Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

  • Upload
    dsparks

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    1/62

    High Dimension Visualization

    in Political Science:How to make beautiful data displays

    David Sparks

    Duke University

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    2/62

    Visualization: Three arbitrary categories

    Infographics: Not what Im talking about Primarily factoids

    Statistical Graphics: Make an argument Distilled representation of the results of analysis

    Information Visualization: Show the data Often high-dimensional, large-N

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    3/62

    Visualization: Three arbitrary categories

    Infographics: Not what Im talking about Primarily factoids

    Statistical Graphics: Make an argument Distilled representation of the results of analysis

    Information Visualization: Show the data Often high-dimensional, large-N

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    4/62

    Factoids, not data

    http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/naps/

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    5/62

    Explanations, not data

    http://www.dnapolicy.org/resources/Cloning_infographic_final.jpg

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    6/62

    Stereotypes, not data

    http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/leftvright_world.html

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    7/62

    Stereotypes, not data

    David McCandless and Stefanie Posavec

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    8/62

    Nothing new (1854)

    http://bibliodyssey.blogspot.com

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    9/62

    PowerPoint as the enemy

    The New York Times

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    10/62

    Framing

    http://docs.house.gov/gopleader/House- Democrats-Health-Plan.pdf

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    11/62

    Visualization: Three arbitrary categories

    Infographics: Not what Im talking about Factoids

    Statistical Graphics: Make an argument Distilled representation of the results of analysis

    Information Visualization: Show the data Often high-dimensional, large-N

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    12/62

    Statistical Graphics

    Gelman: Make use of familiar forms

    Discovery of the unexpected

    Graphics as alternative to tables and models

    Distilled, reduced, minimized Make an argument

    Dont mislead

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    13/62

    Very unnecessary graph, use a table

    http://www.neuroscience.com/graphic.html

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    14/62

    One number, in text

    USDoL via http://www.perceptualedge.com/blog/?p=266

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    15/62

    Why toroidal?

    http://www.nevron.com/

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    16/62

    Superfluity

    Edward Tuftes The Visual Display of Quantitative Information

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    17/62

    Misleading graphs

    See: How to Lie With Statistics (Huff 1954)

    Breaking from convention can be(intentionally) misleading

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    18/62

    Poor scaling

    http://mediamatters.org/blog/201007010030

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    19/62

    Bad math

    http://eagereyes.org/blog/2009/bri ng-out-your-dreadful-charts

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    20/62

    Good color

    http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2009/

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    21/62

    Good graphs:Model reporting

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    22/62

    Good graphs:Model reporting

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    23/62

    Good graphs:Model reporting

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    24/62

    Good graphs:Model reporting

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    25/62

    Good graphs:Model reporting

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    26/62

    Visualization: Three arbitrary categories

    Infographics: Not what Im talking about Factoids

    Statistical Graphics: Make an argument Distilled representation of the results of analysis

    Information Visualization: Show the data Often high-dimensional, large-N

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    27/62

    Information Visualization

    Gelman: Creative, cutting-edge

    Visual puzzles

    Alternatives to photos and cartoons

    High density oftennecessary for multipledimensions

    Macro- and micro-level information

    Showing data, not presenting results

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    28/62

    Network ties

    Inherently multidimensional

    n n Matrix of 0/1 for tie/no tie betweeneach pair ofnodes

    Thus, data is n dimensional

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    29/62

    Making a point

    arbitrarian.wordpress.com

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    30/62

    Macro impressions

    miller-mccune.com

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    31/62

    Micro detail

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    32/62

    A story in multiple dimensions

    Challenge: To illustrate an institutional history

    through the movement of its agents

    Subject:P

    artisan

    ship, geography an

    d ideologyin the U.S. Senate

    Solution: Timeline depicting breadth and detail

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    33/62

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    34/62

    Closer view

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    35/62

    Specific detail

    url citation

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    36/62

    Same data, multiple representations

    url citation

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    37/62

    Movement over time

    url citation

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    38/62

    Different audience, different approach

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    39/62

    Different audience, different approach

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    40/62

    A history in multiple dimensions

    Challenge: To illustrate political history and

    dynamics through electoral results

    Subject:P

    artisan

    ship, geography an

    dtransformation inU.S. politics

    Solution: Maps with a third dimension encodedin color

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    41/62

    Throwing away data

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    42/62

    Continuous choropleth

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    43/62

    Distortion to incorporate weight

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    44/62

    Three parties

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    45/62

    Isarithmic approach

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    46/62

    Small multiple time series

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    47/62

    Interpolated isarithmic

    More fluid transitions http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4h62jRiUcc&fmt=22

    Some issues: Map projection

    Interpolation Color scheme

    Does convey a lot of information, and does

    appear to have made (some) people thin

    k.

    k d

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    48/62

    Making distinctions

    To recap:

    Statistical graphics Simple, familiar

    Show conclusions, make an argument

    Information visualization/Data display Deep, multi-level

    Show data, allow exploration

    What about high-dimensional statisticalgraphics?

    bi i l i l d

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    49/62

    Combining multiple needs

    132,480 simulations of Congressional voting

    Depicting the effect of parameters on

    estimates of ideological dimensionality

    Parameters of interest: True dimensionality

    Separation between party means

    Ideological versus distributive motivations

    Challenge: illustrate how a relationshipbetween two variables is influenced by other

    variables

    i 1

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    50/62

    Iteration 1

    I i 2

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    51/62

    Iteration 2

    I i 3

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    52/62

    Iteration 3

    It ti 4

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    53/62

    Iteration 4

    It ti 5

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    54/62

    Iteration 5

    It ti 6 (Fi l)

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    55/62

    Iteration 6 (Final)

    C l i

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    56/62

    Conclusions

    Let ends determine means

    Dont be misleading

    Think about conventions

    Make the viewers job easy

    C l i

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    57/62

    Conclusions

    Let ends determine means

    Dont be misleading

    Think about conventions

    Make the viewers job easy

    Concl sions

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    58/62

    Conclusions

    Let ends determine means

    Dont be misleading

    Think about conventions

    Make the viewers job easy

    Conclusions

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    59/62

    Conclusions

    Let ends determine means

    Dont be misleading

    Think about conventions

    Make the viewers job easy

    Conclusions

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    60/62

    Conclusions

    Let ends determine means

    Dont be misleading

    Think about conventions

    Make the viewers job easy

    Where to go from here?

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    61/62

    Where to go from here?

    Think about the rhetoric of graphics

    Google Edward Tufte, Hadley Wickham

    Visit www.duke.edu/~cdd11/tex.html

    Interested in tutorial session?

    Any questions?

  • 8/7/2019 Methods Talk, January 21, 2011

    62/62

    Any questions?

    Thanks

    [email protected]/site/dsparks