64
Aquaculture/Shrimp Farming Its meaning, Impact on Surrounding Ecosystems, Pitfalls and Models Ariel Zajdband MIIS December 3 2012

Miis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Miis

Aquaculture/Shrimp Farming

Its meaning, Impact on Surrounding Ecosystems, Pitfalls and Models

Ariel Zajdband

MIISDecember 3 2012

Page 2: Miis

aquaculture

Page 3: Miis

Costa-Pierce 2006

Tomb of Thebaine (Egypt)

Page 4: Miis

World capture fisheries and aquaculture production

FAO 2012

Page 5: Miis

Distribution of aquaculture production

World Fish Center 2011

Page 6: Miis

Shrimp aquaculture production

Page 7: Miis

Shrimp imports

Page 8: Miis

Conventional shrimp farm

Page 9: Miis

Global mangrove distribution

Siikamäki et al. 2012

Page 10: Miis

Global mangrove distribution

Kuenzer et al. 2011

Page 11: Miis

Giri et al. 2008

Mangrove deforestation in Ayeyarwady Delta, Burma

Page 12: Miis

Giri et al. 2008

Causes of mangrove deforestation by country

Page 13: Miis

Sundarbans, India and Bangladesh

Page 14: Miis

Pichavaram, India

Page 15: Miis

Pichavaram, India

Page 16: Miis

Bahia de Jiquilisco, El Salvador

Page 17: Miis

Bahia de Jiquilisco, El Salvador

Page 18: Miis

environmental impacts

Page 19: Miis

Carbon footprint per kg of protein

Nijdam et al. 2012

Page 20: Miis

‘Fishmeal trap’

Tacon & Metian 2008

Page 21: Miis

Tacon & Metian 2008

‘Fishmeal trap’

Page 22: Miis

‘Fishmeal trap’

Page 23: Miis
Page 24: Miis
Page 25: Miis

Ecosystem services

Adapted from MEA (2005)

Page 26: Miis

Total economic value of mangrove ecosystem

Barbier (1991)

Page 27: Miis

Long-term C sequestration

Mcleod et al 2011

Page 28: Miis

Non-linear effects of mangrove cover

Barbier et al 2008

Page 29: Miis

Protection against coastal disasters

Das and Vincent 2009

Page 30: Miis

Shrimp farm effluents

Molnar et al. 2012

Page 31: Miis

Shrimp farm effluents

Molnar et al. 2012

Page 32: Miis

Sediment deposition around mangrove trees

Primavera et al 2011

Page 33: Miis

Sediment deposition around mangrove trees

Primavera et al 2011

Page 34: Miis

Bird numbers by season in four types of habitats

Zou et al 2006

Page 35: Miis

Antibiotic concentrations in aquatic ecosystems

Thuy et al 2011

Page 36: Miis

social impacts

Page 37: Miis

Coping strategies for shrimp diseases

Mills et al 2011

Page 38: Miis

Net emergy flows and trade between shrimp farmers inthe Sri Lankan coastal zone and the global North

Bergquist 2008

Page 39: Miis

Bergquist 2008

Page 40: Miis

proposed solutions (?)

Page 41: Miis

Shrimp+red tilapia polyculture

Yuan et al 2010

Page 42: Miis

Shrimp+red tilapia polyculture

Yuan et al 2010

Page 43: Miis

closed recirculating systems

Klinger & Naylor 2012

Page 44: Miis

Gebhardt et al. 2012

Integrated shrimp-mangrove systems

Page 45: Miis

Gebhardt et al. 2012

Land use cover Ca Mau, Vietnam (2000-2010)

Page 46: Miis

Land use cover Ca Mau, Vietnam (2010)

Gebhardt et al. 2012

Page 47: Miis

Macrobrachium amazonicum (native species)

Page 48: Miis

Macrobrachium amazonicum (native species)

Page 49: Miis

food sovereignty(a new paradigm)

Page 50: Miis

1. Focuses on Food for People2. Values Food Providers3. Localizes Food Systems4. Puts Control Locally5. Builds Knowledge and Skills.6. Works with Nature

food sovereignty(principles)

Page 51: Miis

Misiones, Argentina

Page 52: Miis
Page 53: Miis
Page 54: Miis
Page 55: Miis
Page 56: Miis
Page 57: Miis
Page 58: Miis

Cluster 2. Forestry-livestock-based farms

Cluster 1. Perennial crops-based farms

Cluster 3. Tobacco-based farms

WEA

LTH

+

-

In which kind of farm is aquaculture beingintroduced?

Page 59: Miis

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Pro

du

ctio

n(k

g)

Area (m2)

Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

Production by farm cluster (n=45)

Page 60: Miis

0 50 100 150 200

cluster 1

cluster 2

cluster 3

self-consumption (kg)

gift (kg)

sold (kg)

How is aquaculture contributing to income generation and fish supply for rural markets/self-consumption?

Destination of fish production (kg) x cluster

self-consumption (kg) gift (kg) sold (kg)

mean sd mean sd mean sd

cluster 1 93,10 17,43 11,19 8,05 67,62 76,35

cluster 2 77,00 15,85 22,00 10,85 82,50 104,86

cluster 3 72,14 16,84 8,57 7,70 31,61 106,85

Significative differences

Page 61: Miis

0 100 200 300 400 500

1

2

3

self-consumption (kg)

gift (kg)

sold (kg)

n harvested

ponds self-consumption (kg) gift (kg) sold (kg) farms ponds

mean SD mean SD Mean SD

1 84,87 19,12 12,10 8,67 37,24 47,04 38 38

2 73 19,23 9 7,42 208 24,90 5 10

3 72,5 17,68 35 14,14 337,5 53,03 2 6

How is aquaculture contributing to income generation and fish supply for rural markets/self-consumption?

Destination of fish production (kg) x # ponds

Significative differences

Page 62: Miis

Who is benefiting the most from aquaculturedevelopment?

Aquaculture development programs: segmentedor not?

How can we distribute fish so it can be accessedby the poor?

Some questions and challenges…

Page 63: Miis

QUESTIONS?

anwers?

Page 64: Miis

Thank you

Ariel [email protected]

and

HAPPY FESTIVUS!