Upload
dangque
View
217
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MetalsMetals
Class Objectives
• Recognize the different types of metals used in aircraft and where they are usedy
• Recognize that product form and heat treatment are directly related to material propertiesD l b i d di f h l i hi• Develop a basic understanding of the relationship between materials properties and design properties and values
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-2
Wrought Products
Rolled• Sheet and plateSheet and plate• Shapes (BAC 1490
and so forth)• Bar, rod, wire
Extruded• Shapes and bar
Cast billet
p
Drawn• Tubing and wire
Forged• Block
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-3
• Die forgings
Cast Products
Risers
Cope
SprueDrag
CoreFlask
Gate Part
Drag
• Sand
• Permanent mold• Permanent mold
• Investment
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-4
• Die castings
Sheet and Plate
ST
LT
L
LT
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-5
Sheet and Plate (continued)
ThermalCast ingot Thermalhomogenization RollScalp billetCast ingot
Inspect, pack, ship
Precipitation
Stretcher stressrelieve
Solutionheat treat
Precipitationstrengthening
(aging)
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-6
heat treat
Extrusions
ST
ST
LArea with ST
properties STL
LTproperties
LT
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-7
Extrusions (continued)
Extruded shape
Ram
Die
Billet
Die
Billet
Ram
Die
Extruded shape
Direct ExtrusionProcess
Indirect ExtrusionProcess
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-8
Process Process
Forgings
Grain flow lines
L
LT
Plane of parting line
ST
Die Forging Cross Section
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-9
Forgings (continued)
ExtrudedExtruded billet
P f
Forging steps
Preform
Blocker
Finisher
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-10
Castings
Trimmed Casting (Aluminum Alloy C355)
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-11
Castings and Forgings are ViableAlternatives to Hogouts
• Forging
Casting• Casting
• HogoutHogout
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-12
Forging
Advantages
M t i l t d t i
Disadvantages
Ch t fi ti• Material stronger due to grain flow (longitudinal properties around bends and fillets), higher allowables because of
• Changes to configuration can be costly
• Fay surfaces and bores, higher allowables because of reduced cross section of starting stock
y ,threads, and more may require subsequent machining
• Machining time reduced (or eliminated for many precision forgings)
• Unit price less than hogout in many cases
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-13
Casting
Advantages
C l fi ti
Disadvantages
C t t i l ll bl t• Complex configurations are created once in the pattern or mold, and come free in the final product by the simple act
• Cast material allowables not as high as wrought material
• Changes to configuration can final product by the simple act of pouring molten metal
• Hollow features or internal
g gbe costly
passageways possible
• Almost always the least expensive methodexpensive method
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-14
Hogout
Advantages
P i i t l il bl
Disadvantages
Hi h t i l t i th• Precision tolerances available
• Minor configuration changes do not affect tooling
• High material waste in the form of chips
• Complex configurations with g
• Short cycle times possible, high-speed machine centers
d i dl ti
p gmany setups very costly, no hollow features
reduce spindle time
• Least costly for small order base partsp
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-15
Forging Process
Billet Preform Finisher
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-16
Billet Preform Finisher
Reduced Cross Section of Starting Stock
Hand ForgingsForm blocks, disks, cylinders,and rings by flat die.
No Draft ForgingThinner web and rib, higher rib thanconventional-type forgings. Up to ribthickness/height ratio 1/23. Withoutdraft angle on rib wall.g y g
Precisionforging
Conventionalforging
Hand forging
P/L of conventional-P/L of conventionaland blocker-typeforging
Blocked forging
P/L of no draft forging
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-17
Blocker- and conventional-type ForgingsPermit some amount of excess thickness and 3° to 10° draft angle to final shape of parts
P/L of no draft forging
Break-Even Point Represents Return on Investment
10,0009 000
Precision forgingbreak-even point
H t
9,0008,0007,000t,
$
Hogout6,0005,0004,000al
cos
t/par
t
Precision
4,0003,0002,0001 000
Tota
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
1,0000
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-18
Production quantities
Very Large Parts Require Forgings
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-19
Benefits
Cost savings
Weightreduction
Reduced parts
More rigidgstructure
Fewer components
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-20
pand easier to
assemble
Aluminum Alloys
C it 11%
Miscellaneous1%
Titanium 7%
Composite 11%
Steel 11%AluminumAluminum
70%
777 Model
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-21
777 Model
777 Aluminum Alloy Applications
Lower skin 2324and stringers 2224Lower spar chords 2224 and stringers 2224Lower spar chords 2224
Unpressurized skin 7075Frames stringers
Pressurized skin 2524
Upper skinsand stringers 7055
Frames, stringers7075 and 7150
Upper spar chords 7150
Keel beam chords 7150
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-22
pp p
Material Designation for Wrought Aluminum Alloys
70757075Major alloy element Assigned when the
alloy is registered
Modification of the original alloy
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-23
Material Designation for Wrought Aluminum Alloys (continued)
Unalloyed aluminum1 X X X
Alloy Family Major Alloying Element
Unalloyed aluminumCopperManganese
1 X X X2 X X X3 X X X
SiliconMagnesiumMagnesium and silicon
4 X X X5 X X X6 X X X Magnesium and silicon
Zinc6 X X X7 X X X
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-24
Material Designation for Cast Products
A356 0A356.0Modification alloy
designator
Ingot identifier
Alloy group Alloy registration
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-25
Material Designation for Cast Products—Major Groups
• 1XX.X, aluminum (99.00% pure)• 2XX.X, copper• 3XX.X, silicon, with additions of copper, magnesium• 4XX.X, silicon4XX.X, silicon• 5XX.X, magnesium• 6XX.X, unused series of numbers
7XX X inc• 7XX.X, zinc• 8XX.X, tin
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-26
Aluminum Alloy Temper Designations
7075 T67075-T6Material
designationTemper
designation
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-27
Aluminum Alloy Temper Designations
D i ti C diti
— O Annealed
Designation Condition
— W
— F
Solution treated and quenched(unstable)As fabricatedF
— H X X— T X X X X X
As fabricatedStrain hardenedHeat treated
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-28
Common TXX Tempers
• T3 Solution treat, cold work, natural aged• T4 Solution treat, naturally aged• T6 Solution treat, artificially aged (peak aged)• T73 Solution treat, artificially over-aged for
corrosion resistance • T81 Artificially aged after T3• T81 Artificially aged after T3
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-29
Stress-Relieved Tempers Reduce Distortion in Wrought Products
• Accomplished by stretching (after solution heat treatment)– For plate and rolled bar: TX51– For extrusions: TX510 or TX511
• Accomplished by compressive deformation (after SHT)– For forgings (hand, die, block): TX52
-T6 511-T6 511Standard heat-treat designation.
Material has been stress relievedafter quench and before aging.
Indicates minor straightening after stretching to meet straightness and flatness tolerances. This digit is 0 ifno straightening is allowed after stretching.
Material was stretched to accomplishstress relief. This digit is 2 whencompressive methods are used.
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-30
Ferrous Alloys
C it 11%
Miscellaneous1%
Titanium 7%
Composite 11%
Steel 12% Aluminum70%
777 Model
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-31
777 Model
Typical Ferrous Alloy Application
Midspar fitting aftMidspar fitting, aft engine mount
Inboard flap linkages
Main landing gearSlat tracks
g g
Nose landing gear
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-32
Classification of Ferrous Alloys
• Carbon steels• Alloy steelsAlloy steels• Ultra-high-strength steels• Stainless steels
– Austenitic– Ferritic– Martensitic– Precipitation-hardened
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-33
Material Designation for Carbon andAlloy Steel
43404340Primary alloying
elements (Ni, Cr, Mo)
Percent carbon in tenths (0.40)
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-34
Material Designation for Austenitic, Martensitic, or Ferritic Stainless Steels
304304Type—austenitic Assigned when
alloy is registered
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-35
Material Designation for Newer, High-Tech Alloys
9Ni 4Co 0 3C9Ni-4Co-0.3CNickel-cobalt alloy with approximately9% Ni, 4% Co, and 0.3% C
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-36
Material Designation for Some Precipitation-Hardening Stainless Steels
15 5PH15-5PHCr content (15%)
Precipitation hardening
Ni content (5%)
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-37
Usable Strength Ranges
AlloyStrength range (ksi)
125-145 150-170 160-180 180-200 200-220 220-240 275-300
4130 X X --- X --- --- ---4130 X X --- X --- --- ---
4140 X X --- X --- --- ---
4340 X X X X --- --- ---
4330M --- X --- X X X ---4330M --- X --- X X X ---
9Ni-4Co-0.20C --- --- --- X --- --- ---
9Ni-4cO-0.30C --- --- --- --- --- X ---
300M --- --- --- --- --- --- X300M --- --- --- --- --- --- X
4340M --- --- --- --- --- --- X
AerMet 100 --- --- --- --- --- --- X
15-5PH X X X X15-5PH X X X X --- --- ---
17-4PH X X X X --- --- ---
17-7PH --- X --- X --- --- ---
PH15 7Mo X
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-38
PH15-7Mo --- --- --- X --- --- ---
PH13-8Mo --- --- --- X X --- ---
Titanium Alloys
C it 11%
Miscellaneous1%
Titanium 6%
Composite 11%
Steel 11%Aluminum
70%
777 Model
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-39
777 Model
Typical Titanium Alloy Application
• Core cowl and thrustreverser hinge fittings
• Precooler hinge fittings
Inboard flap supportlinks (2 places)
Precooler hinge fittings• Forward upper link fitting
(GE engine only) Elevator actuatorfittings (3 places)
Windowsill and posts
APU firewall
pOutboard flap support links(4 places)
Hydraulic tubing
Main landing gear-actuatorsupport fitting (2 places)
tubing
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-40
• Forward landing-geartrunnion bearing housing
• Springs
Alpha Titanium Alloys
• Commercially pure titanium– 25 to 70 ksi (annealed condition)( )– Pneumatic ducts, door thresholds
• Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo130 k i ( l d diti )– 130 ksi (annealed condition)
– Structure exposed to high temperature
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-41
Alpha-Beta Titanium Alloys
• Ti-3Al-2.5V
– 125 ksi (cold worked and stress relieved)
– Hydraulic tubing
• Ti-6Al-4V
– Structural fittings: 120 to 135 ksi (annealed condition)
– Fasteners: 160 ksi (solution-treated and aged-condition)
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-42
Beta Titanium Alloys
• Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al– 170 ksi (solution treated and aged condition)– Structural fittings up to 3 in thick
• Ti-15V-3Cr-3Al-3Sn– 150 ksi (solution-treated and - age condition)– Formed sheet, castings, pneumatic ducts
• Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr– More than 180 ksi (solution treated and - aged condition)( g )– Springs (tension and compression)
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-43
Critical Requirements forComponent Design
Wing
Lower Surface
• Skin (2xxx plate)• Stringer (2xxx extr)
• Damage tolerance, fatigue• Fatigue, damage tolerance, tension strength
U fUpper surface
• Skin (7xxx plate)• Stringer (7xxx extr)
• Compression strength, damage tolerance• Compression strength
Ribs
• Shear-tied (7xxx plate)• Intermediate (7xxx sheet)
• Shear strength• Stiffness shear strength• Intermediate (7xxx sheet) • Stiffness, shear, strength
Fuselage
Monocoque
• Skin (2xxx sheet)• Stringer (7xxx sheet)• Frames (7xxx sheet)
• Fatigue, damage tolerance, corrosion resistance• Fatigue, compression strength• Stiffness, fatigue, compression strength
• Floors
• Beams (extrusion, sheet)• Seat track
• Static strength, corrosion resistance• Static strength, corrosion resistance
Stabilizer
Lower Surface
• Skin (7xxx plate)• Stringer (2xxx extrusion)
• Static strength• Corrosion resistance, static strength
Upper Surface
• Skin (2xxx plate)• Stringer (2xxx extrusion)
• Tension strength, damage tolerance• Tension strength
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-44
Fin
• Skin (7xxx plate)• Stringer (7xxx extrusion
• Compression strength, damage tolerance• Compression strength
Critical Material Properties
Design Property Criteria Property Critical Material Property Property Evaluation
Static strength
Tension Fty, Ftu, FbruOHT, FHT, NT
Fty – small hole out OHT – open hole tensionFtu – large hole out FHT – filled hole tension
Structure must remain elastic to limit load and carry Ultimate Load. For composite materials, manufacturing flaws and Barely Visible Impact Damage (BVID) must be included
Fbru – Joint strength NT – notched tension
Compression Fcy, EcOHC, FHC, NC
Fcy – short columnsEc – long columnsOHC – open hole compressionFHC – filled hole compressionNC – notched compression
Shear Ftu Fty Fsu Ftu45 Fty45 thin webShear Ftu, Fty, FsuNC, NT
Ftu45, Fty45 – thin webFsu – thick webNT – notched tensionNC – notched compression
Durability
Fatigue Fatigue strength, open hole, notched specimen, low load &
Low load and high load transfer joint coupons data most reliable for material evaluation
Design service objective with high level of reliability
high load transfer joint coupons For composite, cycling to validate no growth.
Corrosion K1scc, SCC threshold and exfoliation rating
Heavy reliance on service experience
Damage Tolerance
Crack Growth Damage must be found before becoming critical. For composite
Fatigue crack growth characteristics
Inspection intervals & methodsg p
material, structure must demonstrate no detrimental growth with visible flaw.
CAI – compression after impact
Residual Strength Must carry limit load with large damage
Kapp, Fty, elongationH, - Composite fracture toughnessCAI
Kapp for low Toughness or wide panels, Fty for high toughness narrow partsHc for wide panels, CAI for local areas
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-45
Weight/Cost
Minimize within constraints Density, material costs Fabrication and maintenance costs must be accounted for
Weight Ratio for Structural Failure Modes
Failure ModeApproximate Weight Ratio
WoWc
Failure ModeApproximate Weight Ratio
WoWc
Tensile strength
Wc
PcPo
otyF
ctyF
E 50 F 50
Stiffness
Wc
PcPo
oE
cE
DFRCrippling strength
Buckling strength PcPo
oη
cη
PcPo
osE
csE.50 ocyF
ccyF.50
oE
cE
Fatigue performance
Crack growth PcPo
oM
cM
PcPo
DFRDFE
oc
Shear strength
Po cη
PcPo
ty 45° oF
ty 45° cF
cE
Residual strength
Po
PcPo
appK
appK
cM
PcPo
otyF
ctyF
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-46
Structural Material Usage on Commercial Aircraft (by weight)
100%17% 13% 12% 14%
11%70%80%90%
Miscellaneous
50%60%70% Miscellaneous
TitaniumComposites
82% 81% 78% 80%70%
20%30%40% Steel
Aluminum
0%10%20%
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-47
727 737 757 767 777
Selection of New Alloys on Airbus A380
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-48
Development of Material Uses in Airbusin Past 20 Years
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-49
New Al-alloys on A380 Wing
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-50
Notes
• Advanced metalic alloys were developed for B i 787Boeing 787
• GLARE, Aluminum Lithium , laser welded skin/stringer panels (6013), and FSW-Friction Stir s /st ge pa e s (60 3), a d S ct o StWeldeding are used on Airbus 380
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-51
Summary
• Develop or select the right alloy for the applicationS l t th i t d t f• Select the appropriate product form
• Select the proper temper or strength level• Consider materials properties and their relevance• Consider materials properties and their relevance
to performance criteria for a given application• Consider how the material and material properties
affect product performance and cost (recurring and non-recurring)
• New materials applications must be thoroughly• New materials applications must be thoroughly evaluated prior to design usage
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 11-52