mmii - DTICUWLASIPI mmii on ussuAe8.?-ThUV-OL- IIIII7 Ns-SO IIII III1 ISO IIII1 B2 11L U1.25 OF S A ]6 MCOOYRESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU Of STANDARDS-1 963-A ZLEVEL DNA 5040T-1

A-AOU US8 -~ COW MCLEAN VA PS ISPIgig TmgATK NOLE FORM8 SluWVABILfY AM6 UgTN 56I) -4TC ulOCC 79 a j CARLIN# J 0 WILSON. T A JULIAN PUSU.?I-79-SS

UWLASIPI on ussuAe8.?-ThUV-OL- Ns-SOmmii IIIII7

IIII III1 IIII1 B2ISO

11L U1.25 OF S A ]6

MCOOYRESOLUTION TEST CHARTNATIONAL BUREAU Of STANDARDS-1 963-A

ZLEVEL DNA 5040T-1DOD THEATER NUCLEAR FORCES

SSURVIVABILITY AND SECURITY (TNFS2 )•

COMPENDIUM OF ASSESSMENTS RELATEDoo TO TNFS 2C3 PROGRAM

SVolume I

SThe BDM Corporation

7915 Jones Branch Drive

McLean, Virginia 22102

31 December 1979

Topical Report for Period 27 November 1978-31 December 1979

CONTRACT No. DNA 001-79-C-0090

DTICAPPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; ELECTE.

DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. S APR 2 3 1980

B

THIS WORK SPONSORED BY THE DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCYUNDER RDT&E RMSS CODE B390079465 A99QAXFA10602 H2590D.

Prepared for

Director

C) DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY

* L t,- Washington, D. C. 20305

80 3 14 132

Destroy this report when it is no longerneeded. Do not return to sender.

PLEASE NOTIFY THE DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY,ATTN: STTI, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20305, IFYOUR ADDRESS IS INCORRECT, IF YOU WISH TOBE DELETED FROM THE DISTRIBUTION LIST, ORIF THE ADDRESSEE IS NO LONGER EMPLOYED BYYOUR ORGANIZATION.

ON

'~. .-

UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered)

REPOT DCU INTAION AGEREAD INSTRUCTIONSREPORT DOCU#ENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM

1. REPORT NUMBER l 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER

DNA 5040T-1 itD,,e 34. TITLE (and Subtitle) S. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED

DOD THEATER NUCLEAR FORCES SURVIVABILITY AND Topical Report for Period(TF2 27 Nov 78--31 Dec 79________

SECURITY (TNFS ): COMPENDIUM OF ASSESSMENTS . PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER

RELATED TO TNFS2C3 PROGRAM, Volume I BDM/W-205-79-TR.(Rev)7. AUTHOR(s) C.E. Campbell I- CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERs)R.J. Carlin D.T. Poe R.T. MacOnieJ.G. Wilson W.G. Hwang W.E. Sweeney DNA 001-79-C-0090T.A. Julian A.L. Reese P.H. Dittmer

9, PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT. TASK

The BDM Corporation AREA WORK UNIT NUMBERS7915 Jones Branch Drive Subtask A99QAXFA106-02McLean, Virginia 22102

II. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS Q2. REPORT DATE

Director 31 December 1979Defense Nuclear Agency 13. NUMBER OF PAGESWashington, D.C. 20305 30

14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME 6 ADDRESS(if different from Controlling Office) IS. SECI RITY CLASS (ol this report)

UNCLASSIFIED- 1'Sa. DECL ASSI FICATON/DOWNGRADING

"- SCHEDULE

16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of this Report)

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abstract entered in Block 20, if different from Report)

IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

This work sponsored by the Defense Nuclear Agency under RDT&E RMSS CodeB390079465 A99QAXFAI0602 H2590D.

19. KEY WORDS (Continue on revere, aide if neceeeary and identify by block number)

Communications and Radio Systems Survival GeneralCommand and Control Systems Nuclear ForcesTactical Communications SecurityNuclear Weapons Theater Nuclear Forces

20. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse aide if necessary and Identify by block number)

This volume describes the TNFS2C3 Compendium and indices and indicates how

individual documents in the Compendium relate to specific TNFS2C3 issues..4

DD 1°N73 1473 EDITO.OF1NOVSSOUSOLETE UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Date Entered)

______ 4 / 2k

PREFACE

This compendium of related command, control and communications

(C 3) assessments has been developed to assist the DNA TNF S2 C3 Program

- Manager in the formulation of policy choices for higher level decision.

Each program, assessment and related document identified in the compendium

has been analyzed and correlated with the tentatively identified specific

C3 issues wherever possible. The results of the analysis and correlation

effort have been structured in a format designed to optimize the utility of

the data.

Three attributes of each assessment/document have been high-

lighted:

(1) Date of publication of effort (where appropriate). This provides

a sense of the technological framework within which each assess-

ment/document was completed.

(2) Numerical indication of impact. This empirically-derived judge-

ment provides a measure of the significance of each assessment/

document to the TNF S2 C3 Program. The judgement has been based

on extensive work in the TNF C3 area and comparisons of the

compendium programs/assessments/documents with each other and

with the objectives of the TNF S2 C3 Program.

(3) Applicability to the seven tentatively identified specitic TNF C3

issues. These issues include: U.S. Custodial Commuofications,

Interoperable US/NATO Secure Voice, Jam Resistant Communica-

tions, OPSEC, Physical Survivability and Security, Satellite

Communications, and Restoral/Reconstitution.

Certain assessments or eelated documents because of their scope

and/or objectives have been listed as "Requirements Studies" or "Biblio-

graphies".

The information on each compendium entry will provide the Program

Manager with the means to consider both whether and how best to consider

the results of a particular assessment or related document in formulating

the desired policy choices. The envisioned structure for such formulation

deliberately focuses upon the Program Manager as the key agent in the

process because of the perceived need for a single authority having a

comprehensive knowledge of C3 requirements and the issues arising from

them.

There are a significant number of currently on-going or projected

study efforts or programs the results of which may impact on the objectives

and direction of the TNF S2 C3 Program. These efforts include some of the

more comprehensive approaches such as the ACE Requirements Study, the NICS

II Architecture work, and the activities of the USEUCOM Nuclear Communi-

cations Task Force. In addition, a number of potentially relevant more

specific tactical C3 improvement/upgrade programs are in various stages of

development or implementation. These include:

(1) Joint Tactical Communications Program (TRI-TAC)

(2) Joint Multichannel Trunking and Switching System (JMTSS)

(3) Jam Resistant Secure Communications (JRSC)

(4) Position Location Reporting System (PLRS)

(5) U.S. Army Theater Nuclear Force Survivability (TNF S)

(6) Integrated Tactical Communications System (INTACS)

(7) Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS)

(8) SELREL Improvement Program (SELRIP)

(9) Deployable WWMCCS C3 Capability (DWC )

(10) U.S. Army Theater Communications System (TCS)

(11) Communications Support Requirements - Echelons Above Corps

(COMSREAC-85)

In most cases, it is too early to positively identify or predict

the impact of the various on-going programs on the TNF S2 C3 Program. How-

ever, all of the above programs merit continuing close monitoring by the

TNF S2 C3 Program Manager to identify possible correlation of their efforts

and results with the TNF S2 C3 Program. In those cases where a direct

applicability to TNF S2 C3 Program objectives has been identified, infor-

mation on the relevant program has been included in the compendium. Simi-

larly, where reports or other documents have been produced under such

programs (and it has been determined that these reports/documents have

2

EL _7

potential applicability to the TNF S 2 C 3 Program) the specific reports/documents have been included in the TNF S2 C3 compendium.

As additional program results become available and applicabilityto the TNF S2 C0 Program becomes better defined, each of the on-goingprograms should be reexamined to determine:

(1) How their results can be most effectively integrated into the TNF

S 2 C3Program effort; and

(2) What, if any, steps might be taken to avoid duplication of effort

and better integrate the separate program activities with the TNF

S2 03 Program.

ACESSION for

NTIS w'i e section

tOC Butt section 0

UANN' 'IWM 0JiUs'l i-K" C -- -

...................................

Dist. AVAIL and/or SP'ECIAL

311

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

PREFACE- -l------- --- ---- ---- -- 1

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS--------- --- -- - 5

1 INTRODUCTION AND ORGANIZATION------------ 7

1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE--------- --- 71.2 ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPENDIUM----- 81.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE INDEX -------- 12

2 THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE COMPENDIUM TO THE TNFS2C3 PROGRAM ---- ------- ---- --- 13

2.1 INDIVIDUAL PROGRAM/DOCUMENTRELATIONSHIPS --------- -- ---- 13

2.2 GENERAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PROGRAMS/DOCUMENTS --------- --- --- 13

2.3 DISTRIBUTION OF PREVIOUS EFFORT- ---- 23

Appendix (Published separately as Volume II)

A ALPHABETICAL INDEX TO COMPENDIUM

B CHRONOLOrJCAL INDEX TO COMPENDIUM, COMPENDIUM

OF TNF S2C3 ASSESSIENTS

4

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure Page

1 TNF S2 related compendium format- -- ---- ----- 9

2 Number of assessments addressing- each specific

TNFS 2 C3 issue- -- ---- -------- ----- 24

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

I Relationship of individual programs/documients

of TNF S2C3 assessments--- ----- -------- 14

5

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION AND ORGANIZATION

1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The DOD TNF S2 Program has been undertaken by the Defense Nuclear

Agency to enhance theater nuclear force effectiveness through improved

survivability and security. The command, control and communications (C3)

issues of TNF S2 focus on a variety of operational entities, command and

support functions, political and military requirements, and supporting

communications systems. The specific supporting roles and the communi-

cations requirements vary with the operational circumstances and the

perceived threat.

The objective of the TNF S2 C3 Program is to enhance TNF

effectiveness through near term and long term improvements in the surviv-

ability and security of those US national, non-US national, and NATO

command, control and communications systems and procedures which support

the theater nuclear force. Specifically, the program provides for an

in-depth examination of the survivability and security aspects of those C3

systems and procedures associated with the deployment, maintenance and

employment of theater nuclear forces. The basic concept and overall

approach of the TNF S2 C3 Program provides for early identification of

issues and the testing of potential technological and procedural

improvements.

This particular report has as its purpose the identification and

analysis of relevant C3 programs and assessments conducted outside the TNF

S2 C3 Program in order to determine their applicability to TNF S2 C3 Program

objectives. The study is comprised of two parts:

(1) Identification of TNF C3 programs and assessments, and

(2) Analysis and correlation of the identified assessments to the TNF

S C Program.

Each report or document which has been identified has been evaluated in

terms of:

(1) How it may impact on the TNF S2 C3 Program;

(2) The significance of its contents with respect to TNF S2 C3 Program

objectives and issues; and

RAM

I

(3) How relevant results of past, ongoing, or future assessments may

be integrated into the TNF S2 C3 Program.

This volume contains the results of the evaluation process described above.

The compendium listing the relevant C3 program/assessments and related

documents is published separately as an Appendix to this report to facili-

tate its intergration with the existing TNF S2 Compendium.

1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPENDIUM

Each assessment and document which has been identified and

included in this compendium has been described in terms of: its bibliogra-

phical information, a TNF S2 Related Compendium code letter and C3 code

number, and an abstract of the document.

1.2.1 Bibliographical Information

Each entry in this compendium should contain the following

bibliographical information:

(1) Title of Document,

(2) Contractor/Agency Author and Location,

(3) Technical Report Number (or Access/Log Number),

(4) Contracting Agency and Location,

(5) ContracL Number,

(6) Date of Document,

(7) Classification of Document

(8) AD Number (if DDC document) and

(9) Distribution (Limited, etc.)

In some cases an entry may not contain all of the aforementioned bibliogra-

phical data because complete information was not available or because the

project is ongoing. These entries were retained in the survey to keep the

compendium as comprehensive as possible. The missing data will be compiled

as it becomes available and will be included in future revisions of this

document. Figure 1 depicts a sample worksheet format that can be repro-

duced for the purpose of submitting additions to the TNF S2 Related Com-

pendium.

8**

Title of Document:

Contractor/Agency Author and Location:

Technical Report No. (or Access/Log No.):

Contracting Agency and Location:

Contract No.:

Date of Document:

Classification of Document:

AD No. (If DDC Document):

Distribution:

CODE:

1 SUMMARY:

Figure 1. TNF S2 related compendium format.

9

1.2.2 TNF 52 Related Compendium Code Letter

The TNF S2 Related Compendium Code Letter indicates the various

TNF S2 C3 Program areas a particular source addresses. The TNF S2 Related

Compendium categorizes data sources according to their relationship(s) to

the following areas of overall program concern:

(1) Threat, CODE LETTER: A

(2) C3, B

(3) Security, C

(4) Survivability, D

(5) Theater Nuclear Force, E

(6) Simulations and Models, F

(7) Testing, and G

(8) Miscellaneous. H

1.2.3 TNF S2 C3 Code Number

All of the programs and documents included in the TNF S2 C3 Pro-

gram compendium (Appendix B) have been identified with a TNF S2 Related

Compendium Code Letter "B" indicating a relationship to the general C3

area. Where appropriate, additional general INF S2 areas have also been

identified.

To further assist the reviewer in identifying the information

available in a particular report or document source, each entry in Appendix

B has been assigned a C3 code number in addition to the code letter "B".

The C3 code number indicates a relationship within the general C3 area to

one or more of the following more specific areas of TNF S2 C3 Program

concern:

(1) Threat to C3 CODE NUMBER: 1

(2) Security of C3 facilities* 2

(3) Survivability of C3 facilities 3

(4) C3 Requirements 4

(5) C3 Modeling and Simulation 5

(6) C3 Testing 6

Therefore, a B.5 code entry in Appendix B, for example, would

indicate that the entry relates to the general C3 area and in particular to

10

I

the modeling and simulation of C3 systems or networks. Similarly, a B.3.4

entry would indicate a particular relationship to survivability issues for

C3 facilities as well as C3 requirements.

The scope of the related area indicated by each of the TNF S2 C3

code numbers is as follows:

(1) Threat to C 3. (Code number 1) This area encompasses considera-

tion of the complete spectrum of threats to C3 systems and pro-

cedures including sabotage, terrorist actions, electronic warfare

(including direction finding and jamming), COMSEC and OPSEC

procedures, conventional attack and nuclear weapons effects.

(2) Security of C3 facilities. (Code number 2) This area includes

consideration of vulnerabilities and corrective actions which

would impact on the security of C3 facilities and which could

have an impact on the overall effectiveness of the theater

nuclear force. It includes considerations of protective measures

to enhance security (such as provision of improved alarm systems

or reinforced guard forces).

(3) Survivability of C3 facilities. (Code number 3) This area

includes consideration of vulnerabilities and corrective actions

which would impact on the survivability of C3 facilities and

which could have an impact on the overall effectiveness of the

theater nuclear force. It includes consideration of such mea-

sures as increased hardening and the use of multiple paths and

interlocking networks.

(4) C3 Requirements. (Code number 4) This area includes considera-

tion of C3 facilities, systems and procedures required to support

the four primary functions of the TNF: Deployment; Employment;

Storage, Maintenance and Security; and Readiness and Reliability.

It includes establishment and analysis of information need lines

and communications connectivity requirements.

(5) C3 Modeling and Simulation. (Code number 5) This area includes

consideration of modeling and simulation activities conducted to

assess the capabilities and limitations of the C systems, net-

works, and procedures which support the TNF. It includes digital

E11

and hybrid simulations designed to represent C3 equipment or

systems under realistic conditions.

(6) C3 Testing. (Code number 6) This area includes consideration of

the results of C3 test programs which could have an impact on the

objectives of the TNF S2 C3 Program. It includes both direct and

indirect test results.

1.2.4 Document Abstract

The third part of each entry consists of an abstract of the

document which indicates the scope and type of information contained within

the data source and, where appropriate, a summary of key results.

1.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE INDEX

Two indices are provided for the user's convenience. The first

index is an alphabetical arrangement of the program/document titles with

appropridte code entries and page numbers. The second index is a chrono-

logical arrangement of the program/document titles with the most recent (or

on-going or projected) program/documents being listed first. Again, the

appropriate code entries and page numbers are provided. These indices are

located in Appendix A and B, respectively, in Volume II.

12

S

I*

SECTION 2

THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE COMPENDIUM TO THE

TNF S2 C3 PROGRAM

2.1 INDIVIDUAL PROGRAM/DOCUMENT RELATIONSHIPS

Table I depicts graphically the relationship and relevance of

each document included in the compendium to the TNFS 2 C3 Program. The

potential impact and significance of the results of a specific assessment

or related document are represented by a numerical value on a scale of 1 to

10 in the "Impact/Significance" column. The larger the number, the greater

the relevance to the TNFS2 C3 Program. The impact/significance number also

reflects the age of the information. For example, a designation of five

indicates an assessment or related document containing old but still useful

data. Numbers above this level reflect increasing utility both in terms of

how recently the assessment was completed (if not currently on-going or

planned) and in the degree of detail and scope of the pertinent infor-

mation. Numbers between I and 4 generally indicate older assessments which

contain data which may be useful primarily in the development of a current

oaseline including capabilities and deficiences.

2.2 GENERAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PROGRAMS/DOCUMENTS

The entries in the "Specific Issues" columns in the table are

related to the previous technical report in this series. The "Specific

Issues" entry indicates relevance to the specific C3 issues which have been

tentatively identified. The "Index" column refers the reader to the appro-

priate page of the compendium. The indication that a particular document

addresses one or more specific TNF S2 C3 issues does not indicate that

either the scope or detail of the relevant discussion in that document

meets some predetermined standard. Consequently, there may be marked

differences among a group of documents in the amount of information each

contains on a given issue which the table indicates each document addresses

in common with several others in that group.

13

W Pi

Table 1. Relationship of individual programs/documents to

TNF S2C3 issues.

PROGRAM /DOCUMENT TITLE

MINUTES DNA PROGRAM.ZNDINCA COORINATION MEETING 8.2.8 2 **INTEGRATED TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM, TASK IV, 8-211 2

REFIEBES ALTERNIATIVE MAYF COMMUNEICATIONS CONCEPTS

AN OVERIVIEW Of HF COMUINICATIONS IN A NUCLEAR 112114ENVIRONMENT

NUCLEAR VULNKAILITY ASSESSMENT OF TACTICAL SHIP- 9-2.1 SBOARD ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS

ANALYSIS OF THE 1R45 TACTICAL NUCLEAR LAND SATTLE 8-2.48 4 IREOUIREMENTS STEOYI

U.SS. BLUE RIDGE (LCCII COMMUNICATIONS EFFECTIVENESS B2.52 3EVALUATION

INTRODUCTION 10 NUCLEAR WREAPONS EFFECTS ON NAVAL 1121 RIHit" FREOIIENCY COMMUJNICATIONS SYSTEMS 0

TACTICAL SATELLITE COMMUINICATIONS COST EFFECTIVE 8-2.24 5NESS ANALYSIS STUDY ITACIIATCOMI,VOLOIEE it. APPENDIXU. THR EAT TO U 1. ARMY COMMUNICATIONS

* UINICATIOUS ELECTRONICS-7SICE-75). FHASE I, FIELD 8.2.22 4ARMY. VOLUME 4. ARNEX f COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMSCONCEPTS

INTEGBATED NUCLEAR COMbUNICATIONS ASSESSMENT. 5.2.31 5PHASE I REPORT

NAVAL TEEIECONMNICATIOIS SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE. 8.2.50 5 (REOOIBEMENTS TUOYI

ANALYSIS Of TYYFICAL THEATEB ARMY CDMMUNICATION 1.2.46 5LINKS U AONLIA11 ENVIRONMENT

Sw 8NM VULNEBFA8EITY AND SUBVIVASILITY STUDY, 6-0.82 4

MINUTES. DNA INCA PROGRAM. IR" COOROIRlATION ot, 11TRK 2112 4

E UROPE AN TEEATENA NUCLEAR FORCESEC3ESYTEMSSTUDY. 8.2.48 6 (BEOUIB EME11TDETUOYI

FINAL REPORT

MIUE. BINA INICAMPOSRAM. 1111 COORINATION MUETUB 5-2.8 A

SAV TACTICALNBDCLBANAMAPONOSTUOY, VOLUME1 52.04

MINUTES DNA INCA PRORAM, 411N COORDINATION MEETING 1251 3

MINUTES 0NA INCA PROGRAM, 300 COORDSINATION MEETING 82889 2

PROTECTION ofE~ RICS"owNUSEICLEAR tPLDOn 1-2.12 1

EFFECTS0

1 2OA/I79W

14


TNF S2C3 issues. (Continued)

PROGRAM / DOCUMENT TITLE S U

f

MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK 5219 6SYSTEM ENGINEER

JOURNAL OF DEFENSE RESEARCH. VOLUME S. N0 4 9218 3

IMPROVING THE EFFELTIVENESS OF NATO'S THEATER NUCLEAR 9239FORCE

ANALYSIS OF TWO-WAY AND REPORT BACK THEATER 5.51 4COMMUNICATIONS

COMPARISON OF SOVIET ARE US. GROUND FORCE CAPABILITIES 1.228 AIN ELECTRONIC WARFARE. VOLUMES I AND R AND EXECUTIVEaRIEFING

MINUTES. DNA INCA PROGRAM. BTH COORDINATION MEETING 1.2.33 4

EUROPEAN COMMAND. CONTROL, AND COMMUNICATIONS STUDY A217 5GROUP. FINAL REPORT

NAV C3

STUDY -243

INCA PROPAGATION PATH EFFECTS ASSESSMENT FOR SATELLITE 52.79 4AN TROPOSCATTER COMMUNICATIONS IN THE TACTICALTHEATER

COLLECTION AND PROCESSING OF INFORMATION PERTINENT TO B221THE TACTICAL NUCLEAR BATTLEFIELD

IMPACT OF SABOTAGE ON OCS FACILITIES. PHASE I S..1 N

IMPACT OF SABOTAGE OR MANNED UCS FACILITIES, TASK I, 213

SURVEY AN ANALYSIS

IMPACT OF SABOTAGE IN MANNED DCS FACILITIES, TASK 2. R2COST BENEFITS ANALYSIS

MULTIPLE SYSTEMS EVALUATION PROGRAM, FINAL REPORT ON US R IREOUIREMENTS STUDY)CRITICAL COMMUNICATIONS FOR TACTICAL NUCLEAR DELIVERYSYSTEMS

ASSESSMENT OF RCA.TOTHSATER C3

SYSTEMS 524 1

SHAPE C2 SUOVIVABILITY SUPPORT PROGRAM 2 7

BLAST EFFECTS ON USWEAPOS SYSTEMS. VEHICLE SYSTEMS. 52E0AND CS EOUIPMERTNUCLEAR WEF APONS EFFECTS VULRERABILITY TESTS 21 8

DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC VULNERAILITY INFORMATION N.. 1SURCES

, 15

Table 1. Relationship of individual programs/documents toTNF S2C3 issues. (Continued)

PROGRAM /DOCUMENiT TITLEA- 2

IIIVESTIGATION OF THE VUL1NGRAITY/SURVVAIIT OFI21SYTEMS SUPPORTINEG THE INCA DECISION ROCESS

NET TECHNICAL ASSMIUENT: IPAVT OF SW ON TARGEYKILL 652ROLES AT U.S. BRIGADEISOVIET REGIMENTAL LEVEL o

MINUTES, SEA NCA PROGRAM. 10TH COORDINATION MEETING 6216 4

INTEGRATED TACTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN STUDY ES RU0 S REaUIAGMENTS STUDY)

ELECTRONIC WARFARE VULNERABILITY OF U.S. ARMY N-ZAM ISELECTED OVERSEAS TACTICAL UNITS * 0

MINUTES, DNA 1INCA PROGRAM. ITH COORDINATION MEETING U 2.94 4

EMP ASSESSMENT FOR ARMY TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS 62.1 4SYSTEMS. TRANSMISSIONI SYSTEMS SERIES 110.1I- RADIOTERMINAL SET AN1TBC 146

EST-VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS OF RAIO SETS A1iPRC-I7. E..3AN, VECR., ANE AR(GRC-16H

ARCHITECT UP[ FOR TACTICAL SWITCHED COMMUNICATIONS 12.75 1 IREOUIRiEMERTS STUDY)SYSTEMS

EVALUATION OF SURVIVANILITY/RECOVERAIILITY NSPECTS 62.65 ?0 THE OCS SYSTEM CONSUBIL

IPACT OF 90 WITEOAGMBCE US 911101S LOVE I COMBAT 5B2.E 5

U.S. FORWARSI AIR DEFENSE EWN'&RAAEILITY 6.2.31 0 *PROCEEDINESF THE TW6ftV.UCOND ANNEAL JOINT 6-24N 4ELECTRONIC WARFARE WPERElNCU. VOLUME1 I 0

EUBOPSAB Des UBRV9NA6LITY !ENHANCEMENTS STUDY 11-2.114 1 (REOUIINTS STUDY)

EPPRETIVENESS OF HABOUBIROSHIPSVELUMI.EXECUTIVE 65204101. Y

EFFECTIVESS OF MARUGINN SNIPS. VOLUME 2 -2.61 1

US. NAVY SATELLITE COMUNICATIONS VULNERILITY: Ea 2.0INITIAL ASINT OF THEVULONASILITY OP SATELLITE!COUPINICATIONS TO INCEPT. seEOPOSIIONIB. ANgEXPLOETATION THERIUGH lIBE

JOINT BATTLEFIELD NUCLEAR OPTION PROCEOURESBTUOV BORN8 1

1 120A/79W

II 16

-71



SPECIFIC ISSUES

PRIOGRAMI DOCUMENTT?IE

THEME~~~C R U L ARW'ANE

REOUIIEEM 'ITS AlSO SOLUTIONS FOR DACO LLCTIO N A ELE 1.11 1 fRERStIEEfiffS STUDY)TREAEERESSCLLAARWAR.AARM11)(11

SVE T OttC THREAT TO Tiff.VOLUME 11 INAL REPORT .2614 0 @ 0 40AfTACC& -'RFORIWASCE ili AS EIN E NVIOIIIAit, fKAM 1, 2,.11 7FIRAI. REPORT @

AFCEATEUFOSIIM "INTERNATIONAL INTEROPERASIITY. 11,122 6

CommRilATIOms, COMANG AND CONTROL"

JOURNAL OF DEFENE REROANCIC TACTICAL C) 3.2.44 5

IMPACT Of SELECTED COUNITER Cl OPERATION$SON SOVIIET 3.2,19 5ITACTICAL MIRSIoll EFFECTIV/FEESS

ANNUAL DEFENSE REPORT FOR FY$9?9 I21

INEITIAL VUL*ERAIILIE' ASEEU!tl Of EXISTING AD lilts 114'" ASTAGE I COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY

COMIMAND. COINTROL, ANDC OMMUNICAT1IN FOR US. 82.122 4THEATER NUICLEAR FORCER IN PACOM

INFORMATION REQIREMENTS FOR TOE CONVINTIONALI S21* IREOUIAEMERS STUDY)NUCLEAR IATTLEFIELD I

OtFER$SENCE 1110EAR AS *Ot Ott THEATER NUCLEAR 114,124 # IF41OOiJREMENTS STODY)FORCES RESEARCH ARC, REVELOPWRT REQUIIREMENTS

EUROPEAN THEATER ANALYINS. APPENIX A. 111111 CENARIO, 12 120f INATO FORCES0

1 1OPERATIONAL. CONCEPTS FOR THE RNUCLEAR TOMAHAWK 911% 1S FRIRI EMEIi~ TRSTSOFiGR)1UAR LAUN CHED COIE m4sRLE I I

FIR10 ARTILLERY ORGAIZATION AND SYSTEM REROURIARERTS. 11Z21 4 (REQEIARIMETSTEOyiw 414m3 VOLUMNE InISK 54lIME FRAME

JOINT TEST Of VIILRERASUiTfY Of IE. TACTICAL DATA LIANS. 64212812

04:1441 oEffIRITEGR HRASE 4

I 120A/7gIW

17


T!IF S2C3 issues. (Continued)

PROGRAM) I OCUMAEAT TITLE *

WWMCCS ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVES FOR THEATER NUCLEAR 1-2.117 7 IREOVIREMENTS STUDY)

WAR. SIXTH REPORT. VOL UME [, EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW ANDARCHITECTURAL SUNIMARY

WWMCCS ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVES FOS THEATER NUCLEAR R2118 7 (HEDUIREMNT STUDv).WAR, VOLUME 2. ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVESI I I

CANDIDATE @ROAD ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVES AND 1-2.119 7 (REQUIREMENTS STUDY1

DECISION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE WwMCtS. SOUTH REPORT.

IMPLICATIONS(OS TACTICAL SATTLE1.0L SITUVATONS AND SO2. 2 7 REOUIRIET STUDY)

SYSTEMS DR THE REQUIREMENTS FOP THE MWRCCS

ARCHITECTURE I I I"'I. CU ARCHITECT)'RAL ALTERNATIVES AND DECISION 1-2.121 7 IREQUIRDH......SISSY)

CONSIOIRATIOS FOR CRISIS SITUATIONS. EIGHTH REPORT I I IIDENTIFICATION SF SOME TOPICS FORAFPROPOSED PAPA 82.23 2 IRDOUIREMENTS STUDY)

TACTICAL WARFARE STUDIES PROGRAM

SOVIET CAPAEILITY TO CONDUCT ELECTRONIC WARFARE ES2.121 HAT AINST -3S SPACE SYSTEMS0 0

ECCM FOR DEFENSE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (OCS) 1-2.141 7

WARSAW PACT SIGNAL IN:T!LLIG ENCE AND ELECTRONIC 1.2130 VWARFARE THREAT TO SOUROUNE FORCES

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE EtCH LAUNCHI CONTROL 1.2.137 UCENTER

ANTI JAMPOLICY STUDY. FINAL REPORT, VOLUEME11. ANTO-JAM 12.148 RREQUIREMERTS

ECCMIFOREOCO EZ2.1R 7

TASE TR'I R1 CDMMA)NICATIONS. COMAND ANE CONTROL. R.D14 0I NiRtouloltmifTS37uovlFINAL REPORT I I I

RATS INTEGRATED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM STASH 11 111461 I)EGUIKEVENTS STUDY)ARCHITUNE. VOLUME II (PLUS ANNESESI

RATIONALIZATIO /STANOAROIZATIRR WITHOIN NATO. FIFTH ES~t tRECOEP RE1PORT"TO THU CONGRESS

MALLARD I VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS N.-SI4S 1

I IA SI.D.JITMLIHNE TRUNING AND 812A.8 7 (REQUIREMENTS STUDY)

SITCHING SYSTEM IUMAALYSS IRPLAN 41421- - -I I11l2OA/711101

18

- .. 0.6


TNF S203 issues. (Continued)

PRiOGRAM/ DOCUMENT TITLE

JMTSS MARAGEMENTIEMKEMENTF.TIGN PLAN. SECOND DRAFT *.2JS a (REQUJIREMENTS STUDY)

GROUND MOILI FORCESSATELLITE COIMM016ICAliONS. VOLUME 1.2.148 7 IREOUIREMERTE STUDY)

I. OPERATIONAL CONCEPTSI I

GROUND MOOILE FORCE SATELLITE COMMIUNICATIONS. VOLUME El 141 7 (NEOUIREMEEITS STUDY)HI. CONTROL CONCEPTSI

I

I)I0CLEARI CDIJNICATIOI1MBI FORCE 1NCTAF) REPORT 1-2.143 I REQUIREMENTS STUDY)

OPERAIONAL CONCEPT FOR THE NCTAP PROPOSED COMMIII 062.14 9

CATIONS ENHANCEMENTS 0 0 g

ALLIED COMAND EUROPE (ACE)INUCLEAR COMMAND 1-2.51 I REGDIREMENTS jTIJIS CONTROL IMPDOVEMNT~ PROGRAMj

ED EUCOM COMMARD AND CONTROL SOLUTIONS 0.2.10 a (REQUIREMENTS STUDY)I IDEVELOPMENT OF SCOPE FOR IMPROVING THE DURVIVABILITY1 8-2.11 1 IREOUIRDERERTS STUDY)

SECURITY OF THE THEATER NUCLEAR FORCE I IMMMCCS ARCHITECTURAL PLAN. ELEVERTH REPORT 6.2.12 F RES EREUETS STUDY)

TACTICAL COMMAND ARE CONTROL SYSTEM INTERCEPT 6-2.133 3VULIERABILITY ANALYSIS, VOLUME 1. INTRODUCTION ARESUMMARY

AR ASSESSMENT OP TRE TECHROLOGY P0R CONTROL OF FORCES ES .114 3AND WEAPONS OR TRE IIATTLEPIELD. IRTE RIM RE PORT

IMPROVING TACTICAL COMMAND AID CONROL 1R CERTRAL 3.2.13O 4 IREDUIREENTS STUDY)EUROPE

TO&O OF TAC CONSEC SYSTEM. RED FLAG Ti7 B-h 012I

LAUNCHI CONTROL CENTER COMEICAYIONS STDYO 8-.61 7 REIIEET STUDY)

CENTRALIZED C IN NIATO. FORCE MULTIPLIER DR SHORT7 1.1101 ICIRCUIT?

11 20A/79W

19



PROGRAM]I DOCUMENT7 TI7E

ANALYSIS OF BASELINE TACTICAL C3

VULNEIIAIII ITY IN A 112.113 aNtUtitEAR ANVI"OIIME7

SURVIVABILITY AND EM-LOYMENT OF TAZICAL NUCLEAR AND 9 ZA2CONVENTIONAL AIRPOWENA IN CENTRAL NATO. PHIASE I

NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY AND VUILNERAII.7Y OF NAVAL CS BN.45 RISYSTEMS IN EUROPEAN TIIEATE R OPERATIONS

PACIFIC SATELLITE COMMUINICATIONS EMP SURVIVABILITY B-2461 5

TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNTIER.CDUNTER MEASURES PON 8-2.67TACI(CAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS0

NTA TACTICAL AIR SUPPORT OF U.S. FORWARD AREA GROUND 8.2.4 5COMMANDERS IN AN EW ENVIRONMENT7

EMF ASSESSMENT PUN ARMY TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS aI SA4

SYSTEMS: TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS SERIES NO. 2. RADIO0TERMINEAL SET ANITRC-117

REQUIREMENTS FOR U.S. EUROPEAN C3 SUPPORT N-S 21 1(RFS UIREMENTS STUDY)

I ItUROPS AN C3 IMPLEMENTATION STUD Y, FINAL REPORT RSE4 A (NEQUIREMERTSSTEAIT

ADAPTABLE NF COMMIUNICATION SYSTEMS FOR USE IR1A 9.2 110 3NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENT

AIR DEFENSE MATERIE L EMP VULNERA81iLrY SURVEY OF 12.57 AARF v TACTICAL SYSTEMS

CENTRAL REGION AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL. INFORMATION 8-2.111 1 ISin ENTSTUDY)FLOW ANALYSID. PART I I I

61111tRAL REGION AIR COAND AND CORTROL. VOLUME %I $2.112 ? (REQUIREMENTS STUDVI

SECURITY AND SURVIVABILITY Of ?NEATER NUCLEAR 112.113 IFWEAPONS LOGISTICAL SUPPORT CAPABILITIES. DRAFTFINAL REPORTI 1

A DISCUSSION OF ISSUED OF TACTICAL NUCLEAR WARFARE 92.114 5 3EIIEAWSTIT

I ITNPF 12 COIINECArTOSPOEINAWM*ANAGEMENIT PLAN 8.2.11E 1 (REQUIREMENTS STUDY)

I IIBLIOGRAPHY OP RSA REPORTS ON TACTICAL PROGRAM N-SUE9 N 41INLIOSRAPNYI

1 120A/79W

I . . ,20

Table 1. Relationship of individual procjrams/ documents to


SPECIFIC ISSUES

PROGRAM / DOCUMENT TITLE 4~. C,:g,

NUCLEAR SUIRVIVABLE C2

SYSTEM 1-2.7 1

ASSESSMIENT Of THE IMPA-T OF SURVEILLANCE AN" ELECTRONIC 8.2.8 BWARFARE SYSTEMS ON COMSAT OPERATIONS

AFWWMCCS EW. PHASE 11, FINAL. REPORT B-2.97 7

SOVIET GROUND FORCES COMMAND. CONTROL. AND COMEIUNI- 6-2.1CATIONS SYSTEMS AT THE TACTICAL LEVE L

COMMANOW CONTROL AND C OMMUNICATIONS FOR US NATO B-2.8 3TREATER NUCLEAR FORCES

1WRVU1NORASH.LIEY AD tOMEC POSTURE OF CS Of PERSHIING 3-2.73SYSTEM

ASSE SSMENT AND MODIELS OF MOBILE COMMAND POST B-2.29gSURVIVABILITY IN A TACTICAL NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENT.0DRAFT FINAL REPORT

RE RESINTATIVE COMMANT POST CONFIILGRATIONS C3 -2.41 11STRUCTURES AND REFERENCE DATA, VOLUME I

IN.A 'ASEf I- 5TDV OF THE EFFECT OF A TACTICAL NUCLEAR -2.76 4

NUCLEAR DOCTRINE. ORGANIZATION END EQUIPMENT INUOGREI -2.2732 IREDEIREMENTS STUEVICOMMANS0 AND CONTROL STUDY

COMMUNICATIO NS AND TARGET ACOUISITIOW CONCEPTS IN -298 3TACTICAL NUCLEAR WARFAREI I 1

TACTICAL RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM CONCEPT STUDY 8-2.0 3 IREDEIREMENTSSTUOVII I I

AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES IIRSTUDY. VOLUME IX, COMMAND. 8-2.101 2 (ARFO IREMEN IS TUOYICONTROL ANDo COliACAiNSAlssION RfOUIEEMENTS

TACTICAL AWACS MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS N2..NS

TNEATER NUCLEAR C3. VOLUME 1. FINAL REPORT B-SIR?2 N 6

TREATER NUCLEAR C3. VOLUME 11. APPENDICES RI2.NI 0

FACTOR U8IVOLVEDE N ATTLEFIELD ELECTROMAGRETIC A.2,560 BCOVER. AND DECEPTION IBELCAD). VOLUMES I AND If

I1I 20A/"W

21



SPECIFIC ISSUES AV

k171

PROGRAM /DOCUMENT TITLE

TITLE AND ABSTRACTS OF TECHNICAL REPORTS. TECHNICAL B-.106 6 (BIBLIOGRAPHYIMEMORANDA. ASO PROFESSIONAL PAPERS PUBLISHED BY THESHAPE TECHNICAL CENTER

JRSC EXECUTING COMMANOERS TERMINAL SYSTEM/ B. (RE UiNEMEITS STUOYISUSYSTEM ANALYSIS

AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES IMls STUDY. VOLUME IX. 12.17 2 (REUIREMNTSSTUOYCOMMAND. CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS MISSIONREDUIREMENTS (ANNEXES)

REPORT TO ATI C3

INITIATIVES TASK FORCE ON C1

NUCLEAR B-.0 NSUJRVIVABILITY ISSUES0

PRELIMINARY THEATER C3

NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY B-LiA 4ASSESSMENT O

THEATER NUCLEAR PROGRAMS SYNTHESIS. VOLUME 1. Bl2SS 7 (REQUIREMENTS STUDY)SYTHESIS REPORT I

THEATER NUCLEAR PROGRAMSSYNTHESIS. VOLUME II. B2 F(REOUIREMENTSTUY)STUDY SUMMARIES

FII

OPERATIONAL CONCEPT FOR THE TOMAHAWK GROUND RE2.132 6 IREOUIREMENTS STUOY)LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE

ANALYSISOF THE SURVIVABILITY AND VULNERABILITY 32130OF E3-% IN CENTRAL EUROPE

22

2.3 DISTRIBUTION OF PREVIOUS EFFORT

Figure 2 depicts graphically the number of compendium entries

which contain information pertinent to each of the tentatively identified

TNF S2 C3 specific issues. A separate bar portraying the number of more

comprehensive assessments of the TNF S2 C3--those identified as Require-

ments Studies in the Compendium-is also shown for purposes of comparison.

This information indicates the relative weight of effort previously

allocated to the study and evaluation of questions which are directly

related to the specific C3 issues. Figure 2 also indicates which specific

issues are candidates for further work and which are less candidates for

further study and evaluation than for integration with other work done

previously. For example, only three programs/documents in the compendium

directly address the specific issue of Interoperable US-NATO Secure Voice.

On the other hand, 46 programs/documents deal with the specific issue of

Physical Survivability and Security. This suggests that specific Inter-

operability issues may be candidates for further assessment before recom-

mendations on possible new programs, if needed, can be formulated. By

comparison, all that may need to be done in the area of the Physical Sur-

vivability and Security issue is to evaluate and coordinate previous pro-

grams to ensure that they have been assigned proper priority and adequate

funding. While the potential utility to the TNF S2 C3 Program Manager of

such comparisons is obvious, he will have to examine each candidate for

further assessment carefully on its own merits since those assessments that

have been conducted in a relatively little studied issue area may well be

so recent, comprehensive in treatment, or of such excellence as to preclude

the need for additional work. It must also be remembered, as indicated

previously, that the amount of i.nformation contained in different com-

pendium entries which deal with a particular specific issue may vary

markedly.

23

C CL

2 (A

C L/)r-

'4-

4-0

Cc B

2-4

OI

DISTRIBUTiON LIST

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (Continued)

U.S. Documents Officer, AFSOUTH Defense Nuclear AgencyATTN: U.S. Documents Officer ATTN: STSP

ATTN: STSSArmed Fortes Staff College ATTN: STRA

ATTN: Reference & Technical Services Branch ATTN: VLISATTN: Dept. of Command Control & Communications ATTN: DDST

ATTN: OASOAssistant Secretary of Defense ATTN: STVLComm., Cmd., Cont. & Intell. ATTN: STNA

ATTN: Surveillance & Warning Systems 4 cy ATTN: TITLATTN: Assistant for NATO C3ATTN: Strat. & Theater C&C System Defense Technical Information Center

2 cy ATTN: DDAssistant Secretary of DefenseProgram Analysis & Evaluation Field Command

ATTN: General Purpose Programs Defense Nuclear AgencyATTN: FCPR

Assistant to the Secretary of Defense ATTN: FCP-FCPRKAtomic Energy

ATTN: Executive Assistant Field CommandATTN: B. Adams Defense Nuclear Agency

Livermore DivisionCommand & Control Technical Center Li Tmr D CPso

ATTN: C-610 ATTN: FCPRL

ATT(A. C-65 Interservice Nuclear Weapons SchoolATTN: C-300ATTN: C-330 ATTN: 1TV

Commander-in-Chief, U.S. European Command Joint Chiefs of StaffATTN: J-2-FTD ATTN: Is, Nuclear Divisiu,ATTN: J-2 ATTN: SAGAATTN: J-6 ATTN: J-3, WWMCCS Evaluation OfficeATTN: ECJ-6-OJ ATTN: J-3, Nuclear Contingency BranchATTN: J-5NPG ATTN: 3-3ATTN: J-3 ATTN: J-3, NMCCATTN: ECa6-OP ATTN: J-3, WWMCCS Council Support Office

Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Joint Strat. Tgt. Planning StaffATTN: J-54 ATTN: JLTW-2ATTN: 3-2 ATTN: JPSTATTN: 3-6 ATTN: NRI-STINFO, LibraryATTN: J-3 ATTN: JSAS

2 cy ATTN: JL

Defense Advanced Rsch. Proj. Agency Joint Tactical Communications Ofc.ATTN: TIO ATTN: TT-E-SS

Defense Communications Agency National Communications SystemATTN: Code 530 ATTN: NCS-TSATTN: Code 5OBATTN: Code 520 National Security AgencyATTN: Code 510 ATTN: R-52, 0. Van GuntenATTN: Code 410 ATTN: TDLATTN: Code 205

Defense Communications Engineer Center Net AssessmentATTN: Code R720 Office of the Secretary of DefenseATTN: Code R400 ATTN: Military Assistants

ATTN: Code R123 U.S. Forces Korea

Defense Intelligence Agency ATTN: CJ-P-G

ATTN: DT-4B ATTN: DJ-AM-SMATT4: RDS-3Acy ATTN: OT-IB U.S. National Military Representative, SHAPEATTN: U.S. Documents Officer

2

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (Continued)

Undersecretary of Defense for Rsch. & Engrg. U.S. Army Concepts Analysis AgencyATTN: Research & Adv. Tech. ATTN: Code 605/606ATTN: Strategic & Space Systems (OS)ATTN: Tactical Warfare Programs U.S. Army Electronics Rsch. & Dev. Command

ATTN: DRCPM-TDS-SDWWMCCS System Engineering Org. ATTN: DRCPM-ATC

ATTN: WWMCCS/SEECommander-in-Chief

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. Army Europe and Seventh ArmyATTN: DCSOPS-AEAGC-D

Asst. Chief of Staff for Intelligence ATTN: ODCSE-E-AEAGEDepartment of the Army ATTN: DCSOPS-AEAGB

ATTN: DAMI-FI ATTN: DCSOPS-AEAGC-DSWATTN: DCSOPS-AEAGD-MM

Atmospheric Sciences LaboratoryU.S. Army Electronics R&D Command U.S. Army Materiel Sys. Analysis Activity

ATTN: DELAS-AS ATTN: DRXSY-SATTN: DRXSY-DS

Deputy Chief of Staff for Ops. & PlansDepartment of the Army U.S. Army Missile R&D Command

ATTN: DAMO-PDW ATTN: DRSMI-YDRATTN: DAMO-ZDATTN: DAMO-RQC U.S. Army Nuclear & Chemical AgencyATTN: DAMO-SSP ATTN: Library for MONA-WED

ATTN: Library for MONA-SALDeputy Chief of Staff for Rsch. Dev. & Acq. ATTN: LibraryDepartment of the Army

ATTN: Advisor for RDA Analysis, M. Gale U.S. Army Satellite Comm. AgencyATTN: DAMA-CSS-N ATTN: TACSAT Office

ATTN: DRCPM-SC-11Harry Diamond LaboratoriesDepartment of the Army U.S. Army TRADOC Systems Analysis Activity

ATTN: DELHD-N-CO ATTN: ATAA-TACATTN: DELHD-N-RBHATTN: DELHD-N-RBA U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Comd.ATTN: DELHD-N-P ATTN: ATCD-ZATTN: DELHD-I-TL ATTN: Technical Library

2 cy ATTN: DELHD-N-EMU.S. Army War College

Multi Service Communications Systems ATTN: LibraryDepartment of the Army

ATTN: DRCPM-MSCS-APB, M. Francis V CorpsDepartment of the Army

U.S. Army Ballistic Research Labs. ATTN: AETVCEATTN: DRDAR-VL ATTN: AETVGBATTN: CAL ATTN: AETVGCATTN: TBL

VII CorpsU.S. Army Comb. Arms Combat Dev. Acty. Department of the Army

ATTN: ATCA-CFT ATTN: AETSCEATTN: ATCA-CO ATTN: AETSGB-OATTN: ATCA-CA ATTN: AETSGC

U.S. Army Comd. & General Staff College DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYATTN: ATSW-TA-D

Command & Control ProgramsU.S. Army Comm-Elec. Engrg. Instal. Agency Department of the Navy

ATTN: CCC-EMEO-PED ATTN: OP 941ATTN: CCC-SEOATTN: CCC-PRSO Naval Ocean Systems Center

Department of the NavyU.S. Army Communications Command ATTN: Research Library

ATTN: CC-OPS-WRATTN: CC-OPS-SM Naval Surface Weapons Center

ATTN: Code F31U.S. Army Communications Sys. Agency

ATTN: CCM-AD-LB

26

I14

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE (Continued)

Office of the Chief of Naval Operations Tactical Air CommandATTN: OP 96 Department of the Air ForceATTN: OP 94 ATTN: DRAATTN: OP 604 E/F

Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Air Forces in EuropeCommander-in-Chief, i.S. Atlantic Fleet ATTN: DOC

ATTN: Code J54 ATTN: XPXXATTN: Code J-611A

Ballistic Missile OfficeCommander-in-Chief, U.S. Naval Forces, Europe Air Force Systems Command

ATTN: N3262, Nuclear Surety Officer ATTN: MRBM

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY

Air Force Geophysics Laboratory Central Intelligence AgencyATTN: SULL ATTN: OSR/SF, R. Virgo

ATTN: OSR/SECAir Force Weapons Laboratory ATTN: DS]/LSD, R. HartAir Force Systems Comand

ATTN: OYC DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTORS

ATTN: SULBDM Corp.

Assistant Chief of Staff ATTN: W. SweeneyIntelligence ATTN: Corporate LibraryDepartment of the Air Force ATTN: D. Poe

ATTN4: INAK ATTN: R. CarlinATTN: R. MacOnie

Assistant Chief of Staff ATTN: J. WilsonStudies & Analyses ATTN: W. WhangDepartment of the Air Force ATTN: C. Campbell

ATTN: AF/SASC ATTN: A. ReeseATTN: AF/SAGF ATTN: T. Julian

ATTN: P. DittmerDeputy Chief of StaffOperationi Plans and Readiness Boeing Co.Department of the Air Force ATTN: R. Scheppe

ATTN: AFXOXFMATTN: AFXOK 66th MI Group

ATTN: RDA/MunichDeputy Chief of StaffResearch, Development, & Acq. Computer Sciences Corp.Department of the Air Force ATTN: Security Officer for H. Blank

ATTN: AFRDQSM ATTN: Library

Electronic Systems Division ESL, Inc.Department of the Air Force ATTN: J. Marshall

ATTN: XRC ATTN: Library

Foreign Technology Division General Electric Co.-TEMPOAir Force Systems Coemand ATTN- DASIAC

ATTN: NIIS, Library

General Electric Co. -TEMPOHeadquarters Space Division ATTN: DASIACAir Force Systems Command

ATTN: SKA Institute for Defense AnalysesATTN: D. Signori

Headquarters Space Division ATTN: Classified LibraryAir Force Systems Command

ATTN: YCPC Kaman Sciences Corp.ATTN: D. Choate

Strategic Air CommandDepartment of the Air Force RCA Corp.

ATTN: XPFS ATTN: E. Van KeurenATTN: NRTATTN: DCXT

27

i

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTORS (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTORS (Continued)

R & 0 Associates SRI internationalATTN: R. Poll ATTN: W. JayeATTN: R. Schaefer ATTNz C. ShoensATTN: Technical tnl'ornwation CenterATTN: R. Latter TRW~. Defense & Space Sys. GroupATTN: C. MacDonald ATTN: W. Rowan

R & 0AssocatesTRW Defense & Space Sys. GroupATTN: L. Delaney AT:~ yhATTN: A. Cicolani

mm"8