42
Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Models of Inservice Training

Claire Bradin SiskinUniversity of Pittsburgh

Page 2: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

• It is often lamented that teachers aren't using CALL to best advantage or that they aren't using CALL at all.

• ("faculty," "instructors," "professors," etc.)

Page 3: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

• "Teachers can't/won't use CALL because they don't have enough training."

Page 4: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Inservice training:

• "professional development"

• "staff development"

• "personal development opportunities"

• "faculty orientation"

Page 5: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

"teaching teachers after they have been hired"

Page 6: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

I have discovered:

• There are very few formal, systematic descriptions of CALL inservice training for CALL.

• There are very few guidelines.

Page 7: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Overview:• General description

• Observations on best practices

Page 8: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Types:

•workshops• self-paced tutorials: handouts, videotapes,

CD-ROMs, Web

Page 9: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Training in CALL is sometimes perceived as just training on how to use computers.

Other types of training are also needed.

Content:

Page 10: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Content:

CALL

"literacy"

Pedagogy;

use of CALL

General computer literacy

Page 11: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Comment from an ESL instructor:

"I know what to do with the computer. I

know how to make the software work. But

I don't know what to do with the students."

Page 12: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Basic characteristic of CALL workshops:

• There is a very wide range of computer literacy and knowledge of CALL among the participants.

Page 13: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Workshops:

• from 10 minutes – 2 weeks

• typically 1-2 hours a session

Page 14: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Inservice training:

• sometimes voluntary

• sometimes required by law(or by administrators)

• sometimes accompanied by credit

Page 15: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Observationson best practices

(since 1984…)

Page 16: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

In ideal world, inservice training ...

• shouldn't be a one-shot deal

• should be ongoing

• should be cyclical

• should be practical

Page 17: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

• Many teachers don’t want “training.”

• They want results.

• They want information on demand.

• They want specific solutions to specific problems on an as-needed basis.

• They want just what they have determined to be useful, just when they want it.

What do teachers want?

Page 18: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Find out what teachers really want to know, and start from there.

Page 19: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Choosing topics:

• Do a needs assessment; survey

• Solicit suggestions via email

• Ask the curriculum supervisors for suggestions

• Each year: inventory of computer skills for new instructors

• The more flexible, the better

Page 20: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Increase teachers' comfort level by addressing personal needs:

• using a spreadsheet• screen shots• send attachments to email• scan pictures and text

Page 21: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

A big paradox:

In-service training may be counter-productive if teachers are required to attend.

Page 22: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

If they aren’t required to attend, some teachers may never acquire the desired skills.

Page 23: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

• In some cases, teachers can be paid to attend CALL workshops.

• (This may sweeten the situation.)

Page 24: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

In advance:

• Describe what computer skills are needed

• in the session description.

Page 25: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Don’t do all the workshops yourself. Outsiders have a special aura.

• other teachers• other units on campus• experts from nearby campuses• graduate students• visitors

Page 26: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Allow for individual learning styles:

• handouts

• self-paced tutorials: videotapes, CD-ROMs, Web

Page 27: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

large groupspairs or small groupsobserving while others work

Allow for individual learning styles:

Page 28: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Allow for differences in age and status.

Page 29: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Some teachers respond better to one-on-one sessions in a private place.

Page 30: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Training needs to be more than just "hands-on."

• Background information

• Demonstrations

• Time to discuss and reflect

Page 31: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Hands-on workshops:

Don’t assume that each participant always needs his/her own computer.

Page 32: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Be sure that all computers are configured correctly for the activity.

In advance:

Page 33: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Have tech support available.

Page 34: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

For hands-on activities:

Provide a high ratio of assistants to participants.

Page 35: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Recommended:1 “helper” per 5 participants

• 10 participants: 1 presenter + 1 assistant

• 15 participants: 1 presenter + 2 assistants

• 20 participants: 1 presenter + 3 assistants, etc.

Page 36: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

During the workshop:

• Have infinite patience.

• Allow participants to work at their own pace.

Page 37: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Realize that not everyone easily associates one's own computer screen with what is projected.

Page 38: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Software/website evaluation activities need to be broken down into small chunks.

Page 39: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Provide detailed handouts.

Use large screen shots that are easy to read.

Page 40: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

People lose handouts.Put them online.

Page 41: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

For workshops longer than an hour,

• Allow for breaks

• Serve refreshments if you can

• Provide opportunities for socializing and networking.

Page 42: Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh

Afterwards:

• Pay attention to workshop evaluations.

• Use constructive comments.