15
© 2017 The Aerospace Corporation Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update Marc Hayhurst, Brian Wood, Shirin Eftekharzadeh The Aerospace Corporation Cindy Daniels, Lissa Jordin, Washito Sasamoto, Waldo Rodriguez NASA Langley Research Center Science Office for Mission Assessments (SOMA) August 29 th , 2017

Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

© 2017 The Aerospace Corporation

Mission Operations Cost

Estimation Tool (MOCET)

FY17 Update

Marc Hayhurst, Brian Wood, Shirin EftekharzadehThe Aerospace Corporation

Cindy Daniels, Lissa Jordin, Washito Sasamoto, Waldo RodriguezNASA Langley Research Center

Science Office for Mission Assessments (SOMA)

August 29th, 2017

Page 2: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

2

Topics

• MOCET Overview & Status

• Updates in MOCET v1.2

• Public Release of MOCET

• User Community

• Summary & Future Work

Page 3: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

3

MOCET Overview

• The Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET)

– A capability for Phase E estimation jointly developed by The Aerospace Corporation and NASA

Science Office for Mission Assessments (SOMA)

– Based on actual costs of historical missions with emphasis on competed missions

– Constructed by breaking the mission operations cost into the various phases

– Has few subjective inputs

– Estimates total Phase E mission cost

– Implemented entirely in Excel and requires no additional software or tools

– Also includes a user manual which provides additional instruction and background

Mar-34 Oct-34 Apr-35 Nov-35 May-36 Dec-36 Jun-37

Cruise

Approach/EDL

First Landed Month

Landed Prime Operations

Mars 2034 Rover

Mission Schedule

Download from ONCE Model Portal

https://oncedata.msfc.nasa.gov

Now available external to NASA via

https://software.nasa.gov

For more information:

Email: [email protected]

M. R. Hayhurst et al., "Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET)," 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, 2017, pp. 1-13.

Page 4: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

4

Presentation at NASA Cost Symposium

2015

MOCET v1.0 release

MOCET Timeline

MOCET v1.1 release

MOCET User’s Workshop 1

NASA Cost Symposium

2016 v1.1 Demo

MOCET User’s Workshop 2

MOCET v1.2 release;

IEEE Conf.

Initial approval for MOCET

public release

NASA Cost and Schedule

Symposium 2017

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2015

2016

2017

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Page 5: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

5

MOCET Mission Types Database Overview

Mission/CER Type Program Missions

Planetary

Discovery MESSENGER, Stardust, Deep Impact, GRAIL, NEAR, Dawn (updated Orbital Ops)

Mars Scout Phoenix

Robotic Lunar Exploration LRO, LADEE

New Frontiers New Horizons, Juno (Cruise, Orbit Insertion), OSIRIS-REx

Mars Exploration MRO, Odyssey, MER, MSL, MAVEN (updated Orbital Ops)

Outer Planets Flagship Cassini (Orbit Insertion)

Earth Science

Earth System Science Pathfinder (ESSP) GRACE, CloudSat, CALIPSO, Aquarius, OCO-2, CYGNSS

Earth Systematic Missions (ESM) Aqua, Aura, Terra, Jason-1, OSTM, ICESat, GPM, SMAP, Jason-3

Explorers

Mission of Opportunity (MO) Suazku (ASTRO-E2), TWINS, CINDI

Small Explorers (SMEX) NuSTAR, IRIS, IBEX, AIM, GALEX, RHESSI

Medium Explorers (MIDEX) THEMIS, Swift, WISE

Near Earth Discovery

Helio-Astro

Discovery Genesis, Kepler

Solar Terrestrial Probes (STP) STEREO, TIMED, MMS

Living With a Star (LWS) RBSP, SDO

Cosmic Origins Spitzer

Physics of the Cosmos Fermi, Chandra

Bold = New Data in version 1.2 Potential New Data for version 1.X

– NASA SAP Business

Warehouse

• Monthly Expenditures

– Monthly Flight Project Reviews (FPR)

and Monthly Status Reviews (MSR)

• Monthly Expenditures, Mission Events

& Schedule

– NASA Cost Analysis Data

Requirements (CADRe)

• Project development costs used

to assign mission class

Data Sources Utilized and Consulted

Page 6: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

6

MOCET v1.2 CERs Updates

CER Name New

Data

New Eq.

Form

No

Change

Comments

Cruise CER X Minor update with complete Juno Cruise Phase Data

Approach/Orbit Insertion/Reduction CER XJuno incorporated along with Cassini and “Outer Planets”

input option

Orbital Operations CER XUpdated Dawn & MAVEN data incorporated. “IsMars?”

variable determined to be no longer significant.

Flyby/Encounter CER X

Approach EDL CER X

First Landed Month CER X

Landed Prime Operations X

Data/Sample Analysis & Archiving X

Extended Orbital Ops CER X

Extended Landed Ops CER X

CER Name New

Data

New Eq.

Form

No

Change

Comments

Earth/Near-Earth Orbiting Checkout CER X

Earth Science Prime Operations CER X

Explorer Prime Operations CER X

Near Earth Discovery Helio Astro Prime Operations CER X

Planetary

Earth/Near-Earth Orbiting

Page 7: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

7

MOCET v1.2 Update

• MOCET CERs and tool were updated to include new Juno data and released as v1.2

– Additional data from prime missions accumulated since v1.1 were also included: Dawn, MAVEN

– The same statistical processes used for v1.1 were applied to this update

– The new v1.2 CERs have been benchmarked against v1.1

– Overall the performance of the v1.2 updates is about the same as v1.1

• This update affected three CERs

– Nominal/Quiescent Cruise CER

• Updated to include the complete Juno Cruise Phase

• Resulted in only a minor change to the coefficients

– Approach/Orbit Insertion/Reduction

• The Juno Jupiter Orbit Insertion phase is now included in this CER

• It was also possible to include the Cassini mission which resulted in better performance of the CER

• Resulted in change in coefficients and the addition of a new variable

– Orbital Operations

• Only four months of Juno operations at Jupiter were available to include into this CER

– At this time recommend waiting until more data is accumulated to include Juno in this CER

• Rates for Dawn and MAVEN were updated with monthly data since the last update.

• An update to the MAVEN payload mass input variable value was also performed per user feedback

• Resulted in updates of coefficients and elimination of one variable due to new data and significance testing

Page 8: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

8

Nominal/Quiescent Cruise Prime Phase CER

• CER Function:

• Goodness of Fit

• Database

IQILY *7836.0*8624.02537.1

Variable Name Units Definition

Y Cost FY13 $M

Planetary mission average monthly prime nominal or quiescent cruise

phase cost

IL IsLarge? 0 or 1 Is this mission a large mission class per MOCET definitions?

IQ IsQuiescent? 0 or 1 Is this cruise period a quiescent mode?

Measure Value

Regression Method OLS

Standard Error (RSS) 0.20

Average Percentage Bias 0.0%

Coefficient of Determination (R^2) 0.92

Adjusted R^2 0.87

Pearson's Correlation Sqd (r^2) 0.92

Number of Observations 6

Number of Input Variables 2

1. MESSENGER – Nominal (IL 0, IQ 0) 4. New Horizons – Nominal (IL 1, IQ 0) 7. GRAIL (A/B) – (IL 0, IQ 0)*

2. Dawn - Nominal (IL 0, IQ 0) 5. Stardust - Quiescent (IL 0, IQ 1)** 8. Cassini – (IL 0, IQ 0)***

3. Juno - Nominal (IL 1, IQ 0) 6. New Horizons - Quiescent (IL 1, IQ 1)

Additional Notes• Some missions may have nominal, quiescent, and checkout periods of cruise. Each of these phases should be broken out and estimated separately (e.g. 4 months of cruise with checkout, 12 months of

nominal cruise, 36 months of quiescent ops.)

• *GRAIL was not included in the model due using multiple spacecraft. At this time there is not sufficient data to recommend an adjustment for multiple planetary spacecraft and the model does not support

estimation of planetary multiple spacecraft missions

• **Stardust cruise considered as quiescent during the original prime mission. Limited data was available about the original mission so this assumption is based on description of the NEXT Mission.

• ***Cassini was not included in the CER since it the only example of a flagship class mission currently available

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

$- $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50

Pre

dic

ted

Actual

Page 9: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

9

Approach, Orbit Insertion, Reduction Prime Phase CER

• CER Function:

• Goodness of Fit

• Database

OPPCY *2668.1*9478.05024.0

Variable Name Units Definition

Y Cost FY13 $M Planetary mission average monthly prime orbital operations phase cost

PC Preceding Cruise FY13 $M Average monthly cost of the preceding cruise phase

OP OuterPlanets? 0 or 1 Is the orbit insertion being done at one of the outer planets (beyond Mars)?

Measure Value

Regression Method OLS

Standard Error (RSS) 0.16

Average Percentage Bias 0.0%

Coefficient of Determination (R^2) 0.99

Adjusted R^2 0.99

Pearson's Correlation Sqd (r^2) 0.99

Number of Observations 8

Number of Input Variables 2

Additional Notes• None

1. MESSENGER – MOI (PC $1.53, OP 0) 4. MAVEN – MOI (PC $1.98, OP 0) 7. Juno – JOI (PC $2.03, OP 1)

2. Dawn – Vesta (PC $0.98, OP 0) 5. GRAIL – LOI (PC $1.60, OP 0) 6. Cassini – SOI (PC $6.85, OP 1)

3. Dawn – Ceres (PC $0.97, OP 0) 6. MRO – MOI (PC $5.03, OP 0)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

$- $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 $8.00 $10.00

Pre

dic

ted

Actual

Page 10: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

10

Orbital Operations Prime Phase CER

• CER Function:

• Goodness of Fit

• Database

PMY *0157.0016.1

Variable Name Units Definition

Y Cost FY13 $M Planetary mission average monthly prime orbital operations phase cost

PM Payload Mass* kg > 0 Mass of payload portion for which NASA will fund operations

1. MESSENGER (PM 47.2) 4. MAVEN (PM 67.3) 7. LRO (PM 97.1)

2. Mars Odyssey (PM 44.3) 5. Dawn (PM 21.0) 9.GRAIL (PM 17.7)

3. LADEE (PM 49.6) 6. MRO (PM 134.0) 10. Cassini (PM 337.7)**

Additional Notes• Radio Science experiments generally are part of the S/C telecom system and do not need to be considered when totaling up the payload mass. Only include the mass of instruments for which NASA is

performing operations.

• **GRAIL was not included in the model due to using multiple spacecraft. At this time there is not sufficient data to recommend an adjustment for multiple planetary spacecraft and the model does not support

estimation of planetary multiple spacecraft missions

• ***Cassini was not included in the CER since it the only example of a flagship class mission currently available

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

$- $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00

Pre

dic

ted

Actual

Measure Value

Regression Method GERM ZMPE

Standard Error of the Estimate 11.0%

Average Percentage Bias 0.0%

Pearson's Correlation Sqd (r^2) 0.86

Number of Observations 7

Number of Input Variables 1

Page 11: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

11

• The model was compared against actual mission costs to gauge performance

• Standard Deviation for all missions was found to be 20% (v1.1: 20%, v1.0: 25%)

• Planetary: 26% (v1.1: 27%, v1.0: 32%)

• Earth/Near Earth Orbiting: 16% (v1.0: 22%, No changes in v1.2)

Performance of v1.2 is about the same as v1.1

Overall Model Performance

v1.2

v1.1

Page 12: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

12

Public Release of MOCET

• MOCET has been approved for public release via

software.nasa.gov

– The direct link can be found here:

https://software.nasa.gov/software/LAR-18894-1

• Now available to U.S. contractors and universities

etc.

• User must create an account on software.nasa.gov

• Fill out the request form

• Signature authority for a business cannot be an

engineer or those with similar titles

– An authorized signature authority is considered

• president of the company

• general counsel

• or contract officer

• Rules may be different depending on type of

institution

– Academic/University

– Individual Contractor etc.

• Contact MOCET help staff at [email protected] with

issues

Page 13: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

13

Downloads vs. Time

• To date MOCET has been downloaded from ONCE 106* times since the initial release

• *Includes all downloads from all users including users that may be currently inactive

• Version 1.0 was downloaded 30 times between October 2015 and March 2016

• Version 1.1 has been downloaded 60 times from March 2016 to April 2017

• Version 1.2 has been downloaded 16 times from April 2017 to June 2017

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Cumulative Downloads

10

0

2

7

3

12

10

7

4

0

3

11

6

7

0

5

1 1

9

3

4

00

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Downloads by Month

v 1.0 Release v 1.1 Release v 1.0 Release v 1.1 ReleaseNCS 2016 NCS 2016v 1.2 Release v 1.2 Release

Page 14: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

14

Users vs. Time

• As of June 2017, 59 unique users have downloaded MOCET from ONCE

• Since the release of v1.0 the number of users has increased steadily

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Cumulative New Users

12

0

2

5

3 3

4 4

1

0

2

3

6

3

0

5

0 0

1

2

3

00

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

New Users by Month

v 1.0 Release v 1.1 Release v 1.0 Release v 1.1 ReleaseNCS 2016 NCS 2016v 1.2 Release v 1.2 Release

Page 15: Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET) FY17 Update...Jun 28, 2016  · 2016 v1.1 Demo MOCET User’s Workshop 2 MOCET v1.2 release; IEEE Conf. Initial approval for MOCET public

15

Summary & Next Steps

• New data has been added and the updated model has been released as MOCET v1.2

• MOCET v1.2 performs about the same as v1.1

• MOCET has been released publicly via software.nasa.gov

• MOCET IEEE paper* has been published for further background on the model

• MOCET will continue to be periodically updated with new mission data

• Model is currently being used by both evaluators and proposers

• We will continue to engage and grow the user community

Download MOCET

ONCE Model Portal https://oncedata.msfc.nasa.gov

Now available external to NASA via https://software.nasa.gov

For More Information

Demo session (see agenda for time and room)

Email: [email protected]

*M. R. Hayhurst et al., "Mission Operations Cost Estimation Tool (MOCET)," 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, 2017, pp. 1-13.