Misc. Issues in Speech; International Issues Fall 2014 CS
340
Slide 2
Misc. Free Speech Issue: Anonymous Speech Anonymous publishing
as a First Amendment right McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission US
S. Ct 1995 http://gilc.org/speech/anonymous/ Online speech,
accomplished using remailers A series of servers that strip our
identifying info & sub in anonymous code or random
numbers.(chained remailing)
Slide 3
Does the First Amendment give you the right to speak
anonymously online? Yes, but you do not have the right to speak
falsely & injuriously. example below:
Slide 4
Misc. Free Speech Issue: Students right to free speech Faked
profiles Mix of rulings: no clear standard on what is prohibited
Fake MySpace profile for a Texas principal Draker v. Schreibner
Facebook parody profile of principal Trosch by high school student
Layshock v. Hermitage School District 14 y o middle school student
created fake MySpace J.S. v. Blue Mountain School
http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/03/suspension_for_1.htm
Application of Tinker v. Des Moines (1969 US S. Ct. case). Black
armbands & school ban Students are persons under the
Constitution Rights not left at the school house gate School must
base decision on the likelihood of disruption of education
environment and intrusion of others.
Slide 5
Other standards for student speech: Fraser standard (1986)
student lewd speech distinguishing "vulgar" speech from the pure
"political" speech in Tinker Hazelwood standard (1988) school paper
case educators do not offend the First Amendment by exercising
editorial control over the style and content of student speech in
school-sponsored expressive activities so long as their actions are
reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns."
Slide 6
Finkel v. Dauber 2010, NY case Secret Facebook group Victim of
the bullying sues for defamation http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archi
ves/2010/07/private_faceboo.htm http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archi
ves/2010/07/private_faceboo.htm Outcome?
Slide 7
Free speech challenges for student speech consider A.The kind
of speech (political, vulgarity) B.The likelihood of disruption to
the academic environment C.The rights of those around the student
D.All of the above E.Nothing. Students do not have free speech
rights 30
Slide 8
Misc. Free Speech Issue: Employees right to free speech Article
http://www.hrexaminer.com/is-there-free-speech-at-work/http://www.hrexaminer.com/is-there-free-speech-at-work/
Remember, the First Amendment protects against government
regulation of speech. The First Amendment is not always relevant in
work place issues. Many employees are at will employees and are not
protected by labor laws. For governmental employees, there is a
right to discuss working conditions EMT fired; found firing was
improper http://nyti.ms/djca6U Distinguish conditions discussion
from mere venting NJ first grade teacher properly fired for saying
she felt like a warden overseeing future criminals
http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2013/01/tenured_school_1.htm
Bartender example (see next slide)
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/technology/employers-social-media-policies-come-under-regulatory-scrutiny.html?pagewanted=all
Slide 9
Bartender, unhappy about receiving no raise in 5 years, posts
on Facebook that his customers are rednecks and hopes they choke on
glass as they drive home drunk. Classify this. A.Discussion of
working conditions B.Personal venting 30
Slide 10
Free Speech Issue: When beliefs contradict law Amish stance on
technology adoption. Wisconsin v. Yoder exemption for school
Wisconsin v. Yoder What about requiring the Amish to use
technology? Mandatory, reflective traffic triangles on buggies
Traffic triangles. Watch:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/01/02/amish-sects-buggies-traffic-burden-for-some-kentucky-
residents/
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/01/02/amish-sects-buggies-traffic-burden-for-some-kentucky-
residents/
Slide 11
Opinion: Should the Amish be required to display the triangles
when on public roads? A.Yes B.No C.Im conflicted (unsure) 30
Result: Kentucky Supreme CourtKentucky Supreme Court
Reasoning:
Slide 12
International Issues Imagine facing a sentence of 10 years in
jail, because you suggested to your twitter followers that they
attend a political gathering and protest? Deviant ideology; hostile
to the government
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/world/meast/saudi-arabia-twitter-
jail/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/world/meast/saudi-arabia-twitter-
jail/index.html?hpt=hp_t2 Imagine a country prohibiting a kind of
speech lawful in the US and an American company creating the
software to make that speech blocked. Would this present an ethical
dilemma for that companys employees?
Slide 13
International Issues: State Mandated Censorship Book section
7.8 Filtering: the interception and removal of messages in a
network to prevent them from reaching their destination Yahoo! was
within its legal rights to choose to take the items that were
illegal in France off the market for everybody, even though the
items were legal in the United States. 13Ethics in a Computing
Culture
Slide 14
Political Censorship (continued) Yahoo! argued that because
they were doing business in China, they were obligated to obey
Chinese law. Do you accept that argument? Suppose Google, Yahoo!,
and Microsoft were all doing business in China and the Chinese
government required them to intentionally exclude any sites on
Chinas banned list from appearing in the search results of any
query anywhere in the world; all three agreed in order to continue
doing business in China. 14Ethics in a Computing Culture
Slide 15
The Arab Spring A.Is the time to plant your crops in the Middle
East B.Is a new brand of soap C.Is a new fragrance for womens
deodorant D.None of the above 30
Slide 16
Political Speech International Issues:
http://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/issues/censorship-and-free-speech
Page 253: Arab Spring Use of Internet social media communications
to orchestrate protests, overthrow of governments & circumvent
state control Tunisia, Egypt & Libya Interesting documentary:
How Facebook Changed the World The Arab Spring. (We will watch part
of this in class.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnPR90dJ3Gk
Slide 17
WikiLeaks
Slide 18
Is your current opinion of WikiLeaks positive or negative?
A.Positive B.Mostly positive C.Mostly Negative D.Negative E.I dont
know enough yet to have an opinion. 30
Slide 19
Is your current opinion of Julian Assange positive or negative?
A.Positive B.Mostly positive C.Mostly Negative D.Negative E.I dont
know enough yet to have an opinion. 30
Slide 20
WikiLeaks Online publisher/repository of secret information,
news leaks, and classified material. Launched in 2006 Founder
Julian Assange
Interview on Colbert Report http://www.colbertnation.com/the-
colbert-report-videos/270712/april- 12-2010/julian-assange
http://www.colbertnation.com/the-
colbert-report-videos/270712/april- 12-2010/julian-assange
Slide 24
Assanges Current Legal Problem Currently fighting extradition
from UK to Sweden for prosecution of possible sex crimes possible
sex crimes holed up at Ecuadors Embassy in London since June 2012
holed up That is roughly 827 days and counting In 2013, ran for a
seat in the Australian senate. Lost as earned about 1% of the vote.
BBC Interview with Assange on his status. Start 1:18 into this link
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-29258834
Slide 25
Is your current opinion of Chelsea (ne Bradley) Manning
positive or negative? A.Positive B.Mostly positive C.Mostly
Negative D.Negative E.I dont know enough yet to have an opinion.
30
Slide 26
Bradley Manning: the Charges Aiding the enemy Making
information accessible to the enemy Failure to obey a lawful
order/regulation (computer system mods, improper storage Violating
the Espionage Act Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Embezzlement/Theft
Slide 27
Judge or Jury Trial Manning waived his right to a jury trial.
Why do you think he made that choice?
Slide 28
Pre-trial Incarceration conditions 1,294 days Harsh treatment
Was argued by his team that the charges should be dropped because
of torture [nudity, isolation, harassment, sleep- deprivation,
conditions]
Slide 29
Verdict Plead guilty to some charges Convicted under Espionage
Act, disseminating classified field reports, State Dept cables,
assessments of detainees at Guantanamo Acquitted of most serious
charge: aiding the enemy See table:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
srv/special/national/manning-verdict/?hpid=z1http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
srv/special/national/manning-verdict/?hpid=z1
Slide 30
Sentencing 35 years. Gets credit for his 1,294 days plus 112
days for his mistreatment Must serve 1/3 of sentence before parole
eligibility Reduction in rank, dishonorable discharge, forfeit of
pay & benefits Mannings statement:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/08/21-7
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/08/21-7
Slide 31
I was Bradley Manning Daniel Ellsberg Editorial written by
Ellsberg http://www.theguardian.com/com
mentisfree/cifamerica/2011/mar/ 11/bradley-manning-wikileaks
http://www.theguardian.com/com mentisfree/cifamerica/2011/mar/
11/bradley-manning-wikileaks http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2
012/12/04/bradley-manning- daniel-ellsberg-pentagon-
papers_n_2240016.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2
012/12/04/bradley-manning- daniel-ellsberg-pentagon-
papers_n_2240016.html
Slide 32
Do you view Manning to be a whistleblower like Ellsberg? A.Yes
B.Maybe C.No 30