Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MODERN CATALYSIS IN FINE CHEMICAL TRANSFORMATIONS
Technology, IP and Supply Chain Considerations
Paolo BraiucaProduct Manager – Catalysts
1
02
Emission
Control
Process
Technologies
Precious
Metal
Products
New
Business
Fine
Chemicals
Custom Pharma
Solutions
Controlled
Substances
APIs & Life Cycle
Management
Catalysts
High technology portfolio of Chemo and Biocatalysts products
Outstanding sustainable and efficient
manufacturing solutions
Market leading expertise
Global resources
• Heterogeneous
catalysts
• Homogeneous catalysts
• Chiral catalysts
• Biocatalysts and
Enzymes
• Ligands
HIGH TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO
4
HOM. HYDROG. Expiring IP
HOM. HYDROG.
Novel Technologies
COUPLING Innovation
COUPLING Commodities
HETCAT “Black Box”
BIOCATALYSIS Complex IP
Josiphos, Duphos,
Me-BIPHEP;
Noyori Tech.
Buchwald;
JM’s Pd Pi-Allyl.
Mostly IP free.
Buchwald ligands
commoditisation.
Great constant
“hidden”
innovation
Strong promises;
some great results; is
it under-delivering?Transfer hydrogenation;
Ester Hydrogenation; Novel
concepts (Baratta catalyst).
Innovation
IP Generation
Defend Profitability
Fund Innovation
Innovation
Competitiveness
Cost Reduction
Defend Profitability
Price reduction
Increased Utilisation
Commoditisation
IP Expiration
Where is the common ground?
Innovation. Cost. Benefit.
IP Protection
IP free solutions
Innovation Low cost
UniquenessBroad and
prompt availability
How can End Users and Technology Providers work together?
The Technology Provider Perspective
TEST ASSUMPTION
100 USD / kg Product
Catalyst Cost Contribution
10 USD/g Catalyst Price = 1% w/w loading
50 USD/g Catalyst Price = 0.2% w/w loading
150 USD/g Catalyst Price = 0.06% w/w loading
How to Achieve the Target
Complementary vs Competitive Technologies
Focus on the Solution not on the Technology
Short Term or Long Term Objective?
Can you decide a priori?
Noyori hydrogenation and transfer
hydrogenation catalysts and ADHs
Possible selectivity problems
with Noyori catalysts.
Biocatalysis stronger option.
Noyori catalysts good activity
but low stereoselectivity.
Biocatalysis stronger option.
First generation Noyori
catalysts (Ru-BINAP) or ADHs
Chemocatalysis
Catalyst screening
Reaction conditions screening
Custom catalyst development
Catalyst manufacturing development
Catalyst scale up
How to achieve the target
Biocatalysis
Enzyme screening
Reaction conditions screening
Enzyme engineering
Cloning/Expression host development
Fermentation development
Fermentation scale up
Application Process intensification
Application Process Scale up
Chemocatalysis
Limited number of catalysts
Broad set of reaction conditions
Optimise catalyst cost/price
How to achieve the target
Biocatalysis
Huge number of catalysts
Hardly the same catalyst for two processes
Significant range of reaction conditions
Optimise catalyst performance via enzyme engineering
Optimise enzyme production costs
Chemocatalysis
A complex technology with a
complex specialised
manufacturing
Metal management
Transportation, custom clearance
and duties
Role of the Supply Chain
Biocatalysis
A complex technology with a
(relatively) simple manufacturing
Delocalisation of the Fermentation
Role of local Toll Manufacturers
The importance of Trust
Two “Innovative Examples”
NEW PI-ALLYL PRECATALYSTS INSPIRATION
16
Buchwald Palladacycles:
Advantages:
- Air / moisture stable
- Easily activated at or below rt
- Quantitative generation of L-Pd(0)
Bruno, N. C.; Tudge, M. T.; Buchwald, S. L. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 916
Issues:
- Scalability (1st Gen)
- Genotoxic carbazole generation (2nd, 3rd Gen)
- Limited ligand scope (1st, 2nd Gen)
carbazole
NEW PI-ALLYL PRECATALYSTS INSPIRATION
17
JM SOLUTION: (L)Pd(π(π(π(π-allyl)Cl Complexes
Seechurn, C. C. C. J.; Parisel, S. L.; Colacot, T. J. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 7918.
PHOSPHINE PI-ALLYL PALLADIUM CATALYSTS
18
XPhosPd(crotyl)Cl
Pd-170
RuPhosPd(crotyl)Cl
Pd-171
[XantPhosPd(allyl)]Cl
Pd-177
[BrettPhosPd(crotyl)]OTf
Pd-173
CATALYST COMPARISON: 2°AMINATION
19
PdH2N
L
OMs
PdH2N
L
ClPdH2N
L
Cl
RuPhos G1 RuPhos G2
RuPhos G3
Cy2P Oi-Pr
Oi-Pr
RuPhos (L)
a Corrected GC yields, b With 0.5 mol % additional RuPhos added. c 2.5 h.
entry catalyst conv (%)a
1 RuPhos G1 66
2 RuPhos G2 4
3 RuPhos G3 5
4 (RuPhos)Pd(allyl)Cl 80
5 (RuPhos)Pd(crotyl)Cl 87/97b/100b,c
6 (RuPhos)Pd(cinnamyl)Cl 95
7 RuPhos G1 / carbazole (0.5 mol%) 6
8 (RuPhos)Pd(crotyl)Cl + carbazole (0.5 mol%) 5
DeAngelis, A.J.; Gildner, P. G.; Chow, R.; Colacot, T. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 6794
NEW PI-ALLYL Pd CATALYSTS IN ACTION!
20
1°Amination 2°Amination Amidation
N
NC
OO
Bn
95%
Pd-175
Oxazolidinones
MeO
NH
S
N
85%
Pd-175
Aminothiazoles
N
92%
Pd-162
NC
NMe2
Cycloproplyamines
Indoles Sulfonamides
Alcohols
N N
MeO
OMe
O
94%Pd-170
Suzuki C-C α-Ketone Arylation
DeAngelis, A.J.; Gildner, P. G.; Chow, R.; Colacot, T. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 6794
Gildner, P. G.; DeAngelis, A.J.; Colacot, T. J. Org. Lett. 2016, article in press
Ru Tethered Catalyst
Higher stability in the reaction conditions
Higher activity
Possible use in hydrogenation
‘Difficult’ substrates become possible targets
alfa-chloroacetophenone, polyfunctionalized molecules, propargyl ketones
NH2
NRu
Cl
Ts
NH
N
Ru
Cl
Ts
NPh
NH
Ph
S OO
C4-[(R,R)-teth-TsDpen RuCl]
Ru
Cl
C4-[(S,S)-teth-TsDpen RuCl]
C1-360
C1-350
NPh
NH
Ph
S OO
C3-[(R,R)-teth-MsDpen RuCl]
Ru
Cl
C3-[(S,S)-teth-MsDpen RuCl]
C1-311
C1-301
NPh
NH
Ph
S OO
C4-[(R,R)-teth-MsDpen RuCl]
Ru
Cl
C4-[(S,S)-teth-MsDpen RuCl]
C1-361
C1-351
NPh
NH
Ph
S OO
C3-[(R,R)-teth-TrisDpen RuCl]
Ru
Cl
C3-[(S,S)-teth-TrisDpen RuCl]
C1-318
C1-308
NPh
NH
Ph
S OO
C3-[(R,R)-teth-MtsDpen RuCl]
Ru
Cl
C3-[(S,S)-teth-MtsDpen RuCl]
C1-314
C1-304
NPh
NH
Ph
S OO
Ru
Cl
C4-[(R,R)-teth-TrisDpen RuCl]
C4-[(S,S)-teth-TrisDpen RuCl]
C1-368
C1-358
Wills et al. Organic Letters 2014, 16, 374; Wills et al. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 8594.
Organic improvement on standard Noyori T.H.
Application to a very innovative
transformation disclosed by Merck
Mangion, Chen et al., Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 2310.
Novel Applications
25
COMPLEX CHEMISTRY.SIMPLY DELIVERED.
www.jmfinechemicals.com