Upload
doandat
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Abstract— Radiometry is the passive measurement of the
electromagnetic radiation which is either emanated or reflected
from all materials. The energy that is received by a radiometer
from an object is due to the combination of the apparent
temperature of the object, the apparent temperatures reflected
by the object, and the apparent temperatures transmitted
through the object. Potential application areas of microwave
radiometry include geo-science, climatology, agriculture,
pollution and disaster control, detection, reconnaissance,
surveillance, and status registration in general. Passive RF
sensors can be operated on ground, airborne and in space,
requiring sophisticated techniques and technologies to save
volume and mass. In parallel, increased spatial resolution and
sensitivity, wide fields of view, and real-time capabilities are
demanded challenges. This paper gives a brief introduction to the
physical background of microwave radiometry and illustrates the
mostly considered imaging principles. Typical examples from
current practice and basic experimental measurements for future
applications are shown.
Index Terms—Microwave radiometry, fundamentals, imaging
principles, applications.
I. INTRODUCTION
ICROWAVE radiometry addresses the domain of
passive measurement of the natural thermally caused
electromagnetic radiation of matter at a physical temperature
above 0K. In the case of Earth observation significant
contrasts can be observed between reflective and absorbing
materials due to the impact of reflected sky radiation of
cosmic origin. For Earth observation, an approximate
brightness temperature range from 3K to more than 300K can
be observed. In the microwave region the spatial two-
dimensional brightness temperature distribution can be used as
a daytime and almost weather independent indicator for many
different physical phenomena. Hence, interesting application
areas incorporate geo science, climatology, agriculture,
pollution and disaster control, detection, reconnaissance,
surveillance, and status registration in general. Since a few
years security applications like personnel screening and the
monitoring of critical infrastructures are also of major interest.
Many of those applications require high spatial and
M. Peichl is with the Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR),
Microwaves and Radar Institute (HR), Oberpaffenhofen, 82234 Wessling,
Germany (phone: +49-8153-282390; fax: +49-8153-281135; e-mail:
All the other authors are also with HR, DLR, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.
radiometric resolution, high precision, large fields of view,
and high frame rates.
Today three radiometric imaging methods are mainly
considered. A first more classical one is based on a
linescanner approach, a second more innovative method called
aperture synthesis uses interferometric techniques, and a third
principle uses a focal plane array and a focusing aperture as in
many optical systems. All methods have certain benefits
concerning performance, expense, and costs. Hence, they are
used depending on the requirements and the application.
II. BASIC PRINCIPLES OF MICROWAVE RADIOMETRY
A. Brightness temperature
In the microwave region, we mostly measure the noise
power instead of voltage or current and therefore a microwave
radiometer can be characterized as a low-noise highly
amplifying frequency-selective power meter. At microwave
frequencies the noise power is proportional to the physical
temperature of either an electronic resistor following
Nyquist’s law, or of thermally radiating matter following the
Rayleigh-Jeans law, where the resistor can be considered as a
lossless receiving antenna in a thermal equilibrium. In the
second case the received radiation has not to be generated
exclusively by the observed matter due to emission as in the
case of a blackbody, but it can be composed of additional
partly reflected and partly translucent radiation generated in
the same manner elsewhere. Consequently the observed
temperature is apparent and does in general not correspond to
the physical temperature T0. It is called the brightness
temperature TB and its composition is illustrated strongly
simplified in fig. 1.
TE
TE
TG
TG
T0
T0
TB = eT0 + rTE + tTG
T0, e, r, t
Observed object
Radiometer
Environment
Background
Energy conservation:
e + r + t = 1 e = a
e Emissivitya Absorptivity r Reflectivity t Transmissivity
Fig. 1. Composition of the observable brightness temperature.
Microwave Radiometry - Imaging Technologies
and Applications
M. Peichl, S. Dill, M. Jirousek, and H. Süß
M
75 Proceedings of WFMN07, Chemnitz, Germany
WFMN07_II_C1, pp. 75-83 http://archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/2007/0210/
The chemical and physical properties of matter like the
permittivity, surface roughness, and shape of an object, and
the measurement parameters like frequency, polarization, and
viewing angle are mathematically incorporated in the
quantities of emissivity e, reflectivity r and transmissivity t.
For many materials and especially in the millimetre-wave
(MMW) region the penetration depth of electromagnetic
waves is very low and their transmissivity is close to zero.
Differences in emissivity and consequently in reflectivity
allow the discrimination of objects among one another and
from the background.
B. Sky brightness temperature
In the case of Earth observation significant contrasts can be
observed between reflective and absorbing materials due to
the impact of reflected sky radiation of cosmic origin. The
space outside the terrestrial atmosphere acts like a blackbody
radiator having a physical temperature of about 3K. This cold
appearance can be observed more or less strongly depending
on the reflective properties of an object and the frequency
dependent absorption and self-emission of the atmosphere.
The main MMW windows for sufficient atmospheric
penetration and low sky brightness temperatures as illustrated
in fig. 2 are at frequencies around 35, 94, 140 and 220GHz
and offer corresponding available bandwidths of about 16, 23,
26 and 50GHz. Out of those windows, the frequency selective
absorption and scattering of energy by the atmospheric
molecules takes place and hampers the application of MMW
imaging. However, those areas are preferred in atmospheric
research.
50 100 150 200 250 300Frequency [GHz]
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Bri
gh
tne
ss
te
mp
era
ture
[K
] = 60°
= 30°
= 0°
H2O
H2O O2
O2
Fig. 2. Calculated observable brightness temperature of the sky for different
observation angles using the US standard atmosphere model [1].
Note that the sky brightness temperature increases with
increasing observation angle due to the longer path of the
cosmic radiation through the atmosphere.
C. Antenna temperature
The observable brightness temperature of a scene depends
on the direction of observation. It can be measured by an
antenna connected to a low-noise receiver. Such a device is
called a microwave radiometer. The actual measured
brightness temperature is given by the antenna temperature
TA( ‘, ‘), which is the true brightness temperature TB( , )
of the actual pixel convolved with the antenna power pattern
P( , ), which can be a real or a synthetic beam. The
convolution represents the movement of the antenna beam in
spherical coordinates , , for which d = sin d d is
valid.
dPTT B
A
A )','(),(1
)','( (1)
Note that the antenna beam degrades the true brightness
temperature due to its finite beam width. Furthermore the
receiver adds its own noise to the observable noise power of
the scene, and the available observation time is limited
depending on the application. As a consequence the
radiometer can only measure with a finite sensitivity. Both
degrading impacts are briefly discussed next.
D. Spatial resolution
The angular resolution in degrees is determined by the
ratio of the wavelength and the aperture diameter D of the
imaging antenna, which essentially corresponds to its half-
power beam width. The constant kA depends on the field
distribution in the aperture plane of the antenna (e.g. 72° for a
dish antenna with a Gaussian edge taper down to -10 dB).
Dk A
(2)
Note that for a given wavelength the antenna size has to be
increased in order to improve the spatial resolution. There is
only very small margin by controlling the aperture field
distribution.
E. Sensitivity
The sensitivity or temperature resolution T of a single
measurement is determined by the antenna temperature TA, the
receiver noise temperature TE, the radiometer bandwidth f,
and the integration time .
f
TTkT EA
R
(3)
The constant kR depends on the receiver type and the
imaging principle used. For classical single-receiver scanning
systems it is 1 for a total-power receiver and 2 for a Dicke
receiver, where the latter is used to compensate for gain drifts
[1]. For a high sensitivity the antenna and receiver noise
temperatures have to be low and the bandwidth and the
integration time have to be large. However, the application
mostly limits the margin for the bandwidth and the integration
time due to technical or observational constraints. The antenna
temperature is given by the scene, and the receiver noise
temperature depends on the availability of low-noise receiver
components. Typically the latter gets worse with increasing
frequency band to be used for the observation.
WFMN07_II_C1, pp. 75-83 http://archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/2007/0210/
76 Proceedings of WFMN07, Chemnitz, Germany
III. IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES
Today, in principle three radiometric imaging methods are
considered. The first more classical one is based on a line
scanner approach and is relatively easy to implement. It has
strong limitations concerning real-time imaging, the spatial
resolution, and the field of view (FOV). The second more
innovative method called aperture synthesis uses
interferometric techniques. It offers higher resolution, larger
FOVs, and real-time capability at the cost of much more
expense. The third principle uses a focal plane array and a
focusing aperture as in many optical systems. Thus real-time
imaging is possible, but for present technologies high
resolution systems with larger FOVs are associated with a
high expense. For aperture synthesis and focal plane arrays the
data processing is also more complicated. However, both
techniques are subject of actual research.
A. Line scanner
Basically a line scanner radiometer system operates by
moving a real aperture antenna beam across the desired FOV,
and measuring the incident noise power by a high-amplifying
low-noise receiver as shown in fig. 3. Thus the whole two-
dimensional image is sampled consecutively in time pixel by
pixel.
Fig. 3. Operational principle of a line scanner system for airborne imaging.
Typically a line scanner operates with a single receiver.
Hence, the image generation requires two mechanical or
electronic movements of the real-aperture antenna beam. As a
consequence, a high-resolution image requires a short dwell
time of the antenna beam on each resolution cell, leading to a
rather small integration time and a corresponding decreased
temperature resolution. A low receiver noise figure and a large
bandwidth can improve this situation to some extent. Typical
sensitivities for airborne systems are around 1…2 K.
Mechanical movements are limited by a maximum size and
mass of the antenna structure due to inertia problems. Even
highly sophisticated mechanics nowadays do not allow an
angular resolution well below 0.5° at millimeter-waves like W
band, for instance. Electronic beam steering by real aperture
antennas, as in the case of a phased array, suffers mostly from
the very high number of single elements. Higher signal
attenuation causes a decreased temperature resolution. Single-
receiver line-scanner systems do not allow proper real-time
imaging.
B. Aperture synthesis
In contrast to the line scanner imaging method an aperture
synthesis radiometer operates in the spatial frequency domain
[2, 3]. The basic idea of aperture synthesis as shown in fig. 4
is to replace the large real-aperture antenna of a radiometer by
a thinned array of single small-aperture antennas and to
correlate the input signals in pairs. For an adequate placement
of the single antennas this procedure measures the relative
amplitudes and phases of the incoming radiation in
dependence of the baseline distances, the spatial frequencies,
with a minimum of redundancy. From a complete set of
spatial frequencies, called the visibility function, a
corresponding synthesized beam of the array can be
constructed in the spatial domain. Thus the brightness
temperature distribution to be determined is the convolution of
the original one with the synthesized beam and can therefore
be found by an inverse Fourier transform of the measured
spatial frequency spectrum.
Fig. 4. Airborne imaging arrangement for an aperture synthesis system
consisting of a multitude of two-element interferometers.
The initial field of view is given by the antenna pattern of
the single antenna elements. All pixels of an image are
determined at the same time without any mechanical
movement. This offers the capability of real-time operation as
in the case of an optical camera. Furthermore the
mathematical generation of the image from the spatial
frequency measurements allows a flexible operation on the
image reconstruction process using methods of digital signal
processing. In particular, an aperture synthesis system can be
adjusted for far-field as well as near-field imaging without
changing the array geometry, because the focusing can be
done purely mathematical [3]. Aperture synthesis can be
applied in one or in two dimensions. Hybrid systems
combining it with a real-aperture approach can be used in
order to save costs and expense [4].
C. Focal plane array
A focal plane array system [5] basically operates similar to
a line scanner in the spatial domain. Instead of the mechanical
or electronic steering of the antenna beam, a set of single
WFMN07_II_C1, pp. 75-83 http://archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/2007/0210/
77 Proceedings of WFMN07, Chemnitz, Germany
receivers is placed in the focal plane of a focusing aperture to
generate simultaneously a bunch of antenna beams, each one
pointing to another direction. A schematic of an airborne one-
dimensional focal plane array system is shown in fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Operational principle of a focal-plane-array system illustrated for a
one-dimensional airborne application.
The offset of each antenna within the focal plane with
respect to the focal point generates a squint for each antenna
beam. Thus the number of single receivers and their
displacement determine the actual number of image pixels and
the sampling pattern on a scene. In order to fulfill the
sampling theorem and to acquire a large field of view
simultaneously, a very large number of receivers in a very
compact arrangement would be required. Thus sometimes a
combination of a focal plane array together with some less
expensive mechanical movement of the whole imaging system
is used [6].
IV. SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS
Microwave radiometers are widely used since many
decades in space-borne, airborne, or ground-based
applications. Only a sample of missions and activities can and
shall be illustrated here.
A. Space-borne systems
In the 1990s the European Space Agency (ESA) developed
the MIMR (Multi-frequency Imaging Microwave Radiometer)
satellite. The instrument was designed to observe numerous
atmospheric and oceanic parameters, including precipitation,
soil moisture, global ice and snow cover, sea surface
temperature and wind speed, atmospheric cloud water, and
water vapor [7]. From an 824 km orbit MIMR should operate
at six frequencies, each with horizontal and vertical
polarization: 6.8, 10.65, 18.7, 23.8, 36.5, and 90 GHz. The
corresponding ground resolution should run from about 60 km
to 5 km, and the corresponding sensitivity should be in the
order of 0.25 K to 1 K. MIMR was designed to have a cross-
track swath of 1,400 km at a constant incidence angle of 50
degrees, which provided a 3-day global coverage of the Earth.
The imaging principle followed a conical scan using a dish
antenna with various feeds as illustrated in fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Imaging principle of the MIMR space-borne radiometer system
(Source: ESA-ESTEC, The Netherlands).
MIMR was designed upon the successful design of the
Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) [8]. The SSM/I
system consists of several satellites launched since 1987
measuring at 85, 37, 22, and 19GHz. The primary mission of
SSM/I was to support the American Department of Defense
operations, but the satellite system is also used for many
civilian geo-science applications. Other space-borne conical-
scan radiometer systems are TMI, GMI, SSMIS, Coriolis
WindSat, AMSR, and AMSR-E. Fig. 7 shows a satellite
brightness temperature image from Coriolis WindSat of the
typhoon Songda.
Fig. 7. Coriolis WindSat 37 GHz horizontal polarization brightness
temperature product shown for Typhoon Songda on September 4, 2004
(Source: Naval Research Lab, USA).
Aquarius is a NASA/CONAE satellite mission to measure
global Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) [9]. The Aquarius science
goals are to observe and model the processes that relate
salinity variations to climatic changes in the global cycling of
WFMN07_II_C1, pp. 75-83 http://archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/2007/0210/
78 Proceedings of WFMN07, Chemnitz, Germany
water and to understand how these variations influence the
general ocean circulation. Aquarius uses a 2.5 m reflector
antenna and three feeds for three footprints in a push-broom
configuration as shown in fig. 8. The corresponding incidence
angles and ground resolutions are 29°, 38°, 45°, and 76 x 94
km, 84 x 120 km, 96 x 156 km. A sensitivity of about 1 K for
a 6 s integration time is achieved.
Fig. 8. Artist view of the Aquarius satellite measuring with three antenna
beams simultaneously in a push-broom configuration (Source: NASA, USA).
The fully polarimetric radiometer operates in L band at
1413 MHz with a <27 MHz bandwidth, which is a protected
band for radio-astronomical measurements of the galactic
atomic hydrogen line. Additionally and L-band scatterometer
at 1.26 GHz is added for Faraday rotation correction and
retrieval algorithm improvement. The system shall be
launched in spring 2009 and have a three-year lifetime. The
swath width will be 407 km in a 657 km sun-synchronous
orbit. Fig. 9 shows a global salinity map indicating the
variability of the salinity level for the different oceans.
Fig. 9. Global map of the sea surface salinity distribution (Source: ESR,
USA).
The SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) mission [10]
currently prepared by ESA has the objective to observe two
crucial variables, soil moisture over land and ocean salinity
over sea. Both variables are used in predictive atmospheric,
oceanographic and hydrologic models and may be important
for extreme event forecasting. The SMOS radiometer system
is based on an innovative two-dimensional L-band
(1.413GHz) Y-shaped aperture synthesis design as shown in
fig. 10.
Fig. 10. Artist view of the SMOS satellite using two-dimensional aperture
synthesis imaging techniques. The antenna spacing is 0.875 wavelengths
(Source: ESA-ESTEC, The Netherlands).
Global observation is done with a revisit time of 3 days in
H and V polarization. The spatial resolution will be better than
50km and the incidence angle coverage is ranging from 0°-
50°. A sun-synchronous orbit was proposed to ensure the
requisite sampling, and at the same time to minimize signal
perturbing effects such as Faraday rotation, Sun glint, and
thermal differences in soils and vegetation. A 3 x 6 Y
configuration (3 segments per arm with 6 radiometers each)
with additional 18 radiometers on the central hub, thus a total
of 69 receivers coupled to patch antennas, was selected as the
baseline. The snapshot sensitivity is expected to be around 2.4
K, which will be improved for salinity measurements by a
spatial and temporal averaging of the ground resolution to a
grid of about 200 km pixel size. The circular orbit has an
altitude of 756 km and the instrument has a tilt angle of 32.5°
with respect to nadir. The spatial resolution is about 35 km in
the center of the swath and about 50 km at the edge of the
swath. The launch is planned for spring 2008.
Both missions, SMOS and Aquarius, operate exactly at the
same frequency band and have an operational life-time
overlap of about two years. Hence a cross-correlation of the
measurements in order to check the absolute accuracy will be
possible. However, the differences in the imaging geometry,
the spatial resolution, and the sensitivity have to be
considered.
ESA and NASA-JPL are currently investigating large
aperture synthesis instruments operating from a geo-stationary
orbit, i.e. in a distance of about 36,000 km from the Earth’s
WFMN07_II_C1, pp. 75-83 http://archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/2007/0210/
79 Proceedings of WFMN07, Chemnitz, Germany
surface. GeoSTAR (Geostationary Synthetic Thinned
Aperture Radiometer) [11] headed by NASA-JPL shall be a
stationary Y-shaped instrument to provide high-resolution
microwave images at bands around 53 and 183 GHz for
monitoring rapidly evolving and dynamic atmospheric
phenomena such as hurricanes and thunderstorms, or
measuring temperature, water vapor, and rain from space due
to the ability to penetrate cloud cover. GAS (Geostationary
Atmospheric Sounder) [12] funded by ESA has similar goals
using frequency bands around 53, 118, 183, and 380 GHz. In
contrast to GeoSTAR it shall utilize a highly thinned Y-
shaped array, rotating around its central axis in order to reduce
the required number of receivers and to compensate for spatial
under-sampling.
B. Airborne systems
Airborne radiometer systems offer a broad spectrum of
applications for military and civil use. In the military area
millimeter-wave systems can be used for short- to mid-range
observations of a few hundred of metres or a few kilometres
in surveillance, reconnaissance, and target tracking on seekers
or unmanned areal vehicle (UAV) platforms. Here the
advantage of radiometers is their passive and therefore covert
operation, a quasi-optical and therefore easy-to-interpret
appearance of images, and the capability of nadir looking
especially for mountainous and urban areas. DLR has
constructed an airborne line scanner using an oscillating dish
antenna, mainly used at W band around 90 GHz with an
angular resolution of about 1° and 1.8K sensitivity at 100 µs
integration time. Fig. 11 shows an image of an airport scene
with some parking aircrafts measured from a 100 m altitude.
Note the quasi-optical appearance of the radiometric image,
which allows a clear attribution for reconnaissance even for
bad weather conditions.
Fig. 11. Video image and measured 90 GHz brightness temperature map of an
airport area using an airborne line scanner system.
Another application of imaging radiometry is the use in
pollution control like oil spill detection [13]. Here the layered
structure of an oil spill on the sea surface shows a reflectivity
and emissivity corresponding to the oil spill thickness and the
observation frequency. A further application is the use as a
possible indicator for vegetation type and status. From passive
images different types of farmlands can be discriminated
against each other and groups of trees or forests. Using more
than one frequency can allow a more detailed analysis of field
types and their temporal ripeness. The high sensitivity of
radiometric measurements on physical temperatures as well as
on water contents allows additionally the mission of
radiometer systems for safety monitoring in the case of forest
fires or floods. Furthermore, the prevention of disasters can be
achieved by a periodic surveillance of sensitive areas as in the
case of protected zones above pipelines, for instance.
Soil moisture and ocean salinity are also measured from
aircraft, in many cases as a support for the design and
operation of satellite missions. So ESA is also funding several
aperture synthesis demonstrators like MIRAS [14] and HUT-
2D [15], on one hand as learning platforms for image
reconstruction and retrieval algorithm development, on the
other hand for acquiring true data. MIRAS has a similar Y
shape and similar receivers and correlators as the SMOS
instrument, but it consists only of 13 elements synthesizing an
antenna aperture of about 1.1 m diameter and a beam width of
about 9° for constant tapering. Fig. 12 shows some
photographs of the array structure using patch antennas and
the installation on the aircraft.
Fig. 12. Photographs of the MIRAS demonstrator – the array configuration
(left) and the system mounted on the backside of the aircraft (right) (Source:
ESA-ESTEC, The Netherlands).
HUT-2D is a U-shaped array of about 1.95 m x 1.8 m size
using 36 receivers coupled to patch antennas with a spacing of
0.7 wavelengths. Hence a synthesized beam width between 5°
and 10° can be achieved depending on the tapering used, and
the sensitivity is about 2.8 K at a 250 ms integration time.
Here also the center frequency and bandwidth are chosen
similar to SMOS. Fig. 13 shows a photograph of the
instrument and an imaging result of a test flight over land.
The American ESTAR system [4] was the first airborne
instrument using aperture synthesis at L band for measuring
soil moisture. Here aperture synthesis was used across track
and a real aperture was used along track with respect to the
flight direction. This imaging principle is also used for the
LRR-X system built by NASA and the University of
Michigan, synthesizing an aperture of about 1 m x 1 m at X
band (10.7 GHz) using 12 receivers connected to slotted
waveguide antennas. A nadir angular resolution of 1.5° and a
sensitivity of 0.3 K are achieved. The purpose of this
radiometer is the conduction of high quality rainfall
measurements in order to support the Global Precipitation
WFMN07_II_C1, pp. 75-83 http://archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/2007/0210/
80 Proceedings of WFMN07, Chemnitz, Germany
Measurement (GPM) mission [16]. Fig. 14 shows a
measurement result prior and after a rainfall event and the
system as mounted on the aircraft.
Fig. 13. Photograph of the HUT-2D instrument as mounted below the aircraft.
The lower images show the measurement result (left) for a flight over land
with changing texture (right) (Source: HUT, Finland).
Fig. 14. Measurement results of the LRR-X instrument prior to and after a
rainfall event. The lower left image is a corresponding optical image of the
scene. The photograph on the right shows the instrument as mounted on the
aircraft (Source: University of Michigan, USA).
C. Ground-based systems
Modern ground-based applications of imaging radiometry
are represented by surveillance, hidden object detection, or
long-term data acquisition for geo-science applications [17].
The contamination by landmines is increasingly recognized as
an inhumane burden on countries ravaged by war, many of
these poor. Conventional techniques, like metal detectors or
trained dogs are too inefficient to solve this problem. Also,
plastic materials are increasing being used to avoid detection.
International terrorism has reached a level where adequate
countermeasures to protect the population have to be provided
by the authorities. Similarly, the improved surveillance and
protection of sensitive infrastructures, like for instance nuclear
power plants, airports, or mass events attracts increased
attention. Hence, research on these new challenges had been
animated through various national and international
organizations, and so we also consider passive microwave
sensors to improve the situation [18].
For buried object detection like landmines the lower
microwave region has to be used due to penetration depth
constraints. Within the HOPE (Handheld Operational
dEmining system) project DLR developed a multi-spectral
radiometer system in the range of 1.5 to 7 GHz. Imaging
measurements can be carried out in bands of 50 MHz width
by moving manually or automatically a broadband antenna
close to the surface of the area of interest. An imaging result
performed on a buried object scenario using landmine
dummies and false targets is shown in fig. 15 [19].
Fig. 15. Photographs showing the HOPE radiometer in operation and the
scenario with the objects on the surface. Measurements for all objects buried
have been carried out at various frequencies using a regular raster scan.
The surveillance of critical infrastructures requires a 24
hour operation in all weather conditions on large areas. The
imaging principle of the DLR ground-based experimental
imager ABOSCA is shown in fig. 16. The main goal was the
capability to image a full hemisphere and have a high
flexibility concerning modifications. A rotating parabolic
mirror provides an image line, and the azimuth movement of
the whole unit delivers the second image dimension.
Fig. 16. Photograph of the ABOSCA ground-based line scanner system.
WFMN07_II_C1, pp. 75-83 http://archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/2007/0210/
81 Proceedings of WFMN07, Chemnitz, Germany
The system is operated at 90GHz, 37GHz and 9.6GHz with
about 0.6°, 1.5°, and 5.8° of angular far-field resolution. The
measurement duration for the complete hemisphere is less
than 5 minutes at W band and even less for the other bands,
and the sensitivity is in the order of 0.1 K. An image of a large
front court area is shown in fig. 17. Note again the quasi-
optical character of the radiometer image simplifying the
interpretation. Many fine details can be observed due to the
high sensitivity and angular resolution. Note the mirror images
of various objects in the concrete area. The system was also
successfully operated for through-wall imaging and change
detection experiments [18, 20].
Fig. 17. Photograph and 90 GHz image of a large front court area. Both
images represent a panoramic view for 180° in azimuth.
In order to investigate the suitable resolution and
penetration requirements with respect to concealed weapons
or explosives detection, another line-scanner system was
developed [18]. Here the intention is to generate images of
persons at a close distance of a few meters with a few
centimetres of spatial resolution. Hence, the system is a near-
field imaging device. A fixed parabolic mirror receives the
radiation from a rotating deflection plate. The vertical
movement of the whole unit delivers the second image
dimension. Fig. 18 shows some imaging results of persons
carrying various hidden objects under their clothing.
Fig. 18. Imaging examples of persons carrying various optically non-visible
objects under their clothing, measured at 90 GHz.
The persons have been located in about 2.5 m distance in
front of the instrument measuring again at a frequency band
around 90 GHz. A spatial resolution of about 2 cm was
achieved at this distance. For comparison the optical images
of each identical situation are also illustrated. In the upper left
image a metallic knife wrapped in a newspaper can be
recognized. In the upper right example a handgun in a bag and
a mobile phone in the shirt pocket are visible. Note that no
target at all can be detected in the optical images.
Finally it should be noted that huge efforts are presently
undertaken by many groups in order to develop real-time
high-resolution sufficiently sensitive radiometer systems for
security applications. Many imaging mechanisms are
investigated, and even the sub-millimetre and terahertz
frequency ranges are explored, while here the focus is more
on active systems for sufficient contrast [21].
V. CONCLUSION
Passive imaging technologies have a wide field of
applications in the whole microwave and millimeter-wave
region from about 1 GHz to 300 GHz and above. The main
application areas are geo science, climatology, agriculture,
pollution and disaster control, detection, reconnaissance,
surveillance, status registration, and safety and security in
general. Many of those applications require high spatial and
radiometric resolution, high precision, large fields of view,
quasi real-time imaging, and high frame rates. Consequently
the requirements for the instruments are high and the design is
a challenge. The rapid developments in receiver and computer
electronics of the past ten to twenty years allow the advanced
design and construction of more complex and more powerful
measurement systems, and widen the application areas of each
technology. A detailed but obviously incomplete overview on
existing techniques and technologies was given and illustrated
with examples believed to be representative.
REFERENCES
[1] F.T. Ulaby, R.K. Moore, and A.K. Fung, Microwave Remote Sensing -
Active and Passive - Microwave Remote Sensing Fundamentals and
Radiometry, Vol. I, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1981.
[2] A.R. Thompson, J.M. Moran, and G.W. Swenson, Interferometry and
Synthesis in Radio Astronomy, John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
[3] M. Peichl, H. Suess, M. Suess, and S. Kern, Microwave Imaging of the
Brightness Temperature Distribution of Extended Areas in the Near and
Far Field using Two-dimensional Aperture Synthesis with High Spatial
Resolution, Radio Science, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1998.
[4] Ruf C. S., C. T. Swift, A. B. Tanner and D. M. Le Vine, Interferometric
Synthetic Aperture Microwave Radiometry for the Remote Sensing of
the Earth, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol.
26, no. 5, September 1988.
[5] P.F. Goldsmith et al., Focal plane imaging systems for millimeter-wave
imaging, IEEE Trans. on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 41,
No. 10, Oct. 1993.
[6] R. Appleby et al., Mechanically scanned real-time passive millimetre-
wave imaging at 94 GHz, Proc. of SPIE, Passive Millimetre-Wave
Imaging Technology VI and Radar Sensor Technology VII, Vol. 5077,
Orlando, Florida, USA, 23-24 April 2003.
[7] The Multi-Frequency Imaging Microwave Radiometer, Instrument Panel
Report, European Space Agency (ESA), ESA SP-1138, 8-10, rue Mario-
Nikis, 75738 Paris Cedex 15, France, August 1990.
[8] J.P. Hollinger, J.L. Peirce, G.A. Poe: SSM/I Instrument Evaluation,
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 28, No. 5,
September 1990, pp. 781-790.
[9] http://aquarius.gsfc.nasa.gov.
WFMN07_II_C1, pp. 75-83 http://archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/2007/0210/
82 Proceedings of WFMN07, Chemnitz, Germany
[10] ESA Publications Division, SMOS - ESA's water mission, BR-224,
ESA-ESTEC, PO Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands, June
2004, for further information visit
http://www.esa.int/export/esaLP/smos.html
[11] Tanner A.B. et al., A Prototype Geostationary Synthetic Thinned
Aperture Radiometer (GeoSTAR) for Atmospheric Temperature
Sounding, 9th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and
Remote Sensing Applications, MicroRad ‘06, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 28
February - 03 March 2006.
[12] J. Christensen et al., GAS: the Geostationary Atmospheric Sounder,
Proc. of IGARSS, International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium, Barcelona, Spain, 23-27 July 2007.
[13] K. Grüner, G. Kahlisch, H. Schreiber, P. Sliwinski, B. Vowinkel: A
New Passive Microwave Line Scanner for Airborne Measurements of
Maritime Oil Pollutions, IEEE-MTT Conf., Albuquerque, New Mexico,
1992.
[14] N. Duffo et al., Some results of the MIRAS-SMOS demonstrator
campaigns, Proc. of IGARSS, International Geoscience and Remote
Sensing Symposium, Barcelona, Spain, 23-27 July 2007.
[15] J. Kainulainen et al., First 2-D Interferometric Radiometer Imaging of
the Earth From an Aircraft, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Letters, Vol. 4, No. 2, April 2007.
[16] C. Ruf et al., Lightweight Rainfall Radiometer STAR Aircraft Sensor,
Proc. of the 2002 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium, Toronto, Canada, 2002.
[17] F. Lemaitre et al., Design and Test of the Ground-Based L-Band
Radiometer for Estimating Water in Soils (LEWIS), IEEE Transactions
on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 42, No. 8, August 2004.
[18] M. Peichl, S. Dill, M. Jirousek, and H. Suess, Security applications of
microwave radiometry, Proc. of Fraunhofer Symposium "Future
Security", 1st Security Research Conference Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe,
Germany, 04-05 July 2006.
[19] M. Peichl, S. Dill, and H. Suess, Buried landmine detection using
microwave radiometry, Progress in Elecromagnetic Research
Symposium PIERS 2004, Pisa, Italy, 28-31 March 2004.
[20] M. Peichl, S. Dill, M. Jirousek, and H. Suess, Microwave radiometer
systems for security applications, Proc. of Fraunhofer Symposium
"Future Security", 2nd Security Research Conference Karlsruhe,
Karlsruhe, Germany, 12-14 September 2007.
[21] Proc. of SPIE, Defense and Security 2007: Infrared, Tactical and Laser
Sensors and Systems, Vol. 6548 Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging
Technology X, Volume 6549: Terahertz for Military and Security
Applications V, Orlando, Florida, USA, 09-13 April 2007.
WFMN07_II_C1, pp. 75-83 http://archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/2007/0210/
83 Proceedings of WFMN07, Chemnitz, Germany