re-
sponsible for the exfoliation mechanism.
The diffractograms of PNC3 and PNC5 showed only
very small bulge around 2y ¼ 2.58 (d001 ¼ 3.5 nm). The
PNC5 diffractogram showed that the peak sharpness was
higher than that of the PNC3. The intensity of the charac-
teristic peak of the clay increases as the clay content
becomes higher. This was because the number density of
the intercalated clay particles in the polymer matrix
increases, as the clay content rises, and many more X-
rays diffracted [22]. Increase of the clay loading impedes
exfoliation of clay layers due to the restricted area
remaining available in the polymer matrix and hence, the
degree of intercalation enhances [7].
TEM Characterization
The TEM images (Fig. 2a–c) corresponding to the
samples corroborates the XRD measurements. In all these,
the exfoliated structure was found to be present in PNC1,
whereas for both PNC3 and PNC5 exfoliated and partially
intercalated structure were mostly observed.
Shear Rheology
Dynamic strain sweep was used to determine the linear
viscoelastic region (LVR) of pure PLA and its nanocom-
posites. The LVR was found to decrease with the addition
of nanoclay. The pure PLA showed a linear region up to
50% strain applied at 1808C, whereas it decreased to
about 10% strain for PNC5 with 5 phr clay loading (see
Fig. 3). Hence the strain amplitude was taken as 5% for
all subsequent linear viscoelastic tests [20].
The thermal stability of the melt samples during the
dynamic measurements, dynamic frequency time sweep
tests were employed to look for any changes with time in
their storage modulus (G0) over time at a constant fre-
quency (1 rad/sec). As it can be seen in Fig. 4, all melt
samples had nearly constant G0 up to 100 sec and thus
thermal stability for up to that time [20].
Figure 5a and b show the storage modulus (G0) and
loss modulus (G00) as a function of frequency for PLA
nanocomposite samples. The G0 and G00 of PNCs were
higher than those of pure PLA at all frequencies and their
FIG. 1. WAXD patterns of PLA nanocomposites.
DOI 10.1002/pen POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2012 227
values increased with increasing clay content especially at
low frequencies (\10 rad/sec). In the case of homopoly-
mer samples, it is expected that they would exhibit the
characteristic low-frequency terminal behavior expressed
by the power laws G0 ! x2 and G00 ! x, as was seen
for pure PLA (see Fig. 5). The PLA nanocomposite sam-
ples, however, showed a gradual deviation from the termi-
nal liquid-like behavior to a solid-like behavior with
increasing clay concentration, as evidenced by the
decrease in the slope of low frequency G0 and G00 with
respect to frequency, plotted on log–log scale. For PNC
5, the solid-like behavior was most pronounced. PNC5
FIG. 2. TEM images of various PLA nanocomposites (a) PNC1, (b)
PNC3, and (c) PNC5.
FIG. 3. Dynamic strain sweep of PLA nanocomposites.
FIG. 4. Dynamic time sweep of PLA nanocomposites.
FIG. 5. (a) G0 and (b) G00 of PLA nanocomposites.
228 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2012 DOI 10.1002/pen
also showed largest increase in both G0 and G00 at low
frequencies. At low frequency (�0.1 rad/sec), G0
exceeded G00 showing a plateau which is generally
‘‘Pseudo-solid-like behavior’’ of the materials at low
deformation frequencies [23, 24].
Figure 6 shows the frequency dependency of the com-
plex viscosity (g*) for PLA nanocomposite sample of
PLA. The g* of the PNC0 showed a Newtonian plateau
at low and mid frequency ranges followed by shear-thin-
ning behavior at the highest frequencies. The Newtonian
plateau viscosity was also observed for the nanocomposite
with the lowest loading, PNC1. However, at higher clay
loadings such as for PNC3 and PNC5, no Newtonian pla-
teau could be observed within the frequency range and
the viscosity continued to increase with decreasing fre-
quency indicating a pseudo-yield-stress behavior at low
frequencies. Such pseudo-yield-stress behavior was most
prominent for the nanocomposite with the highest clay
loading, PNC5.
The stress relaxation data of PLA nanocomposites are
shown in Fig. 7. The slopes of G(t) curves decreased with
increase of clay content, which indicated that the relaxa-
tion time increased with the increase in clay content [6].
The stress relaxation data of PNC5 showed a solid-like
behavior. This behavior is due to the presence of interca-
lated silicate layers that are randomly oriented in PLA
matrix, forming a three dimension network structure.
Another explanation could be due to the physical jam-
ming of the dispersed intercalated silicate layers owing to
their highly anisotropic nature. On the basis of this meso-
scopic structure and at low silicate loadings beyond a crit-
ical volume fraction, the tactoids and the individual layers
were incapable of freely rotating and when subjected to
shear they were prevented from relaxing completely. This
incomplete relaxation due to the physical jamming or per-
colation of the Closite 30B lead to the pseudo-solid-like
behavior observed in both the intercalated and exfoliated
hybrids [25].
The multi wave ramp data, presented in Fig. 8, show
the time dependencies of the storage modulus at three dif-
ferent frequencies which were measured simultaneously.
Figure 8 shows that while the moduli decreased with time
for all the samples, the slopes of G0 curves decreased with
increasing the clay content. Only PNC5 showed the
decrease in G0 with time at high frequency (100 rad/sec),
G0 was constant with time at medium frequency (10 rad/
sec) and G0 was slightly improved with time at low fre-
quency (1 rad/sec). This has been brought out by confirm-
ing the data from nanocomposites samples at 1 rad/sec as
shown in the inset in Fig. 8. It is well known that inter-
connected structures with anisometric fillers result in an
apparent yield stress which is visible in dynamic measure-
ment by a plateau of G0 or G00 versus frequency at low
frequencies. This effect is more pronounced in G0 than G00
[15, 26]. Therefore, an increase in the moduli and viscos-
ity, at low frequency range, reflects an interconnected
structure and reinforcement of the molten PLA by cloisite
30B. The reinforcement effect results from the interac-
tions between the components due to hydrogen bonding
of hydroxyl groups in the organic ‘‘surfactant’’ in the
organoclay and carbonyl groups of PLA chain segments.
The interactions are stronger for system having the larger
interface area; thus being related to higher dispersion of
the organoclay in the PLA matrix [15, 23].
Extensional Rheology
The extensional viscosity for pure PLA and its nano-
composites at different extensional strain rates (0.05, 0.1,
and 0.5 sec21) at 1808C are presented in Fig. 9. The
FIG. 6. Complex viscosity (g*) of PLA nanocomposites.
FIG. 7. Stress relaxation data of PLA nanocomposites.
FIG. 8. Multi wave temperature ramp test of PLA nanocomposites at
different frequency.
DOI 10.1002/pen POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2012 229
results for pure PLA showed no strong strain hardening
characteristics very similar to PNC1, etc., nanocompo-
sites. Similar results were shown by Pasanovic-Zujo et al.
and Gupta et al. While working with different EVA nano-
composites [27, 28].
The extensional viscosity, gE(t), in the linear viscoelastic
range can be determined using the following equation [29].
ZEðtÞ ¼ 3Xi
gi ti 1� exp�t
ti
� �� �(1)
where ti is the characteristic relaxation time (sec) and gi isthe relaxation modulus (Pa).
As reported earlier [30] for PP/clay nanocomposites, the
Trouton ratio, (TR), defined as the ratio of uniaxial exten-
sional viscosity to shear viscosity was higher than 3, which
is typical for Newtonian fluids. In polyisobutylene systems
filled with alumina powder (diameter \1 lm), Trouton’s
law was shown not to be obeyed for higher filler content in
uniaxial flow [28]. In this study, PLA-nanocomposites with
high clay content also showed a similar response.
Figure 9a–d shows the transient extensional viscosity
as a function of time for the PLA nanocomposites.
McKinley and Hassager suggested that beyond the maxi-
mum Hencky strain, the elongating polymeric strip
becomes unstable due to free surface perturbations, which
grow and result in necking of the sample followed by
complete rupture [31]. It can be seen in Fig. 9 that the
elongational viscosity did not change with increasing the
strain rate, only samples ruptured earlier at faster rates.
Figure 10 shows that the extensional viscosity increased
with increasing clay loading at two different strain rate. The
extensional viscosity of PLA nanocomposite up to PNC3
showed small strain hardening behavior before the rupture.
But strain hardening phenomena was slightly decreased for
PNC5. This phenomenon could be explained by the forma-
tion of exfoliated and intercalated structure of PLA nano-
composites. XRD and TEM results showed the PNC1 with
the exfoliated structure. PNC3 showed exfoliated and par-
tially intercalated structure and PNC5 showed intercalated
structure. Intercalated structure or aggregated parts act as
weak points, so before the strain hardening behavior was
observed, samples were broken [31].
FIG. 9. Transient extensional viscosity at various extension rates (a) PNC0, (b) PNC1, (c) PNC3, and
(d) PNC5.
FIG. 10. Transient extensional viscosity of PLA nanocomposites at the
strain rate of (a) 0.05 sec21 and (b) 0.5 sec21.
230 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2012 DOI 10.1002/pen
Dynamic-Mechanical and Thermal Analysis
Dynamic-mechanical and thermal analysis (DMTA)
studies were performed on solid nanocomposite samples
to see the effect of temperature on their storage modulus,
loss modulus, and tan d. For all the samples the following
characteristics were observed for the storage modulus
with rising temperature (Fig. 11a): a gradual decrease in
the region—908C to 508C, a rapid drop below 60–708Cdue to the glass transition temperature (Tg), and an
increase in the cold crystallization range (around 1008C).With increased nanoclay loading, an increase in the stor-
age modulus in the whole temperature range was
observed. The loss modulus (Fig. 11b) changed with
increasing temperature showing a maximum at about
658C, which corresponded to segmental relaxations
related to glass transition of polylactic acid. The maxima
of the loss modulus around 1008C reflected an increase in
the mechanical loss due to the cold crystallization. How-
ever, additions of nanoclay particle in PLA matrix did not
show significant shift and broadening on the maxima of
the tan d curves.
CONCLUSIONS
This article presents a comprehensive melt rheologi-
cal study of PLA nanocomposite. The frequency sweep
data showed a monotonic increase in storage moduli,
loss moduli, and dynamic viscosities with nanoclay
content. In the case of PNC5, a pseudo-solid-like
behavior was observed. The PNC5 multi wave ramp
test showed that at low frequency (1 rad/sec) G0 was
slightly improved with time due to formation of perco-
lating network structure. The transient extensional vis-
cosity increased with increase in the clay content.
Viscoelastic spectra (DMTA) showed an increase of
the storage and loss moduli with the increase of the
organoclay content and improved dispersion. WAXD
and TEM results indicated that PNC1 showed the
exfoliated structure, PNC3 showed exfoliated and par-
tially intercalated structure, and PNC5 showed exfoli-
ated and intercalated structure.
REFERENCES
1. J.R. Dorgan, J.A. Cicero, and J. Janzen, J. Appl. Polym.Sci., 86, 2828 (2002).
2. S. Singh, A.K. Ghosh, S.N. Maiti, R. Gupta, and S.N. Bhat-
tacharya, J. Polym. Eng., 30, 361 (2010).
3. S. Jacobsen, H.G. Fritz, and Ph. Degee, Polymer, 41, 3395(2000).
4. J.A. Cicero and J.R. Dorgan, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 86, 2839(2002).
5. N. Ogata, G. Jimenez, and H. Kawai, J. Polym. Sci. Part B:Polym. Phys., 35, 389 (1997).
6. G. Shu-Ying, J. Ren, and B. Dong, J. Polym. Sci. Part B:Polym. Phys., 45, 3189 (2007).
7. M.A. Paul, M. Alexandre, P. Degee, C. Henrist, and A. Rul-
mont, Polymer, 44, 443 (2003).
8. S.S. Ray, P. Maiti, and M. Okamoto, Macromolecules, 35,3104 (2002).
9. J.H. Chang, Y.U. An, and D. Cho, Polymer, 44, 3715
(2003).
10. S.S. Ray and M. Okamoto, Polymer, 44, 857 (2003).
11. S.S. Ray and M. Okamoto, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 24,815 (2003).
12. P. Liviu-Iulian, J.L. Hans, and R.D. John, Macromolecules,34, 1384 (2001).
13. W. Defeng, W. Liang, W. Lanfeng, and Z. Ming, Polym.Degrad. Stab., 91, 3149 (2006).
14. S.S. Ray and M. Okamoto, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 288,936 (2003).
15. Di. Yingwei, I. Salvatore, Di.M. Ernesto, and N.
Luigi, J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys., 43, 689
(2005).
16. P. Maiti, Y. Kazunobu, and M. Okamoto, Chem. Mater., 14,4654 (2002).
17. S.S. Ray and M. Bousmina, Prog. Mater. Sci., 50, 962
(2005).
18. S.S. Ray and M. Okamoto, Chem. Mater., 15, 1456
(2003).
19. S.K. Lee, D.G. Seong, and J.R. Youn, Fibers Polym., 6, 289(2005).
20. M. Pluta, J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys., 44, 3392
(2006).
21. V. Krikorian and D.J. Pochan, Chem. Mater., 15, 4317
(2003).
FIG. 11. Temperature dependencies of (a) storage modulus and (b) loss
modulus for PLA nanocomposites.
DOI 10.1002/pen POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2012 231
22. I. Sotirios and Z. Ioannis, Eur. Polym. J., 43, 2191 (2007).
23. M. Pluta, J.K. Jeszka, and G. Boiteux, Eur. Polym. J., 43,2819 (2007).
24. J.X. Ren, A.S. Silva, and R. Krishnamoorti, Macromole-cules, 33, 3739 (2000).
25. S.S. Ray, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 12, 811 (2006).
26. Y. Di Iannace, S. Maio, and E. Nicolais, J. Polym. Sci. PartB: Polym. Phys., 41, 670 (2003).
27. V. Pasanovic-Zujo, R.K. Gupta, and S.N. Bhattacharya,
Rheol. Acta, 43, 99 (2004).
28. R.K. Gupta, V. Pasanovic-Zujo, and S.N. Bhattacharya, J.Non-Newtn. Fluid Mech., 128, 116 (2005).
29. H.M. Laun, J. Rheol., 30, 459 (1986).
30. M. Okamoto, P.H. Nam, and P. Maiti, Nanoletters, 1, 295(2001).
31. G.H. McKinley and O. Hassager, J. Rheol., 43, 1195 (1999).
232 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2012 DOI 10.1002/pen