57
Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar 1

Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

1

Module 3AVATAR Teams:

Aligning Courses ThroughCritical Conversations

http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Page 2: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

This Module Discusses…

• College and Career Readiness Standards:Content and Cross-Disciplinary Standards

• Texas University Common Core Curriculum • Texas Academic Course Guide Manual (ACGM)• Reference Course Profiles:

Definition, Examples, Purpose, and Process• Assessments at Secondary and Postsecondary Levels

2

Page 3: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

The AVATAR Process is built on Critical Conversations between secondary and postsecondary

leaders and educators. The conversation is structured and

facilitated in order to achieve course vertical alignment in content and

cross-disciplinary skills.

3

Page 4: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

4

Critical Conversations

Student Success Assessments

Dual Credit, Early College High Schools

Student Support Services

Educational Policies and Practices

Classroom Instruction, Textbooks, Grading, etc.

Discipline Specific CourseCurriculum

Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills

Impact of Developmental Education and Texas Success Initiative Dual Credit, Early College High Schools

Student Support Services

Educational Policies and Practices

Classroom Instruction, Textbooks Grading, etc.

Discipline Reference Course Profiles

College & Career Readiness Standards

Secondary Post-SecondaryGraduate College/Career Ready Graduate Career Ready

Page 5: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

5http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Sdfsdfsdfsdfssdfsdfsdfsdf

Critical Conversations• AVATAR’s Critical Conversations may begin at

any place on the pyramid.

• Each region may move along the pyramid in different ways.

• A good place to start is building foundational knowledge of the College and Career Readiness Standards and understanding their alignment with the TEKS.

CCRS

Page 6: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

6http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Building a Common Foundation for College and Career Readiness

Agree on:

1. A conceptual framework

2. Understandings of terms and ideas

Sdfsdfsdfsdfssdfsdfsdfsdf

Page 7: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

7http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Let’s Review Together: College and Career Readiness Standards

Link:http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=EADF962E-0E3E-DA80-BAAD2496062F3CD8

Page 8: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

8http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

T E X A S C C R S• CCRS mandated by House Bill 1 (HB1)

• Texas Education Agency (TEA) and Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) convened vertical teams to develop the standards

• There is strong alignment between the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills and the CCRS

• Sponsored by both Texas Education Agency (TEA) and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB)

College and Career Readiness Standards

April 2008Sent to Commissioner of Education

and State Board of Education for incorporation to the TEKS

October 2007Presented to THECB

October to December 2007Public Comment Period

January 2008Adopted by THECB

T I M E L I N E

Source: Texas College & Career Readiness Center, 2012

February-May 2012Convening of committees to

establish, approve, and implement STAAR performance standards

May 2006HB1 mandating development of

standards

2008-2011Validation study by EPIC to compare CCRS to general education and technical

education courses

May 2014Review of STAAR

performancestandards

Page 9: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

9http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Texas Essential Knowledge and SkillsSec. 28.001. PURPOSE. It is the intent of the legislature that the essential knowledge and skills developed by the State Board of Education under this subchapter shall require all students to demonstrate the knowledge and skills necessary to read, write, compute, problem solve, think critically, apply technology, and communicate across all subject areas. The essential knowledge and skills shall also prepare and enable all students to continue to learn in postsecondary educational, training, or employment settings. 74th Legislative Session (1995)

Page 10: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

10http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

1. What are the TEKS?They are state-mandated learning standards for students from elementary through high school in the state of Texas; what students should and be able to do in each subject area. 2. Why were the TEKS created?Prior to the creation of the TEKS, Essential Elements were used. More specific and clear guidelines were needed so teachers are knowledgeable about what to teach and assess. 3. Who developed the TEKS?Groups of teachers, administrators, parents, business people, and members of the general public made up the subject-specific TEKS writing teams.

Source: Mathematics & Science TEKS Toolkit, Charles A. Dana Center at University of Texas http://www.utdanacenter.org/

Page 11: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

11http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

• Represent a full range of knowledge and skills that students need to succeed in college and careers.

• Emphasize the content of courses. • Introduce disciplinary structures to familiarize

students with key concepts and content in each of the core academic areas.

• Include a set of cross-disciplinary standards that apply to specific and all content courses.

T E X A S C C R SCollege and Career Readiness

Standards

Source: Texas College & Career Readiness Center, 2012

Page 12: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

12http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

• The CCRS differ from high school graduation standards by emphasizing content and cross-disciplinary standards to determine readiness instead of mastery of skills and knowledge.

• The content standards stimulate students’ deeper levels of thinking and concentrate on foundational skills in reading, writing, research, data use, and technology.

• The cross-disciplinary standards focus on intellectual curiosity, problem solving, academic behaviors, work habits, and academic integrity.

College and Career Readiness Standards

T E X A S C C R S

Source: Texas College & Career Readiness Standards, Introduction

Page 13: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

13http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

T E X A S C C R SCollege and Career Readiness

Standards

Key Content:Key Ideas of a Discipline that Repeat as Themes throughout the Curriculum

Organizing Components:Conceptual Topics & Knowledge Expectations

Performance Expectations:General Goals & Performance Indicators

3There are three levels for the

Content Area and Cross-Disciplinary Standards

Source: Texas College & Career Readiness Center, 2012

The Multi level Framework

Page 14: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

14http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

T E X A S C C R SCollege and Career Readiness

StandardsMulti level Framework Example:

English Language Arts StandardsI. Writing

A. Compose a variety of texts that demonstrateclear focus, the logical development ofideas in well-organized paragraphs, and theuse of appropriate language that advancesthe author’s purpose.

1. Determine effective approaches, forms,and rhetorical techniques that demonstrateunderstanding of the writer’s purpose andaudience.

Page 15: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

15http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

T E X A S C C R SCollege and Career Readiness

Standards

Source: Conley, D. T. (2007). Redefining college readiness. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.epiconline.org

Page 16: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

16http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Cross-Discipl inary StandardsS k i l l s R e q u i r e d

Key Cognitive Skills Foundational SkillsIntellectual Curiosity Reading Across the Curriculum Reasoning Writing Across the Curriculum

Problem Solving Research Across the Curriculum

Academic Behaviors Use of Data

Work Habits TechnologyAcademic Integrity

T E X A S C C R SCollege and Career Readiness

Standards

Source: Texas College & Career Readiness Center, 2012

Page 17: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

17http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

What is College and Career Readiness?

• College and career readiness can be defined as the level of preparation necessary for students to:– enroll and succeed, without remediation, in entry-

level, college credit bearing, general education courses.

– apply basic knowledge and skills, such as critical thinking and problem solving, to concrete situations in order to function in the postsecondary setting and/or workplace.

Source: Association for Career and Technical Education & David Conley “Redefining College Readiness”, as cited in Texas College & Career Readiness Center, 2012)

Page 18: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

18http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Texas University Common Core Curriculum

• Why Change It?– The curriculum needs to reflect current and future demands

of students at the college level and in the workplace.– It represents a change from the belief of core as “basics” or

just needed courses to a set of essential college level skills and knowledge to be learned in a variety of disciplines.

• Purpose:– “Through the core curriculum, students will gain a

foundation of knowledge of human cultures and the physical and natural worlds; develop principles of personal and social responsibility for living in a diverse world, and advance intellectual and practical skills that are essential for all learning” (THECB, 2011)

Source: The Core Curriculum: A Focus on 21st Competencies Webinar (04/11/2012) and Report to UEACAvailable at: http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=6AB82E4B-C31F-E344-C78E3688524B44FBand www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=6EA8957A-D7E2-C369-67F42EC166BC88FC

Page 19: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

19http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

What will the Texas Common Core Curriculum Achieve?

Six Core Objectives• Critical Thinking Skills: to include creative thinking, innovation, inquiry, and analysis,

evaluation, and synthesis of information

• Communication Skills: to include effective development, interpretation and expression of ideas through written, oral, and visual communication

• Empirical & Quantitative Skills: to include the manipulation and analysis of numerical data or observable facts resulting in informed conclusions

• Teamwork: to include the ability to consider different points of view and to work effectively with others to support a shared purpose or goal

• Personal Responsibility: to include the ability to connect choices, actions, and consequences to ethical decision-making

• Social Responsibility: to include intercultural competence, knowledge of civic responsibility, and the ability to engage effectively in regional, national , and global communities

Source: The Core Curriculum: A Focus on 21st Competencies Webinar (04/11/2012)Available at: http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=6AB82E4B-C31F-E344-C78E3688524B44FB

Page 20: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

20

Connecti ons: New Common Core Curriculum &

Cross-Disciplinary CCRS

Cross-Disciplinary CCRS Skills• Key Cognitive Skills: intellectual

curiosity, reasoning, problem solving, academic behaviors, work habits, academic integrity

• Foundational Skills: reading across the curriculum, writing across the curriculum, research across the curriculum, use of data, technology

Texas Common Core Objectives• Critical Thinking Skills• Communication Skills• Empirical & Quantitative Skills• Teamwork• Personal Responsibility• Social Responsibility

What do you notice in the two lists?

Page 21: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

21http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

How Is the University Common Core Curriculum Structured?

Eight Foundational Component Areas 1) Communication

2) Mathematics

3) Life and Physical Sciences

4) Language, Philosophy, & Culture

5) Creative Arts

6) American History

7) Government/Political Science

8) Social/Behavioral Science Source: The Core Curriculum: A Focus on 21st Competencies Webinar (04/11/2012)Available at: http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=6AB82E4B-C31F-E344-C78E3688524B44FB

Page 22: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

22

Connecti ons: Texas Common Core Component &

Cross-Disciplinary CCRS Content Areas

CCRS Content Areas• English/Language Arts• Social Sciences• Mathematics• Science

University Core Component Areas

• Communication• Mathematics• Life & Physical Sciences• Language, Philosophy, &

Culture• Creative Arts• American History• Government/Political Science• Social & Behavioral Sciences

What do you notice in the two lists?

Page 23: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

23http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Mapping Texas Core Curriculum Objectives to Component Areas

Foundational Component Area

Critical Thinking

Communication Skills

Empirical & Quantitative Skills

Teamwork Social Responsibility

Personal Responsibility

Communication6 SCH

X X OPTIONAL X OPTIONAL X

Mathematics3 SCH

X X X OPTIONAL OPTIONAL OPTIONAL

Life & Physical Sciences6 SCH

X X X X OPTIONAL OPTIONAL

Language, Philosophy, & Culture 3 SCH

X X OPTIONAL OPTIONAL X X

Creative Arts3 SCH

X X OPTIONAL X X OPTIONAL

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (2011) Revising the State Core Curriculum: A Focus on 21st Century Competencies. Retrieved from: www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=6EA8957A-D7E2-C369-67F42EC166BC88FC

Page 24: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

24http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Mapping Texas Core Curriculum Objectives to Component Areas

Foundational Component Area

Critical Thinking

Communication Skills

Empirical & Quantitative Skills

Teamwork Social Responsibility

Personal Responsibility

American History6 SCH

X X OPTIONAL OPTIONAL X X

Government/Political Science6 SCH

X X OPTIONAL OPTIONAL X X

Social/BehavioralScience3 SCH

X X X OPTIONAL X OPTIONAL

Component AreaOption6 SCH

OPTIONAL OPTIONAL OPTIONAL OPTIONAL OPTIONAL OPTIONAL

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (2011) Revising the State Core Curriculum: A Focus on 21st Century Competencies. Retrieved from: www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=6EA8957A-D7E2-C369-67F42EC166BC88FC

Page 25: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

25http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Texas Academic Course Guide Manual(ACGM)

• What is it?– official list of Texas approved courses for general

academic transfer– http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/acgm

• How is it organized?– alphabetic and with number by Texas Common Course

Numbering System (TCCNS)– Title, common course prefix, course number,

description, approval number, CIP area, maximum semester credit hours per student, maximum course contact hours, and learning outcomes

Source: Lower Division Academic course Guide Manual (2012)Retrieved from: http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/acgm

Page 26: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

26http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

ACGM: Example EntryCHEM 1112 General Chemistry II (Lab) Basic laboratory experiments supporting theoretical principles presented in CHEM 1312; introduction of the scientific method, experimental design, chemical instrumentation, data collection and analysis, and preparation of laboratory reports. Co-requisite: CHEM 1312—General Chemistry II Approval Number ...................................................................................... 40.0501.56 03 CIP Area .............................................................................................. Physical Sciences maximum SCH per student ........................................................................................... 1 maximum SCH per course ............................................................................................ 1 maximum contact hours per course ............................................................................. 48

Learning Outcomes Upon successful completion of this course, students will: 1. Use basic apparatus and apply experimental methodologies used in the chemistry laboratory. 2. Demonstrate safe and proper handling of laboratory equipment and chemicals. 3. Conduct basic laboratory experiments with proper laboratory techniques. 4. Make careful and accurate experimental observations. 5. Relate physical observations and measurements to theoretical principles. 6. Interpret laboratory results and experimental data, and reach logical conclusions. 7. Record experimental work completely and accurately in laboratory notebooks and communicate experimental results clearly in written reports. 8. Design fundamental experiments involving principles of chemistry and chemical instrumentation. 9. Identify appropriate sources of information for conducting laboratory experiments involving principles of chemistry.

Source: Lower Division Academic Course Guide Manual (2012)Retrieved from: www.thecb.state.tx.us/AAR/UndergraduateEd/WorkforceEd/acgm.htm - 4k - 2012-02-14

Page 27: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

27http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Reference Course Profi les

Why are they needed?

What is their purpose?

What are they?

How do we create them?

Page 28: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

28

Let’s Review Why Vertical Alignment is Needed.

Page 29: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

29http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

22.5% of those entering a 4-year college enrolled in remediation.

51% of those entering a 2-year college enrolled in remediation. Of those students…30% completed the remediation14.3% completed the remediation and associated college-level courses in 2 years5.8% graduated within three years

Of those students…49.2% completed the remediation32.1% completed the remediation and associated college-level courses in 2 years29.6% graduated within six years

Source: Complete College America/Alliance of the States 2011 Texas State Remediation Report Retrieved from: http://www.completecollege.org/state_data/

Reducing the Need for Developmental Education

Through Course Vertical Alignment

Page 30: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

30

Students in 2 year IHEs who return to campus

Students in 4 year IHES who return to campus

100% 100%

63.80%

87.50%

48.20%

80.40%73.40%

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4Source: Complete College America/Alliance of the States 2011 Texas ReportRetrieved from: http://www.completecollege.org/state_data/

Improving Retention Rates Through Course Vertical Alignment

Page 31: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

What is the Impact of Vertical Alignment?

• Students are better prepared for their postsecondary courses.

• Students will spend less time taking developmental education.

• More students will graduate in a shorter period of time.

31

Page 32: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

32http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Student Achievement Is a Product of Rigor and Relevance.

Rigorous and Relevant Standards

Rigorous and Relevant Curriculum

Rigorous and RelevantAssessment

Rigorous and Relevant Instruction

Student Achievement

Source: Daggett, W. R. (2005) Achieving Academic Excellence through Rigor and Relevance. International Center for Leadership Education. Retrieved from: http://www.leadered.com/pdf/academic_excellence.pdf

Page 33: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

33http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Focused on 21st Century Competencies Where do we start?

Communication Skills

Teamwork

Social Responsibility

Personal Responsibility

Critical Thinking Skills

Empirical & Quantitative

Skills

Page 34: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

34http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Which listed competency is your first priority?

When and where do you address this priority?

Is your first priority the same as it would have been 5, 10,

15 years ago?

Competencies Group Discussion

Page 35: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

35http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Reference Course Profile: What is it?• According to the THECB, a reference course profile is a

composite course document that includes:– a comprehensive syllabus– a list of prerequisite knowledge and relevant CCR Standards – a list of learning outcomes – a schedule of lessons with attached sample assignments and

assessments

• Reference course profiles should share student and faculty expectations and serve as a resource for alignment.

http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=EF10502B-0887-897E-C10685432675A18C

THECB 09/2009THECB PowerPoint: College and Career Readiness Regional Round-up (2009)Retrieved from: www.uh.edu/wtsc_apps/thecb-reg/docs/Reference-Course-Profiles-09.14.09.ppt

Page 36: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

36http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Reference Course Profi lesThree Examples:

• AVATAR Pilot Project Examples

• THECB & Educational Policy Improvement Center Collaboration Examples

• C.O.R.E Program Examples

Page 37: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

37http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

AVATAR Pilot Project RCPs are available at:http://

www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar/files/pilot-testing/reference-course-profiles

CHEM 1111 (General Chemistry I Lab)CHEM 1112 (General Chemistry II Lab)

CHEM 1311 (General Chemistry I)CHEM 1312 (General Chemistry II)

ENGL 1301 (Composition I)ENGL 1302 (Composition II)

MATH 1312 (College Algebra)

AVATAR Course Profi les (RCP)

Page 38: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

38http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

dfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfs

Reference Course ProfilesThe Educational Policy Improvement Center Validation Study I

Link to the Study:http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/files/dmfile/TXValidationStudy1.pdf

Link to Reference Course Profiles:www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=F6192F5F-E60E-6222-9866CF650412C31A

Page 39: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

39http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

dfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfs

Reference Course ProfilesA Reference Course Profile Example from the Abilene Region

McMurry University, Hardin Simmons University, and Cisco College

Partnership

In Partnership Created:English 1301: Composition I

Regional Reference Course Packet

C.O.R.E. Program:http://www.cisco.edu/s/926/index.aspx?pgid=550&gid=1

RCP Sample:http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar/files/resources/training-module-resources

Page 40: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

40http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

AVATAR Course Profiles: What to Include?

• ACGM* and Institution’s Course Description• Hours of Credit• Prerequisites & Co-requisites• Prior Knowledge & Expectations Related CCRS• Student Learning Outcomes• Course Policies, Expectations, & Practices• Course Assignments & Assessments Descriptions• Grading Practices (grading rubrics)• Course Texts & Required Materials• Methods of Instruction• Class Schedule• Student, Class, & Campus Learning Resources• Sample Exams, Assignments, & Schedules • Instructor Information

*ACGM: Academic Course Guide Manual

Page 41: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

41http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatarDfgdfgdfgdfgSdgsfgdfgdfgdfgdfgsdfsdfsdfs

Writing Student Learning Outcomes

Type of Learning

Examples of Action Verbs

Knowledge – to recall or remember facts without necessarily understanding them

identify, articulate, define, indicate, name, order, relate, recall, reproduce, list, tell, select, group, match, describe, identify, show, label, tabulate, quote, locate, outline

Comprehension – to understand and interpret learned information

classify, describe, explain, express, interpret, contrast, associate, differentiate, extend, translate, restate, change, reword, convert

Application – to put ideas and concepts to work in solving problems

apply, compute, give examples, investigate, experiment, solve, choose, predict, translate, employ, operate, schedule, develop, demonstrate, use/utilize, manipulate

Analysis – to break information into its components to see interrelationships

analyze, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate, distinguish, interpret, simplify, inspect

Synthesis – to use creativity to compose and design something original

arrange, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, combine, compile, develop, produce, generate, structure, reorganize, design, formulate, manage, organize, plan, prepare, set up

Evaluation – to decide, judge, or select based on established criteria and rationale

appraise, assess, criticize, defend, predict, prioritize, determine, rate, support, evaluate, convince, conclude, compare, summarize

Remember:• Student learning outcomes describe what students are able to demonstrate in terms of

knowledge, skills, and attitudes upon completion of a program• Focus on student behavior and use simple, specific action verbs to describe what students are

expected to demonstrate upon completion of a course.

Source: www.thecb.state.tx.us/AAR/UndergraduateEd/WorkforceEd/wecm2000/WritingOutcomes.doc - 2009-05-11

Page 42: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

42http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Verb Wheel Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy

Domain

Verbs

Products

Writing Student Learning Outcomes

Retrieved from: https://sites.google.com/site/bloomstaxonomy2/verb-wheel

Page 43: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

43http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Work Groups: In subject specific groups, discuss your course

outcomes, expectations, policies, assignments, grading practices, assessments, etc.

Explore in groups:– similarities and differences, – alignment to TEKS and CCRS (content and cross-disciplinary standards),– various learning activities to teach similar or connected concepts, and– expectations of students

Page 44: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

44

Let’s Review Relevant Assessments and Their Role

in Course Alignment.

Page 45: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

45http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

STANDARDS INSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT

CONNECTIONS

Standards require a change in both teaching and assessment. Standards and assessment are

intertwined and need to be integral parts of the curriculum and the program of instruction.

Steiner, J. (1998). Why have a standards-based curriculum and what are the implications for the teaching-learning-assessment process? Retrieved from: http://www.etni.org.il/red/etninews/issue4/whystandard.html

Page 46: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

46http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

AssessmentIn a standards-based curriculum, assessment is

viewed not only as a final product (summative), but also as a continual process (formative) that provides

pupil performance data to teachers and students regarding their progress towards achieving the

standards.Therefore, it is necessary to move beyond testing

methods which concentrate on memory, and develop those which measure understanding and application

(Genesee, et.al., 1998; Winters, 1995).

Genesee, F. Gottlieb, M. Katz, A. Malone, M. Managing the assessment process. (1998). Virginia: TESOLWinters, R.E. (1995). National Standards in Education: How we should arrive at them, why we should arrive at them and why we have not arrived at them yet. The Claremont Graduate School. Retrieved from: http://www.etni.org.il/red/etninews/issue4/whystandard.html

Page 47: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

47http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

What are the Key Assessments?

I. Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS)

II. State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR)

a. Grades 3-8b. End of Course (EOC)

III. Texas Success Initiative (TSI)

Page 48: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

48http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

STAAR High School

Algebra IAlgebra IIGeometryBiologyChemistryPhysics

English IEnglish IIEnglish IIIWorld GeographyWorld HistoryUnited States History

STAAR End-of-Course Beginning with Freshman Class of 2011

Page 49: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

49http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Graduation Requirements

Source: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=2147497744&libID=2147497741

State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness

STAAR

Level 2:SatisfactoryAcademic

Performance

Level 3:AdvancedAcademic

Performance

Level 1:Unsatisfactory

Academic Performance

Minimum Score

Minimum High School Program:

Must meet the minimum cumulative score requirement

in each of the four core content areas.

Recommended High School Program:

In addition to the previous, must achieve level 2 for Algebra II and English III.

Distinguished AchievementHigh School Program:

In addition to the minimum, must achieve level 3 for

Algebra II and English III.

Page 50: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

50http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

What is the TSI?

• Texas Success Initiative (TSI) requires all students enrolling in public colleges and universities to take an approved test to demonstrate readiness for college-level work, unless otherwise exempt.

• Currently approved tests include: ACCUPLACER, ASSET, COMPASS, AND THEA–Minimum state standards are set for each test, yet

institutions may set higher standards and/or require additional departmental placement tests

Source: The Tipping Point in Developmental Education (McCoy & Mejia) retrieved from: http://www.mheducation.com/uar/Developmental_Ed_White_Paper.pdf

Page 51: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

51http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Upcoming TSI ChangesTexas Education CodeChapter 4, Subchapter C, Section 453.3Assessment--the use of a Board-approved instrument to determine the academic skills of each entering undergraduate student and the student's readiness to enroll in freshman-level academic coursework.

What does this mean?• The Commissioner will recommend a uniform performance

standard for college readiness, placement in Developmental Education or Adult Basic Education.

• With the one test, there will be one cutoff score that determines college readiness to be in place by Fall 2013.

• Institutions may not set a higher standard.

Page 52: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

52http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

The Connection:STAAR and TSI Implementation

Page 53: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

53http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Other Considerations in College and Career Readiness…

• Advanced Placement (AP) & International Baccalaureate (IB) programs – Many more participating in courses– Performance still trailing number of attempts

• Dual Credit– High rates of participation– Quality and rigor difficult to monitor

• Early College High Schools– Proficiency and graduation rates higher than local high schools – Stronger student performance linked to ECHSs located on college

campuses– Not all college credits earned transfer to college by institution upon

graduation from a ECHSSource: Six Years and Counting: The ECHSI Mature, 2009http://www.earlycolleges.org/publications.html#earlycollege:researchandevaluations

Page 54: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

54http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Critical Questions• How does one change teachers’ beliefs about

the teaching-learning-assessment process? • How can we help teachers deal with change

regarding their pedagogical values and beliefs and the development of new methodological skills?

• What are the ways that we can help educators at all levels understand the standards and the implications for their teaching?

Page 55: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

55http://www.ntp16.notlb.com/avatar

Critical Conversations and Intentional Interventions: An Ongoing Process

Vertical Alignment and Student Success Resources

• Texas Faculty Collaborativeshttp://www.txfacultycollaboratives.org/

• Texas College and Career Readiness Programhttp://www.txccrs.org/index.html

• Pathways https://share.thecb.state.tx.us/sites/Pathways/default.aspx

• Texas State University’s Correlated Lesson Plans http://www.cose.txstate.edu/mathematics/mixitup/Correlated-Lesson-Plans.html

Page 56: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

56

Texas Faculty Collaborati ve:College & Career Readiness Initiative

• THECB has established the college and career readiness standards Faculty Collaborative Initiative to provide faculty at institutions of higher education who prepare pre-service teachers with the latest information and resources regarding the implementation of the standards.

• The activities of the Faculty Collaborative are designed to ensure that prospective teachers receive preparation that is closely aligned with the College and Career Readiness Standards. This will in turn allow new teachers to better prepare their students to be college-ready.

Explore the initiative’s resources in your core content area at: http://www.txfacultycollaboratives.org/

Page 57: Module 3Module 3 AVATAR Teams: Aligning Courses Through Critical Conversations  1

57

Critical Conversations

Student Success Assessments

Dual Credit, Early College High Schools

Student Support Services

Educational Policies and Practices

Classroom Instruction, Textbooks, Grading, etc.

Discipline Specific CourseCurriculum

Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills

Impact of Developmental Education and Texas Success Initiative Dual Credit, Early College High Schools

Student Support Services

Educational Policies and Practices

Classroom Instruction, Textbooks Grading, etc.

Discipline Reference Course Profiles

College & Career Readiness Standards

Secondary Post-SecondaryGraduate College/Career Ready Graduate Career Ready