Upload
clarissa-harper
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Metropolitan Fragmentation and Metropolitan Reform
Three Key Questions
What is Metro fragmentation?
What are the 2 positions regarding metro fragmentation?
What proposals have been offered to restructure the multi-centered metropolis and deal with fragmentation?
Fragmentation: Definition
The Proliferation of Local Governments in a Geographic Region (4 forms).– Increased # of Incorporated Communities– Overlapping of city and county functions– Existence of special districts– Extension of cross-state boundaries in MSA without
concern for state lines
Fragmentation in General: Median Metro Area
Total Number of Governments: 104– Counties: 2– Cities 24– Towns, townships 16– School Districts 19– Special Districts 43
Fragmentation in Clark County: # of Governments
County 1Cities 2Villages 9Townships 10School Districts 8 (inc. JVS)Special Districts 9– Total # of Governments= 39
Clark County Fragmentation in Comparison to All Ohio Counties
Total Number of Taxing Districts in Clark County = 57
Ave. number of Taxing Districts in Ohio’s 88 Counties = 50; range=18-133
Reformers (e.g., David Rusk)
Confusion in the responsibility for servicesReductions in political scrutiny and control (undemocratic)Political UnresponsivenessDuplication of EffortInequities in revenue and policyInefficiencies, therefore most costly
Decentralists (e.g., Charles Tiebout)
Suburban residents tend to be more concerned with incremental changesEfficiency is not the only value, e.g., access and lifestyle issuesPublic Choice School of ThoughtCentralization frustrates democracyLess costly due to smaller
Annexation Strategies
Most prevalent prior to WWI, but became harder due to stringent state laws requiring simultaneous majoritiesLargely a Southern and Southwestern phenomenon (extraterritorial jurisdiction, and spoke/finger annexation—Houston)
City-County Consolidation
Only 4 have occurred involving more than 250,000Again, a Southern phenomenon: Baton Rouge—3 service zones: urban, rural, industrialReasons for success:– Some basic service has not being provided, or had broken
down– Special political factors (corruption—Jacksonville, unpopular
politicians—Nashville, significant change in partisan leadership—Indianapolis)
– Small Number of incorporated suburbs
Strengthening Urban County Government
Problems with traditional county government—Row officersNeed for professional managementUse of more home rule charters: Broward County, FL (Ft. Lauderdale)
Two-Tier/Federative Reform
Basic notion is that the county will work on system-maintenance services and municipals will provide lifestyle services.Miami-Dade; Minneapolis-St. Paul; Portland
Incremental Options
Metropolitan Planning: Federal incentives and the A-95 processAdvocacy PlanningCouncils of Governments (COGs)Central City decentralization (Berry, Portney, & Thomsan)One size does not fit all. States must help.David Rusk: Win-win annexation