Midterm Examination in Campus Journalism

8/19/2019 Midterm Examination in Campus Journalism

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/midterm-examination-in-campus-journalism 1/6

Mindoro State College Main Campus Bongabong CampusCalapan City Campus

of Agriculture and Alcate, Victoria Labasan, Bongabong Masipit,Calapan City

Technology e-mail address: [email protected]

Midterm Examination in Literary CriticismBachelor of Secondary 1ducation - 1nglish

2ear 333MR. CEDRIC M. RAYLA14563S7 34ST89CTO8

4ame: ate: Score: ;)""DIRECTIONS 8ead the <uestions and consider the options carefully$ 9se the ans=er sheet pro>ided$ Shade the

appropriate brac?et neatly$ 1rasures are strongly discouraged$ 9se !LAC" IN" only$ #enci$ is NOTALLO%ED during the e amination$

Test I. M&$ti'$e ChoiceCo(era)e An O(er(ie* o+ Literary Theory and Criticism

• Background of Literary Theory and Criticism• Theory as Discipline The relationship between the Literary Critic and the Writer

)$ According to him, prior to the !"th

century, the in>estigation of the nature and >alue had had a long anddistinguished history, beginning =ith #lato and Aristotle and continuing into modern times$ @ho is hea$ Matthe= Arnoldb$ Samuel Taylorc$ Sir #hilip Sydneyd$ elly 5ri th

!$ DThe history of literature is the history of literary criticism$Ea$ Fide Balogunb$ elly 5ri thc$ Tyson 6oisd$ Terry 1agleton

'$ This literary critic argues that theory is a body of ideas and methods used in the practical reading of literature$ or him, theories re>eal =hat literature can mean$ @ho is hea$ Tyson 6oisb$ Terry 1agletonc$ elly 5ri thd$ Fide Balogun

0$ According to him, there are some students =ho complain that literary theory is impossibly esotericG =hosuspect it arcane, elitist encla>e some=hat a?in to nuclear physics$ @ho is hea$ Terry 1agletonb$ Tyson 6oisc$ Fide Balogund$ elly 5ri th

$ 7e deHnes literary theory generally as the Dsystematic account of the nature of literature and of themethods for analyIing itE$ @ho is hea$ 5erald 5raJ b$ 5raham 7oughc$ Fonathan Cullerd$ M$ 7$ Abraham

&$ 3n his boo?, An 1ssay on Criticism .)((&/,KKKKKKKKKKK distinguishes t=o categories of literary theories$ The Hrst category he calls the e trinsic theories and the secondary theory is the intrinsic theories$a$ M$ 7$ Abrahamb$ 5erald 5raJ c$ Fonathan Cullerd$ 5raham 7ough

*$ This ?ind of literary theory isolates a =or? of literature from its e ternal reality$a$ 1 trinsic moti>ationb$ 3ntrinsic moti>ationc$ 3ntrinsic theoriesd$ 1 trinsic theories

+$ These theories tal? about the formal nature of literature and more speciHcally =hat it is$a$ 1 trinsic moti>ationb$ 3ntrinsic moti>ationc$ 3ntrinsic theories

d$ 1 trinsic theories($ 3t is a body of rules or principles used to appraise =or?s of literature$

a$ 6iterary theoryb$ Theoryc$ 6iteratured$ Criticism

)"$ 3t tries to e plain the assumptions and >alues upon =hich >arious forms of literary criticism rest$a$ 6iterary Theoryb$ Theoryc$ 6iteratured$ Criticism

mailto:[email protected]







))$ 3n The Mirror and the 6amp .)( '/ KKKKKKKKKK points out that D any reasonably ade<uate theory ta?essome account of four elements$E These elements are: the =or? itself, the artist =ho creates the =or?,the uni>erse or the nature that is being imitated by the =or? and the audience of =or?$

a$ M$ 7$ Abrahamb$ Fonathan Cullerc$ elly 5ri thd$ Tyson 6ois

)!$ 3t refers to the analysis and Ludgment of =or?s of literature$ 3t tries to interpret speciHc =or?s of literature and also helps us to identify and understand diJerent =ays of e amining and interpretingthem$a$ 6iterary 3nterpretationb$ 6iterary Criticismc$ 6iterary Theoryd$ Critical Theory

)'$ 3n his 6iterary Theory: A >ery Short 3ntroduction, KKKKKKKK holds that theory in literature refers to theprinciples deri>ed from internal analysis of te ts or from ?no=ledge e ternal to the te t that can beapplied in multiple interpreti>e situations$a$ M$7$ Abrahamb$ elly 5ri thc$ Fonathan Cullerd$ 5raham 7ough

)0$ KKKKKKK contends that the tas? of resol>ing the crisis engendered in literary te ts is possible through theformulation of some principles, parameters and paradigms =hich are technically termed theories$a$ Foseph Conradb$ Fide Balogunc$ M$7$ Abrahamd$ 5raham 7ough

) $ KKKKKKK means all things of the =orld apart from the audience$a$ #ragmatic theoriesb$ 9ni>ersec$ 1 pressi>e theoriesd$ ObLecti>e

)&$ These theories are interested in the relationship bet=een te t and audience$a$ #ragmatic theoriesb$ 1 pressi>e theoriesc$ ObLecti>e theoriesd$ Mimetic theories

)*$ These theories are concerned =ith the te t- author relationship$a$ #ragmatic theoriesb$ 1 pressi>e theoriesc$ ObLecti>e theoriesd$ Mimetic theories

)+$ These theories focus on analysis of the te t in isolation$a$ #ragmatic theoriesb$ 1 pressi>e theoriesc$ ObLecti>e theoriesd$ Mimetic theories

)($ These theories focus on the relationship bet=een te t and uni>erse$a$ #ragmatic theoriesb$ 1 pressi>e theoriesc$ ObLecti>e theoriesd$ Mimetic theories

!"$ KKKKKKKK, by at large, tries to e plain the literary =or? to us: its meaning, its design, its production, itsbeauty$a$ 6iterary interpretationb$ 6iterary criticismc$ 6iterary samplesd$ 6iterary genres

!)$ @riting on the role of literary criticism, KKKKKKKK notes that Dthe critical reading of poetry .prose anddrama/ is an ardors discipline$ The lesson of all criticism is that =e ha>e nothing to rely upon in ma?ingour choices, but oursel>es$Ea$ 3$A$ 8ichardsb$ Fonathan Cullerc$ 5raham 7oughd$ elly 5ri th

!!$ The KKKKKKKKK is concerned =ith =hat the =riter has tried to say in his =or? and ho= successful he hasbeen able to e press it$ or instance, the formalist critic is interested in how an author e presses anidea, =hile the Mar ist critic is interested in what an author is trying to e press$a$ 6iterary criticismb$ 6iterary interpretationc$ 6iterary criticd$ 6iterary =riter








!'$ 3n the preface to A History of Literary Criticism .)(()/, KKKKKKK gi>es no room for any doubt about the?inship of literature, literary criticism and literary theories$ 7e says:The study of literature requires knowledge of conte ts as well as of te ts! What kind of person wrote the

poem" the play" the no#el" the essay$ What forces acted upon them as they wrote! What was thehistorical" the political" the philosophical" the economic" the cultural background" etc$a$ 3$A$ 8ichardsb$ A$4$ FeJaresc$ M$7$ Abrahamd$ 4VM 5onIales

!0$ ! $ 6iterary criticism Nourished in 1urope and America =ith such literary giants li?e KKKKKKK and KKKKKK as the fore-runners$ 1>en in contemporary criticism, both men are still >ery much recogniIed andrespected$ 3n fact, they =ere the theoreticians of literature for se>eral decades$ They =ere the doyens of critical thought in 1urope and America$a$ M$7$ Abraham and A$4$ FeJaresb$ #lato and Aristotlec$ 3$A$ 8ichards and $8$ 6ea>isd$ elly 5ri th and 5raham 7ough

! $ 3t tries to e plain the assumptions and >alues upon =hich >arious forms of literary criticism rest$a$ 6iterary Theoryb$ Theoryc$ 6iteratured$ Criticism

TEST IICo(era)e Theories o+ Literat&re ,

Mimetic Theory of Artsormalist Theory of Criticism

)$ KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

Midterm Examination in Literary Criticism








Bachelor of Secondary 1ducation - 1nglish 2ear 333

MR. CEDRIC M. RAYLA14563S7 34ST89CTO8

4ame: ate: Score: ;)""

Test I and Test II STRICTLY NO ERAS-RES TEST III

A ! C D E

,. / / / / / ,._________________________________

0. / / / / / 0._________________________________

1. / / / / / 1._________________________________

2. / / / / / 2._________________________________3. / / / / / 3.

_________________________________4. / / / / / 4.

_________________________________5. / / / / / 5.

_________________________________6. / / / / / 6.

_________________________________7. / / / / / 7.

_________________________________,8. / / / / / ,8.

_________________________________,,. / / / / /,0. / / / / /

,1. / / / / /,2. / / / / /,3. / / / / /,4. / / / / /,5. / / / / /,6. / / / / /,7. / / / / /08. / / / / /0,. / / / / /00. / / / / /

01. / / / / /02. / / / / /03. / / / / /04. / / / / /05. / / / / /06. / / / / /

07. / / / / /18. / / / / /1,. / / / / /10. / / / / /11. / / / / /12. / / / / /13. / / / / /14. / / / / /15. / / / / /16. / / / / /17. / / / / /28. / / / / /2,. / / / / /20. / / / / /

Chec9ed :y _____________________; Date _______








A Narrative Report in

5th Regional and 1 st International Philippine Association for Teachers and Educators (PAFTE) IB B Pre serviceand In service Teachers !onvention"

Divine Word College of CalapanCalapan City, Oriental Mindoro

January 22- 23, 2016

Aiming to e uip our!elve! "it# dependa$le and updated %ompeten%ie! t#at "ill furt#er ena$le u! to develop and produ%e adept and e&perien%ed tea%#er! in t#e future, "e attended t#e ' t# (egional and 1 !t )nternational *#ilippineA!!o%iation for +ea%#er! and du%ator! *A.+ / ) - *re- !ervi%e and )n- !ervi%e +ea%#er! Convention at DivineWord College of Calapan in Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro, January 22- 23, 2016

i& fa%ulty mem$er! and a !%#ool nur!e from Min CA+ onga$ong Campu! "ere advi!ed to attend in t#e !aid%onvention and t#ey "ere Mr! Myla )4on, Mr rian laydo,Mr Cedri% M (ayla,M! Mari%el arredo, M! 5orieJane (ey, Mr!, Janet# 5inga and Mr! Dap#ne Mer%ado, t#e offi%ial medi%al attendant of t#e M C delegation

Mr! )4on $eing one of t#e offi%er! of t#e *A.+ organi4ation and Mr laydo, t#e ead of Art! and %ien%e! led t#edelegation on January 22, .riday at 6730 pm Ot#er fa%ulty delegate! "ere de!ignated in every van to loo8 after t#e!tudent!

*rior to t#e !aid travel, ea%# fa%ulty "a! given li!t of !tudent! "#o "ill $e under t#eir !upervi!ion "#ile travelling tot#e venue And t#e !aid !trategy "a! effe%tively u!ed !in%e no fa%ulty- advi!er reported any %a!e of mi& up

After an #our or t"o, t#e M C delegation rea%#ed t#e pla%e at e&a%tly 9730 +#e delegation "a! "el%omed $y t#e $ra!! $and of t#e #o!t !%#ool

At 1pm, t#e program !tarted "it# a %ommunity ma!! offi%iated $y t#e prie!t! from DWCC After"ard!, t#e offi%ialopening "a! #eld a%# delegation "a! re%ogni4ed

Among t#e dignitarie! pre!ent "ere t#e (egional Dire%tor of C D ) - Dr irginia A8iate, Calapan City Mayor Arnan C *analigan, (ev .r Ant#ony )$arra, DWCC *re!ident, Dr 5eoni%ia Mar uine!, Min CA+ City Campu!Dire%tor for )n!tru%tion, Dr Junrey * *etere, MA M)+ Dean of A%ademi% Affair! and Dr (o!velinda De uiro!,DWCC Dean of A%ademi% Affair!

After t#e opening program t#e !erie! of tal8 and "or8!#op "a! #eld ariou! topi%! "ere di!%u!!ed

Mr and M! *A.+ %apped t#e fir!t day of t#e !aid !eminar

After t#e !aid pageant t#e delegate! #ad t#eir overnig#t !tay at Min CA+ Calapan City Campu!

On t#e ne&t day, ot#er tal8! "ere rendered $y t#e invited !pea8er! Dr Morilla tal8ed a$out (e!ear%# in du%ation and(ev :lenn *aul :ome4, DW J *re!ident tal8ed a$out pirituality and oline!!

+#e %lo!ing program #ig#lig#ted t#e ne"ly- ele%ted offi%er! of *A.+ (egion ) - and t#e a"arding and re%ognitionof t#e pa!t offi%er! and delegate!

+#e program ended at 'pm

*repared $y

!E#RI! $" RA%&A*A.+ - .a%ulty *arti%ipant










Documents

Midterm Examination in Campus Journalism