Upload
daniel-kanter
View
219
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Roger CrawfordRoger Crawford3500 Porsche Way, Suite 2003500 Porsche Way, Suite 200Ontario, CA 91764Ontario, CA 91764909.989.8584909.989.8584Roger.Crawford@[email protected]
AB 646’s Impact On ImpasseProcedures Under the
MMBA(Mandated Factfinding)
December 2011December 2011
Best Best & Krieger LLPBest Best & Krieger LLP
Joseph SanchezJoseph Sanchez655 West Broadway, 15th Floor655 West Broadway, 15th FloorSan Diego, CA 92101San Diego, CA 92101619.525.1372619.525.1372Joseph.Sanchez@[email protected]
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Public Employer Labor Relations
• Meyers Milias Brown Act (MMBA)– Gov’t. Code 3500, et seq.
• Educational Employment Relations Act(EERA) Gov’t. Code 3540, et seq.
• Public Employment Relations Board (PERB)
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Duty to Bargain
• MMBA requires public employers andrecognized labor associations to meet andconfer in good faith on matters within the“scope of representation.”
• Mandatory subjects of bargaining:
– Wages, hours, and other terms and conditions ofemployment.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
MMBA-Impasse Procedures Prior toAB 646
• Impasse: when the parties, after meeting and conferring ingood faith, reach the point at which further discussions wouldbe fruitless.
• MMBA permits an agency to implement its “last, best, andfinal offer” after impasse procedures are concluded.
• Impasse procedures based on local rules/CBA
• Mediation (optional) (Govt . Code 3505.2)
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
MMBA-Impasse Procedures AfterAB 646
• “If the mediator is unable to effect settlement of thecontroversy within 30 days after his or her appointment, theemployee organization may request that the parties’differences be submitted to a factfinding panel.”
– Is mediation still optional?
– Can factfinding be avoided by not agreeing to mediation?
– What happens to local impasse rules previously established?
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
MMBA-Impasse Procedures AfterAB 646
• Within 5 days of factfinding request each party mustselect a person to serve as its member of thefactfinding panel.
• PERB will select chairperson (neutral) of panelwithin 5 days of selection of parties’ panel members.
• Parties may agree on different chairperson within 5days after PERB makes selection.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
MMBA-Impasse Procedures AfterAB 646
• The Panel shall, within 10 days, after appointment,meet with the parties, either jointly or separately, andmay make inquires and investigations, hold hearings,and take any other steps it deems appropriate.
– Panel shall have power to issue subpoenas.
– The agency shall furnish panel with all relevant documentsupon request.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
FACTFINDING CRITERIA
• State and federal laws that are applicable tothe employer.
• Local rules, regulations, or ordinances.
• Stipulations of parties.
• The interests and welfare of the public andthe financial ability of the public agency.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
FACTFINDING CRITERIA
• Comparison of the wages, hours, and conditions ofemployment with other employees performing similarservices in comparable public agencies.
• CPI.
• The overall compensation presently received by theemployees. (Total Compensation)
• Any other facts which are normally or traditionally takeninto consideration in making the findings orrecommendations.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
FF Panel Recommendations OnlyAdvisory-Not Binding
• If dispute is not settled within 30 days afterappointment of factfinding panel, the panel shallmake findings of fact and recommended terms ofsettlement, which shall be advisory only.
• Panel shall submit findings to parties before they aremade available to public.
• Agency shall make findings publically availablewithin 10 days of receipt.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Unilateral Implementation FollowingFactfinding
• After applicable mediation and factfindingprocedures have been exhausted the agencymay implement its last, best, and final offer.
• Must wait 10 days after factfinding report submitted toparties.
• Must hold public impasse hearing.
• Cannot implement an “MOU.”
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Additional Provisions UnderAB 646
• Factfinding provisions not applicable tocharter cities or counties with impasseprocedures in charter that provide for bindingarbitration.
• Costs of panel chairperson equally dividedbetween parties.
• Peace Officer Unions not exempt from thefactfinding requirement.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Impact of AB 646
• Longer negotiation period if labor requestsfactfinding (approx. 100 days)
• Preparation for negotiations must start muchearlier than before.
• Preparation for negotiations will be more datadriven. Financial management staff may needto be more involved.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Avoiding Delay in NegotiationsProcess
• Revise local rules if possible regarding factfindingtimelines.
• Set ground rules prior to negotiations regardingtimelines.
• Possible PERB Regulations regarding timeline torequest factfinding.
• Notice impasse hearing if delay in factfindingrequest.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Selection of Panel Chair
• Possible PERB Regulations.
• Research the proposed Panel Chair.
• Attempt to reach agreement with Union onPanel Chair
– Strikeout method
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Selection of Agency Panel Member
• Strong oral advocacy skills
• Solid understanding of labor relations andscope of bargaining issues
• Solid understanding of economic issues
• Usually member of negotiating team
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
What To Expect at FactfindingHearing
• Panel Chair conducts proceedings
• Generally informal
• Relaxed rules of evidence
• Each side will have opportunity to present evidenceon issues in dispute. Usually party who proposedissue will go first
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Preparation for FF Hearing
• Select appropriate spokesperson (usuallyattorney)
• Prepare Factfinding Binder/Notebook(Exhibits)
• Determine who would be appropriatewitnesses for agency
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
What to do now.
• Review employer-employee relations policy.Consider revisions to impasse resolutionprocedure.
• Review existing memoranda of understanding.Identify window periods for the meet andconfer process.
• Keep a record of changes you want for nextMOU.
• Gather evidence.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
What to do prior to negotiations.
• Keep governing body informed of procedure,including realistic timelines.
• Strategize. Ask how likely that these negotiationswill go to impasse.
• Develop proposals and gather supporting evidence.
• Involve Finance Director on economic issues andother managers on non-economic issues. (These arepotential witnesses in the event of fact-finding.)
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
What to do during negotiations
• Steer clear of conduct that could be construed as an unfairpractice. Respond properly to information requests.
• Gather supporting evidence for proposals as they changethroughout the meet and confer process. Organize and preparethis evidence as if fact-finding were inevitable.
• Consult with proper management personnel about unionobjections and counter proposals.
• Make sure you are truly at impasse. This may take time.
• Begin preparation for potential public information campaign.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Preparation for fact-finding --revisited.
• Identify issues to be presented to panel.
• Select qualified panel member.
• Organize and gather evidence.
• Prepare witnesses.
• Consider preparing a pre-hearing written brief.
• Continue preparation of public informationcampaign.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
What to do after fact-finding.
• During 10-day period following fact-finding,finalize public information campaign andprepare for public impasse hearing.
• Meet and confer with union; submit (re-submit) last, best, and final offer.
AB 646’s Impact on Impasse Procedures Under the MMBA
Questions