Upload
dangbao
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
3
Fusion Technology Comparison
1.00E+06
1.00E+09
1.00E+12
1.00E+15
1.00E+13 1.00E+16 1.00E+19 1.00E+22 1.00E+25
1.00E+02
1.00E+05
1.00E+08
1.00E+11
Driver PowerPlasma Energy
kJ
MJ
GJ
MW
GW
TW
$ C
ost
of
Co
nfi
nem
ent
$ C
ost
of
Dri
ver
NIF
GF
Plasma Density (cm-3)
Magnetic Field (Tesla)
30 1.00E+3 3.00E+4 1.00E+6
Normal
Super-
conductor HTC Max DC
Max Flux
Compression
ITER
1
5
Small Plasma Injector
• Direct formation: no acceleration
stage.
• Comparable to CTX and SSPX
designs
• Lower maximum plasma density
than large injectors
• Faster design iteration
• Designed for use in plasma
compression experiments
6
Plasma Lifetime Progress
6
0.5
1.0
1.5
0
Polo
idal F
ield
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
µsSept 2012 May 2013
Dec 2013
Feb 2014
October 2015
100 µs thermal life
Self-heating to >300 eV
Co
mp
ressio
nTim
e
Tesla
General Fusion has created a long-lived plasma that we believe is good enough to compress.
10
Fixed Radiation Death
• Changed from Ti coating to
Li coating. Lower Z. Less
brittle coating
• Put a vacuum gap between
the driver and the liner.
Shockless acceleration of
the liner
11
Poloidal Field Compression: Compression Test #12
Chart of increase in magnetic field during compression
18
Conclusion
• We can make plasma with sufficient confinement before compression
• Radiation losses have been fixed and plasma stability is now maintained during compression
• There is some evidence of heating during compression in experiments so far
• Now aiming to get better heating and higher temperatures in future shots