Upload
elwin-price
View
225
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Michael SipowiczTexas Custom Wine [email protected]
Specifics regarding each variety
Generalities which apply to a broader group
Central Florida Research and Education Center in 1968
Released 1987 (Mortensen 1987)
Little is known about the flavor characteristics or volatiles
A Study of Blanc Du Bois Wine QualityE. Dreyer, Charles Sims, Russell Rouseff, Dennis Gray, and Michael
SipowiczAm. J. Enol. Vitic. 64:1 (2013)
The objective of this study determine:
•Sensory characteristics•Flavor volatiles•Chemical parameters•Relationships between these
Large, representative sample of Blanc Du Bois wines evaluated
A Study of Blanc Du Bois Wine QualityE. Dreyer, Charles Sims, Russell Rouseff, Dennis Gray, and Michael
SipowiczAm. J. Enol. Vitic. 64:1 (2013)
• Seventeen different wines
• 100% Blanc du Bois
• Vintages 2006, 2007 & 2008
A Study of Blanc Du Bois Wine QualityE. Dreyer, Charles Sims, Russell Rouseff, Dennis Gray, and Michael
SipowiczAm. J. Enol. Vitic. 64:1 (2013)
• Wine Quality Evaluation• Florida State Fair 21st Annual Wine and Grape Juice Competition in
2009.• Evaluated by 26 experienced judges
• Descriptive Analysis• 16 Trained panelist
• Chemical Analysis• six replications for each wine
Principal component analysis (PCA) was run to help visualize differences among the wines and how quality might be influenced by those differences.
There are two general categories under which these Blanc Du Bois wines fall
• Wines 9, 13-highest for phenolic/rubber
• Wines 9, 12, and 13-highest means for bitter and greenwood/stemmy character intensity.
• Sweetest wines (6, 7) had greater than 4% residual sugar, grouped with sweet and honey attributes.
• Wines 2 and 3 appeared to be heavily influenced by their titratable acidities and high citrus character
• Three other high quality wines (1, 4, 5) grouped with the sweet, fruity, and floral attributes and opposite the greenwood/stemmy and phenolic/rubber attributes.
Figure 2: PCA samples plot showing PC1 and PC2 for the DA attribute intensity data. Numbers indicate quality ranking of the wine, with 1 being highest quality.
Wines tended to have one of two flavor profiles:
Citrusy, bitter, and greenwood/stemmy wines
Contrast with wines possessing sweet, fruity, and floral attributes
Wines perceived as higher quality aligned with later group attributes
Correlation Analysis:
wine quality was positively correlated with peach and rosenegatively correlated with greenwood/stemmy, phenolic/rubber, bitter,
Strong correlation to Grapefruit & Lemon
The only volatile to correlate negatively with quality (p<0.10) was furfural
Furfural:
Compounds result from degradation ofsugars and carbohydrates by heat (Maillardreactions).
*Consider not barrel aging or adding oak
Maximize:Fruity AromaticsOverripe Honey
Minimize:Stemmy & Green OakyPhenolicRubberBitter
Yeast derived…
passion fruit, boxwood, grapefruit, cat pee and similar things favored in Sauvignon Blanc
Fruit derived…
Bound with glucose. Sweet and floral to resinous and herbaceous
Fruit derived… Must be liberated.
Bottle aging (hydrolysis) – Accelerated with increase in temperature
Glycosidase Enzyme Treatment
Use of pectic enzymes vs. bentonite for juice clarification
Proper pre-fermentation nutrient additions Use bentonite in the fermentor for grape
lots which have historically high post-fermentation stability requirements
Use of post-fermentation pectic (glycosidase) enzymes (Zoecklein, 2003)
Use of pectic enzymes vs. bentonite for juice clarification
Most commercial pectic enzymes have some level of glycosidases, the enzymes that can break the glycosidic bond, releasing bound aroma/flavor components +++
Glycosidases are capable of releasing aromatic terpenols from their non-aromatic precursors +++
Bentonite can adsorb large concentrations of ethyl and acetate esters, thus lowering aroma and aroma intensity -
(Zoecklein 2003, Lourens et al. 2000)
Use of pectic enzymes vs. bentonite for juice clarification
Glycosidases are generally inhibited by small concentrations of glucose Pre-fermentation aroma/flavor evolution will be
minimal Enzyme formulation will facilitate clarification of
juice without the use of bentonite, with some aroma/flavor evolution potential
(Lourens et al. 2000)
Proper pre-fermentation nutrient additions
Too much DAP can lower the production of esters
Nutrient deficiencies during fermentation can lead to unhealthy / stuck fermentation Off flavors / aromas (Zoecklein, 2003)
Use bentonite in the fermentor for grapes which have historically high post-fermentation stability requirements (>2 lb/1000gals)
Bentonite can adsorb large concentrations of ethyl and acetate esters, thus lowering aroma and aroma intensity
Fermentation with bentonite requires the addition of fermentable nitrogen.
Bentonite use during fermentation will reduce (eliminate?) bentonite requirements post-fermentation
(Zoecklein et al., 1995, 1999)
Use of post-fermentation pectic (glycosidase) enzymes
Some suggest that an enzyme should only used on part of a final blend as it is not desired that all the bound flavors are released into the volatile form
Monoterpenes are fairly stable molecules and are hydrolyzed over time, releasing a floral aroma over a long period of ageing.
Enzyme activity will release a lot of flavor/aromatics all at once.
By treating only a part of a blend, the rest of the blend will supply the flavors to enhance the longevity of the wine. (Zoecklein, 2003 & Lourens et al. 2000)
Use of post-fermentation pectic (glycosidase) enzymes
Can be added to a finished wine or a wine with a residual sugar of 50 g/L or less
The enzyme action must be stopped after one to four months depending on the desired effect that is required. The enzymes have to be removed with .4 -.8 Lbs/1000 gallons bentonite, or by precipitation with tannin phenols (preferred)
Bentonite can adsorb large concentrations of ethyl and acetate esters, thus lowering aroma and aroma intensity(Zoecklein, 2003 & Lourens et al. 2000)
Use of post-fermentation pectic (glycosidase) enzymes
Not inhibited by the alcohol content of table wines
Much success with varieties such as Muscat, Gewürztraminer and Riesling
Sauvignon blanc and Chardonnay contain monoterpenes in addition to their specific varietal character. It is not always desirable for these grape varieties to have a terpene background aroma so glycosidase enzymes should be used carefully on these varieties (Lourens et al. 2000)
Perception of Acidity
- SUGAR+ TANNINS+ HERBACIOUSNESS, MP’s- POLYSACCHARIDES+ INTENSITY OF TANNINS+ BITTER / DRYING / ASTRINGENT
Perception of Acidity
Palate Balance Equation
Sweet<-->
Acid + Phenolics
Carbohydrates
Organic acids
Skin, seed, and stem phenol
Polysaccharides
Barrel phenol
Ethanol Enological tannins
Volatile phenols
Speed of Processing Skin Contact
WHITES-Atypical Phenolic Profile
Astringency, Bitterness, Drying
NZ “Kiwi” Style Sauvignon Blanc --Likely NOT Possible Utilizing Current Transport CrushProtocols
Length of Contact With Skins Equal Opportunity Extraction Transport ,Fermentation &
Maceration SubjectiveSugar, Polysaccharides, Body,
Color, Aromasvs.
Bitterness, Drying, Tannins
Perception of Phenols
+ ACID+ HERBACIOUSNESS, MP’s- POLYSACCHARIDES, OTHER SUGARS+ INTENSITY OF TANNINS+ BITTER / DRYING / ASTRINGENT- ETHANOL (Up to 14%, + Above 14%)+ VOLATILE SULFUR COMPOUNDS
Perception of Phenols
Palate Balance Equation
Sweet<-->
Acid + Phenolics
Carbohydrates
Organic acids
Skin, seed, and stem phenol
Polysaccharides
Barrel phenol
Ethanol Enological tannins
Volatile phenols
Proper pre-fermentation nutrient Proper pre-fermentation nutrient additionsadditions
Too much DAP can lower the production of esters
Nutrient deficiencies during fermentation can lead to unhealthy / stuck fermentation Off flavors / aromas (Zoecklein, 2003)
MOG (materials other than grapes) MOG (materials other than grapes) removal & Stem separationremoval & Stem separation
Properly functioning destemmer Leaves in the fermenter can be a source
of herbal character Sensory differences dramatic between
wines made with and without jack stem removal
Post-destemmer sorting tables
Sort/Cull as much rot as possible. An incidence level of only 1-3% can
negatively influence quality depending on the extent and nature of the rot.
Larger yeast inoculation High incidences of fungal degradation
influence must nitrogen and micronutrients Test pre-fermentation nutrient levels
and adjust accordingly
(Zoecklein, 1997)
Consider whole cluster pressing whites vs crush and drain. Press lightly or segregate.
Cold settle using pectic enzymes and PVPP. The enzymes will help lower the non-soluble solids level.
The PVPP will help to bind some of the harsh, low molecular weight phenols which have been extracted due to the rot. Use up to 4 pounds/1000 gal PVPP
(Zoecklein, 1997)
Consider Hyper-oxygenation (Hyper-Ox)
Add ~15ppm Free SO2 (Reserves some O2 for Healthy Fermentation)
“Rake” Pan as Juice is Pressed Out▪ or
Bubble air into receiving tank
Consider Hyper-oxygenation (Hyper-Ox) Juice will “Brown Out”
PPO will React with Phenols ▪ Leads to polymerization and Precipitation of Phenolics
that contribute to Bitterness
Oxygen is a limiting factor in reaction Don’t Over do it….Can lead to LOSS of
aromatics▪ 9mg/L O2 per Liter of Juice
….BALANCE
Palate Balance Equation
Sweet<-->
Acid + Phenolics
Carbohydrates
Organic acids
Skin, seed, and stem phenol
Polysaccharides
Barrel phenol
Ethanol Enological tannins
Volatile phenols
Lenoir
Very Old Wine Grape Variety
Heritage Unknown
Believed to be a V. aestivalis / V. viniferahybrid
By many is considered Inferior to more mainstream European Varieties due to an Atypical Aromatic/Flavor Profile
Influenced by Production Practices?
Issues
Color stability“Odd” or “Off” flavor“Animal” or Vinyl Phenol AromasPoor structure
Based On:
Years of Winemaker’s Experience
Anecdotal Evidence
Numerous Sensory Trials
Aroma / Flavor Trait Appears to be Affected By:
Fermentation Temperature
pH
Yeast and as Well Malolactic Bacteria Strains
Presence of Other Grape Varieties
Some Suspicion That Vinylphenols Involved
Controlled Environment
Lab Fermentation Trials--Common Red Winemaking Protocols
Find Correlations
Sensory Evaluation and Analysis
Recommendations
COOL FERM (C ) WARM FERM (H)
SKINS NO SKINS SKINS NO SKINS
ML 3 REPS 3 REPS 3 REPS 3 REPS
NO ML 3 REPS 3 REPS 3 REPS 3 REPS
Warm Lots Fermented 90-95ºF
Cool Lots Fermented 75-80ºF
COLOR
pH
VARIETAL CHARACTER / ATYPICAL AROMA
Vinylphenols Are Produced ByHydroxycinnamate decarboxylase (HCDC)
Decarboxylation of p-coumeric acid (others too)
Many Yeast and Bacteria Have Varying Degrees of HCDC Activity
HCDC Activity Increases as Temperature Increases
Incidentally as pH Increases
Vinylphenols React With Anthocyanins (mainly malvidin-3-O-glucoside) In Vitis vinifera
Results in Vinylphenolic Pyranoanthocyanin VERY Stable Color Non-Aromatic Product
Many Anthocyanins Unique to Black Spanish
Lower Occurrence of Malvidin-3-O-Glucoside Than European Varieties
Vinylphenols React With Anthocyanins (mainly malvidin-3-O-glucoside) In Vitis vinifera
Results in Vinylphenolic Pyranoanthocyanin VERY Stable Color Non-Aromatic Product
Options:
Prevent / Inhibit Vinylphenol formation
Increase Anthocyanins in fermentation to form non-aromatic aducts
Options: Prevent / Inhibit Vinylphenol formation
“Cinn- Free”(cinnamoyl esterase negative) Yeast and ML bugs
Some yeasts: T73, V1116/K1, BM4X4, ICV Opale, CSM,
Steinberger/DGI 288
Some ML bacteria: CH11, CH16, CH35 and Oenos 2.0
Cinnamoyl esterase negative Enzymes Too!
Options: Increase Anthocyanins in fermentation to form non-aromatic aducts
Co-Fermentation / Addition of Concentrates
Cooler FermentationsAvoid ML Fermentation or use
cinnamoyl esterase negative selectionsKeep pH LowerOn SkinsPromote active oxygen species in
fermentation Addition of ellagitannin can enhance
formation of stable wine pigments (vitisinA)
Speed of Processing Skin Contact
• Potassium Content of Fruit
• K+ will exchange one-to-one with H+
pH
Length of Contact With SkinspH / K+ RelationshipFermentation & MacerationSubjective++Bitterness, Drying, Tannins & Tannin Intensity- - Sugar, Polysaccharides, Body
Malolactic Fermentation ML
0.1-0.3units 0.01-
0.03g/L
pH TA
Volatile Acidity a.k.a. VAAcetic Acid- <400mg/L normal in New Wine (Dry)++ Vineyard Yeasts ---Rapid Processing +++ Acetobacter aceti
---Needs O2 ---Not a fan of SO2
U.S. legal limits: Red Table Wine 1.2 g/LWhite Table Wine 1.1 g/L
Adjustments
Acid AdditionsDeacidification
Carbonates Ion Exchange Other-Specialized Yeast, Carbonic
Maceration, etc.
Perception of Acidity
- SUGAR+ TANNINS+ HERBACIOUSNESS, MP’s- POLYSACCHARIDES+ INTENSITY OF TANNINS+ BITTER / DRYING / ASTRINGENT
Perception of Acidity
Palate Balance Equation
Sweet<-->
Acid + Phenolics
Carbohydrates
Organic acids
Skin, seed, and stem phenol
Polysaccharides
Barrel phenol
Ethanol Enological tannins
Volatile phenols
Harvest Timing Warm Climate Grape Growing
Hang Time USUALLY NO PROBLEM “SUGARING UP”
Sugar
Speed of Processing-- Grape Berry Microflora
Yeasts, Molds and Bacteria
95-98% of Total are Bacteria and Molds
Directly Compete with Desirable Yeast Pitch for Nutrients and Carbon Source
Speed of Processing
Inside wall1/3 inside Middle
Malic 2.13 g/L 1.93 g/L 0.13 g/L
Lactic 0.23 g/L 0 0
Ethanol 0.13 % 1.93 % 4.97%
Brix 23.1 21.6 19.2
Analysis of Machine Harvested Grapes Samples were taken after transport.
Table shows the change in malic acid, lactic acid, ethanol and brix after transport. Based on these and other data there is considerable fermentation occurring during transport. --Cobb, 2007
Adjustments --Chaptalization
27 CFR PART 24--Subpart F--Production of Wine§ 24.177 Chaptalization (Brix adjustment).“…sugar, or concentrated juice of the same kind of fruit may be added before or during fermentation to develop alcohol. The quantity of sugar or concentrated juice added may not raise the original density of the juice above 25 degrees Brix.”
Adjustments --Chaptalization
Cane Sugar --- Gets the Job Done --- “Donut Hole” Wine
Grape Concentrate --- Varietal grape Concentrates, MegaPurple, Ultra Red, etc…
Perception of Sweetness
- TANNINS- HERBACIOUSNESS, MP’s+ POLYSACCHARIDES, OTHER SUGARS- INTENSITY OF TANNINS- BITTER / DRYING / ASTRINGENT+ ETHANOL- VOLATILE SULFUR COMPOUNDS- ACIDS
Perception of Sweetness
Palate Balance Equation
Sweet<-->
Acid + Phenolics
Carbohydrates
Organic acids
Skin, seed, and stem phenol
Polysaccharides
Barrel phenol
Ethanol Enological tannins
Volatile phenols
Phenolics, Skin, Seed, and Stem Phenol, Barrel Phenol, Enological tannins, Volatile phenols, Tannin Intensity, Astringency, Bitterness, Drying, Green Herbaciousness, MP’s
PHENOLS
Harvest Timing
Ripe vs. “Mature”“Fruit at the Desirable Brix”
vs.
Stems and Seeds Brown with Developed Aromatics
Speed of Processing - MOGMethoxypyrazine, IBMP
(2-methoxy-3-isobutylpyrazine), imparts a vegetal aroma at relatively low concentrations in the fruit, ranging from zero to 35 ng/L.
Present in green plant tissues, including grapes.
Perceptible at 1 ng/L (1 part per billion)
Speed of Processing - MOGMethoxypyrazine, IBMP
IBMP are VERY easily liberated into the juice
Speed of Processing Skin Contact
WHITES-Atypical Phenolic Profile
Astringency, Bitterness, Drying
NZ “Kiwi” Style Sauvignon Blanc --Likely NOT Possible Utilizing Current Transport CrushProtocols
Length of Contact With Skins Equal Opportunity Extraction Transport ,Fermentation &
Maceration SubjectiveSugar, Polysaccharides, Body,
Color, Aromasvs.
Bitterness, Drying, Tannins
AdjustmentsExtended Maceration vs. Short-VattingOak Barrel Aging and Oak AdditivesEnological TanninsProteinaceous Fining-
Egg White, Isinglass, Casein Long Chain-Astringency
Gelatine, PVPP Short Chain-BitterR.S. or PolysaccharidesDeacidification?
Perception of Phenols
+ ACID+ HERBACIOUSNESS, MP’s- POLYSACCHARIDES, OTHER SUGARS+ INTENSITY OF TANNINS+ BITTER / DRYING / ASTRINGENT- ETHANOL (Up to 14%, + Above 14%)+ VOLATILE SULFUR COMPOUNDS
Perception of Phenols
Palate Balance Equation
Sweet<-->
Acid + Phenolics
Carbohydrates
Organic acids
Skin, seed, and stem phenol
Polysaccharides
Barrel phenol
Ethanol Enological tannins
Volatile phenols
Targeted aroma & taste characteristics:Healthy Vines
Optimum Maturity Level
Varying Levels of Maturity Per Variety•Example: Cabernet Sauvignon- dark cherry, black berry, black current, etc.
Harvest Timing
Ripe vs. “Mature”“Fruit at the Desirable Brix”
vs.
Stems and Seeds Brown with Developed Aromatics
Harvest Timing- Elevated MP’s
Seed tannins make up over 60% of the total tannin concentration
Pyrazines, such as IBMP, are found in stems (53%), seeds (31%),seeds (31%), skins (15%), and flesh (1%)
Reds- Reds- saignée or “bleeding”Increases ratio of skins to juice within tankConcentrates and increases red wine varietal characterConcentrates and increases red wine body, structural depth and color potentialYields secondary product: Rosé de saignée
Rosé produced from red grapes that undergo a short maceration acquiring some color.
Stylistically “bigger” than rosés de pressurage
Proper pre-fermentation nutrient Proper pre-fermentation nutrient additionsadditions
Too much DAP can lower the production of esters
Nutrient deficiencies during fermentation can lead to unhealthy / stuck fermentation Off flavors / aromas (Zoecklein, 2003)
MOG (materials other than grapes) MOG (materials other than grapes) removal & Stem separationremoval & Stem separation
Properly functioning destemmer Leaves in the fermenter can be a source
of herbal character Sensory differences dramatic between
wines made with and without jack stem removal
Post-destemmer sorting tables
Cap managementCap managementGentle practices, minimize excessive
extractions Short Vatting- selective extraction Délestage Seed deportation it must be gentle, and extremely gentle
beyond mid-fermentation
Cap managementCap managementShort Vatting- Selective extraction by dejuicing prior to
dryness Traditional short vatting: Rapid diffusion of
desirable pigments, tannins and polysaccharides from the skins and the pulp, and the stabilization of phenols and aromatic compounds (Delteil, 2000).
Cap managementCap management
Délestage Délestage, with or without seed
deportation, allows for fairly rapid diffusion without over-extraction.
Cap managementCap managementDélestage
(DELTEIL 2003)
0
1
2
3
4
ICV
Scal
e
1. Foremouth volume 2. Acidity 3. Tannic Intensity4. Astringency 5. Dryness 6. Bitterness
0
1
2
3
4
ICV
Scal
e
1. Foremouth volume 2. Acidity 3. Tannic Intensity4. Astringency 5. Dryness 6. Bitterness
Only pumping over, 15 days maceration
Only pumping over, 15 days maceration
7 Délestages during a 15 days maceration
7 Délestages during a 15 days maceration
Oxygenation: Barrel aging, Oxygenation: Barrel aging, rack-splash operations, rack-splash operations, MicrooxidationMicrooxidation
Oxidation of some sulfur-containing compounds may result in the muting of the varietal character of treated wines.
Seems a result of changes in peripheral compounds which enforce sensory perception
(Zoecklein, Sullivan 2002)
Sort/Cull as much rot as possible. An incidence level of only 1-3% can
negatively influence quality depending on the extent and nature of the rot.
Larger yeast inoculation High incidences of fungal degradation
influence must nitrogen and micronutrients Test pre-fermentation nutrient levels
and adjust accordingly
(Zoecklein, 1997)
….BALANCE
Palate Balance Equation
Sweet<-->
Acid + Phenolics
Carbohydrates
Organic acids
Skin, seed, and stem phenol
Polysaccharides
Barrel phenol
Ethanol Enological tannins
Volatile phenols
Other considerations:
Run pre-fermentation nutrient analysis!!! Native yeast/bacteria, fruit rot, poor
sanitation, long settlings, and delayed inoculation can deplete must nutrients, and may produce toxins. In such cases, the level of yeast inoculum should be increased, along with the fermentable N supplementation to a level of 250 mg/L N or more.
(Zoecklein, 2005)
Other considerations:
Sulfidic or Sulfur-Like Off-oder Testing
Gusmer has the Kit
DO IT!
Have A Grape Day!Have A Grape Day!
QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?