Minutes of the 53 State Level Expert Appraisal Committee

Chairman

1

Minutes of the 53rd

meeting of the

State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC)

held on 10th

to 13th

April, 2012 at 10:00 A.M.

The following members were present for the committee meeting.

Member Secretary SEAC, Environment Department welcomed the members of the

committee.

1. Dr. Sukumar Devotta

... Chairman 10th to 13th April, 2012

2. Er. G. K. Deshpande

… Member 10th to 13th April, 2012

3. Ar. Mukund S. Athavale

… Member 10th & 13th April, 2012

4. Dr. Prashant P. Bhave


5. Prof. Tarun Kant


6. Dr. Jay S. Samant

… Member 10th,12

th & 13th April,

2012

7. Er. Chandrakant I. Sambutwad


8. Er. Balbir Singh Sehgal


9. Shri A. R. Parshurame

… Member

Secretary

10th to 13th April, 2012

Chairman

2

Discussion Item 1

Subject: Pending praposals

SEAC noted that as on date, around 650 proposals are pending for appraisal. It was

decided to convene SEAC meeting twice in a month to clear this backlog. It is also noted that

some PPs’ concern about their inability to attend the meeting due to insufficient time they get for

preparation. Considering this it was decided to request Environment Department to display the

pending list on the website. Environment Department may verify the chronology from the

available documents and display the pending list in phase-wise manner (say the list of 200

proposals in two months). The agenda for SEAC meetings will also be prepared based on the

priority list and the completeness of the information provided by PP. The final list will be

displayed on the web after the approval of ED. ED will also request PPs to submit the required

information and copies of EIA reports. EIArReporst must be submitted to the SEAC members 10

days before the meeting. Proposals of PPs failing to submit the required information/EIA Reports

within the stipulated time to the Environment Department may be deferred to the next meeting.

Chairman

3

Discussion Item 2

Subject: TOR for the industrial projects

Many requests are being received from the PPs to issue a formal TOR by way of a letter.

It is therefore decided to circulate Model ToR for all sectors related to Category B to all SEAC

Members. Model ToRs will be fianalized accordingly in the next 10 days. Finalizaed Model

ToRs will be then uploaded on the website. All pending cases for ToR will be considered in next

few SEAC meetings. Additional project specific points, if any, may be prescribed in addition to

the corresponding Model ToR. ToR will be issued accordingly. This will save a lot of time of the

SEAC meeting and assist all in reducing the waiting time for TOR by PPs.

Chairman

4

Discussion Item 3

Subject: Minutes correction of the 44th

meeting of the SEAC for the item no. 18 and 19.

The Project proponent has submitted the letter dated 17th

February, 2012 for requesting

change in a 44th

SEAC minutes held on 13th

September, 2011 as details were wrongly

mentioned (typographical mistake as slight mix up of areas).

After verifying the documents following corrections in the 44th

SEAC minutes of the

meeting are approved:

For the Item No. 18 of the 44th

meeting of the SEAC

Point No. 1: “Name of the Project and location: Majra Limestone Mine (of area 11.898 hectares)

at village Wanjri, Tahsil Wani, District Yavatmal” mentioned in the 44th SEAC

minutes is replaced by “Majra Limestone Mine (of area 11.72 hectares) at village

Majra, Tahsil Wani, District Yavatmal.

Point No. 2: “Previous consideration/s: 34th SEAC mtg dt. 30

th September, 2010” mentioned in

the 44th SEAC minutes is replaced by 12

th SEAC mtg dt. 28th May, 2009.

For the Item No. 19 of the 44th

meeting of the SEAC

44th

SEAC minutes of the meeting

Point No. 1: “Name of the Project and location: Wanjri Limestone Mine (of area 8.863 hectares)

at village Wanjri, Tahsil Wani, District Yavatmal” mentioned in the 44th SEAC

minutes is replaced by “Majra Limestone and dolomite Mine (of area 18.83 hectares)

at village Majra, Tahsil Wani, District Yavatmal.

Point No. 2: “Previous consideration/s: 34th SEAC mtg dt. 30

th September, 2010” mentioned in

the 44th SEAC minutes is replaced by 12

th SEAC mtg dt. 28th May, 2009.

Point No. 3: “Brief details of the project (as per the proposal): “Lime stone mining” mentioned

in the 44th SEAC the minute is replaced by “Limestone and dolomite Mine”.

Chairman

5

Item No. 1

Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed Residential construction project –

“Marvel Arco” at Hadapsar, Tal Haveli, Dist: Pune by M/s. Marvel Sigma Homes

Pvt. Ltd.

(File No.: SEAC 2011/CR41/TC2) (New case)

The Project Proponent explained the proposal before the committee and committee noted

project details furnished by the Project Proponent as:

Name of the Project : Residential construction project “Marvel Arco”

Project Proponent : M/s M/s. Marvel Sigma Homes Pvt. Ltd

Consultant : M/s. Oasis Environmental Foundation

Category : 8(a)- B2

Location of the

project

: Sr.No. 176(parts) Hadapsar, Tal – Haveli, Dist: Pune.

Type of Project : Residential project

Plot Area : 25,400.00 m2

Proposed Total built

up area

: Total BUA : 42,582.00 m2

Ground coverage

area (%)

33.8 %

Estimated cost of the

project

: Rs.76 Cr

No. of Buildings : • Residential buildings: 6 Nos.

• Tenements: 228 Nos.

• Building configuration: 2 Basements + 1 Stilt + 12 floors

Height of building 37.50m

Water Requirement • Fresh Water: 128 m3/day

• Recycled water : 75 m3/day

Rain water

harvesting

No. of Recharge pits: 5 with 1.5 m x 2.5 m deep & 75 m deep bore

well.

Wastewater

generated

152 m3/day

Capacity of STP 160 m3/day, STP technology: FBBR (Fluidized Bed Bio Reactors)

Chairman

6

Solid Waste

Generation

• Biodegradable waste: 342 kg/day

• Non biodegradable waste: 210 kg/day

• STP Sludge (Dry sludge): 23 kg/day

Disposal • Use of Organic Waste Converter and disposal of compost in own

landscape.

• Dry STP sludge to be used as manure.

Energy • Energy requirement:3665 units/day, Source: MSEDCL

• DG set: 500 KVA x 3 No.

Energy

Conservation

• Use solar hot water system

Traffic Management • Parking area: 9764 Sq.m

• 4‐Wheeler : 252 Nos


• Bicycle: 501

• Width of internal rods: 6.0 – 9.0 m

Green Belt

Development

• Total R.G area: 3851 m2 (15%)

• RG area on the ground : 3711 m2

• RG area on the podium : 140 m2

• No. of trees to be planted: 340

Environment

Management Plan

• Capital cost: 1.16 Cr

• Operation and Maintenance cost: 11.74 Lakh.

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. The PP has

submitted the Pre-certification for Green Building from Indian Green Building Council.

It is noted that the project proponent initiated the construction work without obtaining the prior

environmental clearance. Environment Department may look into matter and take necessary

action. As the presentation was not comprehensive, only preliminary assessment was made.

The PP is directed to comply with the following observations:

1. Submit site photographs from different corners of the plot.

2. PP shall make adequate temporary residential arrangement for the labours (including those

from other neighbouring plots) presently residing on the plot.

3. Consent for water supply and drainage from competent authority shall be obtained.

Chairman

7

4. Charasteristics of treated waste water shall be submitted.

5. Provision of Solar PV shall be considered wherever appropriate.

6. The project proponent shall draw up a sustainable model with appropriate EMP, as the

proposed EMP (O&M) is inadequate.

7. Use of the terminology “Podium” shall be consistent and appropriately followed.

8. Layout showing fire tender movement shall be submitted.

9. Under ground tanks shall not be located below internal roads.

10. Submit the exact layout drawing of basement as it differs in Landscape Design Layout and

Service Layout.

11. Proper arrangements for ventilation to be ensured in basement.

12. Clear 6 m width with appropriate turning radius of shall be provided for the fire tender

movement without any obstruction. The plan depicting the same shall be submitted.

13. The existing trees ( 7 nos) on the plot are to be preserved and 385 new trees to be planted.

Shrubs (100 nos) of different species to be planted on the podium and similar area ( 92 m2).

14. Trees of species ‘Sice’ and ‘Terminalia’ shall be planted on the bank of nalla.

The comprehensive assessment will be done after submission of above compliance.

Chairman

8

Item No. 2

Subject: Environmental clearance for the “Marvel Kyra” Residential Construction Project

at Sr.No. 134 (parts) Hadapsar, Taluka: Haveli, Dist: Pune by M/s. Marvel Sigma

Homes Pvt. Ltd.

(File No.: SEAC 2011/CR 11/TC2) (New case)



Name of the Project : “Marvel Kyra” Residential Construction Project

Project Proponent : M/s M/s. Marvel Sigma Homes Pvt. Ltd.

Consultant : M/s. Oasis Environmental Foundation

Category : 8(a)B2

Previous

consideration/s

: Nil

Location of the

project

: Sr.No. 134 (parts) Hadapsar, Taluka: Haveli, Dist: Pune

Type of Project : Residential project

Plot Area : 24,600 m2


up area

: FSI : 30,400 m2

Non FSI : 27,872 m2

Total BUA : 58,223 m2

Ground coverage

area

7,090 m2 (29%)


project

: Rs. 75 Cr

No. of Buildings : • Residential buildings: 3 Nos.

• Commercial building: 1 No.

• Tenements: 115 Nos.

• Residential Building configuration: 2 Basement + 1 Stilt + 26

floors

• Commercial Building configuration: Ground + 2 floors

Height of building Residential: 99.93 m

Commercial:12 m

Water Requirement • Fresh Water: 80 KLD

• Flushing :- 35 KLD

• Gardening:- 44 KLD

Chairman

9

Rain water

harvesting

• Pit Size: 1.5 m x 2.5 m deep & 75 m deep bore well

• No of Recharge Pits: 06 Nos.

Wastewater

generated

89 KLD

Capacity of STP 90 KLD m3/day

Solid Waste

Generation




Disposal • Use of Organic Waste Converter and disposal of compost in own

landscape.

• Non biodegradable waste will be handed over to the authorized

recycler.


Energy • Energy requirement: 3233 units/day, Source: MSEDCL

• DG set: 500 KVA x 4 No.

Traffic Management • Parking area: 13991 m2

• 4‐Wheeler : 393 Nos.


• Bicycle: 278 Nos.

• Width of internal rods: 9.0 m

Green Belt

Development

• Total R.G area : 6170.00 m2

• RG area on the ground : 6170.00 m2

• Landscape area : 6170 m2

• Shrubbery area : 290.27 m2

• Ground cover : 2786.14 m2

• Proposed Plantation : 451 Trees

Sr Botanical Name Common Name No.

1. Alstonia scholaris Saptaparni 52

2. Anthocephallus cadamba Kadamb 01

3. Bauhinia blackeana Kanchan 13

4. Bauhinia purpurea Rakta kanchan 37

5. Caryota urens Fishtail palm 02

6. Cassia Fistula Bahava tree 36

Chairman

10

7. Callistemon Bottle brush 14

8. Cordia sebestina Cordia 24

9. Lagestromia racemosa - 24

10. Michelia champaca Champaca 06

11. Millingtonia hortensis Indian cork tree 03

12. Mimusops elengi Bakul tree 05

13. Nyctanthes arbortristis Parijatak 03

14. Peltophorum Copper pod 76

15. Plumeria alba Frangipani white 18

16. Plumeria rubra 12

17. Pongamia pinnata Karanj 17

18. Saraca asoka Sita ashok 48

19. Spathodea campanulata African tulip tree 59

20. Terminrlia catappa Badam 01

Total 451

Landscape area (sq. m.) 6170

Environment

Management Plan

• Capital cost: 97 Lacs • Operation and Maintenance cost: 9.55 Lac/year

Decision:



The PP is directed to comply with the following observations :


2. As per the guidelines issued by MoEF for High Rise Buildings vide O.M. no. 21-270/2008-

IA.III dated 7th February, 2012, for buildings with height greater than 60 m the minimum

width of the road (right of way) is 30 and the nearest fire station should be located within

Chairman

11

distance of 2 km. The DP map submitted by the PP for the area shows the width of the road

to as 24 m and the height of the residential building proposed is more than 60 m. Therefore,

the PP shall recast the project proposal complying with the MoEF guidelines for High Rise

Building.

3. Consent for water supply and drainage from competent authority shall be obtained.

4. Submit a note on energy conservation measures in accordance with ECBC guidelines.

5. Submit details of STP and its location.

6. Out of 90 nos. of existing trees, 77 are to be retained, 13 are to be transplanted and 530 new

trees are to be planted. Shrubs (50 nos.) to be planted.

7. Submit a note on the existing trees, trees to be cut, trees to be transplanted and trees to be

planted (nos., size, age, and species) as per MoEF guidelines. In the list of trees, inclusion of

bushes to be removed and one species viz. India Cork Tree to be included.

As the project needs total recast pursuant to compliance of guidelines issued by MoEF for High

Rise Buildings, comprehensive assessment will be done after submission of above compliance.

Chairman

12

Item No. 3

Subject: TOR for the proposed industrial project at Village Savarsai, Pen Khopoli Road,

Tal. Pen, Dist. Raigad by M/s Echjay Industries Pvt. Ltd.

(File No.: SEAC 2011/CR-2401/TC-2) (TOR case)

The PP was absent.

Chairman

13

Item No. 4

Subject: TOR for the proposed expansion of industrial project at D-101, MIDC Malegaon,

Sinnar, Dist. Nashik by M/s Bhagwati Steel Cast Ltd.


The Project Proponent explained the proposal before the committee and committee noted project

details furnished by the Project Proponent as:

Name of the Project : M/s Bhagwati Steel Cast Ltd

Category : 3(a) – B1 [Metallurgical Industries]

Project Proponent : M/s Bhagwati Steel Cast Ltd

Consultant : M/s. Pollution and Ecology Control Services, Nagpur

Location of the project : D-101, MIDC Malegaon, Sinnar, Dist. Nashik

Type of Project : Metallurgical Industry

Previous consideration/s : Nil

Total Plot Area : Total Plot area: 16421 m2

Built up area: 5029 m2

Project cost : Existing : 14.22 Crores

Expansion : Rs. 1.5 Crores only in plant & machinery

Products : Product Existing Expansion Total

M.S. Ingots 2700 MT/M 3550 MT/M 6250 MT/M

CTD Bars & Rods 3500 MT/M 2500 MT/M 6000 MT/M Raw materials : List of raw

materials to

be used

Quantity

(tonnes/month) full

production capacity

Source of

materials

M S Scrap

3105 MT/Month (Existing)

4085 MT/Mont ( Expansion)

Domestic &

Imported

MS Ingots 3675 MT/Month (Existing)

2675 MT/Mont( Expansion)

Captive

consumption +

Domestic

procurement

Manufacturing process Manufacturing of M.S. Ingots:

Manufacturing of M. S. Ingots involves a process of melting M. S.

Scrap in a coreless medium frequency induction furnace and

converting it to liquid steel and subsequently to ingots. Specially

Chairman

14

required M. S. Scraps are procured from the market and tested for

their basic contents and grades. The approved and selected lots of the

said scraps are then fed into the induction furnace at medium

frequency and heated. The heat in the furnace heats up the scrap and

when the intensity of the heat reaches the melting point of steel, the

scraps start melting in the furnace crucible. When the total scrap as

per the capacity of the crucible is molten, the sample is taken from

liquid steel and tested for the composition of steel and the carbon

contents. Therefore some additives of ferro-alloys like Silico-

managanese, silicon, aluminum shots and boric acid are added to the

liquid steel to maintain the composition and quality. After

confirmation of the carbon content the liquid steelis poured into the

specially designed heated moulds for it to be given the desired shape

and size. After they are molded into the desired shapes, the strippings

are removed and they are finally given the dressing i.e. cleaning and

removal of unwanted particles finishing cleaning etc.The said

hot/cold ingots are removed to the storage site or trucks with the help

of hot and cold magnetic cranes for further dispatch. Thereafter they

are assembled and bundled and sent for onward dispatch.

Manufacturing Process details for Rolling Mill:

Qualitative raw materials MS Ingots & Billets is being tested and

push in re-heated furnace. The heated ingot & billet piece comes to

roughing mill 1st stand. There are 7 nos. passes in 1st stand then goes

to 2nd stand, 3rd stand from roughing mill. It goes to inter mill via

passing, rotary shearing and pinch roll. There are 6 stands in inter

mill where it got the finish size. From the inter mill, it goes to pinch

roll , then it passes through flying shearing where it is being cut for

required length. The small pieces cut from the cooling bed lying

rolled product and being tested for size,% Elongation, Bend & Re

bend and weight per meter. After visual inspection the bar being

bundled and keep in lot for dispatch.

Water Requirement : Total water required: 140. 5 m3/day; Source: MIDC

Quantity of recycled water: 110 m3/day (cooling water) Solid waste • Metal Slag & Fine Dust: 40 MT/M ( Existing) and 90 MT/M

(Expansion)

• Mill Scale ( from Rolling Mill): 100 MT/M ( Existing) and

80 MT/M (Expansion)

• Sludge from APC: 5 MT/M (Existing) and 5 MT/M (Expansion)

Solid waste is land filled at present within premises. It is proposed

to install slag crusher for metal fines recovery. Further the ground

slag can be used as building material and additive in cement mill.

Effluent Generation : Domestic effluent : 20 CMD

Air Pollution Control : Wet Scrubber with common stack of height 25 m

Chairman

15

Green Belt Development : 4000 m2, Proposed nos. of trees: 100 Nos.

Fuel Daily Consumption (TPD/KLD)_ Sr

Fuel

Existing Proposed

1 Furnace Oil

(used as stand by fuel

in rolling mill)

5000 Lit Per

Day

Nil

2 Coal 15 T 10 T

3 Electricity 6.3 MW Nil Energy Requirement : 6.3 MW (MSEDCL)

Environmental

Management Plan

: Capital cost: Rs.77,00,000/- O&M cost: Rs. 7,50,000/-

Decision:

The PP informed that they are proposing one more project at G-7, MIDC Malegaon, Tahsil

Sinnar, Dist. Nashik located at 2 km distance from the above proposed one(i.e. D-101, MIDC

Malegaon) and of same nature. The PP requested to consider both these project for issuance of

ToR. SEAC agreed for the same. The details of the other proposed project are as below:

Name of the Project : M/s Bhagwati Steel Cast Ltd

Category : 3(a) – B1 [Metallurgical Industries]

Project Proponent : M/s Bhagwati Steel Cast Ltd

Consultant : M/s. Pollution and Ecology Control Services, Nagpur

Location of the project : G-7, MIDC Malegaon, Tahsil Sinnar, Dist. Nashik

Type of Project : Metallurgical Industry

Total Plot Area : 88,000 m2

Products : M S Billets – 25000 TPM

Raw materials : M S Scrap 28000 TPM

Ferro Manganese 200 TPM

Ferro Silicon 50 TPM

Both the proposals were discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. The

PP has been advised to carry out the independent EIA studies for both the sites considering the

various comments made by the committee and the model TOR prescribed (Page No 127) and

then approach the committee for the appraisal. A QCI accredited consultant and MOEF/NABL

accredited lab shall be used for the preparation of EIA Report.

Chairman

16

Item No. 5

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Establishment of 12 MLD CETP at

R.S. No. 610 A, Ichalkaranji Tal: Hatkanangale, Dist: Kolhapur by M/s.

Ichalkaranji Textile Development Cluster Ltd., Ichalkaranji




Name of the Project : 12 MLD CETP for Small & Medium Scale Textile Process

Industries

Category : 7(h) – B 1

Project Proponent : Mr. G. R. Akiwate.Managing Director, Ichalkaranji Textile

Development Cluster Ltd.,

Location of the project : R.S. No. 610 A, Ichalkaranji Tal: Hatkanangale, Dist: Kolhapur

74.28 E, 16.41 N, MSL = 548 m

Type of Project : Common Effluent Treatment Plant

Total Plot Area : 10568 m2 (BUA = 2165 m

2)

Project cost : 22.75 Cr

Products : This project is for construction of CETP

Raw materials :

During Construction : Aggregate – 6000 MT, Cement – 3250 MT, Steel – 425 MT, Sand – 11200

MT, Excavation – 7000 Cum

During Operation :

Sr Name Number

of

Storage’s

Capacity

( TPD )

Physical

and Chemical

Composition

Consumption

( in TPD )

Maximum

Quantity of

storage at any

point of time

1

2

3

4

Hydrated Lime

Ferrous Sulfate

Sodium

Hypochlorite

Polyelectrolyte

One

One

One

One

25 M.T

25 M.T.

6 M.T.

1 M.T.

Calcium

Iron

Sodium

Acryl amide

3 TPD

3 TPD

0.2 TPD

24 KG/Day

20 M.T.

20 M.T.

6 M.T.

1 M.T.

Water Requirement : Construction Phase- 50 m

3/day – Bore well water.

Operational phase for domestic purpose- 10 m3/day from

Chairman

17

Ichalkaranji Municipal supply.

Effluent Generation : Domestic waste 7 m3/day shall be combined with industrial

effluent and send to CETP.

12000 m3/day disposed off into ‘Kala Nala’

ETP / STP capacity : 12 MLD CETP

Solid waste management : ETP Sludge = 350 TPM (Primary Sludge) & 87 TPM (Secondary

Sludge) - Sludge will be sent to CHWTSDF

Area in Sq.mtr : 3000 m2 Green Belt Development :

Existing nos. of trees ,

Proposed nos. of trees with

plant species

Existing No of trees- Nil

Proposed No of trees- 500

Energy Requirement : 1 MW, DG set – 1000 KVA

Environmental

Management Plan

: Sr. Item Recurring Cost

(Lakh / Y)

Capital Cost

(Lakh)

1 Air Pollution

Control

1 5

2 Water Pollution

Control

620 2200

3 Noise Pollution

Control

- 19

4 Environment

Monitoring and

Management

25 15

5 Reclaimation borrow

/mined area

- -

6 Occupational Health 1 1

7 Green Belt 0.5 1

8 Solid waste

management

175 34

9 Others -

Total (Lakh) 822.5 2275

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. It was noted that

the project is implemented pursuant to issuance of Consent to Establish by MPCB, however for

some reason prior Environmental Clearance was not obtained. ED may look intot he matter and

take appropriate action.


Chairman

18

1. Submit the history of the project with explanatory notes and documentary evidences.

2. Justification for implemenating the project without obtaining prior Environmental

Clearance.

Considering the status of project, the Committee agreed to issue ToR in the interest of

environment. The project proponent has been advised to carry out EIA study considering the

model TOR prescribed (Page No111 ) and following additional aspects:

1. In view of the textile waste water, TDS removal shall be considered.

2. Arrangement for handling, temparory storage, transportation and disposal of large

quantity of sludge generated.

3. The PP shall draw up a sustainable model with appropriate EMP.

4. Recycle of treated waste water in the interest of water conservation.

5. Public consultation as per MoEF guidelines.

After completion the of EIA studies and Public Consultation PP may approach the committee for

the appraisal. A QCI accredited consultant and MOEF/NABL accredited lab shall be used for the

preparation of EIA Report.

Chairman

19

Item No. 6

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Establishment of 1 MLD CETP at Plot

No 7-11 Phase I Sector – B, Shri Laxmi Co-op. Industrial Estate Ltd., Tal:

Hatkanangle, Dist: Kolhapur by M/s. Ichalkaranji Textile Development Cluster

Ltd., Ichalkaranji




Name of the Project : 1 MLD CETP for Small & Medium Scale Textile Process

Industries

Category : 7(h) – B1

Project Proponent : Mr. G. R. Akiwate. Managing Director, Ichalkaranji Textile

Development Cluster Ltd., Ichalkaranji,

Location of the project : Plot No. 7,8,9,10,11, Phase I Sector – B,

Shri Laxmi Co-op. Industrial Estate Ltd., Tal: Hatkanangle.

16 0 44’N and 74

0 25’ E

Type of Project : Common Effluent Treatment Plant

Total Plot Area : 3514 m2 ( BUA = 540 m

2)


Products : This project is for construction of CETP

Raw materials :

During Construction : Aggregate – 1000 MT, Cement – 530 MT, Steel – 70 MT, Sand – 1000 MT,

Excavation – 5000 Cum

During Operation :

Sr Name Number

of

Storage’s

Capacity

( TPD )

Physical

and Chemical

Composition

Consumption

( in TPD )

Maximum

Quantity of

storage at any

point of time

1

2

3

4

Hydrated Lime

Ferrous Sulfate

Sodium

Hypochlorite

Polyelectrolyte

One

One

One

One

10 M.T

10 M.T.

0.5 M.T.

60 KG

Calcium

Iron

Sodium

Acryl amide

0.3 TPD

0.3 TPD

16 KG/Day

2 KG/Day

10 M.T.

10 M.T.

0.5 M.T.

60 KG

Water Requirement : 5 CMD

Chairman

20

Effluent Generation : Domestic waste 3.5 m3/day shall be combined with industrial

effluent and send to CETP.

ETP / STP capacity : 1 MLD CETP

Solid waste management : ETP Sludge = 19 TPM (Primary Sludge) & 7 TPM (Secondary

Sludge) - Sludge will be sent to CHWTSDF

Area in Sq.mtr : 1000 m2 Green Belt Development :

Existing nos. of trees ,

Proposed nos. of trees with

plant species

Existing No of trees- Nil

Proposed No of trees- 150

Energy Requirement : 0.2 MW, DG set – 200 KVA

Environmental

Management Plan

: Sr. Item Recurring Cost

(Lakh/Y)

Capital Cost

(Lakh)

1 Air Pollution

Control

0.5 5

2 Water Pollution

Control

40 253

3 Noise Pollution

Control

- 7

4 Environment

Monitoring and

Management

15 7

5 Reclaimation borrow

/mined area

- -

6 Occupational Health 0.5 0.5

7 Green Belt 0.15 0.50

8 Solid waste

management

18 15

9 Others -

Total 74.15 288

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. It was noted that

the project is implemented pursuant to issuance of Consent to Establish by MPCB, however for

some reasons prior Environmental Clearance was not obtained. ED may look intot he matter and

take appropriate action.


Chairman

21

1. Submit the history of the project with explanatory notes and documentary evidences.

2. Justification for implemenating the project without obtaining prior Environmental

Clearance.

Considering the status of project, the Committee agreed to issue ToR in the interest of

environment. The project proponent has been advised to carry out the EIA study considering the

model TOR prescribed (Page No111 ) and following additional aspects:

1. In view of the textile wastewater, TDS removal shall be considered.

2. Arrangement for handling, temparory storage, transportation and disposal of large

quantity of sludge generated.

3. Recycle of treated waste water in the interest of water conservation.

4. The PP shall draw up a sustainable model with appropriate EMP.

After completion of EIA studies PP may approach the committee for the appraisal. A QCI

accredited consultant and MOEF/NABL accredited lab shall be used for the preparation of EIA

Report. Public consultation has been dispensed with as the plant is located in an industrial estate.

Chairman

22

Item No. 7

Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed SRA Project Balaji CHS (Prop) at

C.S.No. 167(Pt), 168, 169(Pt), 170(Pt), 171(Pt), 155(Pt), 658(Pt) of Parel Sewree

Division at G.D. Ambekar Marg, Jerbai Wadia Road, Mumbai-14 by M/s.

Renuka Realtors

(File No.: SEAC 2011/CR560/TC2) (Compliance case)



Name of the Project : “Proposed Slum Rehabilitation Project”.

Project Proponent : M/s.Renuka Realtors

Consultant and

Accreditation

M/s. Ultra-Tech Environmental Consultancy & Laboratory

Category 8(a) B2

Location of the

project

: C. S. No. 167(Pt.), 168, 169 (Pt.), 170(Pt.), 171(Pt.), 155 (Pt.),

658(pt), 714 (Pt.), 715, 716, 717 (Pt.), 718 (Pt.), 719 (Pt.), 720

(Pt.), 989 (Pt.), of Parel Sewri Division, at G.D. Ambedkar

Marg, Jerabhai Wadia Road, Mumbai- 400 014.

Previous

consideration/s

47th meeting of SEAC held on 19.11.2011

49th meeting of SEAC held on 21.01.2012

Type of Project : Slum Rehabilitation Scheme.

Plot Area : Total plot area: 5863.62 Sq. mt.

Deduction: 372.54 Sq.m

Net plot Area: 5491.08 Sq.m


up area

: • FSI: 16420.47 Sq. mt. ( FSI :3.00)

• Non FSI: 25,048.81 sq. m.

• Total built up area: 41,469.28 sq. m.

Ground coverage

area

52 %


project

: Rs. 186.40 Crores.

No. of Buildings and

its configuration

: Rehabilitation Building:

• One building of Ground + 13 Upper Floors.

• Flats: 277 nos.

• Shops: 13 nos.

• Balwadi: 4 nos.

Chairman

23

• Welfare Center: 4 nos.

• Society office: 4 nos.

Sale Building:

• One building of Part Basement(for services) + Ground+ 4

Parking Floors +5th floor for amenities+40 upper floors

• Flats: 99 nos.

• Shops: 15 nos.

Maximum Height of

building

• For Rehabilitation Building – 40.90 Mt.

• For Sale Building – 171.3 Mt

Total Water

Requirement

For Non Monsoon season:

Fresh Water:177m3/day[From M.C.G.M:174+From Tanker:3]

Recycled water: 92m3/day

Total water: 269 m3/day

For Monsoon season:

Fresh Water:177m3/day[From M.C.G.M:174+From Tanker:3]

Recycled water: 88m3/day

Total water: 265 m3/day

Sewage Generation • Rehabilitation:167 m3/day

• Sale:60 m3/day

STP capacity • Rehabilitation:185 m3

• Sale:70 m3

Storm water

drainage

• Quantity of storm water: 0.12m3/Sec

• Size of SWD:1 internal discharge point of 450 mm dia at

slope 1 250

Rain water

Harvesting

• 2 rain water harvesting tank of capacities 50 m3 for

rehabilitation building and 35 m3 for sale building.

• 4 no. of recharge pits.

Solid waste

management

• Dry waste: 275 Kg/day

• Wet waste : 613 Kg/day

• STP Sludge: 34 Kg/day

Disposal • There is provision for segregation and collection of bio-

degradable waste and recyclable waste within the premises.

• Wet garbage will be treated in an Organic Waste Converter

(OWC) and the dry garbage will be handed over to MCGM.

• Dried sludge from STP will be used as manure within the

premises for landscape development.

Green Belt

Development and

number of trees to

be planted

• R. G. Area: 779.13 m2

• Numbers and name of species of trees to be planted on ground

49 Nos.

• Number of shrubs to be planted: 28 nos.

Energy Requirement • Maximum demand: Rehabilitation:1117 KW, Sale:1585 KW

• D.G. Set: 1 D.G. set of 320 kVA (for rehabilitation building)

Chairman

24

& 1 D.G. set of 630 kVA (for sale building).

Traffic Management • Number of parking provided: 240 Nos

• Parking area: 6076.07 m2

Energy

Conservation

measures

• All lifts and pumps are proposed on VFD drives which

results in 30% saving in consumption.

• Provision of high energy efficient lamps (CFL).

• Use of solar energy for external lighting.

• Switch on and timer based lighting to be proposed on 30%

stages operation.

• Use of photo sensors.

Environmental

Management Plan

Construction phase: Capital cost:96 lakhs

Operation phase:

• Capital cost: 129.16 lakhs

• & M cost: 112.1 lakhs

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent.

It was noted that PP has already demolished existing structures without obtaining the prior

environmental clearance. Environment Department may look into the matter and take appropriate

action.

The water supply for the Sale building portion is likely to be available only after Completion of

‘Middle Vaitarana Project’.

It was further noted that the height of the proposed Sale building is 171 m and the width of the

access road is less than 30 m. This contravenes the guidelines issued by MoEF for High Rise

Buildings vide O.M. no. 21-270/2008- IA.III dated 7th February, 2012.

The PP has obtained the consent for water supply for a quantum of 45 LPCD for rehab, which is

much less than the recommended requirement of water, however, the PP has agreed to procure

the additional required water through tankers till the water supply is available from MCGM.

Considering above points, recommendation for prior Environmental Clearance for the project as

a whole is not possible. Therefore, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the prior

Environmental Clearance only for Rehabilitation Portion.

Chairman

25

If the above is acceptable, the PP shall provide independent OWC with adequate area, increase

RWH to reduce the freshwater requirement and revise EMP with adequate corpus for the Rehab

portion.

Chairman

26

Item No. 8

Subject: Environmental clearance for construction project - “PREMIA” at Village -Nerhe,

Dist.-Pune by M/s. CD Developers

(File No.: SEAC 2010/CR 731/TC2) (Compliance case)



Name of the Project : Construction project - “PREMIA”

Project Proponent : M/s. CD Developers

Consultant : M/s. Ultra-Tech

Category : 8(a)- B2

Previous

consideration/s

: 50th meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC)

held on 8th to 11th February, 2012

Location of the

project

: S.No. 35/2,35/3,35/4,35/5,35/6 ,34/3,34/2(P), Village Nerhe, Dist.-

Pune, State – Maharashtra

Type of Project : Construction Project

Plot Area : • Total Plot Area : 26654.68 m2

• Net Plot Area : 22115.03 m2


up area

: • FSI : 24052.91 m2

• Non FSI : 18783.47 m2

• Total : 42836.38 m2

Ground coverage

area (%)

24.41 %


project

: Rs. 65.30 Crores

No. of Buildings : Residential:

• Bldgs A,B1,B2 = P+ 11 floors with 159 no of tenements

• C1,C2,D1,D2 =B+ P+ 11 floors with 212 no of tenements

• E and F types of row houses having 19 nos.

• Total No of Flats – 391Nos.

Commercial:

• 1 bldg having B+G+3 with 2nos of shops and 8 nos of offices.

Height of building 31.35 m

Chairman

27

Water Requirement Total Water Requirement = 317 CMD

Dry season:

• Narhe Grampanachayat for the domestic water: 182 CMD

• Tanker water: 8 CMD

• Recycled water: 127 CMD

Wet season:

• Narhe Grampanachayat for the domestic water: 112 CMD

• Tanker water: 8 CMD

• Recycled water: 96 CMD

Rain water

harvesting

• 2 nos. of RWH tanks having capacity 95 m3 of each

• 12 Nos. of RWH pits of 12.4 m x 5 m x 2.5 m

Wastewater

generated

241 m3 /day

Capacity of STP 255 m3

STP technology: Suspended Media Bio Reactor (SMBR)

Solid Waste

Generation




Disposal • Dry garbage will be segregated & disposed off to recyclers.

• Wet garbage will be composted using organic converter

technology and used as organic manure for landscaping.


Energy • Source of power & supply capacity: 2120.7 kW

• DG set: 82.5 kVA and 100 kVA

Energy

Conservation

• CFL based lighting will be done in the common areas, landscape

areas, signage’s, Entry gates and boundary compound walls etc.

• Solar Street Lights will be provided for Internal Road.

• Timer Switch for Streetlight, Garden light, building staircase &

common passages of bldg. to be provided.

• Water Level Controller with Timer for water pumps system to be

provided.

Traffic Management • 4 W: 214 nos.

• 2 W: 433 nos.

• Bicycles: 494 nos.

Green Belt

Development

• Total R.G area: 5896.00 m2

• Trees to be plated inside the plot: 551Nos.

Chairman

28

• Existing trees details:

Botanical

Name

Common

name

Existi

ng

trees

(Nos)

Cutting

Trees

(Nos.)

Height

of tree

(mt)

Girt

h of

tree

(cm)

Age

(Year)

Mangifera

indica

Mango 2 0 4 60 5

Azadirachta

indica

limb 3 1 12 to

15

120 15

Syzygium

cumini

jambhul 3 2 15 90 10

Other Other 3 3 Environment

Management Plan

Construction phase: 9.5 lakhs

Operation phase:

• Capital Cost: 160.12 lakhs

• O&M Cost: 30.4 lakhs / annum

Decision:


SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for Environmental Clearance only after complying

with following condition:

1. Rain water harvesting shall be maximized to minimize the fresh water requirement by

providing appropriate measures, including water storage facility.

Chairman

29

Item No. 9

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed “ARIHANT AKANKSHA” a

Residential cum Commercial project with Rental Housing Scheme of MMRDA

located at Survey no. 7/5, 14/6, 14/7, 15/1, 15/2(1), 15/2(2), 15/2(3), 15/2(4),

15/2(5), 15/2(6), 15/3, 15/4, 16, 18/1A, 18/1B, 23/3, 23/4, 24/1A, 149/1, 149/2,

149/3, 149/4, 149/5, 150/1, 150/2, 150/3, 150/4, 150/5, 150/6, 150/7 at village

Palaspe, Tal – Panvel, Dist- Raigad,developed by M/s. Arihant Abode Ltd.


The Project Proponent explained the proposal before the committee and committee

noted project details furnished by the Project Proponent as:

Name of the Project : “ARIHANT AKANKSHA” a Residential Project under Rental

Housing Scheme of MMRDA.

Project Proponent : M/s. Arihant Abode Ltd

Consultant : M/s. Enviro Analysts & Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Category : 8(b)- B1

Previous

consideration/s

: 41st meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC)

held on 16th March 2011

Location of the

project

: Plot Bearing S. No 7/5,14/6,14/7,15/1,15/2(1),15/2(2),15/2(3),

15/2(4),15/2(5),15/2(6,15/3,16,18/1A,18/1B,23/3,23/4, 24/1A, 149/1,

149/2, 149/3, 149/4, 149/5, 150/1, 150/2, 150/3, 150/4, 150/5, 150/6,

150/7 at village Palaspe, Tal – Panvel, Dist- Raigad

Type of Project : Construction Project

Plot Area : 66,751.620 sq.m.


up area

: Construction Area: 5,07,283.83 sq.m.

FSI Area: 2,48,560.45 sq.m.

Non FSI area: 2,58,723.38 sq.m.

Ground coverage 42.39 %


project

: Rs.316 Cr

No. of Buildings : Total Buildings: 25nos

Sale Section:

Buildings: 22nos Residential buildings + 1no of School,

Type A, A1, B, B1 : B + ST +2P + 35 Floors,

Type C: ST + 35 Floors,

School: G + 7 Floors

MMRDA Section:

Building: 2no,

Chairman

30

Type A & B: G + 28 Floors

Height of building Sale max height:113.20m

MMRDA max height:87.55m

Water Requirement • Total Water Requirement: 4.525 MLD

• Fresh Water: 2.978 MLD

• Recycled water : 1.655 MLD

Rain water

harvesting

• 4nos of rain water harvesting tanks of total capacity 1000m3

capacity

• 103 nos. of recharge pits with Size: 3m x 3m x 3m

Wastewater

generated

3.591 MLD

Capacity of STP • 4nos of STP of total 3.6 MLD capacity (for Sale:1.840MLD &

MMRDA:1.760MLD)

• STP technology: SAFF Technology

Solid Waste

Generation

• Biodegradable waste: 9.92 MT/day

• Non biodegradable waste: 6.68 MT/day

• STP Sludge (Dry sludge): 0.26 MT/day

Disposal • Organic waste generated will be composted using OWC.

• Non Biodegradable waste will be handed over to authorized

recycler.


Energy For Sale: 15nos of 990KVA,

MMRDA:7nos of 990KVA ,

Source: MSEB

Energy

Conservation

Solar energy harvesting for Common Area Lighting Sytem.

Traffic Management • Parking area: 70, 921.34 sq.m.

• 2‐Wheelar: 295 Nos.

• 4‐Wheeler: 1,847 Nos.

• Width of internal rods : 9m & 11m, Ramps: 7.0 wide, Driveways:

9.0 m wide

Green Belt

Development

• Total R.G area: 6821.48 Sq. m (8%)

• RG on Ground: 5,304 m2

• RG on podium: 1,517.41 m2

Environment

Management Plan

Operation phase:

• Capital Cost: 13.0 lakhs

• O&M Cost: 185 lakhs / annum

Chairman

31

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. Following points

were observed during the presentation:

1. As per the guidelines issued by MoEF for High Rise Buildings vide O.M. no. 21-

270/2008- IA.III dated 7th February, 2012, for any building with height greater than 60

m, the nearest fire station should be located within a distance of 2 km. The PP informed

that they have agreement with another private agency having their own fire station.

However, the PP has not submitted any such agreement.

2. The PP stated that for the provision of water supply, drainage facility, waste disposal and

other amenities / infrastructure, MMRDA is responsible. However the PP has failed to

submit such a letter of commitment from MMRDA.

3. PP has not addressed the issue of reduction in the tenement density to the maximum

desirable figure less than 1000/ha. The consequences of such a high tenement density

have been articukated in the earlier MOMs.

In view of above, SEAC decided to recommend the project for rejection.

Chairman

32

Item No. 10

Subject: Environmental clearance for proposed the Expansion Residential project “Oval

Nest” at Warje, Pune by M/s. Shri Sai Associates.

(File No.:SEAC2010/CR 684/ TC2) (Compliance case)



Name of the Project : Expansion Residential project “Oval Nest”

Project Proponent : M/s. Shri Sai Associates

Consultant Aditya Environmental Services Pvt. Ltd

Location of the

project

: S. No. 77/2/1+2+3+4+5+77/1(P) & S. No. 78/1B/1 at Warje, Pune.

Type of Project : Construction project (Expansion)

Previous

consideration/s

48th meeting of the SEAC held on 27th to 30

th December, 2011 and

50th meeting of the SEAC held on 8

th to 11

th February,2012

Plot Area : Total plot area: 33,802.70 m2


up area

: • FSI Area: 26,372.76 m

2

• Non FSI Area: 19,814.34 m

2

• Total Built up Area: 46,187.1 m

2

Ground Coverage

Area

: 38.92 %


project

: Rs. 96.22 Crores

No. of Buildings : Existing:

• 6 Buildings ( Basement +Stilt parking + 11 floors with 258 units)

• 1 Club house (G+1)

• One commercial building (G + 1)

Proposed:

• 1 Residential Building (Stilt parking +32 )

Maximum Height of

building

Existing : 36 m

Proposed: 97m (Upto terrace level)

Total Water

Requirement

• Fresh water:130 KLD, from PMC,

• Recycled water: 132.22 KLD

• Total water requirement: 262.22 KLD

Chairman

33

Sewage Generation 156.42 KLD

STP capacity Existing capacity – 150 KLD; Proposed capacity – 15 KLD

STP Technology Existing – Sludge Return Bio Reactor (SRBR);

Proposed – Suspended Media Bio Reactor (SMBR)

Rain water

Harvesting

• No. of recharge pits : 3 Nos. with 5.0 m X 3.0 m X 1.5 m size

• the surface storm water runoff flows to an existing nala adjoining

the access road to the site.

Solid waste

Generation

• Dry quantity (kg/day): 179.40 kg/day

(Existing – 163.20 kg/day; Proposed – 16.20 kg/day)

• Wet Quantity (kg /day): 256.70 kg/day


• STP Sludge (Dry Sludge) : 61.00 kg/day


Solid waste

Management

• The wet waste shall be treated in Vermi-composting pits; Dry

waste shall be segregated and led to recyclers or scrap dealers.

• STP sludge will be used as manure.

Green Belt

Development

• RG on ground (sqm) 9795 sqm; 41.19% of gross plot area

• RG on podium (sqm) 3958 sqm; 16.64% of gross plot area

• Trees to be planted on ground: 327 nos.

• Trees on podium: 48 nos.

Energy Requirement • Source: MSEDCL

• Existing – 1478 KW; Proposed – 165 KW

• D.G. Set: 2 Nos. of D.G. Set of 125 kVA each

Traffic Management • 2 –Wheeler: Existing – 688 nos. ; Proposed – 81 nos.

• 4-Wheeler: Existing – 348 nos. ; Proposed – 54 nos.

• Width of all Internal Roads – 6.00 meters

Energy

Conservation

measures

• Use of Energy Efficient Luminaries – LED lights, CFL lamps, T5

tube fixtures with electronic ballast;

• Energy efficient lifts with group control;

• BEE star rated Air Conditioners (Club House & Residential

Units)

• Solar Water Heating system;

• Sleep mode code for air conditioners in bedrooms;

• Use of wind – solar hybrid system for energy generation for

common area lighting in lobbies and staircases at each floor in

each building.

• Energy efficient pumps and motors

Environmental

Management Plan

• Capital cost: 1,97,41,000/-

• Operation and maintenance cost: 11,36,000/-

Chairman

34

Decision:


SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for Environmental Clearance subject to complying

with the following conditions:

1. Internal roads for fire engine movement are not adequate, particularly within the

existing complex. This has to be rectified by providing appropriate access for fire

engines.

2. Documentary proof of complying with the the guidelines issued by MoEF for

High Rise Buildings vide O.M. no. 21-270/2008- IA.III dated 7th February,

2012,with respect to the width of the road and fire station location in the vicinity

shall be submitted.

3. Tree to be planted: 979 trees on RG on ground, 395 small trees and shrubs on RG

on podium, and suitable plants on garden area. Attempts to be made plant trees

like mulberry, bomsax etc. to attract birds. The biodiversity park area on the

slopes of the hill shall have trails and tree groves.

Chairman

35

Item No. 11

Subject: Environmental clearance for proposed the proposed SRA Scheme on plot bearing

CTS No. 128-A/4(pt) of Village Kandivali at Renuka Nagar, New Link Road,

Dahanukarwadi, Kandivali (W), Mumbai by M/s. Bau Developers Pvt. Ltd.

(File No.: SEAC2011/CR952/TC2)

Project proponent was absent.

Item No. 12

Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed Slum Rehabilitation Project at Byculla

Division, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Marg, Kanjarwada Situated at B. J. Marg, and

K. K. Marg, Byculla (W), Mumbai by M/s. Krish Developers



Chairman

36

Item No. 13

Subject: Environmental clearance for the “IT/ITES, BFSI and Commercial with public

parking” at C.S.no.166 of Lower Parel division situated at N.M Joshi Marg, Lower

Parel, Mumbai by M/s. Marathon realty Pvt Ltd.

(File No.: SEAC 3511/CR 963/TC2) (New case)



Name of the Project : “IT/ITES, BFSI and Commercial with public parking”

Project Proponent : M/s. Marathon Realty Pvt Ltd

Consultant : M/s. Ultra-Tech Environmental Consultancy & Laboratory

Category : 8(b)- B1

Previous

consideration/s

: New case

Location of the

project

: C.S.no.166 of Lower Parel division situated at N.M Joshi Marg,

Lower Parel, Mumbai

Type of Project : Expansion Project (Construction project)

Plot Area : Total Plot Area: 27163.38 m2, Deductions : 1069.84 m

2

Net Plot Area : 26093.54 m2


up area

: Existing Expansion Total

FSI (m2) 13298.18 81705.87 95004.05

Non FSI (m2) 5401.16 94294.75 99695.91

Total BUA (m2) 18699.34 176000.62 194699.96

Ground Coverage 46.5 %


project

: Rs. 151.67 Cr

No. of Buildings : Existing: Building A & B: B + Gr + 3 Upper flrs.

Proposed: Building C: 3 B + Gr to 7 flrs parking + 8th to 39

th upper

floors

Height of building Building A : 17.20 m (Up to terrace level)

Building B: 17.35 m (Up to terrace level)

Building C: 171.45 m (Up to terrace level)

Water Requirement • Fresh Water: 231 m3/day, Source: MCGM

• Recycled water : 216 m3/day

Chairman

37

Rain water

harvesting

• It is proposed to provide rain water collection tanks of capacity

170 m3 where water from the terrace water shall be carried

through underground piping.

• Surface runoff will be used to recharge the ground water sources

through 4 Nos. of ring wells

Wastewater

generated

407 m3/day

Capacity of STP 500 m3/day , STP technology: MBBR (Moving Bed Bio Reactor)

Solid Waste

Generation

• Existing: Dry quantity kg/day:- 256 kg/day Wet quantity kg/day:- 110 kg/day

• Proposed:

Dry quantity kg/day:- 1573 kg/day Wet quantity kg/day:- 674 kg/day

• E-Waste & Hazardous waste :

Existing Building: 1436 kg/day Proposed Building: 8824 kg/day


Disposal • Wet garbage will be treated in an Organic Waste Converter (OWC) and the dry garbage will be handed over to M.C.G.M.

• Waste oil which is generated due to usage of DG sets shall be

stored and subsequently given to the authorized hazardous waste

management agencies recognized by MPCB. • E-waste will be stored separately and recycled through authorized

dealers


Energy • Maximum demand: 8050 KW, Local Authority

• DG set: 1 x 1250 KVA

Energy

Conservation

• Use of energy efficiency VRV system for air conditioning.

• Use of CFL/ T5 lamps in common areas, Timer/ BMS Control on

external lighting.

• Use of Multiple lighting circuits, Group control of elevators.

• Transformers close to point of use, Low loss capacitors

• Insulation of roof in compliance with ECBC.

• Use of glass with low thermal conductivity and solar heat gain

coefficient.

• Solar lighting for landscape area.

Traffic Management • Parking area: 47728.72 m2

MCGM: 24650 m2, Captive: 23078.72 m

2

• Parking spaces provided: 4-Wheeler: MCGM: 493 Nos.

Captive: 746 Nos.

Chairman

38

Green Belt

Development

• RG on ground : 5564.28 m2

• RG on podium : 1492.50 m2 (25% of Net Plot Area)

Existing trees: 107 Nos., Trees to be Planted: 351 Nos. • List of the trees:

Sr Botanical Name Total Sr. Botanical Name Total

1 Alstonia Scholaris 16 10 Mangifera indica 16

2 Cassia Fistula 18 11 Lagerstromia flos-

reginae

20

3 Michelia champaca

alba

11 12 Pongamia pinnata 15

4 Azadirachta indica 19 13 Plumeria alba 15

5 Anthocephallus

cadamba

15 14 Saraca asoka 12

6 Bauhinia racemosa 13 15 Terminalia arjuna 18

7 Erythrina indica 14 16 Terminalia catappa 18

8 Murraya paniculata 12 17 Albizia lebbeck 12

9 Caryota urens 19 18 Areca catechu 23

Environment

Management Plan

Capital cost: 202.82 Lakhs

Operation and Maintenance cost: 54.03 Lakhs

Decision:


submitted the provisional certification for Green Building from Indian Green Building Council.

The proponent is directed to comply with the following observations:

1. Submit copy of LOI from MCGM for car parking.

2. Submit chronology of project from 1st appraisal and current stage of progress.

3. Submit copy of Environmental Clearance granted earlier, its compliance status and

report of Monitoring Committee.

4. Submit the consent for additional quantity of required water supply from competent

authority.

Chairman

39

5. The car parking for MCGM are worked out to be 50 m2 per car, which is much higher

than 30 m2 per car as per MoEF Guidelines. The car park area shall be reduced close

to 30 m2 per car.

6. Submit NOC from Airport Authority of India and CFO, Railway Authority and High

Rise Committee.

7. Justify the capacity of DG Set proposed for essential services.

8. Submit a note on energy conservation measures in accordance with ECBC guidelines.

9. Follow new DC Rules for fire and safety norms including fire-chute and fire-check

floors.

10. STP is already located in 3rd Basement, which should have been avoided. Proper

arrangements for ventilation and safety are to be ensured.

11. The project proponent shall draw up a sustainable model with appropriate EMP, as

the proposed EMP (O&M) is inadequate.

The PP has submitted EIA recently. The comprehensive assessment will be done after

submission of above compliance.

Chairman

40

Item No. 14

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed 2500 TCD of Sugar and 10 MW Co-

Generation Plant at Village Khamgaon, Tal Barshi, Dist. Solapur by M/s Aryan

Sugars Limited

(File No.: SEAC 2011/CR-9561 /TC-2) (TOR case)


Item No. 15

Date : 11.4.2012

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed “Gas bases Combined Cooling,

Heating and Power (CCHP) Plant of approx 40 MW capacity” at Mindspace

SEZ-Airoli, Plot No. 3, TTC, MIDC Area, Opp Airoli Railway Station, Thane

Belapur Road, Airoli, Navi Mumbai by M/s Serene Properties Pvt Ltd



Chairman

41

Item No. 16

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed expansion of industrial project (5.5

MW Natural Gas based Captive Power Plant) at Shrigaon, Post Poyanad, Tal

Alibag, Dist. Raigad by M/s Nitco Ltd.




Name of the Project : M/s Nitco Ltd

Category : 1(d) – B1

Project Proponent : M/s Nitco Ltd

Consultant M/s SKY LAB (Application in process with NABET)

Location of the project : Shrigaon, Post :- Poyanad, Tal :- Alibag Dist. Raigad, 402 108.

Type of Project : 5.5 MW Natural Gas based Captive Power Plant

Total Plot Area : 72 Acer

Project cost : 22 Cr (Expansion)

Products : 5.5 MW Natural Gas based Captive Power Plant

Raw materials : RLNG Gas

Water Requirement : Avg. 500 KL / Day for existing unit & Approx. 15 KL/Day will be

required for Gas Turbine Effluent Generation : 0.1 KL/Day from Cooling tower

ETP / STP capacity : Capacity of STP: 25 KL / Day, Capacity of ETP: 1 MLD

Rain water Harvesting : Rain Water Harvesting (RWH): 3000 KL/ Month. Collected in Pit &

used in process after filtration

Storm Water Drainage : ----

Solid waste management : Sr.

No

Source Qty(TP

M)

Form

(Sludge/Dry/

Slurry etc.)

Composition

1 Raw water

treatment plant

--- Sludge Clays

2 ETP -- Sludge Clays

3 Process -- -- --

4 Spent Catalyst -- -- --

Chairman

42

5 Oily Sludge

3 T/Y Oily Sludge

Lubricating

Oil

6 Others like

Battery waste, e

waste etc (Pl.

Specify

20 Nos /

Y Battery Lead Slag Air Pollution Control : The proposed power plant would use natural gas (RLNG) as fuel

which is very clean & Environment friendly fuel, which does not

contain any sulphur. Hence, there would not be any emission of

sulphur dioxide in the flue gas & SPM level will be less than 100

mg/Nm3, The NOx emission will be <158 PPM maximum as per

suppliers specifications. Stacks of 31m Height will be provided. The

of hot flue gases from Gas Turbine in spry drier will reduced air

pollution due to reduction in coal consumption.

Green Belt Development : Green belt area: 10 Acers. ( 40000 m2)

Existing nos. of trees: - 3000 nos., Proposed nos. of trees with plant

species- local species 500 nos.

Number trees being cut/replanted or compensated- No Tree Cutting

required or re-plantation

Energy Requirement : Total Power Requirement (MW); Source of Power: MSEB

Present (in existing): 3.6 MW, Proposed: 150 kV

DG Sets: Two Nos. of 1500 KVA

Environmental

Management Plan

:

Sr.

No. Item

Recurring

Cost per

annum

Capital

Cost

1 Air Pollution Control 1 Lac 20 Lac

2 Water Pollution Control 1.5 Lac 5 Lac

3 Noise Pollution Control -- 50 Lac

4 Environment Monitoring

and Management 1 Lac --

5 Reclamation

borrow/mined area NA NA

6 Occupational Health 0.5 Lac --

7 Green Belt 1 Lac 5 Lac

8 Solid waste management -- --

9 Others ( Pl. Specify) -- --

Total 4 Lac 80 Lac

Chairman

43

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. SEAC

noted the letter dated 12th April 2012, submitted by PP informing that the maximum power

generation will be 4.92 MW for average ambient inlet air temperature of 300C during winter

season and requested to allow to withdraw their application for EC for 5.5 MW Captive Power

Plant and grant exemption from the purview of EC considering the power generation capacity

below 5 MW. Hoverer considering Category no. 1(d) of Schedule of EIA Notification 2006, the

proposal falls under the purview of the Notification and EC is mandatory.

The project proponent has been advised to carry out public consultation and EIA study

considering the various comments made by the committee and the model TOR prescribed (Page

No.119) and then approach the committee for the appraisal. A QCI accredited consultant and

MOEF/NABL accredited lab shall be used for the preparation of EIA Report.

Chairman

44

Item No. 17

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed industrial project (237 MW-Gas Based

Combined Cycle Power Project) at Plot No. 60, 366/38 to 41, 366/43 to 45, 366/48

to 54, Village Dawadi, Tehsil Khed, Dist. Pune by M/s Khed Economic

Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.




Name of the Project : M/s Khed Economic Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. - 237 MW-Gas Based

Combined Cycle Power Project

Category : 1(d) – B

Project Proponent : M/s Khed Economic Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Location of the project : Plot No. 60, 366/38 to 41, 366/43 to 45, 366/48 to 54, Village

Dawadi, Tehsil Khed, Dist. Pune.

Type of Project : 237 MW-Gas Based Combined Cycle Power Project

Total Plot Area : 63 Acre


Products : 237 MW-Gas Based Combined Cycle Power Project

Raw materials : NG = 1.22 MMSCMD for power & 0.5 MMSCMD for non-power

utilities, LDO/HSD = 1111.65 KL/D

Water Requirement : 450 m3/Hr

ETP / STP capacity : ETP Proposed. Final disposal proposed in CETP of SEZ.

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. It was

noted that the proposal was already issued ToR in the 43rd meeting of SEAC held on 20

th April,

2011.

The project proponent has been advised to carry out EIA study considering the various

comments made by the committee including gas pipeline laying, risk assessment, DMP and the

model TOR prescribed (Page No 119), conduct public consultation (although it is located in SEZ

as the EC issued by MoEF for the SEZ does not specifically mention power generation in the list

Chairman

45

of industries approved) and then approach the committee for the appraisal. A QCI accredited

consultant and MOEF/NABL accredited lab shall be used for the preparation of EIA Report.

Item No. 18

Subject: Environmental clearance for proposed MMRDA Rental Housing project at the

Village Kon & Arivali, Taluka - Panvel, Dist. Raigad by M/s. Diana Infrastructure

Ltd.

(File No.: SEAC 2010/CR-526/TC2) (Compliance case)



Name of the Project : INDIABULLS GREENS

Project Proponent : M/s. Diana Infrastructure Ltd


Category : 8(a) – Cat. B

Previous

consideration/s

: 44th SEAC meeting held on 14

th September, 2011

48th SEAC meeting held during 27-30 December 2011

50th SEAC meeting held during 11, February,2012

Location of the

project

: S. NO 63/0, 64/1, 65/1 to 3, 66/2, 66/3, 66/5 to 66/8, 66/13, 66/14,

66/15, 67/1A, 67/1B, 67/2, 68/1 to 7, 69/1A, 69/1B, 69/2, 69/6, 70/1,

70/2, 71/1A + 2A + 5B, 71/1B, 71/3, 71/4 + 25K, 71/5A, 71/8B +

9K, 71/6A, 71/11, 71/12 to 16, 71/17A, 71/17B, 71/17K, 71/18 to 20,

71/21B, 71/22 + 21A, 71/23B, 71/24 + 23A, 71/25A + 5K, 71/25B,

71/8A +9B, 71/10 + 9A, 81/1, 81/3, 81/4, 81/5, 81/6, 81/7 to 14, 82/1

to 4, 83/1, 83/5A, 83/4A, 83/6 village Kon & Arivali, Taluka -

Panvel, Dist. Raigad.

Type of Project : MMRDA Rental Housing Project

Plot Area : Total Plot Area: 114,610.00 m2

Net Plot Area : 106,215.96 m2


up area

: FSI area: 4,24,863.84 m2

Total BUA: 7,93,628 sq. m.


project

: Rs. 1,775.58 Crores

No. of Buildings Sale Buildings: Residential:

3 Bldgs with B + LG + UG + Podium + 36 flrs


Chairman

46


Total Flats : 3130

Commercial

1 Bldg. with B + LGr + UG + 3 flrs of mall having multiplex with

1320 Seats 4th to 14

th floors of office area.

Rental Buildings:

Residential: 11 Bldgs of G+19 flrs , Flats: 6141 Nos. Shops: 8 Nos.,

Balwadi: 33 Nos, Welfare Center: 33 Nos, Society Offices: 11 Nos.

Height of building 133 m

Water Requirement Fresh Water: 4274 m3/day, Source: From MJP and 20 m

3/day

Source: From Potable Tankers

Recycled Water: 2390 m3/day

Rain water harvesting 5 rain water collection tanks of total capacity 2045 m3.

24 recharge pits with bore wells.

Wastewater generated Total Sewage: 5660 m3/day (For Rehabilitation: 3616 m

3/day, For

Sale: 2044 m3/day)

Capacity of STP For Sale : Residential :2015 KLD, For commercial :235 KLD

Rental:1 STP of 1000 KLD , 2 STP of 1500 KLD each

STP technology: SAFF

Solid Waste

Generation

Dry waste: 7755 kg/day ,

Wet quantity :- 16166 kg/day

E-Waste: 2445 kg/annum,

STP Sludge (Dry sludge): 849 Kg/day

Disposal • Construction phase debris and excavated material shall be used for

back filling and leveling of the plot and remaining will be disposed

to authorized sites.

• Solid waste generated from project will be segregated into dry and

wet garbage. Wet garbage will be treated in an Organic Waste

Converter (OWC) and the dry garbage will be handed over to the

authorized recycler.

• Waste oil which is generated due to usage of DG sets will be

handed over to authorized recyclers. E-waste will be stored

separately and recycled through authorized dealers.

• E - Waste will be stored separately and handed over to the

authorized recyler.

• Dried sludge from STP will be used as manure.

Energy Source of power : MSEDCL

Connected load : 69850 KW, Maximum demand : 34235 KW

DG Set: Sale:- Residential:- 15 Nos. of 750 KVA each & 2 Nos. of

630 KVAeach , Commercial:- 6 Nos. of 1600 KVA each

Rental:- 3 Nos. of 750 KVA each

Chairman

47

Energy Conservation • Energy conservation measures are proposed to reduce to Energy

• Copper conductor cables are specified for sizes of 16 sq mm and

below, this will reduce losses and improve reliability.

• All lifts shall be provided with AC variable voltage, variable

frequency drives (ACVVF).

• Power factor shall be maintained 0.95 or higher. This will reduce

electrical power distribution Losses in the installation.

• Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL’s) with high frequency ballast

shall be used for corridors And BOH areas. Energy efficient

fluorescent tube lights (T-5) shall be used. All fluorescent light

fixtures are specified to incorporate electronic chokes which have

less watt-loss compared to electro-magnetic chokes and result in

superior operating power factor. This indirectly saves energy.

Electronic chokes also improves life of the fluorescent lamps.

• Energy efficient fluorescent lamps & CFL lamps which give

approx. 30% more light output for the same watts consumed and

therefore require less nos. of fixtures and corresponding lower

point wiring costs.

• Solar water heating system for Premium buildings.

• An APFC relay based on thyristor switching is proposed to effect

the power factor correction / improvement within a few cycles of

deviation from the setting & also to reduce inrush currents.

• Transformers shall have minimum no load losses as compared to

conventional transformers. All cables shall be de-rated to avoid

heating during use. This also indirectly reduces losses and

improves reliability purposes.

Traffic Management Parking area: 141,898.61 m2

2-Wheeler: Nil , 4-Wheeler: 4227 Nos. , Public Transport: N.A.

6 mt. wide Internal Roads.

Green Belt

Development

R. G. Area : 20,058.49 Sq.mt

Numbers of trees to be planted Inside the plot: - 1105 Nos.

Environment

Management Plan

Construction phase: Rs. 44 lakhs

Operation Phase: Capital cost: Rs. 5443.42 lakhs

O&M Cost: Rs. 453.84 lakhs / annum

Decision:

Following queries were raised in the 44th

SEAC meeting held on 14th

September 2011:

1. The tenement density in rental portion is over 2000/ha, which is unacceptable and needs

drastic reduction.

Chairman

48

2. List of required amenities and those proposed, with details.

3. Infrastructure like water supply, drainage, roads, transport, electric supply available.

4. Whether Municipal services are available?

5. Town planning department’s or Collector’s letter approving the scheme with permissible

FSI, heights etc.

6. Attempts to reduce the total construction area to minimize congestion.

7. Fire fighting facilities in such locality where no municipality exists and where a large

population will stay.

8. Proposals for phasing of work, if any.

9. Details of availability of required infrastructure like roads, drainage system, municipal

services etc.

The site was visited by the SEAC on 30th

December, 2011 and following points were

incorporated in the minutes of 48th

SEAC meeting held during 27-30 December 2011:

It is observed that, another residential project, which includes MMRDA rental housing scheme is

being constructed on the adjoing plot. Total BUA for that neighbouring project is 6,03,339.07

sq.m. and the total BUA for the project under consideration is 7,93,628.50 sq.m. Considering

these, the following points including compliance of the points raised in the 44th meeting were

raised :

• The tenement density in the rental portion is above 2000/hector and is not environmentally

tenable. Such high density will cause serious health hazards caused by lack of adequate open

spaces, inadequate lighting and ventilation and living conditions. Even in slum development

schemes, the tenement density seldom exceeds about 1200 tenements per hector. In rural

areas and areas not yet developed, it will have to be substantially less. As buildings with very

high FSI are proposed, Local Authority should ensure that Regional Plan/ development plan

take care of these high density pockets and, if necessary, recast these plans.

• The facilities for municipal drainage are yet to be provided as there is no development in the

area, which is far away from Panvel. All areas around the site are undeveloped. Even water

supply will have to be made available by laying a pipe line of MJP away from the site. Public

amenities like hospitals, schools, transport, market, banks and post office, fire station, police

station, library etc. are not yet available in the area. The project proponents shall specify the

time frame to develop above said infrastructure.

Chairman

49

• It appears, the area falls outside Panvel Municipal jurisdiction and DC rules of Town

Planning Department should apply here. However MMRDA has evolved DC rules for this

plot exclusively under the rental scheme, which will not be available for areas surrounding

the plot. Thus a disharmonious development will take place with very high density

construction in one plot and rural type development in the surrounding areas. This may give

rise to slums, occupied by servants, labours and vendors etc. serving the habitants in the

rental scheme. The project proponent shall study these aspects and submit their mitigation

plans to avoid such unwanted developments.

• MMRDA should make arrangement to create dedicated corpus fund for each colony of

Rental Housing Scheme on organizational set-up along with the timely provision of adequate

funds required to ensure satisfactory implementation of EMP of the rental housing

component.

• MMRDA should enter into legally binding agreement/ issuing Notification or Government

Resolution with all corresponding local Authorities like CIDCO/ Municipal Corporation etc

regarding provision of necessary services like roads, transport facilities, electric supply,

drinking water supply and essential social infrastructures like hospitals, dispensaries, schools,

and other educational institutions, parks, gardens etc. This also should clearly specify the

responsibilities regarding the municipal services like water supply scheme, closed sewer lines

for discharge of excess treated effluent, waste disposal & treatment with appropriate

treatment facilities, treatment and disposal facilities of MSW generated , street light

maintenance, health facilities, fire fighting, educational facilities, regulating construction

activities, maintaining safety, health and inhabitants etc.

Following decision was taken in the 50th

SEAC held on 8th

to 11th

February, 2012:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent and the points

raised by SEAC in the earlier assessments. Representative of MMRDA clarified that the Rental

Housing Scheme with respect to the tenement density is being reviewed by the Government of

Maharashtra. The project proponents requested that considering the financial implications they

are ready to recast the proposal as per the direction of the SEAC to minimize the environmental

impacts. Considering this, SEAC decided that the project proponent may either wait for the final

Government decision on the Rental Housing Scheme or recast the proposal with approval of

MMRDA. The project proponent shall indicate their option. If their option is for the reduction of

tenement density, then they shall recast the proposal accordingly and approach SEAC for re-

appraisal. A tenement density of about 1000 per ha as seen in some of the SRA projects may be

aimed at. However, in case, the decision of Government on the tenements density is lower than

1000 per hector, the decision of the Government will be binding.

Chairman

50

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. MMRDA

representative was present during the meeting. The SEAC reiterated its opinion to PP that the

tenement density shall be restricted to 1000/ha for rental housing and PP shall recast the project

meeting the tenement density limit with appropriate reduction in the Rental Housing Scheme

Building and Sale building as Phase-I. However PP stated that they were not in a position to

recast the proposal considering the MMRDA letter. This has constrained SEAC to recommend

rejection of the proposal.

Chairman

51

Item No. 19

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed expansion of Oxime and Byproducts

and Manufacturing of New Product Ketoxime & Byproducts at Plot No G-54,

MIDC, Butibori, Salai Dhaba Dist Nagpur by M/s. Star Orechem International

Pvt. Ltd

(File No.: SEAC2011/CR679/TC2) (Compliance case)



Name of the Project : Proposed Expansion of Oxime and Byproducts and Manufacturing of

New Product Ketoxime & Byproducts

Project Proponent : M/s Star Orechem International Pvt .Ltd

Consultant M/s. Enviro Analysts & Engineers Pvt

Category 5(f) B1

Previous

consideration/s


held from 18th to 21st January, 2012

Location Plot No G-54, MIDC, Butibori, Salai Dhaba Dist Nagpur

Plant

Products Description Product Name

Product-I Oxime-51.5% : 250 MT/M

By-product Magnesium Sulphate :133.58 MT/M

By-product Sodium Sulphate : 37.70 MT/M

By-product Novolac Resin : 69.45MT/M

By-product Thinner : 49.5 MT/M

By-product Formalin(24%) : 22.66 MT/M

Product-II Ketoxime-50% :125MT/M

By-product Sodium Sulphate : 25.2MT/M

By-product Novolac Resin : 5.42MT/M

By-product Thinner :6.14MT/M

By-product HCl (30%) :29.47MT/M

By-product Polyaluminum chloride (PAC-30%)

:177.93MT/M

Chairman

52

Raw material Raw material for Oxime (250MT/Month) and Ketoxime (125

MT/Month):

Sr.

No.

Name of Raw Material Oxime

51.5%

(MT/M)

Ketoxime 50%

(MT/M)

1 Nonyl Phenol 169.8 35.2

2 Acetyl Chloride Nil 12.011

3 Magnesium metal 10.80 Nil

4 Formaldehyde 71.63 Nil

5 Hydroxylammonium

Sulphate

41.46 11.34

6 Toluene 11.11 1.824

7 Anhydrous Aluminium

Chloride

Nil 18.69

8 Calcium hydroxide Nil 13.70

9 Sulphuric Acid 54.38 10.85

10 Sodium Carbonate 26.43 1.27

11 Sodium Hydroxide Nil 29.41

12 Escaid-80 22.0 60.90

13 Solvent – TXIB 100.0 Nil

14 De-mineralized Water 571.02 293.16

Raw materials for PolyAcrylamide 90MT/M

Sr. No. Raw Material Quantity MT/M

1 Acrylamide 90

2 NaOH 13

3 Water 90

Raw Material for Surfactants 150 MT/M


1 Acrylamide 3.75

2 Ketonic Monomer

ADMEQUABA

11.25

3 Water 130.5

4 Emulsifier 0.75

5 Xylene 3.75

Raw material for Xanthate RM 450 MT/M

Chairman

53


1 Carbon do Sulphide 205.2

2 Isopropyl alcohol 162

3 Caustic Soda 108.0

Raw Material for DE Phthalate RM 300 MT/M


1 Monoethylphthalate

Recycle

3.49

2 Alcohol recycle 49.17

3 Sulphuric acid 3.13

4 Phthalic Anhydride 199.17

5 Fresh alcohol 100.83

6 Soda ash 3.34

7 Water 19.12

Total plot area 40,500 sq .m


project

Rs. 9.00 Cr.

Total water

requirement

• Water Source : MIDC, Butibori

• Total water requirement : 149.1KLD

• Domestic : 4.0 KLD

• Cooling/Boiler : 114.5 KLD

• Industrial: 16.6 KLD

• Gardening : 10.0 KLD

Energy Requirement • Requirement: 240 MVA, Source: MSEB

• Alternate supply for essential service

• Existing 1 nos. of D. G. set with capacity of 180 KVA will be

used as back up for emergency there is a proposal to install

another DG set of capacity 250/350 KVA..

• Type of fuel : HSD

Green belt area 10000 sq.mt.

Fuel oil used Sr Fuel Existing Expansion

1 LDO 250 litres/day --

2 Bio-mass (Peanut Shelf

with binder)

5 T/day 5 T/day

3 HSD 17 litres/hr 18 litres/hr

Air pollution control

measures

• Use of Scrubber

• Fume / Dust Collection System (Wet Type) for Induction Furnace

along with Mechanical Dust Collector Type with Dia : 36 m, Ht :

Chairman

54

0.7 m of Performance: Collection of 97 to 99% dust particles

Water pollution

control measures

• Sewage generated will be treated in Septic tanks & Soak pits &

treated sewage will be used for green belt area.

• Industrial effluent will be given primary treatment in proposed

ETP of 50 KLD and then sent to CETP, Butibori.

Solid waste

management

# Source Total

Quantity

Mitigation

A Industrial

1 Chemical sludge from

waste water treatment

0.4MT/Month Sent to

CHWTSDF,

Butibori .

2 Discarded

Containers/Barrels/Liners

(Used Polythene bags)

1.5

MT/Month

Sent to

CHWTSDF,

Butibori.

B Domestic Waste 0.694

MT/Month

Composting

C Gardening Waste 1.16

MT/Month

Composting

EMP Sr. No Description

Cost (Rs in

Lakhs)

Operational Phase

1 Effluent Treatment Plant

(Pretreatment) 12

2 Air Pollution Control Measures 3.0

3 Landscaping 10

4 Solid Waste Management 15

5 Health Care & Safety 20

Total 60

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. The

Project proponent submitted the revised EIA Report and pre-feasibility report. The PP has

complied with all the points raised in the 49th meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal

Committee (SEAC) held from 18th to 21

st January, 2012. SEAC decided to recommend the

proposal for Environmental Clearance.

Chairman

55

Item No. 20

Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed Organic chemical manufacturing unit

at Plot No. K-53,MIDC Butibori, Dist. Nagpur by M/s. Jeevika Spachem Pvt. Ltd.

(File No.: SEAC2012/CR 001/TC2) (Compliance case)



Name of the Project : Organic chemical manufacturing unit

Project Proponent : M/s. Jeevika Spachem Pvt. Ltd.

Consultant : M/s. Enviro Analysts & Engineers Pvt Ltd

Category : 5(f) B1

Location : G-54, MIDC-Butibiri, Dist Nagpur

Products :

Sr Name of Products Capacity

1 Esters 50 MT/ M

2 Surfactants / Sulphosuccinates 30 MT/M

3 Defoamers / Antifoamers 50 MT/M

4 Emulsifying agents 20 MT/M Raw material :

Name of Product Raw Material

S.M.S (Sorbitan Mono Stearate)

Yield 1600 Kg

Stearic Acid: 1056 Kg

Sorbitol: 677Kg

Caustic Soda: 5 Kg

S.M.P (Sorbitan Mono Plamitate)

Yield 1600 Kg

Palmic Acid: 1400 Kg

Sorbitol: 1000 Kg

Caustic Soda: 5 Kg

G.M.S. (Glycerol Mono Stearate)

Yield 1600 Kg

Stearic Acid: 1270 Kg

Glycerin: 411 Kg

Caustic Soda: 3 Kg

S.M.O (Sorbitol Mono Oleate)

Yield 2200 Kg

Rice Bran Fatty Acid / Oleic

Acid: 1450 Kg

Sorbitol: 935 Kg

Caustic Soda: 4.1Kg

Di - Octyl Sulphosuccinate

Yield 1750Kg

Stage I:

2 EHA (2 Ethlyl hexa Alchol):

955 Kg

Meleic Anhydride: 360 Kg

PTSA (Para Toluene Sulphonic

Chairman

56

Acid): 14 Kg

Stage II

Dioctyl Maleate: 800 Kg

Sodium Bi Sulphide: 260 Kg

Methanol: 400 Lit

Defoamers / Antifoamers

Yield 3000 Kg

S.M.O

O.S.A.A

Fussal Oil Total plot area 1974.00 m

2


project

Rs. 93.00 Lakhs .

Total water

requirement

Total water requirement : 7 KLD, MIDC, Butibori

Domestic : 1 KLD

Industrial process : 0.5

Industrial CoolingTower : 2 KLD

Reactors and Tools Washing: 1.5KLD

Gardening : 2 KLD

Energy Requirement Requirement: 50 HP, Source: MSEB

Power back up: 1 nos. of D. G. set with capacity of 25 KVA will be

used as back up for emergency

Type of fuel used: Diesel

Green belt area 615.48 sq.mt.

Fuel oil used S. No. Fuel Total

1 LDO 90 KL/Annum

2 Diesel (DG set) 3000 Lit//Annum Air pollution control

measures

Use of Scrubber.

Fume / Dust Collection System (Wet Type) for Induction Furnace

along with venture scrubber wet type, Inter gas volume 15,000cum/hr

Cyclonic type Scrubber : Dia : 1600mm, Ht: 6000mm, Performance

Collection of 97 to 99% dust particles

Water pollution

control measures

Sewage generated will be treated in Septic tanks & Soak pits & treated

sewage will be used for green belt area.

Industrial effluent will be given primary treatment in proposed ETP of

3 KLD and then sent to CETP, Butibori.

Chairman

57

Solid waste

management

# Source Total Quantity Mitigation

A Non-Biodegradable

1 Discarded

Containers/Barrels/Liners

1.0 MT/Month Sold to

authorized

parties

B Biodegradable

1 Domestic Waste 0.75 MT/Month Composting

2 Chemical sludge from

waste water treatment

0.6MT/Month Sold to

authorized

parties

C Gardening Waste 0.075MT/Month Composting

Environment

Management Plan

Construction phase:

Sr Description In Lacs

1. Potable water requirement for workers 0.5

2. Health Care 1.0

Total 1.5

Operation Phase Capital Cost

Sr. No Description Cost (Rs in Lakhs)

Operational Phase

1 ETP(Pretreatment) 3.0

2 Rain Water Harwesting 0.10

3 Air Pollution Control Measures 0.10

4 Landscaping 0.50

5 Solid Waste Management 0.50

6 Health Care & Safety 0.75

7 Environmental Monitoring plan 0.50

Total 5.45

Decision:


Project proponent submitted the revised EIA Report and pre-feasibility report. The PP has

complied with all the points raised in the 49th meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal

Chairman

58

Committee (SEAC) held from 18th to 21

st January, 2012. SEAC decided to recommend the

proposal for Environmental Clearance.

Item No. 21

Subject: Environmental clearance for the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme - Ganesh Nagar

Magathane Rahiwashi (SRA) Co-Op. Hsg Soc. Ltd at village Magathane,

Western Express Highway, Ganesh Nagar, Borivali East by M/s. Dhanshree

Developers




Name of the Project : Slum Rehabilitation Scheme - Ganesh Nagar Magathane Rahiwashi

(SRA) Co-Op. Hsg Soc. Ltd

Project Proponent : M/s. Dhanshree Developers

Consultant M/s. Green Circleing

Category 8(a) B2

Previous

consideration/s

49th meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC)

held from 18th to 21st January, 2012

Location of the

project

: Plot bearing CTS No. 182 (pt.) & 191 (pt.) of village Magathane,

Western Express Highway, Ganesh Nagar, Borivali East, Mumbai

400 066

Type of Project : SRA project

Plot Area : 12179.60 m2


up area

: • FSI : 41,161.50 m2

• Construction BUA (FSI + Non FSI) : 78,971.56 m2


project

: Rs. 125 Crores

No. of Buildings : • One Rehab Building with 3 wings: Gr + 17 Floors

• One Sale Building with 1 wing: B+ Gr + 4P + E level + refuge

floor+26 Floors

Existing structure &

demolish of it-

Details with disposal

• Site is covered with slums .

• Slums will be demolished & debris will be handed over to

authorized vendors

Height of the

building

107.20 m

Chairman

59

Water Requirement Water requirement : 502 m3/day

Fresh water: For Sale: 238 m3/day, For REHAB : 87 m

3/day

Recycled water: For Sale: 53 m3/day, For REHAB : 124 m

3/day

Rain water

harvesting

• In REHAB building 3No. of Recharging pits are proposed

• In Sale building 4 No. of Recharging pits are proposed

• Recharge pit size: REHAB : 1m x 1m & 2m dia; SALE : 1m x

1m & 2.5m dia

Storm water

drainage

Dimensions of Storm Water Drain For REHAB

Width 450 mm, Depth 450 mm, Slope : 0.00667

Discharge : 924 .75 m3 /hr

Dimensions of Storm Water Drain For SALE

Width 450 mm, Depth 450 mm, Slope : 0.00667

Discharge : 924 .75 m3 /hr

Wastewater

generated

370 m3/day

Capacity of STP • Rehab : 300m3/day

• Sale : 100 m3/day, STP Technology: SAFF Technology

Solid Waste

Generation


• Non Biodegradable waste: 641 kg/day

• STP sludge: 4 m3/day.

Disposal • Construction debris will be reuse on site premises. The substratum

removed will be used for back filling, leveling, and road

construction.

• Entire top soil will be conserved and used later in landscape area

for plantation

• Waste oil which is generated due to usage of DG sets shall be

stored and subsequently given to the authorized hazardous waste

management agencies recognized by MPCB.

• Dry garbage will be segregated & disposed off to recyclers.

• Wet garbage will be composted by using the OWP and used as

organic manure for landscaping.

• Sewage sludge will be composted and then used as manure.

• E-waste will be stored separately and disposed through authorized

recyclers.

Energy • Demand Load: 4570 KW

• DG Set: 1 Nos. x 200 KVA (REHAB), 1 Nos. x 250 KVA

(SALE)

Energy

Conservation

• Power Capacitors are proposed for load power factor correction

and to maintain a healthy power situation. This also results in less

demand load factor for the project.

Chairman

60

• All lifts are proposed on VFD drives which results in 20% saving

in power consumption and approximately 20% savings in energy

consumption.

• Most of the common area lighting are proposed to work on high

energy efficient lamps (CFL) as specified in bureau of energy

efficiency and T-5 & T-8 Tube lights, which again results in

saving in general consumption.

• External lighting, 30% of the external lighting is proposed on

solar. These are set of lighting which are placed at critical

junctions and which would be lit round the night. Otherwise the

other 70% lighting is on timer circuits to achieve the max. saving

Traffic Management • Total No. of Parking Provided: 4- Wheeler Parking: SALE

Building : 332 Car, REHAB Building: 20 Nos.

Green Belt

Development

• Total R.G. Area : 1172.22 m2

• Proposed Tree Plantation: 76 Nos.

Plant Name Common

name

No. C/C Height Canopy

Pongamia

Pinnata

Karanj 14 5000 4500 6000

Cassia Fistula Bahava 5 4000 4500 5000

Ceasalpinia

Pulcherima

Shankasur 12 2000 2400 3000

Murraya

Paniculata

Kunti 23 2000 2400 3000

Bauhnia

Racemosa

Kanchan 03 2000 3000 3000

Saraca Asoca Sita Ashok 10 4000 3000 5000

Caryota Urens Bherli

Maad

09 4000 3000 5000

Environment

Management Plan

Sale bldg: capital cost: 56 lakhs and O&M cost: 17.7 lakhs/annum.

Rehab bldg: capital cost: 48 lakhs and O&M cost: 7.3 lakhs/annum.

Decision:

Chairman

61

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. The proponent

is directed to comply with the following observations:

1. It is noted that MCGM has agreed to provide 45 LPCD water for rehab portion only. PP

shall make adequate and sustainable arrangements for meeting additional water

requirement.

2. Reduce car parking area from proposed 48 m2 per car to 30 m

2 per car and submit the

revised plan accordingly.

3. STP treated water tanks shall be relocated away from the UG tanks for drinking water,

both in SRA and Sale buildings.

4.

5. The project proponent shall draw up a sustainable EMP model for both Rehab and Sale

projects with appropriate budget, as the proposed budget is inadequate. There shall be a

corpus fund for rehab portion. Provision of staff and equipment shall be also included in

the EMP budget.

6. Appropriate RWH to be considered and planned as the water table is very high.

7. Storm water drainage calculations shall be revised comprehensively and resubmitted.

8. New DC Rules shall be followed for fire and safety norms including fire-chute and fire-

check floors.

Chairman

62

Item No. 22

Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed SRA project "EKTA CHS" on

property bearing CTS No. 2603(pt) at village Dahisar, Tal. Borivali, S N Dube

Road, Rawalpada, Dahisar (East), Mumbai by M/s. Khushi Builders &

Developers (New case)


Chairman

63

Item No. 23

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed construction of Residential Project with

MMRDA Rental Housing Scheme ‘Auralis’ at Thane by M/s. Mercantile Plastic

Pvt. Ltd. (Name Changed to Deep Homes & Constructions Pvt. Ltd.)

(File No.:SEAC2011/CR 949/ TC2) (New case)



Name of the Project : Proposed construction of Residential Project with MMRDA Rental

Housing Scheme

Project Proponent : M/s. Mercantile Plastic Pvt. Ltd. (Name Changed to Deep Homes &

Constructions Pvt. Ltd.)

Consultant : M/s. Mahabal Enviro Engg. Pvt. Ltd.

Location of the

project

: Plot Bearing CTS No. 136/B at village Hajuri, Thane

Type of Project : Construction project

Plot Area : 8,420.28 m2

Category : 8(a) B2

Previous

consideration/s

Nil


up area

: FSI Area: 31,861.13 m2 (Sale: 23,866.72 m

2. + 7944.41 m

2)

Non FSI area: 23,206.17 m2

Total Built up Area: 55,067.28 m2

Ground coverage 60%


project

: 98 Crore

No. of Buildings : Building No. 1 (Sale): B + St + P + 32 Flrs

Building No. 2 (Sale): B + St + P + 32 Flrs

Building No. 3 (MMRDA): Stilt + 20 Flrs

Maximum Height of

building

: • Sale Bldg: 102.55 m

• MMRDA Bldg: 61.35 m

Total Water

Requirement

: • Fresh water: 314 m3/day

• Recycled water: 164 m3/day

Sewage Generation : 376 m3 /day

STP capacity : 425 m3/day (150 m3 for Sale Buildings and 275 m3 for Rental Building)

Chairman

64

STP Technology : SAFF – Submerged Aerated fixed Film Technology

Rain water

Harvesting

: • 2 RWH Tanks of Total capacity 150 m3

• 3 Nos. of Recharge wells of 2m dia and 3 m depth

Storm Water

Drainage

: Size of SWD - 0.3 m X 0.5 m

Solid waste

Generation

: • Biodegradable waste: 697 kg/day


• STP Sludge: 4 m3/day

Solid waste

Management

: • Dry garbage will be segregated & disposed off to recyclers.

• Wet garbage will be composted using Vermi Composting

Technology and used as organic manure for landscaping.

• STP sludge will be used as manure.

Green Belt

Development

: • R.G.Area Provided : 1711.18 m2 (20.32 %)

• RG area on ground: 776.62 sq. m.

• RG area on podium: 934.56 sq. m.

• Existing trees: 67 nos.

• Trees to be cut: 33 nos.

• Trees to be retained: 34 nos.

• No of trees to be planted: 215 Nos.

Energy Requirement : Energy: 4.1 MW

Capacity of DG Set provided for Sale will be 350 kVA and for Rental

180 kVA

Traffic Management : • Parking area provided: Gross Parking Area: 14,128.35 m2

• 2W: 249 Nos.

• 4W: 546 Nos.

Energy

Conservation

measures

: • Solar Panel lights will be installed for common facilities wherever

possible.

• Solar street lights are proposed for common areas such as open

spaces, pathways, RG etc.

Environmental

Management Plan

• Capital cost: Rs. 242 lakhs

• O & M Cost: 51 lakhs/annum

Decision:



Chairman

65

SEAC noted change in name of project proponent from M/s Mercantile Plastic Pvt Ltd to M/s

Deep Homes & Construction Pvt Ltd.

PP has demolished the existing structures to clear the site without obtaining the prior

environmental clearance. Environment Department may look into matter and take necessary

action.


1. Submit a note on the history of the plot and present status at the site



270/2008- IA.III dated 7th February, 2012, for buildings with height greater than 60 m

the minimum width of the road (right of way) is 30 and the nearest fire station should be

located within distance of 2 km. In this case, the width of the road to as 18 m and the

height of the sale proposed is more than 102.55 m. Therefore, the PP shall recast the

project proposal by restricting the height complying with the MoEF guidelines for High

Rise Building.

4. Tenement density in Rental portion is about 2250/ha. The Committee is of the opinion

that it shall be restricted to maximum 1000/ha as such a high tenement density will affect

not only the environment but also the health of the residents..

5. Details of car parking justifying the local norms shall be submitted.

6. Submit the consent for required water supply from competent authority. If ground water

source is to be utilized as an alternate arrangement, the qualitative and quantitative of the

same shall be submitted.

7. STP for rental portion shall not be buried but located with adequate approach area, proper

ventilation and lighting for O&M.

8. Details of sludge disposal shall be submitted.

9. It is desirable to follow HRC Guidelines of MCGM in the interest of safety.

Chairman

66

10. Follow new DC Rules for fire and safety norms including fire-chute and fire-check

floors.


planted (nos., size, age, and species) as per MoEF guidelines.

12. Small trees / shrubs (100 nos.) to be planted on Podium-RG

13. Submit Disaster Management Plant.

14. Ground coverage is more than 60%. The same shall be reducted to 50%.

15. Adequate ventilation measures need to be provided below podium and for the parking

area.

16. Submit large scale layout showing amenity spaces, RG area, water tanks and internal

roads.

Chairman

67

Item No. 24

Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed Slum Rehabilitation Project at Laxmi

Nagar, Andheri Link Road, Ghatkopar (East), ‘N’ Ward, Mumbai by M/s. Sri.Sai

Deep Realtors Pvt. Ltd




Name of the Project : Construction project under SRA scheme

Project Proponent : M/s. Sri Sai Deep Realtors Pvt. Ltd


Category : 8(a)- B2

Previous

consideration/s

: Nil

Location of the

project

: CTS No.184/C(Pt.) at Laxmi Nagar, Andheri Link Road, Ghatkopar

(East), ‘N’ Ward, Mumbai

Type of Project : SRA Project

Plot Area : 4,106.0 m2


up area

: FSI: 12,311.91 m2

Non - FSI: 16768.44 m2

Total BUA : 29071.61 m2

Ground coverage area 54 %


project

: Rs.56.08 Cr

No. of Buildings : One composite building of 2 wings- wing A and Wing B

Rehabilitation:

Wing A : Stilt(Pt) + 15 +16 (Pt) upper floors

Flats: 200 flats.

Shops: 3Nos.

Balwadi: 3 Nos.

Welfare Centre: 3 Nos.

Society office: 2 Nos.

Mahila Mandal : 1 No.

Sale Building:

Wing B: 2 level basement + Ground (Pt) +Podium+1st to 14

th +15(Pt)

upper floors.

Flats: 114 flats. (Polyclinic, Pathology, Diagnostic, Clinic, Nursing

home : 5 Nos.)

Height of building 50.05 m (Up to terrace level)

Chairman

68

Water Requirement Fresh Water: 150 m3/day, Source: MCGM

Recycled water : 79 m3/day

Rain water harvesting 2 Rain water collection tanks of size 22 m3.

Wastewater generated 197 m3/day

Capacity of STP 217 m3/day, STP technology: MBBR Technology

Solid Waste

Generation

Biodegradable waste: 516 kg/day

Non biodegradable waste: 220 kg/day

STP Sludge (Dry sludge): 30 kg/day

Disposal Wet garbage will be treated in an Organic Waste Converter (OWC)

and the dry garbage will be handed over to M.C.G.M.

Dry STP sludge to be used as manure.

Energy For Rehabilitation: 300.8 Kw, and for Sale: 370.9 Kw.

DG set: 250 KVA x 1 No.

Energy Conservation Use of high energy efficient lamps (CFL, T5 lamps etc).

Use of all devices with low internal losses

Use of solar lights for the external street lighting poles

Insulated roof in order to reduce heat gain from sun.

Traffic Management Parking area = 3384,12 m2, 4‐Wheeler : 76 Nos

Width of internal rods: 4.0 - 6.0 m

Green Belt

Development

Total R.G area: 340.93 Sq. m. (8.30%)

New trees to be planted: 51 Nos.

Existing trees: 1 No., Trees to retained: 1 No.

Sr. Tree Varieties Botanical Name Total

1 Peepal (Existing) Ficus religiosa 01

2 Karanj Pongamia pinnata 09

3 Maharukh Alianthus excelsa 14

4 Ketesavar Bombax ceiba 06

5 Shirish Albizzia lebbeck 11

6 Neem Azadiracta indica 11 Environment

Management Plan

Capital cost: 82.29 Lakhs

Operation and Maintenance cost: 39.73 Lakhs

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. It appears that

the sale building has been already built fully knowing that total BUA exceed construction area

20000 m2, however no EC was obtained. Environment Department may look into matter and take

necessary action.


Chairman

69

1. Religious structures shall not be demolished.

2. Separate provisions shall be made for STP, Solid waste management, Environment

management plan for Rehab and Sale components.

3. Water supply (45 LPCD) is available only for rehab. Submit details of availability of

additional water supply in respect of the source, treatment and storage.

4. RG area is barely 8% and is located only near rehab building. No RG is proposed for sale

building.Therefore RG shall be properly distributed.

5. Underground water tanks shall be relocated away from STP to avoid contamination.

6. Number of parking shall be restricted to 68 as per requirement and area per car parking

shall be restricted to 30 m2 per car as the proposed is 46 m

2 per car.

7. A part of plot goes into the proposed road widening. This part is not deducted from area

calculations. The area calculations shall be revised accordingly and submitted.

8. Both Consultant and PP has not looked into many aspects of welfare of occupants and

their safety. The details of the same shall be submitted.


Chairman

70

Item No. 25

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Residential Township at village

Kathivali,Tal.Shahapur, Distt. Thane M/s. Smart Value Homes Limited. (New

Case)



Name of the Project : Residential Township

Project Proponent : M/s. Smart Value Homes Limited.

Consultant : M/S Enviro Analysts & Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Category : 8(b) B1

Previous

consideration/s

: Nil

Location of the

project

: S. No. 279, 281, 285, 296, 298, 301, 305, 306, 310, 314, 315, 340,

342, 343, 318, 304, 311, 286, 287, 312, 288,302, 308, 309, 317, 341,

344 at Village Khativali, Tal- Shahapur, Dist- Thane


Plot Area : 2, 04,160.00 m2


up area

: Total FSI area for Phase-I = 1,05,096.63 m2,

Total FSI area for Phase II = 34,548.90 m2

Total Non FSI area- 10,717.98 m2.

Total Built Up area- 1,50,363.42 m2

Ground coverage area 27.25 %


project

: Rs. 241 crores

No. of Buildings : 70 Residential Buildings: 62 Bldgs(G+4), 8 Buildings(G+3)

121 Row Houses (G+1);

Highway Retail (G+1): 20 shops, 5 Restaurants, 1 Food court;

Retail Building 2 (G+1) : 22 shops;

Health care (G+1);

Community Center (G+1);

Club House(G+1);

Primary School.

Height of building 14.95 m maximum

Water Requirement Total water requirement: 1358.34 m3/day

Fresh Water: 791.17 m3/day

Recycled water : 567.17 m3/day

Rain water harvesting Rain Water Harvesting through Bore well Recharge Pits:

Size: (L=4.54 m x B=4 m x D= 3.0 m)

Total rainwater harvested: 4,438.18 m3/Day

Chairman

71

No. of Bore well recharge pits: 21 nos.

Runoff from the terrace shall be stored in storage tanks. Paved area

runoff shall be diverted to bore well recharge pits for the ground

water recharging. The overflow will be diverted to storm water drain

Wastewater generated 1086.672 m3/day

Capacity of STP STP with process SAFF Technology of 2nos having total capacity of

1655 KLD will be provided for the waste water treatment.

Solid Waste

Generation

Biodegradable waste: 2.9 T /day

Non biodegradable waste: 2.17 T /day

STP Sludge (Dry sludge): 272 Kg/day

Bio-Medical waste

Non infectious waste:-12 Kg/day

Infectious waste:-1.4 Kg/day

Hazardous waste:-0.7 Kg/day

Disposal • Organic waste will be sent to OWC, required amount of manure

from OWC will be used and rest will be handed over to the

vendors & Inorganic waste will be handed over to concerned

governing body.

• The biomedical waste will be handed over to the authorized

vendors for the further disposal.

• Some part of the sludge will be used for landscaping purpose

while the remaining 30kg/day will be handed over to the MoEF

certified vendor for safe disposal.

Energy Supply Capacity : 2420 KVA

9 no of DG set for essential power supply having capacities of

160,100,100,75,250,125,630,500,315(KVA)

Energy Conservation • Roofs will be insulated to minimize heat gain with 80 mm

expanded polystyrene or equivalent insulation.

• Light fixtures will be used with energy saving CFL & T5

fluorescent tube with electronic chocks.

• DG sets shall be PLC controlled to optimize their usage based on

the actual load requirements

• Use of Solar energy for street & landscape lightings.

• Small capacity transformers having low no load and load losses.

• Selection of Energy efficient equipments (BEE STAR RATED).

Traffic Management 4‐Wheeler : 826 nos.

Width of internal rods: 12 m

Chairman

72

Green Belt

Development

Name of Trees No. Of trees

Heliconia Psittacorum@450mmc/c 5753

Heliconia Rostrata@450mmc/c 1261

Alpina Zerembet@450mmc/c 991

Alpina Purpurata@450mmc/c 648

Bougainvillae Formosa@1mc/c 80

Bougainvillae Themma@1mmc/c 2632

Raphis Palms@450mmc/c 3980

Golden Durranta@450mmc/c 3029

Multicolour Acalypha@450mmc/c 2842

Cordyline Terminalis@450mmc/c 3266

Hawaiian Hibiscus@450mmc/c 2698

Hemelia Patens@450mmc/c 960

Pandanus Dwarf@300mmc/c 1989

Coedium Variagatum@300mmc/c 2261

Draceana Reflexa@300mmc/c 524

Spider Lily@300mmc/c 2970

Ophiogon Jaburan@300mmc/c 4046

Wadelia@300mmc/c 3463

Psittacorum Samanea Saman@10mc/c 101

Alstonia Scholaris@8mc/c 67

Lagerstroemia Floribunda@8mc/c 154

Lagerstroemia Speciosa@8mc/c 112

Drypetes Roxbhurghii@8mc/c 158

Azadirachta Indica 35

Cassia [email protected]/c 49

Cassia [email protected]/c 51

Ravanella Madagascurensis@6mc/c 14

[email protected]/c 86

Ficus [email protected]/c 34

Areca [email protected]/c 448

Bambusa [email protected]/c 141

Bahiunia [email protected]/c 118

Total R.G Area 19,055.05 m2

A Shrubs and Ground Cover

Area

8,071.12 m2

B Lawn 52,766.0 m2

C Grass Pavers at Parking 12,575.0 m2

D Pavers at Pathway 8,903.46 m2

Total Green Area 73,412.12 m2

Chairman

73

Taebuibia [email protected]/c 120

Taebuibia [email protected]/c 149

Delonix [email protected]/c 232

Cayrota Cuminghii@6mc/c 79

Plumeria Alba 46

Plumeria Rubra 22 Environment

Management Plan

Capital cost: 540 lakhs

Operation and Maintenance cost: 33.5 lakhs /annum

Decision:


submitted the Pre-certification for Green Building from Indian Green Building Council. The PP

has not yet completed with the conditions of EC letter for the Phase 1 issued on 21st October,

2011 ,viz ...

(i) There shall be no discharge of surplus treated effluent to any nala, stream or any other

water body outside the project. The surplus effluent (after meeting the requirement for

flushing etc.) should have to be used for taking up gardening and horticultural

developments on the balance area of about 10 hectares.

(ii) PP shall lay a pipeline for carrying the surplus water to appropriate site as discussed in

SEAC & SEIAA Meetings.

(iii) Occupation/Third Party Rights should not be created unless and until water supply is

assured.

Without compliance of above conditions for Phase-I, application for Phase-II can not be

considered. PP has been advised to comply with the conditions mentioned in the EC granted for

Phase-I.


Chairman

74

Item No. 26

Subject: Environmental clearance for the SRA Project "Om Ganesh Nagar SRA Sahkari

Gruh Nirman Sanstha (prop) on plot bearing CTS No. 200 (pt) of Village

Wadhavali, Taluka Kurla, Mumbai by M/s. Deserve Exim Pvt Ltd

(File No.: SEAC 2010/CR558/TC2) (New Case)


Chairman

75

Item No. 27

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Cement Grinding Unit (4.95 MTPA at

Additional Sinnar MIDC,Village Musalgaon, Dist. Nashik by M/s Eurotas

Infrastructure Limited (TOR case)



Name of the Project : M/s Eurotas Infrastructure Limited, (Cement Grinding Unit)

Category : 3(b) – B1

Project Proponent : M/s Eurotas Infrastructure Limited

Consultant M/s Earthcare Labs. Pvt. Ltd.

Location of the project : Additional Sinnar MIDC,Village Musalgaon, Dist. Nashik

Latitude: 190 50’ 07” N to 19

0 54’ 37” N

Longitude: 740 00’ 53” E to 74

0 09’ 07”

MSL= 633 m

Type of Project : Cement Plant

Total Plot Area : 77 Acres (BUA = 50 Acres)


Products : Cement (CPC & OPC) - 4.95 MTPA

Raw materials : Clinker (3.56 MTPA), Fly ash (1.24 MTPA), Gypsum (0.17 MTPA),

Water

Water Requirement : 780 KLD ( Source – MIDC)

Effluent Generation : Domestic = 8 KLD

Rain water Harvesting : Ponds of total capacity of 600 m3 and 6 recharge pits.

Storm Water Drainage : MIDC Drain

Solid waste management : No domestic solid waste will be generated.

Small quantity of commercial waste generated will be recycled

through authorized dealers.

Air Pollution Control : Bag filters, dust suppression system

Green Belt Development : • Green belt area : 25.5 Acres (103195 m2)

• Pant species will be planted all along the internal roads and

boundary of the unit.

• Beautiful garden, lawn, waterfall, fountain etc. will be

developed. • Proposed to select plant saplings considering the parameters

as type, height, leaf area, crown area, growing nature, water

requirement etc. species such as Neem, badam, Imli, Umbar,

Gulmohar, Pipal, Katahal etc will be planted.

• About 500 saplings in the first year of commissioning

Chairman

76

Energy Requirement : 34 MW

Environmental

Management Plan

: Capital Cost of environmental protection measures =Rs. 8.7 Cr Recurring cost: Rs. 1.66 Cr/Y

Decision:


The project proponent has been advised to carry out the EIA study considering the various

comments made by the committee and the model TOR prescribed (Page No 104) and then

approach the committee for the appraisal. A QCI accredited consultant and MOEF/NABL

accredited lab shall be used for the preparation of EIA Report.

Chairman

77

Item No. 28

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed expansion of industrial project

[Expansion of captive power plant] at S. N. 146 to 163, 165 to 190, Tal. Koparna,

Dist. Chandrapur by M/s. Manikgarh Cement


The project proponet was absent.

Item No. 29

Subject: TOR for the proposed industrial project at Shilapur Village, S.N. 192 to 204 and

220, Nashik by M/s Utility Infrastructure & Works Pvt. Ltd., ( Nashik Grinding

& RMC Project)


The project proponet was absent.

Item No. 30

Subject: Environmental clearance for the Hill station area development project at Village:

Mazgaon, Saltar, Barpe Bu., Bhambarde, Ekole, Ghutke and Adgaon, Taluka –

Mulshi, Pune by M/s. Maharashtra Valley View Pvt. Ltd



Chairman

78

Item No. 31

Subject: Environmental clearance for the construction project under SRA scheme at S. No.

263((pt), CTS No. 6A(PA), 6A/12/5(pt), 6A/12/6(pt), 6A(pt), Charkop, Malvani,

Village Kadivali (W), Mumbai by M/s. Shakti Property Developers Pvt. Ltd. (New

case)

(File No.: SEAC 2011/CR 951/TC2) (New Case)



Name of the Project : Construction project under SRA scheme

Project Proponent : M/s. Shakti Property Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Consultant : SGM Corporate Consultants Pvt. Ltd

Category : 8(a)- B2

Location of the

project

: S. No. 263((pt), CTS No. 6A(PA), 6A/12/5(pt), 6A/12/6(pt), 6A(pt),

Charkop, Malvani, Village Kadivali (W), Mumbai

Type of Project : SRA Project

Plot Area : 23,122.00 m2


up area

: Total Construction area : 77,308.11 m2

Ground coverage area : 47.50 %


project

: Rs. 98.98 Cr

No. of Buildings : Rehab Buildings:

Building 1 to 4,6,7 (G + 7 floors) (construction completed)

Building 5(G +8 floors)

Sale Buildings :

Building 1 (Wing O and P)(G + 7 ) Completed,

Building 1 (Wing Q) ( G + 22)

Building 2 (B +ST + P + 8)

Height of building : 69. 00 m

Existing structure &

demolition

: All the existing structure on plot has been demolished

Chairman

79

Water Requirement : Total Water Requirement: 888 m3/day

Fresh Water: 576 m3/day

Recycled water : 312 m3/day

Rain water harvesting : RWH tank : 2 Capacity 50 cum

Rain water harvesting pits: 4 nos. with size 3.0 x 3.0 x 3.0m

Wastewater generated : 698 KLD

Capacity of STP : 750 KLD

STP technology: MBBR Technology

Solid Waste

Generation

: Biodegradable waste: 1.30 MT/day

Non biodegradable waste: 1.31 MT/day

STP Sludge (Dry sludge): 0.040 MT/day

Disposal : Biodegredable waste will be composted by the OWC.

Non biodegradable waste will be handed over to the authorized

recycler.

Dry STP sludge to be used as manure.

Energy : Source of power & supply capacity: 3400 KVA, Reliance Energy

DG set: 250 KVA x 3 Nos.

Energy Conservation : Use of CFL and T5 fluorescent tube with electronic chocks

Use of solar energy for street and landscape lightings

Small capacity transformers having low no load an load losses.

Use of energy efficient equipments e.g. BEE STAR RARED

Traffic Management : 4‐Wheeler : 245 No

Width of internal rods: 6.0 and 9.0 m

Green Belt

Development

: Total R.G area: 2867.93 Sq. m.

Inside the plot:‐ 125 No

Outside the plot:‐ 45 No

Environment

Management Plan

: Construction phase:

Capital Cost: 5 lakhs

O&M Cost: 1.10 lakhs / annum

Operation phase:

Capital Cost: 225 lakhs

O&M Cost: 180 lakhs / annum

Decision:




2. Submit a note on chronological details of the history of the plot with documentary

evidence and present status at the site

Chairman

80


270/2008- IA.III dated 7th February, 2012, for buildings with height greater than 60 m

the minimum width of the road (right of way) is 30 and the nearest fire station should be

located within distance of 2 km. In this case, the width of the road to as 18.5 m and the

height of the proposed sale building is more than 60 m. Therefore, the PP shall restrict

the height complying with the MoEF guidelines for High Rise Building.

4. Submit the consent for required water supply from competent authority.

5. Fire hydrant shall be provided wherever fire engine is inaccessible.

6. Submit independent EMP for rehab and sale alongwith appropriate corpus for rehab

building.

7. Trees to be planted inside (45 nos) the plot and outside (45 nos) the plot. Small trees and

shrubs (100 nos.) shall be provided on podium. Details of the same shall be submitted.

Chairman

81

Item No. 32

Subject: Environmental clearance for proposed Residential Cum Commercial project

“ROSA GARDENIA” at S.No.25/1,25/2,29/8 at Village Kasavadvali, Taluka -

Thane, Dist. - Thane by M/s. Sai Enterprises.




Name of the Project : Rosa Gardenia

Project Proponent : M/s. Sai Enterprises

Consultant : M/s. Enviro Analysts & Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Category : 8 (a), B2

Previous

consideration/s

: 46th SEAC meeting dated 20

th October, 2011

49th SEAC meeting dated 18-21 January,2012

Location of the

project

: S.No.25/1,25/2,29/8, At Village Kasavadvali, Taluka - Thane, Dist.-

Thane

Type of Project : Residential Cum Commercial

Plot Area : 19,430 m2

Ground Coverage : 35.87 %


up area

: • FSI: 25,564.82 m

2

• Non-FSI: 17,426.66 m2

• Total Construction area: 42,991.48 m2


project

: Rs. 140.00 Crores

No. of Buildings : Sr Description Details

1 No. of building 9 no.

2 No. of wings 2 no./Bldg

4 No. of floors Stilt + 16

5 No. of flats 496

6 No. of offices 1

7 No. of shops 32

8 Maternity hospital 01 Height of building Max height 56.56 m

Water Requirement Total water requirement = 409 KLD

Dry season:

• Fresh Water: 251KLD

• Recycled Water : 279 KLD

Chairman

82

• Excess treated water: 76 KLD

Wet season:

• Fresh Water: 251 KLD

• Recycled Water : 279 KLD Excess treated water: 102 KLD

Rain water

harvesting

• Percolation Pit Diameter : 1.5 M

• Depth: 6.00 M

• Fixed Depth: 2.40 M

• Total collection in RWH Tanks : 268 cum

Wastewater

generated

Sewage generation: 366 KLD, Technology: SAFF with R.O

Capacity of STP Capacity of STP: 5 STPs of total capacity of 378 KLD: The

wastewater generated from the proposed project will be treated by

sewage treatment plant and treated water will be recycled and used

for gardening & flushing requirement in the project. (Triple plumbing

the system)

Sewage holding tank of 658 KLD capacity which will store the 30%

RO reject (76 KLD during dry season) giving it a capacity of almost

7 - 8 days. After 7 - 8 days the RO reject from the holding tank will

be disposed off to the TMC sewer line along the Ghobunder Road.

Also the holding tank will serve as a sewage tank during the failure

or maintenance of the STP.

Solid Waste

Generation

• Total waste:1525.3 kg/day

• Organic waste: 924.2 Kg/day

• Non organic waste: 601.1 kg/day

• Bio-Medical Waste: 7.5 Kg/ day

• STP Sludge (Dry Sludge) : 78 Kg/day

Disposal • Organic waste will be sent to OWC for treatment and the manure

obtained after treatment will be used for gardening/landscaping.

• Inorganic waste will be handed over to the authorized recycler.

• The biomedical waste will be handed over to authorized agencies.

• Sewage sludge generated from the STP will be used as manure

for gardening.

Energy Energy requirement: 2.825 MW, Source: MSEB

DG Back up –

• DG sets with Acoustic enclosures for essential services

• For Tower A1 & A2 area only: 1 No. of 250 KVA

• For Common Area: 1 No. of 500 KVA

• For Hospital: 1 No. of 320 KVA

Energy

Conservation

Sr. Description Power

consumed

Power

consumed

Chairman

83

using

Conventional

method

(in kWh)

incorporatin

g energy

saving

methods

(in kWh)

1 External Lighting load 19958.40 13970.88

2 Lift load 1190246.40 833172.48

3 Pump load 324959.04 227471.33

4 Common area Load 157784.04 84151.49

5 Hospital Load 782992.80 417596.16

6 Solar Boiler for hot water 642816.00 214272.00

7 Total 3118756.68 1790634.34

8 Total Savings in power /

Annum (in Kwh)

1328122.34

9 Energy Consumed / Annum

in the absence of energy

savings method (in Kwh)

7432349.00

10 Total Energy Consumption /

Annum (in Kwh) with

energy saving method

6104226.00

11 Total savings in power

because of power saving

methods

42.58%

Traffic Management � 6 m Wide Internal Roads

� Parking Type: Stilt, Open spaces

� Total No. of Parking : 447 Cars, 550 Scooters

Green Belt

Development

400 shrubs and bushes on the elevated RG and 200 nos. of the large

and medium trees on the ground RG and along the boundary of the

plots

List of Trees

Sr Botanical Name Name

1 Caroyota Urens Fishtail Palm

2 Spathoda Campanulata Fountain Tree, Pichkari

Details Area in m2

Provided R.G. 5145.28

RG1 (Elevated) 3297.04

RG2 (Ground) (Paved RG) 669.19

RG3 (Ground) (Unpaved RG) 906.33

Total RG on ground 32.33 %

Chairman

84

3 Butea Monosperma Palas

4 Bombax Ceiba Katesvar

5 Cassia Fistula Bahawa

6 Tabebula Argentia Tabebuia

7 Alstonia Scholaris Satwin

List of shrubs

Sr Botanical Name Common Name

1 Melaleuca golden crest Golden bottle brush

2 Hibiscus rosea sinesis Hibiscus pink regular

3 Tabernaemontana coronaria

variegated

Variegated tagar

4 Ixora chinesis Chinese Ixora

5 Stachytarpheta Indica Stachytarpheta Red

6 Euphorbia leucocephala Polnsettla moutan snow

7 Belloperone gutta Shrimp plant red

8 Ficus Benjamin black Ficus black

9 Alpinia speclosa Alpinia yelow variegated

10 Euphorbia carcasana Euphorbia

11 Ficus benjamina Ficus prestige

12 Acalypha wikesiana Acalypha marble pink

13 Murraya exotica Kamini

14 Allamanda nerfolla Allamanda miniature

15 Ceasalpinia pulchirima Shankasur

16 Bougainvillea glabra Bougainvillea deep purple

17 Canna species (yellow) Canna dwarf yellow

18 Callandra emarginata Powder puff dwarf

19 Cassla biflora Cassla biflora

20 Ixora duffl red Ixora deep red

21 Lagerstormia indica Lagerstormia indica

22 Lantana camara Tantani

23 Eranthemum laxiflorum Tagar blue

24 Galphimia glauca Canara bush Environment

Management Plan


O & M Cost: 25.05 lakhs/annum

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. SEAC decided to

recommend the proposal for Environmental Clearance only after complying with following

conditions:

Chairman

85

1. As agreed during the presentation, PP shall undertake that he will not commission the

project until water supply and drainage facility are made available by TMC.

2. OC will be issued subject to condition that fresh water supply and drainage facility

connections are provided by TMC.

3. UGT for treated waste water shall be located away from fresh water UGTs.


planted (nos., size, age, species and locations) as per MoEF guidelines.

5. Revised drawings without RO system shall be submitted.

6. Submit original copies of all the letters issued by TMC regarding water supply and

drainage facility for verification.

Chairman

86

Item No. 33

Subject: Environmental clearance for proposed MMRDA Rental housing project

“Mahavir Square” located at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane by M/s. Square Feet

Builders.




Name of the Project : MMRDA Rental housing “Mahavir Square”

Project Proponent : M/s. Square Feet Builders.

Consultant M/s. Enviro Analysts & Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Location of the project : S. No. 59A/2A, 59A/16A/1/1 at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane.


Total Plot Area : 5767.00 m2

Proposed Total built up

area

: FSI area : Sale =16,739.44 m2, MMRDA = 5763.86 m

2

Non FSI area : Sale = 13,760.70 m2, MMRDA = 2790.26 m

2

Total construction area (FSI + Non FSI): 39,054.26 m2

Ground Coverage area 67.50 %


project

: 77 Crores

No. of Buildings : Sale Bldg : 1 No. constituting 2 wings (1B+St+1P+29 fl)

MMRDA : 1 No. ( Gr/St + 25 fl)

Height of Building : Sale Bldg : 91.35 m

MMRDA : 72.5 m

Total Water Requirement : Total water requirement: 379 KLD (Fresh Water: 162 KLD

from TMC)

Sewage Generation : 304 m3/day

STP capacity : Two STP 1 x 220KLD for Gray water and 1 x 95 KLD for

black water

Rain water Harvesting : 2 tanks of 74 m3 and 39 m

3, 7 percolation tanks.

Solid waste generation : Biodegradable waste: 680.65 Kg/day

Non biodegradable waste: 450.85 Kg/day

STP Sludge: 76 Kg/day

Solid waste management : Biodegradable waste will be handed over to local garbage

collecting vehicle of TMC for further treatment.

Green Belt Development RG area on ground: 434.44 m2 ( 7.5 % of the plot)

Elevated RG area: 984 m2.

Trees to be cut are 54 nos. & trees to be planted are 150 nos.

Chairman

87

Energy Requirement Source: MSEB, Maximum demand: 2.2 MW

1 x 630 KVA for sale building, 1 x 250 KVA for Residential

housing.

Traffic Management Four-wheelers: 382 nos.

Two wheelers: 225 nos.

Energy Conservation

measures

Use of CFL, T5 lamps.

Solar energy proposed.

Environmental

Management Plan


O & M cost: 20 lakhs /Y

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. PP has not

complied with most of the queries raised during the last meeting. It was noted that the major

concern of the Committee was tenement density and PP has not committed to reduce the same

close to 1000/ha during the presentation. This has constrained SEAC to recommend rejection of

the proposal.

Chairman

88

Item No. 34

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Cement Grinding Unit (2.0 MTPA)

with DG Set (12 MW), At Village: Tarsa, Ashti, Tehsil: Mauda, District: Nagpur

by M/s Ultratech Cement Ltd.

(File No.: SEAC 2011/CR956/TC2) (TOR case)



Name of the Project : Proposed Cement Grinding Unit (2.0 MTPA) with DG Set (12

MW), by M/s Ultratech Cement Ltd.

Category : 3(b) and 1(d) – B1

Project Proponent : M/s UltraTech Cement Ltd.

Consultant M/s J.M. EnviroNet Pvt. Ltd.

Location of the project : At Village: Tarsa, Ashti, Tehsil: Mauda, Dist: Nagpur

Latitude: 21° 15' 20.57"N- 21° 14' 38.99"N

Longitude: 79°22' 15.98"E- 79°22' 1.56"E

Elevation above Mean Sea Level: 279 m

Type of Project : Proposed Cement Grinding Unit (2.0 MTPA) with DG Set (12 MW)

Total Plot Area : 76.76 ha

Project cost : Project Cost:160 crore

Products : Cement = 2 MTPA

Raw materials : Clinker (4000-4450 TPD), Fly ash (1350-1850 TPD), Gypsum (300-

500TPD), Water

Water Requirement : 400KLD, Source: - River/Groundwater/ Industrial Area

(i) Process : 35 KLD

(ii) Cooling water : 130 KLD, for D.G. Set :150 KLD

(iii) DM Water: Nil

(iv) Dust Suppression: 20KLD

(v) Drinking: 10 KLD

(vi) Green belt : 35 KLD

(vii) Fire service : Nil

(viii) Others: 20KLD

Effluent Generation : Clinker Grinding is based on dry process technology so total water

will be recycled and reused as a result effluent will not be generated.

Domestic Effluent: Quantity & Disposal: 8KLD will be treated

through soak pit via septic tank

Solid waste management : No domestic solid waste will be generated. Small quantity of

commercial waste generated will be recycled through authorized

Chairman

89

dealers.

Air Pollution Control : 1 Bag House and 14 Bag Filters will be installed to control emissions.

Green Belt Development : Green belt area : 25.33 ha

Area will be covered at the rate of 1000 trees per hectare, with 20

m thickness around the plant boundary.

Existing plantation - Nil

Proposed no. of plant species = 25,000 trees

Number trees being cut/replanted or compensated- Nil

Energy Requirement : Total Power Requirement (MW); 12 MW

Source of Power: D.G. Sets / State Grid Supply

Environmental

Management Plan

: Capital Cost of environmental protection measures =Rs. 80 Lac Recurring cost: 6 lac/annum

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. PP requested

to treat the project as B2 and submitted documents showing other such projects treated as B2

by MoEF.SEAC deliberated the issue and noted that proposed total land is not in possession

of PP and some portion of it is under agriculture use.Considering this ,the project proponent

has been advised to carry out the EIA study considering the various comments ( viz.

conversion to landuse pattern to non-agricultural (NA) purpose, satellite imagaery, drawal of

water etc.) made by the committee and the model TORs prescribed both for Cement and

Power Plant (Page No 104 & 119 ) and Public consultation as per MoEF guideline. A QCI

accredited consultant and MOEF/NABL accredited lab shall be used for the preparation of

EIA Report.

Chairman

90

Item No. 35

Subject: Environmental clearance for the expansion of industrial project [Expansion of

power plant] at plot No. E 1, E 2, E 3 MIDC Waluj, Aurangabad by M/s. Sterlite

Technologies Limited

(File No.: SEAC 2011/CR895/TC2) (TOR case)



Name of the Project : M/s. Sterlite Technologies Limited

Category : 1(d) – B1

Project Proponent : M/s. Sterlite Technologies Limited

Consultant M/s SMS Envocare ltd

Location of the project : Plot No. E 1, E 2, E 3 MIDC Waluj, Aurangabad

Latitude : 190 50’ 24.57” N

Longitude : 750 13’ 46.27” E

Elevation above Mean Sea Level : 513 m

Type of Project : Expansion of power plant - Power generation on Furnace Oil based

Total Plot Area : Total plot area: 34788 m2

Built up: 22978 m2

Project cost : 9.19 Cr (Expansion)

Products : Existing 6 MW Captive Power Plant Expansion by 7.88 MW (6 +

7.88) Captive Power plant, Total Capacity = 13.88 MW Power

generation on Furnace Oil based

Raw materials : Furnace Oil (Liquid) = 2000 MT/Month

HSD (Liquid) = 6 MT/Month

Lube Oil (Liquid) = 8.5 MT/Month

Boiler Chemical (Solid) = 350 KG/Month

Cooling Tower Chemical (Solid) = 350 KG/Month

Water Requirement : Source: MIDC water Supply

Total Water Requirement After Expansion : 91 CMD

(i) Process : Nil

(ii) Cooling water : 55 CMD (Existing 20 + Proposed 35 CMD)

(iii) Drinking : 1 CMD (Existing 0.2 CMD + Proposed 0.8 CMD)

(iv) Green belt : 20 CMD

(v) Fire service: - Make up

(vi) Boiler : 15 CMD (Existing 15 CMD + Proposed Nil )

Effluent Generation : Total Effluent generation : 7.8 CMD

Domestic Effluent = 0.3 CMD

Chairman

91

Trade Effluent: 7.5 CMD

ETP / STP capacity : Capacity of ETP: Existing ETP -55 CMD

Rain water Harvesting : Proposed

Storm Water Drainage : Storm water drains will be constructed. Storm water from the entire

plot will be collected through network of storm drains. Storm water

from plot area will be collected in the rainwater harvesting pits

provided for this purpose. The overflow from these pits, if any, will

be then discharged in the nalla.

Solid waste management : No solid wastes are generated during the operation phase. The liquid

waste generated during the operation phase is Spent Oil (EXISTING

-100 KG/Day) (Proposed - 660 KG/Day) Total = 760 KG/Day – will

be sent to authorized Reprocessor

Air Pollution Control : The pollutants envisaged from the project activity are Suspended

Particulate Matter (SPM), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), Carbon mono-

oxide (CO) and CO2. Scrubber (existing) installed.

Green Belt Development : Green belt area : 33% will be provided

Area in Sq. meter- 11810 m2

Energy Requirement : DG Sets: 1No, Capacity :- 200 KVA

Environmental

Management Plan

: Cost of environmental protection measures = Rs. 86.5 Lakhs

Recurring Cost = Rs. 12 Lakhs / Yr

Decision:

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. The project

proponent has been advised to carry out the EIA study considering the various comments made

by the committee and the model TOR prescribed (Page No 119) and then approach the

committee for the appraisal. A QCI accredited consultant and MOEF/NABL accredited lab shall

be used for the preparation of EIA Report.

Chairman

92

Item No. 36

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Sponge iron 180 TPD, 30 MW power

plant, MS Billets Mini Steel plant 525 TPD and Re-Rolling Mill 500 TPD at Mul

MIDC area, Chandrapur Dist by Rajuri steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd.




Name of the Project : Sponge iron 180 TPD, Power plant 30 MW, Billet plant 525 TPD and

Re rolling mill 500 TPD

Project Proponent : M/s. Rajuri steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd.

Consultant M/s. Pollution and Ecology control services, Nagpur

Category 3 (a) and 1(d), B1

Previous

consideration/s


held on 17th April, 2010

Location Plot No. B-6, 7, and 8 MIDC, Mul, District Chandrapur.

Plant Metallurgical industry and power plant

Products Sponge iron: 180 TPD

M.S. Billet plant: 525 TPD

Re rolling mill: 500 TPD

Power plant: 30 MW

Raw material Sponge iron plant:

Iron ore: 288 TPD

Coal: 216 TPD

Dolomite: 1.8 TPD

CPP:

Coal: 374 TPD

Char: 49 TPD by product

Rolling Mill: Coal in Gasifier: 45TPD

Total plot area 24 ha.


project

Rs. 15,775 Lakhs.

Total water

requirement

Total water requirement: 210 m3/day, Source: MIDC

Sponge iron plant: 50 m3/day

Captive power plant: 100 m3/day

MS Billets: 40 m3/day

Domestic: 20 m3/day

Chairman

93

Waste water

generation

110 m3/day

Green belt area 30 % of the plot area

Power generation 30 MW


measures

Sponge iron: bag filters / ESP

Captive power plant: ESP

M.S.Billets: Ventury scrubbers

Rolling mill: bag filters and ecupraetors

Dry fog type dust suppression system to control the secondary

fugitive emission.


measures

• M/S RSAPL shall provide dust suction system which will

control fugitive emission due to raw material handling.

• Dust suppression system will be provided in the form of water

sprinklers. All vibrating screens and weigh feeders below the

hopper, day bins etc are totally covered to prevent leakages of

dust. All bins are totally packed and covered so that there is

no chance of dust leakage. All material transfer points are

connected with dust suppression water nozzles to avoid air

pollution. From Sponge iron plant fugitive emission will be

envisaged due to accumulation of ash on finished product

surface.

• Ventury scrubbers will be provided for the extraction of dust

particles. The continuous casting operation is selected for the

production of billets in induction furnace.

Water pollution

control measures

• The waste water generated from the proposed power plant

with captive power plant will be suitably treated in effluent

treatment plant. The effluent generation mostly from captive

power plant consists of cooling tower down boiler blow

down, service water and sanitary waste. Effluent from the DM

plant will be neutralized.

• The treated effluent will be recycled to rolling mill as make

up water for cooling and the remaining will be used in the ash

pond, dust suppression and green belt development.

• Treated waste water will be recycled 100 %. No waste water

will discharged outside the plant boundary.

Noise pollution

control measures

• Providing padding at various locations to avoid sharp noise

due to vibration.

• Encasement of noise generating equipment where otherwise

noise cannot be controlled

• Providing noise proof cabins to operators where remote

control for operating noise generating equipment is feasible.

• In all the design/installation precautions are taken as specified

Chairman

94

by the manufacturers with respect to noise control will be

strictly adhered to; High noise generating sources will be

insulated adequately by providing suitable enclosures;

• Use of lagging with attenuation properties on plant

components / installation of sound attenuation panels around

the equipment

• Other than the regular maintenance of the various equipment,

ear plugs/muffs are recommended for the personnel working

close to the noise generating units;

• All the openings like covers, partitions will be designed

properly

• Inlet and outlet mufflers will be provided which are easy to

design and construct.

• All rotating items will be well lubricated and provided with

enclosures as far as possible to reduce noise transmission.

Extensive vibration monitoring system will be provided to

check and reduce vibrations. Vibration isolators will be

provided.

Solid waste

management

• Char: 49 TPD will be utilized Fluidized Bed Combustion

Boilers after washing.

• Fly Ash 127 TPD; 100% shall be used in the brick unit.

Temporary storage of unused ash in ash pond.

Decision :


submitted the report on flora & fauna and CSR during the presentation.As SEAC needed some

time to go through the documents it is decided to consider the case in next meeting.

Chairman

95

Item No. 37

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Pharma SEZ at village Krushnoor,

District Nanded M/s Parsvnath MIDC Pharma SEZ Pvt Ltd.




Name of the Project : Proposd pharma SEZ at village Krushnoor, Dist Nanded

Project Proponent : M/s Parsvnath MIDC Pharma SEZ Pvt Ltd.

Consultant : M/s Voyents Solution Ltd

Category : 7(c) 7 (d) B1

Location of the

project

: village Krushnoor, Hyderabad Road, adjacent to State Highway

MSH-3, Nanded hydrabad state highway, Dist Nanded

Type of Project : Area development - Pharma SEZ

Total Area : 150 Hectors


project

: Rs. 52.44 Cr

Water Requirement : Total Water Requirement: 8.11 MLD

Processing area: 6.55 MLD

Non processing area: 1.56 MLD

Rain water harvesting : 80 nos. of recharge pits are proposed.

Sewage and waste

water

: • MLD of domestic water will be treated in STP (SAFF

Technology).

• 3.46 MLD of trade effluent will be treated in CETP.

• Treated water from STP and CETP will be used for gardening and

cooling.

Solid Waste

Generation

: • Spent oil will be sent to the authorized recyclers.

• Sludge from CETP will be sent to the authorized recycler.

Energy : 85.26 MVA

Green Belt

Development

: • RG on the ground: 1,29,150 Sq.m

• Existing trees: 50 nos. and 150 nos. of trees will be replanted or

compensated.

Environment

Management Plan

: Capital Cost: 1595 lakhs

O&M Cost: 175lakhs / annum

Decision:

Chairman

96

The case was discussed on the basis of the presentation made by the proponent. SEAC noted

letter submitted by PP dated 30.03.2012 having provision of Captive Power Plant and CETP

during the area development. However, during presentation, PP clarified that no Captive Power

Plant is proposed and only CETP is proposed during the area development. In view of this SEAC

decided that the project will be appraised under the Category No. 7(C) [i.e SEZ] and

7(d)[i.e.CETP].


1. Submit undertaking regarding withdrawal of Captive Power Plant from the proposed area

development and submit revised Forms accordingly.

2. Carry out the EIA study considering the various comments made by the committee and the

model TORs prescribed both for SEZ and CETP (Page No136 & 111) and then approach the

committee for the appraisal. A QCI accredited consultant and MOEF/NABL accredited lab

shall be used for the preparation of EIA Report.

3. It is not clear whether the project site falls in a notified industrial area.This may be clarified

with necessary documents. If it be outside notified industrial area, then public consultation

will be necessary.

4. The layout of the plots has been done without considering the very undulating topography of

the site and needs to be modified.

5. PP needs to do indivisual plot development so that all necessary infrastructures like surface

run-off drains, internal roads, STP and sewerage etc. are provided in the proposed scheme.

6. Details as to how the capacity of CETP,STP,etc. are worked out be furnished.

Chairman

97

Item No. 38

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Adegaon Dolomite and Limestone

Mine (35.87 Ha), Tehsil Zarijamni, District Yavatmal by M/s. Linkson Coals &

Minerals Pvt. Ltd


The project proponent was absent.

Chairman

98

Item No. 39

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed expansion of sugar unit from 5,000 TCD

to 8,000 TCD along with cogeneration unit of 18.585 MW at Mahatma Phule Nagar,

village Bijwadi Tal-Indapur, Dist-Pune by M/s. Karmayogi Shankarraoji Patil

Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited

(File No.: SEAC2012/CR 001/TC2) (Compliance case)



Name of the Project : Expansion of sugar unit from 5,000 TCD to 8,000 TCD along with

cogeneration unit of 18.585 MW.

Category : 5(J) and 1(d), B1

Project Proponent : M/s. Karmayogi Shankarraoji Patil Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana

Limited

Consultant M/s. Vasantdada Sugar Institute, Pune

Location of the project : Mahatma Phule Nagar, village Bijwadi Tal-Indapur

Type of Project : Sugar unit along with cogeneration plant.

Total Plot Area : 18 Acres built up area, 6 acres provided for green belt development


project

: Rs. 12103.48 lakhs

Products : Name of

Products,

Byproducts

Existing Proposed activity

(new/

modernization/e

xpansion)

Total

A. Main

Products

White Sugar:

467 MT/Day

White Sugar:

920 MT/Day

Power: (18.585

MW electricity)

White Sugar

920 MT/Day,

18.585 MW

Electricity

B. By-

Products

Molasses : 163

MT/Day

Bagasse : 1300

MT/Day

Press mud:

173MT / Day

Molasses : 320

MT/Day

Bagasse : 2240

MT/Day

Press mud: 320

MT / Day

Molasses :

320MT/Day

Bagasse :

2240MT/Day

Press mud:

320MT/Day

Chairman

99

Raw material Sugar Cane: 8,000 MT/Day

Lime : 9.8MT/Day

Sulfur: 4.64 MT/Day

Bagasse (Fuel): 106.875 TPH ( 76,950TPM)

Water Requirement : Total Water Requirement: 2835 m3/day

Recycled water: 1975 m3/day

Power Generation : Total Power Requirement (MW): 10.925( Sugar Factory, ETP,

Office, Colony, Workshop, Other)

Solid waste

management

Raw water Treatment Plant: 3.0 TPM; Land filling in own

gardening area

ETP: 85 TPM; Utilized for composting along with press mud

Process Ash: 1014 TPM; Utilized for composting along with press

mud

Effluent Generation Total Effluent generation: 856 m3/day,

Effluent treated in ETP of 1,700 m3/day ; will be used for irrigation

purpose.

Pollution control

measures

Aspect Existing Proposed

Air Mechanical Dust

collector Wet scrubber

Water Effluent Treatment

Plant

Existing ETP at sugar factory is

of 1700m3 which is adequate to

treat the additional effluent

from cogeneration unit.

Noise Regular

maintenance of

machinery and

greenbelt

Boiler and power house in

closed area

Greenbelt development for

proposed unit

Solid

Waste

Bio-compost unit Adequate for disposal of

additional ash

due to cogeneration unit Green belt area Green belt area: 24281.13 Sq. m

Existing nos. of trees: 10,000 nos.

Proposed nos. of trees with plant species: 5,000 nos.

Environmental

Management Plan

: Capital cost: 450 Crores

Recurring cost: Rs. 17 Lakhs

Decision:


project proponent submitted Minutes of the Public hearing and EIA report. SEAC decided to

recommend the proposal for Environmental Clearance only after complying with following

conditions:

Chairman

100



2. Submit detailed note on RWH.

3. Submit detailed note on ETP along with effluent characteristics.

4. The project proponent shall draw up a sustainable model with appropriate EMP, as the

proposed EMP (O&M) is inadequate.

Chairman

101

Item No. 40

Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed residential building at land bearing Sr.

No. 127/175, Waked Chinchwad road, waked Mulshi, Pune by M/s. Manav

Promoters Pvt. Ltd. (New case)

SEAC noted that the PP has not furnished the projects details. The proponent is directed to

comply with the following preliminary observations:

1. Submit plot history and chronological developmental details of Phase I, II and III.

2. Submit site photographs from different corners of the plot for poposed phase.

3. Dimensioned Master plan layout explaining the STPs, RWH, storage water tank for the

fire fighting etc. should be submitted

4. Submit the consent for drainage facility and additional required water supply from

competent authority.

5. Submit copy of Conveyance Deed.



7. Non FSI area on account of covered parking is catering only to Phase-II. Ensure that it is

not loaded to Phase-III.

Comprehensive assessment will be done after studying the proposal.

Chairman

102

Item No. 41

Subject: Environmental clearance for the proposed Residential Project on plot bearing

S.No.112,112/1 to 4,113/1, 113/2,114 to 118,118/1 to 5,119,119/1 to 11 of village

Goregaon(West), Mumbai by M/s.Skystar Buildcon Private Limited (New Case)

SEAC noted that the PP has not furnished the projects details The proponent is directed to


1. Ground Coverage is very high (76%).

2. Per car parking area is very high.

3. Consent for drainage facility and required water supply from competent authority was

not available.

4. Non FSI-area is very high.

5. No confirmation that PP has fully adopted new DCR.

6. Details of RG on groundand podium not available.

7. RG area ground seems to be inadequate.


Chairman

103

Item No. 42

Subject: Environmental clearance for the Proposed residential project at Undri, Pune by

M/s. Nyati Builders Pvt Ltd (New Case)

SEAC noted that the PP has not furnished the projects details The proponent is directed to


1. PP informed that he has formed a joint venture with other party and accordingly name of

the project is changed. Undertaking regarding the same is not submitted.

2. Location of the plot is beyond PMC limits, therefore amenities like water supply and

drainage facilities are not available. PP has not clarified the status and postion of the

same.

3. As the plot has many steep areas, cutting into steep slopes for development of plot is not

advisable. Such steep area can be conveniently used for development of green spots. The

nayout needs to be accordingly modified.

4. Detailed layout map showing storm water outfall was not available.

5. The ground coverage calculation needs revision by eliminating the amenity area to be

handed over.


Chairman

104

Term of Reference

TOR for Cement Industry

For the limestone mine captive to cement plants, separate ToRs specified for cement and as well as mining

are required to be considered. ToR for EIA studies for cement plants may include, but not limited to the

following:

1 Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal, use of

resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a compilation of EIA report, including EMP

and the post-project monitoring plan in brief.

Project description:

2 Justification for selecting the proposed product and unit size.

3 Land requirement for the project including its break up for various purposes, its availability and

optimization.

4 Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating various units/industries within the plant.

5 Complete process flow diagram describing each unit, its processes and operations, along with

material and energy inputs and outputs (material and energy balance).

6 Details of proposed source-specific pollution control schemes and equipments to meet the national

standards.

7 Details on requirement of raw materials, its source and storage at the plant.

8 Details on locating the residential colonies on upwind direction.

9 Details of the proposed methods of water conservation and recharging.

10 Management plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal.

11 In case, hazardous waste is proposed to be charged in kilns, details on type of waste, its

characteristics and monitoring of emissions of gases, heavy metals, VOCs, dioxins and furans.

12 Scheme of proper storage of fly ash, gypsum, clinker.

13 Analysis report of Sulphur content in fuels and Sulphur balance data.

14 Details of heat and noise emission sources from the proposed project and proposed measures.

15 Details of CO2 emissions including its quantum per tonne of cement.

16 Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel storage, restroom, etc. to the workers

during construction and operation phase.

Chairman

105

17 In case of expansion of existing industries, remediation measures adopted to restore the

environmental quality if the groundwater, soil, crop, air, etc., are affected and a detailed compliance

to the prior environmental clearance/consent conditions.

18 Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any

Court of Law related to the environmental pollution and impacts in the last two years,

if so, details thereof.

Description of the environment:

19 The study area shall be up to a distance of 10 km from the boundary of the proposed project site.

20 Location of the project site and nearest habitats with distances from the project site to be demarcated

on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).

21 Land-use based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such as national parks /

wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries, etc. for the study area.

22 Demography details of all the villages falling within the study area.

23 Topography details of the project area.

24 The baseline data to be collected from the study area w.r.t. different components of environment viz.

air, noise, water, land, and biology and socio-economic.

25 Details of geological features of the study area and mine area. Hydrological regime plan shall be

prepared and incorporated. Interception of mining with the groundwater, if any.

26 Surface water quality of nearby water sources and other surface drains.

27 Details on ground water quality.

28 Details on existing ambient air quality and expected, stack and fugitive emissions for PM10, PM 2.5,

SO2* and other sulphur compounds, NOx* and other nitrogen compounds, carbon oxides (CO and

CO2) etc., and evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed pollution control devices to meet standards

for point sources and to meet AAQ standards. (* - As applicable)

29 Details on other pollutants also to be considered in relation to the production of cement, especially

with secondary fuels are VOC, polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDDs and

PCDFs), metals and their compounds, Hydrogen Fluoride, Hydrochloric Acid (HCl), etc.

30 The air quality contours may be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site,

habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any and wind roses.

31 Chemical characterization of RSPM data.

32 Details on baseline data on silicosis in buffer and core zone.

33 Details on noise levels at sensitive/commercial receptors.

34 Site-specific micro-meteorological data including mixing height.

35 One season site-specific data excluding monsoon season.

36 Proposed baseline monitoring network for the consideration and approval of the Competent

Chairman

106

Authority.

37 Ecological status (terrestrial and aquatic) of the study area such as habitat type and quality, species,

diversity, rarity, fragmentation, ecological linkage, age, abundance, etc.

If any incompatible land-use attributes fall within the project area, proponent shall describe the

sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance

for review and acceptance by the SEAC. Incompatible land-use attributes include:

a. Public water supply areas from rivers/surface water bodies, from ground water

b. Scenic areas/tourism areas/hill resorts

c. Religious places, pilgrim centers that attract over 10 lakh pilgrims a year

d. Protected tribal settlements (notified tribal areas where industrial activity is not permitted)

e. CRZ

f. Monuments of national significance, World Heritage Sites

g. Cyclone, Tsunami-prone areas (based on last 25 years)

h. Airport areas

i. Any other feature as specified by the State or local government and other features as locally

applicable, including prime agricultural lands, pastures, migratory corridors, etc.

If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within the project area, proponent shall describe the sensitivity

(distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance for review

and acceptance by the SEAC. Ecological sensitive attributes include:

a. National parks

b. Wild life sanctuaries, Game reserve

c. Tiger reserve/elephant reserve/turtle nesting ground

d. Mangrove area

e. Wetlands

f. Reserved and Protected forests, etc.

39

g. Any other closed/protected area under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, any other area

locally applicable

40 If the location falls in a valley, studies on specific issues connected to the natural resources

management.

41 Identification of CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies

demarcating LTL(Low Tide Level), HTL (High Tide Level), CRZ area, location of the project and

associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any. The route of the pipeline,

etc., passing through CRZ, if any, should also be demarcated. Recommendations of the State Coastal

Management Authority for the activities to be taken up in the CRZ.

– Provide the CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for specific

observations.

– Proposed site for disposal of dredged material and environmental quality at the point of

Chairman

107

disposal/impact areas.

– Fisheries study should be done w.r.t. Benthos and Marine organic material and coastal fisheries.

Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures :

42 Anticipated generic environmental impacts due to this project may be evaluated for significance and

based on corresponding likely impacts Valued Environmental Components (VECs) may be

identified. Baseline studies may be conducted for all the concerned VECs and likely impacts will

have to be assessed for their magnitude in order to identify mitigation measures.

43 Impact prediction tools used for the appropriate assessment of environmental impacts .

While identifying the likely impacts, also include the following for analysis of significance and

required mitigation measures:

a impacts due to transportation of raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment

b impacts on surface water, soil and groundwater

c impacts due to air pollution

d impacts due to odour pollution

e impacts due to noise

f impacts due to fugitive emissions

44

g impact on health of workers due to proposed project activities

45 Proposed odour control measures

46 Action plan for the greenbelt development – species, width of plantations, planning schedule, etc., in

accordance to CPCB published guidelines.

47 In case of likely impact from the proposed project on the surrounding reserve forests, Plan for the

conservation of wild fauna in consultation with the State Forest Department.

48 Mitigation measures - for source control and treatment.

49 Air quality modeling for the cement plant should be incorporated. Air pollution control system to be

installed should be elaborated upon to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.

50 Details on rainwater harvesting at the cement plant site.

Analysis of alternative resources and technologies:

51 Comparison of alternate sites considered and the reasons for selecting the proposed site. Conformity

of the site with the prescribed guidelines in terms of CRZ, river, highways, railways, etc.

52 Details on improved technologies.

Environmental monitoring program:

Chairman

108

53 Specific programme to monitor Nickel and Vanadium emissions be included, incase of use of pet-

coke.

54 An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions as per the CPCB guidelines.

55 Monitoring programme for pollution control at source

56 Monitoring pollutants at receiving environment for the appropriate notified parameters – air quality,

groundwater, surface water, gas quality, etc. during operational phase of the project.

57 Specific programme to monitor safety and health protection of workers

58 Appropriate monitoring network has to be designed and proposed, to assess the possible residual

impacts on VECs.

59 Details of in-house monitoring capabilities and the recognized agencies if proposed for conducting

monitoring.

Additional studies:

60 Clearances/approvals from the IBM and State government for the linked mining component.

61 Details on risk assessment and damage control during different phases of the project and proposed

safeguard measures.

62 Details on socio-economic development activities such as commercial property values, generation of

jobs, education, social conflicts, cultural status, accidents, etc.

63 Proposed plan to handle the socio-economic influence on the local community. The plan should

include quantitative dimension as far as possible.

64 Details on compensation package for the people affected by the project, considering the socio-

economic status of the area, homestead oustees, land oustees, and landless labourers.

65 Points identified in the public hearing and commitment of the project proponent to the same. Detailed

action plan addressing the issues raised, and the details of necessary allocation of funds.

66 Administrative and technical organizational structure to ensure proposed post-project monitoring

programme for approved mitigation measures..

67 EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along

with item-wise cost of its implementation (Capital and recurring costs).

68 Allocation of resources and responsibilities for plan implementation.

69 Details of the emergency preparedness plan and on-site and off-site disaster management plan.

Above points shall be adequately addressed in the EIA report at corresponding chapters, in addition

to the contents given in the reporting structure as below:

Sr. EIA Structure Contents

1 Introduction Purpose of the report

Chairman

109

Identification of project & project proponent

Brief description of nature, size, location of the project and its

importance to the country, region

Scope of the study – details of regulatory scoping carried out

Condensed description of those aspects of the project (based on

project feasibility study), likely to cause environmental effects.

Details should be provided to give clear picture of the following:

Type of project

Need for the project

Location (maps showing general location, specific location,

project boundary & project site layout)

Size or magnitude of operation (incl. Associated activities

required by / for the project)

Proposed schedule for approval and implementation

Technology and process description

Project description including drawings showing project layout,

components of project etc. Schematic representations of

feasibility drawings which give information important for EIA

purpose

Description of mitigation measures incorporated into the project

to meet environmental standards, environmental operating

conditions, or other EIA requirements (as required by the scope)

2 Project Description

Assessment of New & untested technology for the risk of

technological failure

Study area, period, components & methodology

Establishment of baseline for VECs, as identified in the scope

3 Description of the

Environment

Base maps of all environmental components

Details of Investigated Environmental impacts due to project

location, possible accidents, project design, project construction,

regular operations, final decommissioning or rehabilitation of a

completed project

Measures for minimizing and / or offsetting adverse impacts

identified

Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of environmental

components

4 Anticipated

Environmental

Impacts & Mitigation

Measures

Assessment of significance of impacts (Criteria for determining

significance, Assigning significance)

Chairman

110

Mitigation measures

Incase, the scoping exercise results in need for alternatives:

Description of each alternative

Summary of adverse impacts of each alternative

5 Analysis of

Alternatives

(Technology & Site)

Mitigation measures proposed for each alternative and selection

of alternative

6 Environmental

Monitoring Program

Technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation

measures (incl. measurement methodologies, frequency, location,

data analysis, reporting schedules, emergency procedures,

detailed budget & procurement schedules)

Public consultation

Risk assessment

7 Additional Studies

Social impact assessment, R&R action plans

Improvements in physical infrastructure

Improvements in social infrastructure

Employment potential –skilled; semi-skilled and unskilled

8 Project Benefits

Other tangible benefits

9 Environmental Cost

Benefit Analysis

If recommended at the scoping stage

10 EMP Description of the administrative aspects that ensures proper

implementation of mitigative measures and their effectiveness

monitored, after approval of the EIA

Overall justification for implementation of the project

11 Summary &

Conclusion (This

will constitute the

summary of the EIA

Report) Explanation of how, adverse effects have been mitigated

12 Disclosure of

Consultants engaged

Names of the Consultants engaged with their brief resume

and nature of Consultancy rendered

Chairman

111

TOR for Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP)

ToR for EIA studies in respect of proposed CETP may include, but not limited to the following:

1 Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal, use of

resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a compilation of EIA report, including EMP

and the post-project monitoring plan in brief.


2 Justification for selecting the proposed product and unit size.

3 Land requirement for the project including its break up for various purposes, its availability and

optimization.

4 Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating various units/industries within the plant.

5 Complete process flow diagram describing each unit, its processes and operations, along with

material and energy inputs and outputs (material and energy balance).

6 Details of the industries for which CETP facility is proposed including raw materials used and

products manufactured.

7 Expected quantity of wastewater from each industry and justification for selecting the proposed

capacity of the treatment plant/modules.

8 Characteristics of effluent and proposed segregation of streams, if any, from individual member

industries.

9 Details of mode of effluent collection system either by tankers and/or pipeline, etc., or proposed

trouble-shooting mechanism.

10 Monitoring protocol in case of collection of effluent through pipeline and/or tankers.

11 Details on physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the combined effluent and its

concentrations and the basis for the same.

12 Details of equalization tank at least for 24 hrs; and guard ponds for holding treated wastewater or

continuous monitoring facilities, if any.

13 Details of the proposed treatment schemes supported by the treatability studies including source

separation of streams for specific mode of collection and treatment either at individual industry or at

CETP (based on economic and operational ease considerations).

14 Built-in flexibility provisions to deal with quantitative and qualitative fluctuations.

Chairman

112

15 Organizational setup for collection of pretreated effluents, treatment and disposal of the treated

effluents, etc. and deployment of qualified/skilled man power.

16 Details of O&M for maximum utilization of the designed capacity of the plant.

17 Proposed monitoring protocol for stage-wise quality control w.r.t. various characteristics and

maintenance schedules followed for all rotating equipment including lubricating/oil fill, operational

chemicals and laboratory chemicals.

18 For any sensitive environmental parameters such as heavy metals, fluorides, etc., details on improved

material of construction of tanks and other equipments such as corrosion resistance, allowance, etc.

19 Details of power consumption and stand-by arrangements like the diesel generator (DG) sets, dual

fuel (gas and oil) for uninterrupted operation of treatment plant.

20 Protocol and mechanism to accept the effluent by tankers only during day time, including the

adequacy of the receiving/holding tanks, etc.

21 Impact of the project on local infrastructure of the study area such as road network, etc. If the study

area requires any additional infrastructure, details of the agency responsible for the same should be

included along with the time frame. Details of the permission from the competent Authority for

conveyor belt crossing the village road.

22 If the ultimate disposal is through a marine outfall then preliminary design of the outfall with

estimated initial dilution.

23 Details of laboratory, workshop, database, library, waste exchange centers, etc. in CETP.

24 Availability of the land for proposed treatment for ultimate capacity and to accommodate required

greenbelt development.



27 Detailed plan of treated wastewater disposal/ reuse/ utilization / management.

28 Detailed plan of treated wastewater disposal/ reuse/ utilization / management.

29 In case of expansion of existing industries, remediation measures adopted to restore the

environmental quality if the groundwater, soil, crop, air, etc., are affected and a detailed compliance

to the prior environmental clearance/consent conditions.

30 Details on equity by the member industries/non refundable membership fee to ensure continuity of

membership and financial model, etc.

31 Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of Law

related to the environmental pollution and impacts in the last two years, if so, details thereof.


32 The study area shall be up to a distance of 5 km from the boundary of the proposed site and all along

the collection network/route map of tanker movement, treated wastewater carrying pipe-line and the

Chairman

113

receiving environment at the point of disposal.



34 Land-use based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such as national parks /






38 Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the study area.



41 Details on water quality parameters such as pH, Temperature (oC), Oil and grease, Cyanide* (as CN),

Ammoniacal nitrogen* (as N), Phenolic compounds* (as C6H5OH), Hexavalent Chromium*, Total

chromium*, Copper*, Nickel*, Lead*, Arsenic*, Mercury*, Cadmium*, Selenium*, Fluoride*,

Boron*, Radioactive materials*, Alfa emitters*, Hc/ml,Beta emitters*, Hc/ml*, etc. (* - as

applicable).

42 Details on existing ambient air quality and expected, stack and fugitive emissions for PM10, PM2.5,

SO2*, NOx*, VOCs*, carbon oxides (CO and CO2) etc., and evaluation of the adequacy of the

proposed pollution control devices to meet standards for point sources and to meet AAQ standards. (*

- As applicable)







Authority.



If any incompatible land-use attributes fall within a 5 km radius of the project boundary, proponent

shall describe the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based

on significance for review and acceptance by the EAC/SEAC. Incompatible land-use attributes

include:

Public water supply areas from rivers/surface water bodies, from ground water


49


Chairman

114


e. CRZ

f. Monuments of national significance, World Heritage Sites

g. Cyclone, Tsunami-prone areas (based on last 25 years)

h. Airport areas

i. Any other feature as specified by the State or local government and other features as locally


If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within a 5 km radius of the project boundary, proponent shall

describe the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on

significance for review and acceptance by the SEAC. Ecological sensitive attributes include:

a. National parks

b. Wild life sanctuaries, Game reserve


d. Mangrove area

e. Wetlands


50


locally applicable

51 If the location falls in a valley, studies on specific issues connected to the natural resources

management.

52 Identification of CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies

demarcating LTL(Low Tide Level), HTL (High Tide Level), CRZ area, location of the project and

associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any. The route of the pipeline,

etc., passing through CRZ, if any, should also be demarcated. Recommendations of the State Coastal

Management Authority for the activities to be taken up in the CRZ.

53 CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for specific observations.

54 Environmental parameters – Temperature, sea level pressure, wind speed, mean relative humidity,

visibility, salinity, density, rainfall, fog, frequency and intensity of cyclones, sediment transport,

seismic characteristics, fresh water influx.

55 Details on marine biological parameters – microbiological population, pathogenic bacteria, plankton

distribution, fish spawning grounds in the adjoining waters, commercial fisheries potential,

vegetation including inter tidal, flora and fauna in the marine, benthal quality assessment for

biological species and heavy metals and estuarine environment.



Chairman

115

based on corresponding likely impacts Valued Environmental Components (VECs) may be

identified. Baseline studies may be conducted for all the concerned VECs and likely impacts will

have to be assessed for their magnitude in order to identify mitigation measures.

57 Impact prediction tools used for the appropriate assessment of environmental impacts .



a impacts due to transportation of raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment

b impacts on surface water, soil and groundwater

c impacts due to air pollution

d impacts due to odour pollution

e impacts due to noise

F impacts due to fugitive emissions

g impact on health of workers due to proposed project activities

58

h impact on the disposal mode-specific receiving environment


60 Action plan for the greenbelt development – species, width of plantations, planning schedule, etc., in




62 Mitigation measures - for source control and treatment.

63 Details in case, if the effluent conveyance system uses pipe lines, details regarding minimum (one

day) storage tank with mixing facility to keep it in aerobic conditions at source industry and

mechanism to ensure compliance with prescribed standards at this storage tank.

64 Details regarding soil and groundwater impacts and regular monitoring protocols suggested for

ensuring no significant impacts, besides preventive measures.

65 Impacts due to laying of pipe lines for effluent collection and for the disposal of the

treated wastewaters.

66 Bathymetric studies need to be conducted and models shall be applied to predict the dispersion

patterns to determine the length of the outfall, if disposal is through a marine outfall.

67 Capital quantity of dredging material, disposal and its impact on aquatic life.

68 Details on fisheries study which are conducted w.r.t. benthos and marine organic

material and coastal fisheries.

69 Details of storm water collection network and utilization plan, etc.

70 Proposed measures for occupational safety and health of the workers.


Chairman

116



72 Drainage area and alterations, if any due to the project.


Environmental monitoring program:

74 Monitoring programme for pollution control at source.


groundwater, surface water, gas quality, etc. during operational phase of the project.

76 Specific programme to monitor safety and health protection of workers


impacts on VECs.


monitoring.

Additional studies:


safeguard measures.












Purpose of the report


1 Introduction

Brief description of nature, size, location of the project and its


Chairman

117

Scope of the study – details of regulatory scoping carried out

Condensed description of those aspects of the project (based on

project feasibility study), likely to cause environmental effects.

Details should be provided to give clear picture of the following:

Type of project

Need for the project

Location (maps showing general location, specific location,

project boundary & project site layout)

Size or magnitude of operation (incl. Associated activities

required by / for the project)

Proposed schedule for approval and implementation

Technology and process description

Project description including drawings showing project layout,

components of project etc. Schematic representations of


purpose

Description of mitigation measures incorporated into the project

to meet environmental standards, environmental operating

conditions, or other EIA requirements (as required by the scope)


Assessment of New & untested technology for the risk of





Environment


Details of Investigated Environmental impacts due to project

location, possible accidents, project design, project construction,

regular operations, final decommissioning or rehabilitation of a

completed project

Measures for minimizing and / or offsetting adverse impacts

identified

Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of environmental

components



4 Anticipated

Environmental

Impacts & Mitigation

Measures

Mitigation measures

5 Analysis of Incase, the scoping exercise results in need for alternatives:

Chairman

118

Description of each alternative

Summary of adverse impacts of each alternative

Alternatives

(Technology & Site)

Mitigation measures proposed for each alternative and selection

of alternative

6 Environmental

Monitoring Program

Technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation

measures (incl. measurement methodologies, frequency, location,

data analysis, reporting schedules, emergency procedures,

detailed budget & procurement schedules)

Public consultation

Risk assessment


Social impact assessment, R&R action plans




8 Project Benefits



Benefit Analysis


10 EMP Description of the administrative aspects that ensures proper

implementation of mitigative measures and their effectiveness

monitored, after approval of the EIA

Overall justification for implementation of the project

11 Summary &

Conclusion (This

will constitute the

summary of the EIA

Report) Explanation of how, adverse effects have been mitigated

12 Disclosure of

Consultants engaged

Names of the Consultants engaged with their brief resume

and nature of Consultancy rendered

Chairman

119

TOR for Power Plants

ToR for EIA studies in respect of the Thermal Power Plants include, but not limited to the following:

1 Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal, use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a compilation of EIA report including EMP and post-project monitoring plan in brief.


2 Justification for selecting the proposed unit size.

3 Land requirement for the project including its break up for various purposes, its availability and optimization.

4 Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating various units of the plant.

5 Complete process flow diagram describing each unit, its processes and operations, along with material and energy inputs & outputs (material and energy balance).

6 Details on requirement of raw materials, its source and storage at the plant.

7 Fuel analysis report (sulphur, ash content and mercury) including details of auxiliary fuel, if any.

Details like quantity, quality, storage etc.,

8 Quantity of fuel required its source and transportation, a confirmed fuel linkage/ copy of the MoU.

9 Source of water and its availability. Proof regarding availability of requisite quantity of water from the

competent authority.

10 Details on water balance including quantity of effluent generated, recycled & reused. Efforts to

minimize effluent discharge and to maintain quality of receiving water body.

11 Details of effluent treatment plant, inlet and treated water quality with specific efficiency of each

treatment unit in reduction in respect of all concerned/regulated environmental parameters.

12 Location of intake and outfall points (with coordinates) based on modeling studies. Details of modeling

and the results obtained. It may be kept in view that the intake and outfall points are away from the

mangroves.

13 Examine the feasibility of zero discharge. In case of any proposed discharge, its quantity, quality and

point of discharge, users downstream, etc.

14 Explore the possibility of cooling towers installation. Details regarding the same.

15 Details regarding fly ash utilization as per new notification

16 Detailed plan of ash utilization / management.

17 Details of evacuation of ash.

Chairman

120

18 Details regarding ash pond impermeability and whether it would be lined, if so details of the lining etc.

19 Details of desalination plant and disposal of sludge.

20 Details of proposed source-specific pollution control schemes and equipments to meet the national

standards.



23 Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel storage, restroom, etc. to the workers

during construction and operation phase.

24 In case of expansion of existing industries, remediation measures adopted to restore the environmental

quality if the groundwater, soil, crop, air, etc., are affected and a detailed compliance to the prior

environmental clearance/consent conditions.



Description of the Environment:

26 The study area shall be up to a distance of 10 km from the boundary of project area for air quality

considerations in view of impacts occurring at distant locations once emitted from a tall stack

particularly in view of absence of source control for SO2 in tail gases whereas for impacts on other

components (such as water, soil quality and noise monitoring, etc.) the study area may be up to a

distance of 5 Km.

27 Location of the project site and nearest habitats with distances from the project site to be demarcated on

a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).

28 Landuse based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such as national parks /






32 Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the study area.



35 Details on water quality parameters such as Temperature, pH*, TOC*, Colour*, TDS*, BOD*, COD*,

N (total)*, Mineral oils*, Free chlorine* , NH3*, Fish*, toxicity*, Sb*, PAH Metals* (Co, Mn, Tl, V,

Sn, Cd, Cr, Ni, Cu, Hg, Pb, Zn , etc.) CN*, S*, SO3*, SO4*, EOX*, Phenol*, PCDD/PCDF*, P (total)

Chairman

121

TSS*, Cl-*, FAs* , BTEX*, etc. (* - as applicable)

36 Details on existing ambient air quality and expected, stack and fugitive emissions for PM10, PM 2.5,

SO2*, NOx*, O3*, VOCs*, Hg*, suspended particulates* etc., and evaluation of the adequacy of the

proposed pollution control devices to meet standards for point sources and to meet AAQ standards. (*

- As applicable)






41 Proposed baseline monitoring network for the consideration and approval of the Competent Authority.



If any incompatible land use attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance for review and acceptance by the EAC/SEAC. Incompatible land use attributes include:

A Public water supply areas from rivers/surface water bodies, from ground water

B Scenic areas/tourism areas/hill resorts

C Religious places, pilgrim centers that attract over 10 lakh pilgrims a year

D Protected tribal settlements (notified tribal areas where industrial activity is not permitted)

E Monuments of national significance, World Heritage Sites

F Cyclone, Tsunami prone areas (based on last 25 years)

G Airport areas

43

H Any other feature as specified by the State or local government and other features as locally applicable, including prime agricultural lands, pastures, migratory corridors, etc

If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance for review and acceptance by the SEAC. Ecological sensitive attributes include:

A National parks

B Wild life sanctuaries Game reserve

C Tiger reserve/elephant reserve/turtle nesting ground

D Mangrove area

44

E Wetlands

Chairman

122

F Reserved and protected forests, etc.

G Any other closed/protected area under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, any other area locally applicable

45 If the location falls in Valley, specific issues connected to the natural resources management shall be studied and presented.

If the location falls in CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies demarcating LTL, HTL, CRZ area, location of the project and associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any.

a Provide the CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for specific observations.

b Proposed site for disposal of dredged material and environmental quality at the point of disposal/impact areas.

46

c Fisheries study should be done w.r.t. Benthos and Marine organic material and coastal fisheries.

Anticipated environmental impacts and Mitigation Measures:

47 Anticipated generic environmental impacts due to this project, which may be evaluated for significance and based on corresponding likely impacts VECs may be identified. Baseline studies may be conducted for all the concerned VECs and likely impacts will have to be assessed for their magnitude in order to identify mitigation measures.

48 Tools used for the assessment of environmental impacts.

49 Impact on drainage of the area and the surroundings.

50 Impact of the project on the AAQ of the area. Details of the model used and the input data used for modeling should also be provided. The air quality contours may be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any. The wind roses should also be shown on this map.

51 Impact of the project on local infrastructure of the study area such as road network, etc. In case if the

study area requires any additional infrastructure, details of the agency responsible for the same should

be included along with the time frame. Details of the permission from Competent Authority for

conveyor belt crossing the village road.

52 Impact of the activities to be taken up in the CRZ area including jetty and desalination plant etc.,

should be integrated into the EIA report; however, action should be taken to obtain separate clearance

from the competent authority as may be applicable to such activities.

53 Details of rainwater harvesting and its proposed usage in the plant.

54 Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom, etc., to be provided to the

workers during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers during the

operational phase.

Chairman

123

55 Details of flora and fauna. Conservation plan in case of any scheduled fauna.


57 Oil spill control planning.

58 Off-shore coastal air dispersion models shall be applied.

59 Capital quantity of dredging material, disposal and its impact on aquatic life.

60 Fisheries study should be done with respect to Benthos and Marine organic material and coastal

fisheries.

61 Proposed odour control measures.

62 Action plan for the greenbelt development – species, width of plantations, planning schedule etc. in




64 Identifying the mitigation measures, source control and treatment.

Analysis of alternative resources and technologies

65 Comparison of alternate sites considered and the reasons for selecting the proposed site. Conformity of

the site with the prescribed guidelines in terms of Coastal Regulatory Zone (CRZ), river, highways,

railways etc.

66 Details of alternative sources of energy such as photovoltaic cells use in the plant for various applications.


Environmental monitoring program :

68 Monitoring of pollution control at source

69 Monitoring of pollutants at receiving environment for all the appropriate notified parameters – air quality, groundwater, surface water, etc., during operational phase of the project.

70 Specific programme to monitor occupational safety and health protection of workers.

71 Appropriate monitoring network has to be designed and proposed, to assess the

possible residual impacts on VECs.

72 Details of in-house monitoring capabilities and the recognized agencies if proposed for conducting monitoring.

Additional studies :


safeguard measures.


Chairman

124


75 Proposed plan to handle the socio-economic influence on the local community. The plan should include

quantitative dimension as far as possible.





Environmental management plan:

78 Administrative and technical organizational structure to ensure proposed post-project monitoring programme for approved mitigation measures.

79 EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along with item-wise cost of its implementation (Capital and recurring costs).



Above points shall be adequately addressed in the EIA report in addition to the contents given in the reporting structure as below:


1 Introduction 1. Purpose of the report

2. Identification of project & project proponent

3. Brief description of nature, size, location of the project and its


4. Scope of the study – details of regulatory scoping carried out (As per

Terms of Reference)

2 Project

Description

Condensed description of those aspects of the project (based on project

feasibility study), likely to cause environmental effects. Details should be

provided to give clear picture of the following:

1. Type of project

2. Need for the project

3. Location (maps showing general location, specific location, project

boundary & project site layout)

4. Size or magnitude of operation (incl. Associated activities required by

or for the project)

5. Proposed schedule for approval and implementation

6. Technology and process description

7. Project description including drawings showing project layout,

Chairman

125

components of project etc. Schematic representations of the feasibility

drawings which give information important for EIA purpose

8. Description of mitigation measures incorporated into the project to meet

environmental standards, environmental operating conditions, or other

EIA requirements (as required by the scope)

9. Assessment of new & untested technology for the risk of technological

failure

3 Description of

the Environment

1. Study area, period, components & methodology

2. Establishment of baseline for VECs, as identified in the scope

3. Base maps of all environmental components

4 Anticipated

Environmental

Impacts &

Mitigation

Measures

1. Details of Investigated Environmental impacts due to project location,

possible accidents, project design, project construction, regular

operations, final decommissioning or rehabilitation of a completed

project

2. Measures for minimizing and / or offsetting adverse impacts identified

3. Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of environmental

components

4. Assessment of significance of impacts (Criteria for determining


5. Mitigation measures

5 Analysis of

Alternatives

(Technology &

Site)

1. Incase, the scoping exercise results in need for alternatives:

2. Description of each alternative

3. Summary of adverse impacts of each alternative

4. Mitigation measures proposed for each alternative and selection of

alternative

6 Environmental

Monitoring

Program

1. Technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation

measures (incl. measurement methodologies, frequency, location, data

analysis, reporting schedules, emergency procedures, detailed budget &

procurement schedules)

7 Additional

Studies

1. Public consultation

2. Risk assessment

3. Social impact assessment, R&R action plans

8 Project Benefits 1. Improvements in physical infrastructure

2. Improvements in social infrastructure

3. Employment potential –skilled; semi-skilled and unskilled

4. Other tangible benefits

9 Environmental 1. If recommended at the scoping stage

Chairman

126

Cost Benefit

Analysis

10 EMP 1. Description of the administrative aspects that ensures proper

implementation of mitigation measures and their effectiveness

monitored, after approval of the EIA.

11 Summary &

Conclusion (This

will constitute

the summary of

the EIA Report)

1. Overall justification for implementation of the project

2. Explanation of how, adverse effects have been mitigated

12 Disclosure of

Consultants

engaged

1. Names of the Consultants engaged with their brief resume and nature of

Consultancy rendered

Chairman

127

TOR for Metallurgical Industry

ToR for EIA studies in respect of metallurgical industry (ferrous and non-ferrous) may include, but not limited to the following:

1 Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal, use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a compilation of EIA report including EMP and post-project monitoring plan in brief.

Project description

2 Justification for selecting the proposed unit size.

3 Land requirement for the project including its break up for various purposes, its availability and optimization.

4 Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating various units of the plant.

5 Complete process flow diagram describing each unit, its processes and operations, along with material and energy inputs & outputs (material and energy balance).

Iron and steel :

a Details of Iron and steel making plant describing details on design and manufacturing process for all the units.

b Details on blast furnace/ open hearth furnace/ basic oxygen furnace/ladle refining, casting and rolling plants etc.

c Details on installation/activation of opacity meters with recording with proper calibration system

d Details on toxic metals including mercury, arsenic and fluoride emissions

6

e Details on stack height requirement for integrated steel

Details on ash disposal and management -Non ferrous metal :

a Complete process flow diagram describing production of lead/zinc/copper/aluminium, etc

b Raw materials substitution or elimination

c Details on smelting, thermal refining, melting, slag fuming, and Waelz kiln operation

d Details on Holding and de-gassing of molten metal from primary and secondary aluminum, materials pre-treatment, and from melting and smelting of secondary aluminum

e Details on solvent recycling, and

7

f Details on precious metals recovery

Chairman

128

8 Details of proposed source-specific pollution control schemes and equipments to meet the national standards.

9 Details on requirement of raw materials, its source and storage at the plant. Also, an agreement for the supply of the iron ore for the proposed plant.

10 Details on requirement of energy and water requirement along with its source and authorization from the concerned department.

11 Details on water balance including quantity of effluent generated, recycled & reused. Efforts to minimize effluent discharge and to maintain quality of receiving water body.

12 Details of effluent treatment plant, inlet and treated water quality with specific efficiency of each treatment unit in reduction in respect of all concerned/regulated environmental parameters.

13 Details of the proposed methods of water conservation, recharging.

14 Water drawl approval from concerned authorities.

15 Details on use of high calorific hazardous wastes in kiln and commitment regarding use of hazardous waste.

16 Details on composition, generation and utilization of waste/fuel gases from coke oven plant and their utilization.

17 Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly char and fly ash.

18 Details on toxic metal content in the waste material and its composition and end use (particularly of slag).

19 Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom, etc., to be provided to the workers during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers during operation phase.

20 In case of expansion of existing industries, remediation measures adopted to restore the environmental quality if the groundwater, soil, crop, air, etc., are affected and a detailed compliance to the prior environmental clearance/consent conditions.

21 Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.

Description of the environment

22 The study area shall be up to a distance of 10 km from the boundary of the proposed project site.

23 Location of the project site, and nearest habitats with distances from the site to be demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).

24 Landuse of study area should include data about the residential/ institutional/nearest village/ township/ locality/ housing society, industries, etc., based on the satellite imagery.

Chairman

129

25 Demography details of all the villages falling within the study area

26 Topography of the area clearly indicating the presence of pits deeper than one meter, if any. If these pits require to be filled in, details of filling material to be used, quantity required, its source, mode of transport, etc.

27 The baseline data to be collected from the study area w.r.t. different components of environment viz. air, noise, water, land, and biology and socio-economic.

28 Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area.


30 The location map drawn on Survey of India topo sheets with satellite imageries as regards its interference with natural drainage paths.

31 Details on ground water quality near solid waste dump zone.

32 Details on water quality for parameters pH, temperature, COD, Biochemical oxygen demand (27oC, 3 days), TDS*, Suspended solids*, Phenolic compounds (As C6H5OH)*, Cyanides (As CN)*, Oil & grease*, Ammonical nitrogen (As N)*, chlorides*, sulphides*, etc. (* - As applicable)

33 Relevant ambient air quality parameters for monitoring include following:

a Iron & Steel: SO2, NOx, PM10, PM 2.5, O3, Pb, CO, NH3, C6H6, BaP.

b Aluminum: SO2, NOx, PM10, PM 2.5, O3, Pb, CO, NH3, fluoride

c Lead & Zinc: SO2, NOx, PM10, PM 2.5, O3, Pb, CO, NH3, As, Ni.

d Copper: SO2, NOx, PM10, PM 2.5, O3, Pb, CO, As, Ni, Acid mist

e Coke ovens: SO2, NOx, PM10, PM 2.5, O3, Pb, CO, C6H6, BaP.

f Sponge Iron: SO2, NOx, PM10, PM 2.5, O3, Pb, CO.

g Secondary non-ferrous: SO2, NOx, PM10, PM 2.5, O3, Pb, CO, As, Ni, Acid mist.

34 Details on existing ambient air quality and expected, stack and fugitive emissions may be monitored for SPM*, PM10*, PM2.5*, SO2*, NOx*, HC*, CO*, acid mist*, VOC* and Benzopyrenes* (at ground level and at battery top), etc. and evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed pollution control devices to meet gaseous emissions and Dust fall data with heavy metal analysis. (* - as applicable)

35 The air quality contours may be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any and wind roses.

36 Proposed pollution control devices for the controlling the releasing of SPM to 50 mg/m3



39 Noise levels at sensitive/commercial receptor.

40 Proposed baseline monitoring network for the consideration and approval of the Competent Authority.

Chairman

130

41 Ecological status (terrestrial and aquatic) of the study area such as habitat type and quality, species, diversity, rarity, fragmentation, ecological linkage, age, abundance, etc.

If any incompatible land use attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance for review and acceptance by the EAC/SEAC. Incompatible land use attributes include:

a Public water supply areas from rivers/surface water bodies, from ground water

b Scenic areas/tourism areas/hill resorts

c Religious places, pilgrim centers that attract over 10 lakh pilgrims a year

d Protected tribal settlements (notified tribal areas where industrial activity is not permitted)

e Monuments of national significance, World Heritage Sites

f Cyclone, Tsunami prone areas (based on last 25 years)

g Airport areas

42

h Any other feature as specified by the State or local government and other features as locally applicable, including prime agricultural lands, pastures, migratory corridors, etc

If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance for review and acceptance by the EAC/ SEAC. Ecological sensitive attributes include:

a National parks

b Wild life sanctuaries Game reserve

c Tiger reserve/elephant reserve/turtle nesting ground

d Mangrove area

e Wetlands

f Reserved and protected forests

g Any other closed/protected area under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972,

43

h Any other eco-sensitive areas

44 If the location falls in Valley, specific issues connected to the natural resources management shall be studied and presented.

If the location falls in CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies demarcating LTL, HTL, CRZ area, location of the project and associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any.

a Provide the CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for specific observations.

45

b Proposed site for disposal of dredged material and environmental quality at the point of

Chairman

131


c Fisheries study should be done w.r.t. Benthos and Marine organic material and coastal fisheries.

Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures

46 Anticipated generic environmental impacts due to this project, which may be evaluated for significance and based on corresponding likely impacts VECs may be identified. Baseline studies may be conducted for all the concerned VECs and likely impacts will have to be assessed for their magnitude in order to identify mitigation measures.

47 Tools used for the assessment of environmental impacts.

48 Air pollution control system to be installed should be elaborated upon to control SPM emissions within 50 mg/Nm3 and leakages from coke oven as per the Notified standards.

49 Sulphur removal from CO gas containing H2S as per the notified standards.


51 Dry quenching of coke/modified wet quenching of coke as per the notified standards.

52 Pushing side emission control as per the notified standards.

53 Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment including agricultural land.

54 Unit-wise air pollution control measures proposed for the control of gaseous emissions from all the sources should be incorporated.

55 Impact of the project on the AAQ of the area. Details of the model used and the input data used for modeling should also be provided. The air quality contours may be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any. The wind roses should also be shown on this map.

56 Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack/fugitive emission based on site-specific meteorological features. Air quality modeling for specific pollutants needs to be done.

57 Proper and full utilization of coke oven gases in BOF/BF/Coke oven gas plant and no discharge of gases into the air should be included.

58 Note on treatment of wastewater from different plants, recycle and reuse for different purposes.

59 Efforts made to minimize use of groundwater and impact on the groundwater, if any due the proposed project.

60 Impact of noise and measures taken for its control.

61 Char handling and management

62 Hazard identification taking resources to hazardous indices, inventory analysis, natural hazardous probability, etc., Consequent analysis of failure and accidents resulting in release of hazardous substances.

Chairman

132

63 Impact of toxic metal content in the waste material and its mitigating measures

64 Impact of storm water and mitigating measures.

65 Surface as well as roof top rainwater harvesting and groundwater recharge should be included.

66 Action plan for the greenbelt development – species, width of plantations, planning schedule etc. in accordance to CPCB published guidelines.

67 Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly tar and sludge from by product plant, dust from APCS etc.

68 Assessment report of the impact of transport of raw material and finished product on the transport system.

69 Proposed measures for occupational safety and health of the workers. Indian Factories Act must be referred for values of work zone concentration and other provisions.

70 Identifying the mitigation measures, source control and treatment.


71 Comparison of alternate sites considered and the reasons for selecting the proposed site. Conformity of the site with the prescribed guidelines in terms of CRZ, river, highways, railways, etc

72 Details of clean technologies or any other improved technologies.


73 Monitoring of pollution control at source

74 Monitoring of pollutants at receiving environment for all the appropriate notified parameters – air quality, groundwater, surface water, etc., during operational phase of the project.

75 Specific programme to monitor occupational safety and health protection of workers.

76 Appropriate monitoring network has to be designed and proposed, to assess the possible residual impacts.

77 Monitoring of carbon foot print

78 Details of in-house monitoring capabilities and the recognized agencies if proposed for conducting monitoring.


79 Impact of the project on local infrastructure of the area such as road network and whether any additional infrastructure would need to be constructed and the agency responsible for the same with timeframe.

Chairman

133

80 Details on risk assessment and damage control during different phases of the project and proposed safeguard measures.

81 Details on socio-economic development activities such as commercial property values, generation of jobs, education, social conflicts, cultural status, accidents, etc.

82 Proposed plan to handle the socio-economic influence on the local community. The plan should include quantitative dimension as far as possible.

83 Details on compensation package for the people affected by the project, considering the socio-economic status of the area, homestead oustees, land oustees, and landless labourers.

84 Points identified in the public hearing and commitment of the project proponent to the same. Detailed action plan addressing the issues raised, and the details of necessary allocation of funds.

85 Details on plan for corporate social responsibility including the villages, population spread, SC/ST/backward communities, upgradation of existing schools, establishing new schools with facilities (such as laboratories, toilets, etc.), link roads, community halls, primary health facilities, health camps, etc.

Environmental management plan:

86 Administrative and technical organizational structure to ensure proposed post-project monitoring programme for approved mitigation measures.

87 EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along with item-wise cost of its implementation (Capital and recurring costs).

88 Mitigation measures and EMP for construction work camps and slums formed during construction and operation including other induced developments



Above points shall be adequately addressed in the EIA report in addition to the contents given in the reporting structure as below:


1 Introduction 1. Purpose of the report

2. Identification of project & project proponent

3. Brief description of nature, size, location of the project and its


4. Scope of the study – details of regulatory scoping carried out (As per

Terms of Reference)

2 Project Condensed description of those aspects of the project (based on project

Chairman

134

Description feasibility study), likely to cause environmental effects. Details should be


1. Type of project

2. Need for the project

3. Location (maps showing general location, specific location, project


4. Size or magnitude of operation (incl. Associated activities required by

or for the project)

5. Proposed schedule for approval and implementation

6. Technology and process description

7. Project description including drawings showing project layout,

components of project etc. Schematic representations of the feasibility

drawings which give information important for EIA purpose

8. Description of mitigation measures incorporated into the project to meet

environmental standards, environmental operating conditions, or other EIA

requirements (as required by the scope)

9. Assessment of new & untested technology for the risk of technological

failure

3 Description of

the Environment

1. Study area, period, components & methodology

2. Establishment of baseline for VECs, as identified in the scope

3. Base maps of all environmental components

4 Anticipated

Environmental

Impacts &

Mitigation

Measures

1. Details of Investigated Environmental impacts due to project location,

possible accidents, project design, project construction, regular operations,

final decommissioning or rehabilitation of a completed project

2. Measures for minimizing and / or offsetting adverse impacts identified

3. Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of environmental components

4. Assessment of significance of impacts (Criteria for determining


5. Mitigation measures

5 Analysis of

Alternatives

(Technology &

1. Incase, the scoping exercise results in need for alternatives:

2. Description of each alternative

3. Summary of adverse impacts of each alternative

Chairman

135

Site) 4. Mitigation measures proposed for each alternative and selection of

alternative

6 Environmental

Monitoring

Program

Technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation measures (incl.

measurement methodologies, frequency, location, data analysis, reporting

schedules, emergency procedures, detailed budget & procurement schedules)

7 Additional

Studies

1. Public consultation

2. Risk assessment

3. Social impact assessment, R&R action plans

8 Project Benefits 1. Improvements in physical infrastructure

2. Improvements in social infrastructure

3. Employment potential –skilled; semi-skilled and unskilled

4. Other tangible benefits

9 Environmental

Cost Benefit

Analysis


10 EMP Description of the administrative aspects that ensures proper implementation of

mitigation measures and their effectiveness monitored, after approval of the

EIA.

11 Summary &

Conclusion (This

will constitute

the summary of

the EIA Report)

1. Overall justification for implementation of the project

2. Explanation of how, adverse effects have been mitigated

12 Disclosure of

Consultants

engaged

Names of the Consultants engaged with their brief resume and nature of


Chairman

136

TOR for Industrial Estates (Pharma SEZ)

ToR for EIA studies in respect of proposed Industrial Estates may include, but not limited to the

following:

1 Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal, use

of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a compilation of EIA report including

EMP and post-project monitoring plan in brief.


2 Details of the industries, for which the estate is being planned and their proposed capacities of

installation, if available. In the absence of complete details, indicate the type of industries and

capacity being considered.

3 Land requirement for the project including the peripheral greenbelt inside the boundary.

4 Justification for selecting the proposed size of the IEs.

5 Details on strategy being followed for development of IE.

6 Layout map of estate indicating processing zones, admin area, roads, plots, green belt, common

utilities area, etc., shall be shown along with contour map. Landscape plan including open spaces

may be described.

7 Classify the proposed industries based on their pollution potential to the extent possible i.e., A1 to

A4 categories for air pollution and W1 to W4 categories for water pollution - CPCB Guidance may

be referred for classification.

8 Backward and forward linkages of the IEs (availability of input resources and markets for the

products / by-products and anticipated benefits for the regional development).

9 Details of Infrastructure Development within the IE and in the region.

10 Details on known industrial activity-specific proposed processes, resource consumption and rejects

assessment.

11 Details on estimated quantity of fuel required, fuel type, nature, source and transportation.

12 Details on estimated water balance taking into account conservation measures, reuse and recycling

of treated effluents.

13 Individual and/or common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal (all

effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, and hazardous wastes)

14 Commitment from the concerned authorities regarding availability of power, water and sewerage

network.

15 Details of Solid Waste management including arrangements for hazardous waste management and

e-waste.

16 Details on provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes.

17 Details on use of local building materials. The provisions of fly ash Notification should be kept in

view.

Chairman

137

18 Detailed plan of treated water disposal, reuse and utilization/management.

19 In case of site leveling involving quarrying, details thereof.




21 The project study area for EIA studies shall be up to a distance of 10 km from the boundary of the

proposed IE.



23 Landuse based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such as national parks /




26 Anticipated pollution loads from each of the known composition of industrial units. Cumulative

wastewater quantity and pollution load, point source–specific details for air pollutants and their

loads, total solid/hazardous waste generation etc.

27 Details of rainwater harvesting and how it will be used in the IE & outfall.



29 Identification of existing potential sources of pollution in the study area.

30 Present and projected population; present and proposed land use; planned development activities,

issues relating to squatting and relocation, community structure, employment, distribution of

income, goods and services; recreation; public health and safety; cultural peculiarities, aspirations

and attitudes shall be explored in study.

31 Details regarding availability of social infrastructure and future projections, details of facilities such

as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour force during construction as well as to

the casual workers including truck drivers during operation phase.

32 Detailed study of the hydrological and geo-hydrological conditions of the project area including a

contour plan indicating slopes and showing drainage pattern and outfall.

33 Information regarding surface hydrology and water regime and impact of the same, if any due to the

project.

34 Examine soil characteristics, topography, rainfall pattern and soil erosion.

35 Details on surface water quality of nearby water sources and other surface drains.

36 Details of groundwater quality in and around the IE.

37 Examine water quality with reference to Persistent Organic Pollutants, if relevant.

38 Details on water quality for parameters such as pH, Temperature (0C), Oil and grease*, Cyanide* (as

CN), Ammoniacal nitrogen* (as N), Phenolic compounds* (as C6H5OH), Hexavalent Chromium*,

Total chromium*, Copper*, Nickel* , Lead*, Arsenic*, Mercury*, Cadmium*, Selenium*,

Fluoride*, Boron*, Radioactive Materials*, Alfa emitters*, Hc/ml*, Beta emitters*, Hc/ml*, etc. (* -

As applicable). These parameters to be determined depend on the type of industries coming in

industrial estates.

39 Details on existing ambient air quality and expected, stack and fugitive emissions for PM10, PM

Chairman

138

2.5, SO2*, NOx*, O3, suspended particulates, VOC, Mercury, etc., and evaluation of the adequacy of

the proposed pollution control devices to meet standards for point sources and to meet AAQ

standards. (* - As applicable and these parameters to be determined depends on the type of

industries coming in industrial estates)



41 Mathematical modeling for calculating the dispersion of air pollutants and ground level

concentration along with emissions from boilers


43 Site-specific meteorological data including mixing heights and secondary data for future predictions.



Authority.

46 Fuel analysis to be provided (sulphur, ash content and mercury). Details of auxiliary fuel, if any

including its quantity, quality, storage, etc., should also be given.

47 Examine entry/exit of the project including the crossings from the highway and provision of service

roads on the basis of traffic density studies and analysis.

48 Climatic conditions of the study area shall be monitored for hourly wind speed, wind

direction, relative humidity, ambient dry and wet bulb temperatures and precipitation.



If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe the sensitivity

(distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance for review

and acceptance by the SEAC. Ecological sensitive attributes include:

a. National parks

b. Wild life sanctuaries Game reserve


d. Mangrove area

e. Wetlands


50


locally applicable

If any incompatible land use attributes fall within the study area, proponent shall describe the

sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance

for review and acceptance by the SEAC. Incompatible land use attributes include:

a. Public water supply areas from rivers/surface water bodies, from ground water




e. Monuments of national significance, World Heritage Sites

f. Cyclone, Tsunami prone areas (based on last 25 years);

51

g. Airport areas

Chairman

139

h. Any other feature as specified by the State or local government and other features as locally


52 If the location falls in Valley, specific issues connected to the natural resources management shall be

studied and presented.

If the location falls in CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies

demarcating LTL, HTL, CRZ area, location of the project and associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal

features such as mangroves, if any.

a. Provide the CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for specific

observations.

b. Proposed site for disposal of dredged material and environmental quality at the point of


53

c. Fisheries study should be done w.r.t. Benthos and Marine organic material and coastal fisheries.



based on corresponding likely impacts valued environmental components (VECs) may be identified.

Baseline studies may be conducted for all the concerned VECs and likely impacts will have to be

assessed for their magnitude in order to identify mitigation measures.

55 Tools used for the appropriate assessment of environmental impacts.



a. impacts due to transportation of raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment

b. impacts on surface water, soil, groundwater, drainage due to project activities

c. impacts due to air pollution

d. impacts due to odour pollution

e. impacts due to noise

f. impacts due to fugitive emissions

56

g. impact on health of workers due to proposed project activities

57 Proposed odour control measures.

58 Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to possible impact of infrastructure covering

water supply, pipelines, roads, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, temporary waste storage

facilities, treated wastewater disposal (land/sewer/surface water bodies), common facilities, etc.

59 Environmental condition scenarios shall be developed based on industrial activities and pollution

potentials.

60 Details of traffic density vis-à-vis impact on the ambient air.

61 Cumulative impact on regional supportive capacity shall be studied in terms of population density,

water supply, sewerage, storm water drainage, power supply, educational facilities, medical

facilities, public transport, traffic, housing for EWS, and community facilities, etc

62 Details on positive and negative impacts, direct and indirect impacts, induced impacts.

63 Project activities and impacts shall be represented in matrix form with separate matrices for pre and

post mitigation scenarios.

64 Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be described. Traffic

survey should be carried out on week days and weekends and also analyze the anticipated traffic

Chairman

140

increase.

65 Odour mitigation plan may be described. Also make provision of green cover as a measure for

mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between habitation and industry.

66 Rain water harvesting proposals should be made with due safeguards for groundwater quality.

Maximize recycling of water and utilization of rain water.

67 Temporary plans for the housing of construction labour within the site with all necessary

infrastructure and facilities such as fuel for cooking, mobile toilets, mobile Sewage Treatment Plant

(STP), safe drinking water, medical health care, crèche, etc.


69 Impact of the project on local infrastructure of the area such as road network and whether any

additional infrastructure would need to be constructed and the agency responsible for the same with

time frame.

70 Action plan for the greenbelt development – species, width of plantations, planning schedule etc.

within the boundary around the IE in accordance to CPCB published guidelines.



72 Identification of mitigation measures, source control and treatment.

Analysis of alternative resources and technologies :



74 Evaluate alternative disposal modes of effluent and solid wastes, from the point of view of disposal

points and associated impacts.

75 All kind of resources both renewable and non-renewable shall be taken into account.



77 Monitoring programme for pollution control at source.


groundwater, surface water, etc. during operational phase of the project.

79 Specific programme to monitor safety and health protection of workers.


impacts on VECs.


monitoring.



safeguard measures







Chairman

141

86 Public hearing should be conducted as per the prescribed procedure. Points identified in the public

hearing and commitment of the project proponent to the same. Detailed action plan addressing the

issues raised, and the details of necessary allocation of funds.

87 The historical importance of the area shall also be examined in the study. While this analysis is

being conducted, it is expected that an assessment of public perception of the proposed development

be conducted.

88 Describe the application of industrial ecology concept for planning of IEs. Explore possibility of

utilizing waste of one unit as raw material for the other units.

89 Specific chemical emergency response and proposed rescue system.

90 Details on corporate social responsibility proposal.

Environmental management plan :

91 Administrative and technical organizational structure to ensure proposed post-project monitoring

programme for approved mitigation measures.

92 EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along with item-wise

cost of its implementation (capital and recurring costs).



Pharma - SEZ specific points:

95 Details of Solvent Recovery Plant to be installed to recover the solvents and its monitoring

mechanism.

96 Mitigation measures to control fugitive measures.

97 Details of STP/CETP to be installed for the treatment of sewage and trade effluent generated to the

prescribed standards and recycling mechanism.

98 Detailed plan for compliance with the provision of rules and guidelines under Manufacture, Storage

and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989 and Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling

and Transboundary Movement) Rules,2008 as amended from time to time.

99 Plan for occupational health surveillance as per Factories Act.

100 Eco-developmental measures including community welfare measures.

101 Details of MoU with all buyers of the plot to ensure operation and maintenance of the

ETP/STP/CETP/TSDF etc and other assets.

If the location falls in CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies

demarcating LTL, HTL, CRZ area, location of the project and associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal

features such as mangroves, if any.

a. Provide the CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for specific

observations.

b. Proposed site for disposal of dredged material and environmental quality at the point of


102

c. Fisheries study should be done w.r.t. Benthos and Marine organic material and coastal

fisheries.



Chairman

142


Purpose of the report


Brief description of nature, size, location of the project and its importance

to the country, region

1 Introduction

Scope of the study – details of regulatory scoping carried out (As per

ToR)

Condensed description of those aspects of the project (based on project

feasibility study), likely to cause environmental effects. Details should be


a. Type of project

b. Need for the project

c. Location (maps showing general location, specific location, project


d. Size or magnitude of operation (incl. Associated activities required

by / for the project)

e. Proposed schedule for approval and implementation

f. Technology and process description

g. Project description including drawings showing project layout,

components of project etc. Schematic representations of the


h. Description of mitigation measures incorporated into the project to

meet environmental standards, environmental operating conditions,

or other EIA requirements (as required by the scope)


i. Assessment of new & untested technology for the risk of





Environment


Details of investigated environmental impacts due to project location,

possible accidents, project design, project construction, regular

operations, final decommissioning or rehabilitation of a completed project

Measures for minimizing and / or offsetting adverse impacts identified

Irreversible and irretrievable commitments of environmental components


significance, assigning significance)

4 Anticipated

Environmental

Impacts &

Mitigation Measures

Mitigation measures

In case the scoping exercise results in need for alternatives:

a. Description of each alternative

b. Summary of adverse impacts of each alternative

5 Analysis of

Alternatives

(Technology & Site)

c. Mitigation measures proposed for each alternative and selection of

alternative

Chairman

143

6 Environmental

Monitoring Program

Technical aspects of monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation measures

(incl. measurement methodologies, frequency, location, data analysis,

reporting schedules, emergency procedures, detailed budget &

procurement schedules)

Public consultation

Risk assessment


Social impact assessment, R&R Action Plans




8 Project Benefits



Benefit Analysis

If recommended at the Scoping stage

10 EMP Description of administrative aspects that ensures proper implementation

of mitigative measures and their effectiveness monitored, after approval

of the EIA

Overall justification for implementation of the project 11 Summary &

Conclusion (This

will constitute the

summary of the EIA

Report)

Explanation of how, adverse effects have been mitigated

12 Disclosure of

Consultants engaged

Names of the Consultants engaged with their brief resume and nature of


=o=

Documents

Minutes of the 53 State Level Expert Appraisal Committee