28
Microlensing Microlensing with CCDs with CCDs Philip Yock University of Auckland, NZ http://www.physics. auckland .ac. nz /moa/index.html NZ-Australia Semiconductor Instrumentation Workshop, June 2004

Microlensing with CCDs

  • Upload
    mika

  • View
    38

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Microlensing with CCDs. Philip Yock University of Auckland, NZ http://www.physics.auckland.ac.nz/moa/index.html NZ-Australia Semiconductor Instrumentation Workshop, June 2004. Why microlensing? – Why CCDs?. Precision measurements can be made on stars - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Microlensing with CCDs

Microlensing with Microlensing with CCDsCCDs

Philip Yock

University of Auckland, NZhttp://www.physics.auckland.ac.nz/moa/index.html

NZ-Australia Semiconductor Instrumentation Workshop, June 2004

Page 2: Microlensing with CCDs

Why microlensing? – Why CCDs?

• Precision measurements can be made on stars

• Highest precision measurements on planets

• Many stars must be monitored – CCDs essential

Page 3: Microlensing with CCDs

Basics of microlensing

Earth

Lens

Source

EINSTEIN RING

Page 4: Microlensing with CCDs

Demonstration with a glass lens

• Courtesy Sidney Liebes, Princeton

Page 5: Microlensing with CCDs

Typical astronomical dimensions

20,000 ly 10,000 ly

2 AU1 mas

Page 6: Microlensing with CCDs

Detectable in the Galactic Bulge

Page 7: Microlensing with CCDs

The need for CCDsRequired separation ~ 1mas, but typical separation ~1as

“No chance of observing this phenomenon” - Einstein (1936)

Page 8: Microlensing with CCDs

Typical CCD arrays

MOA-I MOA-II

24 million pixels 80 million pixels

Page 9: Microlensing with CCDs

Ground versus space

MACHO 98-BLG-35

HST MOA

Difference imaging essential from the ground

Page 10: Microlensing with CCDs

Light curve

Typical transverse velocity ~ 200 km/sec

Page 11: Microlensing with CCDs

Light curve

Liebes-Paczynski light curve versus data

Page 12: Microlensing with CCDs

Planetary microlensing

Planets perturb the Einstein ring

Page 13: Microlensing with CCDs

Comparison with Rutherford scattering

Page 14: Microlensing with CCDs

Planetary perturbationsNeptune at 2 AU

Perturbation ~ 5%

Page 15: Microlensing with CCDs

Neptune at ~ 2AU at different

Page 16: Microlensing with CCDs

Earth at ~ 2 AU

Perturbation ~ 0.5%

Page 17: Microlensing with CCDs

Two planets

Detectable if > 20°

Page 18: Microlensing with CCDs

MACHO 98-BLG-35

Magnification = 80 Possible Earth-mass planet

Page 19: Microlensing with CCDs

MOA 2003-BLG-32/OGLE 2003-BLG-219

Magnification = 520

e-4 = Neptune e-5 = Earthe-6 = Mars

(preliminary)

Page 20: Microlensing with CCDs

MOA 2003-BLG-32/OGLE 2003-BLG-219

e-4 = Neptunee-3 = Saturn

Page 21: Microlensing with CCDs

Binary lens

A “caustic” is formed

Page 22: Microlensing with CCDs

MOA 2002-BLG-33

MDM2.4m260 exp

Wise1m20 exp

MOA0.6m480 exp

HST2.4m5 exp

EROS1m186 exp

Boyden1.5m473 exp

Page 23: Microlensing with CCDs

MOA 2002-BLG-33

The light curve determines the lens geometry The lens profiles the source

Page 24: Microlensing with CCDs

MOA 2002-BLG-33

Caustic crossed in 15.6 hours Profiles obtained, on entry and on exit

Page 25: Microlensing with CCDs

Stellar profileMOA 2002-BLG33 Another star

Stellar atmosphere theory confirmed Precision comparable to that of the VLTI -

Very Large Telescope Interferometer at ESO

Page 26: Microlensing with CCDs

Conclusions

Stellar gravitational lenses exist

Extra-solar planets detectable

Stars resolvable

Nature helpful!

Page 27: Microlensing with CCDs

64 million dollar question

Is SU(3)SU(2)U(1) being studied on other planets?

Page 28: Microlensing with CCDs

Acknowledgements

Ian Bond & Nick Rattenbury

John Hearnshaw & Yasushi Muraki

Colleagues in MOA, MACHO, EROS, OGLE, FUN, PLANET

Marsden Fund, Department of Education of Japan