Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www str soft com
STR Groupwww.str-soft.com
Modeling of III-Nitride MOVPEModeling of III Nitride MOVPE
May 2012
Prehistory of STR:1984: Start of the MOCVD modeling activities at Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
1993-1996: Group for modeling of crystal growth and epitaxy at University of Erlangen-Nuernberg, Germany
History of software development2000: Launch of development of the first specialized software2000: Launch of development of the first specialized software2003: First release of commercial software package 2004: First release of the software for device engineering
STR Today:
2More than 40 scientists and software engineers
STR, GmbH2, Erlangen, Germany INFOTECH Co.3,
Kyunggi-Do, South KoreaSTR G Ltd 1
STR US, Inc.2, Richmond, VA
SimSciD Corporation3, Yokohama Japan
STR Group, Ltd.1, St.Petersburg, Russia
Pitotech, Ltd.3,Chang Hua City, Taiwan
Yokohama, Japan
1 – Headquarter and R&D (consulting service and software development)2 – Local offices3 – Local distributors
Bulk crystal growth modeling (Si Ge SiGe GaAs InP SiC AlN Al O Optical Crystals)
3
Bulk crystal growth modeling (Si, Ge, SiGe, GaAs, InP, SiC, AlN, Al2O3, Optical Crystals)Epitaxy and deposition modeling (Si, SiGe, SiC, AlGaAs, AlGaInP, AlGaInN, high-k oxides)Modeling of device operation (LEDs, Laser Diodes, FETs/HEMTs Shottky diodes)
Software & consulting services :
- Modeling of crystal growth from the melts and solutions: CGSim- Modeling of polysilicon deposition by Siemens process: PolySim- Modeling of bulk crystal growth of SiC, AlN, GaN: ViR- Modeling of epitaxy of compound semiconductors: CVDSim
M d li f t l t i d l t i d i Si LED- Modeling of optoelectronic and electronic devices: SimuLED
Customer base:
• More than 160 companies and universities worldwide• Top LED, LD and solar cell manufacturers • Top sapphire, GaAs, GaP, GaN, AlN and SiC wafer manufacturers• Top MOCVD reactor manufacturers• Top MOCVD reactor manufacturers
OutlineOutline
• Motivation for MOVPE modelingMotivation for MOVPE modeling
• Specific features of nitride growth. CVDSim™ as the dedicated software for simulation of nitride growth by MOCVD
• Modeling of nitride growth in industrial reactors with focus on • Modeling of nitride growth in industrial reactors with focus on AlN/AlGaN growth in CCS reactor
• Unsteady effects in growth of GaN-based quantum-well heterostructures
Basic overview of CFD modelingBasic overview of CFD modeling
• (C)omputation (F)luid (D)ynamics – approach to simulate a MOVPE reactor and process using simulate a MOVPE reactor and process using computer modeling
• CFD is used to model the flow heat transfer and • CFD is used to model the flow, heat transfer and mass transport/chemistry in the reactor
• Day by day in house CFD modeling has started in • Day-by-day in-house CFD modeling has started in MOCVD companies about 10-15 years ago when commercial CFD packages became availablecommercial CFD packages became available
CFD modeling: what for?CFD modeling: what for?
N CFD d li i d b ll h j MOCVD • Now CFD modeling is used by all the major MOCVD equipment manufacturers (Aixtron, Veeco, TNSC, Applied Materials ) to design the new reactorsApplied Materials…) to design the new reactors.
• CFD modeling is used also by MOCVD end-users as Hitachi Cable Osram Opto Philips Lumileds Samsung Hitachi Cable, Osram Opto, Philips Lumileds, Samsung LED and others.
M d li f fl d h t t f i it ti • Modeling of flow and heat transfer is quite routine procedure now, focus is shifted to the combination of CFD with advanced chemistry modelsCFD with advanced chemistry models…
Modeling of III nitride MOVPE: main issuesModeling of III-nitride MOVPE: main issues• Complicated gas-phase chemistry and gas-
Creighton et al.,
(2004)
phase nucleation at high pressures
• Complicated surface chemistry – effect of p ytemperature and carrier gas
• Parasitic deposition in wide range of Zavarin et al., (2005)• Parasitic deposition in wide range of temperature variation
O t t f th d li
Parikh et al., (2006)• Optimization of the growth recipe
Output from the modeling
p g p• Understanding of the underlying mechanisms• Optimization of the reactor design• Optimization of the reactor design• Increase of the process yield
CVDSim™Chemical Vapor Deposition Simulator
Simulation Tool for Modeling of CVD Processes in Industrial Reactors
CVDSim Nitride Edition:CVDSim Nitride Edition:• Prediction of the growth rate and composition• Parasitic reactions and particle formationp• Parasitic deposition on injectors and walls (low temperature kinetics,
condensation of the adducts and non-volatile products)Eff t f th l tti i t h ll iti• Effect of the lattice mismatch on alloy composition
Joint Aixtron/STR presentation at ICMOVPE XV, 2010
Modeling is actively used for the ti i ti d d i process optimization and design
of commercial production-scale multi-wafer reactors
GaN growth rate vs pressure in 6x2” CCS reactor
Combination of simulation and experimental analysis has been applied to improve the
performance of the existing reactors and to develop a novel reactor concept
Contour lines of indium compositionp
The use of the inverted precursor supply allows 40 runs of 1 5 mm thick supply allows 40 runs of 1.5 mm thick
GaN without removing parasitic deposits instead of 10 growth runs for
the conventional growth processthe conventional growth process
Deposition rate over the ceiling(modeling results)
µm/hThickness mapping: from convex to concave profile
µm/h
AlN and AlGaN growth in Close Coupled Showerhead reactorCoupled Showerhead reactor
Kinetic model for AlGaN depositionKinetic model for AlGaN deposition• Adsorption and incorporation of all Ga- and some Al-containing
ispecies• Etching of GaN part of AlGaN alloy, etching rate depends on
iti f AlG Ncomposition of AlGaN
H2 NH3Ga
Dandling bondsg
S f t lSurface crystal lattice layer
Gas-phase reaction mechanism in AlN MOVPEGas-phase reaction mechanism in AlN MOVPE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
• Adduct formation• Elimination of methane
1.2.
• Adduct reaction with ammonia• Formation of oligomers• AlN gaseous molecules formation from
3.4.5. g
decomposition of dimers and trimers containing both Al and N
Gas-phase reaction and cluster nucleation Gas-phase reaction and cluster nucleation mechanism in AlN MOVPE
Ways of aluminum losses:formation of oligomers (n3) and AlN particles
S• Species initiating cluster nucleation: AlN vapor• Nucleation and subsequent growth of clusters is due to reactions between AlN nuclei and Al-containing species such as AlN, DMAl:NH2, (DMAl:NH2)2g p , 2, ( 2)2
Gas phase nucleation and cluster Gas phase nucleation and cluster growth/evaporation
Main assumptions used to simulate gas phase nucleation:
Due to their small size, the clusters can be regarded as apseudo gas of heavy molecules
Transport of the clusters and their growth/evaporation aretreated using the first three moments of the size distributionfunction
Particle growth due to interactions with other group-IIIspecies
Effect of the thermophoretic forceEffect of the thermophoretic force
Thermophoretic force prevents particles from reaching the substrate, moving p p p g , gthem in direction opposite to the temperature gradient
surface at ~1000Csurface at 1000 C
Particle density, 3
GaN particle size ranges from 10100 nm, density
Laser scattering experiments,standard MOVPE conditions,
kg/m3from 16108 cm-3sta da d O co d t o s,conventional precursors(TMGa, TMAl, TMIn, ammonia);carrier gas - hydrogen/nitrogen The AlN and AlGaN MOVPE models
were previously successfully verified
J.R. Creighton et al, (2004)were previously successfully verified by the data obtained in the vertical rotating disk and planetary reactors
AlN model verification: CCS 3x2'' reactorAlN model verification: CCS 3x2 reactor
Reaction pathways at different V/III ratiosReaction pathways at different V/III ratios
Low NH3 flow (0.36 slm): TMAl -TMAlNH3 equilibrium shifts TMAlNH3 equilibrium shifts back toward TMAl; growth efficiency is highTMAl concentration
High NH3 flow (6 slm): formation of heavy-molar-mass / low-diffusivity species (i.e. [DMAlNH2]2) followed
AlN t tiby production of AlN vapor and AlN particles
AlN concentration
AlN model verification: CCS 3x2'' reactorAlN model verification: CCS 3x2 reactorEffect of the TMAl flow rate
2,0
2,5 (QNH3=0.36slm)
experiment computation transport limitro
n/hr
Increase of V/III ration results in
1 0
1,5
transport limit
rate
, mic
r
p = 40 Torr
increase of material loss and growth rate reduction
0,5
1,0
AlN
gro
wth
(QNH3=6slm)experiment computationtransport limit
1,82,0
T=1100oC
n/hr exp QTMAl=30mol/min
comp.
Effect of the V/III ratio
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 600,0
A
QTMAl, mol/min
transport limit
1,01,21,41,6
rate
, mic
ron p
exp QTMAl=15mol/min comp.
p = 40 Torr
TMAl
0,40,60,81,0
AlN
gro
wth
AlN Growth rate depends on ammonia
0 2000 4000 6000 80000,00,2
V/III ratio
flow rate
High growth rates of AlGaN in CCS 3x2'' reactor High growth rates of AlGaN in CCS 3x2 reactor (cooperation with TU Berlin)
Additional losses of gallium:i t ti f G t i i
TMGa/TMAl+NH3+H2
hinteraction of Ga-containing species with AlN particles (proceeds in kinetically-
3x2” Close Coupled Showerhead reactor
limited conditions)
Process parameters:Measurements:i it E iR TT DA UV t Process parameters:
Reactor height (h): 6-21 mmTotal flow: 8 slm Ammonia flow: 1.5 slm
in-situ: EpiR-TT-DA-UV systemex-situ: XRD
Pressure: 50-500 mbarTemperature: 1017 C - 1052 CTemplates GaN/Al2O3Layer thickness: 100-700 nm
Target: growth of AlGaN layers with high aluminum content and growth rate
Effect of the pressure on the AlGaN growth rate and Effect of the pressure on the AlGaN growth rate and composition (h=const)
growth rate compositiongrowth rate composition2
25
30
ate,m
/h
1
1.5
tent
,%
15
20
grow
thra
0.5
1
experiment
Alco
nt
10
15
i
pressure mbar100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
experimentcomputation
pressure, mbar100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
5 experimentcomputation
Both growth rate and composition decrease with pressure due to enhanced intensity of particle generation in the gas phase
pressure, mbar pressure, mbar
Data: J. Stellmach et al., Journal of Crystal Growth 315 (2011) 229J. Stellmach et al., presented at ICMOVPE XV, 2010
Effect of the gap height on the AlGaN growth rate and
th t composition
Effect of the gap height on the AlGaN growth rate and composition (p=const)
growth rate composition
504
ent,
%
30
40
e,m
/h 3
Alco
nte
20
30
experiment (SR)experiment (XRD)
grow
thra
t
1
2
5 10 15 200
10p ( )
experiment (PL)computation
5 10 15 200
1 experimentcomputation
Increase of the reactor height results in lowering the growth rate due to particle formation effects, however, the influence on the AlGaN composition is not so
gap, mmgap, mm
, , pstraightforward
Data: J. Stellmach et al., Journal of Crystal Growth 315 (2011) 229J. Stellmach et al., presented at ICMOVPE XV, 2010
Further adjustment of the growth conditionsFurther adjustment of the growth conditions
5 05,5
insitu SR90
100 XRD
growth rate composition
3 03,54,04,55,0 XRD
h = 6mm
(탆/h
)
60
70
80
90
h = 6mm
insitu SR PL
(%)
h=h1
h=h1
1 01,52,02,53,0
owth
rate
(
20
30
40
50
Al c
onte
nt 1
0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,00,00,51,0 Reducing
TMGah = 15mmgr
o
TMAl / (TMAl +TMGa) molar fraction0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,00
10
20Reducing
TMGa
ATMAl / (TMAl + TMGa) molar fraction
h = 15mmh=h2>h1 h=h2>h1
TMAl / (TMAl +TMGa) molar fraction TMAl / (TMAl + TMGa) molar fraction
Reproducible growth of AlGaN in the entire compositional range has been achieved with the growth rate above 3 µm/hachieved with the growth rate above 3 µm/h
Data: J. Stellmach et al., Journal of Crystal Growth 315 (2011) 229J. Stellmach et al., presented at ICMOVPE XV, 2010
High growth rates of AlN in planetary 6x2'' reactorHigh growth rates of AlN in planetary 6x2 reactor
Prediction and explanation of the onset of iti h i t f i V/III ti
Growth rate with TMAl flow
parasitic chemistry for various V/III ratios, involving quite low V/III=1.5
The conditions allowing AlN epitaxy with the 6
7
8
9
H2 = 34 slmm/h
r Exp.
G
The conditions allowing AlN epitaxy with the growth rates exceeding 8μm/h have been
found3
4
52
V/III - 1.5
wth
rate
,
1,6
2,0
/hr
Growth rate variation with ammonia
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000
1
2
Gro
0,8
1,2
1,6
Exp.Comp.h
rate
, m
/
P=100mbar, T=1045-1070oC
TMAl flow rate, mol/min
0 0
0,4
0,8
H2 = 34 slmTMAl = 165 mol/min
Comp.
Gro
wth
Data: Lundin et al., ACCGE 15, 2011, to be published in Journal of Crystal Growth
10 100 10000,0
NH3 flow rate, sccm
Effect of growth conditions on characteristics of
GaN-based quantum-well heterostructuresGaN based quantum well heterostructures
2012
STR G L dSTR-Group, Ltd.
Epitaxy-to-Device Engineering Modeling
H t t tP i Heterostructurecharacterisics
Process recipe
Pressure in the reactor
Growth temperature of cess
I V
Internal Quantum Efficiency
pthe each layer
Variation of precursor flow rates pr
oc
I-V curve
LED spectrum
flow rates
Introduction of growth interruption stages
VP
E
Carrier gas flow rate and composition
MO
V
Dopant supply M
Variation of the growth temperature and precursor supply specified by epi-engineer for growth of LED heterostructure
T Growth interruption and
Quantum well
BarrierEBL
p-AlGaNQuantum
well
temperature ramping Barrier
TMIn
Typical layer structures of
TEGa
Nominal structure, which can be j t d f th t d t t lib ti f th fl t
Typical layer structures of state-of-the-art InGaN-based visible LEDs
projected from the steady-state calibration of the precursor flow rates
Ga, In, Al
Composition profiles in QW, barrier, and EBL in blue SQW heterostructure grown under various
conditionsDuring QW growth, InN fraction does not reach its steady-state value
Intensive Indium desorption during growth interruption results in sharp
conditions
Recipes simulated in growth of Single QuantumWell structure
1 - QW and barrier are grown at constantt t T 750oC QW(750)/G N(750)
0.25
results in sharp decrease of In content in growing layer
temperature, T=750oC: QW(750)/GaN(750)
2 - QW growth followed by interruption (GI) andnext by barrier growth. QW is grown at 750oC.Temperature was ramped from 750oC up to 800oCnt 0 15
0.2
1 Temperature was ramped from 750 C up to 800 Cduring 30s. Barrier was grown at 800oC:QW(750)/GI/GaN(800)
InN
cont
en
0.1
0.15 1
0.05In fraction exhibits the presence of
QuantumWell
GaN barrier
2
Blue SQW LEDthickness, nm
0 2 4 6 80
the presence of indium (In “tail”) in the barrier
Composition profiles in QW, barrier, and EBL in blue MQW heterostructures grown under
various conditionsvarious conditions
Blue MQW LEDA- Quantum Well, B – GaN Barrier, C – AlGaN EBL
0.25constant T = 750 C + ramping (AlGaN)T(barrier)=800 C + ramping
A B C
onte
nt0.15
0.2 3
InN
co
0.1Recipes simulated in growth of Single
0.054
p g gQuantum Well structure
3 – [QW(750)/GaN(750)]x5/AlGaN
thickness, nm0 10 20 30 40 5004 – [QW(750)/GI/GaN]x5/AlGaN
Emission spectra and peak wavelength of SQW heterostructures grown under various
conditions
conditions
Bl e SQW LED0.8
1.0 1 3
(a.u
.) 12
600
Blue SQW LED
0.4
0.6
n Sp
ectr
um
j 100A/ 2
∆λ
550
600
1 3
h (n
m)
12
0 0
0.2
Emis
sion j~100A/cm2
500
k W
avel
engt
h
400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 6000.0
Wavelength (nm)
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104
450
PeakIn comparison with isothermal growth of QW
and barrier (1), the recipe with growthinterruption followed by high-temperaturebarrier growth (2) results in some depletion
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Current Density (A/cm2)of GaN barrier by Indium and as a result in ashift ∆λ of dominant wavelength. Blue shiftwith current is suppressed
I-V curve and Internal Quantum Efficiency of SQW heterostructures grown under various
conditionsconditions1.0
Blue SQW LED
104 0.6
0.8
QE
102
103
(A/c
m2 )
0.2
0.4 1 3
IQ 12
10-1
100
101
1
ent D
ensi
ty (
1
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 1040.0
Current Density (A/cm2)
2 6 2 8 3 0 3 2 3 410-3
10-2
10 1 3
Cur
re 12
Current Density (A/cm )
In comparison with isothermal growth of QWand barrier (1), the recipe with growthinterruption followed by high-temperature2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4
Bias (V)
interruption followed by high temperaturebarrier growth (2) results in some depletion ofGaN barrier by Indium and decrease of forwardvoltage
Electrical-Optical characteristics of MQW heterostructures grown under various conditions
1 0
104
0.6
0.8
1.0 9 10
ctru
m (a
.u) 3
4
101
102
103
10
9 10
y (A
/cm
2 ) 34
0.2
0.4
Emis
sion
Spe
c
j~100A/cm2
2
10-1
100
101
urre
nt D
ensi
ty
Along with positionof dominant wave-
400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 6000.0
E
Wavelength (nm)2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4
10-3
10-2C
Bias (V)600
1 0
of dominant wavelength and blueshift of theemission spectrumwith current the
550
600
8 10
gth
(nm
) 34
0.6
0.8
1.0with current, therecipe specified forgrowth of MQWLED has an effecton LED nonideality
500
Peak
Wav
elen
g
0.2
0.4
0.6
910
IQE
34
on LED nonidealityfactor
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104
450
P
Current Density (A/cm2)
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 1040.0
Current Density (A/cm2)
4
Blue MQW LED
Electrical-Optical characteristics of heterostructures with the samenominal design depend on the recipe specified in MOCVD growth. Inparticular, Indium segregation results in:• Shift of the emission spectra to longer wavelengthShift of the emission spectra to longer wavelength• Increased blue shift of the dominant wavelength with current
Simulations performed demonstrate that the detailed modeling ofdevice structure growth accounting fordevice structure growth, accounting for• unsteady effects like surface segregation,coupled with the
t ti f i t t d• computations of carrier transport, and• light emission spectrais a powerful tool for deliberate control of growth conditions andoptimization of LED characteristics
Th k f ki d tt ti !Thank you for kind attention!