37
Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

  • View
    220

  • Download
    6

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Michael Tomasello

Max Planck Institutefor Evolutionary Anthropology

Leipzig, Germany

Where Does Grammar Come From?[in ontogeny]

Page 2: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Phylogeny (species)

History (cultural group)

Ontogeny (individual)

Page 3: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

UG ACCOUNT

• Learning of periphery

• Innate UG core: linking

U-B ACCOUNT

• All is learned (cognitively!)

• Dual Inheritance:(i) constructions(ii) general cognitive &

learning processes

DualProcess

Single Process;Not Connectionism

Page 4: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Once a child is able to parse an utterance such as 'Close the door !', he will be able to infer from the fact that the verb 'close' in English precedes its complement 'the door', that all verbs in English precede their complements (Radford, 1990, p.61)

Andrew Radford on UG Approach

Page 5: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Culture: Utterances

Biology: Cognitive & Learning Skills[Intention-reading & Pattern-finding]

Patterns of Language Use: = CONSTRUCTIONS

Language-specific categories and constructions, with universals based on universal processes ofcognition and communication

>>

Page 6: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

“Grammar”

Page 7: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

location

object/theme

Joint Attentional Frame and Semantic Roles

Page 8: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

t

I

A x 3 WOW!

Moll et al. (2008) Infancy.

Common Ground: Referent

Page 9: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Kids Choose “Shared” One

• But NOT when they experience it with another adult (3x) - not own interest

• But NOT when then onlook as adult gets excited (3x) by herself - not adult interest

It’s the one “we” shared in a special way!

Page 10: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Common Ground: Referent

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Moll et al. (2006) Cognition & Development.

One we haven’t shared!

Page 11: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Summary

• Semantics: events + roles

• Pragmatics: given + new

• Syntax: distribution + analogy

• Form: imitative (vocal) learning

Page 12: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Fragments20%

Questions32%

Imperatives9%

SV(X)18%

Complex6%

Copulas15%

5/20%

9/38%

20/67%

6/53%

8/77%

4/38%

Mother’s Item-Based Speech to ChildrenCameron-Faulkner, Lieven, & Tomasello (2004) Cognitive Science

• 51% from 52 frames• 45% start w/ one of 17 words

Page 13: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Cameron-Faulkner, Lieven, & Tomasello (2004)

What’s .18 Where’s .05What’re .09 Where’re .02What do .05 Where shall .01What did .04What has .03 Who’s .08What about .03 Who did .01What shall .02What can .02 Which one .02What does .02What hppnd .01 Why don’t .01What were .01What kind of .01 How many .01

31 frames =>80% of Wh Qs

13 frames =>65% of Wh Qs

Page 14: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

__falldown

__kick

give__ __!

__ running

Broken

Verb Islands at 2 Years of Age

Throw__

not agentbut “kicker”

Tomasello (1992) First Verbs

Page 15: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

English children’s understanding of transitive word order is verb-specific until

age 2.5 - 3.0

1. Spontaneous Speech (+diary)

2. Production Experiments (nonce verbs)

3. Weird Word Order Studies(nonce verbs)

4. Comprehension Experiments (nonce verbs)

5. Priming Studies (English verbs)

Gerntner & Fisher (2006) Preferential Looking?Dittmar et al. (2008)

Tomasello (2000; 2003)

Page 16: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Brooks & TomaselloDevelopmental Psychology (1999)

Adult Model Always Passive:

It’s being tammed by the horsie. It‘s being tammed.

Active Biasing Question:

What‘s the horsie doing (to it)?[encouraging: He‘s tamming it]

Results

12 out of 48 three-year-old children (25%) produced a transitive SVO utterance

Page 17: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2,0 2,6 3,0 3,6 4,0 4,6 5,0 8,0

.German

. Japanese

. Hebrew

. Hebrew

. Japanese [Matsui et al.]

[Wittek]

% c

hild

ren

“Wug” type Studies of Syntax (Tomasello, Cognition, 2000)

Page 18: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Cues in Construction Learning Vary:

Frequency: Cue Availability

Consistency: Cue Reliability

Complexity: Cue Cost

And sometimes cues compete!

Cue Strength

Page 19: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Dittmar, Lieven, & Tomasello (in press) Child Development

Point to Picture Comprehension

Competition Model w/ Novel Verbs

Prototype: Der Hund wieft den Tiger.

Word order: Die Katze wieft die Ziege.

Conflict: Den Hund wieft der Tiger.

German Transitives

Word Order vs. Caseanimacy & agreement controlled

Page 20: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

German children’s correct interpretation of transitive sentences with novel verbs.

7 3 %

8 8 %

9 8 %

4 9 %

9 4 %

1 0 0 %

4 4 %

3 6 %

6 9 %

0 %

2 0 %

4 0 %

6 0 %

8 0 %

1 0 0 %

2 ; 7 - y e a r - o l d s ( N = 1 6 ) 5 - y e a r - o l d s ( N = 1 6 ) 7 - y e a r - o l d s ( N = 1 6 )

% correct pointing

P r o t o t y p e W o r d o r d e r o n l y C o n f l i c t

*

*

* *

* *

* * * *

Dittmar et al. (in press)

Prototype: Der Hund wieft den Tiger.

Word order: Die Katze wieft die Ziege.

Conflict: Den Hund wieft der Tiger.

Page 21: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

3 1 %

3 5 %

7 1 %

4 6 %

6 3 %

3 3 %

0 %

2 %

2 1 %

0 . 0

0 . 1

0 . 2

0 . 3

0 . 4

0 . 5

0 . 6

0 . 7

0 . 8

0 . 9

1 . 0

2 ; 7 - y e a r - o l d s 5 - y e a r - o l d s 7 - y e a r - o l d s

mean proportion of trials

w o r d o r d e r c a s e m a r k i n g n o c h o i c e

Conflict Condition

Den Hund wieft der Tiger.

Dittmar et al. (in press)

Page 22: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

S O - C a s e

1 1 %

S O + C a s e

6 8 %

O S + C a s e

2 1 %

German Child-Directed Transitive Sentences

Conflict: Den Hund wieft der Tiger.

Prototype: Der Hund wieft den Tiger.Word order: Die Katze wieft die Ziege.

*

* Only 1% had no personal pronoun or animacy cue.

Dittmar et al. (in press)

68%11%

21%

Page 23: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

7 9 %

8 7 %

6 8 %

8 6 %8 6 %

1 0 0 %

0 %

2 0 %

4 0 %

6 0 %

8 0 %

1 0 0 %

c u e a v a i l a b i l i t y c u e r e l i a b i l i t y c u e v a l i d i t y

w o r d o r d e r c a s e m a r k i n g

for der = 21%

Why case so slow when higher cue strength than word order?

Page 24: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Polish: Dabrowska & Tomasello (in press) J. Child Language

Elicited Production

Novel Verb Modeled w/

NP-nom VERB NP-masc instr.

Elicited: same verb w/ feminine noun as object

Polish: case marking on nouns - diff for diff gendersQuestion: do they know all instrumentals “same”?

Page 25: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Case Feminine Masculine Neuter

Nominative -a (-Ø, -i) -Ø (-a, -o) -o, -e, -

Genitive -i/-y -a, -u (-i/-y) -a

Dative - e, -i/-y -owi (-u, - e, -i/-y) -u

Accusative - (-Ø) -Ø, -a (- , -o) = NOM

Instrumental - -em (- ) -em

Locative - e, -i/-y - e, -u (-i/-y) - e, -u

Vocative -o, -u, -i/-y, (-Ø) - e, -u, (-o) -o, -e, -

Page 26: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Dabrowska et al. (in press)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2.5 yrolds

3.5 yrolds

fem > mascmasc > fem

Page 27: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

1. S-COMPLEMENTSDiessel & Tomasello, Cognitive Linguistics (2001)

Subjects: Adam, Eve, Sarah, Naomi, Peter, Nina - 1 to 5 yearsComplex Ss: 2807 tokens

Examples from Sarah: Examples from Nina:I think he’s gone See that monkey cryingI think it’s in here See Becca sleepingI think my daddy took it See that goI think I saw one See my hands are washedit’s a crazy bone, I think See he bites meI think dis is de bowl See him lie down

Page 28: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

% Subjects in Complex Ss

1-P 2-P 3-P Lex ImpGuess 100 -- -- -- --Bet 100 -- -- -- --Mean 52 48 -- -- --Know 36 55 05 04 --Think 85 13 02 -- --Wish 97 -- -- 03 --Hope 88 12 -- -- --

See 07 01 01 -- 91Look -- -- -- -- 100Watch -- -- 11 -- 89Remember 6 6 -- -- 88

- Virtually no complementizers

- Virtually no non-present tenses

- Virtually no modals or negations

Diessel & Tomasello, Cognitive Linguistics (2001)

Page 29: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

2. RELATIVE CLAUSESDiessel & Tomasello, Cognitive Linguistics (2000)

- Subjects: 4 CHILDES children from 1;9 to 5;1

- Total of 324 relative clauses

Here’s the toy that goes around.

That’s the sugar that fell out.

There’s the ball I bought

This’s the bird that sings.

That’s the one that goes moo.

Here’s the boy that ran into the water.

Page 30: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Earliest All

NP ONLY:

“The girl that came with us” .05 .19

PRESENTATIONALS

“This is the car that turns around” .75 .47

OBLIQUES

“I’m going to the zoo that has snakes” 0 .06

OBJECT

“She has a bathtub that goes with it” .20* .26

SUBJECT

“The one that not finished is up there” 0 .01

* 50% of these = “Look at all the chairs Peter’s got”

Diessel & Tomasello, Cognitive Linguistics (2000)

Page 31: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Ambridge, Rowland, Theakston, Tomasello (submitted)

Adult: Ask her why the dog is sleeping.Child: Why is the dog sleeping?

Adult: Ask her where the pig can swim.Child: Where can the pig swim?

4 year olds

MAIN RESULT: different number errors for:• different wh- words• different auxiliaries• ‘same’ auxiliary w/ diff number (e.g., do & does)

3. Wh- Questions

Page 32: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

“Jill is easy to see”

4. Tough Movement

[Fabian-Kraus & Ammon (1980]

find 100catch 93save 69draw 53watch 33hear 25

% correct in comprehension4/5 year olds

Page 33: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

• Mommy, can you stay this open?• I come closer so it won‘t fall.• Don‘t giggle me.• She came it over there.• I want to stay this rubber band on.• Eva won‘t stay things where I want them to be.• You cried her.• Will you climb me up there?

• „Kannst Du mich hochklettern?“

1. Transitivity Overgeneralizations

Page 34: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Constraint

• ENTRENCHMENT– Repeated use makes other uses sound unconventional

• PRE-EMPTION– Alternative forms block the extension of a verb to a

construction

• ANALOGIES– Semantic subclasses of verbs

Evidence at 2.5 years:Brooks & Tomasello (1999) Child Development

Evidence for these both at 4.5 years:Brooks & Tomasello (1999) Language

Page 35: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Three constraining factors working over developmental time.

2 3 4 5 6

Entrenchment

PreemptionVerb

Subclasses

Growing abstractness ofthe transitive construction

GiggleChortleLaugh

Many overgeneralizations b/c not entrenched

No overgeneralizationsb/c Verb Islands

Low overgeneralzations b/cpreemtion and verb subclassesin addition to entrenchment

Page 36: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Overall Summary

Early linguistic representations are mostly concrete

w/ item-based abstractions only > no UG core.

Abstractions are created gradually, piecemeal,based on specifiable characteristics of the input -

constraints also > general cognitive processes.

Children produce utterances by combining in functionally appropriate ways known pieces of language of different

kinds > U-B syntax.

Page 37: Michael Tomasello Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig, Germany Where Does Grammar Come From? [in ontogeny]

Final Query

• All theories must employ something like this account to explain the acquisition of particular language-specific constructions

• The question is whether, in addition, we need a second set of acquisition processes to link these constructions to an innate UG?

¿Why?