Upload
phamkiet
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Modelling aquatic ecosystem services related to global environmental change by a global modelling framework
Jan H. Janse ([email protected])
Arthur Beusen (PBL) Anne van Dam (UNESCO-IHE) Wolf Mooij (NIOO) Eline Boelee (WaterHealth) Marcel Kok (PBL) Antoine le Gal (PBL/AgroParisTech) et al.
2
Outline 1. Overview of model framework 2. Water topics 3. Example results 4. Scenario analysis (Rio+20/CBD): Trend + 3 pathways
JH Janse
3
IMAGE-GLOBIO: objective
GLOBAL MODEL, linking the main socio-economic factors to environmental changes, biodiversity/ecosystem services and human wellbeing
Focus on global scale and trends
Spatially explicit (30 or 5 arc minutes grid)
Target policy level = UNEP, CBD, OECD, Min. of Foreign Affairs, IPBES, EU, &
May provide the ‘global context’ for REGIONAL scale models
JH Janse
4
Scenario drivers
(economy, population, technology, policies)
Socio-Econ system
Agriculture & land use
Energy supply & demand
Live-stock
Forest
manageme
nt
Agricult.
systems
Earth System
Land
Nutrient Balances
Atmosphere-Ocean
Atmospheric
composition & climate
model
Impacts
Land Degra-
dation
Flood Risks
Biodiversity
(terr. + aquatic)
Ecosyst.
Goods &
Services
Policy
Response
Climate
Human
Development
Agricultural economy and forestry
Land Cover and Use Emissions
Energy supply
Hydrolog. Cycle Carbon Cycle
Crop & Grass Growth Natural vegetation
Land & Biodiv
Air pollution &
Energy
Water Stress Agricult.
Impacts
Climate
Impacts
Energy conversion Energy demand
Water Quality
IMAGE-GLOBIO model framework
JH Janse
Topics and options
A. Global trends: population, food demand, energy demand
=> land use, water use
B. Behavioural trends: dietary options, energy mix => land use, water use
C. Resource efficiency, climate change mitigation
D. Sustainable catchment management
Impacts: water shortages, water quality, algal blooms, biodiversity and ecosystem services, flood risk, &
Synergies and trade-offs of options
JH Janse
5
Central: Catchment approach, hydrological cycle
Rio+20, 15 mei 2012
7
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS: location Global Lakes and Wetlands Database (GLWD)
JH Janse
Water(y) outputs:
a. Implemented:
b. a. Hydrology and flow; river discharge; flood risks; wetland areas =>PCR-GLOBWB (UU)
b. Soil moisture, irrigation, water stress => LPJ (PIK)
a. c. Water temperature =>PCR-GLOBWB (UU)
b. d. Water quality (N and P), retention => GNM
c. e. Algal blooms => GLOBIO-Aqua/PCLake
d. f. Biodiversity intactness => GLOBIO-Aqua
e. Planned: a. g. Other ecosystem services of lakes and wetlands: C
sequestration; fish; cultural (p.m.)
f. h. Other biodiversity indicators; linking biodiversity and processes
JH Janse, Feb. 2015
8
9
Dams
and river
regulation
Irrigation
(Agricultural)
eutrophication
Overfishing
Hydraulic
infrastructure
Climate change
Deforestation
Wetland conversion
Urban pollution
(point sources)
(modified after Ratner et al, 2004; in MEA), 2005
Invasive species
Drivers of aquatic biodiversity change in catchments
9
JH Janse
Dams and
water use Climate (temp.,rain) Land use
Water quality
(N, P)
GlobalNutrientModel
Biodiv.of
RIVERS
Biodiv.of
WETLANDS
Biodiv. of
LAKES
Water flow Water temp.
Empirical biodiv. relations (GLOBIO)
GLWD map
IMAGE
water network
(accumulation
in catchment)
lake depths
Wetland
conversion
GLOBIO-Aquatic model chain
Algal blooms
in LAKES
GLOBIO-Aquatic model chain (v.1, 2011)
Hydrological models
Weighted-averaged aquatic biodiversity
JH Janse
10
-5.5 14.5
45.5
61.5
Adjusted River basins, based on UNHGRDC
11 Vorosmarty et al (2000)
JH Janse, 2014
Hydrological model PCR-GLOBWB, linked to GLWD
Mm3/year
0 - 50
50 - 100
100 - 150
150 - 200
200 - 250
250 - 300
300 - 350
350 - 400
400 - 450
450 - 500
> 500
Annual accumulated total runoff, EUROMOD, prog accueuro, ldd Storms
Wetland area: losses => implications for biodiversity, ecosystem services, LU planning
Potential wetland map (from PCR-GLOBWB)
Mm3/year
0 - 50
50 - 100
100 - 150
150 - 200
200 - 250
250 - 300
300 - 350
350 - 400
400 - 450
450 - 500
> 500
Annual accumulated total runoff, EUROMOD, prog accueuro, ldd Storms
13
Land use and nutrient model
JH Janse
Source apportionment: dominant N/P source in surface water by grid cell
Current and potential hydropower stations
15
Potential
JH Janse
Empirical relations for biodiversity intactness (GLOBIO-aqua)
0,0
1,0
0,001 0,01 0,1 1
MS
A
Total Phosporus [mg/l]
Eutrophication and biodiversity
intactness in lakes
Shallow lakes Deep lakes Shallow lakes Deep lakes
17
MSA-aquatic: 2000
Combined results: MSA-aquatic
JH Janse
18
MSA-aquatic: Baseline 2050
JH Janse
19
Difference 2000 -> 2050
JH Janse
20
GLOBIO: MSA-terrestrial
JH Janse
Some output for LAKES: Biodiversity intactness (MSA); Harmful algal blooms
21
For LAKES, low MSA correlates with high cyanobacteria
JH Janse
JH Janse
22
Global scenario analysis
Some recent assessments with IMAGE-GLOBIO
23
2010 (COP CBD, Nagoya)
OECD-EO, 2012 2012 (Rio Conference)
JH Janse
CBD, 2014
Trend scenario: future water challenges
Water shortages
Deteriorating water quality (urban and agriculture)
Increase in flood risks
Biodiversity decline
Hydropower
People living with water shortage
25
JH Janse
26
Rost et al. “Human alterations of the terrestrial water cycle through land
management” (Adv. Geosciences 2008)
Period [1991-2000]
Actual vs natural vegetation
% changes in water fluxes:
Decrease in transpiration
Increase in river discharges
(Rost et al. 2008)
Human alteration of the water cycle
Biodiversity decline in the Trend scenario, and main drivers
27
JH Janse
Global average MSA loss and contribution of drivers
28
JH Janse
Pathways to achieve the 2050 targets
Main assumption
Global
Technology
Focus on large-scale technologically optimal solutions:
intensive agriculture and a high level of international
coordination
Decentralized
Solutions
Focus on decentralized solutions: local energy production;
agriculture that is interwoven with natural corridors and
national policies that regulate equitable access to food
Consumption
Change
Focus on changes in human consumption patterns:
limiting meat intake per capita; reduce waste in the
agricultural production chain; less energy-intensive
lifestyle
29
JH Janse
Three scenarios for 2050 that meet biodiversity objectives
..in strong synergy with meeting other development goals (SDGs)
0
20
40
60
80
Current Trend Rio+20
Green House Gas Emissions Gt CO2 equivalent per year
2050
Trend 2050
Rio+20
Current
Climate change
32
Key issues for maintaining biodiversity
Transition production-consumption chain; e.g. for protein-food
Forest protection for climate (in stead of biofuels)
Ecosystem protection and ecological network
Green development mechanism
Combination of measures neceassary
Fundamental changes needed; pathways are not being followed
JH Janse
References
Janse, J.H. et al. (2015). GLOBIO-Aquatic, a global model of human impact on the biodiversity of inland aquatic ecosystems. Environmental Science and Policy 48: 99-114.
Kuiper, J.J., et al. (2014). The impact of river regulation on the biodiversity intactness of floodplain wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 22, 647-658
Stehfest, E. et al. (2014). Integrated assessment of global environmental change with IMAGE 3.0. Model description and policy applications. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Van Beek, L.P.H. et al. (2011). Global monthly water stress: 1. Water balance and water availability. Water Resourc. Res. 47
OECD (2012) OED Environmental Outlook to 2050
PBL (2014) How sectors can contribute to sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity. CBD Techn. Series 79.
33
JH Janse