Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TIME SENSITIVE DOCUMENT ESTOPPEL CONDITIONS APPLY
Marc-Adrian: Hammond (1) ("We") or ("Us") 60 Borrowdale Close
Berry, NSW
2535
21 January 2021
OFFICE FOUND Attention: The Chief Magistrate His Honour Judge Graeme Henson Level 5, Downing Centre
143-147 Liverpool St,
Sydney, NSsw
2000
Email: [email protected]
Within the universal maxim of law 'notice to agent is notice to principal and notice to principal is notice to agent'. All addressed parties Jointly and Severally as well as
their Successors, Nominees and assigns
Re: Case number # H-78220481
Dear Clerk/Judge,
Please find enclosed my submission of the Letter of Rogatory for relief, to be fled in relation to case number H-78220481. Please enter this fling into the record, whereby I will await a response within the time frame mentioned, failure to respond will constitute your agreement that I will then make this document public, and file it on the public register.
By: Marc-Adrian: Hammond
The Grantorl Executor/ Directorl Heirl Sole Shareholder Chief Executive Officer
Secured Party Creditor Principal and Executive Beneficiary
For TM MARC ADRIAN HAMMOND ESTATEO
Mono
wITHOUT RECOURSE-WITHOUT PREJUDICE - NON ASsUMPSIT
All Errors and Omission's Excepted
END NOTICE
Page 1 of 8
TIME SENSITIVE DOCUMENT ESTOPPEL CONDITIONS APPLY
Marc-Adrian: Hammond ("") ("We") or ("Us")
60 Borrowdale Close Berry, NSw
2535
21 January 2021.
LETTER ROGATORY FOR RELIEF Attention: The Chief Magistrate His Honour Judge Graeme Henson Level 5, Downing Centre
143-147 Liverpool St,
Sydney, NSW
2000
Within the universal maxim of law 'notice to agent is notice to principal and notice to principal is notice to agent'. All addressed parties Jointly and Severally as well as
their Successors, Nominees and assigns
Re: Case number# H-78220481
I, Marc-Adrian: the House of Hammond, hereinafter Claimant, Executor for the MARC ADRIAN HAMMOND cestui que trust, to notice the Court of my Letter Rogatory to the Downing Street Local Court, and demand my name be cleared of this alleged criminal case' for the reasons set forth below:
1. I, Marc-Adrian: the House of Hammond, am of legal age of majority, of sound mind and competent to testify. I, Marc-Adrian: the House of Hammond, hereinafter referred to as Claimant, hereby certify and declare on the unlimited commercial liability of Claimant that the following facts are true, and correct to the best of the Claimants personal knowledge, understanding and belief.
2. Claimant is domiciled in the nation/state of New South Wales, a member republic of the Commonwealth of Australia, established by the Articles of Federation and later perfected by the addition of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
3. Claimant is aware that all courts are operating in Admiralty Jurisdiction, which has no jurisdiction on the land, and no jurisdiction over the sentient living man.
Claimant is aware the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA is now a corporation, an entity with an ABN, listed on the Securities and Exchange
Page 2 of 8
Commission and no longer has any jurisdiction against the living people.
5. Claimant is aware the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA signed up to UNIDROIT on 20th March 1973.
6. Claimant is aware the Bill of Rights 1688 offers protection under Section 12, which states That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction, are illegal and void."
7. Claimant is aware that he is not a "particular person and is a sentient, living
being.
8. Claimant is aware the Lieber Code is the code that is used by UNIDROIT, and has no jurisdiction overa sentient, living being.
9. Claimant is aware that the Royal Styles and Titles Act 1973 created the Queen of Australia" without a referendum, and as such has no jurisdiction over all sentient and living beings.
10.Claimant is aware the Queen is required to take the Coronation Oath to uphold the scriptures laid out in the King James Version of the Bible, and as such the fictitious "Queen of Australia" has no lawful authority whatsoever.
11.Claimant is aware that under Section 71 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution, a Magistrates Court, with a single magistrate presiding, is not a court of competent jurisdiction, and is unconstitutional.
12. Claimant is aware that a Magistrates Court, is not a Constitutional, Chapter ll Court, and cannot lawfully impose fines or penalties.
13.Claimant is aware he is entitled to a trial by jury, in a court of summary
jurisdiction.
14.Claimant is aware that as per Section 92 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution, "On the imposition of uniform duties of customs, trade, commerce and intercourse among the states, shall be absolutely free of levy.
15.Claimant is aware that under Section 109 of the Commonwealth of Australia constitution, "When a law is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, to the extent of the inconsistency, shal be invalid."
16.Claimant is aware that any and all road rules refer to "persons", claimant is aware he is not a person and is a sentient, living being, and as such has a free right to travel.
17.Claimant is aware that there are many case laws in regard to jurisdiction, and once jurisdiction is challenged, the case cannot proceed.
18.Claimant hereby requests this case be heard in a court of summary jurisdiction, with the injured party present, and a jury of 12.
Page 3 of 8
19.Claimant is aware that Chief Justice Murray Gleeson declared in 2001 "No citizen can be judged by anything other than a court that complies with Section 71 of the Commonwealth Constitution of Australia.
20.Claimant is aware that this alleged 'Court' that has scheduled a
case/cause/claim against me is not really a 'court' as per the Constitution of
the Commonwealth of Australia, but rather a tribunal operating as a private
corporation.
21.Claimant is aware of the fraud that goes on behind the scenes of these alleged 'criminal cases', which are really civil claims in equity, and the steps taken to securitize these civil claims, without giving full disclosure to the
people. Iam hereby letting the court know that I am opting out of any contract and do not allow any documents regarding me or my cestui que trust to be
securitized and sold to any investors etc.
22. Claimant is aware of the fraudulent process is as follows: All cases are civil,
though often fraudulently called criminal. The courts are operating under trust
law, assuming the 'Defendant' is a decedent. After finding the alleged Defendant' guilty, the court clerks sell the judgments to the Federal Courts.
Since the Defendant is a 'decedent, the court officials consider themselves as
a beneficiary.
23.Claimant is aware that when a Judge asks if a person understands, he/she is asking if the person is liable for the bond. I am not responsible for the bond of
this/these cases, but I will appoint the Judge as Trustee/Fiduciary and be the
beneficiary of all proceeds.
24. The judgments are stamped with something to the effect of "Pay To The
Order Of.. " on the back and taken to the federal discount window. The judgment now becomes a 'note'.
25. The notes are then pooled together and then become securities, which are yet again pooled together and sold as bonds.
26. Claimant is aware a Bid Bond, a performance Bond and a Payment Bond are created in my name using my "alleged" signature, by the Court, for the purpose of probating the MARC ADRIAN HAMMOND Estate.
27.Claimant is aware these bonds are liens against me.
28.Claimant is aware everything filed into court is securitized without the knowledge or consent of the people or of all parties.
Page 4 of8
29. All'criminal' cases not heard in a Chapter Ill Court of jurisdiction, are really civil, however, the courts again commit fraud by labelling the case as criminal. All cases which are plead out or have a 'guilty conviction' label the civil
defendant (through unlawful conversion) as felons, when they are not. This is fraud upon the people at large, and certainly fraud upon the alleged Defendants
30.Claimant is aware that all securities are then deposited with the DTC in New
York.
31. Claimant is aware An Escrow Agent is used as a go-between between the Clerk's Office and the DTCC Clearing House in Washington DC, whereby they are listed for trading, of which I am entitled to the proceeds.
32.Claimant is aware that all of the lawyers involved in these court cases are acting as private debt collectors according to the FDCPA (Title 15 $1692).
The BAR Association exempts them from having to be registered as such;
however, they operate through call warrants, which are like a put, or a call. Doing margin calls is where they converta case through (similar to a Writ of Execution) and use the case number to buy equity securities.
33. Claimant is aware that everything filed into court is securitized and turned into
negotiable instruments, and then turn them into securities. These items are
sold as commercial items, calling them 'distress debts' (Unifund). The items
are then pooled together in what is now called a hedge fund, where they are sold globally.
34.Claimant is aware that anytime when there is risk management involved, it is
for the securities. This is an underwriting company. When the hedge funds are
going into the global market, they go through Luer Hermes, a bond holder and
underwriting company and subdivision of Alliance SE, of Munich, Germany
(Pimco Bonds).
35.Claimant is aware that after 9 months, all paper is converted to a 'securities tus. This is defined in Title 15 $77(a)(b)(1) and then considered to be a
investment contract. The paper is endorsed to become a security, and the
trust is then collapsed.
36.Claimant is aware 'courts' have an account with the IMF (International
Monetary Fund) under Interpol. The Judges involved and the Prosecutor
involved do not have an accessible Oath of Office, because they cover up the
fact that the oath of office is between them and the IMF 37.Claimant is aware Judges in Australia and all Lawyers and prosecutors are
actually employees of the IMF and have expatriated out of the Commonwealth
Page 5 of 8
of A
ustr
alia
. T
hey
are
now
unr
egis
tere
d fo
reig
n ag
ents
und
er T
itle
22,
whi
ch
stat
es a
ll fo
reig
n ag
ents
mus
t b
e re
gist
ered
.
38
. Cla
iman
t is
aw
are
co
urt
ju
dg
men
ts a
re d
epo
site
d w
ith
the
IMF.
Sin
ce t
his
case
obv
ious
ly i
nvol
ves
me,
I h
ave
a dr
awin
g rig
ht to
all
proc
eeds
. See
UC
C
$3
-30
5 a
nd
$3
-30
6.
Th
e c
ou
rt j
ud
gm
ents
are
mo
no
po
lize
d a
cco
rdin
g t
o T
itle
16,
whi
ch i
s a
viol
atio
n of
ant
i-tr
ust
law
s, a
nd a
lso
unfa
ir t
rade
pra
ctic
es.
39.C
laim
ant
is a
war
e th
at I
ndic
tmen
ts a
re T
rue
Bill
s, m
eani
ng t
hey
are
nego
tiab
le
inst
rum
ents
. T
he p
rose
cuto
r fa
iled
to
giv
e m
e a
10
99
OID
sh
ow
ing
me a
s th
e
reci
pie
nt
of
the
fun
ds,
wh
ich
is
a fr
aud
up
on
me.
In
my
case
, I
hav
e n
ot
been
ind
icte
d,
bu
t st
ill
req
uest
a
10
99
OID
, u
nle
ss t
he
cou
rt w
ish
es t
o cl
ose
th
is
acco
un
t.
40
.Cla
iman
t is
aw
are
th
e un
law
ful
fun
ds,
th
rou
gh
fr
aud
an
d
dec
epti
on
, are
dep
osi
ted
in
the
Fed
eral
Rese
rve B
ank
of
New
Yor
k an
d t
hey
hav
e n
ot
pai
d t
he
tax
on
th
is i
nco
me.
A
cco
rdin
g t
o t
he
IRC
, th
is i
s a
$7
20
1 o
f T
itle
26
vio
lati
on
(wilf
ul f
ailu
re t
o fil
e w
ith t
he i
nten
t to
ev
ade
the
tax)
.
41.C
laim
ant i
s aw
are
that
a c
opy
of t
he
Dep
osit
ory
Res
olut
ion
Agr
eem
ent w
as n
ot
mad
e a
vai
lab
le
to
me f
rom
th
e C
lerk
of
Co
urt
. T
he
Cle
rk o
f C
ou
rt m
ak
es
depo
sits
int
o th
e F
eder
al R
eser
ve
Ban
k of
New
Yor
k vi
a el
ectr
onic
fun
ds
tran
sfer
s (E
FT
's).
42. T
he C
lerk
has
a P
MIA
(P
riva
te M
oney
Inv
estm
ent A
ccou
nt),
whi
ch a
lso
has
a
go
ver
nm
ent
cod
e. A
cco
rdin
g t
o C
lerk
s P
rax
is,
the
Cle
rk o
f th
e C
ou
rt i
s th
e
Reg
istr
ar i
n A
dmir
alty
.
43.A
ccor
ding
to
the
IRS
$620
9 D
ecod
ing
Man
ual
and
the
AD
P (A
utom
ated
Dat
a P
rocess
ing
Man
ual
), a
ll 1
09
9's
are
Cla
ss 5
gif
t an
d e
state
tax
es.
I am
ask
ing
for
a 1
09
9 O
ID i
n th
is c
ase
, as
I am
no
t w
illi
ng t
o g
ift
yo
u t
he
pro
ceed
s.
I am
here
by a
skin
g fo
r th
e pr
ocee
ds in
the
ir e
ntire
ty,
incl
udin
g in
tere
st.
44. C
laim
ant
has
nev
er p
ledg
ed m
y ri
ghts
or
my
body
to
any
gifti
ng
prog
ram
,
incl
ud
ing
an
y c
ou
rt o
r co
urt
pro
cess
.
45.C
laim
ant
is n
ot a
cha
rita
ble
orga
niza
tion
. I
dem
and
all
fund
s fr
om t
he c
ases
(C
uren
t and
pas
t cas
es)
be
sen
t to
me
with
in 3
0 d
ays
or I
will
fle
com
plai
nts
to
the
IRS
and
SE
C e
xpla
inin
g th
e fr
aud
and
thef
t co
mm
itte
d up
on m
e, a
nd i
ssue
a 1
09
9 O
ID.
46.C
laim
ant
dem
and
s m
y n
ame
and
my
cest
ui q
ue
trus
t na
me,
MA
RC
AD
RIA
N
HA
MM
ON
D (
and
all
deri
vati
ves)
be
rem
oved
fro
m
any
and
all
gove
rnm
ent
dat
abas
es i
ndic
atin
g ba
d cr
edit
, co
mm
erci
al l
iens
and
/or
the
titl
es o
f cr
imin
al,
Pag
e 6
of
8
felo
n an
d/or
con
vict
ed f
elon
be
rem
oved
im
med
iate
ly a
nd p
erm
anen
tly
nunc
p
ro t
un
c.
47.I
her
eby
noti
ce t
he C
ourt
th
atl
am t
he e
xecu
tor
of th
e ce
stui
qu
e tr
ust o
f M
AR
C
AD
RIA
N
HA
MM
ON
D
Acc
ordi
ng
to
Titl
e 26
$3
03
& $
7701
, co
mpa
nies
, co
rpo
rati
on
s, a
nd
ass
oci
atio
ns
an
d t
rust
s are
all
deced
en
ts.
Th
is m
ean
s m
y a
ll
capi
tal
lett
er n
ame
is a
leg
al e
stat
e.
My
all
capi
tal
lett
er n
ame
falls
int
o th
is
clas
s.
dire
ct
all
of
the
affa
irs
and
fina
ncia
l af
fair
s o
f MA
RC
AD
RIA
N
HAM
MON
D 4
8.C
laim
an
t h
ereb
y r
eq
uest
s th
is c
ase
/acco
un
t b
e c
lose
d a
nd
no
fu
rth
er s
tep
s
tak
en t
o s
ecu
riti
ze it
.
49
.Cla
iman
t is
aw
are
and
kn
ow
s th
at in
th
e ev
en
t th
at a
ny
op
po
siti
on
to
this
"L
ette
r
of R
ogat
ory
of "
Mar
c-A
dria
n: H
amm
ond"
mus
t be
don
e by
reb
utti
ng e
ach
and
ev
ery
poin
t, po
int
by p
oint
and
mak
ing
said
reb
utta
l pu
blic
rec
ord
with
in 3
0 (t
hirt
y)
day
s of
th
e re
cord
ing
of t
his
"Let
ter
of
Rog
ator
y of
"M
arc-
Adr
ian:
Ham
mon
d".
50
. C
laim
ant
has
no
thin
g f
urt
her
to
state
at
this
tim
e.
IRS
Inst
ruct
ion
s P
ub
lica
tio
ns
a.
Pub
lica
tion
: G
ener
al I
nstr
ucti
on f
or F
orm
s 10
99,
1098
, 549
8 &
W-2
g-
Sec
tion
"" "
Sta
tem
ents
to R
ecip
ient
s (B
orro
wer
, D
ebto
rs,
Don
ors,
In
sure
d's,
Par
tici
pant
s, P
ayer
/Bor
row
ers,
Pol
icyh
olde
rs, S
tude
nts,
T
ran
sfer
ors
, o
r W
inn
ers
on
Cer
tain
For
ms)
".
b.
Pu
bli
cati
on
: 12
12 O
IDs,
pag
e 7,
No
min
ees
c. Pu
blic
atio
n: I
nstru
ctio
ns fo
r Fo
rms
1099
-INT
& 1
099-
0ID
-"Sp
ecifi
c In
stru
ctio
ns
for
For
m 1
099-
0ID
". S
ecti
on
OID
: R
epo
rtin
g O
ID
Ref
eren
ces
to O
IDs
d.
Pu
bli
cati
on
: C
har
ter
On
e "P
erso
nal
Dep
osi
t A
cco
un
t A
gre
emen
t, S
ecti
on
1
7(c
&(d
) -
Inte
rest
Wit
hh
old
ing
. (
Ban
k's
Po
licy
& A
gre
em
en
t)
e.
Pu
bli
cati
on
: O
per
atin
g C
ircu
lar
No.
10, A
pp
lica
tio
n f
or
Inte
rest
In
com
e an
d
defi
nit
ion
s.
f.L
aw:
Titl
e 26
USC
604
9 -
Rep
orte
d R
etur
ns R
egar
ding
Pay
men
ts o
f In
tere
st.
9.
Law
: T
itle
26
CF
R 1
.12
71
th
ru 1
.12
73
-O
rig
inal
Issu
ed
Dis
co
un
ts (
OID
)
def
ined
an
d p
roce
du
res.
h.
L
aw:
Tit
le 2
6 U
SC 1
271
thru
127
4 O
rig
inal
Issu
ed D
isco
un
t (O
ID)
det
erm
inat
ion
s.
i. La
w: S
tatu
tes a
t Lar
ge, V
olum
e 13
, pag
e 99
thru
118
-Nat
iona
l Cur
renc
y A
ct.
Pag
e 7
of 8
i.
Law
: T
itle
26
US
C 1
63
& 1
63
(e)
-In
tere
st &
OID
as
tax
ded
ucti
on
.
k.
Law
: T
itle
12:
Ban
k a
nd
Ban
king
, 1
2 U
SC 4
12 A
pply
ing
for
FRN
,
Thi
s LE
TTER
RO
GA
TORY
FO
R RE
LIEF
pre
sent
ed th
is th
e 21
day
of J
anua
ry
2021
By:
Mar
c-A
dria
n: H
amm
on
d
Th
e G
ran
tor/
Exe
cuto
r/ D
irec
tor/
Hei
rl
Sol
e S
hare
hold
er/ C
hief
Exe
cuti
ve O
ffic
er
Secu
red
Part
y C
red
ito
r/ P
rin
cip
al a
nd
E
xecu
tive
Ben
efic
iary
F
or
TM M
AR
C A
DR
IAN
HA
MM
ON
D E
ST
AT
EO
Mae
anlo
nd
WIT
HO
UT
RE
CO
UR
SE
-WIT
HO
UT
PR
EJU
DIC
E-
NO
N A
SS
UM
PS
IT
All
Ero
rs a
nd
Om
issi
on
's E
xce
pte
d
EN
D N
OT
ICE
Pag
e 8
of
8
