Monetary Policy Practice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    1/20

    PRACTICE

    IN

    MALAYSIA

    Presenter

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    2/20

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    3/20

    Preface . DEFINITION OF MONETPOLICY

    The actions of a central bank,currency board or other regulatorycommittee that determine the sizeand rate of growth of the moneysupply, which in turn affects interestrates. Monetary policy is maintained

    through actions such as increasingthe interest rate, or changing theamount of money banks need tokeep in the vault (bank reserves).

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    4/20

    Macroeconomic Effects GENERAL

    The global financial crisis of 2008-its epic center in the United Statebrought enormous ramifications fworld economy.

    Hence, although the Malaysian ecwas insulated from the direct effefinancial exposure because the ne

    derivatives were not allowed intocountry, the global financial crisisdoubt on the Governments planscollapse in exports and a slowdowforeign direct investment (FDI).

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    5/20

    Whereas the Governmtargeted an annual avGDP growth rate of 4.the period 2006-2010International Moneta(IMF) forecasted Mala

    GDP per capita to con5.1% in 2009 and -0.42010.

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    6/20

    Macroeconomic Effects -GDP andComponents-

    The contagion from a crash in globalaggregate demand on the Malaysianeconomy can be seen from a numberof sectors and markets. The overallGDP growth rate of Malaysia sloweddown to 0.1% in the last quarter of

    2008 and contracted by -6.2% in thefirst quarter of 2009 before fallingfurther by -3.9% in the second quarterof the year.

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    7/20

    Malaysias economy has cleentered a recession followidecline in GDP over the firsquarters of 2009. The contrexpected to further reduceMalaysias capacity to achie

    2020 per capita income ofUS$15,341 under the visionprogramme. Malaysia is alrexpected to record a 26% sGDP from its 2020 vision pa

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    8/20

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    9/20

    Government Responses: Mitigating Negative Effects

    Mitigating theNegative Effects

    Monetary Policy Financial Policy

    The Governments approach to the present c

    to that of the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis, w

    public sector taking a dominant role in revivi

    economy. The difference lies in the size of thpackages due to the drop in export demand.

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    10/20

    Government Responses- MonetaryPolicy-

    The major challenge Malaysia hadto contend with was thetransmission of the globalfinancial crisis from the monetaryto the real sector of the worldsmajor economies, which hadcaused exports to collapse.

    Another important challenge waspresented by the sharp decline inFDI inflows that furtherconstrained aggregate demandand the private sector.

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    11/20

    Mitigating theNegative Effects

    Monetary Policy Financial Policy

    Rising global commodity and food prices

    built up inflationary expectations in early

    2008. Inflation peaked in July and August

    that year and, as a result, headline inflation

    recorded an increase of 8.5%.

    The removal of fuel subsidies in

    June 2008 further pushed up

    domestic fuel price by 40.4%.

    Even with rising inflationary pressures, BNM kept

    interest rates unchanged at 3.5% until late-Novem

    2008. The interest rate had been maintained at th

    level since 2006.

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    12/20

    * The Bank was reluctant to increase interest rates because it hadnot yet seen the secondary effect of price increases being

    transmitted into the system. Moreover, it feared that any interest

    rate increase would push inflation higher.

    The lowering of the Overnight Policy R

    November 2008 by 25 basis points to 3

    January and February 2009 by 75 and 5points respectively to the current level

    done only after the full impact of the g

    began to be felt in Malaysia By that tim

    inflationary pressures had dissipated w

    collapse of oil and other commodity pr

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    13/20

    expansionary monetary policywas to support the fiscalstimulus introduced earlier. Theinterest rate reduction wasaccompanied by a lowering ofthe Statutory ReserveRequirement (SRR) to 3.5% to

    reduce the cost ofintermediation.

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    14/20

    The easing of interest rates does not seemto have been particularly successful in

    maintaining the velocity of money supply

    (as measured by M2) at the 2008 level

    From July 2008 to January 2009, M2 grew by

    more than 10% per month. Since February

    2009, however, the M2 monthly growth rate

    has moderated substantially. Interest rate

    reductions had a positive influence on the

    domestic private debt securities market.

    Between July and December 2008, the value of

    new private debt securities issued had

    dropped, with the month of November

    recording the worst slump.

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    15/20

    *However, since March 2009, the value ofbond issues almost doubled compared with t

    preceding six-month period

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    16/20

    Mitigating theNegative Effects

    Monetary Policy Financial Policy

    The domestic banking sector was strengthened a

    1997-1998 crisis and, being more resilient now, is

    for further liberalisation. To support this effort, th

    Government introduced a deposit insurance sche

    Perbadanan Insuran Deposit Malaysia (PIDM). In

    countries in the region introduced guarantees for

    deposits to allay fears of the collapse of financial

    and to discourage capital outflows. Malaysia expe

    large capital outflows from March until Septembe

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    17/20

    The lending activities of commercia

    lethargic despite lower OPR, loweradditional funds available for loans

    Loan growth could have benefitedearlier interest rate reductions as sThe decline in loan growth began iand reached a serious depth betwe2008 and January 2009. Loans begain June 2009, with the loan-deposicommercial banks improving from

    to 77.35 in July 2009.

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    18/20

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    19/20

    Between August 2008 andJanuary 2009, BNM introducedthree additional financingincentives and schemes forSMEs. The Assistance Facilityaims to help viable SMEs with

    temporary cash flow problemsby offering loans with interestrates as low as 4% per annum.

    In November 2008, RM200 millio

    channeled to the Micro Enterprise

    can be accessed by SMEs through participating financial institutions

    normal credit approval process. A

    SME Assistance Guarantee Schem

    introduced in January 2009 with a

    RM2 billion for SME financing.

  • 7/30/2019 Monetary Policy Practice

    20/20

    CONCLUSION

    The improving prospects of the Malaysian economy since thof 2009 are partly due to the upturn in the global economy. rapidly changing global economy, it is important that Malay

    maintains strong fundamentals and a robust financial sector

    Malaysian Government should be prepared for possible meprevent sharp price rises, especially for essential goods. Like

    monitoring of strategic global developments that can affectsignificantly will be crucial in this rapidly changing environm