2
Conrol bulk Control drilo Biochar bulk Biochar drilo MPN g -1 dw soil 1e+4 1e+5 1e+6 Control bulk Control drilo Biochar bulk Biochar drilo µg CO 2 g -1 dw soil 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 a b a b Metagenomics of bacteria, fungi and protists affected by biochar and earthworms in soil Anne Winding 1 , S.S. Santos 1 , P.D. Browne 1 , L.H. Hansen 1 , A. Johansen 1 , P.H. Krogh 2 1 Department of Environmental Science - Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark 2 Department of Bioscience - Aarhus University, Silkeborg, Denmark Acknowledgments: This project was funded by AU-Danish Center for Ecology and Environment through the projects Bioash and eDNA center. [email protected] Research Aims Background DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AARHUS UNIVERSITY Thermal gasification converts biomass into a combustible gas in an oxygen-poor environment, the bi- product being biochar which can be used as soil amendment to increase pH, sequester carbon and supply phosphate and potassium to crops. However, the biochar may also affect the soil organisms due to effects on e.g. soil structure, water infiltration, potential adsorption of nutrients and minerals. To risk assess the potential effects of biochar amendment to agricultural soils on soil ecosystem services especially biodiversity. Results Effect of biochar and earthworms on bacterial communities Results Earthworms Conclusions Environmental variables explained 95.2% of total variation 16S rDNA diversity by Illumina MiSeq. Bioash amendment separated bulk and drilosphere soil from unamended soils with pH and CFU oligo as driving factors. Differences between drilosphere and bulk soil was limited. NGS analysis af Illumina MiSeq sequencing was more sensitive compared to activity based assays. Biochar: Tendency of higher abundance of earthworms No significant effect of biochar on functional diversity, CFU, protists, however effects on bacterial genetic diversity Earthworms: Higher microbial activity in drilosphere, increase in oligotrophic CFU in control drilosphere Protists and fungi genetic diversity affected by earthworms Generally, the addition of biochar according to the plant P demand had limited effect on soil microorganisms and fauna in the tested agricultural soil. Effects of biochar and earthworms on protists and fungi Control Drilo Control Bulk Bioash Bulk Bioash Drilo RDA 1 (26.8%) RDA 2 (10%) -0.8 0.8 -0.6 1.0 pH Drymatter Respiration MPN protist CFU eutro CFU oligo sulfatase amylase cellulase xylolase glucosidase phosphatase glucosaminidase proteinase 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Only one earthworm species increased in abundance in the biochar amended soil. Earthworms had a priming effect on protist abundance and basal soil repiration. Culturable oligotrophic bacteria responded positively to earthworms while culturable eutrophic bacteria and extracellular enzymatic activities were not significantly affected. Basal respiration Control Biochar Abundance, Indv. m -2 A. tuberculata 48.4 a [29.167.6] 27 [2.951.1] A. chlorotica 90 [45.0135] 126 [76.3176] A. longa 9 [2.016.0] 10.1 [1.718.6] Lumbricus sp. 6.8 [-4.417.9] 3.4 [-2.29.0] A. rosea 5.6 [0.011.2] 7.9 [0.415.3] Total 161 [128194] 176 [109242] MPN of soil protists amylase phosphatase Control Drilo Control Bulk Bioash Bulk Bioash Drilo -1.0 1.0 -0.8 0.8 pH Dry matter Respiration MPN protist CFU eutro CFU oligo sulfatase cellulase xylolase glucosidase chitinase proteinase 4 4 1 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 RDA 1 (14.7%) RDA 2 (12.1%) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Alveolata Apicomplexa Centroheliozoa Cercozoa Chlorophyta Ciliophora Conosa Eukaryota Fungi Lobosa Ochrophyta Opisthokonta Stramenopiles Unassigned Others (< 1%) CB2 CD2 CD1 100 100 96 81 50 55 47 25 26 56 30 81 94 51 96 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 BD2 CD4 BB3 BD1 BB4 BD4 CB3 BB1 CB4 BB2 CB1 CD3 BD3 Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity Index Protists and fungi – Phyla level Methods The effects on soil microorganisms and fauna (protists and earthworms) in an agricultural clayey to sandy soil with SOM content of ca. 3% were assessed with activity based assays and NGS. Crops were alternating oil seed rape and winter wheat and biochar was added annually for 3 years. Earthworms, bulk soil and soil from drilosphere were sampled from field plots either left untreated, or amended with biochar. Earthworms were determined to species by morphology. Culturable eutrophic and oligotrophic bacteria were enumerated on TSA and water agar, respectively, while culturable protist were enumerated by MPN. Extracellular enzymatic activity was assayed using 7 different MUF-labelled substrates (Hendriksen et al. 2016). Respiration (CO2 accumulation) was measured by GC. Metagenomics of protists, fungi and bacteria were assayed by 18S rDNA and 16S rDNA sequencing by Illumina MiSeq. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% CB1 CB2 CB3 CB4 CD1 CD2 CD3 CD4 BD1 BD2 BD3 BD4 BB1 BB2 BB3 BB4 Relative Abundance Others (<1%) Verrucomicrobia TM7 Proteobacteria Firmicutes Cyanobacteria Crenarchaeota Chloroflexi Bacteroidetes Actinobacteria Acidobacteria Environmental variables explained 94.2% of total variation of18S rDNA diversity by Illumina MiSeq. Drilosphere soil was separated from bulk soil irrespectively of bioash amendment. This separation was driven by basal respiration and MPN of protists. Soil with signs of biochar and drilosphere entrance

Metagenomics of bacteria, fungi and protists affected by ... · Metagenomics of protists, fungi and bacteria were assayed by 18S rDNA and 16S rDNA sequencing by Illumina MiSeq. 0%

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Metagenomics of bacteria, fungi and protists affected by ... · Metagenomics of protists, fungi and bacteria were assayed by 18S rDNA and 16S rDNA sequencing by Illumina MiSeq. 0%

Protists

Conro

l bulk

Contr

ol drilo

Bio

char

bulk

Bio

char

drilo

MP

N g

-1 d

w s

oil

1e+4

1e+5

1e+6

Basal respiration

Contr

ol bulk

Contr

ol drilo

Bio

char

bulk

Bio

char

drilo

µg C

O2 g

-1 d

w s

oil

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

a

b

ab

Metagenomics of bacteria, fungi and protists

affected by biochar and earthworms in soil Anne Winding1, S.S. Santos1, P.D. Browne1, L.H. Hansen1, A. Johansen1, P.H. Krogh 2 1Department of Environmental Science - Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark

2Department of Bioscience - Aarhus University, Silkeborg, Denmark

Acknowledgments: This project was funded by AU-Danish Center for Ecology and Environment through the projects Bioash and eDNA center.

[email protected]

Research Aims

Background

DEPARTMENT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL

SCIENCE AARHUS UNIVERSITY

Thermal gasification converts

biomass into a combustible gas in an

oxygen-poor environment, the bi-

product being biochar which can be

used as soil amendment to increase

pH, sequester carbon and supply

phosphate and potassium to crops.

However, the biochar may also affect

the soil organisms due to effects on e.g.

soil structure, water infiltration, potential

adsorption of nutrients and minerals.

To risk assess the potential effects of biochar amendment to

agricultural soils on soil ecosystem services especially biodiversity.

Results

Effect of biochar and earthworms on bacterial communities

Results

Earthworms

Conclusions

• Environmental variables explained 95.2% of total variation

16S rDNA diversity by Illumina MiSeq.

• Bioash amendment separated bulk and drilosphere soil

from unamended soils with pH and CFUoligo as driving

factors.

• Differences between drilosphere and bulk soil was limited.

• NGS analysis af Illumina MiSeq sequencing was more sensitive

compared to activity based assays.

Biochar:

• Tendency of higher abundance of earthworms

• No significant effect of biochar on functional diversity, CFU,

protists, however effects on bacterial genetic diversity

Earthworms:

Higher microbial activity in drilosphere, increase in oligotrophic

CFU in control drilosphere

Protists and fungi genetic diversity affected by earthworms

Generally, the addition of biochar according to the plant P demand

had limited effect on soil microorganisms and fauna in the tested

agricultural soil.

Effects of biochar and earthworms on protists and fungi

Control Drilo Control Bulk Bioash Bulk

Bioash Drilo

RDA 1 (26.8%)

RD

A 2

(1

0%

)

-0.8 0.8

-0.6

1

.0

pH

Drymatter

Respiration

MPNprotist

CFUeutro

CFUoligo

sulfatase

amylase

cellulase

xylolase glucosidase

phosphatase

glucosaminidase

proteinase

1

2 3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3 4

1 2

3

4

• Only one earthworm species increased in abundance in the

biochar amended soil.

• Earthworms had a priming effect on protist abundance and

basal soil repiration.

• Culturable oligotrophic bacteria responded positively to

earthworms while culturable eutrophic bacteria and

extracellular enzymatic activities were not significantly affected.

Basal respiration

Control Biochar

Abundance, Indv. m-2

A.

tuberculata 48.4a [29.1–67.6] 27 [2.9–51.1]

A. chlorotica 90 [45.0–135] 126 [76.3–176]

A. longa 9 [2.0–16.0] 10.1 [1.7–18.6]

Lumbricus

sp. 6.8 [-4.4–17.9] 3.4 [-2.2–9.0]

A. rosea 5.6 [0.0–11.2] 7.9 [0.4–15.3]

Total 161 [128–194] 176 [109–242]

MPN of soil protists

amylase phosphatase

Control Drilo

Control Bulk

Bioash Bulk

Bioash Drilo

-1.0 1.0

-0.8

0

.8

pH

Dry matter Respiration

MPNprotist

CFUeutro

CFUoligo

sulfatase

cellulase

xylolase glucosidase

chitinase proteinase

4

4

1

4 1

1 1

2

2

2 2

3

3

3

3

4

RDA 1 (14.7%)

RD

A 2

(1

2.1

%)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Alveolata

Apicomplexa

Centroheliozoa

Cercozoa

Chlorophyta

Ciliophora

Conosa

Eukaryota

Fungi

Lobosa

Ochrophyta

Opisthokonta

Stramenopiles

Unassigned

Others (< 1%)

CB2

CD2

CD1

100

100

96

81

50

55

47

25

26

56

30

81

94

51

96

0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

BD2

CD4

BB3

BD1

BB4

BD4

CB3

BB1

CB4

BB2

CB1

CD3

BD3

Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity Index

Protists and fungi – Phyla level

Methods The effects on soil microorganisms and fauna (protists and earthworms) in

an agricultural clayey to sandy soil with SOM content of ca. 3% were

assessed with activity based assays and NGS. Crops were alternating oil

seed rape and winter wheat and biochar was added annually for 3 years.

Earthworms, bulk soil and soil from drilosphere were sampled from field

plots either left untreated, or amended with biochar.

Earthworms were determined to species by morphology. Culturable

eutrophic and oligotrophic bacteria were enumerated on TSA and water

agar, respectively, while culturable protist were enumerated by MPN.

Extracellular enzymatic activity was assayed using 7 different MUF-labelled

substrates (Hendriksen et al. 2016). Respiration (CO2 accumulation) was

measured by GC.

Metagenomics of protists, fungi and bacteria were assayed by 18S rDNA

and 16S rDNA sequencing by Illumina MiSeq.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CB

1

CB

2

CB

3

CB

4

CD

1

CD

2

CD

3

CD

4

BD

1

BD

2

BD

3

BD

4

BB

1

BB

2

BB

3

BB

4

Re

lati

ve

Ab

un

da

nc

e Others (<1%)

Verrucomicrobia

TM7

Proteobacteria

Firmicutes

Cyanobacteria

Crenarchaeota

Chloroflexi

Bacteroidetes

Actinobacteria

Acidobacteria

• Environmental variables explained 94.2% of total variation

of18S rDNA diversity by Illumina MiSeq.

• Drilosphere soil was separated from bulk soil irrespectively

of bioash amendment. This separation was driven by basal

respiration and MPN of protists.

Soil with signs of biochar and

drilosphere entrance

Page 2: Metagenomics of bacteria, fungi and protists affected by ... · Metagenomics of protists, fungi and bacteria were assayed by 18S rDNA and 16S rDNA sequencing by Illumina MiSeq. 0%