Upload
jimmy
View
36
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
2D STRESS ANALYSIS USING CST NO MATRIC: A 136646UKM
Citation preview
Name: MOHD SHEREEN BIN ZAINUDDIN
Matric no: A136646
INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, the application of rubber bearing is really important to reduce vibration risk due to
earthquake or vibration from human activity. For bridge applications this rubber bearing is used
to protect structural elements from the effects of strong-ground motion. Rubber bearing with
steel reinforcement are mostly common rubber bearing are used in superstructure application.
For this analysis, CST software is used to determine the formation of the deformation of the
rubber block with and without steel laminated at the middle of the rubber block.
Before we proceed with the calculation by using CST, here are some information related with the
acronyms:
NN: Number of node
NE: Number of elements
NM: Number of different materials
NDIM: Number of coordinates per node (2D = 2 or 3D = 3)
NEN: N Number of node per elements
ND: Number of degree of freedom along which displacement is specified. (Boundary condition)
NL: Number of applied component loads (along degree of freedom)
NMPC: Number of Multipoint Constrains
Nu: Poissons ratio
CASE 1:
Rubber block without steel laminated deformation analysis.
Rubber block analysis:
Thickness: 300mm
Dimension: 100 mm X 80 mm
Material: Rubber.
Answer:
Node# X-Displ (mm) Y-Displ (mm)
1 -1.70077E-06 -3.70928E-06
2 6.03003E-07 -4.8504E-06
3 1.51156E-06 -4.37135E-06
4 -0.059250339 -0.16026537
5 0.031269896 -0.139690352
6 0.136115145 -0.238519185
7 -0.030993938 -0.375223348
8 0.074256736 -0.296143672
9 0.267747217 -0.508297224
Elem# SX SY Txy S1 S2 S3
1 -26.70966247 -53.42024646 -4.93746 -25.8262 -54.3037 -10.1447
2 0.857812273 -34.49246932 3.977442 1.299808 -34.9345 6.341018
3 -23.28067469 -46.5617128 2.605806 -22.9926 -46.8498 6.309005
4 -11.79373582 -65.52557143 4.754214 -11.3763 -65.943 5.017608
5 -11.68760037 -59.5832946 3.726368 -11.3994 -59.8715 4.422247
6 1.991293218 -38.11768335 8.854215 3.858931 -39.9853 11.91092
7 1.883179886 -38.17174002 -3.00635 2.107567 -38.3961 -4.26851
8 6.634455171 -64.12728202 -3.17423 6.776559 -64.2694 -2.56331
DOF# Reaction
1 197288.9441 N
2 430276.6238 N
3 -69948.29141 N
4 562646.7523 N
5 -175340.6527 N
6 507076.6238 N
Result:
Displacement of the node:
From the picture above, it is the form of deformation of the rubber block. The resultant force are
more toward to the right direction. The deformation happened at the entire portion of the
element.
CASE 2:
Steel laminated rubber block analysis:
Thickness: 300mm
Dimension: 100 mm X 80 mm
Material: Rubber and steel
Answer:
Node# X-Displ (mm) Y-Displ (mm)
1 -3.89101E-08 -1.12083E-07
2 1.50991E-08 -1.93563E-07
3 3.78997E-08 -1.34624E-07
4 0.002013544 -0.134005283
5 0.021987199 -0.120650501
6 0.041988278 -0.163685533
7 -0.000689064 -0.137619293
8 0.025582289 -0.123865518
9 0.050385789 -0.168204464
10 -0.021151996 -0.309906591
11 0.037200266 -0.229298178
12 0.203999529 -0.406731079
Elem# SX SY Txy S1 S2 S3
1 -25.52477999 -51.04958159 0.191764 -25.5233 -51.051 0.430423
2 -17.65470284 -43.29886792 2.984336 -17.312 -43.6416 6.551153
3 -22.98100492 -45.96201896 2.094021 -22.7918 -46.1513 5.164099
4 -25.84454997 -59.68953154 1.129878 -25.8069 -59.7272 1.909923
5 63.96764559 -53.08992242 -0.24347 63.96815 -53.0904 -0.11917
6 94.28056554 -36.01616334 48.8142 110.5394 -52.275 18.4217
7 66.71891879 -44.28465736 -38.5532 78.79522 -56.361 -17.3925
8 79.23122218 -66.60925688 -3.61752 79.3209 -66.6989 -1.42004
9 -25.81093374 -62.13040893 -1.03193 -25.7816 -62.1597 -1.62618
10 -4.521808037 -32.38452108 6.480368 -3.08834 -33.818 12.47308
11 -13.46814476 -36.85768945 -1.84946 -13.3228 -37.003 -4.49327
12 -0.953837837 -68.62738054 2.80102 -0.8381 -68.7431 2.366088
DOF# Reaction
1 132566.8625 N
2 381865.0992 N
3 -51442.50217 N
4 659469.8016 N
5 -129124.3603 N
6 458665.0992 N
The deformation of the rubber mostly happened at the top layer of the laminated rubber block.
DISCUSSION
1. The displacement of the nodes for case 1 (rubber block without steel laminated) are much
higher compared to the rubber block with steel laminated.
2. Besides that, the reaction forces for case 1 are higher compared to the steel laminated
rubber block.
3. Steel laminated rubber block give out minimum deformation and stabilize the shape of the
block, which is important to maintain the shape of the structure in application area.
4. The deformation of the rubber block without steel laminated give out major shape changing
when force being applied to its surface.
CONCLUSION
As conclusion, for steel laminated rubber block, the deformation happen mostly at the top of the
surface of the laminated area. But for the rubber block without steel laminated, we can see that,
the entire area of the surface undergoes serious deformation.