Upload
antjesteinmuller
View
161
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
part d - skin systems
Leif Estrada, Arch.Analysis 2010
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Pranay Mowji, Madrid Social Housing (Morphosis)
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Pranay Mowji, Madrid Social Housing (Morphosis)
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Pamela Pascual, Alessandra Marsh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Pamela Pascual, Alessandra Marsh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Pamela Pascual, Alessandra Marsh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Pamela Pascual, Alessandra Marsh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Pamela Pascual, Alessandra Marsh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Heidyeh Lavasani, Patio Housing (Neutelings)
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Vanessa Carvalho, Jeff Moody, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Vanessa Carvalho, Jeff Moody, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Vanessa Carvalho, Jeff Moody, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
HOUSING TACTICS
teaching
!"#$%$#&'(%'))'*+,+-.%/0123/%42154.%647869.%1/%:8-1.;.<%7-=64>-%7-.%6??/.7%:2<%7-.%/-1?712>%6?%[email protected]>/A%B2%7-1/%/7:>.C%7-.%/74<D%6?%7-.%/012%1/%?4=7-.=%@4/-.<%1276%7-.%127.=16=%862<17162/%6?%7-.%/@:8.C%12%7.=9/%6?%;1/4:E%@6=6/17D%:2<%E1>-7A
,"F%'GHI,"('HI(I,B+&%I)%,JBF%,&,+'K'G+'F,BIF%BF+I%BF+'(BI(
L(#BF%I)%IH'FBFL,%M'G+A%,JBFN
L(#BF%I)%IH'FBFL,%MBF+A%O(#HH'(N
P$I*J#L'HI(I,B+&%+Q(I"LQ%IH'FBFL,
,"F%(#&,
Module 1b/c: Spatial Analysis + Grain
!"#$%&'()#*(%+,&-%./%&'(
.012034(567898:3(:;0(<0=:141>(4::8:?@53A(BCD(:0(243E(:75(?=8:3(8=:0(0=5(8=:51F14:5@(;70G5(4=@(BHD(:0(<154:5(?=8I?5( 56J5185=<53( ;8:78=( 54<7( ?=8:*( ( -75( 3E8=(<154:53( 4=( 8115F?G41( J4::51=( :74:( @053( =0:( @83F?837(0=5( ?=8:( K102( 4=0:751( K102( :75( 56:51801L( ;78G5(J10@?<8=F(M4185@(8=:51801(<0=@8:80=3(420=F(:75(?=8:3*
UNFOLDED ELEVATION
TYPOLOGY STYDIES
SOUTH
11 TINU01 TINU9 TINU8 TINU7 TINU
UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6
SOUTH ELEVATION
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
(FRONT)
(FRONT)SOUTH ELEVATION
!"#$%&'#&
(%&)*+*,-#.&%-/
0'."*12%3&
!"'.4*5*63--"74*5*8/%&7
,-"#./*9:;'"3%$)*!"#$%&'#&7
<'7&*;-33)=-->4*(.3%?-"/%.
@2AA'"*BCCD
EF4CCC*@64*G*7&-"%'74*EE*8/%&7
6-"A-7.*EEGC1H*,'-/I4*!H*J=./
!"#$%&'())$&*(+,-,#!&*)$).#!/
Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
OFFSET / SHIFTBy o! setting the exterior envelop from the inner wrap-per, there’s a chance for a shift between the openings on both layers. Because of these shifts, variations are created between each unit. Through these studies, the rhythm, as well as the depth of porosity and light penetrations within the units proves the uniqueness of each unit. The struc-ture behind the panels, not only holds up the skin system, but also takes a role in the overall form.
!"#$"%&'()*)+"'#$,+-"#
#.,$/"%&'()*)+"'#$,+-"#
GRAIN OF OPENINGS (EXT. SKIN) GRAIN OF OPENINGS (INT. WRAPPER) BLOCKAGE SUN RAYSPOROSITY THROUGH OPENINGS
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
OFFSET / SHIFTBy o! setting the exterior envelop from the inner wrap-per, there’s a chance for a shift between the openings on both layers. Because of these shifts, variations are created between each unit. Through these studies, the rhythm, as well as the depth of porosity and light penetrations within the units proves the uniqueness of each unit. The struc-ture behind the panels, not only holds up the skin system, but also takes a role in the overall form.
!"#$"%&'()*)+"'#$,+-"#
#.,$/"%&'()*)+"'#$,+-"#
GRAIN OF OPENINGS (EXT. SKIN) GRAIN OF OPENINGS (INT. WRAPPER) BLOCKAGE SUN RAYSPOROSITY THROUGH OPENINGS
Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
WRAP AND DETACHThe panels within the skin system are arranged and coordinated with one another to form a continuous ! ow from the Western (street) to the Southern (landscape) facades, while leaving the other two eleva-tions to ! oat in a detatched manner. The main focus of the design is stressed on the “exposed” Western and Southern facades, as opposed to the implied ”back” Northern and Eastern facades.
SKIN EXPLORATIONThe skin is explored through a series of porosity studies starting from the initial solid/void relationship, to material porosity, to skin layer-ing. The skin system consists of an inner wrapper as well as a com-posite of two panel types that make up the exterior skin o" set from the inner wrapper.
!"#$%&'&("$%&)*+,*-$"-&!.$/0
1"-"!$,2&"3&45,*-$5#
1"-"!$,2&"3&45,*-$5#
6"41"!$,*&*#*(5,$"/
!"#$%&&'&("$%&)$//*-&7-511*-0
1"-"!$,2&!,8%2&)*+,*-$"-&!.$/0
Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
TYPOLOGYSeeing that there are a couple of similar shapes within the di! er-ent skin panels, they are now isolated by type to " nd any pattern of their locations. But after examining the outcome, there seems to be no pattern as to when and where each panel type is placed and rotated.
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
TYPOLOGYSeeing that there are a couple of similar shapes within the di! er-ent skin panels, they are now isolated by type to " nd any pattern of their locations. But after examining the outcome, there seems to be no pattern as to when and where each panel type is placed and rotated.
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
REVISITING GRAINAside from the spatial conditions that make up the grain within the project, the grain of the skin system begins to suggest a dif-ferent understanding of the project. By separating the grain by di-rectionality as well as material, the rhythm generated by each type is revealed. With a larger portion of skin dominated by the orange panels, the red became responsible for the detailed moves. The rhythm of the skin, both vertically and horizontally as a whole is demonstrated through the composite grain diagram.
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
REVISITING GRAINAside from the spatial conditions that make up the grain within the project, the grain of the skin system begins to suggest a dif-ferent understanding of the project. By separating the grain by di-rectionality as well as material, the rhythm generated by each type is revealed. With a larger portion of skin dominated by the orange panels, the red became responsible for the detailed moves. The rhythm of the skin, both vertically and horizontally as a whole is demonstrated through the composite grain diagram.
Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
GRAIN / VOIDGrain can old inform the “movement” of the “solid.” One hypothesis was the the panels moved in accordance to provide more room for the openings. But when the voids and the grains are juxtaposed against each other, there is only a sense of movement and the grains do not aggressively serve as a “railing” system.
POINT OF CONTACTAs the skin is made up of many small panels that are more in re-lation to each unit, an overall understanding of the form is also needed --looking at how the skin meets the sky and ground. The pushing further within the panel aggregation to see when and where the window openings on the interior wrapper meet exactly edge-to-edge with the panels.
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
GRAIN / VOIDGrain can old inform the “movement” of the “solid.” One hypothesis was the the panels moved in accordance to provide more room for the openings. But when the voids and the grains are juxtaposed against each other, there is only a sense of movement and the grains do not aggressively serve as a “railing” system.
POINT OF CONTACTAs the skin is made up of many small panels that are more in re-lation to each unit, an overall understanding of the form is also needed --looking at how the skin meets the sky and ground. The pushing further within the panel aggregation to see when and where the window openings on the interior wrapper meet exactly edge-to-edge with the panels.
Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
SPECIFIC POROSITYFollowing upon the previous Unit Identity diagram, each unit then can be analyzed through the level of porosity it receives due to the nature of the varying skin. Each unit di! ers in terms of light quality, visual array, and privacy, allowing the potential residents a customized choice.
UNIT 1 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11
UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6
SOUTH ELEVATION(FRONT)
(REAR)NORTH ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION(REAR)
(FRONT)SOUTH ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATIO
N EAST
ELE
VATI
ON
Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Architect
City / Location
Year Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects
West Hollywood, California
Summer 2009
16,000 SF, 4 stories, 11 Units
Formosa 1140B. Leong, A. Iwan
UNIT IDENTITYThe most signi! cant concept of the design lies on the exterior facade rather than within the unit con! gurations. While the units are very similar to one another, the quality of the skin allows for a di" erentiation, or identity for each unit.
UNIT 1 UNIT 7 UNIT 8 UNIT 9 UNIT 10 UNIT 11
UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6
SOUTH ELEVATION(FRONT)
(REAR)NORTH ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION(REAR)
(FRONT)SOUTH ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATIO
N EAST
ELE
VATI
ON
Anesta Iwan, Bobby Leung, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
HOUSING TACTICS
teaching
!"#$%$#&'(%'))'*+,+-.%/0123/%42154.%647869.%1/%:8-1.;.<%7-=64>-%7-.%6??/.7%:2<%7-.%/-1?712>%6?%[email protected]>/A%B2%7-1/%/7:>.C%7-.%/74<D%6?%7-.%/012%1/%?4=7-.=%@4/-.<%1276%7-.%127.=16=%862<17162/%6?%7-.%/@:8.C%12%7.=9/%6?%;1/4:E%@6=6/17D%:2<%E1>-7A
,"F%'GHI,"('HI(I,B+&%I)%,JBF%,&,+'K'G+'F,BIF%BF+I%BF+'(BI(
L(#BF%I)%IH'FBFL,%M'G+A%,JBFN
L(#BF%I)%IH'FBFL,%MBF+A%O(#HH'(N
P$I*J#L'HI(I,B+&%+Q(I"LQ%IH'FBFL,
,"F%(#&,
Module 1b/c: Spatial Analysis + Grain
!"#$%&'()#*(%+,&-%./%&'(
.012034(567898:3(:;0(<0=:141>(4::8:?@53A(BCD(:0(243E(:75(?=8:3(8=:0(0=5(8=:51F14:5@(;70G5(4=@(BHD(:0(<154:5(?=8I?5( 56J5185=<53( ;8:78=( 54<7( ?=8:*( ( -75( 3E8=(<154:53( 4=( 8115F?G41( J4::51=( :74:( @053( =0:( @83F?837(0=5( ?=8:( K102( 4=0:751( K102( :75( 56:51801L( ;78G5(J10@?<8=F(M4185@(8=:51801(<0=@8:80=3(420=F(:75(?=8:3*
UNFOLDED ELEVATION
TYPOLOGY STYDIES
SOUTH
11 TINU01 TINU9 TINU8 TINU7 TINU
UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6
SOUTH ELEVATION
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
(FRONT)
(FRONT)SOUTH ELEVATION
!"#$%&'#&
(%&)*+*,-#.&%-/
0'."*12%3&
!"'.4*5*63--"74*5*8/%&7
,-"#./*9:;'"3%$)*!"#$%&'#&7
<'7&*;-33)=-->4*(.3%?-"/%.
@2AA'"*BCCD
EF4CCC*@64*G*7&-"%'74*EE*8/%&7
6-"A-7.*EEGC1H*,'-/I4*!H*J=./
!"#$%&'())$&*(+,-,#!&*)$).#!/
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Jason Vereschak, Rania Odeh, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Francis Silagon, David Gastaneta, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Francis Silagon, David Gastaneta, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Francis Silagon, David Gastaneta, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Francis Silagon, David Gastaneta, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Francis Silagon, David Gastaneta, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Amanda Cross, Claudine Chiongbian, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Amanda Cross, Claudine Chiongbian, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Amanda Cross, Claudine Chiongbian, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Colin Deckner, Mateen Mortazavi, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Module 01 d 11
Architect
City / Location
Year Designed / Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Herzog and de Meuron
Tribeca / Location Here
2008 / In Progress
425,000 sf, 57 Floors, 145 UnitsColin Deckner, Mateen Mortazavi, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
North
East
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
2 Units
3 Units
4 Units
Public/Amenity
1 Unit
West
South
Negative from Highest & Lowest PointW
ITH
BAL
CON
IES
NO
BAL
CON
IES
By taking each elevation of 56 Leonard Street, the variance between !oors has become aparent. Making a simple bar diagram made it clear to see exactly how much each !oor deviates from one another. The negative of each edge of each elevation is also key because it shows the space created between the building envelope and the building edge.
Module 1D
Architect
City / Location
Year Designed / Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Herzog&DeMueron
Tribeca, NYC
2008/In Progress
425,000 sqft, 58 Floors, 145 Units
North
East
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
2 Units
3 Units
4 Units
Public/Amenity
1 Unit
West
South
Negative from Highest & Lowest PointW
ITH
BAL
CON
IES
NO
BAL
CON
IES
By taking each elevation of 56 Leonard Street, the variance between !oors has become aparent. Making a simple bar diagram made it clear to see exactly how much each !oor deviates from one another. The negative of each edge of each elevation is also key because it shows the space created between the building envelope and the building edge.
Mateem M & Colin D.Mateen M & Colin D.
North
East
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
2 Units
3 Units
4 Units
Public/Amenity
1 Unit
West
South
Negative from Highest & Lowest PointW
ITH
BAL
CON
IES
NO
BAL
CON
IES
By taking each elevation of 56 Leonard Street, the variance between !oors has become aparent. Making a simple bar diagram made it clear to see exactly how much each !oor deviates from one another. The negative of each edge of each elevation is also key because it shows the space created between the building envelope and the building edge.
Mateem M & Colin D.Mateen M & Colin D.
Colin Deckner, Mateen Mortazavi, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
South
West
East
North
With Balconies
SouthWestEastNorth
WestEastNorth
South
Without Balconies
With Balconies
Composite of Both
Without Balconies
2 Units3 Units
4 Units
Public/Amenity
1 Unit
By creating a plan without detail and only dimensions, it has become coherent how the column sizes vary and align with each other. The elevator and stairs stay constant, but the doorway sizes also vary in size depending on the use.
Mateem M & Colin D.Mateen M & Colin D.
South
West
East
North
With Balconies
SouthWestEastNorth
WestEastNorth
South
Without Balconies
With Balconies
Composite of Both
Without Balconies
2 Units3 Units
4 Units
Public/Amenity
1 Unit
By creating a plan without detail and only dimensions, it has become coherent how the column sizes vary and align with each other. The elevator and stairs stay constant, but the doorway sizes also vary in size depending on the use.
Module 1D
Architect
City / Location
Year Designed / Built
Area, # Floors, # Units
Herzog&DeMueron
Tribeca, NYC
2008/In Progress
425,000 sqft, 58 Floors, 145 Units
Colin Deckner, Mateen Mortazavi, Arch.Analysis 2011
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Gustavo DeLeon, WoZoCo (MVRDV)
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
Chanelle Hurst, Yerba Buena Lofts (Saitowitz)
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
John Improgo, Nemausus (Nouvel)
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
John Improgo, Nemausus (Nouvel)
CCA architectural analysis antje steinmuller
John Improgo, Nemausus (Nouvel)