1
BioMed Central Page 1 of 1 (page number not for citation purposes) BMC Neuroscience Open Access Poster presentation Modeling cerebellar learning for spatial cognition Jean-Baptiste Passot* 1,2 , Laure Rondi-Reig 1,2 and Angelo Arleo 1,2 Address: 1 UPMC Univ Paris 6, UMR 7102, F-75005 Paris, France and 2 CNRS, UMR 7102, F-75005 Paris, France Email: Jean-Baptiste Passot* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Recent experimental findings have begun to unravel the implication of the cerebellum in high-level functions such as spatial cognition [1,2]. We focus on behavioral genetic data showing that L7-PKCI mice (lacking LTD at parallel fibers-Purkinje cell synapses) have a spatial learning impairment in the Morris Watermaze (MWM), whereas they exhibit normal performances in the Starmaze, a par- adigm that reduces the procedural demand of the task [3]. These results suggest that cerebellar learning may promi- nently contribute to the procedural component of spatial learning [3]. We model the main information processing components of the cerebellar microcomplex via a large-scale network of spiking neurons. We test the performances of artificial L7-PKCI mice in simulated MWM and Starmaze environ- ments. Importantly, we isolate the purely procedural com- ponent of the learning process by endowing simulated controls and mutants with identical declarative learning capabilities. The model reproduces most of the experi- mental results on the learning impairments of L7-PKCI mice. In the MWM, the mean escape latency and the mean angular deviation between the optimal direction to the target and the actual motion direction of the animal are both significantly larger compared to controls. These dif- ferences are not due to swim capability deficits. Further- more, consistent with experimental data, simulated mutants and controls exhibit comparable learning capa- bilities in the Starmaze paradigm. On the other hand, our simulations cannot reproduce the experimentally observed difference between the goal-searching behaviour of mutants and controls in the MWM (measured by the ratio between the time spent within the target quadrant and the duration of the trial [2]). In fact, our results sug- gest that a purely procedural impairment cannot explain this latter deficit and they raise the hypothesis of a concur- rent declarative learning impairment of L7-PKCIs occur- ring upstream of the cerebellum, e.g. at the level of the hippocampal-cortical interaction. Finally, we address the issue of how multiple internal cer- ebellar models [4] could cooperate to optimize proce- dural spatial learning. We show that our cerebellar network can simultaneously learn an internal representa- tion of the motor apparatus – the forward model – and the online generation of motor-correction signals – the inverse model. We show that the slow learning process undertaken by the inverse model may benefit from the fast learning property of the forward model, which sup- ports the working hypothesis that these two types of mod- els coexist and are functionally coupled in the cerebellum [4]. References 1. Rondi-Reig L, Burguière E: Is the cerebellum ready for naviga- tion? Prog Brain Res 2004, 148:199-212. 2. Petrosini L, Leggio MG, Molinari M: The cerebellum in the spatial problem solving: a co-star or a guest star? Progress in Neurobi- ology 1998, 56:191-210. 3. Burguière E, Arleo A, De Zeeuw CI, Berthoz A, Rondi-Reig L: Spatial navigation impairment in mice lacking LTD: a motor adap- tation deficit? Nat Neurosci 2005, 10:1292-1294. 4. Wolpert D, Miall RC, Kawato M: Internal models in the cerebel- lum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998, 2:338-347. from Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009 Berlin, Germany. 18–23 July 2009 Published: 13 July 2009 BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10(Suppl 1):P141 doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-S1-P141 <supplement> <title> <p>Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009</p> </title> <editor>Don H Johnson</editor> <note>Meeting abstracts – A single PDF containing all abstracts in this Supplement is available <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/files/pdf/1471-2202-10-S1-full.pdf">here</a>.</note> <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2202-10-S1-info.pdf</url> </supplement> This abstract is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/10/S1/P141 © 2009 Passot et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Modeling cerebellar learning for spatial cognition

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Modeling cerebellar learning for spatial cognition

BioMed Central

Page 1 of 1(page number not for citation purposes)

BMC Neuroscience

Open AccessPoster presentationModeling cerebellar learning for spatial cognitionJean-Baptiste Passot*1,2, Laure Rondi-Reig1,2 and Angelo Arleo1,2

Address: 1UPMC Univ Paris 6, UMR 7102, F-75005 Paris, France and 2CNRS, UMR 7102, F-75005 Paris, France

Email: Jean-Baptiste Passot* - [email protected]

* Corresponding author

Recent experimental findings have begun to unravel theimplication of the cerebellum in high-level functions suchas spatial cognition [1,2]. We focus on behavioral geneticdata showing that L7-PKCI mice (lacking LTD at parallelfibers-Purkinje cell synapses) have a spatial learningimpairment in the Morris Watermaze (MWM), whereasthey exhibit normal performances in the Starmaze, a par-adigm that reduces the procedural demand of the task [3].These results suggest that cerebellar learning may promi-nently contribute to the procedural component of spatiallearning [3].

We model the main information processing componentsof the cerebellar microcomplex via a large-scale networkof spiking neurons. We test the performances of artificialL7-PKCI mice in simulated MWM and Starmaze environ-ments. Importantly, we isolate the purely procedural com-ponent of the learning process by endowing simulatedcontrols and mutants with identical declarative learningcapabilities. The model reproduces most of the experi-mental results on the learning impairments of L7-PKCImice. In the MWM, the mean escape latency and the meanangular deviation between the optimal direction to thetarget and the actual motion direction of the animal areboth significantly larger compared to controls. These dif-ferences are not due to swim capability deficits. Further-more, consistent with experimental data, simulatedmutants and controls exhibit comparable learning capa-bilities in the Starmaze paradigm. On the other hand, oursimulations cannot reproduce the experimentallyobserved difference between the goal-searching behaviourof mutants and controls in the MWM (measured by the

ratio between the time spent within the target quadrantand the duration of the trial [2]). In fact, our results sug-gest that a purely procedural impairment cannot explainthis latter deficit and they raise the hypothesis of a concur-rent declarative learning impairment of L7-PKCIs occur-ring upstream of the cerebellum, e.g. at the level of thehippocampal-cortical interaction.

Finally, we address the issue of how multiple internal cer-ebellar models [4] could cooperate to optimize proce-dural spatial learning. We show that our cerebellarnetwork can simultaneously learn an internal representa-tion of the motor apparatus – the forward model – andthe online generation of motor-correction signals – theinverse model. We show that the slow learning processundertaken by the inverse model may benefit from thefast learning property of the forward model, which sup-ports the working hypothesis that these two types of mod-els coexist and are functionally coupled in the cerebellum[4].

References1. Rondi-Reig L, Burguière E: Is the cerebellum ready for naviga-

tion? Prog Brain Res 2004, 148:199-212.2. Petrosini L, Leggio MG, Molinari M: The cerebellum in the spatial

problem solving: a co-star or a guest star? Progress in Neurobi-ology 1998, 56:191-210.

3. Burguière E, Arleo A, De Zeeuw CI, Berthoz A, Rondi-Reig L: Spatialnavigation impairment in mice lacking LTD: a motor adap-tation deficit? Nat Neurosci 2005, 10:1292-1294.

4. Wolpert D, Miall RC, Kawato M: Internal models in the cerebel-lum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998, 2:338-347.

from Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009Berlin, Germany. 18–23 July 2009

Published: 13 July 2009

BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10(Suppl 1):P141 doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-S1-P141

<supplement> <title> <p>Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009</p> </title> <editor>Don H Johnson</editor> <note>Meeting abstracts – A single PDF containing all abstracts in this Supplement is available <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/files/pdf/1471-2202-10-S1-full.pdf">here</a>.</note> <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2202-10-S1-info.pdf</url> </supplement>

This abstract is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/10/S1/P141

© 2009 Passot et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.