Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

  • Upload
    ed3l

  • View
    227

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    1/49

    TE 4103 SISTEM KOMUNIKASI BERGERAK

    Modul 6 Teknik-Teknik Mengatasi Fading

    Jurusan Teknik Elektro Program StudiS1

    INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI TELKOM2008

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    2/49

    Typical Mobile Radio Propagation Channel

    TimeFrequency

    Amplitude

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    3/49

    Fading Mechanisms Time dispersion

    Time variations of the channel are caused by motion of the antenna Channel changes every half a wavelength Moving antenna gives Doppler spread Fast fading requires short packet durations, thus high bit rates Time dispersion poses requirements on synchronization and rate of convergence

    of channel estimation

    Interleaving may help to avoid burst errors

    Frequency dispersion Delayed reflections cause intersymbol interference (ISI) Channel Equalization may be needed.

    Frequency selective fading Multipath delay spreads require long symbol times Frequency diversity or spread spectrum may help

    RSL Fluctuation Shadowing, obstruction, etc

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    4/49

    Time Dispersion and Frequency Dispersion

    Time Domain Channel variations Delay spread

    Interpretation Fast Fading InterSymbol Interference

    Correlation Distance Channel equalization

    Frequency Doppler spectrum Frequency selective fading

    Domain Intercarrier Interference Coherence bandwidth

    Interpretation

    Time DispersionFrequency Dispersion

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    5/49

    Effect of Fading

    Freq.

    Freq.

    Spectrald

    ensity

    Spectral

    density

    Coherent BW, Bc

    Bc

    Bs

    Bs

    Freq. Selective Fading

    Freq. Flat Fading

    TX BW > Channel BW

    Bs > Bc

    TX BW < Channel BWBs < Bc

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    6/49

    Statistical Fluctuations

    Area-mean power

    is determined by path loss

    is an average over 100 m - 5 km

    Local-mean power

    is caused by local 'shadowing' effects

    has slow variations is an average over 40 (few meters)

    d (m)

    P (dB)

    Instantaneous power

    fluctuations are caused by multipath reception

    depends on location and frequency

    depends on time if antenna is in motion

    has fast variations (fades occur about every half a wave length)

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    7/49

    Fading Mitigation Techniques

    Three techniques commonly use to

    combat the effect of fading without

    increasing TX Power and BW: diversity,

    channel encoding, and equalization.

    While Fading margin and Power control

    are used to maintain a good signal

    reception at Receiver.

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    8/49

    Fading Mitigation Technique:

    ( Diversity )

    Diversity exploits the random nature of radio

    propagation by finding the independent signal

    paths. If one path undergo a deep fade, another

    path may have a strong signal. Usually employed to reduce the depth and

    duration of fade experienced by receiver in flat

    fading channel.

    Types of diversity: spatial, frequency, time, and

    polarization

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    9/49

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    10/49

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    11/49

    Spatial Diversity

    Use two or more receiving antenna

    While one antenna sees a null signal, the

    others may receive a peak signals.

    The received signals are then combined and

    processed by an algorithm to get best

    reception.

    Can be implemented in both BS and MS

    receiver

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    12/49

    Spatial Diversity

    Combining algorithm commonly used: Selective, Equal gain,

    and Maximal ratio combining.

    Antenna is spaced

    each other by an odd

    integer multiply of

    /4, usually d > 8 .

    Spatial diversity can

    improve SNR at

    receiver by as much

    as 20 dB to 30 dB.

    wo

    w

    1

    wK

    Processor

    ro(t)

    r1(t)

    rK(t)

    y(t)d

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    13/49

    Selective Combiner

    G1

    G2

    Gm

    Switching Logic

    or

    Demodulator

    output

    Variable gain

    Ant. 1

    Ant. 2

    Ant. m

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    14/49

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    15/49

    Selective Combining

    Receiver only select one strongest signal to detect.

    If average SNR of received signal in a branch = , and thresholdSNR = , then probability that M branches of antenna receivesignals with SNR below the threshold is:

    P( i < ) = PM( ) = (1 - e- / )

    In other word, probability that received signal SNR above the

    threshold is :

    P(i

    > ) = 1 - PM

    ( ) = 1 (1 - e- / )

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    16/49

    Selective CombiningExample: 4 antenna diversity is used. If average SNR is 20 dB,

    determine the probability that SNR will drop below 10 dB (badreception), and also that good reception (SNR above 10 dB) will mostlytake place. Compare with single antenna receiver!

    Answer:Threshold SNR = = 10 dB, = 20 dB, / = 0.1

    P4(

    i< 10 dB) = (1 e-0.1)4 = 0.000082, and

    P4(

    i> 10 dB) = 1- (1 e-0.1)4 = 0.999918 or 99.9918%

    With single antenna:

    P( i< 10 dB) = (1 e-0.1) = 0.095, andP

    (

    i> 10 dB) = 1- (1 e-0.1) = 0.905 or 90.5%

    Improvement factor about 3 order in magnitude!

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    17/49

    Max. Ratio Combiner

    G1

    G2

    Gm

    Co-phase

    and

    Sum

    output

    Variable gain

    Ant. 1

    Ant. 2

    Ant. m

    Detector

    1

    2

    m

    M

    Adaptive control

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    18/49

    Max. Ratio Combining Signals from each branch/antenna are co-phased and

    individually weighted to provide coherent addition to getoptimal SNR.

    Probability that received signal SNR below threshold is:

    Probability of good reception:

    ( ) =

    =

    M

    k

    k

    MkeP 1

    1/

    )!1(

    )/(

    11

    ( ) =

    =

    M

    k

    k

    M

    keP

    1

    1/

    )!1(

    )/(1

    G C

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    19/49

    Equal Gain Combining

    If weight of each branch is set to unity and

    co-phased, Max. ratio combining becomeequal gain combining.

    Less complex with slightly lower

    performance than max. ratio combining. Without continuously adapt each weight of

    branches differently, it allows receiver to

    exploit received signals simultaneously.

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    20/49

    CDMA RAKE Receiver

    Correlator m

    Correlator 2

    Correlator 1

    .

    .

    .

    .

    Int. DCr(t)

    IF or base band

    CDMA signal

    with multipathcomponents

    Z1

    Z2

    Zm

    Z Z m(t) 1

    2

    m

    Since chip rate of CDMA much greater than coherence BW, delay spread

    merely provide a multiple delayed version of signals at receiver. Instead ofcausing ISI, RAKE receiver attempts to collect multipath signals, process it by

    separate correlator receiver, and combine the signals to have a better detection.

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    21/49

    C(t)

    C(t- 2)

    C(t- n)

    delay adj.

    korelator

    BTS

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    22/49

    Frequency Diversity

    TX

    TX

    RX

    RX

    RF

    Branching

    Network

    Combiner

    F2

    F3

    F4

    F1

    TX

    TX

    RX

    RX

    RF

    Branching

    Network

    Combiner

    F2

    F3

    F4

    F1

    Use two or more carrier frequency for transmission with spacing aboutUse two or more carrier frequency for transmission with spacing about

    2 5 % f2 5 % foo..

    Need to employ two or more Transmitter and ReceiverNeed to employ two or more Transmitter and Receiver Improvement factor :Improvement factor :

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    23/49

    Channel Equalizer

    i time index

    Vequalizer order

    D delay index

    b0

    z-1 z-1 z-1

    bD+vbV-1

    (i-D-v)(i-D) (i-D-V+1)

    (i)o

    ut

    Adaptive

    algorithm

    (i)

    (i)

    Channel equalizer is employed to compensate ISI. Since multipath fading channel is dynamic, equalizer must

    be adaptive

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    24/49

    Types of Equalizer

    Linear: Transversal filter (Zero forcing, LMS, RLS,

    fast RLS, Sq. root RLS)

    Lattice Filter (Gradient RLS) Non Linear:

    DFE (LMS, RLS, Fast RLS, Sq. root RLS)

    ML Symbol Detection MLSE

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    25/49

    Time Diversity

    1 m+1

    2 m+2

    M 2m nm

    .

    n columns

    m

    r

    o

    w

    s

    Read in

    Coded bits

    from

    encoder

    Read out bits to modulator one row at a time

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    26/49

    Channel Encoding

    Channel encoding is done by encode the data into aspecial form, and introduce redundancies in thetransmitted data.

    It protects data/information from error and distortion

    introduced by the channel. Redundant bits increase data rate hence the bandwidth,

    but improve BER performance especially in fadingchannel.

    Reduce BW efficiency of the link in high SNR condition,but provide excellent performance in low SNR condition

    Two types mostly used: Block Code and Convolutionalcode

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    27/49

    Fading Margin

    K u a t s i n yd i t a m b a h f

    Fading margin depends upon target availabilityof the link/coverage.

    Greateravailabilityrequires larger fading margin.

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    28/49

    Fading Margin

    ( )

    ===

    2

    FMerf

    2

    1

    2

    1dm)m(p)Thm(PRP

    mTh

    Th

    If fading margin FM applied to the link, then probability

    that RSL at receiver separated at distance R above the

    threshold can be written as:

    Fading margin improve signal reception hence the

    link performance, in an expense of increasing

    transmission power.

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    29/49

    Power Control

    User 2

    User 1

    d1

    d2

    Basestation

    Pr2

    Pr1

    Pt2Pt1

    Mitigating the effect of shadowing and near-far problem

    If user 1 at 3 km from BTS transmitting with 100

    mWatt, how much power is needed by user 2 at

    9 km away from BTS using Okumura Hatta

    model in urban area to achieve the same power

    at the BTS with 10 m high above ground level?

    Answer: Path loss slope Hatta-Urban is( 44.9

    6.55 log 10) =38.35.

    W2 = (d2/d1)3.835 W1 = 38.3 dBm =6.76 Watt

    P C t l

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    30/49

    Power Control

    0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 0 0- 3 0

    - 2 0

    - 1 0

    0

    1 0

    2 0

    3 0

    T im e s l o t ( 0 . 6 7 m s )

    Signallevel

    (dB)

    R e c e iv e d s i g n a l a m p l i t u d eC o n t r o l le d t r a n s m i t p o w e rC o n t r o l le d S I R ( ta r g e t = 1 0 d B )

    Channel is estimated at the

    receiver, then Tx is instructedto adjust Tx power according to

    the estimated channel (e.g.

    SNR).

    Problem:

    Control rate >> fading rateControl step size single step

    or variable step

    What is the benefit/drawbacks

    of single or variable step size ?

    Rayleigh fading

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    31/49

    Pt

    Pt

    Pr1

    Pr1

    Menjadi sangat fital karena sharing resource yang sama, setiap userberprilaku sebagai random noise terhadap yang lain.

    user 2user 1

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    32/49

    Power kontrol sangat bagus

    10 km5 km

    Subc-1Subc-2

    Subc-1

    Subc-2

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    33/49

    User 2

    User 1 S/N = 1/10

    S/N = 10

    frekuensi

    power Distribusi powerdi penerima

    Kualitas voice user 2 >> user 1, fenomena ini disebut problem

    near-far. Dari dua user tadi kalau ditambahkan user ketiga

    akan menurunkan kualitas baik user 3 maupun dua user yang

    sudah ada.

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    34/49

    Mengatasi problem near-far sehingga Pr(i) di BTS (up-link)

    akan sama. Jika syarat S/N tiap user = 1/10, maka kapasitas

    akan menjadi 11 user (meningkat signifikan).

    Pt

    PtPr1 Pr2

    user 1

    user 2

    user 3user M

    Pr3

    PrM

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    35/49

    frekuensi

    power

    User 1, S/N = 1/10

    User 2, S/N = 1/10

    User 4, S/N = 1/10

    User 3, S/N = 1/10

    User 5, S/N = 1/10

    User 6, S/N = 1/10

    User 8, S/N = 1/10

    User 7, S/N = 1/10

    User 9, S/N = 1/10

    User 10, S/N = 1/10

    User 11, S/N = 1/10

    Dengan power kontrol kapasitas dimaksimalkan

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    36/49

    MS mengirim Pt maksimum ; pasti akan bisa diterima oleh

    BTS, namun interferensi akan meningkat MS mengirim Pt minimum ; ada kemungkinan tidak diterima

    oleh BTS tetapi interferensi sangat kecil IS-95 memberi solusi dengan :

    Open loop mekanisme initial transmit power tanpa bantuan BTS

    Close loop mekanisme pengendalian transmit power dengan

    bantuan BTS

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    37/49

    Untuk mengatasi log-normal shadowing Dengan access probe Pt MS diestimasi dengan Pr MS

    PtPr

    1

    n

    Access probe

    Pt(1) = -Pr - 73 +NOM_PWR +INIT_PWR IS-95

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    38/49

    PATH LOSS

    RAYLEIGH FADING (fading cepat)

    LOGNORMAL FADING (fading lambat)

    Distance (km)

    SignalLeve

    l(dBm)

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    39/49

    Koreksi

    access probe

    pertama

    Koreksi

    access probe

    kedua

    Waktu

    MS

    trans. power

    initial

    random random

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    40/49

    Untuk mengatasi fluktuasi receive power karena Rayleigh

    fading (fading cepat). BTS memeriksa kualitas up-link secara kontinyu. Jika kualitas jelek, BTS akan mengirim command(PCB)via

    down-link untuk menaikan Pt MS.

    Jika kualitas terlalu bagus akan dilakukan hal sebaliknya. Eb/N0 digunakan sebagai indikator kualitas link. PCB = +1dB jika Pt MS harus dinaikan dan -1dB jika

    sebaliknya Karena digunakan untuk mengatasi fading cepat, maka

    proses pengendalian harus berlangsung cepat sehingga PCB

    disisipkan pada kanal traffik arah down-link

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    41/49

    VOCODER KONVOLUSI MUX SPREADING

    Power control (PCB)

    800 bps

    19,2 kbps9,6 kbps 19,2 kbps 1,2288 Mcps

    Power control

    bit position

    0 atau 1 tanpa proteksi

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    42/49

    PCG0 PCG1 PCG2 PCG3 PCG12 PCG13 PCG14 PCG15

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

    PCG7

    1 0 1 1

    (11)10

    20ms

    1,25 ms

    Probabilitas meletakan PCB

    PCB = 0 MS harus naik 1 dB

    PCB = 1 MS harus turun 1 dB

    CONTROL POSITION

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    43/49

    UL

    DL

    PCG0 PCG1 PCG2 PCG3 PCG4 PCG5 PCG6 PCG7 PCG8

    PCG0 PCG1 PCG2 PCG3 PCG4 PCG5 PCG6 PCG7 PCG8 PCG9

    Eb/N0 diukur di BTS

    Selama menerima PCG8BTS memutuskan kirim 1 atau 0

    BTS MENGIRIM

    PCB

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    44/49

    RX

    DEMESTIMASI

    FERTh. Eb/N0

    DECISION

    EST >Th PCB = 1

    EST < Th PCB = 0

    ESTIMASI

    Eb/N0

    FTC TRANSMITTER

    PCB

    BASE STATION

    DARI MS

    KE MS

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    45/49

    TRANSMITTER RTC

    DECISION

    PCB = 0 , +1dB

    PCB = 1, -1dB

    (-1)

    RXDEM

    ESTIMASI

    RX TOTALPr-Pr

    K= -73 (dB)

    NOM_PWR (dB)

    INIT_PWR (dB)

    Pt yang harus dipakai

    selama 1,25 ms

    TCH

    +1 dB atau -1 dB

    MOBILE STATION

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    46/49

    Some practical approaches

    H t h dl f t lti th f di

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    47/49

    How to handle fast multipath fading

    Analog

    User must speak slowly

    GSM

    Error correction and interleaving to avoidburst errors

    Error detection and speech decoding

    Fade margins in cell planning

    DECT

    Diversity reception at base station

    IS95

    Wideband transmission averages channelbehaviour

    This avoids burst errors and deep fades

    (CDMA2000)

    H d t h dl D l d ?

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    48/49

    How do systems handle Doppler spreads?

    Analog Carrier frequency is low enough to avoid problems

    GSM Channel bit rate well above Doppler spread

    TDMA during each bit / burst transmission the channel is fairly

    constant.

    Receiver training/updating during each transmission burst

    Feedback frequency correction

    DECT Only small Doppler spreads are to be anticipated for

    Original DECT concept did not standardize an equalizer

    IS95 (CDMA2000) Downlink: Pilot signal for synchronization and channel estimation

    Uplink: Continuous tracking of each signal

    How do systems handle delay spreads?

  • 8/6/2019 Modul 6.Fading Mitigation

    49/49

    How do systems handle delay spreads?

    Analog

    Narrowband transmission

    GSM

    Adaptive channelequalization

    Channel estimation training sequence

    DECT Use the handset only in small cells with small delay spreads

    Diversity and channel selection can help a little bitpick a channel where late reflections are in a fade

    IS95

    Rake receiver separately recovers signals over paths with excessive dela

    Digital Audio Broacasting

    OFDM multi-carrier modulationThe radio channel is split into manynarrowband (ISI-free)subchannels