MojAtta

Attac:\users\s

IntroEacheach

123

The iMojaRegisuppeach

jave Regachmen

chment 7 – andrac\documents\mojave

oduction h of the three p

Project serve

1. Mojave R2. Hi-Desert3. Leak Dete

inclusion andave Integratedon qualifies aorts the deterProject.

gion Propt 7 – Disa

Disadvantage\grants\dwr round 3\attach

proposed Projes a DAC in m

Region Commt Sewer Colleection Service

d participationd Regional Was disadvantagmination of D

position 84advantag

ged Commuments\attachment 7\att7_2

jects in this Pmore than 80%

mercial, Industection Systemes for Mojave

n of economicWater Managem

ged (see figurDACs for each

4 IRWM Rged Com

unity Assistan2015irwm_dac_1of3_80615

Proposal addre% of the area

trial and Institm Phase 1A

e Region 100%

cally disadvanment (IRWMre on the nexth Project. Als

Round 3 Gmmunity A

nce5.docx

esses a criticabeing served

tutional (CII)

% DAC Smal

ntaged commuM) Plan proces

t page). Projecso, the critica

Grant Assistance

al supply for a by the Projec

) Turf Phase I

ll Water Syst

unities (DACss, as approximcts are discus

al water suppl

e

a disadvantagcts. The three

II Removal Pr

tems Phase 1

Cs) was considmately 79 perssed below anly needs of the

7-1

ged communie projects incl

rogram

Program

dered essentiarcent of the M

nd include infe DACs are id

ty (DAC) andlude:

al to the Mojave formation thatdentified for

d

t

MojAtta

Attac:\users\s

The Mthe D79 peDepa

ProjeProjedrougRegitwo crelatiMojaalongadjacMojathe aBasinof thethe WAdjuMoroAreafromused Valle

WithBasinVallesuppgroungrounproduAny systeor turgroun

Bothavailto kegrounAny Turf reducsuppstretcsupp

jave Regachmen

chment 7 – andrac\documents\mojave

Mojave RegioDisadvantagedercent of the Martment of Wa

ects that reducect (SWP) durght. Most of on groundwacompleted adjing to the majave Basin Judg the Mojave cent areas are ave River Grorea is referredn Area and is e Mojave Bas

Warren Valleyudication, locaongo Basin/Joa (“Morongo”

m the Warren Vto supply the

ey and its env

hin the Mojavn Adjudicatioey Basin Judglies are used tndwater basinndwater production safe yirecycled wate

em distributiorf removed dindwater prod

h adjudicationlability of impeep historicallndwater basinProject (suchRemoval Pro

ces the demanly results in mching out thisly.

gion Propt 7 – Disa

Disadvantage\grants\dwr round 3\attach

M

on CII Turf Pd CommunitieMojave Regioater Resource

ce the use of pring the currethe Mojave

ater is coveredjudications, jor basins: the

dgment (basinRiver and referred to as

oundwater Bad to as the Moincluded as p

sin Judgment)y Basin ated within thohnson Valley). GroundwatValley Basin e Town of Yuvirons.

e Groundwaton and the Wagment, SWP to recharge ns in areas wh

duction exceedield of the baser delivered, n losses correirectly offsets

duction.

ns are reliant uported SWP sly overdraftedns within balah as this Phaseogram) that nd for the SWmore flexibilits valuable imp

position 84advantag

ged Commuments\attachment 7\att7_2

Mojave Reg

Phase II Remoes and Populaon qualifies aes (DWR’s) 2

pumped grouent

d by

e ns

s the asin; ojave part ) and

he y ter is

ucca

er arren

here ds the sin.

ected s

upon supply d ance. e II

WP ty for ported

4 IRWM Rged Com

unity Assistan2015irwm_dac_1of3_80615

gion CII Tu

oval Program ation figure s

as disadvantag2015 IRWM G

undwater will

Round 3 Gmmunity A

nce5.docx

rf Phase II

will serve thehown below

ged , based onGuidelines, Ap

reduce the de

Grant Assistance

Removal P

e entire Moja(an overviewn 2010 Censuppendix G.

emand for im

e

Program

ave IRWM Rew of the Mojavus population

mported suppli

7-2

egion. As canve Region), apdata and the

ies from the S

n be seen on pproximatelyCalifornia

State Water

y

MojAtta

Attac:\users\s

As sh(inclu100%IRWMis me

This of Yu

•

•

•

•

jave Regachmen

chment 7 – andrac\documents\mojave

hown on Figuuding all phas

% of the ProjeM Guidelineset (80% of the

Sewer Collecucca Valley:

• Wastewat

• WastewatRegional amendmePhase 1 pscheduledMay 19, 2Board colindicated septic syshas causedquality obof ground(c) conditnuisance, and (d) unof the quaprimary sfor properAssessme

• Constructcollectionabate exisadditionalcontamina

• Replacemsystems wprovides fwastewatecommunit

gion Propt 7 – Disa

Disadvantage\grants\dwr round 3\attach

Hi-

ure 3, the Hi-Dses), and its e

ect will serve s, Appendix Ge statewide M

ction System

ter treatment n

ter treatment rBoard’s Wate

ent on septic trohibition cur

d to become e2016. The Regllected evidenthat the contitems within td: (a) violatio

bjectives; (b) dwater benefictions of pollutand/or contam

nreasonable dality of state wource of drinkrties located went District.

tion of wastewn systems necesting or prevel groundwateration

ment of failingwith a system for the long-teer treatment nty

position 84advantag

ged Commuments\attachment 7\att7_2

-Desert Sew

Desert Water entire service DACs. The D

G and includesMHI).

Phase 1A wil

necessary to a

required to prer Quality Coank prohibitiorrently ffective on gional

nce that inual use of the Town ons of water impairment cial uses; tion, mination;

degradation waters, the king water within the

water essary to nt r

g septic that erm needs of the

4 IRWM Rged Com

unity Assistan2015irwm_dac_1of3_80615

wer Collect

District is thearea (which i

DAC determins all househol

ll address the

abate existing

rotect beneficontrol Plan (Bon on new an

Round 3 Gmmunity A

nce5.docx

tion System

e agency impincludes the Tnation for thelds where a m

following cri

g or prevent a

cial uses or mBasin Plan), wnd existing sep

Grant Assistance

m Program

plementing theTown of Yucce Hi-Desert Wmedian househ

itical water q

additional gro

meet a dischargwhich was adoptic systems w

e

Phase 1A

e Sewer Colleca Valley) is c

Water District hold income (

quality needs o

oundwater con

ge standard. opted on Maywithin the To

7-3

ection Systemconsidered a is based on D

(MHI) of less

of the DAC fo

ntamination

Colorado Rivy 19, 2011, imown of Yucca

m Program DAC; thus

DWR’s 2015 s than $48,875

for the Town

ver Basin mposed an

Valley with

5

MojAtta

Attac:\users\s

Le

SimilDACapproincluappli

This twencorrecriticsyste

As sesix (2of the($36,

1)

2)

3)

jave Regachmen

chment 7 – andrac\documents\mojave

eak Detecti

lar to the MojC Small Wateroximately 79

ude only the Sication.

Project is Phnty-six (26) smected via the Ccal need addreems to assure

een on Figure26) are considese 26 DAC s,656)). There

1 A2 A3 B4 B5 B6 C7 C8 C9 C10 D11 D12 G13 G14 H15 J16 L17 L18 N19 R20 S21 S22 T23 V24 W25 J26 D

) DAC Data SData: 2009

) An area of ~District Inco

) An area of ~Wallace on included as

gion Propt 7 – Disa

Disadvantage\grants\dwr round 3\attach

on Service

jave Region Cr Systems Phapercent of th

Small Water S

ase 1 of a twomall water sysCIP program.essed for the Dcontinued rel

e 4 (see Attachdered 100% Dsystems are cis a tremendo

Apple Valley FApple Valley VBar H Mutual BarLen MutuaBighorn-DeseCenter Water Chamisal MutCounty ServicCounty ServicDesert Dawn Desert SpringGordon AcresGreen Valley Hi Desert MutJubilee MutuaLucerne ValleLucerne VistaNavajo MutuaRancheritos MStoddard VallStrawberry LoThunderbird CValley of EnchWest End MutJoshua Basin Daggett CommSource: http://w– 2013.

~0.7 square miome Survey sub~1.7 sq mi is no6/23/15, it was100% DAC.

position 84advantag

ged Commuments\attachment 7\att7_2

es for Mojav

CII Turf Phasase 1 Programe Mojave Reg

Systems that a

o-phase Capitstems that are The plan is tDACs with thliability of the

hment 2), whDAC. Of the 2onsidered sevous amount o

Small WateFoothill CountView Mutual WWater Comp

al Water Comert View Wate

Company tual Water Coce Area 42 ce Area 70 WMutual Water

gs Mutual Wats Water CompMutual Watertual Water Coal Water Comey Mutual Wata Mutual Wateal Water ComMutual Water ey Mutual Wa

odge Mutual WCounty Waterhantment Muttual Water CoCounty Wate

munity Servicwww.water.ca.g

les (sq mi) is nbmission followot currently in ts decided that b

4 IRWM Rged Com

unity Assistan2015irwm_dac_1of3_80615

ve Region 1Systems P

se II Removalm will also segion qualifiesare 100% DA

tal Improveme 100% DAC.to apply for Phis Project is te minimum qu

hile there are f26 small wateverely disadvaof need for inf

r System ty Water DistWater Compaany

mpany r Agency

ompany

W4 r Company ter Companypany r Company ompany pany ter Companyer Company pany Company ater CompanyWater Compar District tual Water Coompany er District ces District gov/irwm/grants

not currently in wing this page.this DAC. This because there

Round 3 Gmmunity A

nce5.docx

100% DisadPhase 1 Pro

l Program, thirve the entires as disadvant

AC so a non-co

ment Plan (CIP. Phase 2 wilroposition 1 gthe necessaryuality and qu

forty (40) totaer systems incantaged (or hfrastructure in

rict any

y any

ompany

s/resources_da

this DAC. This

area contains were no reside

Grant Assistance

dvantaged rogram

is Leak Detece Mojave IRWtaged; howevonstruction pr

P), with Phasell take place wgrant monies

y infrastructuruantity of wate

al small watercluded in this

having a MHI nvestment in t

Service A(Sq Mi)1.1250.7490.2410.03051.9580.1490.3130.9801.0850.0980.3580.2472.2980.0341.0180.1580.0570.0851.1270.0270.0991.9640.2180.38096.55720.462

ac.cfm - US Ce

s area contains

no residencesences in this ar

e

Communit

ction ServicesWM Region. Aver for this Proroject can be

e 1 identifyinwhen the leakto fund Phas

re renovationser.

r systems in tLeak Detectiof less than 6this Region.

Area )

DAC(Sq1.0.0.0.

510.0.0.1.0.0.0.2.0.1.0.0.0.1.0.0.1.0.0.

95 18

ensus America

s 1 residence. S

and in email/prea, then this s

7-4

y (DAC) Sm

s for the MojaAs discussed oject, we hav“accepted” fo

g the leaks thks found in Phe 2 of this Pros to public wa

the Region, onion Project, o60% statewid

C Area q Mi)

P

124 749 241 030 .958 149 313 980 085 098 358 247 298 034 018 158 057 085 127 027 099 964 218 380 .888 .753 n Community S

See Joshua Ba

phone conversasmall water sys

mall Water

ave Region earlier,

ve decided to for this grant

hroughout the hase 1 are ogram. The ater supply

nly twenty-over one-half de MHI

Percent DAC1 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99%2 92%3 Survey 5-Year

asin Water

ation with Keithstem could be

h

JoshuaBasinWaterDistrictIncomeSurvey

1

1. What is the area to be surveyed?

a. The area to be surveyed is a small portion (one dwelling unit or house) inside the Joshua Basin Water District (JBWD) service area boundary (see figure below and on the next page of this income survey) that was not defined by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to be considered a disadvantaged community (DAC). All other areas in JBWD were deemed to be DAC per the DWR GIS maps and data available on their website. This one dwelling unit was the only house in the entire JBWD service area (96 square miles) that was NOT considered to be DAC. Because this one house wasn’t considered DAC, then the entire Water District would not be eligible to participate in the Leak Detection Services for Mojave Region 100% Disadvantaged Community (DAC) Small Water Systems Phase 1 Program – a grant application project that Mojave Water Agency (MWA) is applying for on behalf of the Mojave IRWM as part of the DWR Proposition 84 Round 3 Implementation Grant Application due August 7, 2015. For this Project, MWA is proposing to complete leak detection services for those Small Water Systems (for which JBWD would qualify) within the Mojave Region that are considered 100% DAC. The address of the one dwelling unit/home is 8919 LA CONTENTA RD., YUCCA VALLEY CA, 92284-4738. (See map of entire JBWD service area on the next page.)

2. What is the project associated with the survey?

a. The project that is associated with the income survey is Leak Detection Services for Mojave Region 100% Disadvantaged Community (DAC) Small Water System Phase 1 Program – a grant application project that Mojave Water Agency (MWA) is applying for via Proposition 84 Round 3. This project would include locating leaks throughout the entire JBWD system, as well as technical assistance and support.

3. Why is the survey being conducted?

a. The Census has apparently included this one residence and thus does not accurately reflect the overwhelming DAC nature of the community. Because Census income statistics are sample-based, they may be subject to error and this one property appears to be such a case.

JoshuaBasinWaterDistrictIncomeSurvey

3

4. What information will be collected?

a. We will use a standard form obtained from the DWR website for income surveys and a copy of the form will be included with this write-up. The questions and information to be collected is:

i. How many people are permanent members of your household?

ii. How many people in your household worked full-time in 2014? (fulltime means at least 25 hours per week for 50 weeks).

iii. What was your household income in 2014? (Please include gross wages and salaries, business/farm income, interest, dividends, social security, other retirement, supplemental, security income, welfare, disability, VA payments, unemployment, alimony, other.) If the exact amount is not known, please give your best estimate.

iv. How many people in your household are 65 or over?

v. How many people in your household are under 18?

5. Who will collect this data?

a. According to DWR, JBWD employee(s) are allowed to collect this data and we have asked the General Manager of JBWD, Curt Sauer, to complete the survey for us.

6. What Method will be used to collect the data?

a. The method used to collect the data is an in-person site visit by the General Manager of JBWD.

7. Who will analyze the data and prepare the Income Survey Report?

a. No data analysis was required for this Report. See the next page.

JoshuaBasinWaterDistrictIncomeSurvey

4

Results of Income Survey: Please see attached field visit report by the General Manager of JBWD regarding the one dwelling unit that was NOT included in the current DAC boundary for an explanation.

The one dwelling unit (8919 LA CONTENTA RD., YUCCA VALLEY CA, 92284-4738) that was surveyed turned out to be commercial property – a bed & breakfast lodge – and not residential. Therefore, since vacant, vacation and commercial parcels are all excluded from Income Surveys (those parcels are similarly excluded from the Census - ACS data), then all remaining properties in JBWD are already considered to be DAC and now JBWD can be considered 100% DAC.

The screen capture below is an email confirming this from Tanya Meeth, P.G. dated July 1, 2015.