State Highway Operation Protection Plan (SHOPP)

Asset Management Pilot Program

Michael B. Johnson P.E.State Asset Management Engineer

August 2015

Demands on SHOPP Funds (partial listing)Safety

Emergency Response Reactive safety Proactive safety

Health Active Transportation Reduce criteria pollutants

System Preservation Delay major repair – All

assets Fund relinquishments

System Rehabilitation Transportation assets Facilities

Sustainability Reduce VMT Improve Resiliency Climate change Environmental/wildlife

Livability Mode Choice/Bike/Ped Transportation Access Vista Points/Landscaping

Economy Facilitate Goods Movement Low income transportation

System Performance Improve travel reliability Reduce peak hour delay Real time driver information

SHOPP Funding Breakdown

Non Discretionary30%

Pavements 37%

Bridges14%

Culverts2%

ITS Elements4%

Proactive Safety9%

All Other Programs3%

Proposed 2016 SHOPP Funding

Silo Funding Performance ParadoxPavement Objective

Improve Pavement Condition

BenefitImproved PavementBenefit from other

work not well capturedActivities that cost

money and do not improve pavement condition are seen as lower priority

Non Dis-cre-tiona

ry30%

Pavements

37%

Bridges14%

Culvert

s2%

ITS El-

ements4%

Proactive Safety9%

All Othe

r Pro-grams3%

Asset Management Pilot ProgramMulti-objective project prioritization

Combined project benefits from all areas are combined together to determine the total benefit of a project

Utilizes data driven parameters that are well defined

Improved Transparency in project selection Single fund source programming

Eliminates the denial of scope by individual program focused on one primary objective

Multi-Objective DetailCaltrans Strategic Goal #1 – Safety and Health (Conceptual Example)

Safety and

Health

Multi-Objective WeightingWeighting of the Departments Strategic

Goals and Objectives (Conceptual)

Safety and Health

Safety

Health

Weighting

Weighting

Vehicle Safety

Bike/Ped/Worker Safety

Active Trans

Criteria Pollutants

Weighting

Weighting

Weighting

Weighting

Asset Management Pilot Program

Asset Management Pilot ObjectivesImproving our prioritization approach is a key Pilot

outcome. Capture the full project benefits

Independent economic evaluation (monetization)Feedback from all involved is essential to improve

going forwardHow did the multi-asset project approach work?Each evaluation team report how they rated the

projectsEach district report on lessons learned and

suggested improvementsExternal stakeholder feedback important (TAMAC)

Asset Management Pilot ProgramKey Information:

Nomination Due Date: Friday 8/14/15Must include at least 3 or more objectivesDelivery: 2018 SHOPP (2018/19-2021/22)Maximum Nomination Cost $3- $20 Million

Committed funds outside of program can supplement total project cost

Evaluation: Weighted value of five goal scores Plus independent economic evaluation Plus external stakeholder evaluation

Questions