Upload
aspen
View
31
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Meteors from 209P/LINEAR. A Summary by Rob McNaught TA meeting 2014 May 10. 209P/LINEAR. 2004 Feb 03 - NEA 2004 CB discovered by LINEAR (MPEC 2004-C16) 2004 Mar 30 - Found to be a comet by Rob McNaught (IAUC 8314). North. q = 0.969 AU e = 0.672 i = 21.2 deg - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Meteors from 209P/LINEAR
A Summary by Rob McNaught
TA meeting 2014 May 10
209P/LINEAR
• 2004 Feb 03 - NEA 2004 CB discovered by LINEAR (MPEC 2004-C16)
• 2004 Mar 30 - Found to be a comet by Rob McNaught (IAUC 8314)
We
st
Animation of three 10sec expsTail 1 arcmin long2004 Mar 301.0-m reflectorSiding Spring ObservatoryR. H. McNaught
North
q = 0.969 AUe = 0.672i = 21.2 dega = 2.96 (P = 5.09 yrs)
Meteor Shower• Jenniskens (2006) 1st to note possibility• Lyytinen made dust trail calculations• Vaubaillon used supercomputer to calculate
millions of particle motions• Maslov made dust trail calculations• Ye and Wiegert (2013) modelled dust tail of
209P, used supercomputer for particles• Asher (2014) dust trail calculations• All indicate a shower over N America
Night tonautical twilight
Radiant 40o elevation
B. Berard, IMCCE
Max radiantElev = 58o
Radiant elevations corrected for zenithal attraction
Radianton horizon
For 07:00UTshift plot eastby 7.5 deg
209P meteor shower
Daylight tonautical twilight
Sh
ower
vis
ible
ind
arkn
ess
Fiji
New Caledonia
Hawaii
Samoa
Galapagos
True RADIANT
• RA 122 +/- 1d Dec +79 +/- 1d (Ye and Wiegert)
• 122.8 +79.1 19.6km/s (Maslov,Asher)
(Vaubaillon)
(J2000)Atmospheric velocity – very slow meteors
The observed (apparent) radiant will be higher in the sky due to the gravitational bending of the incoming meteors by the Earth (to a max. of 11 deg). This is called Zenithal Attraction.
Nearbydust trails
2014 EncounterVery consistent with the dust trails, but saturation of this plotallows no interpretation of the shower profile or peak time.
Vaubaillon
Asher’s dust trails
Note: profile through Ye’s plot has peak after the dust trails
20-rev21-rev
22-rev
23-rev
24-45-rev
46-rev
47-rev
48-52-rev
Asher’s dust trails
• Binning +/- 7 days will diffuse the reality of what is happening at the instant of the nodal encounter
• Dust trail calculations are much simpler to do and detail precisely where the centre of a dust trail is at the instant it crosses the node
• If the trail is wide enough, it will produce meteors at that instant
Asher’s dust trails
• Start with ejection at prior perihelion
• Alter orbital period to estimate particle arrival at node at same time as Earth in 2014
• Perturbations change this arrival time
• Iterate the starting period to produce arrival at node at exactly the instant the Earth is at that same solar longitude.
• Note the distance of the particle from the Earth (rE-rD)
Asher’s dust trails
Earth’s orbit
Particle orbit
Node
Initial P too short
Initial P too long
Initial P correct
To Sun
Simplified diagram
Earth at node, time = T
Assume initial orbital period(P) for particle and calculateits location in 2014 (time = T)
rE = distance of Earth from SunrD = distance of dust trail from Sun
rE-rD
Asher’s dust trails
• Dust trails <20-rev old have large rE-rD
i.e. too distant for meteors• The 22 and 47-rev trails have direct hits• Trails between 27 and 45-revs are almost
coincident, but rather offset from the Earth’s orbit
• Dust trails >52-rev old are still in the Earth’s vicinity, but strongly disrupted and not well suited for dust trail prediction
• The trails align across the Earth’s orbit almost perpendicularly, so peak at similar times (Leonid trails were more scattered).
• The first trails to be encountered are older, then younger and finally much older.
• Dust trail calculations are based on the centre of the Earth. A time adjustment is needed for when a specific location passes through the dust sheet.
Asher’s dust trails
Asher’s dust trailsYear Mo Da UT Revs a0 rE-rD fM
2014 5 24 07:58 20 0.002 0.00200 -0.2292014 5 24 07:22 21 0.001 0.00059 -0.1492014 5 24 07:06 22 0.001 0.00003 -0.1132014 5 24 06:59 23 0.001 -0.00027 -0.0952014 5 24 06:53 24 0.001 -0.00046 -0.0822014 5 24 06:50 25 0.000 -0.00059 -0.0742014 5 24 06:46 26 0.000 -0.00069 -0.0672014 5 24 06:43 27 0.000 -0.00081 -0.0502014 5 24 06:40 28 0.000 -0.00088 -0.0402014 5 24 06:37 29 0.000 -0.00092 -0.0332014 5 24 06:36 30 0.000 -0.00095 -0.0292014 5 24 06:35 31 0.000 -0.00097 -0.0262014 5 24 06:35 32 0.000 -0.00098 -0.0202014 5 24 06:33 33 0.000 -0.00099 -0.0212014 5 24 06:32 34 0.000 -0.00099 -0.0222014 5 24 06:32 35 0.000 -0.00101 -.---2014 5 24 06:32 36 0.000 -0.00102 -.---2014 5 24 06:32 37 0.000 -0.00103 -.---2014 5 24 06:32 38 0.000 -0.00104 -.---2014 5 24 06:32 39 0.000 -0.00104 -.---2014 5 24 06:32 40 0.000 -0.00103 -.---2014 5 24 06:32 41 0.000 -0.00103 -.---2014 5 24 06:36 42 0.000 -0.00101 -0.017
Revs – number of orbits of dust from ejection to 2014
a0 – difference betweensemi-major axis (a0) ofthe comet and the
particle at ejection. a0~0.0 => large particles
rE-rD – distance of the dust trail node from Earth’s orbit.(Earth radius=0.00004AU)
fM – estimate of dispersion of the trail since ejection(at ejection fM=1.000)
Asher’s dust trailsYear Mo Da UT Revs a0 rE-rD fM
2014 5 24 06:35 43 0.000 -0.00098 -0.0232014 5 24 06:37 44 0.000 -0.00093 -0.0312014 5 24 06:45 45 0.000 -0.00080 -0.0542014 5 24 07:12 46 0.001 -0.00045 -0.1162014 5 24 07:45 47 0.001 -0.00001 -0.0472014 5 24 08:00 48 0.001 0.00017 -.---2014 5 24 08:07 49 0.001 0.00028 -.---2014 5 24 08:12 50 0.001 0.00036 -.---2014 5 24 08:17 51 0.001 0.00044 -.---2014 5 24 08:20 52 0.001 0.00052 -.---
Revs – number of orbits of dust from ejection to 2014
a0 – difference betweensemi-major axis (a0) ofthe comet and the
particle at ejection. a0~0.0 => large particles
rE-rD – distance of the dust trail node from Earth’s orbit.(Earth radius=0.00004AU)
fM – estimate of dispersion of the trail since ejection(at ejection fM=1.000)
The 46-rev trail would combine with the main 22-rev peak.
The 47-rev trail will be a direct hit but this and older trails are encountered much later. This should give a second lower peak with a slow tail off.
Shower profile
Ye and Wiegert
(08:15UT)
(06:29UT)
For the reasonsgiven, I believethis is too broad &inconsistent withtheir other plot.
Asher’s dust trailsindicate a similarbut narrower spreadcomprising 2 peaks
Ap
pro
xim
ate
s to
ZH
R
What will happen?
• All studies suggest the encountered particles will be large – bright meteors
• Rates are very uncertain, as nothing is known of the comet’s historical activity. Rates will be ZHR=0 to storm! Estimated ZHR=200-400 from comet’s current activity
• Differences in peak (06:29-07:40UT) and duration (FWHM~0.4 day to rather less)
When is the peak?
• Ye and Wiegert - 06:29UT (modelling)
• Lyytinen - 07:00UT (dust trail)
• Asher (1st peak) - 07:06UT (dust trail)
• Maslov - 07:21UT (dust trail)
• Vaubaillon - 07:40UT (modelling)
• Asher (2nd peak) - 07:45UT (dust trail)
• Predictions are for the Earth’s centre. Peak will be 8 mins earlier from N America
Night tonautical twilight
B. Berard, IMCCE
Sh
ower
vis
ible
ind
arkn
ess
Correction to Peak times
Daylight tonautical twilight
Fiji
New Caledonia
Hawaii
Samoa
Galapagos +8 min
+4 min
+0 min
-4 min
-4 min
+4 min
+0 min
-8 min-8 min
-10 min
• Ye and Wiegert have probably too large a bin size which diffuses the reality
• I trust Asher’s dust trail calculations• Main peak centred around the 22-rev trail at
07:06UT (unadjusted), superimposed on a broader shower with slow rise and sharper fall off
• A lower peak from the 47-rev trail at 07:45UT (unadjusted) should have a sharp rise and slower decline
Conclusion
Finally• Staying in the UK? Don’t
let daylight ruin a good shower• Core of the 22-rev dust trail will intersect the
daylight side of the Earth, e.g. UK• Should fireballs occur, they will be visible if
the sky is clear• Peaks at 06:57UT & 07:36UT (adjusted) for
central UK, the apparent radiant will be at: Az=10 deg Alt=51 deg