Miguel Angel Teves, A089 627 272 (BIA July 1, 2014)

8/12/2019 Miguel Angel Teves, A089 627 272 (BIA July 1, 2014)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/miguel-angel-teves-a089-627-272-bia-july-1-2014 1/6

Lee, Mark Esq.Jaime Barron P C12240 Inwood Road Suite 300Daas TX 75224

Name: TVES, MIGUEL ANGEL

Executive Oce r Imigration Review

Board of Immigraton ApealsOce of he Clrk

517 Leesburg Pike, St al Chch Vna 23

OHS/IC ice of Che Counsel - DAL125 E. Jon Capente Fwy Ste 500Iing, X 750622324

A 089-67-27

Date o tis notice 7/204

Enlosed is a opy of the Board's decision and order in te above-rereced ase.

Encosre

b:y Wd d

Sincerey,

D Ct

Dona CaChef Cek

LlU: k

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Miguel Angel Teves, A089 627 272 (BIA July 1, 2014)



US partmnt JusticExecutive Oc r Imgaon Rvw

F Churc, Virinia 253

Fie A08 62 2 Daas TX

n re MIGE GE TEVE

REMOVAL PROCEEDING

APPEA

ON BEHAF OF RPONDENT Mrk Lee Esqure

ON BHLF OF DH Mary Agneossist Chie Counse

CHRGE

Decsion of e Board of iaion Appals

Date 'JL -1 204

Notice: ec. 212( a )( 6)( A)( i) &N Act [8 U.C. § 1182( a )( 6)( )( )] Present without beng admted or poed

APPLCATON Reopening and remad

The respondent a nate and citzen o Peu h appeaed m an Immgration Judge'sMch 5 2012 decision denying the respondent's motion to recnsder The Depent oHomed ecui ( DH") has ed a response in oppositon to the respondents moton treconsder The record w be remanded r er proceedings

This cse was t bere n December 20 200 when we acated the ImmigranJudge's decision d remded the record r er proceedings d r e eny of a newdecision Upon remd n a Februay 6 202 decision the Immatn udge issued ordergtig e respondent pre-cncusion outary depue under section 240B( a ) o eImmato d Nationaity Act. On Mch 2 2012 e respondent ed a motion to wdraws ouy depe request d a motion to reconsider stating that e had withdawn hisadjusent o stas appicaton and accepted the Immigraon udge's oer of ountydepe becase at the mer hearing the mmiation udge was requring h to submit anew medca exination d woud not ant contnunce He gued n hs motion at ereguations do not require m to submit updated medica exmination because he had aready

submted one ang w the nita ng o hs adjustment o status appication He argued at the reguations ony require a new medical exination r appicats who entered ete tas as a non spus or of a Ud taes n r hechd o en" d oy if the appicnt had not been exned as a conditon of btaining enonimmt sa wthn ye of the date o the adustment appcation ee 8 CF.R. § 2455

The mmiaton udge deied e respondent's motion t recnsder stating at pusut to8 CFR § 245.5 the respondent is requird to hae cuent medca exm competed wthn yer of the appicatio. the mmaton Judge hed at e respondent hd notproded a crent medic exam d s sttutory negbe r adusent o status.




I '

089 627 272

e espondent argues on appeal at the Imigation Jdge ee in eqing an updatedmedical exination bause he ad aready subied one aong w e initia ling of hisadjusent of status applicaton He gues at unde he regulaions, he was not eued tosb a new meic exnation d hat it was eo the Imigraion Juge to equie him to do so or accet oder of depoaon o volnty depe

e reor shows at te espondent ed a apliation r adsent of stas wi eDHS on Noveme 2, 2006, d he DHS denie he appiation on Febay 26, 2007. Noice o ppe was issue, d th respondent renewed his application adjusent of stasbe he Immiation uge, ing updated appiaton wih the Imiaion Cou onuy 3, 2008, d p 25, 201 ( E 3) Te esponent, howeve, dd not e pdateo I3 medica exinaion oment, d insead reied on the medical exnaon thatws subied with hs inital appliation

We aee wi the espondent that he reglation does not sppor the Imiation Judgesnding hat he was reqied to sbit a cuent edical examination. By its tes, the setion

of he eguaion stating provid at th medica exmnation must hav oced not moreh 1 ye pior the [sic] date of apiation adjstment of stats" appies ony to applictswho enteed he Unied States a nonimmigant spouse, , or ce of a nited Staesitize or the chid of n aien" ee 8 CFR § 12455

We note that, n dening e sope of the eguation, ite Sttes Citizenship dImation Seies SCIS) has issued meoda stating that, whie he Fom I-63 edicaex repo is nomally valid r 1 ye om the date of he cvil sugeons sgnaue, t wouldextend the validity of e ivil sgeon endosement beyond the 1-yea teshod r puoses ofadjustment of status appliations The policy meoranda expln that whee unexpiedmedica exination denong no Cass or B mei condition s led wh adjsment

appication, hat media ex wl eain vaid until the asent application is timateyadjuicated ee eg., Policy Memordum, xtension of Valdiy of Medica Ceicaios onFo I693 Sept 4, 203) vad ntil May 31, 204) ight of this poicy d in e absenceof any Clss o B medical conditions, we aso conclude that it s inappopate r heImmgaon Jdge to cit e regulation as a basis r ning the espondent sautoilyineligible r adjusment of stats. Fuhe, s the respondent indiates, he led a medical examwith is inii appication r adusment of stts ner e poicy in eec a he im of theImmgation Jdges decision, e edica exm ed wih te 485 w stil vai untadudication of he adjstment appiation. s, we nd that e Imigration Juge eed inpreteing the espondents ajusent application.

Howeve, on June , 204, SCIS evise its poliy to state hat the meiexanation epo must be submited to USCIS less 1 ye e copetion oe exaton, d enet applcaton must e audate no more 1 yeaer the date the medical exination repo was sbmied to USCIS eeh:// .scis.gov/policyanualHTMLoicMul-Voume8ParB-Chapt r4h hisnew policy was not in eet at he tie of te Immigration Jdges decision. However, given at SCIS has chaged its policy eective June 1, 2014, to apply to ay Fo I693 sppoinga enet applicaon addcated on or aer at date, we nd it appoprat to re e record to he mmigation Jdge to set a new, prospective deadlne r he respondent to sumit

2




I r

8 627 272

upte meal eamnaton to auate the esponents applaton astment ofsta whn e e the ate e meal examnaton s submtte USIS Poly le,P04-00 ay 30, 04)

ogly e llwng oe s entee

RDER: he e s eme he poeengs onsstent w the egongopinion a e enty of a new eison




AIM BARRON P.C.

LEE, MK

�I ,

ITED SATES DEPMEN OF JUSCE

EXECUIE OFFCE FOR MMIGRAON REVEW

IMMGTON COUR

110 COMMERCE S., ROOM 404

DS X 75242

224 IOOD RO SE. 3

DALAS T 75244

IN HE ER OF

EE MIUEL G

FE A 89-627272 DAE Mar 2 22

ABLE O FORWD NO DRESS ROVIDED

ATACHED IS A COPY OF HE DECS ION OF THE IMMIGON GE. S DECSION

S FN ESS APE S FIED WIH HE BOD OF IMMGON APPES

WTHIN 30 CLED DAS OF THE DAE OF THE ING OF HS WREN DECSION

SEE HE ENCLOSED FORMS A NSRUCTIONS FOR PROPERLY PREPIN YO E

YOR NOTICE OF APPA CHED DOCUMS A FEE OR FEE WAER �QUS,MS E LED O BOARD OF IMMGON PPEALS ·� :

OFFCE OF HE CER � :P . 0 . OX 85 3 , ;m -

oo FLLS CHRCH, VA 22041 0

z: N 0 ATTACHED IS A COP OF HE DECISON OF HE MMIG ION E AS

S�

�

OF YOUR FAIE O APPEAR YOUR SCHEDED DEPORON ORREMO HEr

G

HS DECSON S FNA ESS A MOON TO REOPN IS FIED NAC

C WH SECTON 242B(c)(3) OF HE IGON A NAONL AC, i'S.C.w

SECION 252B(c) (3) N DEORION PROCEEDINGS OR SECTON 240(c)(6), N

8 US.C. SECON 229a(c)(6) N REMOV PROCEEDNS F YOU FLE A MOON

O REOEN, YOUR MOION S BE FIED WTH HIS COUR:

_ OHER

MMGON CO

0 COERCE S ROOM 44

DAL, X 7524 ·

GE'S DECISION - MOTION TO RECONSIDER & STAY (DI)

MON CO

CC ANELO M F.

25 E. HW 14 STE 50

IRVING TX 7562

FF



.

· �

.S DEPTT OF STCEEXECTIVE OFFCE FOR GTO REEW

GTO COT·1100COERE S� RO 40· ·

_D X . 7242 »

; . ":·In th e · M a�-d � -.;_ ;

TEVES IGL ELDocket: DS, TEXAS

RESPONDENT REOL PROCEEDGS

ORDER OF THE GTO GE 0r f c >

< - ; 3 : ZnUpon consideration of RESPOT -n � · c -

• _� , · - ; · � . \· ·F :. :�o· . ; i. �

:

��o l %

.

-"f1 Motion to Reconsid er an Imigration Judge's decisio - N Oo0

. � x

Motion to Reopen roceedings 0�

C f l(c ( " < tr C �"-

filed in the a bove entitled matter, t is here by ordered tat � moti� UIN

THS DOTO [ ]DATE

For E .

2 7 2T

' : �

':\ '

·

Documents

Miguel Angel Teves, A089 627 272 (BIA July 1, 2014)