Model for World Class University 052

Guidelines for Building World Class University Model for India

Prof. Dr. Rajiv Dharaskar PhD (Computer Engineering)

Director, MPGI Group of Institutes (Integrated Campus)

Mob: +91-7507777501, 8087979393

[email protected], [email protected]

www.dharaskar.com

Round Table Discussion Panel (Directors IIT, IIM, NUEPA, VC, Industrialist, Government Authorities etc.) “Building World Class University Model for India”

At Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University (PDPU), Gandhinagar, Gujarat

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.dharaskar.com/

Few Important Facts1. My Books on World Class Universities (WCU)2. World Class University = Mid Size Global Corporation3. Economic Impact, GDP and WCU4. Contribution of Higher Education5. We Can Afford and Establish WCU6. WCU Can Be Established Within 20 Years7. No Recipe for WCU8. Relation Between World Class Higher Education

System and WCU9. Need Excellent Inputs, Processes and Outputs10. WCU: Role of Private Universities11. About Hong Kong University of Science & Technology

(HKUST)

Contents

12. Guidelines for WCU Model: Iterative and ParallelProcesses of Developing World Class University• Finalize the Financial Model• Develop the facilities and amenities• Global faculty• International Curriculum Design, Pedagogy and Academics• International Students• Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary University• Research University involved in teaching• Industry Interface: Two Way Industry Partnership• Alumni Association• Global Employability• Learning Powered by Technology• Academic Collaboration and Partnerships• Internationalization• Governance• Innovative Culture• Student’s Experience and Learning Beyond Classroom (LBC)• Affordability• Admission Policy• HR Division, International Office, Media and Brand Name Division,

Community Support Division, T&P Division, Support Service &Maintenance Division, Fund Management Division, InternationalAccreditation Division, Physical Education Division, DistanceLearning Division, Finance (Budget and Fiscal Management),Academic Freedom, Motivational and Encouragement Policy,Vocational Education as a Part of University, International TeachingReputation

2/55

Total• Over 1500 References• 1435 Pages

Referred thousands of documents (more than 3

Lakh pages) of more than 50 countries

Download (Free) from www.dharaskar.com

My Books on World Class Universities01

What is the level of complexity?

3/55

http://www.dharaskar.com/

Professor Warren Bennis of the University of Southern California stated that “... running a majorresearch university today is far more complex and demanding than running any global corporation”.

World Class University = Mid Size Global Corporation02

Is it so important? Is it a vital issue for Nation or Region?

4/55

Economic Impact, GDP and WCU03

The education sector contributes about 3% of Singapore’s GDP and provides jobs for more than 57,000 workers. Its GDPcontribution is projected to reach 5% and employment in the sector to exceed 70,000 by 2015.

South Africa's 23 universitiescontributed 2.1% of South Africa'sGDP in 2009http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20140410173250629

The report finds that in 2011–12, the UK higher education sector:• generated over £73 billion of output – up 24% from £59 billion in 2009• contributed 2.8% of UK GDP in 2011 – up from 2.3% in 2007• generated 2.7% of all UK employment and 757,268 full-time-equivalent jobs• generated £10.7 billion of export earnings for the UK• received less than half its income from public sourceshttp://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/highereducation/Pages/ImpactOfUniversities.aspx/#.U28hW42KC00

The University of Birmingham has a major economic impact on the city and region as an educator, employer, researchleader and international gateway. The study shows that:• Generated £1.072 billion of spending in the West Midlands economy in the 2011/12 academic year, a 38% increase since

the 2005/06 study;• Made a value-added contribution of £530 million to the region’s economy;• Supports 11,830 jobs in the region, including a high proportional of highly skilled roles;• Is a net importer of talent to the region;• Acts as an international gateway to the city attracting overseas students, visitors and spending• Attracted £145.5 million research funding in 2011/12 , 87% of the research income received by all Birmingham Higher

Education Institutions and 12% of the region’s total R&D spend.http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/about/our-economic-impact.aspx

5/55


In 2012, the IT sector’s contributionto India's GDP is 7.5%. According toNASSCOM, the sector aggregatedrevenues of US$100 billion. Thissector has generated 2.8 millionjobs, and indirectly employed 8.9million people.http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-05-18/news/31765463_1_growth-rate-india-s-gdp-sachin-pilot

Indian IT sector: US$ 100 Billion, 11.7 Million jobs, 7.5 GDP (India)UK Universities: US $ 100 Billion, 13.6 Million jobs, 2.8 GDP (UK)

6/55

The Internet currentlycontributes 1.6% toIndia's GDP.http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-12-19/news/35912659_1_user-base-million-users-india-s-gdp


Higher Education is one of the most important sector for UK economy.

7/55

Economic Impact, GDP and WCU03 8/55

Contribution of Higher Education04

Without MIT, Harvard, California Institute of Technology, andother such renowned institutions, would America have got itsindustrial, economic, and military might?

Without the IISc, could Banglore have become the globalcentre for microelectronics?

Could the recognition that India got as a responsible nuclearpower have been possible without BARC’s outstandingcontribution to the development of the nation’s nuclearcapability?

Can we do it?

9/55

SN Country Population in

Millions

Area of the

country (square

km)

GDP (PPP)

World

Economy

Ranking $bn

Top 200 WCU

Times HE

Ranking 2012

1. Netherland 16 Millions 41,526 710 (23rd Rank) 12 Universities

2. Switzerland 8 Millions 41,285 362 (35th Rank) 7 Universities

3. Honk Kong 7 Millions 1104 364 4 Universities

4. Israel 7.7 Millions 20,770 248 (49th Rank) 3 Universities

5. Singapore 5.1 Millions 700 327 (38th Rank) 2 Universities

6. India 1241 Millions 3,287,263 4711 (3rd Rank) Not in top 200

Why not India?

Indian Economy can afford WCU.

When small countries can establish WCU, India can definitely do it.

We Can Afford and Establish WCU05

How many years are required?

10/55

The new universities can grow into top quality research institutions within two or three decades whenacademic talent, financial resources and governance - particularly autonomy and academic freedom - arepresent from the start. The 10 successful universities studied in detail reveal how they became great in ashort space of time. They include• Hong Kong University of Science and Technology• Shanghai Jiaotong University in China• Pohang University of Science and Technology in South Korea• the National University of Singapore• the University of Ibadan in Nigeria• Monterrey Institute of Technology in Mexico• Russia's Higher School of Economics• Universities in Chile

WCU Can Be Established Within 20 Years06

How to develop WCU ?

The small countries like Singapore, Malaysia, Korea andHong Kong are having WCU in less than 30 years ofestablishment and the NTU Singapore got the 47th WCUrank in less than 20 years of establishment.

11/55

There is no recipe for World Class University – Prof. Yashpal

No Recipe for WCU08

But I am sure that, the path can be searched, road can be constructed or strategy can be formulated.

What are the challenges ?

For becoming Top Ranking World Class University, each and every inputs, processes and outputs should be excellent.

12/55

In May 2013, the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (University of Melbourne) publishedthe ranking of National Higher Education systems, based on research of data from 50 countries. The ranking issponsored by Universitas 21, a global network of research universities. This gives the comparative strengths andqualities of national education systems around the world. It’s a benchmarking of Higher Education Systems of 48countries. It's important for governments to be able to benchmark how they're doing.

Rank Country Score Rank Country Score

1 United States 100.0 26 Taiwan 56.0

2 Sweden 85.2 27 Malaysia 52.4

3 Switzerland 81.6 28 Saudi Arabia 52.3

4 Canada 80.0 29 Italy 52.1

5 Denmark 79.8 30 Poland 51.9

6 Finland 79.4 31 Greece 50.5

7 Netherlands 78.2 32 Serbia 50.0

8 Australia 77.2 33 Russian Federation 49.5

9 Singapore 76.6 34 Hungary 49.2

10 United Kingdom 74.9 35 Chile 49.0

11 Austria 71.8 35 Ukraine 49.0

11 Norway 71.8 37 Slovakia 47.9

13 Belgium 71.0 38 Bulgaria 47.7

14 New Zealand 69.7 39 Romania 47.5

15 Germany 68.2 40 Argentina 45.8

16 Hong Kong SAR 67.6 41 Brazil 45.6

16 France 67.6 42 China 44.5

18 Ireland 66.8 43 Mexico 42.8

19 Israel 63.8 44 Croatia 39.2

20 Spain 60.5 45 Turkey 38.9

21 Japan 59.6 46 South Africa 38.1

22 Portugal 59.1 47 Thailand 37.9

23 Slovenia 58.4 48 Iran 37.2

24 Korea 57.6 49 India 36.3

25 Czech Republic 56.7 50 Indonesia 35.3

Total 13 Universities, out of which12 are WCU

Established WCU in less than 20 years.2 WCU

7 WCU

Established WCU in less than 20 years.4 WCU

3 WCU

Real Challenge for India

Relation Between World Class Higher Education System and WCU09

The United States doesn’thave a world-class highereducation system because ithas many world-classuniversities; instead it hasworld-class universitiesbecause it has a world-classhigher education system. -Birnbaum, 2007

13/55

SN University Public / Private QS World ranking 2013

1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Private 1

2. Harvard University Private 2

3. Stanford University Private 7

4. Yale University Private 8

5. University of Chicago Private 9

6. California Institute of Technology (Caltech) Private 10

7. Princeton University Private 10

8. University of Pennsylvania Private 13

9. Columbia University Private 14

10. Cornell University Private 15

11. Johns Hopkins University Private 16

12. University of Michigan Public 22

13. Duke University Private 23

14. University of California, Berkeley Public 25

15. Northwestern University Private 29

16. University of Wisconsin-Madison Public 37

17. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Public 40

18. New York University Private 44

19. Brown University Private 47

20. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Public 54

The top 20 US Universities of QS World Ranking 2013 shows that the Private American Universities dominates this list. The75% of top 20 American universities are private and not a single public university in top 20 world ranking, which is shownby grey color.

The private universities can play important role for establishing Indian WCU.

WCU: Role of Private Universities10 14/55

About Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (HKUST)11 15/55

Can we develop the Model WCU ?

About Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (HKUST)11 16/55

Financial Model for Teaching University and “Self-Sustainableand Affordable Multidisciplinary World Class ResearchUniversity”

Neither Government nor Industrialist can provide funding forWorld Class University. For example, the 2013-14 operationalbudget of Harvard University is US $ 4.2 Billion i.e. Rs. 25,200Crore. The entire higher education budget of India is far lessthan this amount.

Inadequate higher education infrastructure and poor qualitycourses are pushing 600,000 Indian students to topuniversities overseas – and are costing the country around US$ 17 billion (i.e. Rs. 102000 Crore) in foreign exchangeannually. That is, Indian students are sponsoring the

operating cost of 4 Harvard like institutes. (6 Harvard like

institutes if you consider Purchase Parity Conversion rate)

Self-Sustainable and Affordable

Multidisciplinary World Class

Research University

Income from Patents

Industry Funding

Alumni giving

Endowment

On Campus Business

Fellowships, Scholarships

Cost Saving Options

Private Equity (PE)

Off Campus Business

Venture Capital (VC)

PPP Funding

FDI Investment

Consultancy Revenue

Premises Rent

Income of Incubation center

Spare Capacity Utilization

Government Research Funding

Government Infrastructure Funding

Foreign Non-Governmental Funding Organization

Donation for Long Term Investment

Foreign Government Funding

International Funding Organizations

Short Term Training Programs

Income from Technology Transfer

E-learning Revenue Generation

Income from Franchise or Licensing

Income from Non-Degree Programs

Income of Innovation centers

International Student Market

Income from Innovation and Creativity Centers

Income from Services offered

Income from Software Development

Teaching

University

Government Grants

Tuition Fees

Hostel Fees

Examination Fees

Building Development Fess

Finalize the Financial Model

Iterative and Parallel Processes of Developing World Class University12

The detailed discussion on this topic is available in my book “FundingTechniques of World Renowned Universities” and Chapter 03 of thebook “113 Difficulties in Developing World Class University”

17/55

The statistics of top 10 Private US Universities (2005)

Columbia University: Per Studentexpenditure / revenue is Rs. 54 Lakh

Research income peracademic staff is Rs. 86Lakh

At Stanford University, approximatelyPer student Revenue / expenditure Rs. 0.97 Crore

Iterative and Parallel Processes of Developing World Class University12 18/55

1. Most of the world-class universities have medical schools. Institutions that have a significant commitment to

biomedical science tend to have a competitive advantage than institutions that are more committed to other subject

areas.

2. Except the private American universities, most of the world-class universities are relatively large, with average

student number ranging from 20,000 to 34,000 and average faculty number ranging from 2,400 to 3,000.

3. Except the private American universities, the number of undergraduate students is much larger than that of graduate

students, with the undergraduate graduate ratio ranging from 1.8:1 to 5.7:1.

4. Except the public American universities, the student faculty ratio is relatively low in most universities, ranging

from 6.0:1 to 10.8:1.

5. Most universities have sufficient administrative and technical personnel to support teaching and research. The

faculty staff ratio ranges from 0.3:1 to 1.1:1.

6. What really distinguishes the top 10 private American universities, which are ranked best in the world, from the rest

of top-ranking institutions is the enormous funds available. The average annual expenditures per student of those

institution reach a hard-to-challenge US$ 148,000 (approximately Rs. 90 Lakh), while the others range from US $

30,000 to US $ 52,000

In UK (2005), the average per

student expenditure of WCU is US $

37000 (Rs. 23 Lakh)

IITs spend Rs 3.4 lakh on a student yearly, while tuition fee is Rs 90khttp://www.business-standard.com/article/management/iit-tuition-fees-just-26-5-of-expense-on-students-113080701177_1.html

In USA (2005), the average per student

expenditure of WCU is US $ 148000

(Rs. 90 Lakh)


The U C Berkeley, Public Universities of USA getsjust 40% from government and tuition fees.They are generating remaining 60% incomefrom various sources.

Only 40% of the totalrevenue is from Governmentfunds and Tuition Fees

Institution

Govt.

budget

Tuition

fees

Endowment

income,

donations,

lottery, and

corporate

support

Competitive

research

funding

Consultancies,

training, and

contract

research

Indian Institutes of Technology,

Mumbai

70 5 5 5 15

Shanghai Jiao Tong

University, China

40 10 5 15 30

Pohang University of

Science and Technology, Korea 6 7 34 47 6

University of Chile 11 23 1 20 45

Pontifical Catholic University of

Chile 11 30 7 4 48

Monterrey Institute of

Technology, Mexico 0 77 13 3 7

Generating 59% to 66% RevenuePublic Funding is just 11%


Research expenditure of U C Berkeley, Public Universities, USA is 27%

SN University Royalty

1. Northwestern University $180 million

2. New York University $178 million

3. Columbia University $147 million

4. University of California System $104 million

5. Wake Forest University $86 million

6. University of Minnesota $84 million

7. Massachusetts Institute of Technology $69 million

8. University of Washington/Washington Research Foundation $69 million

9. Stanford University $65 million

10. University of Wisconsin-Madison/Wisconsin Alumni Research

Foundation

$54 million

11. California Institute Of Technology $52 million

12. University of Rochester $42 million

13. University of Massachusetts $40 million

14. University of Michigan $40 million

15. University of Texas System $38 million

16. University of Utah $38 million

17. University of Florida $29 million

18. University of Iowa Research Foundation $27 million

19. Duke University $26 million

20. University of South Florida $17 million

Country Number of Patents

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Estimate

India 902 1,072 961 1,286 1,430

Israel 1,737 1,899 1,555 1,476 1,452

Italy 2,946 2,883 2,652 2,658 2,671

UK 5,542 5,467 5,044 4,891 4,844

Korea 7,064 7,899 8,035 9,669 10,447

China 5,455 6,120 7,900 12,296 16,406

Germany 17,821 18,855 16,797 17,568 18,568

Japan 27,743 28,760 29,802 32,150 38,888

USA 54,042 51,642 45,627 45,008 48,596

Patent Licensing Income of 2011

PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) international patents by country

The WCU generates significant research revenue.

The Punjab University (PU) is India’stop ranking University (Ranked 225-231 as per Times Higher EducationRanking 2013-14). Dr. Grover, VC of PUsaid that “students enrolling forresearch programmes have no accessto grants. The grants from the centreare limited. Students have to dependon these. Eighty-seven percent of ourfunds go to salaries. Due to this, wecannot give research fellowships,".


SN US University Endowment 2005

(Billion $) Endowment 2011

(Billion $)

1. Harvard University $25.473 $31.728

2. Yale University $15.224 $19.374

3. University of Texas System $11.610 $17.149

4. Princeton University $11.207 $17.110

5. Stanford University $12.205 $16.503

6. Massachusetts Institute of Technology $6.712 $9.713

7. University of Michigan $4.931 $7.835

8. Columbia University $5.191 $7.790

9. Northwestern University $4.215 $7.183

10. University of Pennsylvania $4.370 $6.582

The research on endowment shows that the rate of “alumni giving” is related to age group of alumni. The alumniabove 60 give more donations. Thus the young WCU wouldn’t get huge endowment.


A world-class research university that can play in the best international leagues is an expensive undertaking —to establish and then to sustain. As an example, one large research-intensive new Chinese university costaround $700 million (Rs. 4200 Crore) to build and has a total annual budget of close to $400 million (Rs. 2400Crore)- Philip G. Altbach & N. Jayaram (23 Oct 2008)http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-opinion/towards-creation-of-worldclass-universities/article1362035.ece

…..And decent infrastructure remains a major concern – there is just too little money being put in for buildingeducational infrastructure, as we still seem to believe that higher education needs just modest funding – aninvestment of Rs 200-500 crores for setting a university is viewed as extremely “generous”, when this amountis typically used to construct a high quality building for one department (the CS building of UIUC, GeorgiaTech, MIT, Stanford – which have come up in the last 10 years, have cost in the vicinity of $100 million (Rs. 600Crore))- Pankaj Jalote, Director, IIIT-Delhi (9 May 2012)http://jalote.wordpress.com/2012/05/09/building-world-class-universities-in-india/


At the beginning of the 20th century, the University of Chicago became a world-class institution in two decades and slightly more than $50 million--donated at the time by Rockefeller himself. The price has ballooned, not only because of inflation but because academic institutions have become immensely more complex and expensive. The competition has also become much fiercer. Now, it might take more than $500 million (Rs. 3000 Crore) along with clever leadership and much good luck - Philip G. Altbach (March 2004)http://www.universite-toplum.org/text.php3?id=182

23/55


SN Cost of WCU 2004 2005 2008 2014 India (approximate)

1. Establishment

cost

Rs. 3000 Crore

for anywhere in

world (US $ 500

Million)

Rs. 4200

Crore at

China (US $

700 Million)

More than Rs. 8000 Crore

2. Average per

student

expenditure

Rs. 90 Lakh at a

USA (US $

148,000)

15 Lakh

Rs. 23 Lakh at UK

(US $ 37,000)

Thus operational cost for

10 K students can be Rs.

1500 Crore per year.

Approximate Estimated Cost for establishing WCU

24/55

Iterative and Parallel Processes of Developing World Class University

Develop the Basic facilities, which are at par with globalstandards• Academic infrastructure and facilities• Residential campus• Support services• Service conditions• Security• Library• Medical Facility• Help Desk• Catering Services etc.


Develop the facilities and amenities

12 25/55


The Chapter 8 (pages 186-203) of my book “Strategy to Develop World Class University”covers all the aspects of this issue like• Advantages• Parameters to attract• Techniques to bring global faculty• Brain Gain• Techniques adopted by Indian Universities• International Tactics• Faculty retention etc.

In addition to this, more information is available in Chapter 02 of my book “113 Difficultiesin Developing World Class Universities”



Global faculty

12

Out of total 863 Nobel Prize winners, 33% arewith Cambridge, Chicago and ColumbiaUniversities (11% each).

26/55


The Chapter 12 (pages 292-311) of my book “Strategy to Develop World ClassUniversity” covers many aspects of this issue like• Enhance Global Employability Attributes• Expectation of International Students• Expectation of International Faculties• Flexible and Liberal Credit System• Expectation of Industry (National & International)• Inclusive curriculum • Must address global problems and issues• Credit Transfer facility • Multiple Perspective and Cross cultural capability• Hands on experience • Recent Technology and Development• Interdisciplinary and Trans-disciplinary Approach• Modern Pedagogy• Life Long Learning and Prepare for Last Job• Support for Innovation• Research Orientation• Take care of local and regional needs• Pattern of assessment and evaluation • As per Mission and Vision • Delivery mechanism • Weightage for basic sciences • As per Goals of the discipline• Weightage for social sciences • Way to select subjects of different branches of the same discipline • Multiple Entry Exit options• Way to select subjects of different disciplines



International Curriculum Design, Pedagogy and Academics

Global faculty

My book “Technology Storms Redefining the World Class Universities”highlights the issue like• Missing Post Doc Culture (Section 4.16, page 124)• Objective for Every Course and Training (Section 6.23, page 184)

The following points are covered in my book “Strategy to DevelopWorld Class University”• Develop Your Own Curriculum (Section 1.2.12)• Academic Plan and then Construction (Section 1.2.11)

12 27/55


The Chapter 7 (pages 138-185) of my book “Strategy to Develop World Class University” coversall the aspects of this issue like• Benefits of Admitting International Students• Globalization and the International Student• Aspects of International Student Recruitment Strategy• Student’s Preference for Study Abroad• Intead’s 88 Recruitment Techniques for US Universities• International Student Office at University• Vital Information for Recruitment and Retention• Parameters for International Student’s Satisfaction at Destination• StudyPortals Recommendations Based on Student’s Reviews• Teaching International Students: By University of Melbourne• Best Practices of Social Integration by Universities

In addition to this, more information is available in Chapter 02 of my book “113 Difficulties inDeveloping World Class Universities”




Global faculty

International Students

12

“International students” is US $ 100 Billion Market

Factors Influence on Student Decision Making Process

28/55





Global faculty


Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary University

12 29/55


It should be noted that two more high-performing Russian

institutions would comfortably make the world top 300 but are

excluded from the overall rankings for being too narrowly

focused. Russia has two institutes (Moscow Institute of

Physics and Technology and the Moscow State Engineering

Physics) which have done well in physical sciences in world

rankings, but they are too specialist to be included in the overall

analysis.




Global faculty



12

For detailed information see Sections 6.14 (pages 170), 6.24 (page 184), 6.25 (page

188) of my book “113 Difficulties in Developing World Class Universities”

30/55


The Chapter 11 (pages 265-191) of my book “Strategy to DevelopWorld Class University” covers all the aspects of this issue like• Research University & ROI• Income from Patents• Engineering Research Ranking of Countries• Unlock the Conference Research• Research: Huge Monetary Requirements, How to Manage?• Enhance the Research Culture• Strengthening Industrial Research at University• World Scenario

In addition to this, more information is available in Chapter 04 of mybook “113 Difficulties in Developing World Class Universities”

Ample Research Talent is available in India: On the other hand,

according to a report by management consultancy firm Zinnov

Consulting, the number of R&D enters of multinational

companies (MNC) in India has been increasing at a steady pace,

touching 871 in 2011 as compared to 780 in 2008. The total

amount spent on R&D by the top 1,000 R&D spenders had

crossed $582 billion mark. The total R&D employee base stands

at over 200000 engineers, growing at an average rate of 9% for

the last five years showing consistent growth




Global faculty



Research University involved in teaching

12

Read the British Council Report 2014: Understanding India: The futureof higher education and opportunities for international cooperation

31/55

So wide is the S&T infrastructure in India today that itencompasses S&T organizations under the CentralGovernment, State Government as well as public and privatesectors working in areas as diverse as agriculture andhealthcare on the one hand and nuclear and space researchon the other. Significant contributors are the large number ofinstitutes/undertakings functioning under the CentralGovernment S&T departments. There are about• 200 national laboratories• 200 R&D institutes in the Central Sector and• About 1300 R&D units in the industrial sector

As per DST Report 2011-12: 4533 R&D Institutes





Global faculty




32/55

“India is a developing country with the scientific and technological infrastructure of a developed nation.” —Jack Welch, former CEO, General Electric

India suffers from inefficiency in transforming its S&Tinvestments into scientific knowledge (publications) aswell as into commercially relevant knowledge (patents).

Rafiq Dossani, Senior Economist at the RAND Corporationhighlighted the current scenario of Indian Research in his article inEdu Tech Magazine. He stated that “No Indian university cancurrently fulfill Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan’s (RUSA) termsfor being chosen to be converted to a research varsity”.

India has Research Infrastructure and Research Brains. There is a Need of Effective utilization of resources.





Global faculty




33/55


The Chapter 10 (pages 250-264) of my book “Strategy to Develop World Class University”covers all the aspects of this issue like• AISBL Belgium Report on Industry-University Partnerships• Industry-University Partnership: Interesting Case Studies• Two Way Relationship Activities• India: Current Scenario• WIPO Japan Report: Overall Picture of Industry-University Partnership in India

In addition to this, more information is available in Section 4.5, (page 106), 4.6 (page 108), 8.10(page 231), , 8.11 (page 233) of my book “113 Difficulties in Developing World ClassUniversities”




Global faculty




Industry Interface: Two Way Industry Partnership

12

Read the European Commission Report “30 Good Practice Case Studies In University-Business Cooperation”

34/55


The Chapter 13 (pages 212-254) of my book “Strategy to Develop World Class University”covers all the aspects of this issue like• Role of Alumni in Building the Parent Institute• USNWR University Rankings and Alumni Giving• Super Rich Billionaire Alumni Ranking• University Entrepreneurship Capability Tracking• Huge Endowment and Role of Alumnae• Huge Alumni Associations of Top Ranking Universities• The Art of Alumni Fundraising• Understand the Alumni Giving Model• Formation of Alumni Association• Strengthen the Bond and Develop the Culture• Strategy of Indiana University• Goals of West Virginia University (WVU) Alumni Association• Innovative Activities of Alumni Associations• Challenges of Alumni Association• Future Problems




Global faculty





Alumni Association

12

The world-wide MIT USA community has more than123,000 alumni live in all 50 states, the District ofColumbia, five territories, and in 159 other countries. It isestimated that 25,800 companies founded by MIT alumniemploy about 3.3 million people and generate annualworld revenues of $2 trillion, producing the equivalent ofthe eleventh-largest economy in the world.

The US Universities could raise $400 billionthrough endowment funds. Around 65 USuniversities have endowments over US $1 billion.

35/55


SN Name of University Number

of Alumni

Worth a Total

in Billion $

Total Endowment Fund

up to 2012 in Billion $

1. Harvard University 2,964 622 $30.435

2. University of Pennsylvania 1,502 242 $6.755

3. Stanford University 1,174 171 $17.036

4. Columbia University 889 116 $7.654

5. New York University 828 110 $2.755

6. University of Chicago 658 144 $6.571

7. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 581 172 $10.150

8. Yale University 568 125 $19.345

9. Cornell University 528 60 $4.947

10. Princeton University 508 70 $16.954

11. University of Virginia 499 31 $4.789

12. Boston University 291 38 $1.104

13. Northwestern University 451 36 $7.119

14. University of California, Berkeley 447 72 $3.032

15. University of Michigan 410 70 $7.691

16. University of Oxford, UK 401 51 $5.776

17. University of Southern California 374 66 $3.489

18. University of Mumbai, India 372 37 $0.0127

19. University of Cambridge, UK 361 93 $6.84

20. Brown University 349 23 $2.460

Super Rich Billionaire Alumni Ranking by research firm Wealth-X :The following table shows that 17 universities out of 20 are from USAand only 2 universities are from UK (Oxford, Cambridge). TheMumbai University got the 18th rank. In spite of Indian universitieshaving wealthiest alumni, there is a wide disparity in the endowmentfunds in Indian and USA universities. The reason behind this lies indevelopment of Indian alumni associations. The universities in USAhad developed very strong alumni associations and in India thatculture is missing and this reflects in the gap of endowment funds .

12




Global faculty





Alumni Association

36/55


The Chapter 9 (pages 204-249) of my book “Strategy to Develop World Class University”covers all the aspects of this issue like• Employability based Global University Ranking 2012• Meaning of Employability, Attributes and Strategy• List of Academic Activities to Enhance Employability• Few Examples of Employability and Academic Couture• Employability Attributes Needed in Different Jobs• Strategic Plan of Aberystwyth University (University of Wales), UK• Survey of Brunel University UK• PDP or IDP Links the Employability Skills to Academics• Indian Scenario• Worldwide Efforts• Entrepreneurship Development: Incubation Center

The New York Times released the results of the 2012 GlobalEmployability Survey in which executives from around theworld were asked to rank colleges based on theemployability of their graduates. More than 5,000recruiters, executives and managers representing 20countries identified the 150 universities that they seek tohire graduates from i.e. ranking of universities based onmost employable graduates.




Global faculty





Alumni Association

Global Employability

12 37/55


SN Global Employability Ranking SN Global Employability Ranking

1. USA - Harvard Univ. 51. Switzerland - Univ. Basel

2. USA - Yale Univ. 52. Germany - Univ. Mannheim

3. Great Britain - Univ. of Cambridge 53. Canada - McMaster Univ.

4. Great Britain - Univ. of Oxford 54. Sweden - Stockholms Univ.

5. USA - Stanford Univ. 55. Switzerland - Swiss Federal Inst. of Tech. Zurich

6. USA - Mass. Institute of Technology 56. Canada - Queen's Univ.

7. USA - Columbia Univ. 57. Switzerland - Univ. de Lausanne

8. USA - Princeton Univ. 58. Belgium - Univ. Gent

9. Great Britain - Imperial College London 59. USA - Johns Hopkins Univ.

10. Germany - Goethe-Univ. Frankfurt am Main 60. Great Britain - Univ. of Birmingham

11. China - Peking Univ. 61. Germany - Ludwig-Maximilians-Univ. München

12. Germany - Univ. Heidelberg 62. France – ESSEC

13. France - H.E.C. Paris 63. Switzerland - Zürich Univ.

14. Japan - Tokyo Institute of Technology 64. Belgium - Katholieke Univ. Leuven

15. Great Britain - London School of Economics 65. France - École de Management de Lyon

16. Great Britain - Univ. College London 66. Australia - Univ. of New South Wales

17. USA - Boston Univ. 67. USA - Northwestern Univ.

18. Switzerland - Univ. St. Gallen 68. USA - Georgetown Univ.

19. USA - California Institute of Technology 69. Netherlands - TU Eindhoven

20. France - École Normale Supérieure Paris 70. Great Britain - Univ. of Nottingham

21. USA - Univ. of Chicago 71. Great Britain - Univ. of Manchester

22. USA - Brown University 72. USA - University of Southern California

23. Japan - Univ. of Tokyo 73. Sweden - Goteborgs Univ.

24. Canada - Univ. of Toronto 74. Switzerland - Univ. Bern

25. USA - Univ. of California, Berkeley 75. France - ESCP Europe

26. USA - Duke Univ. 76. Germany - Frankfurt School of Finance and

Management

27. France - École Polytechnique ParisTech 77. Denmark - Univ. of Copenhagen

28. China - Fudan Univ. 78. Germany - Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

29. Canada - McGill Univ. 79. France - Univ. Paris Sud

30. Canada - Univ. of Montreal, H.E.C Montreal 80. Sweden - Karolinska Institutet

31. France - École des Mines ParisTech 81. The Netherland - Rjksuniversiteit Groningen

32. Australia - Monash Univ. 82. USA - Carnegie Mellon Univ.

33. Australia - Australian National Univ. 83. USA - Boston College

34. Spain - Univ. de Navarra 84. China - Tsinghua Univ.

35. India - Indian Institute of Science 85. Canada - Univ. of Western Ontario

36. Singapore - National University of Singapore 86. Netherland - Technische Univ. Delft

37. USA - New York Univ. 87. USA - Cornell Univ.

38. Great Britain - King's College London 88. Germany - Univ. zu Köln

39. USA - Univ. of Pennsylvania 89. Australia - Macquarie Univ.

40. France - Ecole Centrale Paris 90. USA - Univ. of North Carolina

41. USA - Dartmouth College 91. USA - Univ. of Virginia

42. Great Britain - Univ. of Edinburgh 92. USA - Michigan State Univ.

43. Spain - IE Univ. 93. Italy - Politecnico di Milano

44. China - Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ. 94. USA - Arizona State Univ.

45. Usa- University of California, Los Angeles 95. Brazil - Fundação Getulio Vargas

46. Hong Kong - Hong Kong Univ. of Sciences

and Tech.

96. USA - Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor

47. Japan - Kyoto Univ. 97. USA - Purdue Univ.

48. Italy - Bocconi Univ. 98. Sweden - Handelshogskolan i Stockholm

49. Australia - Univ. of Sydney 99. Sweden - Lunds Univ.

50. Germany - TU Munchen 100. The Netherland - Technische Univ. Eindhoven

In Global Employability Ranking 2012IISc Bangalore

is the only institute from India

12




Global faculty





Alumni Association


38/55


My book “Technology Storms Redefining World Class Universities”highlights various aspects of this issue.

The National Educational Technology Plan (NETP) 2010 draft ofU.S. Department of Education Learning namely “TransformingAmerican Education: Powered by Technology” covers lot ofdetails.




Global faculty





Alumni Association


Learning Powered by Technology

12 39/55

Bielefeld University: VR Lab

CAREN VR based Medical Instrument

for Disabled persons University of

Groningen

CAVE-2 VR environment for

Neurosurgeons University of Illinois

Chicago (UIC)

Virtual Reality for Engineering Training,Oklahoma State University, USA

University of Siegen Germany: 3D Lab

Iowa State University: C6 VR Room

Vienna University: Virtual Reality

Training for Upper Limb Prosthesis

Patients

Canadian University Virtual Reality Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood


University of Northampton:

NVision Centre

University of the Western Cape: Department of Applied

Geology VR Hub

DLR German Aerospace Centre: 3D Projection

British Geological Survey: VR Suit

Architectural Project at Engineering School at France

London South Bank University: VR Training for Radiotherapy for Cancer Treatment

Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Germany: HD Visualization Centre

Birmingham City University: Radiotherapy Training

Iowa State's METaL lab develops multiple ways to experience virtual reality

La Universidad Carlos III of Madrid: Real-time Student Feedback

University of Southern Mississippi: AR in Training

Activity


Simulated dental learning environment at UK Dental Colleges

3D Bio-Printer by Hanghou University China Kyoto, Princeton, and John Hopkins

University: Artificial Bones


3D Printer at Kobe University for

diagnose cancer

University of California, San Francisco: Prosthetic Device

Monash University Australia: Centre for Human Anatomy Education 3D Printer Game Changer for Dental

Industry

Heriot Watt University UK: Embryonic Stem Cells

Fraunhofer Institute in Germany: Artificial Biological Molecules

Fasotec, Japan: Print Your Own ... Unborn Child

VisLab at La Trobe University

Remote Laboratory at University of Technology, Sydney Australia






Global faculty





Alumni Association



12 44/55





Global faculty





Alumni Association



12 45/55


From foreign university side there is persistent concern about thebrand dilution and credibility of Indian partner.

From an Indian institution’s perspective there is a lack ofunderstanding of the functioning, needs and segments of foreigninstitutions. This results in poor identification of potential partnersand also loss in opportunities available from partner universities.

Robert Stein and Paula Short conclude that “…collaboration is acomplex phenomenon, especially as one considers the array ofoptions and relationships on the menu.”




Global faculty





Alumni Association



Academic Collaboration and Partnerships

12

The ISB Hyderabad is an unusual example of creating worldclass institute within a decade with the help of InternationalCollaboration and with strong industry acceptance.

The Chapter 15 (pages 364-376) of my book “Strategy to Develop World Class University”covers all the aspects of this issue like• Need of Two Way (Multilateral and Bilateral) Academic Collaborations• One of the Most Successful Academic Collaboration in India• Ground Realities• Strategy for International Academic Collaborations• Issues of Collaboration and Twining / Dual Degree Programs• Public Universities: Coming in a Big Way• Research Partnership Gaining Importance• New forms of international study: International Branch Campus• The Reality

46/55


The Chapter 17 (pages 390-398) of my book “Strategy to Develop World Class University”covers all the aspects of this issue.

In addition to this, more information is available in Chapter 05 of my book “113Difficulties in Developing World Class Universities”




Global faculty





Alumni Association




Internationalization

12

To understand the concept of Internationalization visit thewebsite of Harvard University “Harvard Worldwide”,http://www.worldwide.harvard.edu/iws/facts/

47/55


The Chapter 18 (pages 399-406) of my book “Strategy to Develop World ClassUniversity” covers many aspects of this issue like• Academic Leadership: Yesterday and Today• Difference of Opinion• Far More Complex• More Weight to EQ than IQ• Joined As Subject Expert Not to Become Manager• Need Academic Leaders• Difference between Leader and Manager• Scenario Altogether Changed• Need Leader: Either from Academics or Business• University Needs Managers for Number of Jobs• Management Job in Education Sector: Not Glamorous• The New Trend: HE Leader with Corporate Background• Technocrat cum Businessman having Experience to Grow• Leadership Transition• Need to Address More Diversified Challenges• Who has Experience of Establishing and Growing Something• Optimum Use of Resources• Have to Have Business Skills• Equal Weightage for Internal Candidate• My book “Technology Storms Redefining the World Cass Universities” covers the

issues related to Technology involved in Governance of the university.• In Section 8.8 (page 229) of my book “113 Difficulties in Developing World Class

Universities”, I had covered the issues related to website of WCU.

GovernanceFinalize the Financial Model



Global faculty





Alumni Association





12 48/55


The Chapter 19 (pages 407-426) of my book “Strategy to Develop World Class University” covers many aspects of thisissue like• Innovation in Higher Education• Worldwide University’s Innovation Centres• Classification of Innovations in University Environment• Innovative Teaching and Academics Programme• New types of degrees and courses• Innovation in curricula• Innovation in Assessment• Innovative Pedagogy• Creation of new kind of teaching-learning material• Innovations in teaching and other feedback mechanisms• Innovative Research Programme• Innovative Inter-disciplinary and cross-border research• Creation of research facility that may be useful to other universities & organizations• Innovative collaborations and research networks across institutions• Innovations that take place outside the academia• Innovative research for Local Business and Communities• Organizational Innovations• Entrepreneurship Development• Innovative Diverse Environment through Strategic Partnerships• Innovations in admission process and expanding access• Innovative ways of nurturing Employability Attributes• New ways of increasing the motivation of teachers and nonteaching staff• New models of governance• Innovations in raising funds• Innovative Transparent and efficient ways of monitoring expenditure• Innovative Schemes for Affordable Education• Innovative Exposures to Business, Industry, Administration and Internationalization• Innovative Work Shadowing• Innovative International Exposure to Students• Innovative International Exposure to Faculty• Innovative National Policies of Various Nations• Innovative Faculty Recruitment & Retention Process• Innovative applications of Technology• Indian Government and Industry Initiatives• Global Innovation Index (GII) 2013: India at 66th Position in the World• KPMG Global Technology Innovation Survey: US, China, India

Governance

Innovative Culture




Global faculty





Alumni Association





12 49/55


Governance

Innovative Culture

Student’s Experience and Learning Beyond Classroom (LBC)

• Differentiate Education, Training• Education must be provided inside the classroom and

Training must be provided through “Learning BeyondClassroom (LBC)” activities, which is called “student’sexperience”.

• That is, instead of 8 hours teaching, provide 24x7Learning experience.

• LBC activities should be part of Curriculum




Global faculty





Alumni Association





12 50/55


Governance

Innovative Culture





Global faculty





Alumni Association





12

Education, Training, Exposure, Experience should be part of CurriculumThe LBC activities should include• LBC Activities to Enhance Global Employability• Technology Supported Teaching Learning Outside the Classroom (3rd Book: Technology Storms Redefining World Class

Universities”)• Field Based Learning• Learning Communities• Special Interest Groups (SIG)• Service Learning and Community Engagement• Study Abroad• Experimental learning• Internship programs, Workplace Experience and Job shadow• Undergraduate Research• Entrepreneur Development Activities• Career Exploration• Training Activities (T&P Department)• Women Development Cell (WDC)• Physical Education Department Cell (PEDC)• Learning Resources Centre (LRC)• Innovation Centers• Business Incubation Center (BIC)• Community Development Center• Center of Excellence of Each Department or Discipline• Research Centers of Each Department or Discipline• Student’s Forums of Each Department• Student’s Chapters• Faculty, Staff and Students Clubs• Disability Cell• International Office Activities• Alumni Association• Parent Association

51/55


Governance

Innovative Culture


Affordability

More information is available in Section 3.12 (page 75) of my book “113 Difficulties inDeveloping World Class Universities” and Chapter 4 of my book “Funding Techniquesof World Renowned Universities”.




Global faculty





Alumni Association




Internationalization http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21567373-american-universities-represent-declining-value-money-their-students-not-what-it

12 52/55


Governance

Innovative Culture


Affordability

Admission Policy

More information is available in of my book “113 Difficulties in Developing World ClassUniversities”• Recommendation letter and admission process (Section 8.13, page 235)• Faculty Policy: Faculty Student Ratio (Section 2.3, page 41-44)

The issue of admission policy and technology is covered in my book “TechnologyStorms Redefining the World Class Universities”




Global faculty





Alumni Association





12

Related to admission process, the other important issuesare• Total Student Strength Policy• Admission Policy and UG – PG Ratio

53/55





Global faculty





Alumni Association





Governance

Innovative Culture


HR Division

International Office

Media and Brand Name Division

T&P Division

Support Service & Maintenance Division

Fund Management Division

Community Support Division

International Accreditation Division

Physical Education Division

Distance Learning Division

Finance (Budget and Fiscal Management)

Affordability

Admission Policy

Academic Freedom

Motivational and Encouragement Policy

Vocational Education as a Part of University

International Teaching Reputation

12 54/55

Dr. C. Gopalakrishnan Dean, Nirma University,

Dr. N. V. Varghese Director NUEPA New Delhi,

Dr. N. Ravichandran Former Director- IIM Indore

Prof. N.R. Dave, Vice Chancellor North Gujarat

University Patan, Vice Chancellor Bhavnagar, Director

of Technical Education, Government of Gujarat

Dr. Sudhir Jain Director, IIT - Gandhinagar

Dr. Akshai Agarwal, Vice Chancellor, Gujarat Technological University

Mr. Sunil Parekh, Strategic Advisor, Zydus Cadilla, Jubilant Energy,

President SPICMACAY Gujarat

Presentation of Dr. Rajiv Dharaskar, Director, MPGI

Mr. Palak Seth, Director (Planning & Development) PDPU

Thanks

55/55

Bridging Our Future (long) - YouTube

Documents

Model for World Class University 052