Department of Mathematics and Science

Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D.District Science Supervisor

Mary Tweedy and Keisha KiddCurriculum Support Specialists

DATA ANALYSIS GRADE 5 SCIENCE SUMMER SYMPOSIUM

Data can…provide feedback on the past andprovide a basis to begin planningfor the future

What Kind of Information can Data Provide us?

Department of Mathematics and Science

IMPORTANCE OF DATA

• Facilitate a clear understanding of the gaps between where the school or class is and where it wants to be.

• Show if school or class goals and objectives are being accomplished.

• Predict and prevent failures.• Predict and ensure successes.• Establish foundation for Continuous School

Improvement/SIP.• Data drives instruction, and professional

development.

Department of Mathematics and Science

Effective Use of Classroom Data

TeachingUsingResults

Planning

StudentLearning

Assessing

Source: Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit

• GRADE 5 SCIENCE INTERIM ASSESSMENT RESULTS (2012-2013)

DATA DISAGGREGATION

Department of Mathematics and Science

Quarterly Assessment Results K-52012-2013

*Cut score for Gr 5 Winter IA= 53% satisfactory

• Quarter 1 Results

6

Grades Average Performance

Mastery/ Proficiency

Grade 5 51% **49%

Grade 4 60% 32%

Grade 3 60% 36%

Grade 2 72% 64%

Grade 1 66% 41%

Kinder 85% 76%

Grades Average Performance

Mastery/ Proficiency

Grade 5 53% *52%

Grade 4 56% 19%

Grade 3 62% 38%

Grade 2 79% 76%

Grade 1 71% 59%

Kinder 91% 93%

QUARTER 2 RESULTSQUARTER 1 RESULTS

**Cut score for Gr 5 FALL IA= 51% satisfactory

Department of Mathematics and Science

Assessment Number of Students

Average Percent Correct

Percent Proficient

Baseline 23,076 47% 6%Fall Interim 24,035 51% 49%Winter Interim 24,457 53% 52%

2012-2013 Interim Results Grade 5 Science

Assessment Average % Correct

Nature of Science 48%

Earth Space Science 57%

Physical Science 56%Life Science 49%

2013 Winter Interim Results by Question Group

Department of Mathematics and Science

Debriefing Protocol

• Teacher’s debriefing protocol

• Grade Level Debriefing Protocol

• Sample Data Chats form• Student Name and ID ____________________• Math FCAT: Achiev. Level _____ DSS ______• Reading FCAT: Achiev. Level _____ DSS _____• Science Assessment data:• Baseline: _____ Monthly ____ Fall IA ______• Winter IA _____ Post-Test ______• Student Goals:_______________________• Teacher Comment_________________

Data Chats

Department of Mathematics and Science

• Grade 5 Science Interim cut scores are based on statistical regression analysis between students performance on Interim Assessment and scale scores on 2012 FCAT 2.0:

• Fall IA satisfactory cut score: 51% or higher• Winter IA satisfactory cut score: 53% or higher• (Cut Scores)

Gr. 5 Science Interims Cut Scores

Department of Mathematics and Science

• DOE Report on Gr. 5 Science Content Focus from 2013 FCAT 2.0

Grade 5 Science Content Focus (FCAT 2.0 2013)

Department of Mathematics and Science

FCAT 2.0 Content Focus AnalysisBenchmarks Content Focus 2012 2013

Reporting Category 1. Nature of Science

SC.5.N.1.1 Defending conclusions; Identifying a control group 3 4

SC.5.N.2.1 Explanations based on evidence; Identifying empirical evidence;Importance of observations

4 3

SC.5.N.2.2 Importance of repeated trials; Reasons for differences in data 3 3

Reporting Category Point Total 10 10

Reporting Category 2. Earth and Space ScienceSC.4.E.5.4 Appearance of stars; Appearance of the Moon; Earth's revolution 2 3

SC.4.E.6.2 Classifying rocks 1 1SC.4.E.6.3 Florida resources; Renewable v. nonrenewable resources 1 3

SC.4.E.6.4 Weathering—ice 1 1SC.5.E.5.1 Components of a galaxy; Energy from stars; Star brightness; Star brightness

and distance1 4

SC.5.E.5.3 Distinguishing between inner and outer planets; Planet characteristics 2 2

SC.5.E.7.1 Water cycle—states of matter 4 1

SC.5.E.7.3 Weather—humidity 4 1

Reporting Category Point Total 16 16

FCAT 2.0 Content Focus Analysis cont’d…….Benchmarks Content Focus 2012 2013

Reporting Category 3. Physical Science

SC.5.P.8.1 Comparing objects—volume 3 1

SC.5.P.8.3 Dissolving—stirring 2 1

SC.5.P.9.1 Identifying chemical change 1 1

SC.5.P.10.1 Heat energy produced by friction; How light travels; Light behavior refraction; Mechanical energy

3 4

SC.5.P.10.2 Energy causing a change; Energy causing motion 1 2

SC.5.P.10.4 Converting electric energy to light energy; Electric circuits; Neutral objects attracted to charged objects

3 3

SC.5.P.13.1 Forces—friction; Forces—magnetic 2 2

SC.5.P.13.2 Force and motion relationships; Speed 1 2

Reporting Category Point Total 16 16

Department of Mathematics and Science

FCAT 2.0 Content Focus Analysis cont’d…Benchmarks Content Focus 2012 2013

Reporting Category 4. Life Science

SC.3.L.14.1 Germination; Plant structures; Seed dispersal 3 4

SC.4.L.16.4 Comparing insect life cycles 1 1

SC.4.L.17.3 Energy flow through a food chain; Producers 1 2

SC.5.L.14.1 Organ functions—intestines 1 1

SC.5.L.14.2 Animal classification—invertebrates; Animal classification—vertebrates; Comparing animal structures; Comparing plant and animal structures; Plant classification—flowering plants

4 5

SC.5.L.17.1 Behavioral adaptations 3 1

Reporting Category Point Total 16 14

The Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) benchmarks and content foci assessed on the 2013 FCAT 2.0 assessment are not predictive of future FCAT 2.0 content.Content Focus Reports should not be used to make decisions about instruction at the individual student level

Department of Mathematics and Science

• Scale Score for Each Achievement Level (140-260)

Gr. 5 Science FCAT 2.0

Department of Mathematics and Science

• Grade 5 Science FCAT 2.0 Achievement Level Descriptions

Gr. 5 Science FCAT 2.0

Department of Mathematics and Science

FCAT Science - Grade 5

Year Total Students Tested

% Levels 3-5

Physical/Chemical Earth/Space Life/Environmental Scientific Thinking

Possible Points

Avg. % Correct

Possible Points

Avg. % Correct Possible Points Avg. % Correct Possible

PointsAvg. % Correct

2013 25,560 51 16 63% 16 75% 14 71% 10 60%

2012 26,208 49 16 63% 16 69% 14 71% 10 70%

2011 26,422 49 13 69% 11 64% 13 69% 14 64%

2010 26,367 44 14 64% 10 70% 13 62% 14 57%

2009 25,801 42 12 58% 13 54% 13 62% 13 54%

2008 25,875 39 12 58% 14 50% 13 62% 12 58%

2007 25,993 34 12 50% 15 47% 12 50% 12 50%

GRADE 5 SCIENCE FCAT RESULTS 2007-2011 DISTRICT LEVEL

Performance by Reporting Categories (Gr 5 Science FCAT) 2012-2013 (Retro)

Nature of Science

Earth and Space

Physical Science

Life Science0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80 70% 69%63%

71%60%

75%

63%71%

FCAT 2012FCAT 2013

Reporting Categories

PERC

ENT

(%)

Performance by achievement levels (Gr 5 Science FCAT 2012-13)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 50

5

10

15

20

25

3025% 25%

27%

12% 11%

24% 24%26%

12%13%

FCAT 2012FCAT 2013

Achievement Levels

PERCENT (%)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

34%39% 42% 44%

49% 49% 51%

Grade 5 Science FCAT Results 2007-2013 (District) (2012 and 2013 FCAT 2.0) (Levels 3-5))

YEARS

PERC

ENT

(%)

Grade 5 FCAT Science Comparative Results for MDCPS, State, Broward & Palm Beach (2012-2013)

State MDCPS BROWARD PALM BEACH0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

52%49% 50%

56%53% 51%49%

60%

20122013

State and South Florida Counties

PERC

ENT

(%)

• Actionable Data by Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit http://osi.dadeschools.net/actiondata/-School Performance Data, FCAT, Baseline and Interims http://oada.dadeschools.net

http://curriculum.dadeschools.net

Data Online Resources