1
Impact Evalua,on Impact was evaluated using an instrumented sphere (TechMark Inc.) on the tradi;onal equipment and on the new one. Figure 3. Instrumented sphere used for impact evalua;on. Impact Trials Impact trials were performed on the sor;ng equipments: Conven;onal and the new one at two different rota;ons: 120 and 180 rpm. Preliminary tests using an instrumented sphere showed impact magnitude lower in the new system. Figure 4. Acelera;on G(m/s 2 ) measured on the two sor;ng equipments: conven;onal and the new one. Worldwide fruit and vegetable producer Harvest is an important step – highly cost. Mainly hand harvest Harves;ng aid equipment – New in Brazil Mobile plaQorm developed in 2008 for harves;ng fresh market tomatoes New prototype for fruits and vegetables Marcos David Ferreira 1 ; Freitas, R. H. S. 2 ; Rocha, M. G. 2 1 EMBRAPA, Embrapa Instrumenta;on, São Carlos, SP; 2 UFSCAR, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION MATERIAL AND METHODS Mobile Pla7orm for fresh market tomatoes Figure 1. Mobile plaQorm for fresh market tomatoes. Trials for harves,ng efficiency and impact Figure 2. Equipment for cleaning, sor;ng and classifying efficiency and impact measurements. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN CONCLUSION Poten;al of use of a new sor;ng system Harvest prototype being developed and new studies will be performed. Mobile plaQorm for harves;ng and processing fruits in Brazil: Evalua;on study for reducing impacts during field sor;ng RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 1 2 3 4 5 Max G RepeJJon CriJcal Points ConvenJonal 120rpm 180rpm 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 1 2 3 4 5 MaxG RepeJJon CriJcal Points New Equipment 120rpm 180rpm

Mobile!plaorm!for!harves;ng!and!processing!fruits!in ... · Evaluaon!study!for!reducing!impacts!during!field!sor;ng !!! RESULTS’AND’DISCUSSION! 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

  • Upload
    vocong

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Mobile!plaorm!for!harves;ng!and!processing!fruits!in ... · Evaluaon!study!for!reducing!impacts!during!field!sor;ng !!! RESULTS’AND’DISCUSSION! 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Impact  Evalua,on      

•  Impact  was  evaluated    using  an  instrumented  sphere  (TechMark  Inc.)  on  the  tradi;onal  equipment  and  on  the  new  one.    

             Figure  3.  Instrumented  sphere  used  for  impact  evalua;on.      

 Impact  Trials      •  Impact  trials  were  performed  on  the  sor;ng  equipments:  Conven;onal  and  the  new  

one  at  two  different  rota;ons:    120  and  180  rpm.              Preliminary  tests  using  an  instrumented  sphere  showed  impact  magnitude  lower  in  the  new  system.          

 

     Figure  4.  Acelera;on  G(m/s2)  measured  on  the  two  sor;ng  equipments:  conven;onal  and  the  new  one.    

   

•  Worldwide  fruit  and  vegetable  producer  •  Harvest  is  an  important  step  –  highly  cost.    •  Mainly  hand  harvest  •  Harves;ng  aid  equipment  –  New  in  Brazil  •  Mobile   plaQorm   developed   in   2008   for   harves;ng   fresh   market  tomatoes  

•  New  prototype  for  fruits  and  vegetables  

Marcos  David  Ferreira1;    Freitas,  R.  H.  S.2;  Rocha,  M.  G.2    1EMBRAPA,  Embrapa  Instrumenta;on,  São  Carlos,  SP;  2  UFSCAR,  Federal  University  of    São  Carlos,  São  Carlos,  SP,  Brazil.    

e-­‐mail:  [email protected]    

INTRODUCTION  

MATERIAL  AND  METHODS  

•  Mobile    Pla7orm    for    fresh  market  tomatoes      

Figure  1.    Mobile  plaQorm  for  fresh  market  tomatoes.    

   •  Trials  for  harves,ng  efficiency  and  impact  

 

         Figure  2.  Equipment  for  cleaning,  sor;ng  and  classifying  efficiency  and  impact                                  measurements.    

   

EXPERIMENTAL  DESIGN  

CONCLUSION  

   

•  Poten;al  of  use  of  a  new  sor;ng  system    •  Harvest  prototype  being  developed  and  new  studies  will  be  performed.  

Mobile  plaQorm  for  harves;ng  and  processing  fruits  in  Brazil:  Evalua;on  study  for  reducing  impacts  during  field  sor;ng  

!

!

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION  

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

110  

120  

1   2   3   4   5  

Max  G  

RepeJJon  

CriJcal  Points  -­‐  ConvenJonal  

120rpm  

180rpm  

0  

10  

20  

30  

40  

50  

60  

70  

80  

90  

100  

110  

120  

1   2   3   4   5  

MaxG  

RepeJJon  

CriJcal    Points  -­‐  New  Equipment  

120rpm  

180rpm  

!