Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
41P11SE2037 2.23196 MACMURCHY010
Bennett VeinMacmurchy Township
Milling of a Gold Ore ForMaximum Recovery by Gravity
Separation
Date:
Prepared for: Prepared by:
22Aug2001
Pat RoskoMichael Nemcsok
fi Al Kon
Preface
This report investigates the use of gravity separation in the concentration of an
auriferous ore sample from Pat Rosko's claim number L1202 866. The intent is to gain
perspective on the use of gravity separation as a viable milling process on a production
scale. Mr. Rosko's goal is to determine the usability of his current milling equipment in
processing the ore available on this claim.
The success of gravity separation can also be associated with, or used to predict
the free gold content of the rock.
Michael Nemcsok,
tafcA^Mining Engineering Technician
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents l
Purpose 2
Background 2
Approach 2
Hypothesis 3
Equipment used 3
Procedure 3,4
Calculations 4
Discussion 4
Recommendations 5
Assay report sheets 6,7
Sample Source Property Location 8
Sample Source Location 9
Summary of Project Expenditures 10
Mining a Gold Ore for Maximum Recovery 22Aug2001Haileybury School of Mines Prepared by Michael Nemcsok A Al KonMilling fi Processing Research For Pat Rosko
Purpose
This report discusses the findings of the experimental laboratory investigation of a gold ore for maximum recovery using gravity concentration. A local prospector is assessing the viability of using a gravity circuit alone for processing of a gold ore from one of his properties.
Background
A gold ore sample from Pat Rosko's Bennet mine property was supplied for experimental mill trial for maximum recovery.
The gold ore was channel sampled from a 45 cm siliceous (quartz) vein woven with very fine chlorite and olivine strands. Country rock surrounding the vein is primarily mafic volcanic and was included in the channel sample across a proposed 1m working width.
Close observation of the sample pieces revealed some native gold in veins in the quartz, paralleling the chlorite veins. Euhedral iron pyrite crystals in the mafic volcanic wall rock were observed, but no pyrite could be found in the quartz vein material.
Approach
Preliminary assay results from TSL laboratories in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan suggested a fairly high grading gold ore of 36.25 g/t (1.279oz7t) gold, 10.3 g/t (0.363oz7t) silver. Visible coarse gold in the sample and a fairly high assay value prompted the use of gravity concentration for maximum recovery as per assignment directions. For a more meaningful report in consideration of Pat Rosko, a shaker table style concentrator was used, replicating the client's own milling equipment.
MiBing a Gold Ore for Maximum Recovery 22 Aug 2001Haileybury School of Mines Prepared by Michael Nemcsok A Al KonMilling A Processing Research For Pat Rosko
Hypothesis
Gravity concentration of the ore will yield fairly high recovery of gold from the sample under investigation.
Equipment UsedJaw CrusherCone crusherRifflerRolling PaperSpatulasBatch ball mills10 kg steel slug mill chargeRo-Tap machineSet of sieves down to 200 meshSteel pans for dryingSample drying ovenMass scale'Shaker Table' style concentratorBuckets, hose, fittings, etclOOOmL glass beaker for concentrate collection
Procedure1. The entire sample provided was crushed to 10007o passing 3/8", using a clean Jaw
crusher and cone crusher.
2. Coning and quartering of the initial sample yielded a l assay ton (approximate) sample that was sent for immediate assay for silver and gold by TSL laboratory in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. A similar sample was submitted to PolyMet Resources Inc. in Cobalt, Ontario.
3. The remaining 4 kg sample was recombined then coned and quartered twice, providing two ~1 kg head samples.
4. Each l kg sample was ground dry in a batch bail mill for 5 hours until they were 8007o passing 200 mesh. Samples were then oven dried and weighed.
5. One of the two '1kg' samples was put in storage as a back up in case of complications with the concentration attempt.
6. The second 856g sample was mixed with water to form a slurry of approximately 20^0 water. This slurry was poured into the feeder of an adjusted and running shaker table, and a gravity concentrate was recovered.
Mffllng a Gold Ore for Maximum Recovery 22 Aug 2001Haileybury School of Mines Prepared by Michael Nemcsok A Al KonMilling & Processing Research For Pat Rosko
T! The middlings were tabled twice, and the resulting concentrate tabled three times. This repetitive tabling simulates the use of two roughers and three concentrating tables.
8. The concentrate was weighed at 0.87g (9.5e-7). The concentrate was a black sand with spectacular gold dust and small nuggets throughout. Magnetic behavior of the black sand indicates a high iron content.
9. The concentrate was weighed and brought to PolyMet labs in Cobalt for gold and silver assays.
Observations
See attached assay reports for assay values of head feed versus concentrate.
Calculations
Percent Recovery (gold) = gold content of concentrate l gold content of head feed
= (392.035ozA x 0.9568385e-6t) l (0.632oz7t x 0.0009435785t)= 0.6290757
— 63 % recovery gold
Percent ^Recovery (silver) = silver content of concentrate l silver content of head feed.
= (53.33 oz/t x 0.9568385e-6t) l (0.256 oz/t x .00094357851) ^ 0.2112653s 21 *Yo recovery silver
DiscussionThe gold recovery achieved was quite impressive for using shaker tables alone for
gravity concentration. This level of success can be attributed largely to careful sample preparation and suggests that the bulk of the gold in the ore is free gold in the quartz.
The silver recovery was not quite as good as we would have liked, this may suggest that the silver is tied up in the pyrite or otherwise bound with gangue. Perhaps other procedures beyond gravity separation alone may have yielded a higher recovery.
Mflllng a Gold Ore for Maximum Recovery 22Aug200]Haileybury School of Mines Prepared by Michael Nemcsok A Al KonMilling A Processing Research For Pat Rosko
RecommendationsWet grinding in cyanide solution could improve recovery beyond the levels
attained in this experiment. Cyanide would leach silver and gold from the grinding ore, freeing it from pyrite and enabling a more complete recovery of the precious metals.
It is possible perhaps that running the tailings through a knelson concentrator may also improve the efficiency of the milling circuit.
Yet another more practical solution might be to grind the ore to a finer consistency (80*Mi passing 300 mesh) thereby liberating the finer particles which might be lost to tailings. Assays of the tailings and further test milling experimentation will define the optimum grinding and separation circuit design.
Hotmail Folder: Inbox Page l of2
MSN.CA j Hotmail [ Search j Shopping | Money | People St Chat
Get the information you need to PLAN your future
Search the Web
i start, l' Were
Home Inbox Compose j Address Book j Options Help Calendar
Save Address(es) | Block | Previous Next | Close
From : To :
Subject : assaysDate: Wed,^Aug 2001^0:15:47-0400 ^ _^ ^
Attachment : upeC105.jpg (125k)
Reply! Printer Friendly Version
Hi Mike, The assays from cobalt are attached. And from S'toon the numbers are: 36.25 g/t gold10.3 g/t silver.Al
Hotmail ServicesFree Newsletters Pop Mail Find Message Reminders Directories
Other Links
ione.com Csrpoint Auctions Business Finder People Finder Car Insurance Electronics
RESOURCES tNCS
PolyMet Resources Inc 1 Prestey Street Cobalt, Ontario
POJ 1CO Date
Lot No. 0-035
8/7701
Laboratory Report Sheet* 146 H.S.M.
.../getr
Sample NumberOapnane 4 Chad
#1 Head #1 K.C, Cone, in Float Feed
#1 Table Cone. #2 Head
K K.C. Cone. *2 Float Feed K Table Cone.
MUce&AJ Head A Cone. A
tisgYcurmbox^i
Ooid On/ton
0.216 1.104
OJ2 2.532 0.324 1.084 0244
1.44
0,632 392.035
)000000
Silver Ozfton
0.256 53.33
Jl&a^
Palladium Ozrton
2el544e.
Cirtfc
betaadc d6ay6c55tUb75d71 ifcms^M scjyy848ysi;722
Hotmail Folder: Inbox Page 2 of2
l l l l l lO
Yes NoFees Received
Except by special permission,reproduction of the*e results must
include any qualifying remarks made byPoiynwt Resources me
Notice: Attachments are automatically scanned for viruses using
Previous Next | Ctose
MSN.CA j Hotmail j Search j Shopping j Money j People St Chat J;) 2001 Microsoft Corporation. Ali rights reserved. TERMS OP USE TRUSTe Approved Privacy Sfcatema
.../getmsgycurmbox=^UUUUUUUUl&a=Jeel544eJ3etaaddd6ay6c55tUb75d71&msg=MbCryy!i48y S/22/U1
J 1 (Jeep C'di'jj S* mf le ntcmis ' n\ opt* cu-f
SCALEmo /o
(feet)l,'B*h - 10
lo AUG BY-' n-
PAT
SAMPLE
Rosko Mining Inc.
Date
20-Oct-OO
23-Oct-OO
1-Nov-OO
24-Oct-OO
22-Aug-01
Type of work
Sampling
Test Milling
Test Milling
Fire assay of samples milled
Report Writing
Total Mileage (km)Rate (S/km)Travel Expenses
Total HoursAverage Hoi
Travel ExpeTotal MateriTotal LabouTotal Value
Workers
Michael Nemcsok
Michael Nemcsok
Michael Nemcsok
Michael Nemcsok
Michael Nemcsok
3000.390
3527
9017
701
m
Worker's Tasks
Rope work (Rappelling S sampling)
Sample Prep, Lab batch milling
Sample Prep, Lab batch millingDeliver samples to Polymet Labs
Researching, Report Writing
Details
Sample taken from old stope floor.
A gravity concentrate was prepared to investigate maximum recovery of free gold from sample: Calibrating batch mill setup at HSM.
A gravity concentrate was prepared to investigate maximum recovery of free gold from sample: batch mill run of sample at HSM.
Head and concentrate samples assayed
Compile results of experimentation into report for Pat Rosko.
Total Project Expenditure Value:
Man hours
3
4
4
2
8
Rate (S/n)
15
18
18
10
S BIG ,
Mileage (km)
300
0
0
0
Materials DescriptionSample Bags, Tags S Markers
Hose
Paper, Photocopies, Binding materials
ivlaieriais consumed (S)
2
10
5
Value S
45
72
72
20
500
Page 1 Bennet.xls
ONTMUO MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES
Transaction No: W0280.00482
Recording Date: 2002-MAR-07
Approval Date: 2002-MAY-09
Work Report Summary
Status: APPROVED
Work Done from: 2000-OCT-20
to: 2001-AUG-22
Client(s):
189297
Survey Type(s):
ROSKO, PATRICK ARTHUR
METAL
Work Report Details:
Claim#
L 1202866
Perform Applied Assign ReservePerform Approve Applied Approve Assign Approve Reserve Approve Due Date
3816 3816 3816 ffo '"? "n "3816
3816 3816 3816 S816
30
30
O
30
30
30
30 2006-DEC-02
SO
External Credits:
Reserve:
SO
30 Reserve of Work Report*: W0280.00482
SO Total Remaining
Status of claim is based on information currently on record.
41P11SE2037 2.23196 MACMURCHY 900
2002-May-31 09:58 Armstrong-d Page 1 of 1
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Date: 2002-MAY-29
Ministere duDeveloppement du Nord et des Mines Ontario
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE 933 RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, 6th FLOOR SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E 6B5
PATRICK ARTHUR ROSKO 158 BURNSIDE DRIVE KIRKLAND LAKE, ONTARIO P2N 1M7 CANADA
Tel: (888)415-9845 Fax:(877)670-1555
Dear Sir or Madam
Submission Number: 2.23196 Transaction Number(s): W0280.00482
Subject: Approval of Assessment Work
We have approved your Assessment Work Submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached Work Report Summary indicates the results of the approval.
At the discretion of the Ministry, the assessment work performed on the mining lands noted in this work report may be subject to inspection and/or investigation at any time.
If you have any question regarding this correspondence, please contact STEVEN BENETEAU by email at [email protected] or by phone at (705) 670-5855.
Yours Sincerely,
Sheila Lessard
Acting Senior Manager, Mining Lands Section
Cc: Resident Geologist
Patrick Arthur Rosko (Claim Holder)
Assessment File Library
Patrick Arthur Rosko (Assessment Office)
Visit our website at http://www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm Page: 1 Correspondence 10:17006
H o
enH
(Oo o
1 ̂ 42397;
\' ; Uj-;tr"^-i. [i^' \, ••?"r~"Sii: 1
-,2v-* •O.L'^ T : - - ^,X ' '" "' r "iXSiv^-o - V^' '
i*^iii:: xM ; .L
MINING LAND TENURE
MAP
Date / Tiifio of Issue Mar 7 2002
TOWNSHIP l AREA
MACMURCHY
16:0611 Eastern
PLAN
Q-O 988
ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS t DIVISIONSMining Division Larder Lake
Land Tit In s; Registry Division SUDBURY
Ministry ri Natural Resources District TIMMINS
TOPOGRAPHIC LAND TENURE
aa ,^.,.,,,.-,
Thi lifoi nabuii uhnui It ritfilvnri haHn di [(Hkl Amt telain in ihu Prnrircfel Mln*|] Rwiui HMUfbl.frur rJ4jwi.lL,Kl nnfnpnlll&nnnlilj. uf Hurl Inn H nevthl|Jtndl^ an* MII l* MD l* t
General Information and Limitation*
c li MMing Hscofd*ri O Ir t* l a* mg^ikMiMIlM CimriR r^l 1(HAHH0U4unity loh*Ro*l f w i (ITT) 070 1444ry.ON P5FIB5
MfldlRail twiuro Mri WaresUfc MU Inch ding c*|i" cTwi^i.nnMtiitrijWMInriiiaM or rltinrrcrmH
trtlBptfiiia-n rrignli millntnitN-cni tfiicrnwi, Alio Eortihi tind tsnure md tai*4 Hi** thai nm Id m.f\nHan (tM Miby It tube ralnlrig tl*Ht ni-V.ndl h* HU*'*
lilt: DaLi * unite, leat kifti it w* Ion On l j* in iS Ten- c Saute: PrrwlnrJfll Mkili,0 RhmrdEr
; liWtf l BHl, -
LAND TENURE WITHDRAWALS
vt f urn Di*Ki*Hun
taiAirti lypw
-
IMPORTANT NOTICES
LAND TENURE WITHDRAWAL DESCRIPTIONS
Nov 1*20(11 itt l
hrtj w^ q M Mhtop *r- ftiO wu), Jfl-TJ
epi(4*aBB wtttriraw tick ID vtewBdiiii 11111
IS.K Mhlng Hcl R*O IWf. 2*'E
hhftmn CltHu riiBeuml u*i
U u*thd[dtMlU.:UiJ4bin| Jld Ryy nwu.^fcft'H^
Wi m w Mlh EUtW) C fck to *kiw luiifi W* i ntrMr *um ci
IMPORTANT NOTICESAt*ra nndn Mtiich ipnciil ritfiMiani. lnrNal
KdtlKg JfiVPiinc*! dflnflgpnivit KtMtwi.