Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A-AOU US8 -~ COW MCLEAN VA PS ISPIgig TmgATK NOLE FORM8 SluWVABILfY AM6 UgTN 56I) -4TC ulOCC 79 a j CARLIN# J 0 WILSON. T A JULIAN PUSU.?I-79-SS
UWLASIPI on ussuAe8.?-ThUV-OL- Ns-SOmmii IIIII7
IIII III1 IIII1 B2ISO
11L U1.25 OF S A ]6
MCOOYRESOLUTION TEST CHARTNATIONAL BUREAU Of STANDARDS-1 963-A
ZLEVEL DNA 5040T-1DOD THEATER NUCLEAR FORCES
SSURVIVABILITY AND SECURITY (TNFS2 )•
COMPENDIUM OF ASSESSMENTS RELATEDoo TO TNFS 2C3 PROGRAM
SVolume I
SThe BDM Corporation
7915 Jones Branch Drive
McLean, Virginia 22102
31 December 1979
Topical Report for Period 27 November 1978-31 December 1979
CONTRACT No. DNA 001-79-C-0090
DTICAPPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; ELECTE.
DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. S APR 2 3 1980
B
THIS WORK SPONSORED BY THE DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCYUNDER RDT&E RMSS CODE B390079465 A99QAXFA10602 H2590D.
Prepared for
Director
C) DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY
* L t,- Washington, D. C. 20305
80 3 14 132
Destroy this report when it is no longerneeded. Do not return to sender.
PLEASE NOTIFY THE DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY,ATTN: STTI, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20305, IFYOUR ADDRESS IS INCORRECT, IF YOU WISH TOBE DELETED FROM THE DISTRIBUTION LIST, ORIF THE ADDRESSEE IS NO LONGER EMPLOYED BYYOUR ORGANIZATION.
ON
'~. .-
UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered)
REPOT DCU INTAION AGEREAD INSTRUCTIONSREPORT DOCU#ENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM
1. REPORT NUMBER l 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER
DNA 5040T-1 itD,,e 34. TITLE (and Subtitle) S. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED
DOD THEATER NUCLEAR FORCES SURVIVABILITY AND Topical Report for Period(TF2 27 Nov 78--31 Dec 79________
SECURITY (TNFS ): COMPENDIUM OF ASSESSMENTS . PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER
RELATED TO TNFS2C3 PROGRAM, Volume I BDM/W-205-79-TR.(Rev)7. AUTHOR(s) C.E. Campbell I- CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERs)R.J. Carlin D.T. Poe R.T. MacOnieJ.G. Wilson W.G. Hwang W.E. Sweeney DNA 001-79-C-0090T.A. Julian A.L. Reese P.H. Dittmer
9, PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT. TASK
The BDM Corporation AREA WORK UNIT NUMBERS7915 Jones Branch Drive Subtask A99QAXFA106-02McLean, Virginia 22102
II. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS Q2. REPORT DATE
Director 31 December 1979Defense Nuclear Agency 13. NUMBER OF PAGESWashington, D.C. 20305 30
14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME 6 ADDRESS(if different from Controlling Office) IS. SECI RITY CLASS (ol this report)
UNCLASSIFIED- 1'Sa. DECL ASSI FICATON/DOWNGRADING
"- SCHEDULE
16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of this Report)
Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abstract entered in Block 20, if different from Report)
IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
This work sponsored by the Defense Nuclear Agency under RDT&E RMSS CodeB390079465 A99QAXFAI0602 H2590D.
19. KEY WORDS (Continue on revere, aide if neceeeary and identify by block number)
Communications and Radio Systems Survival GeneralCommand and Control Systems Nuclear ForcesTactical Communications SecurityNuclear Weapons Theater Nuclear Forces
20. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse aide if necessary and Identify by block number)
This volume describes the TNFS2C3 Compendium and indices and indicates how
individual documents in the Compendium relate to specific TNFS2C3 issues..4
DD 1°N73 1473 EDITO.OF1NOVSSOUSOLETE UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Date Entered)
______ 4 / 2k
PREFACE
This compendium of related command, control and communications
(C 3) assessments has been developed to assist the DNA TNF S2 C3 Program
- Manager in the formulation of policy choices for higher level decision.
Each program, assessment and related document identified in the compendium
has been analyzed and correlated with the tentatively identified specific
C3 issues wherever possible. The results of the analysis and correlation
effort have been structured in a format designed to optimize the utility of
the data.
Three attributes of each assessment/document have been high-
lighted:
(1) Date of publication of effort (where appropriate). This provides
a sense of the technological framework within which each assess-
ment/document was completed.
(2) Numerical indication of impact. This empirically-derived judge-
ment provides a measure of the significance of each assessment/
document to the TNF S2 C3 Program. The judgement has been based
on extensive work in the TNF C3 area and comparisons of the
compendium programs/assessments/documents with each other and
with the objectives of the TNF S2 C3 Program.
(3) Applicability to the seven tentatively identified specitic TNF C3
issues. These issues include: U.S. Custodial Commuofications,
Interoperable US/NATO Secure Voice, Jam Resistant Communica-
tions, OPSEC, Physical Survivability and Security, Satellite
Communications, and Restoral/Reconstitution.
Certain assessments or eelated documents because of their scope
and/or objectives have been listed as "Requirements Studies" or "Biblio-
graphies".
The information on each compendium entry will provide the Program
Manager with the means to consider both whether and how best to consider
the results of a particular assessment or related document in formulating
the desired policy choices. The envisioned structure for such formulation
deliberately focuses upon the Program Manager as the key agent in the
process because of the perceived need for a single authority having a
comprehensive knowledge of C3 requirements and the issues arising from
them.
There are a significant number of currently on-going or projected
study efforts or programs the results of which may impact on the objectives
and direction of the TNF S2 C3 Program. These efforts include some of the
more comprehensive approaches such as the ACE Requirements Study, the NICS
II Architecture work, and the activities of the USEUCOM Nuclear Communi-
cations Task Force. In addition, a number of potentially relevant more
specific tactical C3 improvement/upgrade programs are in various stages of
development or implementation. These include:
(1) Joint Tactical Communications Program (TRI-TAC)
(2) Joint Multichannel Trunking and Switching System (JMTSS)
(3) Jam Resistant Secure Communications (JRSC)
(4) Position Location Reporting System (PLRS)
(5) U.S. Army Theater Nuclear Force Survivability (TNF S)
(6) Integrated Tactical Communications System (INTACS)
(7) Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS)
(8) SELREL Improvement Program (SELRIP)
(9) Deployable WWMCCS C3 Capability (DWC )
(10) U.S. Army Theater Communications System (TCS)
(11) Communications Support Requirements - Echelons Above Corps
(COMSREAC-85)
In most cases, it is too early to positively identify or predict
the impact of the various on-going programs on the TNF S2 C3 Program. How-
ever, all of the above programs merit continuing close monitoring by the
TNF S2 C3 Program Manager to identify possible correlation of their efforts
and results with the TNF S2 C3 Program. In those cases where a direct
applicability to TNF S2 C3 Program objectives has been identified, infor-
mation on the relevant program has been included in the compendium. Simi-
larly, where reports or other documents have been produced under such
programs (and it has been determined that these reports/documents have
2
EL _7
potential applicability to the TNF S 2 C 3 Program) the specific reports/documents have been included in the TNF S2 C3 compendium.
As additional program results become available and applicabilityto the TNF S2 C0 Program becomes better defined, each of the on-goingprograms should be reexamined to determine:
(1) How their results can be most effectively integrated into the TNF
S 2 C3Program effort; and
(2) What, if any, steps might be taken to avoid duplication of effort
and better integrate the separate program activities with the TNF
S2 03 Program.
ACESSION for
NTIS w'i e section
tOC Butt section 0
UANN' 'IWM 0JiUs'l i-K" C -- -
...................................
Dist. AVAIL and/or SP'ECIAL
311
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
PREFACE- -l------- --- ---- ---- -- 1
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS--------- --- -- - 5
1 INTRODUCTION AND ORGANIZATION------------ 7
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE--------- --- 71.2 ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPENDIUM----- 81.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE INDEX -------- 12
2 THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE COMPENDIUM TO THE TNFS2C3 PROGRAM ---- ------- ---- --- 13
2.1 INDIVIDUAL PROGRAM/DOCUMENTRELATIONSHIPS --------- -- ---- 13
2.2 GENERAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PROGRAMS/DOCUMENTS --------- --- --- 13
2.3 DISTRIBUTION OF PREVIOUS EFFORT- ---- 23
Appendix (Published separately as Volume II)
A ALPHABETICAL INDEX TO COMPENDIUM
B CHRONOLOrJCAL INDEX TO COMPENDIUM, COMPENDIUM
OF TNF S2C3 ASSESSIENTS
4
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Page
1 TNF S2 related compendium format- -- ---- ----- 9
2 Number of assessments addressing- each specific
TNFS 2 C3 issue- -- ---- -------- ----- 24
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
I Relationship of individual programs/documients
of TNF S2C3 assessments--- ----- -------- 14
5
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION AND ORGANIZATION
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The DOD TNF S2 Program has been undertaken by the Defense Nuclear
Agency to enhance theater nuclear force effectiveness through improved
survivability and security. The command, control and communications (C3)
issues of TNF S2 focus on a variety of operational entities, command and
support functions, political and military requirements, and supporting
communications systems. The specific supporting roles and the communi-
cations requirements vary with the operational circumstances and the
perceived threat.
The objective of the TNF S2 C3 Program is to enhance TNF
effectiveness through near term and long term improvements in the surviv-
ability and security of those US national, non-US national, and NATO
command, control and communications systems and procedures which support
the theater nuclear force. Specifically, the program provides for an
in-depth examination of the survivability and security aspects of those C3
systems and procedures associated with the deployment, maintenance and
employment of theater nuclear forces. The basic concept and overall
approach of the TNF S2 C3 Program provides for early identification of
issues and the testing of potential technological and procedural
improvements.
This particular report has as its purpose the identification and
analysis of relevant C3 programs and assessments conducted outside the TNF
S2 C3 Program in order to determine their applicability to TNF S2 C3 Program
objectives. The study is comprised of two parts:
(1) Identification of TNF C3 programs and assessments, and
(2) Analysis and correlation of the identified assessments to the TNF
S C Program.
Each report or document which has been identified has been evaluated in
terms of:
(1) How it may impact on the TNF S2 C3 Program;
(2) The significance of its contents with respect to TNF S2 C3 Program
objectives and issues; and
RAM
I
(3) How relevant results of past, ongoing, or future assessments may
be integrated into the TNF S2 C3 Program.
This volume contains the results of the evaluation process described above.
The compendium listing the relevant C3 program/assessments and related
documents is published separately as an Appendix to this report to facili-
tate its intergration with the existing TNF S2 Compendium.
1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPENDIUM
Each assessment and document which has been identified and
included in this compendium has been described in terms of: its bibliogra-
phical information, a TNF S2 Related Compendium code letter and C3 code
number, and an abstract of the document.
1.2.1 Bibliographical Information
Each entry in this compendium should contain the following
bibliographical information:
(1) Title of Document,
(2) Contractor/Agency Author and Location,
(3) Technical Report Number (or Access/Log Number),
(4) Contracting Agency and Location,
(5) ContracL Number,
(6) Date of Document,
(7) Classification of Document
(8) AD Number (if DDC document) and
(9) Distribution (Limited, etc.)
In some cases an entry may not contain all of the aforementioned bibliogra-
phical data because complete information was not available or because the
project is ongoing. These entries were retained in the survey to keep the
compendium as comprehensive as possible. The missing data will be compiled
as it becomes available and will be included in future revisions of this
document. Figure 1 depicts a sample worksheet format that can be repro-
duced for the purpose of submitting additions to the TNF S2 Related Com-
pendium.
8**
Title of Document:
Contractor/Agency Author and Location:
Technical Report No. (or Access/Log No.):
Contracting Agency and Location:
Contract No.:
Date of Document:
Classification of Document:
AD No. (If DDC Document):
Distribution:
CODE:
1 SUMMARY:
Figure 1. TNF S2 related compendium format.
9
1.2.2 TNF 52 Related Compendium Code Letter
The TNF S2 Related Compendium Code Letter indicates the various
TNF S2 C3 Program areas a particular source addresses. The TNF S2 Related
Compendium categorizes data sources according to their relationship(s) to
the following areas of overall program concern:
(1) Threat, CODE LETTER: A
(2) C3, B
(3) Security, C
(4) Survivability, D
(5) Theater Nuclear Force, E
(6) Simulations and Models, F
(7) Testing, and G
(8) Miscellaneous. H
1.2.3 TNF S2 C3 Code Number
All of the programs and documents included in the TNF S2 C3 Pro-
gram compendium (Appendix B) have been identified with a TNF S2 Related
Compendium Code Letter "B" indicating a relationship to the general C3
area. Where appropriate, additional general INF S2 areas have also been
identified.
To further assist the reviewer in identifying the information
available in a particular report or document source, each entry in Appendix
B has been assigned a C3 code number in addition to the code letter "B".
The C3 code number indicates a relationship within the general C3 area to
one or more of the following more specific areas of TNF S2 C3 Program
concern:
(1) Threat to C3 CODE NUMBER: 1
(2) Security of C3 facilities* 2
(3) Survivability of C3 facilities 3
(4) C3 Requirements 4
(5) C3 Modeling and Simulation 5
(6) C3 Testing 6
Therefore, a B.5 code entry in Appendix B, for example, would
indicate that the entry relates to the general C3 area and in particular to
10
I
the modeling and simulation of C3 systems or networks. Similarly, a B.3.4
entry would indicate a particular relationship to survivability issues for
C3 facilities as well as C3 requirements.
The scope of the related area indicated by each of the TNF S2 C3
code numbers is as follows:
(1) Threat to C 3. (Code number 1) This area encompasses considera-
tion of the complete spectrum of threats to C3 systems and pro-
cedures including sabotage, terrorist actions, electronic warfare
(including direction finding and jamming), COMSEC and OPSEC
procedures, conventional attack and nuclear weapons effects.
(2) Security of C3 facilities. (Code number 2) This area includes
consideration of vulnerabilities and corrective actions which
would impact on the security of C3 facilities and which could
have an impact on the overall effectiveness of the theater
nuclear force. It includes considerations of protective measures
to enhance security (such as provision of improved alarm systems
or reinforced guard forces).
(3) Survivability of C3 facilities. (Code number 3) This area
includes consideration of vulnerabilities and corrective actions
which would impact on the survivability of C3 facilities and
which could have an impact on the overall effectiveness of the
theater nuclear force. It includes consideration of such mea-
sures as increased hardening and the use of multiple paths and
interlocking networks.
(4) C3 Requirements. (Code number 4) This area includes considera-
tion of C3 facilities, systems and procedures required to support
the four primary functions of the TNF: Deployment; Employment;
Storage, Maintenance and Security; and Readiness and Reliability.
It includes establishment and analysis of information need lines
and communications connectivity requirements.
(5) C3 Modeling and Simulation. (Code number 5) This area includes
consideration of modeling and simulation activities conducted to
assess the capabilities and limitations of the C systems, net-
works, and procedures which support the TNF. It includes digital
E11
and hybrid simulations designed to represent C3 equipment or
systems under realistic conditions.
(6) C3 Testing. (Code number 6) This area includes consideration of
the results of C3 test programs which could have an impact on the
objectives of the TNF S2 C3 Program. It includes both direct and
indirect test results.
1.2.4 Document Abstract
The third part of each entry consists of an abstract of the
document which indicates the scope and type of information contained within
the data source and, where appropriate, a summary of key results.
1.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE INDEX
Two indices are provided for the user's convenience. The first
index is an alphabetical arrangement of the program/document titles with
appropridte code entries and page numbers. The second index is a chrono-
logical arrangement of the program/document titles with the most recent (or
on-going or projected) program/documents being listed first. Again, the
appropriate code entries and page numbers are provided. These indices are
located in Appendix A and B, respectively, in Volume II.
12
S
I*
SECTION 2
THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE COMPENDIUM TO THE
TNF S2 C3 PROGRAM
2.1 INDIVIDUAL PROGRAM/DOCUMENT RELATIONSHIPS
Table I depicts graphically the relationship and relevance of
each document included in the compendium to the TNFS 2 C3 Program. The
potential impact and significance of the results of a specific assessment
or related document are represented by a numerical value on a scale of 1 to
10 in the "Impact/Significance" column. The larger the number, the greater
the relevance to the TNFS2 C3 Program. The impact/significance number also
reflects the age of the information. For example, a designation of five
indicates an assessment or related document containing old but still useful
data. Numbers above this level reflect increasing utility both in terms of
how recently the assessment was completed (if not currently on-going or
planned) and in the degree of detail and scope of the pertinent infor-
mation. Numbers between I and 4 generally indicate older assessments which
contain data which may be useful primarily in the development of a current
oaseline including capabilities and deficiences.
2.2 GENERAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PROGRAMS/DOCUMENTS
The entries in the "Specific Issues" columns in the table are
related to the previous technical report in this series. The "Specific
Issues" entry indicates relevance to the specific C3 issues which have been
tentatively identified. The "Index" column refers the reader to the appro-
priate page of the compendium. The indication that a particular document
addresses one or more specific TNF S2 C3 issues does not indicate that
either the scope or detail of the relevant discussion in that document
meets some predetermined standard. Consequently, there may be marked
differences among a group of documents in the amount of information each
contains on a given issue which the table indicates each document addresses
in common with several others in that group.
13
W Pi
Table 1. Relationship of individual programs/documents to
TNF S2C3 issues.
PROGRAM /DOCUMENT TITLE
MINUTES DNA PROGRAM.ZNDINCA COORINATION MEETING 8.2.8 2 **INTEGRATED TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM, TASK IV, 8-211 2
REFIEBES ALTERNIATIVE MAYF COMMUNEICATIONS CONCEPTS
AN OVERIVIEW Of HF COMUINICATIONS IN A NUCLEAR 112114ENVIRONMENT
NUCLEAR VULNKAILITY ASSESSMENT OF TACTICAL SHIP- 9-2.1 SBOARD ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS
ANALYSIS OF THE 1R45 TACTICAL NUCLEAR LAND SATTLE 8-2.48 4 IREOUIREMENTS STEOYI
U.SS. BLUE RIDGE (LCCII COMMUNICATIONS EFFECTIVENESS B2.52 3EVALUATION
INTRODUCTION 10 NUCLEAR WREAPONS EFFECTS ON NAVAL 1121 RIHit" FREOIIENCY COMMUJNICATIONS SYSTEMS 0
TACTICAL SATELLITE COMMUINICATIONS COST EFFECTIVE 8-2.24 5NESS ANALYSIS STUDY ITACIIATCOMI,VOLOIEE it. APPENDIXU. THR EAT TO U 1. ARMY COMMUNICATIONS
* UINICATIOUS ELECTRONICS-7SICE-75). FHASE I, FIELD 8.2.22 4ARMY. VOLUME 4. ARNEX f COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMSCONCEPTS
INTEGBATED NUCLEAR COMbUNICATIONS ASSESSMENT. 5.2.31 5PHASE I REPORT
NAVAL TEEIECONMNICATIOIS SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE. 8.2.50 5 (REOOIBEMENTS TUOYI
ANALYSIS Of TYYFICAL THEATEB ARMY CDMMUNICATION 1.2.46 5LINKS U AONLIA11 ENVIRONMENT
Sw 8NM VULNEBFA8EITY AND SUBVIVASILITY STUDY, 6-0.82 4
MINUTES. DNA INCA PROGRAM. IR" COOROIRlATION ot, 11TRK 2112 4
E UROPE AN TEEATENA NUCLEAR FORCESEC3ESYTEMSSTUDY. 8.2.48 6 (BEOUIB EME11TDETUOYI
FINAL REPORT
MIUE. BINA INICAMPOSRAM. 1111 COORINATION MUETUB 5-2.8 A
SAV TACTICALNBDCLBANAMAPONOSTUOY, VOLUME1 52.04
MINUTES DNA INCA PRORAM, 411N COORDINATION MEETING 1251 3
MINUTES 0NA INCA PROGRAM, 300 COORDSINATION MEETING 82889 2
PROTECTION ofE~ RICS"owNUSEICLEAR tPLDOn 1-2.12 1
EFFECTS0
1 2OA/I79W
14
Table 1. Relationship of individual programs/documents to
TNF S2C3 issues. (Continued)
PROGRAM / DOCUMENT TITLE S U
f
MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK 5219 6SYSTEM ENGINEER
JOURNAL OF DEFENSE RESEARCH. VOLUME S. N0 4 9218 3
IMPROVING THE EFFELTIVENESS OF NATO'S THEATER NUCLEAR 9239FORCE
ANALYSIS OF TWO-WAY AND REPORT BACK THEATER 5.51 4COMMUNICATIONS
COMPARISON OF SOVIET ARE US. GROUND FORCE CAPABILITIES 1.228 AIN ELECTRONIC WARFARE. VOLUMES I AND R AND EXECUTIVEaRIEFING
MINUTES. DNA INCA PROGRAM. BTH COORDINATION MEETING 1.2.33 4
EUROPEAN COMMAND. CONTROL, AND COMMUNICATIONS STUDY A217 5GROUP. FINAL REPORT
NAV C3
STUDY -243
INCA PROPAGATION PATH EFFECTS ASSESSMENT FOR SATELLITE 52.79 4AN TROPOSCATTER COMMUNICATIONS IN THE TACTICALTHEATER
COLLECTION AND PROCESSING OF INFORMATION PERTINENT TO B221THE TACTICAL NUCLEAR BATTLEFIELD
IMPACT OF SABOTAGE ON OCS FACILITIES. PHASE I S..1 N
IMPACT OF SABOTAGE OR MANNED UCS FACILITIES, TASK I, 213
SURVEY AN ANALYSIS
IMPACT OF SABOTAGE IN MANNED DCS FACILITIES, TASK 2. R2COST BENEFITS ANALYSIS
MULTIPLE SYSTEMS EVALUATION PROGRAM, FINAL REPORT ON US R IREOUIREMENTS STUDY)CRITICAL COMMUNICATIONS FOR TACTICAL NUCLEAR DELIVERYSYSTEMS
ASSESSMENT OF RCA.TOTHSATER C3
SYSTEMS 524 1
SHAPE C2 SUOVIVABILITY SUPPORT PROGRAM 2 7
BLAST EFFECTS ON USWEAPOS SYSTEMS. VEHICLE SYSTEMS. 52E0AND CS EOUIPMERTNUCLEAR WEF APONS EFFECTS VULRERABILITY TESTS 21 8
DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC VULNERAILITY INFORMATION N.. 1SURCES
, 15
Table 1. Relationship of individual programs/documents toTNF S2C3 issues. (Continued)
PROGRAM /DOCUMENiT TITLEA- 2
IIIVESTIGATION OF THE VUL1NGRAITY/SURVVAIIT OFI21SYTEMS SUPPORTINEG THE INCA DECISION ROCESS
NET TECHNICAL ASSMIUENT: IPAVT OF SW ON TARGEYKILL 652ROLES AT U.S. BRIGADEISOVIET REGIMENTAL LEVEL o
MINUTES, SEA NCA PROGRAM. 10TH COORDINATION MEETING 6216 4
INTEGRATED TACTICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN STUDY ES RU0 S REaUIAGMENTS STUDY)
ELECTRONIC WARFARE VULNERABILITY OF U.S. ARMY N-ZAM ISELECTED OVERSEAS TACTICAL UNITS * 0
MINUTES, DNA 1INCA PROGRAM. ITH COORDINATION MEETING U 2.94 4
EMP ASSESSMENT FOR ARMY TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS 62.1 4SYSTEMS. TRANSMISSIONI SYSTEMS SERIES 110.1I- RADIOTERMINAL SET AN1TBC 146
EST-VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS OF RAIO SETS A1iPRC-I7. E..3AN, VECR., ANE AR(GRC-16H
ARCHITECT UP[ FOR TACTICAL SWITCHED COMMUNICATIONS 12.75 1 IREOUIRiEMERTS STUDY)SYSTEMS
EVALUATION OF SURVIVANILITY/RECOVERAIILITY NSPECTS 62.65 ?0 THE OCS SYSTEM CONSUBIL
IPACT OF 90 WITEOAGMBCE US 911101S LOVE I COMBAT 5B2.E 5
U.S. FORWARSI AIR DEFENSE EWN'&RAAEILITY 6.2.31 0 *PROCEEDINESF THE TW6ftV.UCOND ANNEAL JOINT 6-24N 4ELECTRONIC WARFARE WPERElNCU. VOLUME1 I 0
EUBOPSAB Des UBRV9NA6LITY !ENHANCEMENTS STUDY 11-2.114 1 (REOUIINTS STUDY)
EPPRETIVENESS OF HABOUBIROSHIPSVELUMI.EXECUTIVE 65204101. Y
EFFECTIVESS OF MARUGINN SNIPS. VOLUME 2 -2.61 1
US. NAVY SATELLITE COMUNICATIONS VULNERILITY: Ea 2.0INITIAL ASINT OF THEVULONASILITY OP SATELLITE!COUPINICATIONS TO INCEPT. seEOPOSIIONIB. ANgEXPLOETATION THERIUGH lIBE
JOINT BATTLEFIELD NUCLEAR OPTION PROCEOURESBTUOV BORN8 1
1 120A/79W
II 16
-71
Table 1. Relationship of individual programs/documents to
TNF S2C3 issues. (Continued)
SPECIFIC ISSUES
PRIOGRAMI DOCUMENTT?IE
THEME~~~C R U L ARW'ANE
REOUIIEEM 'ITS AlSO SOLUTIONS FOR DACO LLCTIO N A ELE 1.11 1 fRERStIEEfiffS STUDY)TREAEERESSCLLAARWAR.AARM11)(11
SVE T OttC THREAT TO Tiff.VOLUME 11 INAL REPORT .2614 0 @ 0 40AfTACC& -'RFORIWASCE ili AS EIN E NVIOIIIAit, fKAM 1, 2,.11 7FIRAI. REPORT @
AFCEATEUFOSIIM "INTERNATIONAL INTEROPERASIITY. 11,122 6
CommRilATIOms, COMANG AND CONTROL"
JOURNAL OF DEFENE REROANCIC TACTICAL C) 3.2.44 5
IMPACT Of SELECTED COUNITER Cl OPERATION$SON SOVIIET 3.2,19 5ITACTICAL MIRSIoll EFFECTIV/FEESS
ANNUAL DEFENSE REPORT FOR FY$9?9 I21
INEITIAL VUL*ERAIILIE' ASEEU!tl Of EXISTING AD lilts 114'" ASTAGE I COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
COMIMAND. COINTROL, ANDC OMMUNICAT1IN FOR US. 82.122 4THEATER NUICLEAR FORCER IN PACOM
INFORMATION REQIREMENTS FOR TOE CONVINTIONALI S21* IREOUIAEMERS STUDY)NUCLEAR IATTLEFIELD I
OtFER$SENCE 1110EAR AS *Ot Ott THEATER NUCLEAR 114,124 # IF41OOiJREMENTS STODY)FORCES RESEARCH ARC, REVELOPWRT REQUIIREMENTS
EUROPEAN THEATER ANALYINS. APPENIX A. 111111 CENARIO, 12 120f INATO FORCES0
1 1OPERATIONAL. CONCEPTS FOR THE RNUCLEAR TOMAHAWK 911% 1S FRIRI EMEIi~ TRSTSOFiGR)1UAR LAUN CHED COIE m4sRLE I I
FIR10 ARTILLERY ORGAIZATION AND SYSTEM REROURIARERTS. 11Z21 4 (REQEIARIMETSTEOyiw 414m3 VOLUMNE InISK 54lIME FRAME
JOINT TEST Of VIILRERASUiTfY Of IE. TACTICAL DATA LIANS. 64212812
04:1441 oEffIRITEGR HRASE 4
I 120A/7gIW
17
Table 1. Relationship of individual programs/documents to
T!IF S2C3 issues. (Continued)
PROGRAM) I OCUMAEAT TITLE *
WWMCCS ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVES FOR THEATER NUCLEAR 1-2.117 7 IREOVIREMENTS STUDY)
WAR. SIXTH REPORT. VOL UME [, EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW ANDARCHITECTURAL SUNIMARY
WWMCCS ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVES FOS THEATER NUCLEAR R2118 7 (HEDUIREMNT STUDv).WAR, VOLUME 2. ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVESI I I
CANDIDATE @ROAD ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVES AND 1-2.119 7 (REQUIREMENTS STUDY1
DECISION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE WwMCtS. SOUTH REPORT.
IMPLICATIONS(OS TACTICAL SATTLE1.0L SITUVATONS AND SO2. 2 7 REOUIRIET STUDY)
SYSTEMS DR THE REQUIREMENTS FOP THE MWRCCS
ARCHITECTURE I I I"'I. CU ARCHITECT)'RAL ALTERNATIVES AND DECISION 1-2.121 7 IREQUIRDH......SISSY)
CONSIOIRATIOS FOR CRISIS SITUATIONS. EIGHTH REPORT I I IIDENTIFICATION SF SOME TOPICS FORAFPROPOSED PAPA 82.23 2 IRDOUIREMENTS STUDY)
TACTICAL WARFARE STUDIES PROGRAM
SOVIET CAPAEILITY TO CONDUCT ELECTRONIC WARFARE ES2.121 HAT AINST -3S SPACE SYSTEMS0 0
ECCM FOR DEFENSE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (OCS) 1-2.141 7
WARSAW PACT SIGNAL IN:T!LLIG ENCE AND ELECTRONIC 1.2130 VWARFARE THREAT TO SOUROUNE FORCES
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE EtCH LAUNCHI CONTROL 1.2.137 UCENTER
ANTI JAMPOLICY STUDY. FINAL REPORT, VOLUEME11. ANTO-JAM 12.148 RREQUIREMERTS
ECCMIFOREOCO EZ2.1R 7
TASE TR'I R1 CDMMA)NICATIONS. COMAND ANE CONTROL. R.D14 0I NiRtouloltmifTS37uovlFINAL REPORT I I I
RATS INTEGRATED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM STASH 11 111461 I)EGUIKEVENTS STUDY)ARCHITUNE. VOLUME II (PLUS ANNESESI
RATIONALIZATIO /STANOAROIZATIRR WITHOIN NATO. FIFTH ES~t tRECOEP RE1PORT"TO THU CONGRESS
MALLARD I VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS N.-SI4S 1
I IA SI.D.JITMLIHNE TRUNING AND 812A.8 7 (REQUIREMENTS STUDY)
SITCHING SYSTEM IUMAALYSS IRPLAN 41421- - -I I11l2OA/711101
18
- .. 0.6
Table 1. Relationship of individual programs/documents to
TNF S203 issues. (Continued)
PRiOGRAM/ DOCUMENT TITLE
JMTSS MARAGEMENTIEMKEMENTF.TIGN PLAN. SECOND DRAFT *.2JS a (REQUJIREMENTS STUDY)
GROUND MOILI FORCESSATELLITE COIMM016ICAliONS. VOLUME 1.2.148 7 IREOUIREMERTE STUDY)
I. OPERATIONAL CONCEPTSI I
GROUND MOOILE FORCE SATELLITE COMMIUNICATIONS. VOLUME El 141 7 (NEOUIREMEEITS STUDY)HI. CONTROL CONCEPTSI
I
I)I0CLEARI CDIJNICATIOI1MBI FORCE 1NCTAF) REPORT 1-2.143 I REQUIREMENTS STUDY)
OPERAIONAL CONCEPT FOR THE NCTAP PROPOSED COMMIII 062.14 9
CATIONS ENHANCEMENTS 0 0 g
ALLIED COMAND EUROPE (ACE)INUCLEAR COMMAND 1-2.51 I REGDIREMENTS jTIJIS CONTROL IMPDOVEMNT~ PROGRAMj
ED EUCOM COMMARD AND CONTROL SOLUTIONS 0.2.10 a (REQUIREMENTS STUDY)I IDEVELOPMENT OF SCOPE FOR IMPROVING THE DURVIVABILITY1 8-2.11 1 IREOUIRDERERTS STUDY)
SECURITY OF THE THEATER NUCLEAR FORCE I IMMMCCS ARCHITECTURAL PLAN. ELEVERTH REPORT 6.2.12 F RES EREUETS STUDY)
TACTICAL COMMAND ARE CONTROL SYSTEM INTERCEPT 6-2.133 3VULIERABILITY ANALYSIS, VOLUME 1. INTRODUCTION ARESUMMARY
AR ASSESSMENT OP TRE TECHROLOGY P0R CONTROL OF FORCES ES .114 3AND WEAPONS OR TRE IIATTLEPIELD. IRTE RIM RE PORT
IMPROVING TACTICAL COMMAND AID CONROL 1R CERTRAL 3.2.13O 4 IREDUIREENTS STUDY)EUROPE
TO&O OF TAC CONSEC SYSTEM. RED FLAG Ti7 B-h 012I
LAUNCHI CONTROL CENTER COMEICAYIONS STDYO 8-.61 7 REIIEET STUDY)
CENTRALIZED C IN NIATO. FORCE MULTIPLIER DR SHORT7 1.1101 ICIRCUIT?
11 20A/79W
19
Table 1. Relationship of individual programs/documents to
TNF S2C3 issues. (Continued)
PROGRAM]I DOCUMENT7 TI7E
ANALYSIS OF BASELINE TACTICAL C3
VULNEIIAIII ITY IN A 112.113 aNtUtitEAR ANVI"OIIME7
SURVIVABILITY AND EM-LOYMENT OF TAZICAL NUCLEAR AND 9 ZA2CONVENTIONAL AIRPOWENA IN CENTRAL NATO. PHIASE I
NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY AND VUILNERAII.7Y OF NAVAL CS BN.45 RISYSTEMS IN EUROPEAN TIIEATE R OPERATIONS
PACIFIC SATELLITE COMMUINICATIONS EMP SURVIVABILITY B-2461 5
TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNTIER.CDUNTER MEASURES PON 8-2.67TACI(CAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS0
NTA TACTICAL AIR SUPPORT OF U.S. FORWARD AREA GROUND 8.2.4 5COMMANDERS IN AN EW ENVIRONMENT7
EMF ASSESSMENT PUN ARMY TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS aI SA4
SYSTEMS: TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS SERIES NO. 2. RADIO0TERMINEAL SET ANITRC-117
REQUIREMENTS FOR U.S. EUROPEAN C3 SUPPORT N-S 21 1(RFS UIREMENTS STUDY)
I ItUROPS AN C3 IMPLEMENTATION STUD Y, FINAL REPORT RSE4 A (NEQUIREMERTSSTEAIT
ADAPTABLE NF COMMIUNICATION SYSTEMS FOR USE IR1A 9.2 110 3NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENT
AIR DEFENSE MATERIE L EMP VULNERA81iLrY SURVEY OF 12.57 AARF v TACTICAL SYSTEMS
CENTRAL REGION AIR COMMAND AND CONTROL. INFORMATION 8-2.111 1 ISin ENTSTUDY)FLOW ANALYSID. PART I I I
61111tRAL REGION AIR COAND AND CORTROL. VOLUME %I $2.112 ? (REQUIREMENTS STUDVI
SECURITY AND SURVIVABILITY Of ?NEATER NUCLEAR 112.113 IFWEAPONS LOGISTICAL SUPPORT CAPABILITIES. DRAFTFINAL REPORTI 1
A DISCUSSION OF ISSUED OF TACTICAL NUCLEAR WARFARE 92.114 5 3EIIEAWSTIT
I ITNPF 12 COIINECArTOSPOEINAWM*ANAGEMENIT PLAN 8.2.11E 1 (REQUIREMENTS STUDY)
I IIBLIOGRAPHY OP RSA REPORTS ON TACTICAL PROGRAM N-SUE9 N 41INLIOSRAPNYI
1 120A/79W
I . . ,20
Table 1. Relationship of individual procjrams/ documents to
TNF S2C3 issues. (Continued)
SPECIFIC ISSUES
PROGRAM / DOCUMENT TITLE 4~. C,:g,
NUCLEAR SUIRVIVABLE C2
SYSTEM 1-2.7 1
ASSESSMIENT Of THE IMPA-T OF SURVEILLANCE AN" ELECTRONIC 8.2.8 BWARFARE SYSTEMS ON COMSAT OPERATIONS
AFWWMCCS EW. PHASE 11, FINAL. REPORT B-2.97 7
SOVIET GROUND FORCES COMMAND. CONTROL. AND COMEIUNI- 6-2.1CATIONS SYSTEMS AT THE TACTICAL LEVE L
COMMANOW CONTROL AND C OMMUNICATIONS FOR US NATO B-2.8 3TREATER NUCLEAR FORCES
1WRVU1NORASH.LIEY AD tOMEC POSTURE OF CS Of PERSHIING 3-2.73SYSTEM
ASSE SSMENT AND MODIELS OF MOBILE COMMAND POST B-2.29gSURVIVABILITY IN A TACTICAL NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENT.0DRAFT FINAL REPORT
RE RESINTATIVE COMMANT POST CONFIILGRATIONS C3 -2.41 11STRUCTURES AND REFERENCE DATA, VOLUME I
IN.A 'ASEf I- 5TDV OF THE EFFECT OF A TACTICAL NUCLEAR -2.76 4
NUCLEAR DOCTRINE. ORGANIZATION END EQUIPMENT INUOGREI -2.2732 IREDEIREMENTS STUEVICOMMANS0 AND CONTROL STUDY
COMMUNICATIO NS AND TARGET ACOUISITIOW CONCEPTS IN -298 3TACTICAL NUCLEAR WARFAREI I 1
TACTICAL RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM CONCEPT STUDY 8-2.0 3 IREDEIREMENTSSTUOVII I I
AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES IIRSTUDY. VOLUME IX, COMMAND. 8-2.101 2 (ARFO IREMEN IS TUOYICONTROL ANDo COliACAiNSAlssION RfOUIEEMENTS
TACTICAL AWACS MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS N2..NS
TNEATER NUCLEAR C3. VOLUME 1. FINAL REPORT B-SIR?2 N 6
TREATER NUCLEAR C3. VOLUME 11. APPENDICES RI2.NI 0
FACTOR U8IVOLVEDE N ATTLEFIELD ELECTROMAGRETIC A.2,560 BCOVER. AND DECEPTION IBELCAD). VOLUMES I AND If
I1I 20A/"W
21
Table 1. Relationship of individual programs/documents to
TNF S2C3 issues. (Continued)
SPECIFIC ISSUES AV
k171
PROGRAM /DOCUMENT TITLE
TITLE AND ABSTRACTS OF TECHNICAL REPORTS. TECHNICAL B-.106 6 (BIBLIOGRAPHYIMEMORANDA. ASO PROFESSIONAL PAPERS PUBLISHED BY THESHAPE TECHNICAL CENTER
JRSC EXECUTING COMMANOERS TERMINAL SYSTEM/ B. (RE UiNEMEITS STUOYISUSYSTEM ANALYSIS
AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES IMls STUDY. VOLUME IX. 12.17 2 (REUIREMNTSSTUOYCOMMAND. CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS MISSIONREDUIREMENTS (ANNEXES)
REPORT TO ATI C3
INITIATIVES TASK FORCE ON C1
NUCLEAR B-.0 NSUJRVIVABILITY ISSUES0
PRELIMINARY THEATER C3
NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY B-LiA 4ASSESSMENT O
THEATER NUCLEAR PROGRAMS SYNTHESIS. VOLUME 1. Bl2SS 7 (REQUIREMENTS STUDY)SYTHESIS REPORT I
THEATER NUCLEAR PROGRAMSSYNTHESIS. VOLUME II. B2 F(REOUIREMENTSTUY)STUDY SUMMARIES
FII
OPERATIONAL CONCEPT FOR THE TOMAHAWK GROUND RE2.132 6 IREOUIREMENTS STUOY)LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE
ANALYSISOF THE SURVIVABILITY AND VULNERABILITY 32130OF E3-% IN CENTRAL EUROPE
22
2.3 DISTRIBUTION OF PREVIOUS EFFORT
Figure 2 depicts graphically the number of compendium entries
which contain information pertinent to each of the tentatively identified
TNF S2 C3 specific issues. A separate bar portraying the number of more
comprehensive assessments of the TNF S2 C3--those identified as Require-
ments Studies in the Compendium-is also shown for purposes of comparison.
This information indicates the relative weight of effort previously
allocated to the study and evaluation of questions which are directly
related to the specific C3 issues. Figure 2 also indicates which specific
issues are candidates for further work and which are less candidates for
further study and evaluation than for integration with other work done
previously. For example, only three programs/documents in the compendium
directly address the specific issue of Interoperable US-NATO Secure Voice.
On the other hand, 46 programs/documents deal with the specific issue of
Physical Survivability and Security. This suggests that specific Inter-
operability issues may be candidates for further assessment before recom-
mendations on possible new programs, if needed, can be formulated. By
comparison, all that may need to be done in the area of the Physical Sur-
vivability and Security issue is to evaluate and coordinate previous pro-
grams to ensure that they have been assigned proper priority and adequate
funding. While the potential utility to the TNF S2 C3 Program Manager of
such comparisons is obvious, he will have to examine each candidate for
further assessment carefully on its own merits since those assessments that
have been conducted in a relatively little studied issue area may well be
so recent, comprehensive in treatment, or of such excellence as to preclude
the need for additional work. It must also be remembered, as indicated
previously, that the amount of i.nformation contained in different com-
pendium entries which deal with a particular specific issue may vary
markedly.
23
C CL
2 (A
C L/)r-
'4-
4-0
Cc B
2-4
OI
DISTRIBUTiON LIST
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (Continued)
U.S. Documents Officer, AFSOUTH Defense Nuclear AgencyATTN: U.S. Documents Officer ATTN: STSP
ATTN: STSSArmed Fortes Staff College ATTN: STRA
ATTN: Reference & Technical Services Branch ATTN: VLISATTN: Dept. of Command Control & Communications ATTN: DDST
ATTN: OASOAssistant Secretary of Defense ATTN: STVLComm., Cmd., Cont. & Intell. ATTN: STNA
ATTN: Surveillance & Warning Systems 4 cy ATTN: TITLATTN: Assistant for NATO C3ATTN: Strat. & Theater C&C System Defense Technical Information Center
2 cy ATTN: DDAssistant Secretary of DefenseProgram Analysis & Evaluation Field Command
ATTN: General Purpose Programs Defense Nuclear AgencyATTN: FCPR
Assistant to the Secretary of Defense ATTN: FCP-FCPRKAtomic Energy
ATTN: Executive Assistant Field CommandATTN: B. Adams Defense Nuclear Agency
Livermore DivisionCommand & Control Technical Center Li Tmr D CPso
ATTN: C-610 ATTN: FCPRL
ATT(A. C-65 Interservice Nuclear Weapons SchoolATTN: C-300ATTN: C-330 ATTN: 1TV
Commander-in-Chief, U.S. European Command Joint Chiefs of StaffATTN: J-2-FTD ATTN: Is, Nuclear Divisiu,ATTN: J-2 ATTN: SAGAATTN: J-6 ATTN: J-3, WWMCCS Evaluation OfficeATTN: ECJ-6-OJ ATTN: J-3, Nuclear Contingency BranchATTN: J-5NPG ATTN: 3-3ATTN: J-3 ATTN: J-3, NMCCATTN: ECa6-OP ATTN: J-3, WWMCCS Council Support Office
Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Joint Strat. Tgt. Planning StaffATTN: J-54 ATTN: JLTW-2ATTN: 3-2 ATTN: JPSTATTN: 3-6 ATTN: NRI-STINFO, LibraryATTN: J-3 ATTN: JSAS
2 cy ATTN: JL
Defense Advanced Rsch. Proj. Agency Joint Tactical Communications Ofc.ATTN: TIO ATTN: TT-E-SS
Defense Communications Agency National Communications SystemATTN: Code 530 ATTN: NCS-TSATTN: Code 5OBATTN: Code 520 National Security AgencyATTN: Code 510 ATTN: R-52, 0. Van GuntenATTN: Code 410 ATTN: TDLATTN: Code 205
Defense Communications Engineer Center Net AssessmentATTN: Code R720 Office of the Secretary of DefenseATTN: Code R400 ATTN: Military Assistants
ATTN: Code R123 U.S. Forces Korea
Defense Intelligence Agency ATTN: CJ-P-G
ATTN: DT-4B ATTN: DJ-AM-SMATT4: RDS-3Acy ATTN: OT-IB U.S. National Military Representative, SHAPEATTN: U.S. Documents Officer
2
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (Continued)
Undersecretary of Defense for Rsch. & Engrg. U.S. Army Concepts Analysis AgencyATTN: Research & Adv. Tech. ATTN: Code 605/606ATTN: Strategic & Space Systems (OS)ATTN: Tactical Warfare Programs U.S. Army Electronics Rsch. & Dev. Command
ATTN: DRCPM-TDS-SDWWMCCS System Engineering Org. ATTN: DRCPM-ATC
ATTN: WWMCCS/SEECommander-in-Chief
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. Army Europe and Seventh ArmyATTN: DCSOPS-AEAGC-D
Asst. Chief of Staff for Intelligence ATTN: ODCSE-E-AEAGEDepartment of the Army ATTN: DCSOPS-AEAGB
ATTN: DAMI-FI ATTN: DCSOPS-AEAGC-DSWATTN: DCSOPS-AEAGD-MM
Atmospheric Sciences LaboratoryU.S. Army Electronics R&D Command U.S. Army Materiel Sys. Analysis Activity
ATTN: DELAS-AS ATTN: DRXSY-SATTN: DRXSY-DS
Deputy Chief of Staff for Ops. & PlansDepartment of the Army U.S. Army Missile R&D Command
ATTN: DAMO-PDW ATTN: DRSMI-YDRATTN: DAMO-ZDATTN: DAMO-RQC U.S. Army Nuclear & Chemical AgencyATTN: DAMO-SSP ATTN: Library for MONA-WED
ATTN: Library for MONA-SALDeputy Chief of Staff for Rsch. Dev. & Acq. ATTN: LibraryDepartment of the Army
ATTN: Advisor for RDA Analysis, M. Gale U.S. Army Satellite Comm. AgencyATTN: DAMA-CSS-N ATTN: TACSAT Office
ATTN: DRCPM-SC-11Harry Diamond LaboratoriesDepartment of the Army U.S. Army TRADOC Systems Analysis Activity
ATTN: DELHD-N-CO ATTN: ATAA-TACATTN: DELHD-N-RBHATTN: DELHD-N-RBA U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Comd.ATTN: DELHD-N-P ATTN: ATCD-ZATTN: DELHD-I-TL ATTN: Technical Library
2 cy ATTN: DELHD-N-EMU.S. Army War College
Multi Service Communications Systems ATTN: LibraryDepartment of the Army
ATTN: DRCPM-MSCS-APB, M. Francis V CorpsDepartment of the Army
U.S. Army Ballistic Research Labs. ATTN: AETVCEATTN: DRDAR-VL ATTN: AETVGBATTN: CAL ATTN: AETVGCATTN: TBL
VII CorpsU.S. Army Comb. Arms Combat Dev. Acty. Department of the Army
ATTN: ATCA-CFT ATTN: AETSCEATTN: ATCA-CO ATTN: AETSGB-OATTN: ATCA-CA ATTN: AETSGC
U.S. Army Comd. & General Staff College DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYATTN: ATSW-TA-D
Command & Control ProgramsU.S. Army Comm-Elec. Engrg. Instal. Agency Department of the Navy
ATTN: CCC-EMEO-PED ATTN: OP 941ATTN: CCC-SEOATTN: CCC-PRSO Naval Ocean Systems Center
Department of the NavyU.S. Army Communications Command ATTN: Research Library
ATTN: CC-OPS-WRATTN: CC-OPS-SM Naval Surface Weapons Center
ATTN: Code F31U.S. Army Communications Sys. Agency
ATTN: CCM-AD-LB
26
I14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE (Continued)
Office of the Chief of Naval Operations Tactical Air CommandATTN: OP 96 Department of the Air ForceATTN: OP 94 ATTN: DRAATTN: OP 604 E/F
Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Air Forces in EuropeCommander-in-Chief, i.S. Atlantic Fleet ATTN: DOC
ATTN: Code J54 ATTN: XPXXATTN: Code J-611A
Ballistic Missile OfficeCommander-in-Chief, U.S. Naval Forces, Europe Air Force Systems Command
ATTN: N3262, Nuclear Surety Officer ATTN: MRBM
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY
Air Force Geophysics Laboratory Central Intelligence AgencyATTN: SULL ATTN: OSR/SF, R. Virgo
ATTN: OSR/SECAir Force Weapons Laboratory ATTN: DS]/LSD, R. HartAir Force Systems Comand
ATTN: OYC DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTORS
ATTN: SULBDM Corp.
Assistant Chief of Staff ATTN: W. SweeneyIntelligence ATTN: Corporate LibraryDepartment of the Air Force ATTN: D. Poe
ATTN4: INAK ATTN: R. CarlinATTN: R. MacOnie
Assistant Chief of Staff ATTN: J. WilsonStudies & Analyses ATTN: W. WhangDepartment of the Air Force ATTN: C. Campbell
ATTN: AF/SASC ATTN: A. ReeseATTN: AF/SAGF ATTN: T. Julian
ATTN: P. DittmerDeputy Chief of StaffOperationi Plans and Readiness Boeing Co.Department of the Air Force ATTN: R. Scheppe
ATTN: AFXOXFMATTN: AFXOK 66th MI Group
ATTN: RDA/MunichDeputy Chief of StaffResearch, Development, & Acq. Computer Sciences Corp.Department of the Air Force ATTN: Security Officer for H. Blank
ATTN: AFRDQSM ATTN: Library
Electronic Systems Division ESL, Inc.Department of the Air Force ATTN: J. Marshall
ATTN: XRC ATTN: Library
Foreign Technology Division General Electric Co.-TEMPOAir Force Systems Coemand ATTN- DASIAC
ATTN: NIIS, Library
General Electric Co. -TEMPOHeadquarters Space Division ATTN: DASIACAir Force Systems Command
ATTN: SKA Institute for Defense AnalysesATTN: D. Signori
Headquarters Space Division ATTN: Classified LibraryAir Force Systems Command
ATTN: YCPC Kaman Sciences Corp.ATTN: D. Choate
Strategic Air CommandDepartment of the Air Force RCA Corp.
ATTN: XPFS ATTN: E. Van KeurenATTN: NRTATTN: DCXT
27
i
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTORS (Continued) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTORS (Continued)
R & 0 Associates SRI internationalATTN: R. Poll ATTN: W. JayeATTN: R. Schaefer ATTNz C. ShoensATTN: Technical tnl'ornwation CenterATTN: R. Latter TRW~. Defense & Space Sys. GroupATTN: C. MacDonald ATTN: W. Rowan
R & 0AssocatesTRW Defense & Space Sys. GroupATTN: L. Delaney AT:~ yhATTN: A. Cicolani
mm"8