28
Inside this issue 2-5 Metro Vancouver news Local procurement; Sumas mine application; Refugees 6-10 Waste & recycling news Transfer station contracts; MMBC & Vancouver; food donation tax credit 11-14 Housing news Offshore buyers; Regional affordable housing strategy consultations SCI Update 2015-8 December 2, 2015 Metro Vancouver & TransLink Update Produced by the Sustainable Communities Initiative Robert Duffy, Coordinator [email protected] P3 Canada rejects Lions Gate Treatment Plant funding Staff told a November meeting of Metro’s Utilities Committee meeting that P3 Canada, the federal government public-private partnership agency, has rejected (‘screened-out’) Metro’s application for funding for the Lions Gate Secondary Treatment Plant. Staff say it appears the proposal was rejected because it was a traditional Design-Build-Finance (DBF) P3 and not the deeper “Design-Build-Finance- Maintain Operate” (DBFMO) model promoted by some P3 advocates. Metro staff and directors told the meeting that Metro is still pursuing funding through the federal Building Canada Fund (BCF), but needs the BC provincial government to recommend the project before the federal government will consider assessing it. After the rejection from P3 Canada, the BCF is currently the only federal funding program available to the project. The new federal government in November announced its intention to remove mandatory P3 screening from infrastructure funding applications under the Building Canada Fund (see page 25 for more information). Metro staff and elected people are planning to directly approach the new federal government and new North Shore MPs regarding project funding. Federal wastewater regulations require that the $700 million Lions Gate wastewater project is completed by 2020, with fines and other penalties threatened if local governments miss the deadline. Without senior government funding, the full cost of the project would be borne by Metro Vancouver municipalities. Still no confirmed federal or provincial funding for $700 million, federally mandated project 15-21 Transit & transportation news Shuttle bus replacement; Land value capture; Road pricing; New TransLink directors 22-23 Port news Inland ports; port trucking; Roberts Bank developments 24-27 The new federal government & Metro What the Liberals have promised on infrastructure, transit, housing and other municipal issues

Metro Vancouver & TransLink Update SCI Updateilwu.ca/wp-content/uploads/FINAL-SCI-2015-8.pdf · 2018. 8. 1. · involves an area within and adjacent to Sumas Mountain Interregional

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  •  

    Inside  this  issue  2-‐5       Metro  Vancouver  news  

    • Local  procurement;  Sumas  mine  application;  Refugees  

    6-‐10     Waste  &  recycling  news  

    • Transfer  station  contracts;  MMBC  &  Vancouver;  food  

    donation  tax  credit  

    11-‐14     Housing  news  

    • Offshore  buyers;  Regional  affordable  housing  strategy  

    consultations  

    SCI  Update  

    2015-‐8  

    December  2,  2015    

    Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update    

    Produced  by  the  Sustainable  

    Communities  Initiative  

    Robert  Duffy,  Coordinator  

    [email protected]    

    P3  Canada  rejects  Lions  Gate  Treatment  Plant  funding  

    Staff  told  a  November  meeting  of  

    Metro’s  Utilities  Committee  meeting  that  

    P3  Canada,  the  federal  government  

    public-‐private  partnership  agency,  has  

    rejected  (‘screened-‐out’)  Metro’s  

    application  for  funding  for  the  Lions  Gate  

    Secondary  Treatment  Plant.    

    Staff  say  it  appears  the  proposal  was  

    rejected  because  it  was  a  traditional  

    Design-‐Build-‐Finance  (DBF)  P3  and  not  

    the  deeper  “Design-‐Build-‐Finance-‐

    Maintain  Operate”  (DBFMO)  model  

    promoted  by  some  P3  advocates.    

    Metro  staff  and  directors  told  the  

    meeting  that  Metro  is  still  pursuing  

    funding  through  the  federal  Building  

    Canada  Fund  (BCF),  but  needs  the  BC  

    provincial  government  to  recommend  

    the  project  before  the  federal  

    government  will  consider  assessing  it.  

    After  the  rejection  from  P3  Canada,  the  

    BCF  is  currently  the  only  federal  funding  

    program  available  to  the  project.    

    The  new  federal  government  in  

    November  announced  its  intention  to  

    remove  mandatory  P3  screening  from  

    infrastructure  funding  applications  under  

    the  Building  Canada  Fund  (see  page  25  

    for  more  information).  Metro  staff  

    and  elected  people  are  planning  to  

    directly  approach  the  new  federal  

    government  and  new  North  Shore  

    MPs  regarding  project  funding.    

    Federal  wastewater  regulations  

    require  that  the  $700  million  Lions  

    Gate  wastewater  project  is  

    completed  by  2020,  with  fines  and  

    other  penalties  threatened  if  local  

    governments  miss  the  deadline.  

    Without  senior  government  

    funding,  the  full  cost  of  the  project  

    would  be  borne  by  Metro  

    Vancouver  municipalities.  

    Still  no  confirmed  federal  or  provincial  funding  for  $700  million,  federally  mandated  project    

    15-‐21   Transit  &  transportation  news  

    • Shuttle  bus  replacement;  Land  value  capture;  Road  

    pricing;  New  TransLink  directors  

    22-‐23   Port  news  

    • Inland  ports;  port  trucking;  Roberts  Bank  

    developments  

    24-‐27   The  new  federal  government  &  Metro    

    • What  the  Liberals  have  promised  on  infrastructure,  

    transit,  housing  and  other  municipal  issues  

  •   SCI  Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update:  2015-‐8  

    Procurement  committee  asks  for  more  data  on  

    impact  of  local  purchasing  

    Metro’s  performance  and  procurement  committee  is  asking  

    for  an  analysis  of  the  value  and  potential  economic  benefits  of  

    local  supplier  preferences  in  contracts  not  covered  in  existing  

    international  and  interprovincial  trade  agreements.  Local  

    government  procurement  contracts  below  $75,000  for  goods  

    and  services  or  $200,000  for  construction  are  not  covered  in  

    the  NWPTA  or  other  existing  trade  agreements.  Research  

    presented  to  the  committee  by  the  Columbia  Institute  showed  

    that  locally  based  suppliers  increased  local  employment  and  

    recirculated  more  money  in  the  local  economy.    

    A  Metro  staff  report  to  the  Procurement  and  Performance  

    Committee  in  November  said  that  despite  the  absence  of  any  

    local  preference  measures,  approximately  91%  of  all  Metro  

    Vancouver  purchases  (as  measured  in  total  dollars)  are  

    ordered  from  vendors  within  the  province  of  British  Columbia  

    and  approximately  83%  are  from  within  a  Metro  member  

    municipality.  Metro  Manager  of  Purchasing  Tracy  Husoy  was  

    of  the  opinion  that  these  figures  indicate  local  preferences  are  

    not  necessary  to  ensure  Metro  does  most  of  it’s  purchasing  

    locally.  However,  her  staff  report  defined  “local”  only  on  the  

    basis  of  whether  a  supplier  had  a  BC  mailing  address,  and  did  

    not  examine  the  extent  to  which  supplier  operations,  staff  

    and/or  production  were  actually  rooted  in  the  local  economy.    

    In  regards  to  policy,  Husoy  told  the  committee  that  a  survey  of  

    member  municipalities  found  that  none  have  a  local  

    preference  policy,  but  that  several  municipalities  have  a  

    “tie-‐breaker”  clause  within  their  policies  or  procedures.  

    Generally  a  tiebreaker  clause  states  that  where  quality,  

    specifications,  service,  price  and  delivery  are  all  equal,  

    preference  will  be  given  to  the  local  or  domestic  firm.    

    Vancouver  Director  Geoff  Meggs  expressed  concerns  

    that  even  if  a  majority  of  Metro’s  procurement  spend  is  

    currently  ‘local,’  international  firms  might  undercut  

    local  suppliers  over  the  longer  term,  leading  to  negative  

    impacts  on  the  regional  economy.  The  Vancouver  

    Councillor  suggested  that  Metro  staff  should  monitor  

    procurement  in  more  detail  over  time  to  see  if  new  

    trade  agreements  impact  the  extent  to  which  Metro  

    sources  goods  and  services  locally.  

    Meggs  also  suggested  greater  consideration  and  

    tracking  of  environmental  impacts  in  procurement  

    decisions,  including  GHG  emissions  from  transportation  

    of  goods.  Port  Moody  Mayor  Mike  Clay  told  the  

    committee  his  municipality  already  calculates  the  

    environmental  cost  of  transporting  goods  as  a  factor  on  

    scoresheets  for  its  procurement  process.  Husoy  

    indicated  that  some  of  these  factors  may  be  captured  

    already  under  Metro’s  calculation  of  ‘total  cost’  of  

    contracts,  but  didn’t  elaborate  in  detail.  

    Burnaby  Director  Colleen  Jordan  noted  that  more  

    detailed  information  on  the  current  value  of  Metro’s  

    local  procurement,  including  amounts  spent  on  

    Metro  Vancouver  News  

  •   3  

    contracts  below  trade  agreement  thresholds,  could  also  be  

    useful  economic  data  to  share  with  Boards  of  Trade  and  

    businesses  in  the  region.  

    The  committee  passed  a  motion  directing  staff  to  provide  

    more  detailed  analysis  of  Metro’s  procurement  on  contracts  

    below  current  trade  agreement  thresholds,  with  only  White  

    Rock  Mayor  Wayne  Baldwin  and  West  Vancouver  Mayor  

    Michael  Smith  voting  against.  

    For  more  on  the  value  of  local  procurement,  see:  

    http://goo.gl/xmhs0j  

    http://goo.gl/yskzv1    

     

    Mine  application  for  Sumas  Mountain  opposed  by  

    Metro  

    Metro’s  Parks  Committee  in  November  voted  to  write  a  

    letter  to  the  BC  Ministry  of  Energy  and  Mines  expressing  

    opposition  to  the  proposed  mining  lease  application  

    submitted  by  266531  BC  Ltd.  The  mining  lease  application  

    involves  an  area  within  and  adjacent  to  Sumas  Mountain  

    Interregional  Park.  Metro  staff  say  the  proposal  raises  

    serious  concerns  for  the  environmental  and  cultural  values  of  

    the  interregional  park,  as  well  as  for  the  public’s  use  and  

    enjoyment  of  the  parklands  and  trail  corridor.  

    Both  the  Fraser  Valley  Regional  District  and  City  of  

    Abbotsford  have  opposed  a  previous  mining  lease  

    application  for  a  proposed  rock  quarry.  The  Sumas  First  

    Nation  and  Sto:lo  Nation  also  participated  in  the  previous  

    delegation  to  Minister  Thomson.  At  its  October  19,  2015  

    meeting,  the  City  of  Abbotsford  Council  passed  a  resolution  

    to  express  the  City’s  opposition  to  the  current  lease  

    application  in  a  letter  to  the  Province.    

    In  response  to  questions  from  Directors,  staff  told  the  

    committee  that  the  GVRD  is  an  interested  party,  but  has  no  

    formal  jurisdiction  over  the  application.  The  Province  

    ultimately  makes  decisions  regarding  this  type  of  tenure.    

    Directors  expressed  concerns  regarding  the  lack  of  municipal  

    jurisdiction  over  mining  activities  within  BC  municipal  

    boundaries,  and  one  noted  that  mining  applications  are  

    often  made  just  below  the  tonnage  that  triggers  a  mandatory  

    environmental  review.  

    Following  the  discussion,  the  committee  instructed  staff  to  

    prepare  a  backgrounder  examining  GVRD  jurisdiction  over  

    mining  activities  in  the  region.  

     

    Water  restrictions  will  start  earlier  in  2016  and  

    full  shortage  plan  review  underway  

    In  response  to  the  2015  drought,  Metro  Vancouver’s  

    Utilities  Committee  has  voted  to  begin  Stage  1  water  

    restrictions  on  May  15  in  2016  and  extend  them  until  

    October  15.  Stage  1  restrictions  have  typically  run  from  

    June  1  –  September  30.    

    In  addition,  Metro  is  commencing  a  review  of  the  current  

    Water  Shortage  Response  Plan  (WSRP).  The  review  and  

    adoption  process  will  take  place  between  November  2015  

    and  April  2017,  and  involve  a  two  phased  consultation  

    program  with  GVWD  members,  neighbouring  jurisdictions,  

    the  private  sector  and  the  public.            

    In  spring  2016,  a  report  to  the  Board  is  expected  to  

    provide  further  WSRP  amendments  pertaining  to  

    commercial  power  washing  and  lawn  sprinkling  exemption  

    permit  validity  under  various  stages  of  the  plan.  A  detailed  

    WSRP  Support  Guide  will  be  available  for  summer  2016  to  

    support  the  implementation  and  enforcement  of  the  plan.  

     

    Metro  assessing  need  for  higher  Development  

    Cost  Charges  to  fund  future  sewage,  drainage  

    projects  

    Metro  is  currently  reviewing  Development  Cost  Charges  

    (DCCs)  levied  by  the  Greater  Vancouver  Sewerage  and  

    Drainage  District’s  to  determine  if  they’re  adequate  to  

    meet  future  capital  requirements.  

    Regional  GVS&DD  Development  Cost  Charges  are  

    collected  on  behalf  of  Metro  Vancouver  by  member  

    municipalities  and  remitted  twice  a  year.  DCCs  are  used  to  

    fund  growth  related  capital  expenditures.  About  $10.2  

    million  in  DCCs  were  collected  in  the  first  half  of  2015  

    A  staff  report  presented  at  the  November  2015  

    Performance  and  Procurement  Committee  meeting  noted:  

    “While  the  current  DCC  revenues  continue  to  be  

    substantial,  so  is  the  plan  for  future  Liquid  Waste  Services  

    growth  capital  works.  In  the  medium  term,  current  DCC  

    revenue  levels  as  well  as  the  deferred  revenues  appear  

    adequate.”    

     

     

     

  •   SCI  Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update:  2015-‐8  

    Metro  &  municipal  news  in  brief  

    Construction  partnership  claims  Metro  owes  more  than  $15  

    million  for  tunneling  work    

    The  Seymour-‐Cap  Partnership,  which  won  a  contract  worth  

    approximately  $190  million  for  tunneling  work  from  the  

    Greater  Vancouver  Water  District  (GVWD),  claims  the  GVWD  is  

    wrongfully  shortchanging  it  by  more  than  $15  million  after  the  

    work  was  substantially  completed.    

    The  partnership  is  made  up  of  Frontier-‐Kemper  Constructors  

    ULC,  Aecon  Construction  Group  and  J.F.  Shea  Construction  Inc.,  

    according  to  the  claim  filed  in  BC  Supreme  Court  on  November  

    3.    

    https://goo.gl/q11TCu    

     

    Tsawwasssen  First  Nation  proposes  major  LNG  export  plant    

    Members  of  the  Tsawwassen  First  Nation  will  vote  next  month  

    on  plans  for  a  liquefied  natural  gas  export  facility  on  their  lands  

    near  Delta.  

    The  First  Nation  has  issued  a  release  saying  consultation  with  

    its  members  is  under  way  before  a  vote  on  Dec.  16.  

    The  release  says  the  proposed  facility  would  produce  three  to  

    five  million  tonnes  of  LNG  annually,  with  the  natural  gas  supply  

    coming  via  an  extension  of  an  existing  pipeline  located  10  

    kilometres  away.  

    Five  to  six  tankers  per  month  would  be  expected  at  the  export  

    facility.  

    http://goo.gl/1oXCyQ    

     

    Vancouver  viaducts  to  come  down,  with  major  

    redevelopment  of  area  

    Vancouver  city  council  voted  in  October  to  take  the  down  the  

    Georgia  Street  viaducts  and  proceed  with  a  plan  to  create  a  

    new  arterial  roadway  that  allows  the  area  to  be  extensively  

    developed.  City  staff  expect  all  of  the  $200  million  cost  of  the  

    project  can  be  covered  by  development  fees.    

    The  plan  to  remove  the  viaducts  includes  an  increase  in  

    downtown  park  space.  It  also  includes  two  new  city  blocks  that  

    would  be  used  for  social  and  market  housing.  

    A  survey  from  Insights  West  found  that  36%  of  Metro  

    Vancouver  residents  support  the  decision,  while  40%  

    oppose  it.  Support  is  higher  in  the  City  of  Vancouver:  45%  of  

    Vancouver  residents  said  they  support  the  decision,  while  

    36%  oppose  it.    

    Poll  respondents  were  skeptical  that  affordable  housing  

    would  materialize  as  part  of  the  redevelopment,  with  85%  

    expressing  doubt.  

    Former  Vancouver  senior  planners  Larry  Beasley  and  Ralph  

    Sega  told  media  it’s  possible  to  overcome  that  public  

    cynicism  if  the  City  gets  the  public  involved  from  the  

    beginning,  is  open  about  who’s  getting  what,  and  

    encourages  staff  to  bargain  hard  with  developers.  

    The  viaducts  were  originally  built  in  1971  as  part  of  a  larger  

    proposed  freeway  through  East  Vancouver.  That  plan  was  

    scrapped  after  residents  protested.  

    http://goo.gl/YohsX0  

    https://goo.gl/EL1Ycr  

    http://goo.gl/3ANFCv    

     

    Port  Moody  borrowing  for  civic  repairs  

    Port  Moody  council  is  borrowing  $10.5  million  to  fix  city  

    infrastructure.    

    The  temporary  borrowing  bylaw  takes  advantage  of  the  

    Municipal  Finance  Authority's  temporary  borrowing  

    program  to  lock  in  the  loan  amount  once  the  projects  are  

    complete  and  the  true  cost  is  known.    

    The  money  is  needed  to  fund  urgent  repairs  to  city  hall,  the  

    recreation  complex  and  the  Port  Moody  Arts  Centre,  as  well  

    as  the  Heritage  Mountain  bridge.  The  city  has  received  

    provincial  approval  to  borrow  the  money  and,  after  a  30-‐

    day  public  comment  window,  will  seek  the  necessary  OKs  

    from  Metro  Vancouver  and  Municipal  Finance  Authority  

    boards.    

    http://goo.gl/rup6IJ    

     

  •   5  

    Metro  region  prepares  to  accept  Syrian  refugees  

    Decision  to  slow  down  arrivals  means  hundreds,  not  

    thousands,  here  by  Dec.  31  

    British  Columbia  can  now  expect  hundreds,  rather  than  

    thousands,  of  Syrian  refugees  by  the  end  of  the  year.    

    The  federal  Liberal  government  announced  November  24  

    that  it  will  take  in  10,000,  rather  than  25,000  Syrian  

    refugees  by  the  end  of  2015.  The  other  15,000  will  arrive  in  

    January  and  February.    

    Chris  Friesen,  settlement  services  director  with  the  

    Immigrant  Services  Society  of  B.C.,  said  that  of  the  10,000  

    Syrian  refugees  arriving  in  Canada  before  the  end  of  the  

    year,  about  8,000  will  be  privately  sponsored  and  only  2,000  

    will  be  government  sponsored.  

    The  Immigrant  Services  Society,  which  only  handles  

    government-‐sponsored  refugees,  is  expecting  about  10  per  

    cent  of  those  2,000,  or  200,  will  come  to  this  province  by  

    Dec.  31,  Friesen  said.  

    Government-‐assisted  refugees  will  begin  arriving  in  more  

    significant  numbers  in  the  New  Year,  Friesen  said.  Metro  

    Vancouver  is  the  only  area  in  B.C.  set  up  to  receive  these  

    refugees,  who  may  have  endured  significant  trauma  and  

    need  support  services  that  cannot  easily  be  offered  in  other  

    cities,  Friesen  said.  The  extension  “makes  it  more  doable”  

    and  gives  the  Immigrant  Services  Society  more  time  to  train  

    and  screen  volunteers,  as  well  as  take  stock  of  all  the  

    housing  units  that  B.C.  residents  have  offered  to  Syrian  

    refugees,  he  said.  

    Analysis  by  Immigrant  Services  of  refugee  settlement  

    patterns  over  the  past  decade  suggests  three  quarters  of  

    the  new  Syrian  arrivals  will  end  up  in  Surrey,  Coquitlam  and  

    Burnaby.  Vancouver  and  New  Westminster  round  out  the  

    top  five  destinations  in  B.C.    

    While  Premier  Christy  Clark  has  suggested  settling  many  of  

    the  refugees  outside  the  Lower  Mainland,  refugee  

    settlement  groups  said  it  likely  makes  more  sense  to  keep  

    them  in  areas  with  appropriate  services.    

    “What  are  the  existing  infrastructure,  where  are  the  best  

    infrastructure  to  support  in  their  initial  settlement?”  asked  

    Eyob  Naizghi,  Executive  Director  of  MOSAIC  BC.  “The  Lower  

    Mainland  is  going  to  be  the  best  place  to  accept  refugees.”  

    Metro  local  elected  leaders  have  expressed  support  for  the  

    effort,  but  emphasized  the  need  for  adequate  federal  

    and  provincial  support  in  housing,  settlement,  social  

    services  and  the  public  education  system.  Close  to  40%  

    of  refugees  are  likely  to  be  under  the  age  of  19.  

    Surrey  councillor  Judy  Villeneuve  told  media  her  city  is  

    waiting  to  see  how  many  Syrian  refugees  will  be  directed  

    there,  and  will  work  with  Immigrant  Services,  B.C.  

    Housing  and  Surrey-‐based  immigrant  services  

    organizations  to  find  them  a  place  to  go.  It’s  something  

    the  city  has  been  doing  for  a  long  time,  she  added.    

    “I’m  not  saying  it’s  going  to  be  easy.  We  do  have  people  

    who  have  privately  sponsored  refugees  and  may  open  

    up  their  homes.  We  have  churches  and  community  

    groups  that  will  ...  assist  with  looking  for  housing.  Surrey  

    is  a  really  connected  community  that  will  work  

    together.”    

    Vancouver  councillor  Geoff  Meggs  called  the  Syrian  

    arrivals  “an  exciting  challenge”  and  a  topic  that  came  up  

    in  the  first  telephone  conversation  Mayor  Gregor  

    Robertson  had  with  Justin  Trudeau  after  he  became  

    prime  minister.  

    “I  think  people  have  been  waiting  for  the  opportunity  to  

    lend  a  hand,”  Meggs  said.    

    In  mid-‐November,  the  Urban  Development  Institute  

    urged  its  120  local  members  in  the  property  

    development  sector  to  contact  the  Immigrant  Services  

    Society  of  B.C.  if  they  have  any  vacant  units  that  could  

    be  used  as  temporary  housing  for  large  groups  between  

    December  and  sometime  in  March  or  April,  or  for  

    permanent  housing.  At  least  two  Metro  area  developers  

    have  volunteered  housing  units  so  far.  

    http://goo.gl/g0LNky  

    http://goo.gl/P6uTGl  

    http://goo.gl/bNExcC  

    http://goo.gl/vz7CPl  

    http://goo.gl/1W13a3  

    http://goo.gl/lHb6bd  

     

  •   SCI  Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update:  2015-‐8  

    Metro  Waste  &  Recycling  News  

    Metro  motion  supports  federal  tax  incentive  

    to  donate  unsold  edible  food  

    Food  banks  concerned  that  such  programs  may  lead  to  

    industry  offloading  food  waste  disposal  costs  onto  charities  

    The  Metro  Board  in  November  passed  a  resolution  supporting  

    the  National  Zero  Waste  Council's  (NZWC)  food  waste  

    reduction  federal  tax  incentive  proposal.  The  proposal  calls  on  

    the  Government  of  Canada  to  implement  tax  incentives  for  

    food  producers,  suppliers  and  retailers  to  donate  unsold  edible  

    food.    

    However,  in  response  to  concerns  raised  by  a  delegation  from  

    the  Greater  Vancouver  Food  bank,  the  motion  was  amended  to  

    call  on  the  NZWC  to  do  research  to  ensure  that  the  proposal  

    was  designed  not  to  dump  poor  quality  foods  and  waste  

    disposal  costs  on  the  non-‐profit  sector.  

    According  to  the  staff  report  accompanying  the  proposal,  

    “approximately  170,000  tonnes  of  edible  food—equivalent  to  

    about  300  million  meals—wind  up  in  Canadian  landfills  every  

    year.”  The  NZWC  is  proposing  a  tax  incentive  to  assist  in  

    reducing  the  amount  of  edible  food  in  the  waste  stream,  and  

    subsequently,  “reduce  solid  waste  management  costs  and  the  

    environmental  and  social  impacts  related  to  the  loss  of  edible  

    food  to  communities  across  Canada.”  A  number  of  other  

    Canadian  local  governments  have  passed  resolutions  in  

    response  to  the  NZWC  campaign.  

    However,  a  delegation  to  Metro  from  the  Greater  Vancouver  

    Food  Bank  (GVFB)  warned  of  potential  problems  with  the  

    proposal,  and  called  on  the  Board  not  to  approve  the  motion  

    without  further  study  and  clarification.  GVFB  CEO  Aart  

    Schuurman  Hess  told  the  Board  that  if  not  designed  and  

    regulated  properly,  a  tax  credit  could  result  in  companies  

    dumping  low  quality  food  and  inedible  food  waste  onto  

    charitable  organisations,  which  would  then  be  in  a  position  of  

    absorbing  the  disposal  costs.  Hess  said  the  GVFB  already  

    spends  $40,000  a  year  recycling  and  disposing  of  inedible  food  

    it  receives.  

    Hess  said  there  are  also  considerable  costs  associated  with  

    handling  and  storing  food  donations,  and  that  distributing  poor  

    quality,  low  nutrition  foods  only  compounds  problems  for  

    people  living  in  poverty.  To  illustrate  his  point,  Hess  pointed  to  

    examples  of  big  box  stores  ‘donating’  large  quantities  of  

    expired  marshmallows  and  ice  cream  toppings  in  

    jurisdictions  where  they  received  tax  incentives  to  do  so.  

    Hess  suggested  finalizing  guidelines  for  industry  donations  

    before  calling  for  tax  incentives,  and  the  GVFB  wants  a  

    change  to  the  wording  of  the  motion  to  swap  the  term  

    "edible  food"  to  "healthy  and  nutritional  food."  Hess  

    suggested  that  the  Board  receive  the  staff  report  on  food  

    donation  incentives  for  ‘information  only’  until  these  issues  

    are  addressed.    

    Metro  Board  members  agreed  with  many  of  the  concerns  

    raised  by  Hess,  but  were  divided  on  whether  to  move  ahead  

    with  the  motion  and  address  problematic  issues  later  in  the  

    design  phase  of  a  program,  or  to  instead  hold  off  on  passing  

    a  motion  until  clearer  guidelines  and  standards  were  

    developed  and  could  be  included  in  a  modified  motion.    

    New  Westminster  Director  Jonathan  Cote  successfully  

    proposed  an  amendment  calling  on  the  NZWC  to  do  

    research  into  how  a  food  donations  tax  incentive  could  best  

    be  designed  to  benefit  end  recipients  of  food  donations  and  

    avoid  the  types  of  problems  raised  by  the  GVFB.  The  

    resolution  passed  as  amended,  but  a  number  of  Directors  

    voted  against  the  motion  because  of  continued  concerns  

    related  to  the  issues  raised  by  the  food  bank  delegation.  

    http://goo.gl/dBZ7SF    

  •   7  

    Transfer  station  contracts  raise  concerns  for  some  Metro  Directors  

    Metro  Zero  Waste  Committee  members  raised  concerns  during  

    discussions  of  criteria  for  evaluating  proposals  for  operations  

    and  maintenance  at  the  Surrey,  North  Shore,  Langley  and  

    Maple  Ridge  transfer  stations.  

    Background  

    The  operation  of  Metro  Vancouver’s  transfer  station  system  is  

    currently  contracted  to  Wastech  Services  Ltd.  and  SSG  Holdings  

    Ltd.  Both  contracts  will  expire  on  December  31,  2016.  Services  

    are  being  procured  through  competitive  processes  “designed  

    to  ensure  value  for  money,  effective  operations  and  open  

    competition.”    

    Shortlisted  Proponents  who  will  be  allowed  to  submit  

    proposals  to  operate  and  maintain  the  Surrey  and  North  Shore  

    Transfer  Stations  are:    

    1. Covanta  Burnaby  Renewable  Energy,  ULC      

    2. Emterra  Environmental  (Halton  Recycling  Ltd.)      

    3. Miller  Waste  Systems  Inc.      

    4. SSG  Holdings  Ltd.      

    5. Wastech  Services  Ltd.      

    An  additional  Request  for  Proposals  for  Langley  and  Maple  

    Ridge  Transfer  Stations  will  be  issued  at  the  same  time.  A  

    prequalification  stage  was  not  required  for  the  Langley  and  

    Maple  Ridge  Transfer  Stations  because  the  scale  and  

    complexity  of  those  transfer  stations  is  less  than  Surrey  and  

    North  Shore.    

    Proposed  evaluation  criteria  and  weighting  for  RFPs  

    submitted  for  the  stations  include:  

    • Surrey  and  North  Shore  Transfer  Stations:    

    • Technical  (40%)  

    o  Structure  and  composition  of  the  operations  

    team  of  personnel      

    o Start-‐up  plan      

    o Operations  and  maintenance  methodology      

    • Financial  and  Commercial  (60%)  

    o Pricing,  including  total  estimated  annual  cost      

    o Financial  capability,  including  confirmation  

    that  the  proponent  has  the  ability  to  meet  

     specified  insurance  and  bonding  requirements    

    o Acceptance  of,  or  requested  changes  to,  the  

    draft  contract  attached  to  the  RFP      

  •   SCI  Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update:  2015-‐8  

    • Langley  and  Maple  Ridge  Transfer  Stations:    

    • Technical  (30%)  –  criteria  as  in  above  

    • Financial  and  Commercial  (40%)  –  criteria  as  in  above  

    • Qualifications  (30%):    

    o Experience  of  proponent      

    o Experience  of  proponent’s  personnel      

    o  Legislative  and  regulatory  compliance    

    o References      

    Concerns  raised  at  Committee  

    Several  directors  voiced  concerns  as  to  whether  risk  should  be  

    weighted  more  heavily  in  the  criteria,  especially  in  regards  to  

    any  litigation  or  past  problems  with  project  proponents.  Staff  

    told  the  committee  that  they  would  have  to  go  in  camera  to  

    discuss  that  issue.  

    Burnaby  Mayor  Derek  Corrigan  asked  staff  whether  an  analysis  

    had  been  done  about  whether  to  bring  these  operations  in-‐

    house,  and  voiced  concerns  about  the  7-‐year  length  of  the  

    contracts.  Metro  staff  replied  that  they  had  evaluated  and  

    apparently  rejected  the  possibility  of  keeping  these  projects  in  

    house,  and  argued  that  7  years  was  a  reasonable  time  for  

    amortization  of  equipment  to  be  purchased  by  contractors.  

    Staff  told  the  committee  the  contracts  include  only  the  costs  

    of  mobile  equipment  owned  by  contractors,  and  no  other  

    capital  costs.    

    Director  Corrigan  also  suggested  that  the  region  would  be  

    better-‐served  by  more  flexibility  for  Metro  on  how  these  

    contracts  deal  with  changing  waste  flows,  equipment  and  

    labour  requirements.  The  Burnaby  Mayor  felt  that  previous  

    contracts  have  been  weighted  in  favour  of  the  contractors  

    in  such  circumstances.  Staff  told  the  committee  that  waste  

    flow  issues  have  historically  been  dealt  with  through  a  

    combination  of  fixed  baseline  payments,  coupled  with  

    payments  based  on  flow.  

    Corrigan  also  expressed  concerns  about  the  varied  

    operating  hours  planned  for  different  transfer  stations,  and  

    suggested  that  more  consistent  operating  hours  for  

    facilities  across  the  region  would  be  more  convenient  for  

    the  public.  Staff  told  the  committee  that  the  variations  in  

    opening  hours  were  largely  due  to  some  stations  opening  

    early  to  accept  waste  from  commercial  haulers.  In  

    response,  Mayor  Corrigan  voiced  concerns  that  Metro  was  

    spending  public  funds  to  meet  the  scheduling  needs  of  

    commercial  haulers.  Staff  felt  that  the  mixture  of  reductions  

    and  extensions  of  hours  across  different  facilities  roughly  

    balanced  out  in  terms  of  cost,  at  least  in  relation  to  previous  

    arrangements.  

    What  next?  

    The  contracts  have  an  estimated  total  annual  value  of  

    approximately  $10  million  -‐  high  enough  to  require  Metro  

    Board  of  Directors  approval.  RFPs  are  expected  to  be  issued  

    before  the  end  of  2015  and  close  in  the  second  quarter  of  

    2016,  with  a  Report  to  the  Board  for  approval  to  award  

    contract  in  the  second  quarter  of  2016.  Contractors  are  

    expected  to  commence  operations  on  January  2,  2017.      

  •   9  

    Metro  to  release  short  list  of  WTE  incinerator  sites  ‘before  

    Christmas’  

    Metro  Vancouver  expects  to  announce  shortly  a  list  of  six  

    sites  for  one  or  more  waste-‐to-‐energy  plants  to  burn  the  

    region’s  trash,  more  than  two  years  after  the  regional  

    district  started  investigating  potential  land  options  in  and  

    outside  the  region.  

    Malcolm  Brodie,  chairman  of  Metro’s  waste  committee,  

    said  the  list  will  be  released  “before  Christmas”  but  

    declined  to  reveal  further  details  as  some  of  the  deals  are  

    still  being  negotiated.  

    http://goo.gl/zORCMO    

     

    Metro  composting  company  seeks  permit  for  higher  

    emissions    

    Organics  composter  Harvest  Power  is  seeking  an  air  quality  

    permit  to  increase  its  “authorized  emissions”  after  

    significantly  exceeding  air  and  odour  emissions  for  the  

    past  two  years.    

    The  Richmond-‐based  company,  which  composts  most  of  

    Metro  Vancouver’s  food  scraps,  has  asked  the  regional  

    district  to  approve  a  permit  based  on  “characterization  

    studies”  over  the  past  two  years  that  show  emissions  

    were  more  significant  than  expected,  in  some  cases  11  

    times  higher  for  certain  compounds.    

    Harvest  Power  operates  five  locations  in  Metro  

    Vancouver  with  a  combined  capacity  to  take  in  200,000  

    tonnes  of  organic  waste  each  year.  The  company  collects  

    most  of  the  compost  generated  by  Metro  Vancouver,  

    which  has  banned  kitchen  scraps  from  garbage  cans,  as  

    part  of  a  plan  to  divert  80  per  cent  of  compost  and  

    recyclables  from  the  region’s  landfills  by  2020.    

    http://goo.gl/rKjuUK    

    Waste  &  recycling  news  in  brief  

  •   SCI  Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update:  2015-‐8  

    Asbestos  problem  means  transfer  stations  temporarily  not  

    accepting  gypsum  

    Worksafe  BC’s  temporary  closure  of  New  West  Gypsum  due  

    to  asbestos  related  worker  safety  concerns  means  that  Metro  

    transfer  stations  are  currently  not  accepting  gypsum.  

    Metro  Vancouver’s  transfer  stations  typically  receive  small  

    loads  of  gypsum  for  recycling,  and  material  currently  in  the  

    system  is  being  stockpiled  on  site  at  Metro  Vancouver  

    facilities.  Safety  and  Worksafe  compliance  issues  mean  that  

    Metro  facilities  cannot  accept  more  gypsum  for  stockpiling.  

    In  addition,  the  closure  means  that  contractors  with  large  

    quantities  of  gypsum  are  not  able  to  deliver  the  material  for  

    recycling.  Metro  staff  report  that  the  current  lack  of  recycling  

    options  creates  risks  with  respect  to  illegal  dumping  and  

    mixing  of  gypsum  with  regular  garbage.  Gypsum  creates  

    operational  and  environmental  challenges  for  both  landfills  

    (particularly  landfills  in  high  moisture  environments)  and  the  

    Waste-‐to-‐Energy  Facility.    

    Prior  to  the  1980s,  asbestos  was  included  in  dry-‐wall  mud  

    used  in  the  installation  of  gypsum  wallboard  and  in  some  

    texture  materials  applied  to  wallboard.  New  West  Gypsum  is  

    a  Metro  Vancouver  based  company  that  is  a  major  North  

    American  player  in  the  gypsum  recycling  industry.    Metro  

    staff  say  they  will  continue  to  monitor  the  situation.  

     

    City  of  Vancouver  votes  to  fully  transition  recycling  

    collection  to  MMBC    

    The  City  of  Vancouver  has  voted  to  shift  its  residential  

    recycling  collection  directly  to  Multi-‐Material  BC  (MMBC),  the  

    industry  packaging  and  printed  paper  steward  that  began  

    operations  in  spring  of  2014.    

    On  Nov.  17,  city  staff  presented  the  ins  and  outs  of  a  full  

    service  transition  to  MMBC,  a  move  that  would  need  to  make  

    considerations  for  several  factors,  including  funding  shortfalls  

    and  aging  waste  fleets.  Payments  from  MMBC  do  not  cover  

    the  full  cost  of  Vancouver’s  collection  service  delivery,  and  in  

    2015,  the  shortfall  between  MMBC  revenues  and  program  

    costs  may  exceed  $4  million,  according  to  a  committee  

    report.  Further,  Vancouver  currently  owns  and  operates  a  

    fleet  of  30  recycling  trucks  that  staff  say  have  aged  beyond  

    their  useful  service  life  and  are  in  “urgent”  need  of  

    replacement,  a  cost  that  could  reach  about  $12  million.    

    According  to  a  City  of  Vancouver  staff  report,  “all  

    permanent  staff  affected  by  this  change  will  be  re-‐

    deployed  to  new  positions  and  vacancies  arising  through  

    regular  attrition  within  Sanitation  and  other  Engineering  

    branches.  A  significant  majority  of  the  impacted  staff  are  

    represented  by  CUPE  1004.  The  City  has  concluded  a  labour  

    adjustment  agreement  that  sets  out  the  terms  and  process  

    for  re-‐deployment  for  affected  CUPE  1004  members.  The  

    leadership  of  CUPE  1004  has  endorsed  this  agreement  and  

    is  presently  conducting  a  final  consultation  with  its  

    membership.”    

    Vancouver  and  MMBC  expect  the  full  transition  of  service  

    to  be  completed  by  the  end  of  2016.    

    http://goo.gl/yL2E23  

    http://goo.gl/llvtYZ  

    http://goo.gl/1H3NFO    

     

    Metro  to  regulate  liquid  waste  from  breweries  and  

    distilleries    

    Metro  Vancouver  has  passed  the  first-‐ever  bylaw  to  

    regulate  liquid  waste  coming  from  the  dozens  of  breweries  

    and  distilleries  in  the  region.    

    At  a  November  meeting,  the  regional  government  passed  a  

    bylaw  amendment  with  requirements  to  protect  sewage,  

    treatment  processes  and  the  environment  from  biosolids  

    from  breweries,  wineries  and  distilleries.    

    The  new  requirements  include  a  prohibition  on  discharging  

    spent  grains  and  fruits,  installing  a  sampling  point,  

    monitoring  and  treating  wastewater  pH,  and  to  pay  

    administration  and  treatment  fees.  The  requirements  have  

    deadlines  extending  from  2016  to  2017  to  allow  time  for  

    stakeholders  to  make  necessary  changes.    

    http://goo.gl/hFNRss    

  •   11  

    Housing  &  affordability  news  

    A  study  released  in  October  by  UBC  adjunct  professor  and  

    urban  planner  Andy  Yan  found  evidence  suggesting  

    significant  involvement  in  the  overheated  Vancouver  

    residential  real  estate  market  of  buyers  from  Mainland  China.    

    Canada  does  not  collect  data  on  foreign  ownership,  and  the  

    citizenship  of  buyers  in  Yan’s  study  is  not  clear.  However,  in  

    an  effort  to  estimate  the  presence  of  offshore  money  from  

    Mainland  China  in  the  market,  Yan  established  that  66%  of  all  

    buyers  of  detached  homes  on  Vancouver’s  west  side  from  

    August  2014-‐February  2015  had  “non-‐anglicized”  Mainland  

    China  names.  

    The  study  also  found  that  of  all  self-‐declared  occupations  

    among  owners  —  on  homes  worth  an  average  $3.05  million  

    —  36%  were  housewives  or  students  with  little  income.  In  

    addition,  18%  of  the  homes  were  not  mortgaged  by  banks,  

    including  five  of  the  eight  homes  owned  by  “students,”  which  

    were  bought  outright  with  cash  at  an  average  value  of  $3.2  

    million.    

    Yan  told  media  that  rather  than  the  ethnicity  of  the  buyers,  

    “the  bigger  question  to  be  studied  is  what  happens  when  the  

    driver  for  your  residential  market  is  wealth,  not  wages?  That  

    is  a  major  public  policy  issue.”    

    Vancouver-‐Point  Grey  MLA  David  Eby  told  media  that  Yan’s  

    findings  mean  the  provincial  government  needs  to  take  a  

    closer  look  at  the  tax  and  housing  implications  of  offshore  

    investment  in  the  housing  market.  

    Racist  implications  to  research?  

    Some  local  elected  leaders  have  expressed  concerns  about  

    the  study  being  misused  to  foment  racism,  with  Vancouver  

    Mayor  Gregor  Robertson  stating  “what  we  don’t  need  ...  is  

    the  blaming  of  any  one  group  of  people  —  or  any  one  kind  of  

    last  name  —  for  the  challenge  of  housing  affordability.  This  is  

    a  public  policy  issue,  not  a  race  issue  —  and  any  confusion  to  

    the  contrary  only  risks  dividing  our  city  and  distracting  

    Vancouver  and  our  region  from  seeking  the  urgent  action  

    that  is  needed  from  the  provincial  and  federal  

    governments.”    

    Vancouver  council  is  calling  on  the  B.C.  government  to  

    implement  an  anti-‐speculation  tax  on  high-‐end  properties  

    and  to  limit  “excessive  vacancies”  in  unoccupied  houses.    

    Yan’s  research  and  methodology  was  defended  by  a  

    number  of  academic  and  public  figures,  including  Albert  Lo,  

    head  of  the  Canadian  Race  Relations  Foundation  (CRRF);  

    Prof.  Michael  McDonald,  former  head  of  the  University  of  

    B.C.’s  centre  for  applied  ethics;  Setty  Pendakur,  UBC  

    planner  emeritus,  former  Vancouver  city  councilor  and  

    senior  adviser  to  Mainland  China’s  State  Council;  and  

    Vancouver  immigration  lawyer  Samuel  Hyman.  

    Albert  Lo  of  the  CRRF  told  media  “there  are  racists  out  there  

    who  will  exploit  this  to  advance  their  bigotries.  But  it’s  

    important  to  respectfully  and  honestly  look  at  all  the  issues  

    surrounding  housing.  There  is  no  problem  collecting  

    statistical  information  on  nationality,  as  long  as  you  don’t  

    target  one  group.”    

    http://goo.gl/y33zLT  

    http://goo.gl/uTYKYO  

    http://goo.gl/TgezG2  

     

    BC  residents  dissatisfied  with  provincial  government  

    handing  of  foreign  ownership  of  housing  

    The  year-‐end  Insights  West  “BC  Government  Report  Card,”  

    an  online  survey  of  a  representative  sample  of  British  

    Columbian  adults  conducted  in  partnership  with  Business  in  

    Vancouver,  found  that  just  12%  of  BC  residents  are  satisfied  

    with  the  way  the  provincial  government  is  handling  issues  

    related  to  foreign  ownership  in  housing.    

    http://goo.gl/56olup    

    Debate  continues  over  role  of  offshore  money  in  Vancouver  housing  market  

  •   SCI  Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update:  2015-‐8  

    BC  Landlords  association  says  government  action  needed  to  

    increase  Metro’s  supply  of  affordable  housing  

    The  CEO  of  the  rental  housing  industry  association  LandlordBC  

    told  Metro’s  housing  committee  in  November  that  

    government  action  is  needed  to  increase  the  construction  of  

    new  purpose  built  rental  housing.  David  Hutniak  said  that  

    much  of  the  region’s  rental  housing  stock  is  aging  and  in  need  

    of  renovation  and  repair,  and  that  the  market  on  its  own  was  

    not  building  affordable  rental  housing.  He  told  the  committee  

    that  the  region  could  not  wait  for  the  ‘normal’  10-‐year  

    development  cycle  to  catch  up  with  the  current  housing  crisis.  

    However,  Hutniak  told  the  committee  he  felt  that  the  for-‐

    profit  sector  can  provide  affordable  housing  more  effectively  

    than  the  public  sector.  He  advocated  ‘affordable  housing  

    allowances’  and  other  forms  of  direct  financial  assistance  to  

    renters  until  the  private  sector  housing  supply  ‘catches  up,’  

    rather  than  construction  of  new  public  social  housing.    

    Hutniak  was  not  explicit  on  measures  to  increase  the  supply  of  

    Housing  &  Metro  Vancouver  

    affordable  rental  housing,  but  favourably  mentioned  past  

    tax  incentives  for  rental  housing  construction.  He  also  

    spoke  favourably  of  density  bonuses  and  development  

    charge  waivers  by  local  governments  as  incentives.  In  

    addition,  Hutniak  said  his  organisation  was  not  in  favour  

    of  local  government  policy  measures  aimed  at  preventing  

    ‘renovictions,’  arguing  that  the  problem  was  overstated  

    and  that  government  intervention  could  get  in  the  way  of  

    necessary  renovations.  

    In  response  to  questions  from  the  committee,  Hutniak  

    said  that  he  had  not  heard  about  any  specific  measures  

    from  the  new  federal  government  to  support  rental  

    housing,  but  that  his  sector  hoped  to  meet  soon  with  

    federal  representatives.  He  also  told  the  committee  that  

    his  organisation  was  concerned  about  the  loss  of  rental  

    housing  to  AirBNB,  and  was  working  to  educate  members  

    on  that  issue.  

  •   13  

    Consultations  on  Regional  Affordable  Housing  Strategy  

    underway  

    Consultations  on  Metro’s  Draft  Regional  Affordable  Housing  

    Strategy  with  member  municipalities’  Mayor  and  Councils  and  

    other  stakeholders  will  be  taking  place  from  November  2015  

    to  end  of  January  2016.    

    Stakeholder  consultation  is  occurring  in  two  parts  -‐  with  

    Mayor  and  Councils  of  member  municipalities  and  external  

    stakeholders.  Staff  will  report  back  to  the  Housing  Committee  

    with  a  summary  of  stakeholder  feedback  in  early  2016.    

    Member  Municipalities  

    Mayor  and  Councils  will  have  an  opportunity  to  consider  the  

    draft  strategy  and  provide  Metro  Vancouver  with  their  

    comments.  The  Draft  Regional  Affordable  Housing  Strategy  

    will  be  sent  directly  to  Mayor  and  Councils  in  early  November  

    inviting  their  comments  by  January  29,  2016.  Accompanying  

    the  Draft  Regional  Affordable  Housing  Strategy  will  be  some  

    associated  technical  documentation,  namely  draft  housing  

    demand  estimates  and  performance  measures.    

    External  stakeholders  

    Three  sub-‐regional  workshops  were  held  for  invited  

    stakeholders  at  the  staff  level,  including  the  Regional  

    Administrators  Advisory  Committee  members,  Regional  

    Planning  Advisory  Committee  members,  housing  and  

    community  agency  stakeholders,  TransLink,  private  and  non-‐

    profit  housing  developers,  industry  associations,  the  

    provincial  government,  federal  government  and  health  

    authorities.  The  aim  of  the  workshops  was  to  solicit  views  

    on  the  draft  strategy.    

    There  is  no  direct  public  engagement,  but  there  is  an  

    ongoing  web  presence  on  the  Metro  Vancouver  website.  

    The  webpage  advises  the  interested  public  to  contact  staff  

    if  they  have  questions  or  comments  on  the  draft  RAHS.    

    http://goo.gl/AHxPNn    

     

    Report  in  progress  on  “what  works”  for  increasing  rental  

    housing  supply    

    Regional  Housing  staff  are  preparing  a  “What  Works”  

    document  on  specific  measures  to  sustain  and  expand  

    purpose  built  rental  supply.  “What  Works:  Sustaining  and  

    Expanding  the  Purpose  Built  Rental  Housing  Supply”  builds  

    on  an  earlier  report  published  in  2012  to  identify  municipal  

    and  other  measures  to  sustain  the  existing  purpose  built  

    rental  stock  and  incentivize  the  development  of  new  

    purpose-‐built  rental  housing.  The  report  will  summarize  

    the  effectiveness  of  local  government  tools  and  measures  

    as  well  as  levers  used  by  senior  levels  of  government.  

    Tenant  displacement  through  redevelopment  is  a  major  

    issue  and  methods  to  accommodate  this  will  be  discussed.  

    This  resource  guide  will  come  to  Housing  Committee  for  

    endorsement  in  the  New  Year.    

  •   SCI  Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update:  2015-‐8  

    Housing  news  in  brief  

    City  of  North  Vancouver  adds  new  protections  for  renters  

    The  City  of  North  Vancouver  council  on  Nov.  16  unanimously  

    endorsed  a  new  policy  that  offers  more  protection  for  those  

    displaced  by  redevelopment.  

    The  policy  endorsed  by  council  requires  property  owners  to  

    provide  enhanced  notice  and  assistance  to  tenants  for  any  

    redevelopment  requiring  council  approval.  Under  the  new  

    policy,  building  owners  must  provide:  an  occupancy  

    summary;  two  months’  notice;  three  months’  rent;  tenant  

    communications  plan;  tenant  relocation  co-‐ordinator  to  find  

    three  comparable  suites  for  the  displaced  tenants,  and  give  

    existing  tenants  the  first  right  of  refusal  to  live  in  the  new  

    building.  

    As  staff  noted,  residential  tenancy  requirements  and  tenant-‐

    landlord  relations  in  British  Columbia  are  governed  by  the  

    provincial  government’s  Residential  Tenancy  Act  and  the  city  

    doesn’t  have  the  power  to  require  developers  to  offer  

    additional  notice  or  financial  compensation.  However,  the  

    policy  measures  can  be  used  as  a  requirement  of  council  

    approval  for  redevelopment.  

    http://goo.gl/QUVrEt    

     

    Affordable  rental  housing  crisis  threatening  B.C.  economy:  

    study    

    The  lack  of  affordable  rental  housing  in  British  Columbia  has  

    reached  such  a  crisis  point  it  is  threatening  to  damage  the  

    economy,  a  new  study  indicates.    

    Tony  Roy,  CEO  of  the  BC  Non-‐Profit  Housing  Association,  said  

    data  gathered  in  the  most  comprehensive  study  of  rental  

    housing  ever  done  in  the  province  show  that  nearly  half  of  all  

    renters  are  pouring  more  than  30  per  cent  of  their  income  

    into  rent.  And  24  per  cent  in  Metro  Vancouver  are  spending  

    more  than  half  their  income  on  rent,  leaving  them  with  little  

    disposable  income.    

    "And  our  figures  are  gross  incomes,"  said  Mr.  Roy.  "So  if  you  

    are  spending  30  per  cent  to  40  per  cent  on  taxes  and  another  

    50  per  cent  on  rent  it  doesn't  leave  much  to  do  anything  in  

    the  economy.  All  you  can  do  is  keep  a  roof  over  your  head  

    and  then  visit  the  food  bank  a  few  times  a  month  to  try  and  

    make  it  through.  And  that's  what's  happening."    

    Combined  with  a  vacancy  rate  of  less  than  1  per  cent,  that  

    means  businesses  are  increasingly  finding  it  hard  to  hire  new  

    workers  because  many  people  simply  can't  afford  to  live  

    in  B.C.,  particularly  in  Metro  Vancouver,  Mr.  Roy  said.    

    http://goo.gl/0cjOeW  

    http://goo.gl/5ndF46  

    http://goo.gl/CzYyWc  

    http://goo.gl/xxa09X    

     

    Bernanke  suggests  Canada  require  higher  down  

    payments  to  cool  housing  market  

    Ben  Bernanke,  the  former  chair  of  the  U.S.  Federal  

    Reserve,  said  Canada  should  consider  “requiring  higher  

    down  payments”  to  cool  the  housing  market.  

    According  to  Bernanke,  the  risk  is  not  so  much  that  

    house  prices  will  go  down  and  have  an  impact  on  jobs,  

    construction  and  the  economy,  but  “the  real  threat  is  to  

    the  financial  system.”    

    https://goo.gl/rOzEYK    

     

    House  prices  continue  to  surge  in  Greater  Vancouver    

    House  prices  continue  to  surge  in  the  greater  Vancouver  

    area,  where  the  price  of  a  typical  single-‐family  home  has  

    risen  by  20  per  cent  in  the  last  year,  hitting  $1.2  million  

    in  October.    

    The  latest  housing  price  index  from  the  Canadian  Real  

    Estate  Association  shows  a  15.33-‐per-‐cent  jump  in  the  

    prices  of  all  real  estate  types  in  the  region  between  

    October  2014  and  last  month.  The  average  sale  price  of  a  

    detached  home  in  Vancouver  nearly  doubled  the  

    national  index  price  of  $585,800.    

    Price  gains  were  slightly  more  modest  for  condos,  but  

    greater  Vancouver  still  saw  the  largest  jump  in  prices  in  

    the  country  at  11.39  per  cent.  A  typical  apartment  sold  

    for  $425,800  last  month.    

    http://goo.gl/igLBkC    

     

     

     

  •   15  

    Transit  &  transportation  news  

    Illness-‐causing  community  shuttle  buses  to  be  

    replaced  using  Metro’s  federal  gas  tax  funds  

    Metro  Vancouver  directors  have  approved  a  request  by  

    TransLink  to  reallocate  $9.35  million  from  the  federal  gas  tax  

    fund  to  replace  62  defective  diesel  community  shuttle  buses  

    that  drivers  complained  were  making  them  ill.    

    The  money  is  coming  from  $3.05  million  in  surplus  after  the  

    purchase  of  100  HandyDart  vehicles.  Another  $6.3  million  was  

    meant  for  the  purchase  of  24  new  diesel-‐powered  community  

    shuttles  in  2015.  The  new  buses  are  expected  to  arrive  in  

    about  6  months.  

    Complaints  with  the  diesel  coaches  that  are  being  replaced  

    first  arose  shortly  after  the  buses  were  put  into  service  in  2013,  

    with  more  than  100  documented  cases  of  transit  staff  getting  

    sick.  

    According  to  media  reports,  shuttle  manufacturer  Navistar  is  

    facing  class-‐action  lawsuits  over  defects  regarding  reliability,  as  

    well  as  coolant  and  exhaust  fumes  entering  the  passenger  

    compartment  in  some  of  it’s  pre-‐2013  model  diesel  trucks.  

    While  happy  the  shuttles  will  be  off  the  road,  the  president  of  

    Unifor  Local  111  says  TransLink  is  “robbing  Peter  to  pay  Paul”  

    by  taking  funding  meant  for  the  HandyDART  program.    

    Decision  shows  Metro’s  willingness  to  leverage  financial  

    influence  on  TransLink  

    Metro’s  involvement  in  this  issue  is  indicative  of  the  regional  

    district’s  new  ability  and  willingness  to  exercise  control  

    over  federal  gas  tax  money  transferred  to  TransLink.  

    In  the  past,  TransLink  did  not  have  to  tell  Metro  

    Vancouver  how  it  was  spending  gas  tax  money,  but  that  

    changed  with  a  new  agreement  last  year  that  requires  

    Metro  to  sign  off  on  capital  projects,  even  those  

    previously  approved.    

    Recent  discussions  at  Metro  committee  and  board  

    meetings  suggest  Metro  will  not  simply  be  ‘rubber  

    stamping’  requests  from  TransLink  for  gas  tax  funds,  but  

    instead  will  expect  more  cooperation  and  transparency  

    around  capital  spending.  In  the  wake  of  the  defeat  of  the  

    transit  referendum,  Directors  have  instructed  staff  to  

    investigate  Metro  retaining  ownership  of  TransLink  assets  

    purchased  with  federal  gas  tax  money,  which  would  give  

    Metro  greater  influence  over  TransLink’s  planning,  

    disposition  of  assets,  and  even  future  borrowing  capacity.  

    In  approving  the  reallocation  of  funds  for  new  community  

    shuttles,  Metro  Vice-‐Chair  Raymond  Louie  said  the  Board  

    wanted  to  “make  it  very  clear  to  TransLink  this  is  a  

    one-‐time  amendment,  and  we  expect  cooperation  with  

    how  they  go  about  doing  capital  planning.”    

    http://goo.gl/l7qoWY  

    http://goo.gl/HE7BI0    

  •   SCI  Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update:  2015-‐8  

    Proposed  solution  can  

    be  win-‐win  for  

    everyone  and  the  

    environment  

    By  Paul  Finch,  Treasurer  of  

    the  B.C.  Government  &  

    Service  Employees’  Union.  

    The  overwhelming  No  vote  in  the  spring  Lower  Mainland  

    transit  plebiscite  has  generated  frustration  about  how  to  

    move  forward  with  improvements  to  transit  infrastructure.  

    The  No  side  ran  a  populist  campaign  against  TransLink’s  

    management  and  interpret  the  results  as  a  denunciation  of  

    any  tax  increase  to  fund  transit.  The  Yes  campaign’s  rush  to  

    champion  a  regressive  tax  and  overlook  TransLink’s  

    mismanagement  cost  them  much  needed  credibility  for  what  

    should  be  a  popular  endeavour.  

    Yet  between  these  two  positions,  most  people  agree  we  need  

    more  rapid  transit  infrastructure:  to  reduce  congestion,  make  

    commutes  easier,  ensure  environmental  sustainability,  and  to  

    navigate  the  skyrocketing  property  values  that  drive  people  

    farther  from  the  downtown  core.  Instead  of  assuming  that  

    voters  made  the  wrong  choice,  we  should  take  it  as  a  sincere  

    vote  against  TransLink’s  mismanagement  and  a  regressive  tax  

    shift.  

    There  is  a  better  solution,  one  that  TransLink  staff  have  

    already  proposed  as  an  alternative:  Land  Value  Capture,  also  

    known  as  an  Area  Benefiting  Tax.  To  translate  in  plain  terms:  

    pay  for  transit  improvements  by  taxing  some  of  the  property  

    appreciation  that  those  improvements  produce.  Public  

    infrastructure  causes  windfall  gains  for  nearby  property  

    owners  and  developers.  We  could  finance  construction  

    through  government  bonds,  then  repay  those  bonds  over  

    time  with  an  incrementally  higher  property  tax  on  nearby  

    developable  sites.  

    Of  course,  this  means  real  estate  speculators  won’t  make  as  

    much  if  they  have  to  contribute,  but  if  nothing  is  built  they  

    wouldn’t  make  anything  anyway.  For  the  vast  majority  of  

    Lower  Mainlanders,  it’s  a  fair  solution:  those  who  directly  

    profit  from  a  project  can  still  make  a  reasonable  profit  

    and  the  tax  burden  isn’t  shifted  to  a  regressive  sales  tax.  

    It  can  be  a  win-‐win  for  everyone  and  the  environment.  

    One  wonders  why  this  wasn’t  the  solution  proposed  in  

    the  first  place:  an  Area  Benefitting  Tax  was  among  the  

    options  presented  to  TransLink  and  it  has  many  benefits.  

    Such  a  scheme  has  no  “dead  weight  loss”  —  that  is,  

    unlike  income  and  sales  taxes,  it  doesn’t  stifle  the  

    economy  and  taxes  speculation  rather  than  productive  

    activity.  Because  of  the  unique  nature  of  land  economics  

    and  contrary  to  what  some  might  think,  it  wouldn’t  

    negatively  impact  housing  affordability  either.  And  

    finally,  consumers  are  spared  from  being  overcharged  

    for  purchasing  everyday  items,  and  businesses  aren’t  

    subjected  to  another  downward  pressure  on  their  sales.  

    We  can  look  to  an  example  of  an  applied  model  of  Land  

    Value  Capture  used  by  the  MTR  Corporation  in  the  Hong  

    Kong  light  rail  system  and  abroad,  which  is  funded  

    without  direct  subsidy.  Economic  studies  have  been  

    conducted  that  show  an  area  benefiting  tax  applied  to  

    such  transit  expansions  as  the  London  Tube  in  London  or  

    Washington  D.C.  metro  in  North  America  would  yield  

    positive  values  from  the  profit  of  land  speculation,  which  

    raise  the  possibility  of  modest  surpluses  on  capital  costs  

    that  could  be  reinvested  for  operating  improvements,  

    ensuring  infrastructure  spending  does  not  undercut  the  

    valuable  role  of  personnel  and  training  in  expanding  

    services.  This  transit  plebiscite  was  non-‐binding,  and  has  

    squarely  thrown  the  question  of  increased  funding  for  

    Lower  Mainland  transit  infrastructure  back  on  the  

    province.  

    The  premier  should  do  the  right  thing:  address  concerns  

    over  TransLink  management  by  changing  the  governance  

    model  to  increase  the  role  of  elected  municipal  

    politicians,  commit  to  immediate  public  funding  for  

    much  needed  transit  improvements,  and  recover  the  

    capital  costs  associated  with  the  project  with  a  Land  

    Value  Capture  /  Area  Benefiting  Tax  that  is  fair  for  all  

    residents.    

     

    Op-‐ed  

    Fund  transit  by  taxing  land  speculators  

  •   17  

    Fassbender  indicates  road  pricing  a  possibility  for  TransLink,  

    without  referendum    

    Communities  Minister  Peter  Fassbender  said  in  mid-‐November  

    that  the  B.C.  government  is  willing  to  consider  charging  drivers  

    for  when  and  how  far  they  travel  to  raise  money  for  public  

    transit.  Fassbender  cautioned  such  a  system  would  be  too  

    complex  to  put  in  place  before  an  expected  round  of  federal  

    infrastructure  spending.    

    Fassbender  didn’t  suggest  mobility  pricing  would  have  to  be  

    approved  through  a  referendum,  as  Premier  Christy  Clark  did  

    in  October.  However,  Fassbender  reiterated  that  he’s  not  

    going  to  consider  any  reorganization  of  how  TransLink  is  

    governed.    

    Fassbender  was  responding  to  a  new  congestion  pricing  report  

    from  Canada's  Ecofiscal  Commission  that  urges  harmonized  

    bridge  tolls  in  Metro  as  a  pilot  project  ahead  of  a  potential  

    longer-‐range  effort  to  bring  in  per-‐kilometre  road  use  fees.  

    The  report  said  congestion  already  costs  the  region  at  least  

    $1.4  billion  a  year  and  is  only  expected  to  get  worse  as  the  

    population  grows.  The  Ecofiscal  Commission  advisory  board  

    includes  business  and  environmental  group  leaders,  as  well  

    politicians  such  as  former  prime  minister  Paul  Martin,  former  

    B.C.  premier  Michael  Harcourt,  former  Reform  Party  leader  

    Preston  Manning  and  former  federal  Liberal  leader  Bob  Rae.    

    Reception  to  the  idea  from  Metro  leaders  has  been  mixed.  For  

    example,  Vancouver  Mayor  Gregor  Robertson  and  others  have  

    made  favorable  comments  about  congestion  pricing,  while  

    District  of  North  Vancouver  Mayor  Richard  Walton  told  CBC  

    News  that  tolling  bridges  and  tunnels  “discriminates  

    significantly  against  certain  parts  of  the  region”  and  “isn't  

    going  to  fly  particularly  well  with  his  constituents.”  

    http://goo.gl/m2ECPt  

    http://goo.gl/Nfp1S7  

    http://goo.gl/Z5kr13  

    http://goo.gl/2RkVGa  

    http://goo.gl/PWIPmN  

    http://goo.gl/GUAq0u  

    http://goo.gl/rjmppI  

    https://goo.gl/7jzlm8  

     

    New  TransLink  directors  appointed  

    TransLink  has  two  new  directors  on  its  board.  

    Larry  Beasley,  a  former  director  of  planning  for  the  City  of  

    Vancouver,  and  Tony  Gugliotta,  Vancouver  Airport  

    Authority's  vice-‐president  of  business  development,  have  

    been  appointed  to  three-‐year  terms.  

    They  were  chosen  by  the  mayors'  council,  which  appoints  

    new  directors  from  a  short  list  of  candidates  vetted  by  a  

    screening  panel.  

    Lorraine  Cunningham,  chair  of  the  Pacific  Pilotage  Authority,  

    was  reappointed  to  another  term.  

    Transit  &  transportation  news  in  brief  

  •   SCI  Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update:  2015-‐8  

    Beasley  and  Gugliotta  replace  outgoing  directors  John  Dawson  

    and  Robin  Chakrabarti.  

    http://www.surreyleader.com/news/358896251.html    

     

    Mayor  Robertson  discusses  transit  funding  with  Prime  

    Minister  

    Vancouver  Mayor  Gregor  Robertson  discussed  transit  funding  

    with  Prime  Minister  Trudeau  during  a  meeting  at  COP  21  in  

    Paris.  Robertson  met  Trudeau,  Environment  &  Climate  Change  

    Minister  Catherine  McKenna  and  Montreal  Mayor  Denis  

    Coderre  to  talk  about  how  the  federal  government  can  partner  

    with  big  cities  to  take  action  on  climate  change.  

    Robertson  advocated  for  transit  improvements  generally  and  

    the  Broadway  subway  specifically,  he  told  the  Metro  

    newspaper.  

    “We  talked  about  the  best  next  investments  in  transit  and  

    transportation  to  reduce  climate  pollution  and  help  relieve  

    congestion  as  well,”  Robertson  said,  adding  he  is  “relentlessly”  

    pushing  for  the  mayors’  10-‐year  plan  that  includes  Surrey  light  

    rail  and  major  bus  investments.  

    While  Trudeau  didn’t  make  a  firm  commitment  to  a  specific  

    timeline,  Robertson  said  he  hopes  it  can  be  done  in  a  year  or  

    two  after  details  are  hammered  out  with  the  feds  and  the  

    province.  

    http://goo.gl/wEm1bX  

     

    Poll  shows  major  public  disapproval  for  provincial  

    government  handling  of  TransLink  

    The  year-‐end  Insights  West  “BC  Government  Report  Card”  poll  

    of  BC  residents  shows  major  public  disapproval  of  how  the  

    province  has  managed  TransLink.  Only  10%  of  BC  residents  

    said  they  were  satisfied  with  how  the  province  has  dealt  with  

    TransLink  and  83%  in  Metro  Vancouver  had  a  negative  view  of  

    the  government’s  actions  on  this  file.  

    http://goo.gl/CfaZbg  

     

    TransLink’s  credit  rating  stable,  but  debt  levels  comparatively  

    high  

    Moody’s  Investors  Service  is  giving  TransLink  a  stable  rating  of  

    Aa2  in  its  latest  credit  opinion  released  this  month.    

    According  to  the  rating  provider,  one  of  the  challenges  

    TransLink  faces  is  that  its  debt  levels  are  among  the  

    highest  compared  to  other  rated  transit  agencies  

    around  the  world.  The  debt  is  259%  of  revenue  net  of  

    capital  contributions,  and  could  impact  ratings  

    negatively  if  this  exceeds  300%.    

    “TransLink  has  one  of  the  highest  debt  and  interest  

    burdens  among  similar  rated  global  peers,  but  benefits  

    from  more  diverse  revenue  sources  ...  (its)  wider  

    responsibilities  and  status  as  a  taxing  authority  allow  it  

    to  sustain  a  higher  debt  burden  than  other  public  mass  

    transit  enterprises  at  the  same  rating  level,”  reads  the  

    report,  dated  Oct.  23,  by  the  analysts.    

    Credit  challenges  listed  in  the  Moody’s  report  included:  

    • “Limited  prospects  for  deleveraging  due  to  high  

    expansionary  capital  requirements  “  

    • “Constructive  working  relationship  with  Mayor's  

    Council  and  provincial  government  is  critical  for  

    gaining  support  and  funding  for  future  capital  

    projects.”  

     TransLink’s  net  debt  in  the  2014  calendar  year  was  

    $3.58  billion  —  its  interest  payments  make  up  12.4%  of  

    revenues.    

    http://goo.gl/TcIz76  

    http://goo.gl/E1fCP1  

     

    Auto-‐restart  for  stalled  SkyTrains  still  5  years  away  

     TransLink  is  now  targeting  2020  for  completion  of  

    auto-‐restart  capability  for  stalled  skytrains.  Feasibility  

    studies  are  to  be  complete  by  next  summer,  followed  

    by  a  business  case  and  then  a  request  for  proposals.    

    An  independent  review  in  2014  estimated  an  auto  

    restart  system  would  cost  about  $5  million,  and  noted  

    an  auto-‐restart  module  was  available  when  the  

    SkyTrain  control  software  was  upgraded  in  1994,  but  

    the  version  that  was  installed  then  did  not  include  it.    

    http://www.abbynews.com/news/337172301.html    

     

    Challenges  brewing  to  Vancouver  and  Surrey  

    leadership  of  Mayors'  Council  on  Regional  

    Transportation?  

    Media  reports  in  October  speculated  about  the  

  •   19  

    possibility  to  challenges  to  Vancouver  and  Surrey  leadership  of  

    the  Mayors’  Council  on  Regional  Transportation.  Delta  Mayor  

    Lois  Jackson  is  reported  to  have  said  that  she  “doesn't  rule  out  

    letting  her  name  stand  again  and  predicts  other  challengers  

    may  surface.”    

    Vancouver's  Gregor  Robertson  and  Surrey's  Linda  Hepner  are  

    the  current  chair  and  vice-‐chair  of  the  Mayors'  Council  on  

    Regional  Transportation,  and  as  a  result  they  also  sit  as  

    directors  on  the  TransLink  board.    

    Metro  mayors  will  vote  by  early  January  on  who  should  hold  

    those  seats  next  year.    

    http://goo.gl/NFaPAx  

       

    Taxi  drivers  picking  up  HandyDART  riders  need  more  training,  

    say  disability  advocates    

    Disability  advocates  are  calling  for  disability  sensitivity  training  

    to  be  a  requirement  for  taxi  drivers  who  pick  up  HandyDART  

    passengers.    

    "There  have  been  way  too  many  experiences  where  people  

    who  have  mobility  aids  have  been  injured  themselves  or  have  

    had  their  equipment  injured,"  said  Heather  McCain,  executive  

    director  of  the  advocacy  group  Citizens  for  Accessible  

    Neighbourhoods.    

    TransLink  started  deferring  some  HandyDART  requests  to  taxis  

    in  2013,  a  move  that  prompted  harsh  criticism  from  users  and  

    drivers.  Riders  are  required  to  either  produce  a  bus  pass,  a  bus  

    ticket,  or  pay  the  equivalent  to  the  taxi  driver.    

    HandyDART  drivers  receive  two  weeks  of  training,  including  

    hands-‐on  and  disability  sensitivity  training.  The  Vancouver  Taxi  

    Association  provides  a  video  and  training  booklet  on  the  topic  

    and  the  BC  Taxi  Association  is  working  with  the  Justice  

    Institute  to  bring  a  higher  level  of  training  to  their  drivers.    

    But  disability  advocates  say  those  measures  are  not  enough.  

    McCain  says  even  taxi  drivers  who  mean  well  can  do  damage.    

    http://goo.gl/6QhnjR  

     

    New  generation  SkyTrain  cars  begin  arriving  in  Vancouver    

    The  first  cars  from  TransLink’s  $90.7-‐million  order  of  

    Bombardier  Innovia  Metro  300  trains  for  the  SkyTrain  system  

    began  arriving  in  October  at  the  Edmonds  Operations  and  

    Maintenance  Centre  in  Burnaby.    

    A  total  of  seven  trains,  totaling  28  cars,  were  ordered  

    in  2012  to  expand  the  fleet’s  capacity  ahead  of  the  

    opening  of  the  Evergreen  extension  of  the  Millennium  

    Line.    

    http://goo.gl/gEKt2c  

     

    Proposed  bus  route  changes  raise  concerns  for  

    municipal  leaders,  unions  and  transit  users  

    TransLink’s  proposals  for  at  least  85  bus  route  changes  

    met  with  significant  concern  from  transit  users,  local  

    leaders  and  transit  unions  during  a  period  of  public  

    consultation  in  October  and  November.  

    • New  Westminster  local  elected  leaders  raised  

    concerns  about  route  changes  in  that  

    municipality,  as  well  as  potential  impacts  of  

    reduced  night  buses  from  Vancouver.  

    • West  Vancouver’s  mayor  expressed  opposition  to  

    plans  to  cut  an  express  bus  from  that  municipality  

    to  UBC,  

    • White  Rock’s  council  was  also  concerned  about  

    route  changes,  and  was  critical  of  TransLink’s  

    consultation  process.  

    • UBC’s  student  society  voted  in  favour  of  a  motion  

    objecting  to  cancelling  the  258  bus  route  to  UBC.    

    • Burnaby’s  Heights  Merchants  Association  came  

    out  against  some  of  the  proposed  changes  and  

    called  on  TransLink  to  do  more  consultation  with  

    the  public.  

    • Unifor  111  President  Nathan  Woods  says  many  of  

    the  proposed  changes  are  cuts  that  will  directly  

    impact  bus  riders,  put  more  cars  on  the  road  and  

    create  more  congestion  on  the  Lower  Mainland’s  

    already  congested  streets.  

    TransLink  told  media  it  will  try  to  minimize  the  service  

    cut  “in  areas  where  there  are  no  other  transit  

    alternatives.”  Hours  re-‐allocated  tend  to  focus  on  

    increased  revenues  through  ridership  increases,  and  

    bring  more  resources  where  overcrowding  becomes  

    an  issue.    

    TransLink’s  program  of  ‘service  optimization’  began  in  

    2010,  with  the  rationale  of  redirecting  transit  to  

    growing  areas  without  new  resources.  Over  the  course  

  •   SCI  Metro  Vancouver  &  TransLink  Update:  2015-‐8  

    of  four  years,  about  390,000  service  hours  have  been  

    reallocated  in  the  region.    

    http://goo.gl/SBQxWf  

    http://goo.gl/zkEQsQ  

    http://goo.gl/ppyrzS  

    http://goo.gl/vZS23D  

    http://goo.gl/RgpYNL  

    http://goo.gl/0PcKiI  

     

    City  of  North  Vancouver  calls  for  1-‐zone  fare  on  SeaBus    

    The  City  of  North  Vancouver  is  calling  on  TransLink  to  

    introduce  a  temporary  one-‐zone  fare  on  the  SeaBus.    

    In  October,  TransLink  moved  to  a  one-‐zone  fare  for  all  bus-‐

    only  travel.  However,  that  change  does  not  include  the  

    SeaBus.  

    “The  TransLink  board  needs  to  look  at  this  because  it  will  

    become  unfair.  If  they’re  going  to  the  same  location,  one  is  

    twice  as  much  as  the  other,  then  you  know  what,  it’s  not  

    quite  fair,”  said  Darrell  Mussatto,  the  mayor  of  the  City  of  

    North  Vancouver.    

    Mussatto  said  cost  isn’t  the  only  reason  they’re  calling  for  

    change.    

    “We’re  a  little  bit  worried  here  in  the  city  that  people  will  

    start  to  take  more  buses  and  in  consequence  more  buses  

    means  more  diesel  fuel  on  the  road  so  we  really  want  to  

    make  sure  that  it’s  fair  both  ways,”  he  said.    

    http://goo.gl/3lhxLt  

     

    Evergreen  Line  launch  delayed  to  2017  

    The  launch  of  the  Evergreen  Line  has  been  delayed  again,  

    and  the  first  trains  are  now  expected  to  start  running  in  

    early  2017.  

    The  rapid  transit  line  was  originally  scheduled  to  open  in  

    the  summer  of  2016,  but  that  was  pushed  back  to  the  fall  

    earlier  this  year.  

    Tunnel  boring  has  now  been  completed  for  the  project  and  

    tunnel  interior  work  and  systems  installations  will  continue  

    into  next  summer.  Train  testing  will  begin  in  the  tunnel  by  

    fall  2016  if  everything  continues  as  planned.  

    Station  buildings  are  between  80  and  90-‐per-‐cent  complete  

    on  the  $1.43-‐billion  SkyTrain  line.  

    http://goo.gl/BSYiFv  

     

    Critics  say  SkyTrain  technology  is  past  its  prime  

    A  media  report  from  Global  News  quotes  UBC  School  of  

    Architecture  and  Landscape  Architecture  professor  Patrick  

    Condon  raising  concerns  that  SkyTrain  technology  could  be  

    out  of  date.  

    “It  seemed  like  a  great  idea  in  1985,  but  you  have  to  

    remember  The  Jetsons  was  on  television  in  1985  as  well,”  

    said  Patrick  Condon  of  UBC’s  School  of  Architecture  and  

    Landscape  Architecture.  “This  idea  of  a  driverless,  elevated,  

    quasi-‐monorail  was  very  popular  then.”  

    “At  some  point  you  really  need  to  think  in  2015  terms  and  

    not  automatically  think,  we  have  to  extend  this  1985  system  

    because,  hey,  we  bought  it,  we  might  as  well  keep  pushing  it  

    out,”  Condon  said.  

    http://goo.gl/kBPKpl  

     

    Province  accused  of  hiding  Massey  Bridge  documents    

    The  provincial  government  came  under  fire  in  November  for  

    blocking  the  release  of  information  related  to  its  plan  to  

    build  a  new  bridge  on  Highway  99  to  replace  the  Massey  

    Tunnel.    

    Independent  MLA  Vicki  Huntington  raised  the  issue  in  the  

    legislature,  saying  three  se