Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    1/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    SSA10 : Pertuis Charentais

    Experiences & Perspectives

    1 Ifremer, Environment and Resource Laboratory of Poitou Charente,2 Ifremer, UMR Amure, Marine Economics Departement3 Ifremer, Coastal System Dynamics Department4 UBO, UMR Amure5 Cemagref Cestas, ADER Unit6 EPTB Charente7 Eauca

    Michel Lample4, Jean Prou1, Cdric Bacher3, Johanna Ball-Bganton2, Rmi Mongruel2, Jos A. Prez

    Agndez2, Alice Vanhoutte-Brunier2, Harold Rthoret6, Franoise Vernier5, Paul Bordenave5, Jacqueline

    Candau5, Valrie Deldrve5, Franois Delmas5 and Julien Neveu7

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    2/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    SSA10 : Charente river & coastal zone

    The Pertuis Charentais

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    3/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    Pertuis Charentais policy issue : freshwater quantitative management

    The Charente river catchment and its coastal zone, ncluding the Marennes-Olron oyster farming area

    Freshwaterscarcity in the Charente river catchment

    Basic needs in summer :- the availability of drinking water- The good ecological status of ecosystem

    Main industries :- Agriculture (irrigation)- Shellfish farming

    The policy issue :

    quantitative management of the freshwater in the Charente r

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    4/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    Freshwater scarcity in Pertuis Charentais

    The regional plan for water management (SDAGE) and the "Watershortage Management Plan (PGE) have led to the hierarchy of theuses of freshwater:

    1) good ecological status of the coastal ecosystems2) availability of drinking water for households (and tourists)3) other uses: agriculture, shellfish farming

    This policy issue has been chosen by the stakeholder group aroundthe current debate of :modifying the authorized volumes of water for each uses (drinkingwater, irrigation)improving restriction rules.

    ExtendSim Integrated model of ecosystem services providedby freshwater,

    in order to explore conflict mitigation

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    5/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    Ecosystem services and user conflicts in the Pertuis Charentais region

    Support services

    Regulating services

    Siltation control

    Hydro. stability and flood mitigation

    Plankton dynamics

    Cultural services

    Provisioning services

    Households

    Farmers

    Fishermenassociation

    s

    Wetlandmanagers

    Shellfishfarmers

    Primary productivity

    Bioturbation (sediment mixing)

    Habitat preservation

    Drinking water

    Freshwater for irrigation

    Support of transport

    Recreational fishing

    Support of local traditional activities

    Source of well-being

    In the model

    Underconstruction

    12 m3/s !!!

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    6/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    Modelling ecosystem services

    User interface of the ExtendSim model: a Social System Projection

    USAGES

    RESSOURCES

    GOVERNANCE

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    7/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    Institutional framework : the windows for scenarios

    Water policy Agriculturalpolicy

    Shellfish Farmingpolicy

    Laws WaterFrameworkDirective

    CommonAgriculturalPolicy

    National Decreeon Marinecultures

    Local rules Hierarchy ofwater uses

    Authorisedvolumes forirrigation

    Structural plan(leasing grounds

    allocation)

    Collectiveagreements

    Schedule ofwater releasesfrom dams

    Irrigationschedules andpractices

    Oyster banksand calendarmanagement

    Institutional changes -> scenarios

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    8/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    Water Management Scenarios irrigation

    Annual :

    Periodic :

    Collaborative :

    Annualauthorised

    Volume(m3)

    Periodicauthorised

    Volume(m3)

    x

    Annualauthorised

    Volume(m3)

    IrrigationDispatchfunction

    Period

    =

    Periodicauthorised

    Volume(m3)

    M T W T F S S M

    =

    Periodic +

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    9/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    Well ordered topological model

    UsagesUsages

    ResourcesResourcesResourcesResources

    Forcing

    Conceptual topological projection

    GovernanceGovernance

    UsagesUsages UsagesUsages

    Bad links

    Database

    High impedanceComponent

    effect

    Time delay

    effect

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    10/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    Governance for irrigation

    Governance always needs regulation procedures and tools as "signal"integration in order to increase his own impedance and avoid dramaticoscillations of the controlled system.

    "Measuring is integrating" (Lon lebesgue "theorie de la mesure")

    measurements

    model

    Irrigation flowRestriction threshold

    Ban threshold

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    11/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    IHM and OUTPUTS

    -Accessible scenario-dialog-build inline forcing conditions-stakeholders scenarios for irrigation on theWS

    -Cumulative traffic-lights :-for irrigation restrictions/bans

    -for corn yield stress.

    Corn yield stress Irrigation bans

    Governance

    scenarios dialog

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    12/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    SOME RESULTS

    The i-ESE model proves no real advancesfor a "promising" collaborative scenario

    Where did the 12 m3/s come from ?

  • 8/8/2019 Michel - Littoral 2010 (Education Centre)

    13/13

    Littoral.20

    10

    London21

    -23

    September2010

    SSA10

    At this stage of the project, we were pleased with the positive feedbacksfrom the participant stakeholderand scientific group.

    The water management agency (EPTB) for the Charente riverforesees a high potential for exploration of different managementscenarios and is now highly involved in the continuing developmentof the model.

    They are also very interested by the communication possibilities of thetool for future discussions and negotiations with other managementactors and local farmers.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Thank you for attention

    -Appropriation of the model by managers

    -Forecasting model for weekly management of irrigation

    Perspectives :