Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Minimizing Property Taxes: Leveraging the New IRS Repair Regs Strategies for Cost Expensing, Fixed Asset Capitalization Policies, and Avoiding Audit Flags
THURSDAY, MARCH 6, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern
WHOM TO CONTACT
For Assistance During the Program:
- On the web, use the chat box at the bottom left of the screen
- On the phone, press *0 (“star” zero)
If you get disconnected during the program, you can simply call or log in using your original instructions and PIN.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
This program is approved for 2 CPE credit hours. To earn credit you must:
• Attendees must listen throughout the program, including the Q & A session, in order to qualify for full continuing
education credits. Strafford is required to monitor attendance.
• Record verification codes presented throughout the seminar. If you have not printed out the “Official Record of
Attendance,” please print it now (see “Handouts” tab in “Conference Materials” box on left-hand side of your computer
screen). To earn Continuing Education credits, you must write down the verification codes in the corresponding spaces found
on the Official Record of Attendance form.
• Please refer to the instructions emailed to the registrant for additional information. If you have any questions, please
contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-866-961-9091 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address
the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the ^ symbol next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides and the Official Record of Attendance for today's program.
• Double-click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 4
Minimizing Property
Taxes:
Leveraging the New
IRS Repair Regs
Rebekah Feather, Senior Manager – Federal Tax
Sam Kinslow, Director – Property Tax
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 5
Questions You May Be Asking Yourself
The new IRS Repair Regulations make for tough
reading and seem confusing, what do they really
mean?
How are these new regulations different from the
prior IRS guidance? Why the change?
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 6
Questions You May Be Asking Yourself
My company incorporated the new IRS Repair
Regulations. What impact can they have on our
property taxes?
How can I leverage the new regulations to
improve property tax processes within my
company?
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 7
Agenda
What do the IRS Repair Regs Really Mean?
• Improvements to tangible property
• Dispositions
• De Minimis
• Materials and supplies
7
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 8
Agenda
What impact can the Repair Regs have on
property taxes? Can I leverage the regs?
• Fixed Asset Accounting
• Real Estate
• Personal Property
• Inventory and Supplies
8
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 9
Repair Regs - What was Issued?
• Final regulations under 162 and 263(a)
– Amounts paid to acquire, produce, or improve tangible property
• Re-proposed regulations under 168
– General asset accounts and disposition of depreciable property
– IRS and Treasury expect to finalize these regulations
in 2014
• Revenue procedures issued this year in two parts
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 10
What Hasn't Changed
• Unit of Property – the proposed regulations
continue to apply
• Betterments – same as the 2011 temporary regs
but with added clarification and examples
• Restorations – Essentially the same as 2011
temporary regs, however the IRS clarified the
definition for major components and substantial
structural parts of buildings.
10
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 11
Practical implications Rules affect any business that owns or leases
tangible property (TP)
Therefore these rules affect all businesses
11
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 12
Repair Regs
• Improvements to tangible property
• Dispositions
• De Minimis
• Materials and supplies
12
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 13
Improvements to property
General rule
A TP must generally capitalize an amount that IMPROVES a
unit of property ("UOP") if the amount:
(1) Is for a betterment;
(2) Restores the UOP; or
(3) Adapts the UOP to a new or different use.
13
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 14
Unit of property
• General rule: functional interdependence test
• Special rules: buildings, plant property, network assets, and
leased property
– Improvement standards must be applied separately to
building structure and building system
• Clarification of unit of property for leasehold improvements
– Work done on an addition previously made to a leased
building, consider the entire leased structure, not merely
the addition
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 15
Unit of property
Building systems include:
- HVAC systems - Fire protection and alarm systems
- Plumbing systems - Security systems
- Electrical systems - Gas distribution systems
- All escalators - Any other structural components
- All elevators in published guidance
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 16
Betterments
• General rule: A TP must capitalize an amount paid for a "betterment"
• An amount is paid for a betterment if it:
– Ameliorates a material condition or defect that either existed prior to
the TP's acquisition of the property or arose during production of the
UOP (regardless of whether the TP was aware of the condition);
– Results in a material addition to or addition of a major component
to the UOP, or a material increase in the capacity of the UOP;
– Results in a material increase in productivity, strength, efficiency, or
quality of the UOP or the output of the UOP.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 17
Restorations
An amount restores property if the amount:
1)Results in the rebuilding of the UOP to a like-new condition after
the end of its class life;
2)Is for the replacement of a part or a combination of parts that
comprise a major component or a structural part of the UOP;
3)Returns the UOP to its ordinarily efficient operating condition if the
property has deteriorated to a state of disrepair and is no longer
functional for its intended use;
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 18
Restorations
An amount restores property if the amount (continued):
4)Is for the replacement of a component of a UOP and the TP has
properly deducted a loss for that component (other than a casualty
loss);
5)Is for the replacement of a component of a UOP and the TP has
properly taken into account the adjusted basis of the component in
realizing gain or loss resulting from the sale or exchange of the
component; or
6)Is for the repair of damage to a UOP for which the TP has taken a
basis adjustment as a result of a casualty loss.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 19
Restorations
• Clarification of distinction between major component and
substantial structural part
• Incidental component, even though performs discrete
function, is not restoration
Major
component
Part or combination of parts that
perform a discrete and critical
function in the operation of the UOP
Substantial
structural part
Part or combination of parts that
comprises a large portion of the
physical structure of the UOP
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 20
Restorations
Clarified definitions
New definition provided for major component and substantial
structural parts of building
• The replacement includes a part or combination of parts
that comprise a major component or a significant portion of
a major component of the building structure or building
system, or
• The replacement includes a part or combination of parts
that comprises a large portion of the physical structure of
the building structure or building system
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 21
New or different use
An amount is paid to adapt a UOP to a new or different use if
the adaptation is not consistent with the TP's ordinary use of
the UOP at the time originally placed in service
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 22
New or different use
New and revised examples
New or different use:
• Manufacturing plant to
showroom space
• Develop land used for
manufacturing plant as
residential housing
• Retail drug store converts area
of pharmacy to walk-in medical
clinic
Not a new or different use:
• 3 leased retail spaces into 1
leased retail space
• Preparing a building for sale
• Grocery store converts existing
store space into sushi bar
• Hospital modifies emergency
room to also provide outpatient
surgery clinic
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 23
Other costs incurred during improvement
263A retained, new rule for removal costs
• Section 263A standard to be applied:
– Costs that directly benefit or are incurred by reason of the
improvement should be capitalized
• New special rule for removal costs:
– If a TP disposes of a depreciable asset (including partial
disposition) and has taken into account adjusted basis, costs
of removing that asset are not required to be capitalized
• Related amounts:
– Amounts paid over a period of more than one taxable year
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 24
New election
Election to capitalize repair and maintenance costs
• TP's may elect to capitalize amounts incurred during the
year as costs of improvements if TP capitalizes the
amounts on its books and records
• Election applies to all amounts treated as capital for books
each year
• Election made by attaching a statement to the return
each year
Slide Intentionally Left Blank
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 26
Repair Regs
• Improvements to tangible property
• Dispositions
• De Minimis
• Materials and supplies
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 27
Dispositions
• Re-proposed regulations
• Retirement of a structural component no longer mandatory
– Need for general asset account election eliminated
• Disposition includes sale, exchange, retirement, physical
abandonment or destruction of an asset
• Disposition also occurs when asset is transferred to a
supplies or scrap account or when a portion of an asset is
disposed of in sale, casualty event, like-kind exchange,
involuntary conversion or tax-free transfer
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 28
Dispositions
New election
• TP may elect to dispose of a portion of an asset. Includes:
– Structural components (or components thereof) of a
building
– Components or portions of 1245 assets
• Election is made in year of partial disposal by claiming gain,
loss or other deduction on the return
• Partial disposition (other than required situations) is a not a
method of accounting.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 29
Dispositions
Identification of asset disposed
• General rule = specific identification
• Special rule for mass assets or partial disposition (where
impracticable to determine the taxable year the asset was
placed in service)
– FIFO
– Modified FIFO
– Mortality dispersion table
– Any other method designated in subsequent guidance
– LIFO is not allowed
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 30
Dispositions
Basis of asset disposed of
• General rule = adjusted depreciable basis at disposal
• Special rule for mass assets or partial disposition = any
reasonable method
– Discounting the cost of replacement portion of the asset to its
placed in service year cost using the consumer price index
– Pro rata allocation of the unadjusted depreciable basis of the
asset based on replacement cost of disposed portion
– Study allocating the cost of the asset to individual
components
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 31
Dispositions
New example
• TP replaces 60% of roof in 2012- capitalizes replacement and
makes partial disposition election
• In 2022, TP replaces 55% of the roof of the building- capitalizes
replacement makes the partial disposition election for the
replaced portion
• TP cannot determine from its records whether the 55% is part of
the 60% replaced in 2012 or whether it is part of the original 40%
of the roof
• TP uses the FIFO method to identify the asset disposed of
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 32
Dispositions
New example - conclusion
How is the asset that is disposed of determined when TP
replaces 55% of the roof?
• Building is asset (including original roof) and 60% of roof
replacement in 2012 is a separate asset
• TP disposed of the remaining 40% of the original roof and
25% of the 60% of the roof replaced in 2012
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 33
Repair Regs
• Improvements to tangible property
• Dispositions
• De Minimis
• Materials and supplies
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 34
De Minimis
• Ceiling limitation eliminated
– No need to track expenses
• Replaced with safe harbor election which is based on
policies used for financial books and records at an invoice
or item level
• Taxpayers without an applicable financial statement can
now deduct reduced de minimis amount
• For amounts above safe harbor, taxpayer needs to
demonstrate clear reflection of income
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 35
De Minimis
• Applicable financial statement
– A financial statement required to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission;
– A certified audited financial statement that is
accompanied by the report of an independent certified
public accountant that is used for credit purposes,
reporting to shareholders, partners or similar persons, or
any other substantial non-tax purpose; or
– A financial statement (other than a tax return) required to
be provided to the federal or state government or any
federal or state agency
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 36
De Minimis
New election
TP with an applicable financial statement
• Written policy in place at beginning of year
• Policy to expense property costing less than a certain dollar
amount or property with an economic useful life of 12
months or less
• Deducts such amounts in applicable financial statements
• Amount paid does not exceed $5,000 per invoice (or per
item as substantiated by invoice)
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 37
De Minimis
New election
TP without an applicable financial statement
• Written policy in place at beginning of year
• Policy to expense property costing less than a certain dollar
amount or property with an economic useful life of 12
months or less
• Deducts such amounts in applicable financial statements
• Amount paid does not exceed $500 per invoice (or per item
as substantiated by invoice)
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 38
De Minimis
New election
• Safe harbor is elective each year
– Must include statement in the return
• Election applies to all eligible materials and supplies
• Labor, overhead, transaction and other costs of acquisition
can be included in de minimis safe harbor provided the
invoice includes such costs
• Section 263A does still apply to amounts deductible under
de minimis if expected to be used in production of other
property
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 39
De Minimis
New election- applicable financial statements
With AFS Without AFS
• Written policy to deduct $10,000
or less
• Written policy to deduct $1,000
or less
• Purchase 1,000 computers for
$5,000 each-substantiated by
invoice
• Purchase 10 computers at $600
each
• Deduct each computer as de
minimis
• Cannot use safe harbor
because each item is above
$500
• Would not be able to use safe
harbor if computers over $5,000
• Would be able to deduct if
computers were $500 each
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 40
De Minimis
Example- additional invoice costs
• TP w/AFS has written policy to deduct amounts under
$5,000
• Purchases wireless routers for office
• Invoice includes price per router or $2,500 and $20,000
total for delivery and installation
• $20,000 allocated on a pro-rata basis to each of the 10
routers
• Total cost for each router is $4,500 and can be deducted
under the de minimis rule
Slide Intentionally Left Blank
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 42
Repair Regs
• Improvements to tangible property
• Dispositions
• De Minimis
• Materials and supplies
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 43
Materials and supplies
• Materials and supplies include:
• Components acquired to maintain, repair, or improve a unit
of tangible property owned, leased, or serviced by the
taxpayer that is not acquired as part of any single unit of
property
• Fuel, lubricants, water and similar items expected to be
consumed in 12 months or less
• Property with economic useful life of 12 months or less
• Property with acquisition cost of $200 or less
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 44
• Rules largely the same as temporary regulations
• Some changes
– Definition now includes property that has an acquisition
or production cost of $200 or less (increased from $100)
– Definition of standby emergency spare parts included
– Election to capitalize certain materials and supplies now
only applicable to rotable, temporary or standby
emergency spare parts
Materials and supplies
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 45
Materials and supplies
• Non-incidental supplies
– Deductible in the year in which the materials are first
used or consumed in the taxpayer's operations
• Incidental supplies
– Deductible in the year in which amounts are paid
Incidental supplies are those for which no record of
consumption is kept or physical inventories at beginning
and end of year are not taken
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 46
Repairs - Current IRS Examinations
• LB&I directs agents to discontinue exam activity on repair issues
• The intent of the Directive is to discontinue examination of the issue
and provide taxpayers with a two-year waiver period to adopt the
appropriate methods of accounting provided in the revenue procedures
• Current examinations for tax years beginning before January 1, 2012
are to be discontinued and no new exams should be started
• If a 3115 was filed on or after December 23, 2011, examiners will
perform a risk assessment
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 47
Companies Should Do The Following:
• Compare current policies
– Acquisition policy (de minimis)
– Capitalization policy (repairs)
• Consider modification to current procurement process
– Capital expenditures request (CER)
– Capital appropriations request (CAR)
• Consider current method change opportunities
• Consider annual elections going forward
• Consider financial statement impact
• Consider property tax impact
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 48
Repair Regs Impact on Property Tax
• Fixed Asset Accounting
• Real Estate
• Personal Property
• Inventory and Supplies
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 49
Use the Repair Regs as an opportunity to improve fixed
accounting for property taxes
• Greater level of detail for the following:
– Acquisitions
• Freight, installation, and sales tax
• Indirect costs: appraisals, engineering, title fees
• Less bundling of assets or mass asset accounting
• Capitalization thresholds and policies
• The component for Financial Statements can drive change
Fixed Asset Accounting
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 50
Repair Regs Impact on Property Tax
• Fixed Asset Accounting
• Real Estate
• Personal Property
• Inventory and Supplies
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 51
Real Estate
What experience has shown in recent tax years and forecast for 2014
– Political pressure on assessors has made them reluctant to reduce
assessments; even in light of economic data demonstrating lower market
values
– Due to 2010 economic downturn, in some cases, assessments were
reduced a small percentage, but were they reduced down to true market
value?
– At the first glimmer of market improvement in 2012, many assessors
increased assessments immediately. They were not as quick to respond
when the markets were poor (if they reduced assessments at all)
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 52
Real Estate
What experience has shown in recent tax years and forecast for 2014
– The Repair Regs new methods of accounting for indirect costs such as
appraisals, title work, appraisals, engineering, etc. could be used by
assessors to increase assessments
– The Repair Regs new methods of accounting for leasehold improvements
could be used by assessors to increase assessments on real estate or
personal property depending on the state – especially in audit states
– With government budget shortfalls and renewed investor participation in
markets, assessments will likely increase for 2014
Slide Intentionally Left Blank
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 54
Repair Regs Impact on Property Tax
• Fixed Asset Accounting
• Real Estate
• Personal Property
• Inventory and Supplies
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 55
Personal Property
Scrutinize the Fixed Asset Ledger
• Remove assets which are no longer in service from the
fixed asset ledger. Anything on books is taxed at a 10-20%
residual value (No zero NBV in property tax)
• Assets booked to headquarter holding accounts that are
actually in the field. These may be taxed in both locations.
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 56
Personal Property
Scrutinize the Fixed Asset Ledger
• Look for items that are non-taxable or that no longer
have situs at the facility
Sort Cost from High to Low
Sort by Acquisition Date
Sort by Account Category and Number
Sort by Asset Description
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 57
Personal Property
Keep the personal property assessment date in mind
when making large equipment purchases
Example:
The assessment date in Arkansas is Jan. 1st. Rather
than taking delivery of a large manufacturing line on
Dec. 18th, 2012, the company takes delivery on Jan.
14th, 2013. This eliminates one year of property tax.
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 58
Personal Property
Develop customized physical depreciation tables
• Facility engineers can help you determine Total
Economic Life of your company’s specific asset
classes
Do your facilities operate 2 or 3 daily 8 hour shifts?
Then, your assets should qualify for shorter lives
Use Age/Life Method for depreciation in contrast to
assessors' standard tables
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 59
Personal Property
Report assets on returns using sub-categories
• Example: 2011 computer-controlled extruder with an
attached conveyor
If the equipment is booked as one asset, sub-
categorize the asset by computer, software, M&E, and
conveyor
In this way, the short-lived portions of the total asset
benefit from accelerated depreciation. Contrast this
with reporting all portions under M&E category
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 60
Personal Property
Incorporate Functional Obsolescence into returns
• Loss in value due to the inability of an asset to perform
adequately the function for which it was designed
Example:
A nail manufacturing unit cannot run at full
capacity due to a lower-rated sorter and
conveyor system at the end of the line
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 61
Personal Property
Incorporate Economic Obsolescence into returns
Loss in value due to an impairment in utility and/or
desirability that is caused by factors external to the asset
Example:
Due to loss of product demand, a plant that formerly
ran 3 daily shifts is now down to 2 shifts, only 4 days
per week.
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 62
Personal Property
Tips for Facility Tours:
First, visit facility without assessor to visit Engineers/Managers
Ask them, “If you could start over with a vacant shell, how would the flow
of the equipment be set up?” (Functional Obsolescence)
Ask them, “Is current product demand allowing you to run at full capacity?
(Economic Obsolescence)
Say, “The assessor says our conveyors should last at least 15 years, then
ask, “Do you agree?” (Physical Depreciation)
Second, bring in the assessor and point out these valuation items for
appeal. Quantify the issues and apply reductions to returns.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 63
Repair Regs Impact on Property Tax
• Fixed Asset Accounting
• Real Estate
• Personal Property
• Inventory and Supplies
© 2010 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 64
Inventory
Consider and file for loss in value of inventory due to:
Spoilage, theft, and returned items
Seasonal discounting
Markdowns due to lack of demand, poor mix, off-spec items
Unavailable Inventory of petroleum products (tank heel or pipe line-fill)
Expenses related to inventory maintenance (roll, brush, spray of pipe)
File for inventory exemptions:
Freeport, Interstate Commerce, Foreign Trade Zones
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 65
Rebekah Feather, Senior Manager – Federal Tax
1717 Main St., Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201
Sam Kinslow, Director – Property Tax
700 Milam St., Suite 300
Houston, TX 77002
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 66
The foregoing slides and any materials accompanying them are educational materials prepared by Grant Thornton LLP and are not intended as advice directed at any particular party or to a client-specific fact pattern. The information contained in this presentation provides background information about certain legal and accounting issues and should not be regarded as rendering legal or accounting advice to any person or entity. As such, the information is not privileged and does not create an attorney-client relationship or accountant-client relationship with you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information so provided. In addition, the information contained in this presentation is not specific to any particular case or situation and may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements.
You may contact us or an independent tax advisor to discuss the potential application of these issues to your particular situation. In the event that you have questions about and want to seek legal or professional advice concerning your particular situation in light of the matters discussed in the presentation, please contact us so that we can discuss the necessary steps to form a professional-client relationship if that is warranted. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein.
© 2013 Grant Thornton LLP, the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. This material is the work of Grant Thornton LLP, the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International, Ltd.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the U.S.
Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this
PowerPoint is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
(a) avoiding penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or (b) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Disclaimer
67
In accordance with certain professional standards, we inform you that this presentation supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional
services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. We encourage you to discuss with us or an
independent tax advisor the potential application of this presentation to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a
limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this document may be
considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this document is not intended by Grant
Thornton to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue
Code.
© Grant Thornton LLP
All rights reserved
U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
This document is the work of Grant Thornton LLP, the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd,
and is in all respects subject to negotiation, agreement and signing of specific contracts. The information contained
within this document is intended only for the entity or person to which it is addressed and contains confidential
and/or proprietary material. Dissemination to third-parties, copying or use of this information is strictly prohibited
without the prior written consent of Grant Thornton LLP.