20
24/06/2009 1 Managing Metadata for Geographic Information Supervisor: Dr. S. Geertman Professor: Prof. Dr. Ir A. Bregt Paul Brous

Metadata Management In Organisations Final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 1

Managing Metadata for Geographic Information

Supervisor: Dr. S. GeertmanProfessor: Prof. Dr. Ir A. Bregt

Paul Brous

Page 2: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 2

1. Introduction

2. Methodology

3. Results & Discussion

4. Conclusions and recommendations

Contents

Page 3: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 3

Introduction

: “information describing spatial data sets and spatial data services and making it possible to discover, inventory and use them.”

Metadata is:

The European Commission (2007)

EN ISO 19115:2005, Geographic information - Metadata1

ISO/TS 19139:2007 defines Geographic MetaData XML (gmd) encoding, an XML Schema

Page 4: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 4

80% of the spatial datasets had no metadata,

18% of the spatial datasets had CEN metadata

2% of the spatial datasets had (some) CEN metadata

135 man years are required to produce metadata for the current spatial data sets (807.000 files x 0,25 uur/1500 uur.

Rijkswaterstaat South Holland

Van der Wal en Schram (2008)

Page 5: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 5

Introduction

Central Research Question:

What are the reasons why Dutch organisations fail to document their spatial data with appropriate metadata?

Page 6: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 6

Introduction

Humanware Dataware

Technoware Orgware

The four dimensions of a GIS (adapted from Traub, 1998)

Page 7: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 7

Introduction

Data quality

Adapted from Strong et al. (1997)

Page 8: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 8

Introduction

Page 9: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 9

Methodology

Methodology

Page 10: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 10

Methodology

Phase 1

Information analysis

Interviews

Main Topic

A select sample of Dutch GI organisations based on their use of geographic information

Phase 2

Online questionnaire

Page 11: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 11

Results

Results

Page 12: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 12

Results

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% R

esp

on

den

ts

Intrinsic DQ

Accessibility DQ

Contextual DQ

Representational DQ

Metadata qualities

Metadata production issues relating to Humanware

In agreement - Perspective

In agreement - Perception

In agreement - Attitude

In agreement - Competency

In agreement - Aw areness

Humanware

Sub-categories of issues relating to Humanware

Page 13: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 13

Results Dataware

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% R

esp

on

den

ts

Intrinsic DQ

Accessibility DQ

Contextual DQ

Representational DQ

Metadata qualities

Metadata production issues relating to Dataware

In agreement - Scope

In agreement - Emphasis

In agreement - Semantics

Sub-categories of metadata production issues relating to Dataware

Page 14: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 14

Results Technoware

Sub-categories of metadata production issues relating to Technoware

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% R

es

po

nd

en

ts

Metadata qualities

Metadata production issues relating to Technoware

In agreement - Accessibility

In agreement - Functionality

In agreement - Usability

Page 15: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 15

Results Orgware

Sub-categories of the metadata production issues relating to Orgware 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% R

es

po

nd

en

ts

Intrinsic DQ

Accessibility DQ

Contextual DQ

Representational DQ

Metadata qualities

Metadata production issues relating to Orgware

In agreement - Politics

In agreement - Policy

In agreement - Strategy

In agreement - Operations

Page 16: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 16

Results Metadata production issues in organisations

Relationship map to show the effects of each GIS dimension on the dimensions of metadata quality

Page 17: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 17

Conclusions and recommendations

Conclusions and Recommendations

Page 18: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 18

Conclusions and recommendations

A mindmap to demonstrate the relationships between the metadata production issues and the organisation

Page 19: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 19

Conclusions and Recommendations

What are the reasons why Dutch organisations fail to document their spatial data with appropriate metadata?

Conclusions

Recommendations

Issues relating to metadata production do occur in Dutch organisations.

Humanware Technoware

Dataware

The production of appropriate metadata for spatial data is a difficult, complicated process which requires a great deal of planning and expertise.

Organisations should be as clear as possible with regards to the choices made .

Orgware

Organisations should be aware of their production processes.

Organisations should be aware of the quality of their metadata.

Organisations should be aware of the needs of their personnel.

These issues impact the quality of the metadata being produced.

Page 20: Metadata Management In Organisations Final

24/06/2009 20

Thank you!