Upload
metro-los-angeles
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
1/29
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
2/29
1
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Key Findings
Support for both measures is initially strong and the
intensity of support – those saying definitely yes – increasesfor both measures after education.
Self-reported likely November 2016 voters are lesssupportive of the measures and many of their individual
features than all County residents . However, supportamong self-reported likely November 2016 voters appearsrelatively strong.
The Augmentation/Extension Measure is susceptible to
a simple explanation of what the measure actually does ,after which support drops to below two-thirds.
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
3/29
2
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Key Findings Continued
To be successful, a measure must include funds for a
package of local roads, freeways and publictransportation improvements .
Specifically: freeway improvements; traffic congestionrelief; keeping fares low for seniors, the disabled and
students; earthquake retrofitting bridges and tunnels;and pothole repairs and local street paving top the listof many important features .
Selecting voter-preferred individual regional projects
can make a difference in passing the measure .
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
4/29
3
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Key Findings Continued
Concern about the growing population of drivers and the
desire for traffic congestion relief are top reasons whyall residents and self-reported definite voters would be moreinclined to vote yes on a measure.
Metro continues to have more favorable ratings among
all residents and self-reported likely November 2016 votersthan the Los Angeles County MetropolitanTransportation Authority .
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
5/29
4
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Methodology
Conducted a Random Digit Dial Survey by telephone
(landlines and cell phones) between March 17th
–
March29 th , 2015Interviews with 1,414 Los Angeles County residents ages 18years or olderSurvey was available in English and SpanishSome percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding
Margin of error for the full sample is +/- 2.6% and half the
sample is+/-3.3%Margin of error for each Metro Planning Area is +/-6.9% andhalf sample is +/-9.8%
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
6/29
5
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Methodology Continued
Margin of error for self-reported registered voterslikely to vote in the November 2016 General Election(n=863) is +/-3.4% and half sample is +/-4.8%
Note: This sample of self-reported registered likelyNov 2016 voters is different from a typical voterpopulation, which is based on actual registrationinformation and voter history.
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
7/296
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
METRO Planning AreasPlanning Area Largest Cities in the Area SampleSize
Actual %of County
Westside City of Los Angeles, Santa Monica,West Hollywood, Culver City and Beverly Hills 200 13%
South BayCity of Los Angeles, Torrance, Carson,
Inglewood, Redondo Beach andunincorporated sections of Los Angeles County
201 14%
Central City of Los Angeles 204 10%
San Gabriel Valley Pasadena, Pomona, West Covina, Alhambra, Arcadia, Diamond Bar, El Monte, Glendora andunincorporated sections of Los Angeles County
201 19%
San Fernando ValleyBurbank, Calabasas, Glendale,
La Canada/Flintridge, City of Los Angeles,San Fernando, Unincorporated
202 18%
North County Lancaster, City of Los Angeles,Palmdale, Santa Clarita, Unincorporated 205 7%
Southeast
Long Beach, Downey, Lakewood,Norwalk, Compton, Cerritos, Bellflower,Pico Rivera, South Gate, Whittier and
unincorporated sections of Los Angeles County
201 19%
Total 1414 100%
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
8/297
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
9/298
Shall voters authorize continuing to advance and improvethe Los Angeles County transportation system, provide trafficcongestion relief, and economic and job growth by: extending
light rail, subway, neighborhood shuttles and bus systems inLos Angeles County; improving connections to jobs, schoolsand local airports; improving freeway and local street trafficflow and safety; repairing potholes; synchronizing local
signals; and keeping seniors, disabled and student fares low;approval augments by one-half cent and extends the existingCounty sales tax, with independent financial audits, andcitizen oversight; all funds controlled locally?
Ballot Summary for the ½-cent Sales Tax
Augmentation/Extension Measure
Q7. If the election were held t oday on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
10/299
In 2008, Los Angeles County voters approved aone-half cent traffic relief sales tax for 30 years.The measure I just described would make thatsales tax permanent and increase the countytransportation sales tax by one-half cent.
Brief Explanation of the
Augmentation/Extension Measure
Q8. If the election were held t oday on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
11/2910
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
46%
36%
49%
20%
22%
25% 5%
7%
10%
6%
15%
19%
9%
5%
6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Initial Vote
Vote After Explanation
Final Vote After Information
Def. Yes Prob. Yes Und./ Lean Yes Und./Lean No Prob. No Def. No Und.
Seventy percent of self-reported likely voters initiallysay they would vote yes on the augmentation/extensionmeasure. While support drops to below the two-thirds
threshold after receiving a brief explanation of the measure,support exceeds initial vote after more education.
Q7/Q8/Q15 (Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no tooppose it? Split Sample
Total Yes
TotalNo
70% 25%
63% 31%
79% 18%
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
12/2911
Shall voters authorize continuing to advance and improve theLos Angeles County transportation system, provide trafficcongestion relief, and economic and job growth by: extending
light rail, subway, neighborhood shuttles and bus systems inLos Angeles County; improving connections to jobs, schoolsand local airports; improving freeway and local street trafficflow and safety; repairing potholes; synchronizing local
signals; and keeping seniors, disabled and student fares low;approval increases the County sales tax by one-half cent, withindependent financial audits and citizen oversight; all fundscontrolled locally?
Ballot Summary for the ½-cent Sales Tax
Increase Measure
Q9. If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
13/2912
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
42%
48%
26%
23%
5% 7%
5%
13%
17%
7%
5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Initial Vote
Final Vote After Information
Def. Yes Prob. Yes Und./ Lean Yes Und./Lean No Prob. No Def. No Und.
Seventy-two percent of self-reported likely November2016 voters initially support the ½-cent sales tax increase
measure, and overall support remains stable after
education, with “definitely yes” voters increasing by 6%.
Q9/Q16 (Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no tooppose it? Split Sample
Total Yes
TotalNo
72% 21%
73% 23%
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
14/2913
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
32%
30%
25%
10%
1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
(B) Local street and roadimprovements
(C) Freeway and highwayimprovements
(A) Local and regional lightrail and bus transportation
improvements
Both A and B, A and C,B and C/All
None of them/Other/DK/NA
35%
27%
24%
12%
3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
All three major areas of transportation investmentare considered the top priority by between roughly
one-quarter to one-third of respondents, respectively.
Q10 (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). I am going to read you three uses of existing transportation funding in LA County. Please tellme which one is your top priority for transportation funding.
Self-Reported LikelyNovember 2016 VotersAll Residents
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
15/2914
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Potential Transportation Featuresby Metro Planning Area
(Ranked by All Residents % Very Important to be included in the measure - 6 or 7 rating)
Q12 (All Residents/Planning Area). I want to return to the transportation sales tax measure we were discussing earlier. I am going to mention somefeatures of the proposed Los Angeles County Measure. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, after I mention each one, please tell me howimportant it is to you that the feature be included as part of the measure. We will use a scale of one to seven, where one means NOT AT ALLIMPORTANT to you that the feature or provision is included in the measure and seven means it would be VERY IMPORTANT. ^Not part of Split Sample
Features AllResidents Westside SouthBay Central SGV SFV NorthCounty Southeast
Earthquake retrofitting bridges,tunnels and overpasses 81% 81% 81% 77% 83% 83% 75% 83%
Improving freeway traffic flow on the 5,10, 14, 60, 101, 110, 138, 210, 405,
605 and the 710 freeways80% 78% 78% 78% 83% 83% 70% 79%
Keeping seniors, disabledand student fares low 79% 70% 79% 78% 84% 80% 84% 81%
Preventing polluted toxic roadway runofffrom entering storm drains and flowinginto creeks, rivers and coastal waters
and onto County beaches
79% 83% 82% 84% 77% 72% 80% 83%
Repairing potholes andrepaving local streets 79% 78% 76% 86% 77% 76% 81% 83%
Improving freeway traffic flow 78% 80% 77% 80% 73% 75% 85% 82%
Continuing to advance and improve theLos Angeles County transportation
system to provide traffic congestion relief75% 77% 69% 81% 79% 66% 86% 76%
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
16/2915
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Continued
Q12 (All Residents/Planning Area). I want to return to the transportation sales tax measure we were discussing earlier. I am going to mention somefeatures of the proposed Los Angeles County Measure. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, after I mention each one, please tell me howimportant it is to you that the feature be included as part of the measure. We will use a scale of one to seven, where one means NOT AT ALLIMPORTANT to you that the feature or provision is included in the measure and seven means it would be VERY IMPORTANT. ^Not part of Split Sample
Features AllResidents WestsideSouth
Bay Central SGV SFVNorth
County Southeast
Widening freeways to improve traffic flow 75% 62% 71% 83% 82% 75% 82% 73%
Improving connections to jobs,schools and local airports 72% 77% 72% 77% 71% 61% 63% 80%
Improving safety on buses and light raillines, and at bus stops and rail stations 70% 73% 80% 79% 73% 49% 71% 72%
Improving van service for seniors,the disabled and veterans 70% 57% 64% 75% 73% 68% 75% 79%
Improving freeway safety 70% 53% 82% 73% 68% 63% 71% 79%
Adding and upgrading crosswalksand sidewalks to improve
student and pedestrian safety70% 64% 64% 78% 69% 68% 73% 74%
Synchronizing signals inevery area of the County 68% 63% 68% 65% 65% 68% 63% 79%
Reducing diesel emissions fromtrucks and trains 67% 60% 66% 80% 72% 53% 61% 78%
Continuing to advance and improve theLos Angeles County transportation system
to help economic and job growth66% 63% 61% 73% 68% 61% 67% 73%
(Ranked by All Residents % Very Important to be included in the measure 6 or 7 rating)
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
17/2916
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
Continued
Q12 (All Residents/Planning Area). I want to return to the transportation sales tax measure we were discussing earlier. I am going to mention somefeatures of the proposed Los Angeles County Measure. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, after I mention each one, please tell me howimportant it is to you that the feature be included as part of the measure. We will use a scale of one to seven, where one means NOT AT ALLIMPORTANT to you that the feature or provision is included in the measure and seven means it would be VERY IMPORTANT. ^Not part of Split Sample
Features AllResidents WestsideSouth
Bay Central SGV SFVNorth
County Southeast
Improving safety at rail crossings 65% 58% 59% 78% 65% 58% 76% 71%
Improving the flow and safety of trucktraffic on freeways and roads near thePorts of Los Angeles and Long Beach
64% 59% 58% 66% 63% 65% 71% 71%
Connecting public transit toLAX, Burbank, Long Beach
and Palmdale airports64% 61% 57% 80% 55% 70% 73% 65%
Upgrading freeway on- andoff-ramps to improve traffic flow 64% 66% 49% 78% 60% 56% 72% 73%
Synchronizing local signals 64% 60% 69% 71% 58% 64% 56% 71%
Upgrading and redesigning local streetsto balance motorist concerns with better
and safer access for pedestrians,bicycles and bus travel
63% 64% 60% 72% 63% 56% 64% 68%
Extending light rail, subway and busservice in Los Angeles County 63% 59% 63% 71% 68% 51% 55% 69%
^Extending the light rail systemto more places in the County 62% 59% 61% 65% 68% 51% 66% 65%
Improving and expandingMetrolink service 61% 54% 58% 73% 65% 48% 66% 67%
(Ranked by All Residents % Very Important to be included in the measure 6 or 7 rating)
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
18/29
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
19/2918
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
44%
42%
47%
44%
29%
29%
27%
35%
5%
5%
18%
21%
18%
13%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
All Residents
Self-Reported Likely
Nov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotal
MoreLkly.
Total
LessLkly.
74% 5%
71% 6%
73% 7%
79% 7%
West Los Angeles residents and self-reported likely November 2016voters are more likely to vote for the measure if the Crenshaw LAX Light
Rail Line is extended and traffic flow on the 10 freeway is improved.
Q13 a-e (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last li st I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now liketo read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will befunded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 1 – West Los Angeles County)
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Extending the MetroCrenshaw LAX Rail Line,
which is currently underconstruction, to the Metro
Purple Line on Wilshire andthrough West Hollywood to the
Metro Red Line in Hollywood
Improving the traffic flow alongthe 10 freeway between the
405 freeway and downtown Lby widening the road at key
bottlenecks and upgrading theon- and off-ramps
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
20/2919
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
38%
37%
35%
35%
24%
16%
26%
19%
27%
25%
28%
38%
8%
13%
6%
11%
7%
11%
15%
26%
27%
30%
27%
21%
21%
5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NA
TotalMoreLkly.
TotalLessLkly.
64% 8%
56% 16%
62% 5%
60% 10%
52% 22%
54% 22%
West Los Angeles Continued
Q13 a-e (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last li st I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would nowlike to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service willbe funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 1 – West Los AngelesCounty)
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Connecting LAX to theSan Fernando Valley by a subway
line under the Sepulveda Pass
Extending the Metro Purple LineSubway, currently under
construction, beyond UCLA andWestwood toward Santa Monica
Connecting LAX to the SanFernando Valley by a subway line
under the Sepulveda Pass. Thiswould be funded partially by a
new toll Express Lane travellingalong the 405 from LAX to the
Valley in both directions
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
21/29
20
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
54%
53%
51%
47%
55%
56%
44%
42%
25%
24%
27%
28%
20%
17%
25%
20%
5%
6%
7%
6%
5%
6%
7%
14%
12%
16%
15%
13%
13%
14%
23%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported Likely
Nov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotalMoreLkly.
TotalLessLkly.
78% 5%
77% 8%
78% 4%75% 6%
75% 8%
73% 10%
69% 12%
62% 12%
South Bay residents and self-reported likely November 2016 voters are moreprobable to vote for the measure if it improves traffic flow on major streets inthe area, and local street maintenance and traffic flow along the 405 freeway.
Q13 f-i (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now liketo read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will befunded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 2 – The South Bay)
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Improving street maintenance,such as pothole repair, on
major streets throughout theSouth Bay
Removing key bottlenecks andimproving traffic flow on Pacific
Coast Highway, Hawthorne andCrenshaw Boulevards, and
Western Avenue
Improving traffic along the 405freeway between the 105 andthe 110 freeways by widening
the road at key bottlenecks andupgrading the on- and off-ramps
Extending the Metro GreenLight Rail Line south towardsSan Pedro through Redondo
Beach and Torrance
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
22/29
21
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
55%
39%
58%
44%
54%
44%
48%
34%
24%
28%
18%
23%
17%
17%
20%
22%
6%
6%
7%
8%
5%
5%
8%
11%
17%
15%
20%
17%
22%
16%
22%
6%
8%
6%
6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported Likely
Nov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotalMoreLkly.
TotalLessLkly.
80% 7%
67% 10%
76% 6%66% 6%
71% 9%
62% 10%
69% 12%
56% 16%
Central Los Angeles residents and self-reported likely November 2016voters are more likely to vote for the measure if it extends the Crenshaw
LAX Light Rail Line; improves freeway connections in Downtown; andextends the northbound bus and carpool lane on the 110 freeway.
Q13 j-m (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now liketo read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will befunded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 3 – Central Los Angeles County)
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Extending the Metro CrenshawLAX Light Rail Line, which is
currently under construction, tothe Metro Purple Line on Wilshire
and through West Hollywood tothe Metro Red Line in Hollywood
Improving freeway connectionsaround Downtown Los Angeles
on the 5, 10, 60 and 101 freewaysthrough East LA
Extending the northbound bus andcarpool lane on the 110 freeway
past the current bottleneck at Adams Boulevard into DowntownLA, thereby improving traffic flow,
reducing congestion andimproving safety
Establishing frequent bus servicealong Vermont Avenue that
operates in its own dedicatedlane with fewer stops; connecting
South Los Angeles with theMetro Red Line and Purple Linesubway at Wilshire and Vermont
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
23/29
22
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
52%
48%
49%
41%
48%
42%
49%
43%
19%
18%
21%
21%
19%
23%
17%
14%
5%
8%
8%
7%
11%
5%
9%
17%
19%
20%
16%
22%
16%
20%
17%
6%
7%
7%
5%
6%
7%
8%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotalMoreLkly.
TotalLessLkly.
71% 6%
66% 8%
70% 7%
62% 15%
67% 7%
65% 13%
66% 8%
57% 18%
Within each respective group, there are no statistical differencesin the likelihood of voting with respect to each San Gabriel Valley
project, with one exception - upgrading the 71 Freeway scoreslowest among self-reported likely November 2016 voters.
Q13 n-q (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last l ist I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now liketo read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will befunded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 4 – San Gabriel Valley)
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Extending the Metro Gold LightRail Line further east from East LA
along the 60 freeway towards the605 freeway in South El Monte
Connecting North Hollywood,Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena
by light rail
Extending the Metro Gold LightRail Line which is currently under
construction to Azusa, further eastthrough Glendora and San Dimastoward Claremont
Upgrading the 71 freeway from afour- and six-lane expressway to
an eight-lane freeway betweenMission Boulevard and the
60 freeway in Pomona
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
24/29
23
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
53%
53%
50%
42%
27%
23%
29%
16% 11% 12%
9%
17%
14%
18%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotalMoreLkly.
TotalLessLkly.
80% 7%
76% 6%
79% 7%
59% 23%
San Fernando Valley residents and self-reported likely November2016 voters are more likely to vote for the measure if it improves
traffic flow on the 101 freeway and connects the San Fernando Valleyto LAX by a subway line under the Sepulveda Pass.
Q13 r-v (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would nowlike to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service willbe funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 5 – San Fernando Valley)
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Improving the traffic flow alongthe 101 freeway between the
Ventura County line and theHollywood Freeway in
Universal City by widening theroad at key bottlenecks andupgrading the on- and off-ramps
Connecting the San FernandoValley to LAX by a subway line
under the Sepulveda Pass
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
25/29
24
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
49%
56%
44%
33%
37%
31%
28%
19%
21%
21%
19%
12%
7%
8%
8%
8%
14%
18%
7%
10%
7%
11%
16%
25%
23%
36%
5%
5%
5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotalMoreLkly.
TotalLessLkly.
77% 16%
75% 20%
65% 13%
53% 18%
56% 15%
43% 18%
San Fernando Valley Continued
Q13 r-v (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would nowlike to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that t his project or service willbe funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 5 – San Fernando Valley)
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Connecting theSan Fernando Valley to LAX
by a subway line under theSepulveda Pass. This wouldbe funded partially by a new
toll Express Lane travellingalong the 405 from the Valley
to LAX in both directions
Converting the Metro OrangeLine Busway to a light rail line
connecting Woodland Hills,North Hollywood, the Burbank
Airport, Pasadena and theGreater San Gabriel Valley
Creating a dedicated light railalong Van Nuys Boulevard
connecting Sylmar andVan Nuys Civic Center
through the communities ofPanorama City, Pacoima and
the of San Fernando
Wi hi h i h i i l
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
26/29
25
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
51%
42%
41%
36%
21%
26%
30%
30%
5%
5%
10%
7%
15%
18%
14%
17%
5%
6%
8%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotalMoreLkly.
TotalLessLkly.
72% 8%
68% 7%
71% 11%
67% 8%
Within each respective group, there are no statisticaldifferences in the likelihood of voting with respect to each
North County project, with one exception – improvingstreets near the hospital and medical buildings scores
lowest among self-reported likely November 2016 voters.
Q13 w-z (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would nowlike to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service willbe funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 6 – North County) (N=205)
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Improving the traffic flowalong the I-5 freeway in Santa
Clarita, Newhall and Castaic
by widening the road at keybottlenecks and upgradingthe on- and off-ramps northof the 5 and 14 interchange
Building a new highway, alsoknown as the High Desert
Corridor, between the14 freeway in Palmdale and
15 freeway in Victorville,which would be located northof the 138 through Palmdale,
Littlerock, Sun Village andLake Los Angeles
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
27/29
26
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
44%
36%
47%
41%
27%
19%
20%
25%
7%
6%
5%
16%
28%
18%
20%
10%
7%
8%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotalMoreLkly.
TotalLessLkly.
70% 10%
55% 8%
66% 8%
67% 6%
North County Continued
Q13 w-z (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would nowlike to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service willbe funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 6 – North County) (N=205)
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Improving existing streets andconstructing new streets to
the regional Antelope ValleyHospital and surrounding medicalfacilities in Lancaster to increase
access for emergency vehicles,
patients and visitors
Improving the traffic flow along the14 freeway by widening the road
at key bottlenecks, includingimproving the Avenue S bridge
in Palmdale and upgrading the on-and off-ramps north of the I-5 and
14 interchange in Canyon Country
S th t L A l C t id t d lf t d
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
28/29
27
DRAFT WORK PRODUCT
53%
57%
49%
52%
49%
50%
36%
43%
23%
22%
26%
23%
23%
19%
29%
13%
5%
5%
5%
5%
7%
12%
9%
12%
13%
14%
17%
23%
31%
6%
5%
5%
7%
6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
All Residents
Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters
Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NA
TotalMoreLkly.
TotalLessLkly.
76% 6%
79% 9%
75% 8%
75% 9%
72% 8%
68% 11%
64% 6%
57% 7%
Southeast Los Angeles County residents and self-reportedlikely November 2016 voters are more likely to support the
measure if it adds a carpool and a regular lane on the 5 freeway,improves traffic flow along the 710 freeway and constructs a
light rail line from downtown to the Orange County line.
Q13 aa-dd (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would
now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project orservice will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 7 – SoutheastLos Angeles County) (N=201)
(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)
Adding a carpool and a regularlane on the 5 freeway betweenthe 605 and the 710 freeways
through Commerce and DowneyImproving the traffic flow along the710 freeway by widening the roadat key bottlenecks and upgrading
the on- and off-ramps betweendowntown LA and the Ports ofLos Angeles and Long Beach
through such southeast cities asBell, South Gate and ParamountConstructing a light rail line from
downtown LA to the Orange
County Line through Paramount,Bellflower and Cerritos
Extending the Metro Gold LightRail Line to East Los Angeles
further east toward Whittier alongWashington Boulevard through
Commerce, Pico Rivera, andMontebello
8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation
29/29
12100 Wilsh ire B lvd , Suit e 350Lo s A ng eles , CA 90025Ph o n e (310) 828-1183
Fax (310) 453-6562
Richard [email protected]
For more information, contact:
John [email protected]