Upload
sandra-brown
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mine Warfare Sea Trial Experimentation Issues/Plans
CAPT Rich Medley
6 May 2003For Official Use Only
5/6/03 2
Outline
Sea Trial Process
• Sea Power 21 Campaign Plan Development
• MIW CD&E Plan
• Sea Trial Events
• Sea Trial Information Management System
5/6/03 3
Sea Power 21
Sea StrikeSea StrikeFORCEnet
Sea BasingSea Basing
Sea ShieldSea Shield
Sea Trial
Sea Warrior
Sea Enterprise
5/6/03 4
Sea Trial
• Navy process for Joint transformation
• Integrates emergent concepts and technologies
• Continuously improves warfighting effectiveness
• Sustains a commitment to innovation
• NWDC serves as the Project Coordinator
5/6/03 5
The Task
• Implement Sea Trial– Formalize experimentation process with fleet
as a major partner.– Integrate Concept Development and
Technology insertion with fleet experimentation.
• Outcomes– Fleet-led, enduring process of innovation– Accelerated concept and technology
development– Enhanced headquarters/fleet alignment
All in a Joint environment
5/6/03 6
The Challenge with Navy CD&E
• Tremendous activity and investment in CD&E
• Not focused across echelons from Headquarters to Fleet
• Gaps between Concept Development – Experimentation – Implementation
• Lacks synergy w/ USMC & Joint Processes
5/6/03 7
Where we are…going
Sea Trial Process Initiated
Sea Power 21 Announced
Sea Trial Conference
Sea Trial Process Message
Naval Transformation
Roadmap
Sep 02
Building the Foundation
Jun 02
Oct 02
Jul 02
SP 21 Implemented
Defining the Process Process Execution
Feb 03
May 03
Feb 03STESG Mtg
Sea Trial Workshops
Nov -Dec 02
Sea Trial Campaign Plan
Mar 03
Sea Trial Playbook
5/6/03 8
Sea Trial Process
Develop Sea Trial Events
IntegrateSea Trial Events
JCDEFNCs
Tac D&ETitle X Games
Sea Trial Campaign
Plan
ExecuteSea Trial
ExperimentsExperiment
Analysis
OperationalAssessment
Sea Trial ESG
NCJO –
CONOPS
Iterative Experimentation & Development
Prioritized Naval Capabilities
N3/N5 Naval Strategy
CFFCDOTMLPF
Fast Track
N70 MCPs
DoN Transformation
Roadmap
5/6/03 9
Sea Trial Organizations
NWDC
CFFC
MCCDC
CPF
ONR
Operational AgentsSea Strike: C2F / C5FSea Shield: C3F / C7FSea Basing: C2F / C6F
FORCEnet: NNWC
Pillar GroupsSTESG Members
SYSCOMSNumbered Fleets
N7
CNE
5/6/03 10
MIW / MCMASW
N701
CSDS 12
SWDG
CUS
MCCDC
ONR
NSAWC
CMWC
MCCDC
NSOC
EOD
SWDG
ONR
NSAWC
HPC
NWDC
CMWC*
FIWC
CSDS 12
VX-1
N701
CPF*
NWDC
CMD
FIWC
VX-1
N701
HPC
Undersea Warfare
NSAWC*
SWDG
CSDS 12
NNWC
ONR
CUS
NWDC
ONI
N702
HPC
MCCDC
NNWC*
NSAWC
SWDG
CSDS 12
ONR
CUS
NWDC
ONI
N702
HPC
MCCDC
CMWC
NNWC*
NWDC
ONR
ONI
SPAWAR
N702
HPC
CMWC
NWDC
N702
NNWC
MCCDC
HPC
Conventional Strike(Include SOF) Air & Missile Defense
CNO
Sea Strike Sea Shield Sea Basing FORCEnet
C2F/5F C3F/7F C2F/6F N6, NNWC
NWDC
Sea Strike Sea Basing FORCEnet
NSAWC*
CMWC
SWDG
CSDS 12
FIWC
ONR
ONI
NNWC*
NNSOC
NSAWC
SWDG
CFFCN6
NSWC
N703
HPC
CMWC
NWDC
ONR
N61
N2
MCCDC
EOD
CUS
N931
SWDG*
NSAWC
CSDS 12
FIWC
MCCDC
CUS
HPC
AT/FP WDC
MSG
ASUW/MIO
NWDC
VX-1
CMD
N701
ONR
USCG
N42
EOD
NWDC
N 701
N 707
N 42
USCG
FIWC
ONR
NSAWC
SWDG
Force Protection
CFFC*AT/FP WDCMCCDCN701N931BUMEDEODHPCMSGCUSCMWC
NWDC
NAVSUP
MCCDC
CFFCN4
MSC
N931
BUMED
HPC
NSAWC
CMWC
Logistics
Regional
Fleet
Logistics
Coordination
N703
N42
ONR
EOD
NSAWC
NCFC
* Likely Supported Commander
Rev 3-27
Sea Trial C/D&E Collaborative Teams
STOM
NSAWC
SWDG
CSDS 12
MCCDC*
FIWC
NNWC
CMWC
NWDC
N702
EOD/VSW
ONR
HPC
N702
N701
N704
N703
Sea Shield
CFFC
Sea Trial ESG
Operational Level C2
NSAWC
SWDG
CSDS 12
MCCDC
FIWC
N61
CFFC N2
Mission Capability
Integration
NetworkBackplane
ISR
NWDC
N71*
N701
MCCDC
NSAWC
CUS
MDASWDG*N76ONRNSWCHPCFIWCONR
Strategic Deterrence
CLF
C5F
CSF
HPC
CPF
C6F
C7F
NWDC
ONR
ONI
NSWC
SPAWAR
N702
HPC
NNWC*
NSAWC
SWDG
CSDS 12
MCCDC
FIWC
N61
CFFC N2
CMWC
Information Operations
5/6/03 11
Mine Warfare Collaborative Team
• Mine Warfare Command• Navy Warfare Development Command• Marine Corps Combat Development Command• OPNAV N701• Office of Naval Research• Naval Surface Warfare Center• Surface Warfare Development Group• Submarine Development Squadron Twelve• Naval Network and Space Operations Command• Fleet Information Warfare Center• Air Test & Evaluation Squadron One• Explosive Ordnance Disposal Units
5/6/03 12
Outline
• Sea Trial Process
Sea Power 21 Campaign Plan Development
• MIW CD&E Plan
• Sea Trial Events
• Sea Trial Information Management System
5/6/03 13
The Way Ahead:Sea Trial Campaign Plan
• Comprehensive roadmap• Integrates studies, wargames,
experimentation, exercises– Evaluation metrics, execution timeline
• Identify promising Concepts & Technologies, improvements, systems
• Get warfighting capabilities to the Fleet
CNOGuidance for 2003
5/6/03 14
Approach • Defense Planning & Transformation Guidance• Joint Vision & Warfighting Concepts• Navy Vision: Sea Power 21• Arm y, Air Force, Marine Corps, Special Operations and COCOM ’s
Visions, Concepts & Capabilities• Assessments of Navy M ission Effectiveness• Advancing Technology
Context
• Naval, Joint and National• Core Challenges Facing the Navy: Today and in the Future• Adversary Strategic & Tactical Weaknesses• Potential Asym metric Advantages Over the Adversary
Challenges, Opportunities & Fleet Priorities
• Solving the Core Challenges• Creating and Exploiting Adversary Weaknesses• Synergistic with Joint/ Marine Corps / Other Service / COCOM
Concepts, Capabilities and Challenges
Strategy-Driven Concepts
• Test and Refine the Concepts• Designed to Answer Key Unknowns Regarding M ission Effectiveness,
Implementation Alternatives, and Composing & Operating the Transform ed Fleet• Spiral Developm ent and Evaluation Process• Allow Evaluation and Guidance by Fleet Commanders and Sailors• Establish Key Performance Thresholds and Material Developm ent Needs• Establish Revised Mission CONOPs• Provide “Fast Track” Prototypes and Key Niche Forces to the Fleet
Concept-Driven Experiments
“Ready”
“Aim”
“Fire”
• Prioritizes and implementsDOTLP improvem ents
Develop Doctrine and TT&P, andTrain Personnel
• Prioritizes, budgets, anddevelops material improvements
MCP, Requirements &Acquisition Process
Analysis/Assessment
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 15
4. Key Unknowns, Metrics, and Mode of Experimentation
4.1 Sea Strike
4.2 Sea Shield
4.3 Sea Basing
4.4 I&KA / FORCEnet
5. Execution
5.1 Experimentation Threads, Events, Assignment and Schedule
5.2 Budget
6. Implementation
6.1 MCP Impacts
6.2 Key New Capability Requirements
6.3 “Fast Track” Initiatives
6.4 S&T and R&D Guidance, Transition Targets, and Timeline
6.5 Doctrine and TTP Changes
6.6 Implications for Navy Leveraging Joint, Service and National Capabilities
Annex A: Concept Descriptions and Enabling Capabilities
Annex B: Guide to Planning and Conducting Navy Experiments
Annex C: Summary of Previous Navy Experimentation Results
Contents (Streamlined Plan for May ‘03)
Competing Capabilities, Feasibility, Performance, Risk and Cost
Force Structure and Deployment of Enabling Assets
Assembly: How do we put it all together?
Employment: How Best to Operate It?
1. Introduction
1.1 Authority
1.2 Background, Objectives and Approach
1.3 Scope
2. Future Environment and Mission
2.1 Capability Assessment and Core Future Challenges
2.2 Current Limitations/Issues
2.3 Joint and Service Modernization Environment
2.4 Future Naval Opportunities
3 Future Concept Summary
3.1 Sea Strike
3.2 Sea Shield
3.3 Sea Basing
3.4 I&KA / FORCEnet
Annex D: SCI/SAP
For Official Use Only
Sea Shield
JointAerospaceDefense
Homeland Defense
LittoralSea Control
Assured Access
AssuredPresence
In-portForceProtection
On-shoreForceProtection
To be Developedwith USMC
Deploy, manage, exploit, refuel, replace, reposition, recover and redeploy (DMER5) a range of off board and organic systems
Employ modular, flexible mission sensing, weapons and network capabilities
Deploy the associated platforms and network necessary to employ off board systems
Deploy and sustain forcesto deny the enemy theability to gain access toU.S. or allied powerprojection battlespace.
Deploy forces to conduct covert and clandestine battlespace environmental and operational characterization
Maximize deployment of unmanned systems in assured access operations
Synergize access and power projection forces in creating and sustaining access
Manage forces with an access-centric command and control structure and architecture
Provide analysis and decision aid tools to permit determination of the level of access at a given point,
Develop/Evaluate LCS Mission Packages and CONOPS for ASW, MIW, SUW missions
Evaluate various LCS modular aviation packages to enable LCS missions Develop/Evaluate LCS
Mission Packages and CONOPS for frequently conducted mobility missions.
Determine LCS capabilities/options re: organic vs. modular sensors and weapons.
Conduct vulnerability evaluations examining susceptibility, survivability and recoverability
Evaluate LCS/HSV in roles as host platform for experimentation
Analyze LCS compatibility, interdependence and integration with ESG and CSG across mission areas
Determine necessary battlespace environmental characterizations for all LCS missions
CONCEPTS
LCS EXPERIMENTATIONINITIATIVES (PARTIAL)
Concept-based ExperimentationInitiatives for LCS
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 17
Experimentation Threads and Schedule
Description ofevents inSection 4,
& threads inSection 5
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 18
Outline
• Sea Trial Process
• Sea Power 21 Campaign Plan Development
MIW CD&E Plan
• Sea Trial Events
• Sea Trial Information Management System
5/6/03 19
MIW Portion of the Campaign Plan
• Section 1 documents linkage to:– The Naval Operating Concept in support
of Joint Operations– The Naval Transformation Roadmap– Sea Power 21
• Section 2 is classified but discusses the Future Environment and Mission wrt MIW
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 20
MIW Concept Summary
• Rapidly locate and track all mines• Must account for buried, shallow water
and mobile mines• Use autonomous, unmanned vehicles• Utilize undersea networking• Consider tracking before deployment• Possible Courses of Action Include
– Destruction prior to deployment– Destruction of mine-laying platform– Mine avoidance– Autonomous mine clearance
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 21
Sea Shield(Access)
(2)
Sea Shield(Access)
(2)
Littoral Sea Control
(2.1)
Littoral Sea Control
(2.1)
Theater Air MissileDefense
(2.2)
Theater Air MissileDefense
(2.2)
L1
L2
ASW MIW SUW
Air & Cruise Missile DefenseBallistic Missile Defense
MIWexample
L3
Sea Shield
Concept Development Plan
Level 1 – Sea Power 21 Pillar
Level 2 – Goals identified in SP-21 and NTR
Level 3 – Capabilities required to reach the Level 2 Goals
Level 4 – Functionalities required for the Level 3 Capabilities
Level 5 – Identify / define requirements for Level 4 Functionalities
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 22
2.1.1Mine Warfare
2.1.1.1Mine
Countermeasures
2.1.1.2Mining
2.1.1.1.1Detection, Classification,
Localization, & Identification
2.1.1.1..2Neutralization
Level 2
2.1.1.1.3Delivery of Sensor &
Prosecutors
2.1.1.1.4Network-Supported
Common Operating Picture
2.1.1.1.5Operational and Tactical
Decision Aids
2.1.1.1.6Refinement of CONOPS
And TT&P for MIW
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
2.1Littoral Sea
ControlSea Shield
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 23
2.1.1.1.1 Detection, Classification, Localization, & Identification (Mine Counter Measures)
.1 Use inorganic sensors (e.g., space-based and covertly deployed long and medium duration sensors within an Expeditionary Sensor Grid) to
provide pervasive and preferably covert wide area sensing over land to assess the status of mines ashore prior to their deployment to delivery platforms.
.2 Covertly track the movement of mines from production and storage areas to staging areas and platforms.
.3 Autonomously detect, track, and establish track histories for mine deployment platforms.
.4 Detect when mine operations have commenced through identification of potential mine-laying events (e.g. splash, bottoming transients, and
visual)..5 Provide the environmental characterization required to allow for optimal
deployment decisions and MIW assessment, including bottom characterization and non-mine-like bottom object locations.
.6 Utilize organic assets including expendable and non-expendable OBS to determine changes to baseline environmental surveys and to detect, classify, and identify mines and mine-like objects in the contested littoral.
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 24
2.1.1.1.1 Detection, Classification, Localization, & Identification (Mine Counter Measures) - Cont
.7 Achieve overlapping and parallel coverage of the battlespace by utilizing a combination of OBS with different and complementary capabilities, to include Laser, Biomimetics, Acoustic, Chemical, Magnetic, EO, PCL.
.8 Improve capabilities to counter mine CCD (Camouflage, Concealment, and Deception) efforts.
.9 Display outputs from inorganic and organic sensors within a common operational picture that is continuously updated (24/7 MIW characterization for battlespace preparation).
.10 Rapidly locate and classify mine-like objects with high confidence, utilizing OBS mobility, multiple look angles, multi-spectral processing, on-board processing, and adaptive sensors.
.11 Positively identify contacts as mines to support neutralization or avoidance decisions.
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 25
.1 Assimilate information on mines and mine-like objects from all sensors to enable the decision maker to choose optimal mine neutralization tactics and options against mines prior to their introduction into the water.
.2 Assimilate information on mines and mine-like objects from all sensors to enable the decision maker to choose optimal mine neutralization tactics and options, including avoidance measures such as establishment of safe transit lanes and safe operating areas.
.3 Provide the decision-maker with full suite of destructive and non-destructive suppression and neutralization techniques.
.4 Enable parallel versus sequential mine detection through suppression/neutralization.
.5 Integrate new detection, classification, identification, and neutralization techniques with legacy/program Navy capabilities.
2.1.1.1.2 Neutralization (Mine Counter Measures)
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 26
.1 Optimize a MIW mission-capable platform, utilizing a roll-on/roll-off MIW mission capabilities module, capable of rapid delivery of OBS for battlespace characterization, mine identification and neutralization, exploitation of OBS network and inorganic signals, and operational and tactical decision implementation based on sensor field outputs.
.2 Deliver large numbers of MCM OBS from tactical air/surface/sub platforms or unmanned vehicles.
.3 Optimize size of OBS for modularity and physical manageability of high volume payloads.
.4 Optimize OBS power/mobility profiles.
.5 Determine optimal OBS/platform interfaces, deployment TTP and servicing options utilizing air/surface/sub platforms to allow for reduced manning in launch and recovery.
.6 Develop OBS delivery options that overcome physical barriers.
2.1.1.1.3 Delivery of Sensors and Prosecutors (Mine Counter Measures)
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 27
.1 Field a robust communications architecture that provides support for network range/bandwidth requirements (acoustic, laser, RF, fiber) for simultaneous use by all units in the littoral area of interest.
.2 Integrate surface, subsurface, OBS, and off-board sensor pertinent to the same contact(s).
.3 Enable networked fusion of sensor information from multiple sensor outputs within the common network.
.4 Enable off-board sensor and unmanned vehicle management from single consoles or operating stations.
.5 Fuse MIW common operating picture with decision support information from other domains (e.g. ASW, SUW, TAMD) to enable battle-space monitoring and management from single consoles or operating stations.
.6 Enable Naval, joint and coalition forces to exchange digital data, share information, collaboratively plan and execute operations.
2.1.1.1.4 Undersea Warfare Support Network (Mine Counter Measures)
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 28
.1 Provide a full suite of tactical decision aids and automated tools to provide optimized information to the operator.
.2 Provide operational decision aids to reflect commander’s intent and digital expressions of guidance.
.3 Allow access to shared databases and common doctrine, algorithms, and terminology within open architectures with multi-level security.
.4 Enable unmanned vehicle navigation and intelligent reporting capabilities (navigation, contacts, action reports, autonomous reaction to changing situations).
.5 Provide common displays enabling the operator’s decision processes for contact deconfliction and water space management.
2.1.1.1.5 Operational and Tactical Decision Aids (Mine Counter Measures)
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 29
.1 Provide fleet operators and decision-makers with robust concept of operations across all MIW (Mine Countermeasures and Mining) mission scenarios.
.2 Refine and mature the MIW Concept of Operations document, ensuring that the concept is developed in conjunction with and integrated with other concepts (e.g. ASW, SUW) required simultaneously to enable Littoral Sea Control.
.3 Provide detailed TT&P for missions, equipment, and OBS for all MIW mission scenarios.
2.1.1.1.6 Refinement of CONOPS & TTP (Mine Counter Measures)
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 30
.1 As an adjunct to Mine Countermeasures capability, utilize off-board sensors designed to gain battle-space awareness to enable effective own-force sea mining operations.
.2 Provide decision aids and campaign/operational models to assist operators in planning mining operations. Take into account environmental and threat assessments, mine sensors, desired mine effects, target types, available delivery methods and platforms.
.3 Enable flexible joint capability for precise mine delivery using submarine, surface and air platforms in a overt or clandestine manner .
.4 Enable new sea mining capabilities including remote control, standoff delivery, full water depth coverage, enhanced counter detection, mine safety and mine sterilization .
.5 Establish and maintain a capability to protect and maintain own-force mining efforts.
.6 Provide for safe, timely and cost effective sea mine removal when hostilities have ceased.
2.1.1.2 Mining
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 31
HIGH SPEED VESSELLITTORAL COMBAT SHIP
EXPERIMENTATION PLAN
Version 1.0
As of 3 January 2003
5/6/03 32
Mine ThreatInfluence & Contact Mines
Deep water to beach
LCS MIW Mission Module enables:• Coordination and direction of area MIW search employing off-board sensors & remote UVs Launch / recovery of MCM vehicle(s)• Bottom mapping and survey mission support• Coordination and connectivity with CSG/ESG• Mine avoidance & limited neutralization
• Signature management• Real-time connectivity with MIWC for re-tasking• Reach back for:
• Mission planning• METOC• Intel• Analytic support & data fusion
• Dissemination of mine location information• Common Operational Picture
LCS Littoral MIW Mission;• Conduct coordinated all sensor search
• CSG/ESG; MPA/MMA; UV’s; MH-60• Locate and neutralize (limited) mines• Establish Q Route(s)
• Punch through
MIW Mission for LCS
CSG
USVs
Q-Route
MH-60
LCS Value Added • Provides Commander with a first response organic mine detection / avoidance capability• Enables earlier flow of follow-on forces
Reachback
5/6/03 33
Potential MIW Venues
• 12-21 September 2003 (East Coast icw JTFEX 03-3); recommended emphasis on MIW experimentation.
• 22 October-7 November 2003 (West Coast icw JTFEX 04-1); recommended emphasis on MIW and seabasing experimentation as conducted during JTFEX 03-3 and the PELELIEU ESG LOE...
• 14-21 November 2003 (PCOA icw GOMEX 04-1); recommended emphasis on MIW/CSS experimentation with new/prototype systems.
• 4-30 April 2004 (Baltic Sea icw BLUE GAME 04); major MCM exercise. Experimentation to support MIW.
• 1-17 September 2004 (CCOA icw RONEX 04-2) recommended emphasis on MIW/CSS experimentation with new/prototype systems.
• 8-27 October 2004 (EUCOM icw UNIFIED SPIRIT) recommended emphasis on MIW experimentationl.
• 1-24 November 2004 (GOMEX icw MIW Training) recommended emphasis on MIW/CSS experimentation with new/prototype systems.
• 9-29 January 2005 (PCOA icw GOMEX 05-1); recommended emphasis on MIW/CSS experimentation with new/prototype systems.
• 23 March-4 April 2005 (CENTCOM icw ARABIAN GAUNTLET 05); recommended emphasis on MIW and Seabasing experimentation.
• 5-18 June 2005 (CCOA icw GOMEX 05-2); recommended emphasis on MIW/CSS experimentation with new/prototype systems.
• 19-30 June 2005 (GOMEX icw MIW Training); recommended emphasis on MIW/CSS experimentation with new/prototype systems.
For Official Use Only
5/6/03 34
Outline
• Sea Trial Process
• Sea Power 21 Campaign Plan Development
• MIW CD&E Plan
Sea Trial Events
• Sea Trial Information Management System
5/6/03 35
Sea Trial Events
• Link to an enabling capability of the Campaign Plan.
EXAMPLE: 2.1.1.1.1.6 Utilize organic assets including expendable and non-expendable OBS to determine changes to baseline environmental surveys and to detect, classify, and identify mines and mine-like objects in the contested littoral.
• Meet an established fleet priority.
• Developed with a sufficient analytical rigor to answer specific operational or tactical questions that further the Fleet’s warfighting capability.
5/6/03 36
Approved Sea Trial Events
• Sea Basing– Multi-National Split Staff LOE (C2F)…7 – 11Apr– FBE Kilo (C7F) 14…Apr – 5 May– JFMCC War Game…14 – 25 Jul
• Sea Strike– JFN IPB Phase II LOE…Apr– Hypersonic Rail Gun…14 Apr– JFN Workflow Management LOE…May– TES-N Fusion LOE…Jul
• Sea Shield– SOCEX 4-1…TBD– LWAD 03-3 ICW SHAREM 46…Jun – Joint Harbor Ops Center…TBD– SJFHQ Prototype LOE / CIE…8 – 26 Sep
• FORCEnet– Multi-National Split Staff LOE (C2F)…7 – 11Apr– FBE Kilo (C7F)…14 Apr – 5 May– JTFEX 3-3…12-22 Sep– ESG LOE / IPD…Sep / Oct
5/6/03 37
Outline
• Sea Trial Process
• Sea Power 21 Campaign Plan Development
• MIW CD&E Plan
• Sea Trial Events
Sea Trial Information Management System
5/6/03 38
Sea Trial Information Management System (STIMS)
• CFFC Sea Trial tasking to NWDC: “...develop and host an interactive database which will
serve as a “central library” of initiatives and technologies and serve as a useful tool to manage Sea Trial Events and related activity...”
• Desired database capabilities collected from stakeholders Nov 02 – Jan03 and documented in Functional Requirements Document (FRD)
• Developmental prototype system is posted on SIPRNET– http://www.nwdc.navy.smil.mil/nlls/stims– Evaluation/Limited Functionality/Test Data Only
• Schedule– STIMS 1.0 release scheduled for July 2003
5/6/03 39
5/6/03 40
5/6/03 41
5/6/03 42
Summary
• Sea Trial still a work in progress
• Campaign Plan is the roadmap
• NWDC is the Sea Trial Coordinator
• Sea Trial initiatives processed by NWDC
5/6/03 43
Points of Contact:
• General– CAPT Rich Medley– [email protected]– (401) 841-2833 DSN 948
• Sea Trial Initiatives– Mr. Rick Rigazio– [email protected]– (401) 841-7124 DSN 948
• STIMS– Dr. Mike Kopp– [email protected]– (401) 841-4172 DSN 948
Backups
5/6/03 45
FBE J MIW• SOCAL Operating Areas• 24 – 27 Jul 02: MCM Ops• 24 - 31 Jul 02: MIWC Ops• HSV experimentation objectives
– Command and control platform for MCM forces (COMCMRON, VSW Det, EODGRU ONE)
– Launch/recovery platform for Unmanned Under-water Vehicles (UUV), Unmanned Surface Vehicles (SAIC, ONR, JOINT VENTURE)
– Launch/Recovery/Collect Bottom Data and Mine Detection w/ Klein 5500 Sonar (SEA SLICE, EODMU 7)
– Launch/Recover EOD RHIB with REMUS from SEA SLICE (SEA SLICE, EODMU7)
– MEDAL/Naval Mine Warfare Simulation as Course of Action tool (COMCMRON,CSS)
– Reachback (EODGRU ONE, NAVO, COMCMRON)
5/6/03 46
Platform Characteristics• Speed: 38 Kts loaded, 48 kts empty• Range: 3000+ NM (empty)• 815 Short tons cargo• Draft: 13 ft (loaded)• Helo capable: CH46, MH/CH/SH-60• Crew - 30• Multi-mission, reconfigurable platform
High Speed Vessel--JOINT VENTURE
FBE-J/MC02 ParticipationBasing: San Diego Navy basesOp Area: Western Sea RangesMissions:• Mine Warfare C2, employment platform• NAVSOC C2, employment platform• STOM support• IBCT Back-load• Logistics/sustainment/medical platform
Comms/Sensor Employment• 4 Tactical Radios (UHF & VHF LOS, HF)• 2 UHF TACSAT DAMA• GBS (DBS Video Only)• GPS• TIBS/TDDS/TADIX• High Speed, Ku band (up to 27 mbps)
TCP/ IP (NIPR, SIPR, POTS (6, STU Capable))
• Autonomous Unmanned Vehicles, Pioneer Controller, & more
MIW
EOD/MDSU
MH-6O SIM
BPAUV
OWL III
C4IKLEIN 5500
REMUS
5/6/03 48
• No MCM Silver Bullets• Family of Systems or Tiered systems = 5 vs 21 days for Q
route clearance• Unmanned Undersea Vehicles reduced MCM Timeline
and threat to personnel and equipment• Covertness valued attribute• HSV and Sea Slice speed allowed sensor deployment
over large area• Sea Slice Stability for sonar/UUV launch and recovery• C4ISR suite support for MIWC C2 on HSV• Precision MIW munitions for STOM: FASM and Hydra-7• ISR assets and expertise required for Precision
Munitions• Tactics and technology for autonomous coordinated
multi-UUV ops.
Observations
5/6/03 49
Preliminary Recommendations
• Accelerate introduction to the Fleet of ONR unmanned undersea vehicles. Use this as opportunity to test case Sea Trial.– REMUS AND BPUAV (ONR)
• Develop unmanned surface vehicles for organic mine counter measures. (NUWC & SPARTAN ACTD proposal)
• Continue assessment of reconfigurable vessels for MIW. (NWDC, CMWC, C2F, C3F)
• Experiment with tactics and technology for autonomous coordinated multi-UUV ops. (NWDC, ONR)–