6
Supporting information Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy J. Ganesh Ummadi a , Vrushali S. Joshi a , Priya R Gupta a , Arup K. Indra b,c,d,e,f and Dipankar Koley a, * a Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. b Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. c Molecular and Cell Biology Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. d Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. e Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA. f Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. *Corresponding author: [email protected] Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Analytical Methods. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015

Microscopy Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical · 2015-09-21 · Supporting information Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Microscopy Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical · 2015-09-21 · Supporting information Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

Supporting information

Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

J. Ganesh Ummadia, Vrushali S. Joshia, Priya R Guptaa, Arup K. Indrab,c,d,e,f and Dipankar Koleya,*

a Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

b Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. c Molecular and Cell Biology Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. d Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. e Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA.f Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Analytical Methods.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015

Page 2: Microscopy Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical · 2015-09-21 · Supporting information Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

Figure S1: (A) Representative CV of a 10 m diameter graphite packed UME in a solution containing 1 mM ferrocene methanol and 0.1 M KCl. (B) Calibration of graphite-packed UME with Ferrocyanide addition.

Page 3: Microscopy Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical · 2015-09-21 · Supporting information Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

Figure S2: SECM image of a single live cell. The image was taken using a 10 m diameter Pt-UME.

Page 4: Microscopy Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical · 2015-09-21 · Supporting information Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

A

0 min 60 min

180 min 246 min

B

0 min 96 min

240 min 173 min

Figure S3: Time-lapse SECM images of a (A) non-synchronized cell (B) serum-starved synchronized cell

Page 5: Microscopy Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical · 2015-09-21 · Supporting information Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1400.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Nor

mal

ized

Cur

rent

X-distance (m)

Figure S4: Probe scan curve over a single cell. Tip-dish distance: 17 m.

Page 6: Microscopy Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical · 2015-09-21 · Supporting information Single-Cell Migration as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

Number of Observations

Group mean(µm/s)

Average Distance

Within Cluster Sum of Squares

Maximum Distance

Migrating 4 8.4 1.7 15.9 3.1Stationary 4 3.2 1.4 7.8 1.7

Table S1: Classification of migrating and stationary cell speeds using k-means clustering. The observations are classified into clusters based on the nearest mean.

The first column is the designation of the two clusters as migrating and stationary. The second column is the number of observations in each cluster. The third column refers to the means of the clusters; the fourth column refers to the average distance of each observation from the mean of the cluster. The group mean of stationary cluster plus the maximum distance from the mean (3.2 + 1.7 = 4.9 µm/s) was used to determine the threshold limit as the speed of 5 µm/s, above which the cell speeds were classified as migrating.